Category Archives: Sleuth Journal

Ron Paul: Can There Be A “Right” To Gay Marriage? (VIDEO)

ron paul gay marriage

Last week the US Supreme Court ruled that all states must recognize same-sex marriage. How did they come to this decision and was it correct? Who decides?

Ron Paul: Hello everybody, and thank you for tuning in to The Liberty Report. Daniel McAdams is with me today, who is the executive director of the Institute for Peace and Prosperity. Daniel, welcome to the program.

Daniel McAdams: Thanks, Dr. Paul, it’s good to be with you.

Ron Paul: Well, what do you think is the big issue right now, did anything happen this past week, or were there several things that happened this past week?

Daniel McAdams: There was a lot that happened, we had the Obama Care decision, which you wrote about in your weekly column this week, which was big news. I think the bigger news that we were going to talk about today is the Supreme Court decision on same-sex marriage. It’s interesting because back when you were in office, we did a lot of Thursday Lunches with the separation of powers. We had Lewis Fisher, who is a great expert on this, and we talked about the different branches of government. I was really interested in the way this decision was presented in the media, that the Supreme Court legalized same-sex marriage.

Ron Paul: The one headline that I saw was, “Same Sex Marriage: Is it right?”, and for a long time I’ve been saying this, and I might have to change my speech, but I get a good response when I talk to a crowd of people who have some bit of an understanding about rights, saying that rights do not come from our government, rights come to us in a natural or God given way. And people say yes. But here, all of a sudden, same sex marriage is a right declared not by the Congress or the supreme court, but really by one individual in the Supreme Court in a 5 to 4 ruling, and all of a sudden, this is a new right. But when people hear us talking like that, they say, “Oh, they’re against the ruling and that means they’re bigots”, and all these things that people want to pin on us. But there’s a lot more to it than just that. for instance, I think it raises the issue of licensing, what they’re really talking about is license to get married. They’re changing how you get a license, the Federal Courts are over ruling what states have done and, in many ways, they’re changing the definition of marriage, which seems to be way beyond anything that governments are supposed to do. Matter Of fact, I’m convinced that much of this maybe could have been prevented by having a lot of less laws in the land.

Daniel McAdams: Seems like both sides have it wrong; the supporters of traditional families seem to have it wrong, and the pro same-sex marriage people seem to have it wrong.

Ron Paul: Yes, because I don’t think we should be involved in it. I see marriage as a sacrament, but not everybody wants to see it as a sacrament. But why is the government involved in a sacrament and say, “Okay, we’re going to have a license for you to participate in a sacrament”. Baptism, for many in this country, is still a sacrament, but we don’t go out and get a license. The question comes up, why have we succumbed to this to accept this idea that none of us can get married. I would assume you probably have a license, I certainly had a license, it was assumed, no questions asked. But that’s not the way it’s been for a long time. Looking into this, I found out that there are many that defend the position that this came about from the civil war, it came about because racism existed, and it came out because they wanted to prevent blacks marrying whites. That particular understanding was reversed in 1967 by the Supreme Court. It isn’t so much that the court is supposed to sort this thing out. If we lived in a libertarian and free society, that would be out of the way and you would be allowed to make up your own definition: do whatever you want as long as you didn’t exert aggression against somebody else. And those who believe in traditional marriage could have their traditional marriage and get married in the church, and those who want a secular marriage can do that too. But I don’t think we’re anywhere close to that today.

Daniel McAdams: The pro-traditional marriage people say that this will ruin marriage, this will undermine marriage. We were talking before the show and you mentioned a couple of interesting statistic about so called traditional marriage. You said 57% of millennials have their children out of wedlock, more than half of the pregnancies result in abortions, and we know that well more than half of marriages end in divorce. So it seems like traditional marriages are doing a pretty good job of destroying traditional marriage.

Ron Paul: I think this is an issue, matter of fact, I have even made the case that abortion is not legalistic in that you’re going to make a moral society. You can have laws regarding it because there’s a killing going on, but it doesn’t change anything. I think the courts are very, very political, people say, “They don’t have to be political because they have life time tenures”, but they are very political even during the abortion debates. Abortions were done wholesale in the 1960s, so the courts had to catch up, and in a way the courts are sort of catching up now with this. The whole point is that they can’t change anything, you can’t change a culture by legislation, so that’s why libertarians will make the point that if there’s no violence involved, don’t try to micro-manage this. So who’s right, who has the control of the definition. In a libertarian society, nobody does, but here, I think the people who believe in traditional marriage fall short in traditional marriages when they have a chance. But they shouldn’t go to the government and tell the government, “You are going to define it my way”, even though they might have a historical argument for that. At the same time, the secular people want to march in and say, “No, that’s exclusive”, I think so often we bring on so many problems and, to tell you the truth, I don’t think this is going to end. There have been people who suggest that this is just opening up the door for more and more problems, because there is an exclusion and it’s a religious exclusion. If it’s against your religious beliefs and they sort of did this with abortion, and I saw times when you as residents were forced to be involved, but eventually they said that if you had a personal objection to it then you didn’t have to participate, and that’s what they’re saying here. But I think you’re going to have lots of problems, possibly even in the military, who knows what might happen in the military.

Daniel McAdams: The Chaplains may be forced to do it against their will.

Ron Paul: Yes, and there could be problems in college campuses, we still have some religious colleges that will talk about mandatory dorm regulations. I think this ruling was a defeat for the constitution and a defeat for liberty, because both sides are rejecting the libertarian approach, they’re just arguing who gets to do this and that, and I think it’s a victory for big government. There was a time when I’ve tried to sort out judicial review, and we might do a program some day on this. Even Jefferson and Hamilton argued about how much review should be there, and even back then some argued that the courts should not even have the right to review congressional laws. But today it is epidemic. The Supreme Court believes they can rule on anything and everything, be it state rules, regulations, or politically correct ideas. And now they’re ruling and saying, “We are the arbitrator, we will say what marriage is”. You know they gave Kennedy some credit for saying some nice words about people who are in love have a right to come together and be a unit. But if love is the thing that brings us together, the argument can be made from maybe a legalistic viewpoint, that what if 3 or 4 people are in love. Are you going to be the arbitrator of who loves who? So, therefore, there’s going to be an expansion. I think it’s going to invite a lot more problems, and it’s not going to be solved just with this.

Daniel McAdams: As you say, popular perception is that the Supreme Court is the final verdict on these things, and the media presents it that way, I think people even think that way. We’ve had several guests in the old days on the luncheons who have said that that’s an absolutely crazy thought.

Ron Paul: In principle, I’ve challenged this whole idea of getting a license for a sacrament. But I challenge the principle of licensing everything, because a license is almost always used to exclude people. I’ve already mentioned it was used initially to exclude interracial marriages, so it was an exclusion. But if you have a license to be a plumbers, and say that plumbers have to have licenses, what are you doing? You’re excluding somebody else? Why doesn’t the customer decide whether he’s a plumber or not, or let his reputation or what his promises are decide whether he’s a plumber or not. But no, if you give them a license, then you have this cab drivers. Right now, there are some challenges to the licensing of cab drivers. But there is licensing of everything, and even if I argued the case that the states should not be involved in all this licensing, now it’s federal, which makes it more complicated. I want people to get back to the point of asking how is this compared to a libertarian society. This is more complex, because it’s always government: who’s going to get control of the government? Then you get intervention in economic policy: how are we going to take care of the poor? They say, “Well, we’ll take from this group and give it to this group and we’ll fix wages”, and all these things, rather than saying, “Maybe the poor could be taken care of better if we had a free society and sound money”. This is why I’m so strongly annoyed with all this, because it assume that this is a responsibility of government, and I do not believe that is the case. This is just mischief and there’s a lot of attention towards it, and I think it’s pretty amazing that there’s a lot to be said about the need for traditional marriage. But none of this stuff is going other help traditional marriage, matter of fact, it emphasis so much that the people who believe in traditional marriages are going the wrong way. We need to clean up our act and find out what traditional marriage is all about. In the same way, with the abortion issue, there are some people who are arguing that the abortion rate is somewhat down. But I was thinking, maybe that is good, maybe education is good, but who knows what is the real reason. Divorce rates may be down because people aren’t getting married. But these kind of things should be solved in a voluntary society, and of course, this society would be more peaceful, because if you want to be part of the freedom movement, you have one very, very strict rule. And that is the rejection of the use force, personal force, or legal force, by the government to do certain things. And, of course, it means you have to be tolerant of other people’s choices, you shouldn’t be too tolerant of government’s use of force, that is what we should be intolerant of.

Anyway, I’d like to thank everybody for tuning in today to The Liberty Report, and please come back soon.

This video was published by the Ron Paul Institute.

The Transnational Corporate “Niggerization” Of America (VIDEOS)

black scholar Cornel West

On June 22 notable black scholar Cornel West remarked that President Obama’s inability to label the Charleston shooting an act of “white supremacism” effectively “Niggerized” the Commander in Chief. “I would say the first black president has become the first ‘Niggerized’ black president” West told CNN.

Why? A Niggarized black person is a person who is afraid and scared and intimidated when it comes to putting a spotlight on white supremacy and fighting against white supremacy.

As West observes, the uncanny verb “Niggerize” suggests the psychic and cultural compulsion to assume the role of slave, with all of the connotations suggested for the subjugation of individual and collective history bound up in the complexity of African American identity and experience.

West’s allegiance to “democratic socialism” prevents him from critiquing the welfare state that has decimated black families and communities since the late 1960s. One must further question West’s assertion in light of Obama’s own privileged background at elite preparatory and Ivy League institutions. Indeed, much of Obama’s experience with US segregation and racism was learned through his intellectual-political mentors, including US Communist Frank Marshall Davis and leftist agitator-terrorist Bill Ayers.

As early as 2002 West used the inflammatory “Niggerize’ term in a similarly divisive context. In an address at Harvard Law School he drew on the “blowback thesis” prevalent in progressive-left circles to assert that the United States population was forced to take the position of victim through the events of September 11, 2001, intimating the attacks sprang from decades of violence meted out by the US military around the world. The “white supremacist” response, he suggests, was characterized by “revenge, retaliation, where the big folk on the block gonna hunt you down and crush you like a cockroach.”

Setting aside the craven logic of blowback committed to by the academic and pedestrian left alike, one might further question why West, whose father was a US Department of Defense contractor and who is presently a fellow at the historically Rockefeller-funded Union Theological Seminary (where he assumed his first academic post in the 1980s) would not take the opportunity to transcend the moment and point to the broader “Niggerization” of all American people by Obama and the US Congress via the fast-tracking and inevitable ratification of the Trans-Pacific Partnership and the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership crafted by the international corporate cartels. Indeed, it is no secret that “Obamacare” and such “free trade” deals are among the foremost goals of Obama before his departure from office.

