Category Archives: Government Control

Candidates Ready To Trash Constitution To Fight ISIS: “Time To Put Life Ahead Of Civil Liberties”


By: Mac Slavo, |

Never mind who poked at the hive and stirred up an angry storm. Those are lessons of blowback for those with memory and perspective.

Right now the reactionary fervor is all that matters. Indeed, it is difficult to focus on much else.

In hindsight, the nation became sick and tired of the wars and the fear over terrorism under the reign of Bush 43. But in the moment, people embraced it – and that’s the danger again.

There is no clear or rational thought under fear of attack.

Under the auspices of retribution for 9/11, George W. Bush and his neocon advisors launched a roaming War on Terror that brought conflict to entire regions, and didn’t blink at bending the rules or trampling on constitutional rights. Spying, surveillance, intimidation, snitching, databasing, airport pat-downs, stop and frisk on the streets and more were all tolerated and even embraced. It was rule by fear.

The narrative didn’t add up, but that didn’t matter until later for most. People began to regret the powers granted via the PATRIOT Act to the NSA and to the executive branch to indefinitely detain anyone they declared an enemy combatant. The slide down the slippery slope was accelerating at a queasy pace.

Today, new threats from ISIS are dragging the United States dangerously close to this point again.

The one-man show that is Donald Trump, who quickly made a mockery of the GOP primary, is calling for databases and surveillance of all Muslim immigrants. Other GOP candidates are making similar proposals, eager to look toughest on this unfortunate issue. RT reports:

Donald Trump, running high in polls, proposes cataloging all Muslims living in the United States to ensure they are under constant surveillance.

“I would certainly implement that [keeping a register of Muslims]…absolutely,” Trump told NBC, adding that there are “a lot of systems, beyond databases” that could be implemented. “We should have a lot of systems. And today you can do it,” Trump said, clearly with nod in the direction of the National Security Agency (NSA) and its unprecedented surveillance capabilities.

And though the policies of opening the doors to these “refugees” is deeply flawed – and indeed invites attack from jihadists or foreign enemies – the destruction of civil rights for this group will soon harm those of every American.

It seems that someone, from one party or another, is eager to finish what Bush started, and Obama has quietly continued.

Hillary Clinton is now the only real nominee for the Democratic nomination; she has already sounded off on her plans for tougher policies and new strikes on ISIS and other targets overseas.

Now, one of her top donors, billionaire Haim Saban, has gone on the offensive, literally calling to curb civil liberties in order to meet the perceived threat of attack from ISIS. Mind you, this time, the country hasn’t even been attacked yet:

[B]illionaire entertainment mogul and major party donor Haim Saban, who donated a seven-digit sum to Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign, telling news website The Wrap it is high time to reconsider values and put life ahead of civil liberties.

Saban referred to those members of the Hollywood community who are fervently liberal and appear to value civil freedoms more than they value life.

“I disagree with that [liberal view]. You want to be free and dead? I’d rather be not free and alive,” Saban said, adding that at ‘a time of war’, interviewing Muslim refugees and migrants in a more intense way than Christians is acceptable, as well as “listening in on anyone and everybody who looks suspicious.”

If warhawks are pouring millions (and billions) into the Clinton campaign, you can imagine that they probably want a return for their money. None of this bodes well for the next four years… or any foreseeable time afterwards.

If the ‘terrorists hated us for our freedoms’ then, they should have little reason to target us now…

It is no exaggeration to say that the response by the U.S. government to the acts of terrorism, including those on September 11, have done far more destruction to its system of freedom and prosperity than bin Laden, 19 hijackers with box cutters, or drama queens from ISIS ever could.

Illustration: David Dees

Illustration: David Dees

Brandon Smith of Alt-Market has a great perspective on this – the bait and switch to convince Americans to sell their own birthright and volunteer for their own servitude.

Today, the people of the U.S. are less prosperous in real wealth, in income and in opportunities than at any other time in history. Nearly half of the country is directly dependent on the federal government benefits for day-to-day survival, and the disaster of foreign policy continues to eviscerate the Constitution and bring decline to the American empire – all while the population lives in fear and abject terror of what may come tomorrow.

A new darkness could be closing in.

No jobs, no independence, no freedom, no future – but if the government doesn’t get more power… well, conventional wisdom says it would be better to be enslaved than dead. Others know the wisdom and the strength of Liberty or death.

Top Secret Documents Expose Sickening Move By Big Brother—They’ll Literally Control Humanity Into Global Slavery! (VIDEOS)


Every once in a while you come across a government document or report that holds imperative and quite frankly frightening information. In the video below I dive through two documents that portray an overall agenda of what the elite have in mind for our country. To be honest I couldn’t help but get upset about the information I discovered and it will make your blood boil as you discover 100% proof from government sources on what they intend to do by 2025 with microchip technology, the evidence is indisputable….

The government has shown interest in mind-control, brain-chip technology for some time now, and quite frankly these types of inventions can have its dangerous uses. The two documents I covered in the video above prove that the Department of Defense has already drawn up plans to use such neural interfaces on not only the military, but also on the population. Their goal is to have it all in place by 2025.

Here are two staggering quotes from the Human Performance document I discussed in the video above:

“The most successful implementation of invasive interfaces [a direct communication pathway, done via surgery, between the brain and an external device] has occurred in medical applications in which nerve signals are used as the mechanism for information transfer. Adversarial actions using this approach to implement enhanced, specialized sensory functions could be possible in limited form now, and with developing capability in the future” (Human Performance page 77)

They go on to admit the dangers of microchip implants

“…an extreme example would be remote guidance or control of a human being.” (page 70)

The other document, Information Operations a New War Fighting Capability, goes in further detail about these implants and attempts to make their case by saying that the device helps increase security all while saying it doesn’t require any security measures:

“…An implanted microscopic chip does not require security measures to verify whether the right person is connected to the IIC, whereas a room, helmet, or sunglasses requires additional time-consuming access control mechanisms to verify an individual’s identity and level of control within the Cyber Situation.” (pg. 35)

They further go on to state that the population will accept it, and then they liken it to a “virtual video game” experience:

The civilian populace will likely accept an implanted microscopic chips that allow military members to defend vital national interests.” (Pg. 36)

“These advances will help restore patients with damaged neural, audio, and visual systems as well as enable individuals to achieve the “ultimate virtual reality trip.” (page 24)

information operation

Trouble is also likely headed our way with the discovery of a patent that has been put out with the technological capabilities to monitor and control human thoughts without the use of speech.  This technology is highly controversial—to say the least—but it draws an awful slippery slope between human control and free will.

According to the patent’s abstract:

A system and method for enabling human beings to communicate by way of their monitored brain activity. The brain activity of an individual is monitored and transmittedto a remote location (e.g. by satellite). At the remote location, the monitored brain activity is compared with pre-recorded normalized brain activity curves, waveforms, or patterns to determine if a match or substantial match is found. If such a match is found, then the computer at the remote location determines that the individual was attempting to communicate the word, phrase, or thought corresponding to the matched stored normalized signal.”

Did you catch that? “Enabling humans to communicate by way of their Monitored brain activity.”  This might just sound like a huge technological feat but it doesn’t end there. One of the objectives listed by this patent is the following:

“It is another object of this invention to provide a system capable of identifying particular nodes in an individual’s brain, the firings of which affect characteristics such as appetite, hunger, thirst, communication skills (e.g. which nodes are utilized to communicate certain words such as “yes”, “no”, or phrases such as “I don’t know”, “I’m not sure”, or numbers such as “one”, “two”, “ten”, “one hundred” and the like), thought processes, depression, and the like). When such nodes are identified, they may be specifically monitored by one or more sensors to analyze behavior or communication or words, phrases, or thoughts. In other embodiments, devices mounted to the person (e.g. underneath the scalp) may be energized in a predetermined manner or sequence to remotely cause particular identified brain node(s) to be fired in order to cause a predetermined feeling or reaction in the individual, such as lack of hunger, lack or depression, lack or thirst, lack of aggression, lack of alzheimer’s disease effects, or the like.

I don’t know about you but that sounds like mind control on steroids!!!

The video below delves into the patent in detail and I urge you with everything in me to watch it in its entirety….

“He was granted power to give breath to the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak and cause as many as would not worship the image of the beast to be killed. He causes all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their foreheads, and that no one may buy or sell except one who has the mark or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

Here is wisdom. Let him who has understanding calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man: His number is 666.” Revelation 13:15-18

For More Information See:

Human Performance Neural Interface document (pdf) –

Information Operations Document (Pdf)-

DARPA Today:\

The Patent:

Lisa Haven is an independent Christian news analysis and one of the top contributors on She is also author of and runs her own youtube channel (Lisa Haven) with tens-of-thousands of views per day. Digging deep and finding truth is what she lives for. Her passion is to spread truth no matter where it lies. She covers everything from martial law, to FEMA camps, to end time bible prophecy, to government documents and much more! Before launching her journalism career, she wrote many bible studies and lead women ministries for a number of years. She will also complete her ministry degree at International School of Ministry this year.

Pew Research Poll: 40% of Millennials Want To Restrict Free Speech

free speech

By: Joshua Krause, The Daily Sheeple |

Pew Research recently surveyed a broad selection of Americans on the subject of offensive speech, and their findings do not bode well for the future of America. The respondents were asked if the government should step in to prevent speech that is offensive toward minorities, to which 28% of Americans agreed. Mind you, this wasn’t about speech that called for violence against minorities. It’s anything that could be deemed “offensive,” an increasingly vague and inclusive term in this day and age.

What was more shocking however, was how different generations of Americans thought about the issue. 40% of millennials aged 18-34 thought that the government should prevent people from saying these things, which appears to be the latest in a long-term trend that favors free speech restrictions. Only 12% of those between the ages of 70-87, 24% of those aged 51-69, and 27% of Americans aged 35-50, supported government restrictions.

When the statistics were broken down by education level, those with college degrees had the lowest support, whereas those who had a high school degree or less were the most supportive. Depending on how you look at that, it either suggests that younger Americans are less enthusiastic about free speech rights than the generation that came before, or those who want to restrict speech aren’t as educated. Pew also found that woman and minorities were more likely to support government intervention, as were Democrats and Independents.

The only good news to come out of the survey, is that Americans still support free speech more than the citizens of other nations. “Compared with people we surveyed in dozens of nations, Americans as a whole are less likely to favor the government being able to prevent speech of any kind.” However, given the trends that we see in this poll, it doesn’t sound like Americans will be very tolerant of free speech in the future.

