ONS TECH GLOBAL

7 Things You Should Know About GMOs

gmo food

You probably want to know what’s actually in what you’re eating, right? Of course you do. That’s probably why you read the ingredients label. But even if you’re making responsible choices, there still might be more to that meal than you realize. There’s a movement that’s trying to keep you in the dark about genetically-modified organisms (GMOs), not to mention a host of other nasties in your food. You’ll want to stick around while I tell you seven things that you should really know about GMOs.

1. Money is Being Spent to Ensure You Stay Uninformed

Giant corporations like Dupont and Monsanto spent millions of dollars recently in Colorado and Oregon to thwart labeling campaigns that would list genetically-modified ingredients. [1] In Colorado, for example, these two giants outspent supporters of GMO labeling by 22-1. These labeling movements are all part of the ‘Right to Know’ campaigns, but apparently manufacturers don’t feel Americans need to know what’s in their food.

2. GMO Labels Wouldn’t Cost Much

Those same labels these corporations are so afraid of would actually cost the taxpayer a tiny amount—about two dollars a year—but it’s not really about spreading the cost to the consumer. [2] Corporations want to turn a profit, and if the product you’ve been buying for years suddenly proclaims that is has GMOs, you’ll likely stop buying it. In an effort to stop the pro-GM labeling, TV ads even tried to tell voters that these labels would cost them between $400 and $800 dollars a year. An ECONorthwest report, however, proved that inflated figure wrong. [3]

3. Major Food Companies are Willfully Ignorant

General Mills was in the news recently when GMOs were taken out of Cheerios, so the next logical step should have been to take GMOs out of the entire cereal lineup. Well that didn’t happen for two main reasons: removing GMOs from Cheerios hasn’t translated to higher sales, and the company still doesn’t fully believe GMOs aren’t safe. As almost every company shareholder voted against removing GMOs, I think it boils down to what the company thinks will make the most money. This focus on profit is seen in the policies of many of the food giants. Companies aren’t going to ban GMOs when they’re making money.

4. Not All Requests for GMO-Free are Being Ignored

Lately, there’s been so many anti-GMO stances that some progressive and forward thinking companies are jumping on the non-GMO bandwagon. In the case of a vegetable that’s a cross between a Brussels sprout and kale, a non-GMO label is arguable. Hybrid plants are created when you crossbreed two compatible plants; no DNA is genetically modified or enhanced, but some people might still consider a hybrid a GMO. [4] The bottom line is most companies want to make money, and the anti-GMO movement is a big moneymaker.

5. GMO-Free Can Be a Good Business Model

For large and small companies, profits matter. Consider, though, the power of the organic food market right now. Everyone wants organic, and farmers and ranchers are taking note. Using organic practices can add as much as $100 to a head of cattle, so from a market standpoint, the organic movement makes sense. [5] While most farmers and ranchers are driven by profits, we, as the consumers, are presented with more organic and non-GMO options.

6. “Natural” Doesn’t Mean GMO-Free

Let’s talk again about those labels on your food. Have you ever bought something that claimed it was ‘natural’ without it mentioning anything about GMOs? [6] Buyer beware! A recent study found that a lot of those products actually do contain GMOs. Consumer Reports tested over 80 different processed foods with corn or soy and found most of them had GMO ingredients. [7] [8] If you want to make sure you aren’t getting genetically-modified corn or soy, look for non-GMO or organic labels.

7. GMOs Have Created a Crisis

Not only are GMOs bad for our health, genetically-modified crops are causing a big land crisis. Corn and soy are two crops that are genetically modified to tolerate multiple herbicides; however, what we’re left with is two-fold: crops dosed heavily with herbicides and superweeds! These superweeds are resistant to all the common herbicides and are quickly becoming an issue–especially for farmers in the southern US where most of these weeds grow. It’s estimated that almost 70 million acres of U.S farmlands are now infested with superweeds, and no one knows how to handle it. [9]

The Bottom Line: Avoid GMOs!

So yes, there are a lot of reasons to avoid GMOs, and many businesses are taking note of what consumers want and making adjustments. Progress is slow–and in some cases nonexistent–but eventually there will be change. After all, we have the right to know what’s in our food.

What about you? What do you think about GMOs? Leave a comment below and share your thoughts.

References:

  1. Goldenberg, S. Pro-GM labelling campaign hugely outspent in Colorado and Oregon ballot. The Guardian.
  2. Tims, D. Median GMO labeling would cost consumers $2.30 per year: New pro-Measure 92 study. The Oregonian.
  3. ECONorthwest. GE FOODS LABELING COST STUDY FINDINGS. Consumers Union.
  4. Sheets, C. Companies Pursuing Non-GMO Products For Competitive Edge, Experts Say. International Business Times.
  5. Ortiz, E. Market speaks louder than science: GMO-free animals a good business model. The Sacramento Bee.
  6. Gillam, C. U.S. foods labeled ‘natural’ often contain GMOs, group reports. Reuters.
  7. Consumer Reports. Food Safety and Sustainability Center Report on GMOs in Corn and Soy. Consumer Reports.
  8. Consumer Reports. Food Safety and Sustainability Center Test Results of GMOs in Corn and Soy. Consumer Reports.
  9. Keim, B. New Generation of GM Crops Puts Agriculture in a ‘Crisis Situation’. Wired.

Dr. Edward F. Group III, DC, NP, DACBN, DCBCN, DABFM has studied natural healing methods for over 20 years and now teaches individuals and practitioners all around the world. He no longer sees patients but solely concentrates on spreading the word of health and wellness to the global community. Under his leadership, Global Healing Center, Inc. has earned recognition as one of the largest alternative, natural and organic health resources on the Internet.

 

Print Friendly

About The Author

Dr. Edward F. Group III, DC, NP, DACBN, DCBCN, DABFM has studied natural healing methods for over 20 years and now teaches individuals and practitioners all around the world. He no longer sees patients but solely concentrates on spreading the word of health and wellness to the global community. Under his leadership, Global Healing Center, Inc. has earned recognition as one of the largest alternative, natural and organic health resources on the Internet.

Related posts

  • WhiteDragonKing

    Good article. It’s kind of a rule if they are lying about avoid it.

  • Donald E Lewis

    I started Organic on my Vermont Dairy Farm after using 24D a herbicide for weed control. The application I did not like. Started my journey in organic in 1950 and won many awards over the chemical users. I stopped using all chemicals in 1952. I found that herbicide is a hormone and should have been banned from use. it is now found up the food chain to Mother breast milk. I have read today the scientists are at a loss to the cause of AUTISM. We have natural hormones and babies are most at risk of mixing unnatural. There has been millions of gallons spread or sprayed all over the planet. This should have been band.
    Now GMO’S manipulating the genetics in the plants. It is at tremendous cost to plant the seed. It is causing a bigger problem than herbicide. The EPA, USDA and FDA was introduced for the people. It changed to favor the big chemical companies with the love of money. It is all against GODS LAW and logic. I hope it is not to late as our soil and food safety is close to the point of no return.
    Global warming is a big billion dollar waste of tax money. Not hardly any spent on the planets soil where all our food comes from. The over load of synthetic nitrogen is causing much of the global warming. It burns up the organic matter and releases it as CO2 the green house gas. It also leaches to the water ways cause pollution.
    The organic method traps the 78% in the atmosphere and furnishes enough nitrogen to the plants. It is closets to the earth and comes down with the rain as the plants only take ten percent of there growth from the soil. They average 90% water and if the roots are not restricted they will offset the produce. This is just an example what I have learned in over sixty years of Organic. The say if you keep doing what you do you get what you got.