Dr. West and President Obama Onstage

Dr. West and President Obama Onstage

The slavemaster corporate elite who control the global cartels–Soros, Gates, Buffett and their cohorts at Davos, Bilderberg and other fora–are Obama’s true overseers. So too are they the real “Niggerizers” of the world population, as evidenced in what is known thus far concerning such pending “trade agreements” and the feudalistic system their authors intend to implement.

Alongside Obamacare America’s first black president has placed every American citizen on the auction block, selling them at bargain-basement prices to the transnational corporate supremacists who will strip them of their last Constitutional protection of due process whereby they might meagerly contest the undermining of environmental and workplace rights at home and the misuse of their nation’s military abroad.

In the broader context of so-called “free markets” thoroughly ignored by West’s promotion of racial antagonism, Obama’s shameless advocacy of transnational corporate economic hegemony signals the twilight of humanity and its manifold experience of struggle for freedom and dignity.

Professor James F. Tracy is an Associate Professor of Media Studies at Florida Atlantic University. James Tracy’s work on media history, politics and culture has appeared in a wide variety of academic journals, edited volumes, and alternative news and opinion outlets. James is editor of Union for Democratic Communication’s Journal Democratic Communiqué and a contributor to Project Censored’s forthcoming publication Censored 2013: The Top Censored Stories and Media Analysis of 2011-2012. Additional writings and information are accessible at

Understanding Pope Francis’ Encyclical On ‘Climate Change’


(The Real Agenda) By denying poor countries access to fossil fuels, or a realistic replacement to promote their development, Pope Francis is indeed condemning them to perpetual poverty.

Neither Solar, nor wind energy sources are viable substitutes due to their poor output and their vast demand for land.

Let’s start by the conclusion, and along the way understand why Pope Francis’ latest effort to attract people to the Church of Climate Change is a failure:

Pope Francis has made an enormous mistake while attempting to weigh in on the global warming/climate change debate.

His perceptions on both global warming and climate change as well as other topics that he took a shot at, such as the use of fossil fuels and their role in the appearance of “catastrophic” atmospheric events related to the emission of carbon dioxide, which incidentally is a well-known and scientifically proven life-giving gas, are proof that he did not have any scientists by his side before or during the writing of the document.

The Pope started his peregrination towards the “scientific consensus” altar on the left foot. Along with his lack of scientific understanding, which has been demonstrated on the text of the encyclical, the Pope of the people also banned news coverage of his meeting with United Nations representatives and in doing so discriminated against journalists who wished to attend. The reason for the ban was the reporters’ public skepticism about the theory of anthropogenic global warming (AGW).

The 184-page long Holy Encyclical dedicated several of its paragraphs exclusively to address the environmental concerns contained in the Pope’s mind. These paragraphs are the ones that will have the attention of this article.

Let’s take a look at the first of the Pope’s statements directly addressing climate.

The climate is a common good, belonging to all and meant for all. At the global level, it is a complex system linked to many of the essential conditions for human life. A very solid scientific consensus indicates that we are presently witnessing a disturbing warming of the climatic system.In recent decades this warming has been accompanied by a constant rise in the sea level and, it would appear, by an increase of extreme weather events, even if a scientifically determinable cause cannot be assigned to each particular phenomenon.

Humanity is called to recognize the need for changes of lifestyle, production and consumption, to combat this warming or at least the human causes which produce or aggravate it.

It is true that there are other factors (such as volcanic activity, variations in the earth’s orbit and axis, the solar cycle), yet a number of scientific studies show that most global warming in recent decades is due to the great concentration of greenhouse gases (carbon dioxide, methane, nitrogen oxides and others) released mainly as a result of human activity.

Concentrated in the atmosphere, these gases do not allow the warmth of the sun’s rays reflected by the earth to be dispersed in space. The problem is aggravated by a model of development based on the intensive use of fossil fuels, which is at the heart of the worldwide energy system. Another determining factor has been an increase in changed uses of the soil, principally deforestation for agricultural purposes.

This paragraph is full of factual errors that can be easily pointed out and corrected with data from well-known international agencies whose observations and the evidence obtained during the process paint a different picture.

First, the planet is not getting warmer. According to data from the NOAA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the Earth stopped warming 18 years ago and the planet has seen a new global cooling trend for the past 10 years.

The next point where the Pope is incorrect is on the alleged rising sea levels. In this case, NOAA’s own data also refutes the Pope’s claim about significant increases in ocean levels and the supposed coming catastrophic rise due to global warming. In reality, oceans have risen na average of 8 inches per 100 years, since there is a registry.

Then, there is the Pope claim that man-made global warming causes events such as hurricanes, tornadoes, drought and heat waves to become more prevalent and intense. However, evidence and historical perspective say otherwise. As explained by James H. Rust, a retired professor of nuclear engineering, and fervent critic of the current ‘business as usual’ situation on energy policies, “suggesting carbon dioxide from burning fossil fuels is causing these changes is very tenuous when examining similar past events in times when carbon dioxide changes were not occurring.”

Last but not least, on the paragraph above, the Pope blames Carbon Dioxide for the current and impending heat and the general contamination of the environment. As explained by Rust, neither CO2 not any other greenhouse gas influences solar radiation because they are transparent in the wavelength spectrum. CO2 is not an environmental contaminant either as it is the main source of ‘food’ for plant life, which is what animals, plants and us humans eat. If there is one significant outcome that must be noted from the presence of large amounts of CO2 in the atmosphere is that CO2 abundance promotes better agricultural output. In sum, CO2 is a life-giving gas.

Without delay, let’s read and then analyze Pope Francis’ beliefs on what he calls a “vicious circle” regarding the carbon dioxide emissions into the atmosphere. In the paragraph below, he references statements that have also been disproven with Science, not doctrine.

Warming has effects on the carbon cycle. It creates a vicious circle which aggravates the situation even more, affecting the availability of essential resources like drinking water, energy and agricultural production in warmer regions, and leading to the extinction of part of the planet’s biodiversity.The melting in the polar ice caps and in high altitude plains can lead to the dangerous release of methane gas, while the decomposition of frozen organic material can further increase the emission of carbon dioxide. Things are made worse by the loss of tropical forests which would otherwise help to mitigate climate change. Carbon dioxide pollution increases the acidification of the oceans and compromises the marine food chain.

If present trends continue, this century may well witness extraordinary climate change and an unprecedented destruction of ecosystems, with serious consequences for all of us. A rise in the sea level, for example, can create extremely serious situations, if we consider that a quarter of the world’s population lives on the coast or nearby, and that the majority of our mega cities are situated in coastal areas.

Since most of the Pope’s assertions are linked to carbon emissions, let’s emphasize again that CO2 is not a pollutant, but a gas that serves a food source for plant life. CO2 abundance translates into more robust flora, both agricultural and wild rain forests, which he incidentally mentions as being threatened. As it has been pointed out by experts, CO2 can be considered a fertilizer which promotes more significant plant growth and with less need for water.

A direct effect of more CO2 as an available food source means having the potential for growing more food and for rain forests to grow larger. More about the positive social and economic impact of a carbon rich world can be read in a report titled “The Social Costs of Carbon? No the social benefits of Carbon, published by the American Coalition for Clean Coal electricity. The document also compares its findings to those of the report issued by the Federal Interagency Working Group.

In his struggle to attempt to produce a strong case, the Pope continues talking about climate change and what he calls its serious global implications for the poor, the group he likes to talk about a lot and who he feels an ally of in every single issue.

Climate change is a global problem with grave implications: environmental, social, economic, political and for the distribution of goods. It represents one of the principal challenges facing humanity in our day. Its worst impact will probably be felt by developing countries in coming decades.Many of the poor live in areas particularly affected by phenomena related to warming, and their means of subsistence are largely dependent on natural reserves and ecosystemic services such as agriculture, fishing and forestry. They have no other financial activities or resources which can enable them to adapt to climate change or to face natural disasters, and their access to social services and protection is very limited.

For example, changes in climate, to which animals and plants cannot adapt, lead them to migrate; this in turn affects the livelihood of the poor, who are then forced to leave their homes, with great uncertainty for their future and that of their children. There has been a tragic rise in the number of migrants seeking to flee from the growing poverty caused by environmental degradation. They are not recognized by international conventions as refugees; they bear the loss of the lives they have left behind, without enjoying any legal protection whatsoever.

Sadly, there is widespread indifference to such suffering, which is even now taking place throughout our world. Our lack of response to these tragedies involving our brothers and sisters points to the loss of that sense of responsibility for our fellow men and women upon which all civil society is founded.

The Pope wants people to believe that climate change represents a much more serious threat to the poor than war, which is the main reason people are constantly displaced in third world nations.

Migrants flee their land because they are being displaced by powerful military forces, as it happens with the Palestinians, with people in Iraq, Yemen, Syria and Ukraine. In this paragraph the Pope makes it clear that he does not think the poor nations should have the ability to develop as the rich countries did.

Pope Francis does not want the poor to enjoy the benefits that development provides, such as low-cost transportation, good communications, heating in cold places and cooling in warm place, which are the conditions observed in most fo the third world. As we mentioned at the beginning of this article, Pope Francis wants the poor to be poor in perpetuity.

On the issue of doing away with fossil fuels, the Pope says the following:

Many of those who possess more resources and economic or political power seem mostly to be concerned with masking the problems or concealing their symptoms, simply making efforts to reduce some of the negative impacts of climate change. However, many of these symptoms indicate that such effects will continue to worsen if we continue with current models of production and consumption.There is an urgent need to develop policies so that, in the next few years, the emission of carbon dioxide and other highly polluting gases can be drastically reduced, for example, substituting for fossil fuels and developing sources of renewable energy. Worldwide there is minimal access to clean and renewable energy.

There is still a need to develop adequate storage technologies. Some countries have made considerable progress, although it is far from constituting a significant proportion. Investments have also been made in means of production and transportation which consume less energy and require fewer raw materials, as well as in methods of construction and renovating buildings which improve their energy efficiency. But these good practices are still far from widespread.

The worst part of the Pope’s encyclical is that he does not provide viable solutions, limiting his opinions to unproven statements, flawed science and non-existent alternatives. He calls for dropping fossil fuels as the main source of energy and calls for the adoption of alternative energy sources without citing those alternatives.

If we assume that he refers to solar radiation, wind and biomass as those “alternative sources”, once again, the Pope shows complete ignorance on the inability of those sources to power development throughout the third world.

In addition to not providing clear solutions, the Pope conveniently left out what is perhaps the most serious threat to the planet and to humanity itself: Geoengineering. No public discussion about environmental threats can be taken seriously if it does not address geoengineering, the manipulation of te climate via aerosol spraying over the skies.

Humanity is being showered by aluminum, cadmium and barium among other heavy metals, which are directly responsible for the death of flora and fauna and for the appearance of previously unknown disease, yet the Pope omits geoengineering from his environmental driven encyclical?