Joshua Krause is a reporter, writer and researcher at The Daily Sheeple. He was born and raised in the Bay Area and is a freelance writer and author. You can follow Joshua’s reports at Facebook or on his personal Twitter. Joshua’s website is Strange Danger.

Government Criminalizing Rainwater Collection In All Out War On Self Sufficiency


By: Phillip Schneider, Waking Times |

Collecting rainwater is classically seen as a safe and sustainable way of supplying your household with an off-the-grid water supply. Some people collect rainwater only for a backup reservoir, while others prefer to go all the way and maintain their household with pure off-the-grid rainwater collection. This method ensures water during emergencies, can help control floods, saves money and liberates us from company-dependence for our water.

Consequently, this freedom to collect our own rainwater is currently under attack. State laws have been set up in several U.S. States including Oregon, Utah, California, Florida, Colorado and Washington that prohibit the collection, or “diversion” of rainwater, including water that is falling on your own property and is to be used for your own private use or as an environmental conservation technique.

This idea of state-owned rainwater is opposed both by environmentalists on the left, and libertarians and constitutionalists on the right, and even historical figures such as Chief Seattle when he allegedly said during his 1854 oration to the European colonists “how can you own the rain?” Supporters are mainly governments and collectivists who tend to lean toward ideologies that sacrifice individual liberties.

Although it seems commonsense that the water that falls on your own property would of course belong to you, state governments increasingly challenge that idea with legislation demanding that your water doesn’t belong to you. It belongs to them, they say, and if you want to use “their” water then you first have to obtain a “Water Right” – and if you are denied this right, the water that falls on your own property (even if you need it) will be illegal to use – you will be thrown in jail or fined for the use of that water. You are now a Water Criminal.

Take for example the story of Gary Harrington, an Oregon man who had three ponds, or what the Oregon State Water Managers called “three illegal reservoirs” of water on his more than 170 acres of land. Harrington was reportedly sentenced to 30 days in jail and fined over $1,500 for having these “illegal reservoirs” on his property. The state claims that he is “diverting” water from Big Butte Creek, but he argues that he was only collecting the rainwater that falls on his own property, which later falls into to the creek.

CNS News reports:

“They’ve just gotten to be big bullies and if you just lay over and die and give up, that just makes them bigger bullies. So, we as Americans, we need to stand on our constitutional rights, on our rights as citizens and hang tough. This is a good country, we’ll prevail,” he said.

This issue is not isolated and it’s happening more than ever. Increasingly, people are being banned from all kinds of off-the-grid activities such as camping on their own property or heating your home with wood. Residents of Colorado, Florida and California have all had similar experiences to Harrington. Robin Rutan, an off-the-grid resident, reportedly told Colorado Public Radio “We’ve been regulated out of life” and that “I came here because I couldn’t live by the codes [in other regions].”

Another Colorado resident said “We are residents who have come to live off the grid. It’s all our land…These are harsh economic times. We have nowhere to go”. Residents of California are having increasingly harder time due to these “water laws” in wake of the drought that is taking place there.

Many people of the world still utilize rainwater as a major water source, such as the people of Singapore (28 to 33% of total water used), Indonesia, Bangladesh, Thailand, Hawaii and more. A Colorado study reveals that “With rainwater harvesting, outdoor water demand is reduced by approximately 65% with moderate conservation and approximately 88% with water wise conservation.” showing that collecting rainwater helps the environment through conservation and reduces dependency on company water.


Phillip Schneider is a student and a contributing author to Waking Times.

Bottom Line From The Paris Global Warming Summit


The political climate after the carnage in Paris has shifted the main stream media’s attention to terrorism, security concerns and foreigner migration, disguised as refugees. The climate change cultists are not under the same spotlight, before the blood flowed in the streets of the City of Light. Even the twisted attempt At Democratic Debate, Bernie Sanders Says Climate Change Helps Terrorism Spread, is not rejected out of hand.

 “Sanders backed up his statement by mentioning what “the CIA says,” a likely reference to a July 2015 report from the U.S. Department of Defense that found “global climate change will aggravate problems such as poverty, social tensions, environmental degradation, ineffectual leadership and weak political institutions that threaten stability in a number of countries,” according to a news release.”

Just how more bizarre can the prevarications become to establish a linkage to most absurd arguments to rationalize the immediate need to accept global governance to save the planet?

What exactly will be the details decided on at this much promoted conference. The BBC reports, UN agrees draft text for Paris climate summit. A copy of the draft text is available from this link.

The United Nations Newsroom wants you to believe that the Draft Climate Change Agreement Forwarded to Paris, has universal agreement. “The draft text of the agreement enjoys full ownership by the governments of the world and represents a balanced text that will constitute the starting point for the final round of negotiations.”

However, the actual goal that may be ultimately  agreed upon is falling just as fast as colder temperatures that is ushering in the new ice age.

Reuters announces that the U.N. climate deal in Paris may be graveyard for 2C goal.

“Paris will be a funeral without a corpse,” said David Victor, a professor of international relations at the University of California, San Diego, who predicts the 2C goal will slip away despite insistence by many governments that is still alive.

Christiana Figueres, the U.N.’s top climate change official, acknowledges that national plans for emissions curbs – the building blocks for the Paris accord – won’t be enough for 2C.”

If one can believe the spin that comes out of the Obama administration, maybe when John Kerry Says Paris Climate Deal Will Not Be Legally Binding, for once he could be telling the truth.

“A crunch climate summit in Paris will not deliver a legally binding treaty requiring countries to cut carbon emissions, US Secretary of State John Kerry told the Financial Times on Wednesday.

“It’s definitively not going to be a treaty… They’re not going to be legally binding reduction targets like Kyoto or something.”

Well, treaties require Senate confirmation, so another unconstitutional executive order surely will be the dictate of choice. This Paris Summit is chilling in its objective and implications for all inhabitants who are striving to hold on to even a minimum standard of living.

The economic consequences clearly will bolster the mega elites as they impose their new monopolies of global propositions. When US climate deniers call Paris summit ‘a threat’ to the world, their argument is denigrated and censored from public availability. Do a simple Google search for evidence that opposition to the “Climate Change” faith is banned by the algorithm purity of globalist cabal.

“Fred Singer, a retired rocket scientist who rejects the science underlining climate change, appeals for at least $425,000 (£270,212) to stop what he called the “radical, economy-wrecking and sovereignty-destroying UN climate pact”.

Oh my, such heresy slipped into the universe of controlled reality.

Heed the warning and assessment of Monckton: Harper defeat in Canada election will allow “world government” win at UN Paris climate meet.

“With Harper out of the way, warned Monckton, world governance will finally begin with a successful December, 2015 Paris Climate Conference. Another major factor for the Climate treaty’s likely success this time, after many past failures, is the unprecedented, strong public support of the Roman Catholic Church under Pope Francis.”

Some devastating framework will be announced as a success from the Paris Summit. Maybe it is not too late to get Bernie Sanders to provide a corollary on terrorism to be added to the global warming mission so that the unconverted climate deniers would accept the path to universal rule.

The corporatist cartel that runs the international economy plays a tune of global governance. Their music requires worldwide obedience. Unable to validate their phony science methods and claiming deceitful and contrived conclusions is not enough to get all-inclusive acceptance.

The globalist game plan is exposed in Paris – UN Climate Fraud Summit And Terrorist Attack – A “Coincidence” For Kerry And Obama To Exploit, Build On?

“Obama and his comrades are slated to slither into the sewer of the COP21 climate fraud convention in early December to orchestrate the end of individual nations and create a one world government. The thin veil of false climate claims can’t hide what is truly happening.”

It is so preposterous to profess that climate change is the supreme threat to the planet, when their emotional sentiments are so willing to sacrifice humankind to the cesspool of a condemned existence.

Pray tell the loony left decries the .001% super rich, but are so eager to accept the methodical destruction of upward economic mobility that is the inevitable result from technocratic theories for imposing a utopia that will only benefit the global elite.

Bottom line, the latest false flag terrorist plot facilitates the coordinated effort to accept a New World Order, under the fig leaf of United Nations jurisdiction. The economic dissolution that would follow from slapping unaffordable taxation and costs in an unattainable quest for reversing solar cycles manifests the lethal fallacies that fuel the mindset of the ruling elite.

The Paris Global Warming Summit will not usher in a brotherhood of man. The ‘Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité’ of Climate Change will only produce a global Rothschild empire that would put Napoleon to shame.

SARTRE is the pen name of James Hall, a reformed, former political operative. This pundit’s formal instruction in History, Philosophy and Political Science served as training for activism, on the staff of several politicians and in many campaigns. A believer in authentic Public Service, independent business interests were pursued in the private sector. As a small business owner and entrepreneur, several successful ventures expanded opportunities for customers and employees. Speculation in markets, and international business investments, allowed for extensive travel and a world view for commerce. He is retired and lives with his wife in a rural community. “Populism” best describes the approach to SARTRE’s perspective on Politics. Realities, suggest that American Values can be restored with an appreciation of “Pragmatic Anarchism.” Reforms will require an Existential approach. “Ideas Move the World,” and SARTRE’S intent is to stir the conscience of those who desire to bring back a common sense, moral and traditional value culture for America. Not seeking fame nor fortune, SARTRE’s only goal is to ask the questions that few will dare … Having refused the invites of an academic career because of the hypocrisy of elite’s, the search for TRUTH is the challenge that is made to all readers. It starts within yourself and is achieved only with your sincere desire to face Reality. So who is SARTRE? He is really an ordinary man just like you, who invites you to join in on this journey. Visit his website at

Global Banks Carve Up The World Ahead Of COP21


By: Rusticus, Stateless Homesteading |

As individuals and Nations alike wait in anticipation for COP21 a month from now, described as the United Nations’ “legally binding and universal” update to the ever-deleterious Agenda 21, banksters at the supranational level have shown little hesitation in offering their seemingly sage opinions on how their usurious reserves will be put to use in enacting this “Global Sustainable New Deal.”

From veterans of monetary Technocracy like the IMF and World Bank to the “New Kids on the Trading Bloc” represented by the BRICS and AIIB, monetary institutions around the world are poised to receive their slice of the sustainable pie – at the expense of what little freedom and financial security the individual still retains.

Leading the charge on the Western front is none other than the Bank for International Settlements, the “central bank of central banks” as identified by Georgetown Professor Carroll Quigley in his magnum opus Tragedy and Hope. Echoing the credo of “sustainable developers” at the UN and World Bank, the BIS has seen fit to reinforce the meme that the problem of climate change cannot be tackled without complete digital serfdom in the form of an electronic, biometric global I.D.