According to neurologist Russell L. Blaylock, M.D.”nanoparticles of aluminum are infinitely more reactive and can easily penetrate the brain”

My major concern is that there is evidence that they are spraying tons of nanosized aluminum compounds. It has been demonstrated in the scientific and medical literature that nanosized particles are infinitely more reactive and induce intense inflammation in a number of tissues. Of special concern is the effect of these nano particles on the brain and spinal cord, as a growing list of neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer’s dementia, Parkinson’s disease, and Lou Gehrig’s disease (ALS) are strongly related to exposure to environmental aluminum.

The chemicals contained in aerosol sprays are responsible for increasing incidence in cancer, Parkinson’s disease, dementia, respiratory issues, asthma, and bronchitis, among others, but those who informed Pope Francis about the imminent dangers of environmental destruction did not warn him about the disaster being caused by the global program of geoengineering that has been active since at least 1960 and how this program threatens the planet and humanity?

I am no scientist, but I have devoted the last 18 years to studying topics such as environmental destruction and I can humbly say that Pope Francis has done no good to the environment by repeating the same propaganda that comes out of the mouths of political and corporate interests. Pope Francis has lost a great opportunity to call on his followers to wake up from the long trance where most of humanity has been due to the lack of courage from people in leadership positions.

Jorge Mario Bergoglio: You have failed your faith, your church, humanity and the environment by not recognizing publicly that the official environmental agenda is a ploy to keep people in the third world living in misery for the rest of their lives and in doing so furthering the secretive depopulation agenda that the leaders of the world have carried out for decades and that the Vatican and the Catholic Church have helped to keep secret. You have chosen sides and you have chosen to side with the power-hungry elite who wants to bring about a world government to fully dominate humanity. In fact, you have called for global governance yourself in the latest encyclical.

This encyclical should be understood as irrefutable proof that the Pope, the Vatican and the Catholic Church are working against and not along humanity.

Luis R. Miranda is an award-winning journalist and the founder and editor-in-chief at The Real Agenda. His career spans over 18 years and almost every form of news media. His articles include subjects such as environmentalism, Agenda 21, climate change, geopolitics, globalisation, health, vaccines, food safety, corporate control of governments, immigration and banking cartels, among others. Luis has worked as a news reporter, on-air personality for Live and Live-to-tape news programs. He has also worked as a script writer, producer and co-producer on broadcast news. Read more about Luis.

Paedophelia And The Brutal Cover Up – Psychopathy At Large


Hardly anything gets me more upset than the in-your-face paedophelia issue: the disgustingly obvious truth of it, the massive cover up and denial, and most of all the prosecution and abuse by authorities of the very victims of these crimes. In any other universe these people would be cared for, lovingly listened to, and protected.

Today? It’s the bizarro world of muzzle and kill the good people and let the devils run amok.

And this issue is not just paedophelia. This covers even more taboo subjects the cowardly public refuses to pursue. That’s the most outrageous and mind-bending aspect of this whole swept under the carpet issue. We’re also talking satanic ritual abuse, supposedly human creatures actually performing sexual and torturous blood sacrificial rituals on innocent children, as well as others.  Routine rape and other forms of physical abuse are merely lower level forms, yet just as horrific, of these same demonic abuses.

That this phenomenon that has gone on for centuries and continues full throttle into today’s world is something the world is apparently not prepared to accept – and therefore complicit in – is only sealing humanity’s own fate if it doesn’t wake up and decide to stand up against it.

The situation in the UK is ripe for further exposure. There are so many known creeps coming to the fore just ripe to be fully prosecuted. Valiant people have worked hard to expose this issue including David Icke and many others for years. The public is listening and it’s having a profound effect.

May many more arise to tear down the walls of cover up and deceit and lay into these bastards in the highest levels of power with everything in them!

If That’s Not Enough, Look at the Vatican

What more obvious and in your face example can you have than dirty, perverted old, and young, men disguised as “conduits to god” sexually abusing young people? It’s so common it’s become a joke.

Where’s the joke in that? Where the hell is common sense justice and stopping these perverse maniacs from preying on innocent children?

No – humanity is washed over with waves of pacifying propaganda minimizing the issue with just a dab of outrage to keep it believable. Damn. If you’re not outraged you’re not fucking paying attention!

Literally “cloaked” in garbs of deceit and presupposed authority these dirty minions from hell have been doing this for ages. And the outrage? Ask the billions of Catholics who maintain their dystopian loyalty to this cult of abuse. Where the hell are they? Transfixed in religious dogma and blind subservience.

But the Catholic Church is not only one vector of such ritual abuse. Research for yourself, the connections meet up with any and every organization or so-called religious or secret institution. Rampant abuse is at work as we speak.

It’s dark and very insane. And costing lives, often dying in abject agony. When will humanity wake the hell up?

The Ingrained Abuse System

Missing children and misplaced or supposedly dead babies and disappearing youngsters are rampant statistics yet no one questions why. Governments don’t care or it would be a center issue instead of marginalized on milk cartons, once upon a time,  and off beat news stories, if anything at all.

This is what we’re up against.

The cover up is as plain as day yet few seem to sit up and take serious notice. Hence the reference to our current dystopia, a place where up is down and right is wrong and nothing of moral value matters. We’re descending into just such a pit as we speak.

But It Doesn’t Need to be So

Real people care. They love, they have heartfelt concerns. The narrative humanity is being handed by these massive discrepancies not being addressed is simply a ploy, an old one in fact, of convincing the masses that what they think they are concerned about really isn’t a problem.

Controlling psychopaths having their way with a complicit humanity. Absolute self destructive insanity.

There’s not much more I can say on this, except the following video. If this doesn’t rip your guts open in outrage and disdain for our current fully corrupt system I don’t know what will.

Please, be a voice for truth and sanity. Make your conscious, loving and caring presence known for the sake of the suffering. Speak up and make a difference. Our future and that of our children and fellow humans is at stake.

Much love, Zen

By Zen Garder at

Deal Reached: Wireless Remote Drug-Releasing Microchip Implants On The Assembly Line

MIT-Langer-Cima-2 michrochip implants

By: Heather Callaghan | –

A pharma company with generic drugs meets michrochip and biotech in a marriage of implantable devices that are shockingly close to the finish line of commercialization.

Deals were made. Money exchanged. Development in process – this is actually going to happen.

Is this the next phase of The Singularity? The complete bypassing of pills, injections – things that one actively chooses and takes – to a passive acceptance of remote controlled wireless chips quietly and somehow pumping substance for up to 16 years? Or is it more public relations for the long-time push for the coming ”brain chip”?

But first to roll out will probably be the wirelessly controlled birth-control implanted device backed by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Rob Matheson of TechSwarm reports:

…Earlier this month, MIT spinout Microchips Biotech partnered with a pharmaceutical giant to commercialize its wirelessly controlled, implantable, microchip-based devices that store and release drugs inside the body over many years.

Invented by Microchips Biotech co-founders Michael Cima, the David H. Koch Professor of Engineering, and Robert Langer, the David H. Koch Institute Professor, the microchips consist of hundreds of pinhead-sized reservoirs, each capped with a metal membrane, that store tiny doses of therapeutics or chemicals. An electric current delivered by the device removes the membrane, releasing a single dose…


Now Microchips Biotech will begin co-developing microchips with Teva Pharmaceutical, the world’s largest producer of generic drugs, to treat specific diseases, with licensing potential for other products. Teva paid $35 million up front, with additional milestone payments as the device goes through clinical trials before it hits the shelves.

Langer was apparently inspired in the 1990s by microchip manufacturing to make a new drug delivery system. Cima, a chip-making expert had said, “…being out-of-this-world is not something that needs to stop anybody at MIT – In fact, that should be the criterion.” Cima recalls the early trial-and-error process saying, “We were trying to find the killer application. We thought, ‘I have a hammer, what’s the right nail to hit?’” Human trials for the wireless capabilities actually took place in 2011 – then Gates got involved.

The Techswarm report goes on:

Apart from providing convenience, Microchips Biotech says these microchips could also improve medication-prescription adherence — a surprisingly costly issue in the United States.

Do you hear that? Non-adherence won’t be tolerated because someone or something else will be calling the shots, so to speak… According to a supportive report by the Annals of Internal Medicine, the estimated unnecessary health costs of people who don’t stick to their meds is up to $100 billion to $289 billion annually.

Incidentally, that report goes on to say that a failure to follow prescriptions causes around 125,000 deaths annually and up to 10 percent of all hospitalizations. Is that on top of the 200,000 or so annual deaths caused by FDA-approved prescription drugs and more from the 200,000 – 400,000 annual deaths from medical mistakes at the hospital? (source)

Then we have the kicker – the first device likely to roll out:

While its first partnership is for treating chronic diseases, Microchips Biotech will continue work on its flagship product, a birth-control microchip, backed by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, that releases contraceptives and can be turned on and off wirelessly.

Cima, who now serves on the Microchips Biotech board of directors with Langer, sees this hormone-releasing microchip as one of the first implantable “artificial organs” — because it acts as a gland. “A lot of the therapies are trying to chemically trick the endocrine systems,” Cima says. “We are doing that with this artificial organ we created.”

Do I really need to point out that it might not be a good idea to allow an organization that strives for depopulation to remote control women’s decision whether or not they can conceive? Listen to the proud men who would be gods – it’s been a long time dream of upper-echelon scientists to replace and “improve” the glandular system. It began with attempts to sew animal parts into human glands in the early 20th century, funded by Big Oil. Isn’t it coincidental that one of the biggest health crises facing Americans is glandular dysfunction – including infertility?

Also, is this not an all too real metaphor for alchemy? Gold alloy for “this artificial organ we created”?

In December, I wrote about “Injectable 3D Vaccines With Programmable Particles Anticipated for Future Epidemics,” along the same lines. Previously, Brandon Turbeville reported on Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation work with developing “on demand” nano vaccines using genetically engineered proteins.

So there we have it, three or so avenues with which the “new medicine order” will be rolling out devices that mesh us with nanotech, biotech and wireless tech all in one. Who needs individuality and choice when one can let someone else take the medical wheel – from some remote location…

Heather Callaghan is a natural health blogger and food freedom activist. You can see her work at and Like at Facebook.

John F. Kennedy’s Speech Sounded Like Prophecy (VIDEOS)

jfk speech

(The Real Agenda) John F. Kennedy knew, as president, that he was in a position where he could fight the system whose birth was brewing.

JFK knew it because previous presidents had spoken about that system. They had been tempted and recruited to carry out what the shadow government wanted to be a coup d’Etat that would have ended the United States sooner rather than later.

On the day JFK gave his famous anti-establishment speech, he not only warned the American people about the secret group that he referred to as the enemy of freedom, liberty and accountability, but he also declared war on that system.

Kennedy’s words were prophetic in that he described the plan of the shadow government to very significant detail and every single of those details have come true.

The group that nowadays controls the planet via their puppet governments indeed uses secrecy and deceit to conceal their actions. That secrecy and deceit worked well for them for a long time, but now, for a variety of reasons people know things are not right.