Euphemistically entitled the “Identification for Development” (or ID4D) program by the World Bank, it represents their “unique” interpretation of the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals; a reading that’s as draconian as it is creative. The UN, World Bank, and BIS are calling for nothing short of a completely pervasive global surveillance grid to be implemented by no later than 2030, all under the auspices of “saving the planet.”


Of course, the BIS is also resolute in declaring the World Bank’s “important role” in fighting the phantom foe of climate change – not only in implementing the Technocratic ID4D program, but assembling the cast of private financiers to accompany the torrent of supranational capital:

From the BIS paper,

Some of these “larger private sources of capital” have also positioned themselves in advance of COP21, one example being the marriage of Eastern and Western financial juggernauts in the solar energy market. This was witnessed recently in the merger between China’s solar giant Shunfeng with American-based Suniva – owned in part by the Warburgs (Warburg-Pincus) and Goldman Sachs. These private banking elites and families of antiquity, investing in the petrol-free, carbon-capped future described as a “historic opportunity” by the International Monetary Fund, will doubtlessly be underwriting much of the “green infrastructure” loans called for by COP21.


But it’s not just Chinese solar tycoons assembling the capital and infrastructure for humanity’s (Soylent) green future; the recently birthed multilateral giants of the East, the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) and BRICS NDB (New Development Bank), are also all aboard the sustainable train to globalized Nirvana. In accordance with the United Nations’ assertion that the BRICS NDB is a “dream coming true” for the financing of UN-mandated sustainable development projects in developing economies, the BRICS saw fit to reinforce this notion at the first official meeting of the BRICS Environment Ministers earlier this year.

Don’t take my word for it, or the UN’s, for that matter – the BRICS are crystal clear in their position on Agenda 21:

We  reaffirm our commitment to implement the Rio Declaration, Agenda 21, the Johannesburg Plan of Implementation (JPOI), and the outcomes of the Rio+20 Conference in our respective countries, and through our cooperation within the framework of BRICS in accordance with the Rio principles, including the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities.

We acknowledge the progress made on the Millennium Development Goals in the preceding two decades and reaffirm our commitment towards accelerated implementation of the unfinished task. In this context, we look forward to the adoption of ambitious, transformative and equitable Post-2015 development agenda with Sustainable Development Goals at its core.”

BRICS Statement from the First Official Meeting of BRICS Environment Ministers in Moscow, April 22nd, 2015

These disconcerting official remarks by the BRICS on Agenda 21 stand in stark contrast with recent prognostications by Vladimir Putin to the contrary; this seeming conflict between actual policy and mere rhetoric, designed to seed cognitive dissonance within the minds of the public, is a clear example of a unique brand of propaganda developed in Russia by one Vladislav Surkov.

The alternative media, not immune to the effects of this “non-linear media warfare,” spread the story of Putin’s seeming “climate skepticism” to the Ends of the Earth without so much as a whisper about the Kremlin’s documented support of Agenda 21 as exemplified by the BRICS Summit in Moscow this April.

Put simply, the BRICS cannot simultaneously be against Agenda 21 and adherents to it.

Read full article

Blogging under the pseudonym of Rusticus, the author and freedom activist operates a website tracing the machinations of the Anglo-American Establishment throughout history while simultaneously documenting the process of creating a truly off-grid homestead. (


NWO Universal Binding Agreement To Be Concocted At Paris Summit (VIDEO)


“The UNFCCC which entered into force on 21 March 1994, now has a near-universal membership of 195 parties … In 2015 COP21, also known as the 2015 Paris Climate Conference, will, for the first time in over 20 years of UN negotiations, aim to achieve a legally binding and universal agreement on climate, with the aim of keeping global warming below 2°C.

“The conference is crucial because the expected outcome is a new international agreement on climate change, applicable to all…”

These are the staggering goals paraded on the 21st Conference of the Parties (COP21, the Paris Summit on Climate Change) website that will be taking place this November 30th- December 11th. Their aim is to have all 190 parties in attendance agree on some sort of universal Agenda 21 style resolution to stop global warming, which we all know is a lie. They plan on adopting it in 2015 and having it fully implemented by 2020.

Here is the breaking report….

For More Information See:

Lisa Haven is an independent Christian news analysis and one of the top contributors on She is also author of and runs her own youtube channel (Lisa Haven) with tens-of-thousands of views per day. Digging deep and finding truth is what she lives for. Her passion is to spread truth no matter where it lies. She covers everything from martial law, to FEMA camps, to end time bible prophecy, to government documents and much more! Before launching her journalism career, she wrote many bible studies and lead women ministries for a number of years. She will also complete her ministry degree at International School of Ministry this year.

America, Is It A Foreign Enemy Attacking You? (VIDEO)


“If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.” – James Madison

I often find myself bewildered at the people in this country as to how blatantly blind and deaf they are to the issues that are directly in front of their faces (Matthew 13:14-15).

In this country, people are led to believe, through the lying state controlled narrative, that the only people that are under attack by some dictator only takes place in a third world nation. So, without further ado, let me lay some questions for you to ponder and to consider.

Since September 11, 2001, who has been creating un-constitutional bureaucracies to further control and oppress the American people?   Has it been a third world foreign dictator? Was the un-constitutional Patriot Act enacted by a foreign government? The Patriot Act was not read by one representative and was pushed through at 3:45 am!

Or what of the un-constitutional Department of Homeland Security, which is premised on a pretended authority, stacking oversight and control over to those who are known Muslim Brotherhood operatives (Fox in the chicken coop)?  Is this done by a foreign dictator?

The Transportation Security Administration is another pretended authority and created office to violate Americans while traveling to and fro. Remember, this does not apply to illegal immigrants. They are there to harass Americans, a clear violation of the 4th amendment of the Bill of Rights. Is it a foreign third world dictator that is labeling American Christians and patriots as the enemies of the state?

Is it a foreign third world dictator that is covering up for terrorists?

Is it a foreign third world dictator that is being sued by governors on the southern borders who were magnifying the laws of our constitutional republic against illegal immigrants?

Is it a foreign government attempting to divide and conquer the America people in hopes of domestic insurrection?

Or was it a foreign third world dictator that released 179,027 illegal felonies onto the streets, endangering the lives of American’s last week? Is it a foreign third world dictator that seeks to strip Americans from the RIGHT to bear arms?

Is it a foreign third world dictator trying to demoralize America through the redefinition of God’s design for marriage? (Ephesians 5:31)

Is it a foreign third world dictator attempting to force Americans to pay for the socialist blueprint and un-constitutional “Obamacare”? (Article 1, Section 8 of the United States Constitution)

Is it a foreign third world dictator that sends out spoilers to destroy groups that oppose his dangerous ideologies through the Internal Revenue Services?

Is it a foreign third world dictator that is promoting and identifying America as a democracy to destroy America’s constitutional republic? (Article 4, Section 4 of the United States Constitution)

Is it a foreign third world dictator that is illegally (Article 10 of The Bill of Rights) indoctrinating America’s youth through International Baccalaureate (Global education schemes), No Child Left Behind or Common Core?

Is it a foreign third world dictator that sanctioned the murder of 3 to 4,000 innocent babies in the womb per day (Proverbs 6:17), totaling 55-60 million murdered babies, which is equivalent to 18 states?

Is it a foreign third world dictator that is attacking America’s Christian heritage and the American Constitution?

Is it a foreign third world dictator that is defending, supporting and promoting America’s sworn enemies?

Is it a foreign third world dictator that is lying to the American people on a daily basis?

Is it a foreign third world dictator that has transgressed the Constitution and behaved badly over 1,063 times in the last 6 years?

Finally, is it the American people who have tolerated those who have committed the crimes of a foreign third world dictator in their own country? Why, yes, it is!

“When God wants to judge a nation, He gives them wicked rulers. –John Calvin, Leviticus 26:14-46, Deuteronomy 28:14-68

And while the American people stand back and complain of a criminal administration violating the constitutional covenant, they fail to remember that they are guilty of violating God’s (Deuteronomy 7:10; Hosea 4).

Bradlee Dean is a syndicated columnist for WorldNet Daily, nationally syndicated talk-show host of the Sons of Liberty Radio, ordained preacher, and musician. Combined with his constitutional forefather style of writing, what makes him unique from every other columnist is that he includes a video for every commentary he posts, blending the new age of video with the traditional written commentary. Bradlee Dean is also known for his bold stand of truth in the public square reflected in his recent lawsuit against Rachel Maddow and MSNBC. He speaks on college and high school campuses with his ministry, You Can Run But You Cannot Hide International. Who is Bradlee Dean? Twitter @BradleeDean1 – Facebook :

Methods For Fighting Back Against Collectivist Tyranny


In any examination of historical precedence, it is easy to see that the sheer number of collectivist and tyrannical systems have far outweighed any experiments in individual liberty. I have explored the reasons for this in numerous articles, including recent pieces such as “How To Stamp Out Cultural Marxism In A Single Generation” and “The Tools Collectivists Use To Gain Power.” To summarize, there is a driving desire among weaker-minded people to seek control over other people in the name of arbitrary standards of safety as well as arbitrary standards of “civil” conformity. While such people proclaim publicly that they do what they do for the “greater good,” in reality they seek only to satiate a private lust for power.

In the darkest corners of their souls, many people have personal aspirations to attain godhood in their own little worlds. And if they cannot achieve such godhood outright on their own, then they will join a mob with similar aspirations so that they can at least feel omnipotent through vicarious tyranny.

This is why collectivism and individualism are mutually exclusive. A collectivist uses force or manipulation to compel the masses to accept a society that follows his personal ideology. An individualist adheres only to the tenets of natural law and the non-aggression principle. He believes force is justified only when the personal liberties of an individual are threatened by others. And he demands that if he participates in any society, it be voluntary. Collectivism is society through coercion. Individualism promotes society through voluntary cooperation. The two philosophies cannot coexist.

I’ll say it again because there are some people out there with severe reading comprehension issues; the definition of collectivism requires the prioritization of the group over the rights of the individual.  Collectivism by its very nature denies or destroys individualism and individual choice in this prioritization.  Collectivism therefore requires the engineered organization of individuals predicated by COERCION, or force.  Period.  If a group organizes voluntarily, then it is NOT collectivist.  If a group is organized through force and manipulation, then it IS collectivist. Period.  Bananas are yellow.  Oranges are orange.  The sky is blue.  Two plus two equals four.  And, collectivism compels participation by force, while voluntary community does not.

There is no rational debate to be made against this clear dichotomy.  It is truly amazing how some folks cannot seem to grasp the very obvious difference between collectivism and voluntary community; the same people that will likely still attempt to argue that collectivism and individualism are “not mutually exclusive” after reading this very article.