Incrementalism has been another weapon of the shadow government. Their measures of control have been applied carefully and dutyfully to raise the least suspicion possible. As it is now apparent, the mainstream corporate media has been complicit in the plan and are a great reason for the success of the globalist establishment.

Even thouh we know that JFK was right and that the powerful interests that dominate the planet are well under way to reach the pinnacle of their agenda, it is not a bad idea to listen to the magnitude of such a plan.

Below is John F. Kennedy’s warning speech; the one that should have waken up all of America, but that for some reason that many still do not understand, failed to sound the alarm in the people.

And while we are at it, let’s also hear JFK’s predecessor; Marine Corps General Smedley Butler, who in 1934 revealed details about the conspiracy to replace FDR’s government via a coup d’etat. The powers behind such a plan were “moneyed interests” he said. This plan was part of a larger attempt to install a fascists dictatorship in the United States that ended up failing.


Luis R. Miranda is an award-winning journalist and the founder and editor-in-chief at The Real Agenda. His career spans over 18 years and almost every form of news media. His articles include subjects such as environmentalism, Agenda 21, climate change, geopolitics, globalisation, health, vaccines, food safety, corporate control of governments, immigration and banking cartels, among others. Luis has worked as a news reporter, on-air personality for Live and Live-to-tape news programs. He has also worked as a script writer, producer and co-producer on broadcast news. Read more about Luis.

The Sleuth Journal: New Target Of “Lenny Pozner” Copyright Infringement Claim

scj targeted

The Sleuth Journal is the new target (one of hundreds, if not thousands) of a desperate internet censorship campaign on behalf of “Lenny Pozner” and the “HONR Network”. As you all know, The Sleuth Journal has published a tremendous amount of research of the Sandy Hook false flag event and the truth is not being tolerated by those who are perpetrating the lies.

DMCA copyright infringement complaint regarding:

Below is the complaint we received:

Reporter’s Name: Lenny Pozner
Copyright Holder’s Name: Lenny Pozner
Reporter’s Email Address: [email protected] Reporter’s Telephone Number: 2034261121 Reporter’s Address: 261 south main street #332 Newtow, CT US Reported URLs:
Original Work: Pozner family birthday dinner
We have provided the nameof your hosting provider to the reporter. Additionally, we have forwarded this complaint to your hosting provider as well.

We will be removing said image, for now, until we research the issue further and explore our legal options. Our free speech and free press will not be hindered. Expect more dissections of Sandy Hook still to come in the future.

Related article:HONR Network, “Lenny Pozner” Fall Silent On Copyright Infringement Claim

Obamacare Travesty: The Supreme Court Continues To Make Stuff Up Out Of Thin Air


Thanks to the Supreme Court’s willingness to make stuff up, Obamacare has been saved once again.  In order to save Obamacare from utter disaster, Chief Justice Roberts essentially rewrote the law.  If you are thinking that the Supreme Court is not supposed to do that, you would be right.  But this is what our judicial system has devolved into.  When I was in law school, I was horrified to discover that most judges in our country just do whatever they feel like doing.  Instead of applying the law to the facts and coming to a fair and unbiased judgment, most judges in America just do whatever they want to do and then search for some law or case precedent that they can use to justify their decision.  If there is no law or case precedent, some federal judges even go outside of the country to find justification for their absolutely ridiculous rulings.  There have been instances where international law or international standards of morality have been cited as authority for a decision in a federal case.  We have become a lawless land where the letter of the law no longer holds any real meaning, and where tyrannical judges just make stuff up out of thin air in order to advance their own personal political agendas.

This decision on Obamacare should have been quite straightforward for the court.  The following is how Business Insider described the key issue in this case…

The case revolved around the interpretation of a phrase that stated that healthcare exchanges must be “established by the State” in order to receive tax credits. Scalia said that he was baffled that the majority of the justices could interpret this to mean that the federal government could give tax credits in states where exchanges weren’t established by the state.

“Words no longer have meaning if an Exchange that is not established by a State is ‘established by the State.’ It is hard to come up with a clearer way to limit tax credits to state Exchanges than to use the words ‘established by the State,’” Scalia said.

That sounds pretty basic, right?

“Established by the state” should mean “established by the state”?

In his dissent, Justice Antonin Scalia scolded the court for discarding all usual rules of interpretation in order to preserve Obamacare…

“Under all the usual rules of interpretation, in short, the government should lose this case. But normal rules of interpretation seem always to yield to the overriding principle of the present court: The Affordable Care Act must be saved.”

To say that Scalia was upset by this decision would be a massive understatement.  He says that this ridiculous decision will be “remembered through the years” and that it sends a message that “the Supreme Court of the United States favors some laws over others, and is prepared to do whatever it takes to uphold and assist its favorites”…

“But this Court’s two decisions on the Act will surely be remembered through the years. The somersaults of statutory interpretation they have performed (‘penalty’ means tax, ‘further [Medicaid] payments to the State’ means only incremental Medicaid payments to the State, ‘established by the State’ means not established by the State) will be cited by litigants endlessly, to the confusion of honest jurisprudence. And the cases will publish forever the discouraging truth that the Supreme Court of the United States favors some laws over others, and is prepared to do whatever it takes to uphold and assist its favorites.”

Near the end of his dissent, he chided his fellow justices for rewriting Obamacare in order to save it, and he suggested that this law should now be referred to as “SCOTUScare”…

“This Court revised major components of the statute in order to save them from unconstitutionality.… We should start calling this law SCOTUScare.”

Normally, at the end of a dissenting opinion it is traditional for a Supreme Court justice to state “I respectfully dissent”.

But this time, Scalia simply ended with “I dissent”.

That may not seem like much to you, but in the legal world that is extremely significant.

Of course Obama was absolutely thrilled by this Obamacare decision.  The following comes from CBS News

President Obama commended a Supreme Court ruling that upheld a major portion of the Affordable Care Act on Thursday, hailing the decision as a vindication of his push for health care reform – and a clear signal to the law’s opponents that it’s time to give up the ghost.

“As the dust has settled, there can be no doubt this law is working,” the president said in a brief speech from the White House Rose Garden. “After multiple challenges to this law before the Supreme Court, the Affordable Care Act is here to stay. This morning, the court upheld a critical part of this law – the part that’s made it easier for Americans to afford health insurance no matter where you live.”

This all makes me very sad.  Our law schools have become indoctrination centers for progressivism.  Our law students are being taught that the U.S. Constitution is a “living, breathing document” and that courts should determine what the best end result of a case should be and then figure out the best way to justify that decision.

Our law schools are some of the most liberal institutions in the entire country.  This is true even in the most “conservative” states.  Over the past several decades, graduates of these law schools have flooded the legal system and now dominate the judiciary on every level.

Yes, we can elect a new president and many new members of Congress in 2016, but changing the judiciary would literally take generations to accomplish.  That is why so many prominent voices are increasingly speaking out about “the tyranny of the judiciary”.  We have hordes of activist judges running around doing pretty much anything that they feel like doing.  It truly is a national crisis.

On a day to day basis, Barack Obama and Congress get a tremendous amount of criticism (and rightly so), but our judicial branch is also deeply, deeply corrupt and it would be much, much harder to fix.

Over the next few days, several more very important Supreme Court decisions will be announced.  And without a doubt, we should expect to see the “justices” continue to make stuff up out of thin air.

If our founding fathers could see what was happened to the Supreme Court that they created, they would be rolling over in their graves.

Michael T. Snyder is a graduate of the McIntire School of Commerce at the University of Virginia and has a law degree and an LLM from the University of Florida Law School. He is an attorney that has worked for some of the largest and most prominent law firms in Washington D.C. and who now spends his time researching and writing and trying to wake the American people up. You can follow his work on The Economic Collapse blog, End of the American Dream and The Truth Wins. His new novel entitled “The Beginning Of The End” is now available on

My Flag And Beliefs Held Hostage

us flag 4th of july 

In 1935 author Sinclair Lewis wrote ” When fascism comes to America it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying the cross.” Amazing how he could see ahead 80 years! With another July 4th around the corner, replete with the usual fireworks, barbeques and beer, perhaps it is time for us to ponder the direction our Amerikan Empire has taken. Let’s just focus on the 15 years of this the 21st century, ok?  The presidential election of 2000 revealed (blatantly to the world outside of our borders) just how devious this Military Industrial Empire can be. The movers and shakers of our Two Party ‘One Party’ syndicate (and that is what they are) decided that it would be much better for their greedy and exploitive interests to have Junior Bush and his puppeteer, Darth Cheney, in office. Al Gore would have been ok to them, having done his apprenticeship under their stooge ‘Smirking Bill’, but maybe the Bush/Cheney gang could get more done and quicker. So, they fixed the election and got that gang the power they needed to do the ‘ dirty deeds ‘. And boy, they sure did!

The folks in the 9/11 Truth movement love the flag and are as patriotic, more so in fact, than those who follow the empire’s ‘company line’. One fine attribute of that group is that it is made up of conservatives, ultra conservative libertarians, progressives, socialists etc. All they focus on is what really happened on 9/11 and of course afterwards… when the police/surveillance state went wild. To love one’s country and its flag is NOT exclusive to the right wing or neo liberal crew. It is NOT exclusive to the phony hypocrites within the Republican and Democratic parties… they who serve the empire so well. We who care about this great nation follow the words of Ben Franklin to a tee: “Dissent is the lifeblood of democracy.” Thus, we stood (and many still stand) out in public against the warmongers within this empire who destroyed Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya, and now wish to do the same with Syria and maybe Russia.

Ah, now we come to that great standard bearer Ole Time Religion. Before I go into discourse on the religion of my roots, let’s look at a few others. You cannot believe how many Muslims I have spoken to who think that the zealots and fanatical Islamists do not have a clue  as to what the Koran teaches. They  have nothing in common with people who preach killing infidels and establishing Islamic states etc. Jewish folks I speak to feel the same way about the arrogant fanatical orthodox Jewish groups… people who really think that non Jews are 2nd class and  not worthy of the same rights that Jews enjoy in Israel… especially Arabs. Sadly, they look upon the Palestinians as the Nazis did to their ancestors: subhuman bottom feeders! Of course, the ‘crème de la crème’ of fanatical religious thinking has to be reserved for my good old Christian warriors who see the planet as a battleground for their ‘good’ vs. everyone else’s ‘evil’. They forget that the man I personally admire, he who carried the Christ Spirit for all to share, was referred to as The Prince of Peace. How many moments in actual New Testament scripture does one need to read about what Jesus of Nazareth preached: ‘Easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than a rich man to enter the kingdom of God.’  When a wealthy young man asked to follow him, Jesus said ‘If you want to be perfect, go sell what you have and give to the poor and you will have treasure in heaven, and come follow me.’ As far as pre-emptive wars and drone missile attacks, whereupon ‘collateral damage’ become a way of life, Jesus said ‘In as much as ye have done it unto one of the least of these, my brothers, ye have done it unto me.’