I certainly would never make the claim that most collectivists are intelligent…

The collectivist threat is not merely due to environmental factors alone. As the psychologist Carl Jung outlined in his collected papers titled “The Undiscovered Self,” at any given point in history at least 10% of the human population has inherent (but often latent) psychopathic tendencies. Less than 1% of these people will actually act out their full psychopathy under stable social conditions. However, in times of great distress or political and economic upheaval, the psychopathic 10% are given a kind of playground in which to let the devil out; Jung called this the “collective shadow.”

As I have explained in the past, these are the “useful idiots” within any society. They are the reason why there will never be a time now or in the future in which collectivist oppression will not be a potential threat, and why individualists will have to remain forever on guard. That said, they are only a part of the bigger problem. In almost every instance of mass tragedy or despotic government, an elitist minority pulls the strings of the useful idiots, aiming them like a shotgun at individualists in order to clear a path for total centralization. The elites are another horror altogether.

These are the men and women who EMBRACE their psychopathy. It is not latent or subconscious; it is a fully integrated and accepted part of their psychological life. They have found that psychopathy can be an effective tool for gaining power and influence when average people around them are less vigilant or less confrontational due to fear or apathy. And contrary to popular belief, psychopaths CONSTANTLY organize into effective working groups, some of them vast and global in scope, as long as there is the promise of mutual benefit involved.

This is not to say that they organize around “gain” alone. Elitists have their own pervasive ideology and their own rationalizations for seeking control of others.

They see themselves as “philosopher kings” as described in Plato’s ‘Republic,’ exemplary and “special” people who are born with the inherent genetic capacity to rule over the masses with the utmost clarity. They believe they know what is best not only for you, but for the human experiment in total. Their goal is to construct a sociopolitical apparatus that will allow them to have complete overreaching influence over every aspect of every individual life, up to and including the erasure of that life if they think it serves their ends.

“…You would be forcibly fed, clothed, lodged, taught, and employed whether you like it or not. If it were discovered that you had not character and industry enough to be worth all this trouble, you might possibly be executed in a kindly manner…” — George Bernard Shaw, Fabian socialist, from ‘The Intelligent Woman’s Guide to Socialism and Capitalism’

“My conclusion is that a scientific society can be stable given certain conditions. The first of these is a single government of the whole world, possessing a monopoly of armed force and therefore able to enforce peace. The second condition is a general diffusion of prosperity, so that there is no occasion for envy of one part of the world by another. The third condition (which supposes the second fulfilled) is a low birth rate everywhere, so that the population of the world becomes stationary, or nearly so. The fourth condition is the provision for individual initiative both in work and in play, and the greatest diffusion of power compatible with maintaining the necessary political and economic framework.” Bertrand Russell, member of the Fabian Society, from ‘The Impact Of Science On Society'(Note: Russell believed that individuals should be given at least the illusion of choice within minor aspects of society in order to maintain their willing participation.)

“The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. … [I]t remains a fact that in almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons… It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind, who harness old social forces and contrive new ways to bind and guide the world.” — Edward Bernays, father of modern propaganda, from ‘Propaganda’

Elitists are rarely as open about their true intentions as the men quoted above. They often entice the public with fantastical promises if collectivist systems are supported, including: equality of wealth and prosperity; reduction of labor and increases in leisure time; incredible technological advances; universal education; universal healthcare; the end of nationalism, resulting in the end of war, resulting in infinite global peace; etc.

When they are not able to sell the public on a particular aspect of collectivism, they will create artificial divisions and artificial crises in order to engineer chaos. As per the Hegelian dialectic, when we are thoroughly tenderized by fear and disaster, the elites return to the scene with a “solution” to their original crime, a solution that usually involves more collectivism.

So how do individualists fight back against collectivism, elitists and the useful idiots they exploit? Here are some practical strategies that anyone can employ in his daily life.

Stop Participating In False Paradigms

Yes, in the everyday world there are leftists and right wingers, liberals and conservatives, Republicans and Democrats. People subscribe to particular ideologies and philosophies backed by fundamental differences in belief. These divisions between regular people are indeed real. However, it is important to realize that at the gatekeeper level in these systems, the leadership in both parties subscribe to the same goals. They are not divided. They are part of the elitist structure. And while their rhetoric differs cosmetically, in policy and in action they will always work to destroy individual liberty and promote collectivism, whether they claim to be on the right or the left.

This reality also applies to supposed conflicts between nations. If two nations appear to be at odds with each other, yet the leadership of each nation remains in league with the same international elitists (bankers, Fabians, globalists, etc.), then their conflict is a sham designed as theater for the masses.

Refuse to participate in false paradigms. Point out the inconsistencies of BOTH parties or sides and identify how each works against individualism and toward collectivism. Do not affiliate with any group or institution that has a demonstrated history of antagonism towards individual freedom or that partners with known collectivist (globalist) organizations and frontmen. If you are going to fight for any side, make sure it truly represents liberty through its actions and associations.  Rhetoric is meaningless.

Decouple From Dependency On Corrupt Systems

As our economic situation becomes more and more dire, people are much more apt to become dependent on the system for survival, and this is an intentional result. I would not expect, for example, that the 94 million people in the U.S. who have been unemployed for so long they are no longer counted by the Bureau of Labor Statistics should refrain from government aid or cut themselves off from welfare measures and become immediately self-reliant. They should, however, consider working toward that goal over time; and so should everyone else.

This is not quite as impossible as it seems. Can you produce or repair items that act as survival necessities? Can you teach a necessary skill? If so, then you are already well on your way to independence. Once you have a necessary skill, trade is possible outside the controlled economic framework. The more individuals involved in an alternative economy, the more diversity of skill sets will be available and the more prosperous that voluntary community will become.

The ultimate achievement in my view would be similar in aspects to the American agrarian models of the past with the integration of helpful technology: completely voluntary communities in which free trade is the foundation; the existence of grid water and grid power is unnecessary; food production is local and ample rather than reliant on national or international freight systems and the artificial scarcity of corporate farming models; and security is provided by each individual for himself, as well as for the community, through voluntary neighborhood watches or militias.

All of this starts with each individual taking action to become a producer, rather than a wage slave or welfare slave.

Organize Locally With People Of Like Mind

Again, organizing voluntarily is counter to collectivism.  Collectivist systems cannot be defeated unless you are willing to establish a competing model that works better while maintaining freedom. This is not hard to do, considering collectivist models are failure-driven machines that devour people and use them as fuel to move society as a whole towards a “greater good” which is neither great nor good.

As outlined above, independent localism is the answer. It is a voluntary structure that encourages self-reliance and preparedness, while making production and innovation the mainstays of a healthy society. It rewards personal success and achievement, rather than punishing it. And, it helps a larger percentage of wealth to keep cycling locally, rather than being siphoned out of communities by governments or government-chartered and protected corporations.

Localism always starts small, with families, friends and neighbors. But as your organization continues to make life better for those involved, it will inevitably attract more participants.  The redundancy of localized economies would also protect people from economic collapse.  In fact, without the forced interdependency of centralized collectivist economic models, large scale financial crises would probably become a thing of the past.

Educate Children Privately

I’ve been saying it a lot lately, and I’ll say it again: Public schooling as it stands today is an apparatus for brainwashing, nothing more. With the dismal world ranking of U.S. students in math, science and reading, I hardly see what service public education is actually performing in America. The only service public schools do seem to excel at is indoctrination, with children now being immersed in collectivist lessons through Common Core and being conditioned into pacifism and fear through insane zero-tolerance policies.

The only working solutions available for parents today are to decouple from the federally dominated public school system and place their children in a well-vetted private school or to home-school. Any sacrifice, financial or otherwise, is worth it to save American children from a vicious system of propaganda and conditioning that could conceivably suppress their individualism and warp them into collectivist monsters.

Arm And Train For Self-Defense

I think it should be pretty obvious that there is a simple reason behind the collectivist habit of attempting to disarm common people: Armed people are harder to manage or control.  If an armed population was not a threat to collectivists then they would not keep trying to disarm everyone. Therefore, if you are not armed and trained in self-defense, then you are not a threat to collectivists.

You can be the most brilliant of thinkers with pristine logic and truth on your side; but without the means and ability to destroy an attacker or tyrant, you are nothing in the grand scheme. Intellectual warriors are not really warriors. And as a writer, I will say in all honesty that the threat of the pen is not mightier than the threat of the sword.

Keep in mind, though, that it is not enough to merely purchase a firearm or shoot at the range. Team tactics and training are essential for free people, which is why they are so admonished by collectivist elements in our society. Train with friends and family or with your Community Preparedness Team, as I do through Oath Keepers; but learn tactical methodologies and how to fight with others. Present a viable danger to collectivists, or be subsumed by them.

Remove The Elitist Hierarchy

Eventually, the fight between individualism and collectivism will become physical rather than informational. There is no way around it. The more individuals begin to decouple from the corrupt system and construct their own alternative framework, the more violent collectivists will turn in response. The virtue of self-defense requires that tyrants be cut off from their means to project violence onto others.

While it is impossible to stop the inherent nature of psychopathy other than to participate in communities where psychopaths are not welcome or encouraged, there is the matter of organized elitism to deal with.

Any fight for freedom from collectivists will require the removal of command and control. This is the only way that humanity can be given breathing room to rebuild without remaining under constant preplanned threat. There are, in fact, many organizations that openly work toward collectivist oligarchy, from central banks (this means central bankers in ALL nations, not just in the West), to the Council On Foreign Relations, to Tavistock, to the Rand Corporation, to the International Monetary Fund or the Bank for International Settlements, to Bilderberg, to the Fabian Society, etc. These institutions need to be dismantled by any means necessary and the participants removed from positions of control. Make no mistake; it will take a war before such people give up the reins of power. This is the inevitable cost of individualism and the inevitable cost of freedom.

If you would like to support the publishing of articles like the one you have just read, visit our donations page here.  We greatly appreciate your patronage.

Brandon Smith is the founder of the Alternative Market Project, an organization designed to help you find like-minded activists and preppers in your local area so that you can network and construct communities for barter and mutual aid. Join today and learn what it means to step away from the unstable mainstream system and build something better. You can contact Brandon Smith at: [email protected].

Leaked Documents Prove U.S. Government Is Targeting Patriots As Terrorists (VIDEO)

u.s. government targeting patriots

Are you against big government, high taxes, or just want to be left alone? Do you carry a Bible or are you self reliant? Do you store food, water, or supplies? Do you want to live off the grid without worry of the government telling you what to do? Do you believe in the Constitution and that America was great because of it? Then, my friends, you can rest assured you are on the governments watch list and now I have 100% documented proof to prove it.