This writer realizes it is not cogent in the realm of political discourse and dissent to share one’s belief in the almighty, or in the faith of a universe outside of this crap we call reality. A very wise man once told me when I asked him ” Is there a God?” that the universe or God is simply Love. Thus, logic would dictate that if one believes that, then what follows is ‘Anything not of love cannot be of God.’  Jackie DeShannon put it best in the Bacharach & David 60s song: “What the world needs now is love, sweet love, it’s the only thing there is much too little of… What the world needs now is love sweet love, no, not just for some but for everyone.” Waving flags and wearing religious icons while saluting war and empire is not gonna do it folks.

Philip A Farruggio is son and grandson of Brooklyn, NYC longshoremen. He is a free lance columnist (found on World News Trust, Nation of Change Blog,,, The Intrepid Report , The Peoples Voice, Information Clearing house, Dandelion Salad, Activist Post, Dissident Voice and many other sites worldwide). Philip works as an environmental products sales rep and has been an activist leader since 2000. In 2010 he became a local spokesperson for the 25% Solution Movement to Save Our Cities by cutting military spending 25%. Philip can be reached at [email protected]

Fifteen Questions That Are Being Asked About The Charleston Shooting (VIDEOS)

By: James Perloff |

DISCLAIMER: I was not in Charleston and did not witness the event. I am not asserting that Dylann Roof did not commit the crime attributed to him. If the tragedy occurred just as the media has said, my heart goes out to the victims’ families, and nothing here is intended to disparage the memory of the dead.

However, those who realize America has long been run by a shadow oligarchy know our country has experienced many false flags. Some have been used to attempt to bring us into wars, such as the sinking of the Maine, the sinking of the Lusitania, the foreknown attack on Pearl Harbor, the artificially contrived Korean War, the Tonkin Gulf-induced Vietnam War, the attack on the USS Liberty, 9/11, and the various pretexts used for multiple Middle Eastern wars that General Wesley Clark says were foretold to him at the Pentagon in 2001. We have also seen false flags used to advance gun control and a domestic police state, as in Oklahoma City, Sandy Hook, and France’s Charlie Hebdo. So we would not be injudicious to examine the Charleston incident closely, and we do find that reasonable questions are being raised. I am especially indebted to Redsilverj, one of YouTube’s top alternative media analysts, for so many insights, several of which I have embedded here. Hats off to you, Redsilverj.

(1) Why do the family members interviewed here show little sorrow and emotion just one day after the incident? I am a Christian, and I understand that forgiveness is inherent to Christ’s teachings. Nevertheless, it is usual even for Christians to go through the normal grieving process. Calmness might occur after the death of a terminally ill loved one, where death had been long anticipated, but not typically in the case of sudden death, especially where one has seen the shock of a parent’s bloodied corpse:

(2) Redsilverj asks: why is this family member repeating the same lines in two different media interviews, as if scripted?

(3) Why is the U.S. government giving $29 million to the families? People die in shootings every day, and the government doesn’t give them a nickel. Some are asking if this could be actor reimbursement:

(4) Why was the church already re-opened for services on Sunday? Isn’t cleanup from a bloody massacre a time-consuming process? And isn’t this a crime scene?

(5) Why was only one person reported wounded? How was Dylann Roof able to get nearly a 100 percent kill ratio (similar to Adam Lanza at Sandy Hook). Roof allegedly did this using a single handgun. One must be a good shot to fire lethal shots with a handgun. According to news reports, Roof reloaded five times. One would think some people should have had time to flee.

(6) As with Charlie Hebdo, there are no pictures whatsoever of bodies or carnage. Is this from good taste and respect for the victims, or possibly because the incident differs from what we were told?

(7) Why did the media already have such a detailed profile of Dylann Roof, including sound bites from a relative, just hours after his arrest?

(8) Is it only a coincidence that the Department of Homeland Security had an “Active Shooter Threat Training Program” scheduled for Charleston at the very time of the shooting?

Time and time again we have seen drills and military exercises coinciding with false flag events, including 9/11 and the Boston Marathon Bombing.

(9) Although Roof’s Facebook page has been removed from the Web, why does the Wayback Machine show it was created only days before the shooting? (View from about 1:00 to 2:30 of the video):

(10) Is it possible that Roof, as some believe, is actually John Christian Graas, who was a child actor in the 1990s (Kindergarten Cop; Dr. Quinn, Medicine Woman) and who was in the United States Marine Corps in 2010 according to his IMDB biography?




(11) Is it a coincidence that the incident occurred as Jade Helm is getting under way, an event that many believe is intended to transition America into martial law, and which mandates that Special Ops forces infiltrate local communities disguised as civilians? As the May 21 Houston Chronicle reported of Jade Helm: “Among the planned exercises, soldiers will try to operate undetected amongst civilian populations.” Could this possibly be a clue to Dylann Roof’s excellent marksmanship?

(12) Is it only coincidence that “Mother” Emanuel A.M.E. Church has long ties to Freemasonry and that Charleston is an historic center of Freemasonry?

(13) Is it only coincidence that Charleston was the first state to secede from the Union before the Civil War, and thus symbolizes the Confederate flag now being targeted for banning?

(14) Is it only coincidence that this event distracted public attention from the critical TPP Fast-Track vote occurring in Congress on the same day?

(15) Is the incident actually a psy-op intended to conveniently push several agendas:

  • Advance gun control and ultimately repeal of the Second Amendment?
  • Generate the racial tensions already fanned by the media-hyped Zimmerman case and the George Soros-funded rioting in Ferguson and Baltimore which followed police shootings of Afro-Americans?

Shut down Internet sites and freedom of speech, which is being touted as responsible for actions such as Roof’s?

Start reclassifying American citizens as “terrorists” to pave the way for detaining them without trial?


June 26. I believe I should keep this post updated. As would be expected, more observations are coming in from alternative media:

–This video points out that Dylann Roof was wearing a bullet-proof vest in the photo of him entering the church. Since such vests are expensive, how did this unemployed kid afford it? Is this another detail suggesting that Roof might be a covert military asset like Timothy McVeigh?

–This blog post reports that Dylann Roof was a gentle Christian and asks if the arrested perp might be a different person:

dylann-roof1Dylann Roof South Carolina Church Massacre Gunman Conspiracy

–A post at Global Research notes that forensic analysis indicates the Apartheid-era patches seen on Roof’s jacket may have been digitally added to the photograph.


June 29.
–If the widespread attack on the Confederate flag is a “spontaneous” response to the Charleston incident, this YouTuber wants to know why “Dukes of Hazzard” toy cars…

are already missing the confederate flag:

–Aaron and Melissa Dykes (Truthsteam Media) think the gentle, guns-holstered arrest of Dylann Roof was for the same purpose that Redsilverj believes the cops took Roof to Burger King for lunch: enflame racial tensions with an in-your-face double standard: Afro-American criminals we shoot in the back, but white criminals we take to lunch. This seems like more of the same emotion button-pushing seen in Ferguson and Baltimore, intended to provoke civil disorder and lead ultimately to martial law.

Original article:

The Pope’s Top Climate Change Advisor Does Not Believe In God – But He Does Appear To Believe In ‘Gaia’

German professor John Schellnhuber and pope

What kind of people is Pope Francis surrounding himself with?  The fact that this Pope decided to choose German professor John Schellnhuber as his chief climate change advisor is raising a lot of eyebrows.  Schellnhuber doesn’t believe in God, but as you will see below, he does appear to believe in ‘Gaia’.  Schellnhuber has also advocated for the establishment of an “Earth Constitution”, a “Global Council” directly elected by the citizens of the world, and a “Planetary Court” that would serve as the pinnacle of a planetary legal system.  In addition, he believes that the “carrying capacity” of our planet is less than one billion people.  This is the man that the Pope has chosen to advise him on the issue that Pope Francis has made the centerpiece of his papacy.

The concept of ‘Gaia’ has deep roots in ancient paganism.  Many of the advocates of the ‘Gaia hypothesis‘ do not consider themselves to be religious, but in reality it is a kind of “scientific pantheism”.  This quasi-scientific theory was popularized by James Lovelock in his book entitled “Gaia: A New Look At Life On Earth“, and apparently this is a theory that Schellnhuber endorses.  The following is an extended excerpt from a recent article by William M. Briggs

In the Gaia Principle, Mother Earth is alive, and even, some think, aware in some ill-defined, mystical way. The Earth knows man and his activities and, frankly, isn’t too happy with him.

This is what we might call “scientific pantheism,” a kind that appeals to atheistic scientists. It is an updated version of the pagan belief that the universe itself is God, that the Earth is at least semi-divine — a real Brother Sun and Sister Water! Mother Earth is immanent in creation and not transcendent, like the Christian God.

What’s this have to do with Schellnhuber? In the 1999 Nature paper “‘Earth system’ analysis and the second Copernican revolution,” he said:

Ecosphere science is therefore coming of age, lending respectability to its romantic companion, Gaia theory, as pioneered by Lovelock and Margulis. This hotly debated ‘geophysiological’ approach to Earth-system analysis argues that the biosphere contributes in an almost cognizant way to self-regulating feedback mechanisms that have kept the Earth’s surface environment stable and habitable for life.

Geo-physiological, in case you missed it. Cognizant, in black and white. So dedicated is Schellnhuber to this belief that he says “the Gaia approach may even include the influence of biospheric activities on the Earth’s plate-tectonic processes.”  Not the other way around, mind you, where continental drift and earthquakes effects life, but where life effects earthquakes.

He elaborates:

Although effects such as the glaciations may still be interpreted as over-reactions to small disturbances — a kind of cathartic geophysiological fever — the main events, resulting in accelerated maturation by shock treatment, indicate that Gaia faces a powerful antagonist. Rampino has proposed personifying this opposition as Shiva, the Hindu god of destruction.

So why would the Pope rely on the “expertise” of someone that does not believe in God, but that argues that “Gaia faces a powerful antagonist”?

Perhaps someone should ask him.

And someone should also ask the Pope why he is hanging around with someone that believes that our planet is overpopulated by six billion people

Schellnhuber is most famous for predicting that the “carrying capacity” of the earth is “below” 1 billion people. When confronted with this, he called those who quoted him “liars.” But he then repeated the same claim, saying, “All I said was that if we had unlimited global warming of eight degrees warming, maybe the carrying capacity of the earth would go down to just 1 billion, and then the discussion would be settled.”  And he has often said that this temperature tipping point would be reached — unless “actions” were taken.