In fact things are heating up for patriots, gun owners, veterans, and Christians. Ever since last years decision by the Ninth Circuit in the Dariano v. Morgan Hill Unified School District case, in which they ruled that a public school can ban the American flag all while displaying flags of other countries—things have really begun to hit the fan!

In most recent reports colleges have done everything from defaming the Constitution to all out shredding it, while other school districts have banned the American flag, while yet others are calling for any “patriotic paraphernalia” to be removed.

To make matters worse our government has published four documents that specifically targets patriots, and I do believe it’s only a matter of time before they come after patriots, such as myself, and any who stand in stark opposition against the things they are attempting to achieve—like global governance.

The America we live in today, is not the America we once knew. In the video below I delve through factually evidence that proves once an for all their targeted attack of patriot, gun owners, veterans, and Christians. Please, please don’t miss this critical report and share it with everyone you know.

According to a Military Training Manual our Founders were “extremists” and those who are like them should also be targeted:

“An ideology is a set of political beliefs about the nature of people and society. People who are committed to an ideology seek not only to persuade but to recruit others to their belief. In U.S. history, there are many examples of extremist ideologies and movements. The colonists who sought to free themselves from British rule and the Confederate states who sought to secede from the Northern states are just two examples.” (pg. 43)


“Extremists often predict dire or catastrophic consequences from a situation or from a failure to follow a specific course, and they tend to exhibit a kind of crisis mindedness. It can be a Communist takeover, a Nazi revival, nuclear war, earthquakes, floods, or the wrath of God. Whatever it is, it is just around the corner unless we follow their program and listen to their special insight and wisdom, to which only the truly enlightened have access. For extremists, any setback or defeat is the beginning of the end.” (pg.41)

Furthermore the Start report titled, Hot Spots of Terrorism and Other Crimes in the US, defines Right-Wing Extremists as:

“Extreme Right-Wing: groups that believe that one’s personal and/or national “way of life” is under attack and is either already lost or that the threat is imminent (for some the threat is from a specific ethnic, racial, or religious group), and believe in the need to be prepared for an attack either by participating in paramilitary preparations and training or survivalism. Groups may also be fiercely nationalistic (as opposed to universal and international in orientation), anti-global, suspicious of centralized federal authority, reverent of individual liberty, and believe in conspiracy theories that involve grave threat to national sovereignty and/or personal liberty.” (pg.13)

Therefore any and all people who believe in liberty can be deemed an extremist!! Be ready because it’s right around the corner…. 

fear of government

For More Information See:

What Terrorism Is (pdf)-

Documents (pdf)-

Start Document (Pdf)-

Extremists Doc-

Fox Poll-

Constitution Shredding-


Housing Community Bans Flag-


Hawaii Constitution Ban-

Missouri School Bans Constitution-

California Bans Constitution-

Moretown Elementary-


Modesto College Bans Constitution-

Right Wing Bumper Sticker (pg. 90-92)-

Lisa Haven is an independent Christian news analysis and one of the top contributors on She is also author of and runs her own youtube channel (Lisa Haven) with tens-of-thousands of views per day. Digging deep and finding truth is what she lives for. Her passion is to spread truth no matter where it lies. She covers everything from martial law, to FEMA camps, to end time bible prophecy, to government documents and much more! Before launching her journalism career, she wrote many bible studies and lead women ministries for a number of years. She will also complete her ministry degree at International School of Ministry this year.

COP 21: UN Plan To Make Legally Binding Climate Change Laws – Worldwide

COP 21 (the 2015 Paris Climate Change Conference) aims to make legally binding climate change laws worldwide – a giant step towards One World Government.

COP 21 (the 2015 Paris Climate Change Conference) aims to make legally binding climate change laws worldwide – a giant step towards One World Government.

COP 21 or the 2015 Paris Climate Conference that is scheduled to take place in Paris on November 30, 2015, will be unlike other UN climate summits or climate conferences in the past. COP 21 has a scarily grandiose objective: in their own wordsto achieve a legally binding and universal agreement on climate … for the first time in over 20 years of UN negotiations.” If they achieve their aim, we would be faced with the horrifying prospect that the mythology of AGW (anthropogenic global warming or manmade global warming) would become entrenched in law, thus solidifying it as fact in the minds of many. It would be a giant step towards Global Governance or a One World Government with a worldwide carbon tax, for so long now the wet dream of the New World Order manipulators.

COP 21: Trying to Make the AGW Fallacy Into Law

The objective sought at COP 21 has been a long time coming. Obama revealed how important this was to some factions of the NWO when he stated that his “definition of leadership would be leading on climate change, an international accord that potentially we’ll get in Paris“, in response to the assertion put forth by the interviewer that Putin was challenging Obama’s leadership. If worldwide climate change laws are just as important to the NWO as controlling Syria, it gives you some idea of what is at stake here. Some have also suggested that the upcoming COP 21 was the reason former Aussie PM Tony Abbott lost leadership of his party (Abbot was strongly opposed to the idea of AGW) and replaced with pro-AGW and Goldman Sachs man, Malcolm Turnbull.

Normally, the annual COP (Conference of Parties) meets to review the implementation of the “Rio Convention”, drawn up at the Rio Earth Summit in 1992. It includes the UNFCCC (UN Framework on Climate Change) which entered into force in 1994 and has 195 signatory parties. This time, COP 21 will be going all out with extra gusto to create a new set of planetary laws to ensure every nation must combat climate change, with the purported aim “of keeping global warming below 2°C“.

A Few Problems for COP 21: Antarctica, Greenland and the Arctic Aren’t Cooperating

Embarrassingly for the AGW promoters, as we head into COP 21, recent studies suggest possible global cooling, and certainly not global warming.

Embarrassingly for the AGW promoters, as we head into COP 21, recent studies suggest possible global cooling, and certainly not global warming.

Unfortunately for the global governance enthusiasts, who seek universal “consensus” among all nations and parts of the Earth, there are many factions that are not cooperating – include a couple of massive areas of ice, and a continent. Very recent data reports from multiple sources (NASA and AGU/BAS [American Geophysical Union and British Antarctic Survey]) are suggesting that not only is Antarctica not succumbing to global warming, but just the reverse – it is freezing over. Here are some quotes from the studies; this first one is from the NASA study:

“A new NASA study says that an increase in Antarctic snow accumulation that began 10,000 years ago is currently adding enough ice to the continent to outweigh the increased losses from its thinning glaciers … According to the new analysis of satellite data, the Antarctic ice sheet showed a net gain of 112 billion tons of ice a year from 1992 to 2001. That net gain slowed to 82 billion tons of ice per year between 2003 and 2008.”

The net gain may have slowed, but that is still a gigantic amount of ice to gain. This next one is from the joint AGU/BAS study:

Since the record is 300 years long, we can see that the amount of snow that has been accumulating in this region since the 1990s is the highest we have seen in the last 300 years … Annual snow accumulation increased in the early 20th century, rising 30 percent between 1900 and 2010.”

COP 21: Capitalizing on fear mongering like has always been done?

COP 21: Capitalizing on fear mongering like has always been done?

Meanwhile, around the North Pole, the same thing seems to be happening. Tony Heller of Steven Goddard reports that “Ice growth in Greenland continues at record levels this fall. The surface of Greenland has gained 200 billion tons of snow and ice in the last eight weeks. This has been accompanied by record cold weather approaching -60C” and also that “Arctic sea ice extent is at a ten year high for the date, after record growth“.

Maybe the NWO controllers should have made anthropogenic global cooling their crusade, and fooled people into some other kind of tax based on plummeting temperatures … oh, wait a minute, they did (see image above)! I guess it’s too late to reverse course now … although with the vague term climate change anything is possible.

Leading French Meteorologist Verdier Busts AGW in His Book, Loses Job

In what is very interesting timing for France, one of their leading meteorologists, Philippe Verdier, recently published a book Climat Investigation (Climate Investigation), where he accuses climate change scientists and the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) of manipulating the data. As Verdier states in this video, “My book ‘Climate Investigation’ was published one month ago. It got me banned from the air waves,” and according to RT also said that he had put himself “in the path of COP 21, which is a bulldozer, and this is the result.”

Consensus? Far From It: Look at All the Dissenters in the Run Up to COP 21

Dissent is also a high form of thinking for yourself, being an individual and not going along with the uninformed masses.

Dissent is also a high form of thinking for yourself, being an individual and not going along with the uninformed masses.

The more you look, the more you find dissenters from all over the Earth who are speaking out against the highly politicized AGW climate change movement as COP 21 approaches. Unfortunately for the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, the UN, the IPCC and all their stooges and mouthpieces, the UN has failed to achieve consensus (one of its favorite buzzwords) on climate change, and the science is settled only in one way – showing that the world is not really warming at all, and that man’s contribution to climate change is insignificant. There are a plethora of dissenting individuals, scientists and organizations with massive research behind them showing that AGW is a political movement to usher in global governance:

NIPCC: The Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change is an international panel of nongovernment scientists and scholars who have come together to understand the causes and consequences of climate change. They published the 2009 report Climate Change Reconsidered which they claim “is the most comprehensive critique of the IPCC’s positions ever published. It lists 35 contributors and reviewers from 14 countries and presents in an appendix the names of 31,478 American scientists who have signed a petition saying ‘there is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate’.”;

1000+ dissenting scientists: as of 2010, there were more than 1000 international scientists (up from 700) who came out and publicly went on the record to state that AGW is a flawed model. The list includes many current and former UN IPCC scientists, who have now turned against the UN IPCC;

– This list of scientists who oppose the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming;

John Casey: this former White House space program advisor believes in global cooling, and that the Earth is on the brink of a major ice age;

Christopher Monckton: this former advisor to the UK Prime Minister has done a great job exposing the fear mongering and junk science behind the global warming movement, which is really a cover for implementing cap-and-trade (favoring big corporations) and global government. He quotes how Al Gore admitting his own sensationalism: “I believe it’s appropriate to have an over-representation of factual presentations of how dangerous it is”;

Ian Plimer: this Australian geologist humorously calls the AGW movement a “load of hot air” and has shown how the data measurements for climate change have been totally rigged. He also points out how environmentalism has replaced organized religion as a matter of personal faith.;

– Russia: Many have referenced Russian President Putin’s disdain for the idea of AGW, and have reported that he believes that “there is no global warming, that this is a fraud to restrain the industrial development of several countries, including Russia,” and that maybe global warming will mean Russians “spend less on fur coats.”