Schellnhuber is also an unashamed globalist.  In a previous article, I discussed how he believes that we need a global government, a global constitution and a global court that would have authority over all the other courts on the planet.  The following is an excerpt from a very disturbing article that he authored

Let me conclude this short contribution with a daydream about those key institutions that could bring about a sophisticated — and therefore more appropriate — version of the conventional “world government” notion. Global democracy might be organized around three core activities, namely (i) an Earth Constitution; (ii) a Global Council; and (iii) a Planetary Court. I cannot discuss these institutions in any detail here, but I would like to indicate at least that:

the Earth Constitution would transcend the UN Charter and identify those first principles guiding humanity in its quest for freedom, dignity, security and sustainability;

the Global Council would be an assembly of individuals elected directly by all people on Earth, where eligibility should be not constrained by geographical, religious, or cultural quotas; and

the Planetary Court would be a transnational legal body open to appeals from everybody, especially with respect to violations of the Earth Constitution.

So why is Pope Francis surrounding himself with such people?

Does he have similar hopes for the future?

Without a doubt, the Pope’s latest encyclical fully embraces Schellnhuber’s views on climate change, but it doesn’t stop there.  The Pope also expressed a very negative view of human progress, and he appeared to be echoing many of the exact same talking points that radical environmentalists have been hammering us with for years.  The following comes from a recent article by Steven Malanga

The encyclical, whose title is derived from a line from St. Francis of Assisi’s Canticle of the Sun (“Be praised, My Lord, through all your Creatures”), is being welcomed by some in the scientific community because it proclaims that climate change is real and that humanity must address it. But the nearly 38,000-word document—most of which is not about climate change—actually reads like a giant step backward for the Church’s social teaching: a rejection of technological progress; a dark, narrow vision of human nature that ignores the enormous gains the world has made in alleviating human suffering; and an almost antihuman call, reminiscent of the most radical environmentalists, to reduce human activity drastically as the only way to save the planet. As Michael Shellenberger, president of the Breakthrough Institute and co-author of An Ecomodernist Manifesto, observed: “When [the] Pope speaks of ‘irrational faith in human progress’ I want him to visit the Congo to see what life is like when there is no progress.”

So what does all of this mean?

Could it be possible that this Pope is far more radical than most people ever imagined?

If so, what does that mean for the future of Catholicism?

Please feel free to tell us what you think by posting a comment below…

Michael T. Snyder is a graduate of the McIntire School of Commerce at the University of Virginia and has a law degree and an LLM from the University of Florida Law School. He is an attorney that has worked for some of the largest and most prominent law firms in Washington D.C. and who now spends his time researching and writing and trying to wake the American people up. You can follow his work on The Economic Collapse blog, End of the American Dream and The Truth Wins. His new novel entitled “The Beginning Of The End” is now available on

Obama DOJ In $29 Million Charleston Shooting Payout


On the late afternoon of Friday June 19 the Obama Justice Department led by new Attorney General Loretta Lynch announced it will “fast track” $29 million to victim families of the June 17 shooting at the Emmanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church in Charleston South Carolina, Reuters reports. The exorbitant payout amounts to over $3.2 million per family.

As widely reported in corporate news media, a prominent victim of the tragic shooting was career South Carolina political leader and Democratic Party operative Senator Clementa Pinckney. Pinckney was also pastor of the AME Church, and alongside Pickney four of the slain–Sharonda Coleman-Singleton, Depayne Middleton-Doctor, and Daniel Simmons Sr,–were AME reverends and officers.

“The massive Gothic structure” housing Charleston’s AME Church “suffers from severe structural deterioration resulting primarily from termite infestation” Church administrators were thus in dire need of funds for such repairs, the South Carolina Department of Archives and History observed in 2014.

Veteran 19-Year South Carolina Legislator Senator Clementa Pinckney [Image Credit: CNN]

Veteran 19-Year South Carolina Legislator Senator Clementa Pinckney [Image Credit: CNN]

DOJ spokesman Kevin Lewis stated that the funds are intended to “help families of victims of the mass murder of nine churchgoers at a historic black church in Charleston.”

An unknown portion of the money will be sent under the US national Crime Victim Assistance Formula Grant program, and may be used to provide services to the shooting victims’  families, the DOJ’s Lewis said.

The tragic church shooting took place on the same day Lynch was officially sworn in to office as the nation’s top law enforcement officer.

Between June 15 and 19, 2015 the Department of Homeland Security’s Federal Law Enforcement Training Center in Charleston was conducting The Active Shooter Threat Instructor Training Program, “designed to provide a field training agent or officer with high quality training and instill the analytical knowledge, skills and attitudes needed for the highest proficiency in this specialized field,” the course description reads. “The course takes Active Shooter Threat Tactics Training to the next level by emphasizing leadership, teach backs, and adult learning as well as the traditional technical skills needed by field training officers and special agents.”

President Obama meets with Attorney General Loretta Lynch in the Oval Office, April 27, 2015. [Image Credit: Official White House Photo]

President Obama meets with Attorney General Loretta Lynch in the Oval Office, April 27, 2015. [Image Credit: Official White House Photo]

In the wake of the December 14, 2012 Sandy Hook school massacre event overseen by the Department of Homeland Security Eric Holder’s DOJ funneled at least 9 million in federal money via the DOJ to the Newtown community for alleged services to victims’ families and the “trauma” experienced by first responders (e.g. here, here and here).

Such funding bolstered an unprecedented $50 million allocated by Connecticut Governor Dannell Malloy for the construction of a new Sandy Hook Elementary School contingent upon the leveling of the then-existing structure. Further, tens of millions were generated through a “Sandy Hook Charity Industry“–a vast array of independent charities purportedly soliciting funds on behalf of the families. The population of Newtown is 1,977, according to 2013 statistics.


Professor James F. Tracy is an Associate Professor of Media Studies at Florida Atlantic University. James Tracy’s work on media history, politics and culture has appeared in a wide variety of academic journals, edited volumes, and alternative news and opinion outlets. James is editor of Union for Democratic Communication’s Journal Democratic Communiqué and a contributor to Project Censored’s forthcoming publication Censored 2013: The Top Censored Stories and Media Analysis of 2011-2012. Additional writings and information are accessible at

How Turmeric Will Light Up The Future – Literally!

Can you imagine a computer or handheld device backlight or display of the future being lit up by a turmeric or pomegranate mixture? Imagine if an entirely edible source of white light could be generated with minimal environmental and human health impacts? The good news is that we no longer have to rely on our imagination. We now have the science to show it is indeed possible! 
What could be more unnatural and yet indispensable in the modern world than a light bulb? Made from metal, glass, and a variety of petrochemicals, who would even consider looking for a “green” alternative? And if so, what would that be?
Now, a groundbreaking new study published in Scientific Reports seems to have found exactly such a green solution. Amazingly, Indian researchers discovered that a mixture of two commonly consumed edible plants, red pomegranate and turmeric, when exposed to light wavelengths just below the visible threshold (380 nm), produced almost pure white light emission (WLE).
This finding represents a simple, cheap and environmentally safe alternative to current LED technology, which presently rely on toxic materials, including heavy metals such as arsenic, copper, nickel, and lead,  in their production.
In the new study titled “White Light Emission from Vegetable Extracts,” Indian researchers described how they were able to conveniently tune the color temperature of the WLE by adjusting the concentrations of the “the primary emitting pigments,” namely, anthocyanins from red pomegranate seed juice and curcumin extract from turmeric.
(click image to enlarge)
screen shot 2
One of the crucial mechanisms behind their ability to produce an almost pure white light emission was identified as “Foster resonance energy transfer” (FREF). FREF is a mechanism that describes energy transfer between two light-sensitive molecules (known as chromophores). The researchers identified A FRET-like, light-induced energy transfer cascade: polyphenolics > curcumin > anthocyanins, resulting in WLE.
The researchers were also able to create an entirely edible gelatin-based mixture of the plant extracts that was capable of emitting almost pure white light when exposed to UV light, depicted below.
screen shot
The researchers summarized their findings:
In summary, we have generated white light emission from natural dyes extracted in our laboratory using a green and simple procedure. The optimized mixture of two suitably chosen plant extracts using acidic  ethanol, aided by a FRET cascade from polyphenolics to curcumin to anthocyanins, generates almost  pure white light, with CIE values of (0.35, 0.33) in solution, (0.26, 0.33) in gelatin gel and (0.33, 0.25) in PVA film. White light emission from such cheap and nature friendly resources could be important in the context of lighting and sensing application. It would be interesting to see if such system can be used as dyes for tunable dye laser applications. To the best of our knowledge this is the first time low cost, biocompatible (edible) natural dyes have been a part of white light emitting system. Given the vast  number of excellent natural fluorescent dyes obtainable from renewable biosources, approaches similar to the present could lead to a more extensive range of low-cost and efficient WLE biomaterials with ease of adjusting colour temperature, which will obviate more expensive alternatives currently being pursued.” [emphasis added]
The researchers also described the context within which their finding may have revolutionary implications for future technology:
“White light emitting materials have attracted significant attention in recent years as key components in display and lighting devices based on LEDs. LEDs accounts for almost 20% of the total worldwide energy consumption and have wide applications in backlights, displays, lasers and indicators. White light emission has also been used for sensing. There has been a high level of interest in recent years in looking for white light emitting organic and inorganic molecules and materials, when photoexcited at near UV wavelengths.”
Clearly this study holds great promise for a sustainable future. We’ve already identified numerous properties within plants like turmeric and pomegranate which indicate they are far superior to conventional drug-based interventions for disease prevention and treatment. We are only now learning about the technological applications of these remarkable substances and it is likely we are still only scratching the surface.

Article Contributed by Sayer Ji, Founder of

Sayer Ji is an author, researcher, lecturer, and advisory board member of the National Health Federation. He founded in 2008 in order to provide the world an open access, evidence-based resource supporting natural and integrative modalities. It is internationally recognized as the largest and most widely referenced health resource of its kind.

Why Is NASA Working On A Way To Destroy Asteroids Using Nuclear Weapons?


Yes, I know that headline sounds like it comes from the 1998 movie “Armageddon” starting Bruce Willis, but this is actually happening.  NASA and the National Nuclear Security Administration are teaming up to try to figure out a way to use nuclear weapons to either destroy threatening asteroids or to at least nudge them off course.  This seems very odd considering the fact that just a couple of weeks ago NASA publicly announced that it knew of “no asteroid or comet currently on a collision course with Earth” and that “no large object is likely to strike the Earth any time in the next several hundred years“.  If what NASA told us previously is true, than it would seem that it would be a tremendous waste of time, money and resources to work on a way to destroy asteroids using nuclear weapons.  Why is NASA suddenly so interested in the threat of large asteroids if one is not likely to hit us “any time in the next several hundred years”?  Could it be possible that they know something that they are not telling us?

When I first heard that NASA was teaming up with the National Nuclear Security Administration to figure out a way to use nuclear weapons against asteroids, I immediately had flashbacks to two of my favorite movies from the 1990s – Deep Impact and Armageddon.  But it disturbs me that our “best minds” haven’t come up with any better ideas since those films first came out.  The following is from a New York Times article about this new development…

The two agencies — NASA and the National Nuclear Security Administration — have long studied such threats on their own. They have surveyed the cosmic debris, designed rocket interceptors and run supercomputer simulations to see if a nuclear blast could nudge a large asteroid off course.

In interviews, federal officials and private experts said the new interagency agreement would deepen the levels of expert cooperation and governmental planning, ultimately increasing the chances of a successful deflection.

“It’s a big step forward,” said Kevin Greenaugh, a senior official at the nuclear security agency. “Whenever you have multiple agencies coming together for the common defense, that’s news.”

It sounds like such a perfectly “American” solution, doesn’t it?

What should we do if a big threat is coming our way?

Just nuke it baby.

But as MSN has pointed out, blowing up a gigantic mountain of rock hurtling toward us at ultra-high speed could create an even bigger problem…

Computer simulations suggest that we could successfully blow up a medium-sized space rock. However, the resulting rock fragments could potentially make the situation worse, depending on how far the asteroid is from Earth when it explodes. A better solution might be to use the bomb to deflect the asteroid instead of blowing it to smithereens.

Other (non-nuclear) proposals include gravity tractors, using sunlight to “boil off” parts of the Near Earth Object, and using lasers or high-speed spacecraft to nudge the object off of its collision course with Earth. However, a 2007 NASA study indicated that nuclear solutions may be the best weapon we’ve got when it comes to fighting killer space rocks.

But this isn’t all that NASA has been up to.

Earlier this year, they conducted a “hypothetical asteroid impact scenario”.  The following is what the official NASA website has to say about that exercise…

At the 2015 IAA Planetary Defense Conference (PDC), to be held April 13 – 17, 2015 in Frascati, Italy, a hypothetical asteroid impact scenario will be presented and used as a basis for discussion. NOTE: Although this scenario is realistic in many ways, it is completely fictional and does NOT describe a real potential asteroid impact.

So why is NASA spending so much time and energy on something they say is probably not going to happen “any time in the next several hundred years”?

Of course the truth is that NASA is not being straight with us.  As the Daily Mail recently explained, there are approximately a million near-Earth objects that could potentially be a threat to our planet, and NASA only knows where a small percentage of them are…

Scientists believe there are around one million near-Earth asteroids that could pose a threat to our planet – but only a tiny fraction have so far been detected.

Dramatic proof that any of these can strike Earth came on 15 February last year, when an unknown object exploded high above Chelyabinsk, Russia, with 20 – 30 times the energy of the Hiroshima atomic bomb.

It is true that our ability to detect asteroids that can impact our planet has grown.  But it is still extremely limited.  Here is more from the Daily Mail

But existing asteroid detection systems can only track one percent of the estimated objects that orbit the sun, according to asteroid mining firm Planetary Resources, who is partnering with Nasa on the project.

In a session at the SXSW conference in Texas last year, Nasa scientist Jason Kessler said: ‘The likelihood of something hitting us in the future is pretty guaranteed, although we’re not freaking out that there is an imminent threat.’

Yes, without a doubt the chance that a giant space rock will hit us at some point in the future is indeed “pretty guaranteed”.  We know that giant asteroids have hit our planet in the past, and there was a pretty significant “near miss” just a few months ago that NASA did not see coming in advance.  I wish that they would just be honest with us.  NASA cannot see all of the giant space rocks that could be a threat to us, and they definitely should be spending time, money and resources on this problem.

Someday if a giant asteroid were to hit us in just the right spot, like just off the east coast of the United States for example, the consequences would be absolutely catastrophic.  We could suddenly be faced with a tsunami hundreds of feet high racing toward our major coastal cities.  For much more on this, please check out this article and this article.

Most people assume that a major asteroid strike is not a threat because one has not happened during any of our lifetimes.  But NASA would not be going to all of this trouble if this was something that they were not concerned about.

In the end, what they are not telling us could turn out to be far more of a problem than most of us ever imagined.

Michael T. Snyder is a graduate of the McIntire School of Commerce at the University of Virginia and has a law degree and an LLM from the University of Florida Law School. He is an attorney that has worked for some of the largest and most prominent law firms in Washington D.C. and who now spends his time researching and writing and trying to wake the American people up. You can follow his work on The Economic Collapse blog, End of the American Dream and The Truth Wins. His new novel entitled “The Beginning Of The End” is now available on

Domestic Slave Camps Authorized In Gov’t Documents. This Time It’s Roundups Of All Opposition (VIDEO)

fema camp

Don’t fool yourself into believing that the Supreme Court will never again allow a wartime violation of civil rights like it did in allowing internment camps for Japanese-Americans during World War II, those are the powerful words of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia in his address to law students at the University of Hawaii, and they couldn’t portray a more honest truth about where we are headed in the near future.

Governments have often displayed their true nature when times of war loomed on the horizon. Today is no different. We too are on the brink of major events. World War III is literally seconds away and talks of civil uprisings abound—both of which could potentially lead to a another phase of internment labor camp roundups here in America.

The video below proves through official government documentation that labor camps are about to unfold again.

“Once bright and shining in her youth, truly a land of the free and home of the brave, today’s mature America still stands straight but is slightly tarnished, with tears in her eyes, as she looks at a fast approaching future as “land of the enslaved and home of the indentured”…”


Operation Garden Plot 

Operation Garden Plot was a strategy developed by the U.S. Army and National Guard to respond to any domestic civil disturbance by allowing the Federal military to assist the state and local governments. In other words it’s an orderly takeover of the state and local governments by the Federal military, if deemed necessary.

EO 13603 (National Defense Resource preparedness) 

President Obama has signed more executive orders then any other president that has taken office. One in particular that stands out far about the rest is executive order 13603, also known as, National Defense Resource Preparedness. It was signed in 2011 and granted Obama not only the power to control all our resources, but it also allowed him to enact slave labor at the stroke of his pen.

Sec. 502 of of the executive order reads as follows:

Consultants.  The head of each agency otherwise delegated functions under this order is delegated the authority of the President under sections 710(b) and (c) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2160(b), (c), to employ persons of outstanding experience and ability without compensation and to employ experts, consultants, or organizations.  The authority delegated by this section may not be re-delegated.

That means Obamas delegated agencies can force people to perform assigned labor without being paid. It also makes it clear in Sec. 102 that this can happen during “peacetime or times of emergency.”

This executive order further allows government agencies to seize control over our valued resources.

Sec. 201 Priorities and Allocations reads as follows:

The authority of the President conferred by section 101 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2071, to require acceptance and priority performance of contracts or orders (other than contracts of employment) to promote the national defense over performance of any other contracts or orders, and to allocate materials, services, and facilities as deemed necessary or appropriate to promote the national defense, is delegated to the following agency heads:

(1) the Secretary of Agriculture with respect to food resources, food resource facilities, livestock resources, veterinary resources, plant  health resources, and the domestic distribution of farm equipment and commercial fertilizer;

(2) the Secretary of Energy with respect to all forms of energy;

(3) the Secretary of Health and Human Services with respect to health resources;

(4) the Secretary of Transportation with respect to all forms of civil transportation;

(5) the Secretary of Defense with respect to water resources; and

(6) the Secretary of Commerce with respect to all other materials, services, and facilities, including construction materials.

(b) The Secretary of each agency delegated authority under subsection (a) of this section (resource departments) shall plan for and issue regulations to prioritize and allocate resources and establish standards and procedures by which the authority shall be used to promote the national defense, under both emergency and non-emergency conditions.

One again regardless if it is an emergency or not, our resources can be allocated or prioritized.

Civilian Inmate Labor Program

This document provides guidance for establishing and managing CIVILIAN inmate Labor Programs on Army  Installations. It establishes PRISON Camps on Army Installations and further addresses record keeping and reporting incidents related to the Civilian Inmate/Labor Program and or Prison Camp administration.

Page 2- Lists ways the labor program “benefits” the Army and Corrections systems including: labor at no cost for jobs others don’t want to do.

Page 4- The establishment of CIVILIAN Labor Camps. Not “prison camps for inmates” but clearly it’s for civilians.

Page 5- No payment for labor. Plus A list of types of inmates now allowed to be in the labor programs including: crime figures, sex violations, drug use, arson, mental issues, an escape risk… Notice every possible crime is listed here, therefore the ones left to be part of the “labor Program” are those who have committed No crime. Thus this means it’s not just inmates but Civilians and your average Joe! Future Crimes could be “reading Bible” “Being Veteran” “A Christian” etc.

Page 7- Inmates can’t use phone, computer, etc. Army personnel who are heading up and guarding the inmates will be trained and indoctrinated.

Page 8- Quote:  “These prison camps will house minimum and low security inmates, as determined by the correctional systems. However, the Army’s primary purpose for allowing establishment of prison camps on Army installations is to use the resident nonviolent civilian inmate labor pool to work on the leased portions of the installation.”

Page 9- States difference between “Civilian inmate prison camp” and an civilian inmate labor program”

Page 11- Records will be kept on how much money they earn from these civilian labor camps.

Page14- Copy of Memorandum Agreement signed between Civilian correction facility and the name and location of Army Organization requesting work.

Page 20- Inmate Labor Program agreement.

Page 22- Inmates wear distinctive work uniforms. Inmates not allowed to socialize. Media will not be allowed to share about program unless given prior written permission.

Page 26- Definition of Civilian Inmate: “Prisoners incarcerated in a Federal, State, or local government penal facility. Prisoners of a military confinement facility are not civilian inmates.”


Lisa Haven is an independent Christian news analysis and one of the top contributors on She is also author of and runs her own youtube channel (Lisa Haven) with tens-of-thousands of views per day. Digging deep and finding truth is what she lives for. Her passion is to spread truth no matter where it lies. She covers everything from martial law, to FEMA camps, to end time bible prophecy, to government documents and much more! Before launching her journalism career, she wrote many bible studies and lead women ministries for a number of years. She will also complete her ministry degree at International School of Ministry this year.

Gold And Silver – Three Choices: Sell, Hold, Hold And Add. A Trading Treatise.

By: Edge Trader Plus |

Last year, the rage was the record-setting number of coins various mints were selling to the public, such an incredible demand that would surely impact the demand factor for gold and silver.  Then the focus changed to how many tones China and Russia were buying each and every month, scooping up all available supply with their insatiable demand.  Gold and silver responded by going lower.

The most popular gold/silver sites, the most respected gold/silver analysts from around the world all chiming in how gold and silver will go through the roof while both metals continue to still languish in the basement, as it were.

Who has not heard $5,000 gold, $10,000, even $50,000 gold by an exuberant few?  Same for silver, $200, $400, $1,000.  During all this time, gold has yet to hold above $1,230, silver above $18.  There is a huge gap between current prices and unfulfilled pie-in-the-sky price projections.  This has caused much disappointment, even delusion by some because the sum of their purchases were often under water.  Huge imagined profits actually became real [unrealized] losses.  [This does not mean they cannot become profitable]

We wrote a little in-house commentary, last week, Adapting To Changing Markets, to reflect how we have chosen a more focused approach to the short-term aspect of the markets, questioning the validity of the existence of free-trading markets, anymore. The elite’s central bankers have virtually taken over almost all the Western world’s financial dealings and markets.  A few, like crude oil, have become political tools.