COP 21: Remember How It All Started …

COP 21: the endgame of the hijacked environmental movement

COP 21: the endgame of the hijacked environmental movement

COP 21 is the culmination of a very long-term plan, hatched by the NWO manipulators decades ago, and revealed in the documents like the Report from Iron Mountain and the Club of Rome. It is also important to note that COP 21 and AGW are the result of a Rothschild-Rockefeller attempt to create a One World Government. George Hunt was the whistleblower who was there at the start. He overheard and captured the actual voices of the Rothschilds, the Rockefellers and their top agents as the laid out their deceitful schemes, some of which you can hear in this video!

As William Jasper pointed out in The New American, the official draft text of the climate treaty to be agreed upon at COP 21 includes provisions for the establishment of an “International Tribunal of Climate Justice” (see pg. 19 of 34) – think World Court – which, alongside a world carbon tax, is yet another stepping stone to the New World Order. Make no mistake about it; there are some serious things planned at COP 21 which will affect every human being on the planet. It remains to be seen whether the people attending the conference will vote humanity further towards a One World Government based on carbon deception.









Makia Freeman is the editor of The Freedom Articles and senior researcher at, writing on many aspects of the global conspiracy, from vaccines to Zionism to false flag operations and more, and also including info on natural health, sovereignty and higher consciousness.

Florida Health Freedom Under Attack: New Bill (SB 646) Threatens Vaccine Exemptions; Forces Gov. Tracking Of Records

 florida health freedom

The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) just released critically important information on Florida bill SB 646, which aggressively undermines health freedom by greatly restricting medical and religious vaccine exemptions, as well as expanding forced government tracking of private citizen’s confidential vaccination records.

Please share this news release with others and act now to send a clear message that we will not support unconstitutional restrictions against our health freedom.

It will only take a few minutes of your time to make a call to express your opposition, and each such effort could make a world of difference! 

Join the Facebook group, formerly “Floridians Opposed to SB 646,” now Floridians for Health Freedom, to organize with other activists. 

Latest Update (11/05/15) : The Bill Has Been WITHDRAWN by Senator Alan Hays!


Effective Date: 7/1/2016
Last Action: 11/6/2015 Senate – Withdrawn prior to introduction
Location: Withdrawn from consideration

NVIC Press Release (Updated: 11/05/15) Dear Florida NVIC Advocacy Team Members,

We are requesting your communication with your state legislators as soon as possible to OPPOSE SB 646 sponsored by Senator Hays (R) District 11.

This terrible bill has just been filed and it significantly restricts medical and religious vaccine exemptions, it expands and forces participation in a vaccine tracking system, and it requires public posting of vaccination exemption rates for individual schools.  It is a major attack on families who don’t agree with all doses of all required vaccines. SB 646 needs to be strongly opposed.

The Florida legislature is in attendance in a special session on redistricting until this Friday November 6th so there is a small window of opportunity where legislators are in their offices for you to show strong opposition to this bill to prevent the bill from getting co-sponsors and eventual committee hearings once session starts on January 12th.  This bill needs to be killed and we need to come out strong with everyone in Florida contacting their legislators IMMEDIATELY to tell them to oppose SB 646 and do NOT become a co-sponsor.


1)  CALL, EMAIL, and FAX your Florida State Senator and Representative and ask them to OPPOSE SB 646.  Tell them DO NOT become a co-sponsor (see talking points below)If you do not know who your Florida State Senator and Representative are or their contact information, you can login to the NVIC Advocacy Portal, click on the “State Teams” tab and then “My State,” and your elected officials are automatically posted on the right hand side of the page You can also use this search engines below tofind your Florida legislators.

2)  Contact Governor Rick Scott and ask him to OPPOSE SB 646. Tell him you need his support to maintaining religious belief and medical exemptions to mandatory vaccinations as they are and to oppose any effort, like SB 646 to restrict these exemptions. Governor Scottcall (850) 717-9337.

3)  Contact Senator Alan Hays, primary author of SB 646 by email, phone, fax, or Facebook at ask him to withdraw SB 646!  You can refer to the talking points below.

4)  Login to the NVIC Advocacy Portal often to check for updates. Bills can change many times over the legislative process. Please forward this email to family and friends and ask them to register for the NVIC Advocacy Portal and share their concerns with their legislators as well.

Talking Points:

[Include your return address so they can see you are in their district, and start by introducing yourself and identifying yourself as a constituent] 

I urge you to OPPOSE SB 646 which significantly restricts religious belief and medical exemptions to vaccine requirements and expands forced government tracking of private citizens’ confidential medical vaccination records.  It is very important to my family that you do NOT co-sponsor this bill.

[Explain PERSONALLY why it is important to your family to be able to delay or decline vaccination using the religious belief or medical exemption.  Incorporate any stories of vaccine reactions, harassment, or vaccine failure to personalize your communication.]

SB 646,, should be opposed because it:

Adds new forced vaccine tracking requirements for all children including those with vaccine exemptions:

Page 2, lines 48-53: Before the 2017-2018 school year, each child must have a vaccine record on file of their vaccination status for all required vaccines with the State Health Online Tracking System, or Florida SHOTS. The Department of Health has free reign in their rules how to implement this should it pass. 

Page 3, lines 65-66: SB 646 requires the Religious Exemption to be recorded in the vaccine tracking system SHOTS by Department of Health personnel.

Nobody should be forced to have their private confidential medical vaccination records or exemptions tracked by their government.  This should be an OPT-IN system for those families wanting this service.  Families who are capable of keeping track of their own children’s records with their doctor or who claim a vaccine exemption should NOT be forced to be in a centralized government surveillance and enforcement database.

Forces new restrictions on the religious exemption:

Page 2, line 58 – Page 3 line 66: Before receiving a religious exemption, SB 646 adds the additional requirement that the parent or guardian must review a video provided by the Department of Health on vaccines and diseases. The video will be made by the Department of Health in collaboration with the Florida Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Neither of these organizations are religious organizations nor do they adequately acknowledge legitimate vaccine risks and contraindications. Their forced insertion into personal religious decisions would be an inappropriate action of the Florida legislature. This is not about vaccine education, it is about harassment, discrimination and hurdles placed in front of someone with different religious beliefs not agreeable to those who push forced vaccination. The AAP has a policy statement against religious and other non-medical exemptions, and pediatricians profit from giving vaccines so this creates a complete conflict of interest.

Page 5, lines120-123. Religious exemptions are further restricted by creating the new requirement that they expire after only two years.

This is harassment and unnecessary.  People don’t change their religious beliefs every two years and vaccines are always available to those who want them.

Restricts the medical exemption:

Page 3, lines 69-80:  Restricts the permanent medical exemption to: “A child who has been diagnosed with T cell or combined T and B cell immunodeficiency, has been diagnosed with any other immunodeficiency for which live virus vaccines are contraindicated, or is undergoing a solid organ or bone marrow transplant and should be permanently exempt from the required immunization” or a reason determined by The Department of Health.

Current law allows a physician to write a permanent medical exemption. Instead of allowing a physician to decide what is best for his/her patient, the bill author is attempting to limit medical exemptions to this narrow window along with arbitrary determinations by the Department of Health. There are many valid reasons why an individual patient is medically contraindicated to receive one or more vaccines that will fall outside of these limited reasons.  The legislature should not stand between the patient and their personal doctor to decide what is best for the patient – one size does NOT fit all.

Page 2, line 87 – Page 3, line 92:Before receiving any medical exemption, SB 646 adds the additional requirement that the parent or guardian must review a video while in the physician’s office provided by the Department of Health on vaccines and diseases.

If a doctor and their patient have determined a person should be medically exempt from vaccination, having to watch a video made with the input of a trade association whose members profit from and support forced vaccination is nothing but harassment and discrimination.

Page 5, lines120-123: All medical exemptions are further restricted by creating the new requirement that they expire after only two years.

This is bureaucratic harassment wasting parents’ time and money.  The doctor and the child’s parents should be the only ones deciding how long the medical exemption applies, not the legislature.

Requires the exemption rates of all individual schools to be disclosed online

Page 5, lines 124-130: Requires the Health Department and all public and private schools to post the school’s vaccine exemption rates on their websites.

This is not about health.  It is a documented political strategy to instigate a HOSTILE community environment against those using vaccine exemptions.  SB 656 provides useless information in schools because overall vaccine exemption numbers don’t tell what type of vaccine the exemption is for. An exemption form is used whether it is for one dose of one shot or all doses.  This bill perpetuates the myth that high vaccination rates guarantee immunity. Vaccines fail and wane, and people vaccinated with live viral vaccines shed the virus and can spread disease.  This bill gives parents of immune compromised kids the false sense of security that a school with high vaccination rates and low exemption rates is a safe environment for their kids.  This is not only FALSE, it is dangerous.


Dawn Richardson, Director of Advocacy
National Vaccine Information Center and

The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) works diligently to prepare and disseminate our legislative advocacy action alerts and supporting materials.  We request that organizations and members of the public forward our alerts in their original form to assure consistent and accurate messaging and effective action. Please acknowledge NVIC as originators of this work when forwarding to members of the public and like-minded organizations. To receive alerts immediately, register  at, a website dedicated to this sole purpose and provided as a free public service by NVIC. 


Article Contributed by Sayer Ji, Founder of

Sayer Ji is an author, researcher, lecturer, and advisory board member of the National Health Federation. He founded in 2008 in order to provide the world an open access, evidence-based resource supporting natural and integrative modalities. It is internationally recognized as the largest and most widely referenced health resource of its kind.

World Bank Makes A Chilling Announcement That Will Rattle You To The Very Core! (VIDEO)

world bank

According to the World Bank website, “It is a vital source that offers financial and technical assistance to developing countries around the world. They are not a bank in the common sense. They are made up of two unique development institutions owned by 185 member countries—the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) and the International Development Association (IDA). Each institution plays a different but collaborative role to advance the vision of an inclusive and sustainable globalization.”

In their own words the World Bank aims at globalization and will stop at nothing until their vision of global governance is accomplished and recently they have made a bold move in that direction.

In the video below I reveal the disturbing announcement that the World Bank in conjunction with the United Nations has made to the world about their plans for the very near future of mankind. If you are a Christian, then this will send chills down your spine! Please, please don’t miss this urgent report….