The article is worth a read to understand the context of this commentary and how one should be in greater control of their financial destiny in these markets.  The situation being what it is for the PMs crowd, there are three simple choices available.  For those unhappy where the price for gold and silver are trading, sell, get out.  Take a loss and move on and quit complaining.  Life is too short, [unless you remain long gold and silver and have been awaiting a rally, then life has been long for the longs.]

You can hold what you have and remember the reasons for buying and accumulating either metal, or both.  Attendant with the hold strategy is to keep on adding at these low prices, while recognizing that low can still go lower.  The reasons for buying have not changed.  In fact, they have gotten worse, and the ultimate outcome is a virtual guarantee that prices will go higher.  What has been so difficult for most is the no guarantee as to when, and this gets into the context of our little commentary about adapting to market changes.

For the past few years, we have refrained from the long side of the PMs market, at least the  paper portion.  We have not hesitated to recommend buying and holding the physical metals for many cited reasons.  As buyers, we are still long physical silver from as high as $47, and gold from as high as $1,800.  Are we satisfied with our purchases?  Definitely.  Are we concerned/disappointed about some purchases at much higher prices?  Not at all.

The reasons for buying were to protect against what seemed to be the shortening prospects of a collapsing fiat Federal Reserve “dollar” and the Western banking system.  It is no different from buying home insurance to protect against fire/water/natural forces.  Do you get upset when you look at your canceled checks and bemoan how you spent money on insurance and did not get to use it?  Enough on the issue of holding PMs.

What everyone could benefit from is developing a set of rules for engaging in the markets.  Why have rules?  Rules put a market into a defined context.  They serve as a guide to becoming successful in trading, and is that not the primary purpose for trading in the various markets?  More importantly, having a defined and written set of rules will remove you from the emotional element of the markets few consider.  Markets Are Neutral!

Almost all traders/stock participants develop some kind of emotional relationship with the markets.  Many have a fear of them, cannot understand them, worry about what a market can do to them.  “The market stopped me out.”  “The market took my money.”  “The market was rough on me, today.”  You probably have your own similar kind of sentiment.  All are wrong!  It is the driving factor why rules are so  necessary.

What is a market?  It is a clearinghouse of information of the interaction between all buyers and sellers.  All a market can do is generate information in the form of price and volume.  That’s it!  The markets are neutral, devoid of feeling.  Does the market know or care what you buy/sell, when you buy/sell, and at what price?  Absolutely not.  You are the one that makes these determinations.  They may result from the market information you see, but the decisions made are your own interpretations/perceptions and resulting beliefs about your expectations of what will develop, and that is where dysfunctional emotions get attached.

If you are experiencing fear of loss, disappointment in how the market is “behaving,” and the market is neutral, then from where are those feeling coming?  From you!  Any kind of emotional attachment is self-generating because the market is in control, you are not.  The question is, why not?

What if you had a set of rules for participating in the market.  Let us start with just one, a simple one:  Rule 1:  “I will only trade in the direction of the trend.”  If the trend is down, my rule says I cannot buy.  If gold and silver have been in a down trend, I cannot be a buyer, period.  On that basis, one could not have traded in the futures for the past four years, and it is this reason why we have kept advocating not to be long futures.  It does not get any simpler.

“This looks like a great buying opportunity.”  “The market is oversold.”  “It has to go higher from here,” etc, etc, etc.  What is the trend?  Down.  Who cares if it looks like a great buy opportunity?  Who cares if it is oversold?  It does not have to go higher from a certain level.  Ask how many thought gold and silver could not go lower three years ago, two years ago, a year ago, a month ago?  Anyone buying had the weight of market momentum going against them and the greater likelihood of taking a loss.  Was it the market’s fault for those making a bad decision to buy in a down trend?

Let us look at more complex issues but all based on the premise of the necessity of having a clearly defined set of rules.

How many have been saying the Fed’s fiat “dollar” is going to collapse, become worthless? Maybe the “dollar” will collapse and become worthless, but what do the charts say?  The trend is obviously higher.  The flip side of Rule 1 is, if the trend is up, I will not sell [short].

In recognition of the trend, our comments from two weeks ago, [1st and 2nd Chart] were to focus on how buyers were keeping sellers from pushing price lower and opening the door for a rally.  We said the daily told a clearer “story.”

 (Click graphs to enlarge)DX-W-27-Jun-15

Markets are constantly testing and retesting support/resistance areas.  With this knowledge, one can devise more rules that give rise to trade opportunities that are in harmony with the trend, [which vastly increases the odds of a successful trade].

On many occasions, we have mentioned how a market reacts to support or resistance will provide important information.  Price retested a swing low from May.  How did it respond?  Volume remained relatively high, the close was near the high of the day, and this tells us buyers overwhelmed sellers at support setting up a buy opportunity.

Note that bar at support [arrow].  You will see this kind of pattern repeat in the markets over and over and over.  All you need to is to develop a set of rules for how to enter into  a trade under these market conditions: up trend, support tested and held, increased volume and a strong close.  The probability for price to go higher under these and similar conditions is greater than not.

How do you think your trading results would be if you traded nothing but this kind of pattern set up with the trend?  What you would quickly realize is that you would be in control, not the market.  If the market does not show you this kind of pattern, you do not make a trade.  What can the market do to you otherwise?  Nothing.  You have nothing to fear from the market because the market activity is not what you require.

Not every trade will necessarily result in a profit, but over a series of trades you will make money, guaranteed.  But you must have a defined set of rules that captures these kinds of trading opportunities.


There also has to be rules for exiting.  Trading multiple contracts, one can scale out of a position and lock in profits to reduce risk exposure.  The reason for taking partial profits on the rally that followed the pattern buy signal came from a resistance area where we added a horizontal line that show where/why the rally stopped/paused.  The last two small range bars show how the sellers are unable to push price lower, and the reaction, so far, has been weak.  Weak reactions lead to higher prices.  The trend favors higher prices.  It is not a guarantee, but the odds of continuation are greater than not.

You always want the odds in your favor.  How do you get the odds in your favor?  Have a fixed set of rules to take advantage of market set ups, and there are so many kinds, and they all repeat over and over and over.  We cannot say that enough, so we repeat.


Unusually large spikes in volume are generated by controlling interests, smart money, however you want to reference these monied participants.  They are typically a transfer of positions from weak into strong hands.  The public it too disparate to unify into a collective pack and move volume in a concerted effort, so it is always smart money doing the moving.  Also, note where the volume spike occur…almost always at market tops/bottoms, swing highs/lows, important support/resistance areas.

This volume spike is near an important low, and more importantly, in this particular instance, it is occurring at the RHS [Right Hand Side] of a protracted TR.  The farther price moves along the RHS of a TR, the closer it is to resolve [ending].  We may be getting an important clue here.  Will the daily provide more detail?


There are several things going on here.  First, let us acknowledge the potential for a set up that is very similar to that discussed in the fiat “dollar” chart, above.  Prior week’s support is what we showed in the prior week’s chart.  Another horizontal support line was added, [dashed line], to show how support is an area, sometimes layers and not just a single price, as many opt to use.

Price spiked lower, last Friday, retesting the March low and briefly going under the retest from late April, but note how price rallied strongly into the close on higher than average volume.  Tuesday had a larger spike volume to the downside, but the close of Friday was higher than the close from Tuesday, and we infer from that that the Tuesday spike volume was strong hands buying, weak hands selling.

Everything needs to be confirmed, which means Friday’s bar where buyers overwhelmed sellers and took control needs to have a positive retest.  It could be brief, subtle, and on occasion, not at all.  One can never know, nor does one need to know.  Just follow the established rules, and everything will work out.


Silver’s positively developing activity yielded a closer look at how gold was developing, and we took a more focused note that the TR since the end of March has been holding like a rock above the March retest swing low.  The entire TR is a retest and one that is holding well, under the circumstances.

It is possible gold and silver are starting to see a change in sentiment.


Gold daily shows what we keep saying and something of which you should always be aware: markets are always testing and retesting, and in the process, these test can leave behind important clues.  There was a retest of the recent low in May and a lower retest in June, but the June violation of the May swing low was brief.  In fact, maybe you can recognize the character of the June retest.  We did not label it as a retest pattern as was noted in the “dollar” and silver charts, but that is what it is.  You can see how not all retests are exactly the same, but they respond similarly.

What makes gold’s retest from Friday of greater interest is the manner in which is was much more obvious in silver.  Lastly, the spike in volume, arrow bar, ostensibly shows a strong rally and close on strong volume, collectively a positive statement.  Sometimes, the volume can have the opposite effect where sellers have “hidden” in the rally but really took control from the buyers, and price moved lower, at leaf for a bit.

The net effect has been to show how one should always be reading the market from its perspective, based on the market’s activity and what message[s] it may be conveying.  Then, armed with a set of rules, impose them on the market and decide not to engage unless and until your rules of activity are being respected, presenting you with an edge.

Trading is a business and needs to be treated like one where you are the center of every decision.


Something Bad Is About To Happen: Exposing What The Elite Know That We Don’t (VIDEO)


Have you ever had a gut feeling that something big and possible bad is right around the corner? If you have, you’re not the only one! The feeling seems to be in the air. We know it, the elite know it, the pentagon knows it, and even our military knows it.

I believe a great evil is about to befall not only our nation, by the entire world. Something major is unfolding and everyone knows it. The economy is unstable, the world is on the brink of war, the elite are running to their bunkers, and governments are planning for mass civil breakdown. Far too many things are on the forefront and one must ask themselves, “What the heck is going on?”

I HIGHLY encourage you to watch the video below in its entirety. This is probably one of the most important videos I’ve done because it shares what I believe could play out in the very NEAR future and I use sources and government documents to back up my claim. This is one video you don’t want to miss…

For More Information See:

Pentagon Studies Protestors to Prepare For Civil Breakdown (2014):

Mass Civil Breakdown in the Future:

Pentagon Prepares for Economic Breakdown:

US Prepares for Something BIG (2014):

Military Prepares for Economic Collapse:

Science Report out put by scientists at Stanford, Princeton and Berkeley:

Elite Prepare For Something Big:

11 Top Economists Predicting Crash:

Scientists Predict 60% Stock Market Crash:

Banks Prepare:

Elite Move to Bunkers:

Civil Disturbance Document:

Civil Disturbance Operations Document:

Internment and Resettlement:

Project Megiddo:

Lisa Haven is an independent Christian news analysis and one of the top contributors on She is also author of and runs her own youtube channel (Lisa Haven) with tens-of-thousands of views per day. Digging deep and finding truth is what she lives for. Her passion is to spread truth no matter where it lies. She covers everything from martial law, to FEMA camps, to end time bible prophecy, to government documents and much more! Before launching her journalism career, she wrote many bible studies and lead women ministries for a number of years. She will also complete her ministry degree at International School of Ministry this year.