“Providing legal identity for all (including birth registration) by 2030 is a target shared by the international community as part of the Sustainable Development Goals (target 16.9). The World Bank Group (WBG) has launched the Identification for Development (ID4D) cross-practice initiative, with the participation of seven GP/CCSAs[1] sharing the same vision and strategic objectives, to help our client countries achieve this goal and with the vision of making everyone count: ensure a unique legal identity and enable digital ID-based services to all.” World Bank

Digital ID for all—likely Mark of the Beast style. That is the blatant agenda of the World Bank who constantly prides itself as a globalist organization who seeks to globalize the world into the New World Order.   

The global governments now ruling the world have evil, vile tendencies and work hand and hand with the king of darkness himself, Lucifer to usher in the Antichrists rule and promote the Mark of the Beast:

“Here is wisdom. Let him who has understanding calculate the number of the beast, for the number is that of a man; and his number is six hundred and sixty-six.” Revelation 13:18

Today it seems they have made a major steps in that direction. But I must issue a stark warning not to take this “biometric” ID, if it is anything like the Bible describes, because according to the Word of God, it will reign His fury on you:

“If anyone worships the beast and its image and receives its mark on their forehead or on their hand, they, too, will drink the wine of God’s fury, which has been poured full strength into the cup of his wrath. They will be tormented with burning sulfur in the presence of the holy angels and of the Lamb. And the smoke of their torment will rise forever and ever. There will be no rest day or night for those who worship the beast and its image, or for anyone who receives the mark of its name.” Revelation 14:9-11

For More Information See:

Biometrics Global Identity-

World Bank-

World Bank Report (pdf file)-

Sustainable Development (Agenda 2030) –


Lisa Haven is an independent Christian news analysis and one of the top contributors on She is also author of and runs her own youtube channel (Lisa Haven) with tens-of-thousands of views per day. Digging deep and finding truth is what she lives for. Her passion is to spread truth no matter where it lies. She covers everything from martial law, to FEMA camps, to end time bible prophecy, to government documents and much more! Before launching her journalism career, she wrote many bible studies and lead women ministries for a number of years. She will also complete her ministry degree at International School of Ministry this year.

The Tools Collectivists Use To Gain Power


While many divisions within our society are arbitrary or engineered, there is one division that represents perhaps the most pervasive and important conflict of our time; the division between collectivists and individualists.

Now, people who do not understand the nature of collectivism will often argue that individualism and collectivism are not mutually exclusive because individuals require groups in order to survive and thrive. However, a “group” is not necessarily a collective.

For some reason the core fundamental of collectivism – the use of psychological coercion or physical force to compel participation – goes right over the heads of many skeptics. A group does not have to be collectivist. Any group can and should be voluntary. Collectivism is NOT voluntary. Therefore, collectivism and individualism are indeed mutually exclusive. Collectivists and individualists cannot exist in the same space at the same time without eventually coming into conflict. There is simply no way around it.

From the position of the liberty minded (or the average Libertarian), collectivism is by far the inferior of the two philosophies. Collectivists often boast of the social and economic “harmonization” collectivism creates, as well as the mobilization of labor to “streamline progress.” The reality is that artificially rigged harmony is no harmony at all. If people are forced to homogenize and get along through fear, then peace has not truly been accomplished.

Human beings must come to their own conclusions on cooperation and tolerance in their own time. They cannot be manipulated and shoehorned into a “utopian” framework. Problems will result, like genocide, which tends to erupt during almost every attempt at collectivist utopianism.

Economic harmonization is even less practical, with government force inevitably used to confiscate resources from one group to give to another group, essentially punishing success or frugality. This creates an environment in which achievement becomes less desirable. When people do not have individual incentive to pursue achievement, they see personal effort as wasted. Innovation and entrepreneurship fall by the wayside, and society as a whole begins to diminish in prosperity. Without individual accomplishments and ingenuity, the group is nothing but a hollow mindless ant hill.

Another argument which usually arises is that individualism leads to “selfishness” and the dominance of wealth devouring machines like corporations. I would remind collectivists that corporations exist only through the legal framework and protections of corporate personhood created by governments, and without government protections and favor, corporations could not exist. It is by collectivism, not individualism, that corporatocracy thrives.

At the same time, collectivists consistently blame individualist “free markets” for the numerous ailments of nations.  Yet another misrepresentation considering America has not had true free markets in well over a century, and most other nations have never had true free markets in their history.  Feudalism and its child Socialism have always been present to plague mankind.

There are no merits to collectivism that are not accomplished with greater success by individualism and voluntary community. In fact, collectivism only serves to enrich and empower a select few elites while destroying the future potential of all other individuals.

Given the disturbing nature of collectivism, one would think that attempts at collectivist societies would be a rarity, shunned by most people as akin to inviting cancer into the body. Unfortunately, cultures based on individualism are the minority in history.

The average collectivist is not usually much of a beneficiary of collectivism. We call these people “useful idiots” or “sheeple” who unknowingly serve the darker machinations of elitists while under the delusion that they are changing society for the better. The reason useful idiots participate in collectivism are many, but I have found that across the spectrum these people tend to be weak willed, weak minded, and by extension, possess a rabid desire for control over others.

It is perhaps no coincidence that “intellectuals” (self proclaimed) tend to end up at the forefront of modern efforts for collectivism. While the poor and destitute are often exploited by collectivism as a mob to be wielded like a battering ram, it is the soft noodle-bodied and fearful academia that acts as middle management in the collectivist franchise. It is they that desire the power to impose their “superior” ideologies on others, and since they are too weak to accomplish anything on their own, they require the cover and momentum of collectivist movements to give them the totalitarian fix they so crave. In other words, they believe in humanitarianism by totalitarianism.

Individualism is under constant and imminent threat as the collectivist obsession with control grows. The ultimate end game of collectivists is to derive submission from individuals, to corner people into handing over their individualism willingly.  It is not enough for them to merely apply force, the greatest power is in the power of consent.  Here are the most common tools used by collectivists to obtain power and manufacture consent from the masses.

The Illusion Of Consensus

Collectivists rely greatly on the force of a well-aimed mob to convince the general public they have the consensus position; that they are in the majority. Appearing to be in the majority is the single most important goal of a collectivist movement, even if they are in reality a small minority. The anonymity of web activism gives the force of the mob a new potency. No more than a dozen collectivists working in tandem can wreak havoc in multiple web forums or harass numerous individualist publications while giving casual readers the impression that their ideology is “everywhere.”

The key here is that collectivists understand that the average person does not want to be seen as too contrary to the majority. They understand that the majority view matters to the public, even if the majority view is utterly wrong. If collectivists can convince enough people that their ideology is the majority view, they know that many people will blindly adopt that ideology as their own in order to fit in. The lie of consensus then becomes a self perpetuating prophecy. This problem will remain forever a danger as long as people continue to care at all about the majority view.

The Destruction Of Core Institutions

Those institutions people consider “core institutions” are sometimes vital, and sometimes not. That said, it is the openly admitted objective of collectivists through socialist-style movements to destroy core institutions so that there is no competition to their new system. A collectivist society cannot allow citizens to have any loyalties beyond their loyalty to the group or the state.

So, individual liberties must be degraded or removed, as per the constant reinterpretation of the Constitution as a “living document.”  Religious institutions must be painted as shameful affairs for stupid barbaric cave-people. And, the family unit must be broken apart. This is done through economic depravity so pronounced that families never see each other, through state influence over children through public schooling, and through identity politics and propaganda which create sexual and racial conflicts out of thin air.

Dominating Discussion

This coincides with the idea of artificial consensus, but it goes beyond the use of the mob. In our daily lives we are now bombarded with collectivist messages — in mainstream news, in television shows, in movies, through web media and print media. The money behind these outlets belongs to a very small and select group of people, but through them the collectivist worldview is injected into every corner of our society. I would call this propaganda by attrition; an indirect but steady insertion of collectivism creating an atmosphere in which the ideology becomes commonplace even though it is being promoted by a limited number of people.

Exploiting The Youth

When we are young, most of us spend a great deal of time and energy working to be taken seriously. The question is, should we be taken seriously?

In my view and the view of the liberty minded, it really depends on the person’s actions, experience, efforts and accomplishments. Most younger people have little to no experience in life and haven’t had the time to accomplish much. They are still learning how to function in the world, and what kind of goals they want to pursue (if they ever pursue any goals). Because of this, it is hard for those of us who have gone through considerable struggles in life and reached a certain level of achievement to take them seriously when they decide to stroll into a room and pontificate on their moral and philosophical superiority. It makes me want to ask; what the hell have you ever accomplished?

This is not to say that there are not ingenious young people out there, or ignorant and lazy older folks. There are. But collectivist movements seek to exploit younger generations exactly because of their general lack of experience and naivety, as well as their feelings of entitlement when it comes to respect.

Collectivism almost always utilizes a theory called “futurism” in order to appeal to the young. The theory, which was a leading philosophy behind the rise of fascism, proclaims that all new ideas are superior in their social usefulness and all old ideas and beliefs should be abandoned like so much dead skin. According to futurism, those who cling to old ideas and principles are an obstacle to the progress of society as a whole.

The funny thing is, the ideas usually expounded by collectivists are as old as time — elitism, feudalism, totalitarianism, etc. None of these methodologies are “new” by any stretch of the imagination, but collectivists repackage them as if they are some grand new secret to Shangri-La. Younger adherents of collectivism latch onto futurism almost immediately. For, if all new ideas are superior, and all old ideas are barbaric, and younger people are the purveyors and consumers of everything new, then this means that it is the youngest generations that are the wisest, and the village elders that are naïve. By default, the young become the village elders without them ever having to struggle, make sacrifices, learn hard lessons, suffer loss, rise to challenges, or accomplish anything.

The enticing nature of this sudden groundswell of cultural respect is simply far too much for the average person college age or younger to ignore. Collectivism gives the young what they think they want, then uses them as tools for greater conquests.

Forcing Society To Accept The Lowest Common Denominator

Collectivism requires the homogenization of society, to the point that individualism is frowned upon and success is treated as negligible. Whether it is public schools lowering standards to the point that students with little or no reading comprehension graduate, or businesses being forced to lower standards in the name of “diversity” while rejecting employees with superior skill sets because they do not belong to a designated victim group, or government institutions like the military lowering physical standards to accommodate far weaker candidates in the name of “gender parity” while putting every soldier’s life at risk in the process, we are constantly being asked to accommodate the lowest common denominator instead of reaching for the highest level of excellence.

This makes the concept of success a bit of a joke. For “success” within such a system is easy as long as one follows the rules; excelling as an individual is not a factor. And by success I mean being allowed to survive, because that is the best you are going to get in a collectivist structure. The only way to fail is to not follow the rules, rules which may be arbitrary or idiotic at their core. Individualists are immediately punished for thinking or acting outside the box, when this is exactly the kind of behavior that should be encouraged. A society built on the lowest common denominator is a society destined for collapse. Individuals are systematically weeded out in the name of homogenization and all of their potential achievements and innovations disappear with them.

The nightmare of collectivism is the defining battle of our age. It is in this era that we will decide whether or not individual liberty and freedom of thought are more important than the illusory security and “harmony” of the collective.

I, for one, long to see a future in which individual enterprise is allowed to thrive and voluntary participation is the root principle on which our culture functions; a future in which state power is reduced to zero, or near zero, and government force is no longer an acceptable means by which one group can seek to control another group. I may not see this world in my lifetime, but the liberty-minded can make it possible for newer generations by avidly defending ourselves against collectivism today. As pointed out in the beginning, collectivism and individualism cannot coexist; confrontation is inevitable. Recognizing this, and preparing for it, is our duty as free human beings.

If you would like to support the publishing of articles like the one you have just read, visit our donations page here.  We greatly appreciate your patronage.

Brandon Smith is the founder of the Alternative Market Project, an organization designed to help you find like-minded activists and preppers in your local area so that you can network and construct communities for barter and mutual aid. Join today and learn what it means to step away from the unstable mainstream system and build something better. You can contact Brandon Smith at: [email protected].

UN Court To Judge America For “Climate Crimes!” Welcome To The New World Order! (VIDEO)


As many of you are now aware the globalists leaders of the United Nations will be gathering together once again for another Climate Summit in Paris, France on November 20th – December 11th of this year. It is at this assembly that nations have prepared a treaty that creates an “International Tribunal of Climate Justice.” The “tribunals” purpose is to grant Third World countries the power to haul countries like the United States into a global court with enforcement powers. If this were to pass at the Summit, then Congress would obviously have no say in the matter and our policies will be handed over to the United Nations resulting in a world class of ruling elite via a “world court.” 

Page 19 of the treaty reads as follows:

[An International Tribunal of Climate Justice as][A] [compliance mechanism] is hereby established to address cases of non-compliance of the commitments of developed country Parties on mitigation, adaptation, [provision of] finance, technology development and transfer [and][,] capacity-building[,] and transparency of action and support, including through the development of an indicative list of consequences, taking into account the cause, type, degree and frequency of non-compliance.

A facilitative mechanism is hereby established to facilitate implementation by developing country Parties for enhanced action on mitigation, adaptation and transparency of action. The mechanism shall be facilitative, nonpunitive, non-adversarial and non-judicial.]

Furthermore the draft goes on to detail how this tribunal will enforce issues such as “climate justice,” “climate finance,” “technology transfers,” and “climate debt.”

Here is the breaking report…

“Whatever they call it, countries who sign onto this agreement will be voting to expand the reach of the UN climate bureaucracy, cede national sovereignty, and create a one-way street along which billions will be redistributed from developed to poor nations. Developed nations would be expected to slash their emissions while the “poor” countries expand theirs.  China, which holds a trillion dollars in U.S. debt, would be counted among the poor.” Craig Rucker Executive Director at and co-founder of CFACT

For More Information See:

UNFCCC Document (PDF file)-

WND News-

Tracking Sustainable Development:

New American ;

Lisa Haven is an independent Christian news analysis and one of the top contributors on She is also author of and runs her own youtube channel (Lisa Haven) with tens-of-thousands of views per day. Digging deep and finding truth is what she lives for. Her passion is to spread truth no matter where it lies. She covers everything from martial law, to FEMA camps, to end time bible prophecy, to government documents and much more! Before launching her journalism career, she wrote many bible studies and lead women ministries for a number of years. She will also complete her ministry degree at International School of Ministry this year.

Codex Alimentarius: A Serious Threat To Your Health

Codex Alimentarius

Imagine a world where you need a doctor’s prescription (and thus, health insurance), to buy your every-day organic health supplements.

Imagine a world where some of your most-trusted vitamins and supplements are not even on the market!

If this sounds like a bad scene from Big Brother, think again. Our government may be advancing towards giving more and more power to the Codex Alimentarius trade commission, an organization created to limit and control the freedom to buy every day supplements, vitamins, minerals, and even organic foods.

What is Codex Alimentarius?

Codex Alimentarius is a “trade commission” created by the UN in attempt to control all aspects of how food and nutritional supplements are exchanged through buyer and consumer networks.

In Latin, “Codex Alimentarius” literally translates into “food rules.” And even though the UN claims that the goals of Codex Alimentarius are geared towards “protecting the health of the consumers and ensuring fair trade practices in the food trade, and promoting coordination of all food standards work undertaken by international governmental and non-governmental organizations,” it is clear that this organization is more about control and multi-national profits, than protecting the average consumer.

It is important to understand that this organization is not a consumer protection agency, nor a human rights agency, nor a public health organization. This organization is a trade-based commission, whose goals are clearly profit-focused. In fact, the basis of the Codex Alimentarius poses a huge threat to our basic freedoms of choice in terms of health and well-being.

What are the future plans of Codex?

Codex plans to bolster extreme opposition against natural forms of medicine and nutrition. One standard which was approved in 2005 was called the Codex Alimentarius Vitamin and Mineral Guideline (VMG), a document which has the power to ban many powerful vitamins and mineral supplements under the basis of for-hire studies.

This means, the organization pays scientists and doctors to tell them what is most profitable to hear. From there, more money will go to the pharmaceutical industry over natural remedies. One measure even bans Vitamin C to servings of only several milligrams.

Other Frightening Codex Standards Include:

  • Steep laws governing food and nutritional supplements
  • Laws governing our rights to grow organic seeds
  • Laws governing our rights to buy organic produce
  • An increase on tight FDA rules on food and supplements

Why is the Government Trying to Control Our Supplements?

The natural health and supplement industries represent a growing sector of the economy. As profits on natural living increase, big pharmaceutical companies, as well as big-Agro businesses, are beginning to feel threatened.

If they can enact stricter laws controlling supplements, consumers like yourself, will have less freedom to choose a pro-active approach to health and healing. In this sense, these laws could potentially endanger our ability to care for ourselves naturally.

Dr. Edward F. Group III, DC, NP, DACBN, DCBCN, DABFM has studied natural healing methods for over 20 years and now teaches individuals and practitioners all around the world. He no longer sees patients but solely concentrates on spreading the word of health and wellness to the global community. Under his leadership, Global Healing Center, Inc. has earned recognition as one of the largest alternative, natural and organic health resources on the Internet.

Internet Is Less Safe, Less Free And Less Private


(The Real Agenda) The world wide web is becoming a police state in itself where users, who have paid for its construction and dissemination, are less safe and less free to navigate.

Internet freedom has declined for the fifth consecutive year, and, not surprisingly governments are the parties the bear the bulk of the responsibility for such a decrease as they are the ones imposing restrictions on the rights of Internet users and illegally monitoring their activity.

These are some conclusions of the report published by Freedom House, an organisation that analyzed the current state Internet freedom in 65 countries.

The study indicates that more and more governments try to censor information that is of general interest and puts pressure on the private sector to remove content they do not approve.

Although some of the grossest infringements on Internet freedom are though to be committed in places like China or North Korea, the truth is that western Internet users seem to be the ones who are losing their abilities to navigate the net at a higher speed.

Right now, more than 3 billion people surf the Internet, with 61% of them doing so in countries where criticism of the government, the army or families who are in power have been censured.

The 2015 Internet Freedom Report argues that there has been an escalation in arrests and intimidation on users. In 40 of the 65 countries surveyed last year they governments jailed people for having shared content through social networks.

In seven of those cases, people were handed down convictions of 7 years or more more. In China, a court sentenced an academic to life imprisonment for “encouraging separatism” through a website.

The organization conducted the study between June 1, 2014 and May 31, 2015. The classification is based on three parameters: the barriers to Internet access; the limits on content, and violations of the rights of users, including monitoring, persecution, harassment or attacks on the Internet.

According to the results obtained from the 65 countries there are 18 nations where people are “free” to navigate the net. They include Estonia, Canada, Germany and Australia. Meanwhile, most countries fall within the partly free category. This group includes Turkey, Mexico, Colombia and India. The countries that have no freedom include Cuba, Syria, Iran and Ethiopia, among others. Iceland is the country with the best grade and China is the worst.

“In many ways, the past year has been one of consolidation and adaptation of the restrictions on the Internet. Governments had already expanded their arsenal of tools to control the digital environment and are now reinforcing the application of these methods,” explains the report.

According to the study, countries that have experienced a greater fall in Internet freedom are Libya where increased violence against bloggers has risen and there have been cases of political censorship as well as a rise in prices of Internet services; Ukraine, with persecution of users because of criticism against the government in Kiev; and France, which, following the attacks in Paris, adopted restrictive legislation on the net.

Surveillance has been increasing worldwide. This is one of the major trends identified by Freedom House. In 14 democratic countries like France and Australia governments have adopted new measures authorizing these practices, “driven in part by concerns about terrorism and the spread of the Islamic State”.

Cyber-technology companies and international organizations have criticized the laws requiring the blanket retention of so-called metadata on the grounds that they violate the integrity, security and privacy of their communication systems.

Another conclusion reached by Freedom House is the turnaround when it comes to censorship of Internet content. Internet users are increasingly prepared to dodge the censorship, so  governments choose to apply restrictions to both users and the private sector to achieve the removal of content that they find annoying.

In the best cases of censorship and under so-called political correctness, authorities are pushing demands to withdraw information they consider offensive. In the worst cases, law enforcement uses intimidation and torture.

Users have been restricted in their attempt to protect themselves from governments and their restrictions as authorities have sought to reduce the possibility of network protection. Now, intelligence agencies have taken steps to ban encryption and anonymity, two important tools in the case of journalists and human rights activists, for example, who use these tools to protect their freedom of expression against government oppression.

The study also collects information on positive outcomes that help improve Internet freedom.  Freedom House states that 15 countries have registered improvements. The main achievements, the report says, are due to legislative changes or court decisions and it concludes: “Digital activism has been and remains the main promoter of change around the world, particularly in societies lacking political rights and press freedom.”

Luis R. Miranda is an award-winning journalist and the founder and editor-in-chief at The Real Agenda. His career spans over 18 years and almost every form of news media. His articles include subjects such as environmentalism, Agenda 21, climate change, geopolitics, globalisation, health, vaccines, food safety, corporate control of governments, immigration and banking cartels, among others. Luis has worked as a news reporter, on-air personality for Live and Live-to-tape news programs. He has also worked as a script writer, producer and co-producer on broadcast news. Read more about Luis.