Category Archives: Government Control

Something So Dangerous It Is Sure To Spark A Revolution That Will Change The Future Forever (VIDEO)

dont tread on me

So how close are we really to martial law and FEMA camps? Do I begin with the fact that out government is secretly preparing for all hell to break loose and doing massive military drills across the nation? Or do I begin with the fact that the US is agreeing to the UN Arms Treaty putting major limitations on our guns? Or do I start with the fact that  our government has documentation creating FEMA camps? Or the fact that they issued a bulletin attacking patriots? Or? Or? Or? The list is almost endless! All I know is something huge is coming our way many of us can feel it…

I URGE you to watch the video below in its entirety! It covers all the above and more and uses factually documentation to back up the claim. It is a real eye-opener to everything that is transpiring around us, but I must warn you, it just might enrage you when you see whats really going on…

“Of all the troubling aspects of the Obama presidency, none is more dangerous than the President’s persistent pattern of lawlessness, his willingness to disregard the written law and instead enforce his own policies via executive fiat…the President’s taste for unilateral action to circumvent Congress should concern every citizen, regardless of party or ideology.” Senator Ted Cruz in The Wall Street Journal

Americans will soon have little recourse against a government bent on controlling every aspect of their lives, and the way our country is headed freedom will be on the endangered species list.

With the passage of the NDAA our government is operating with impunity, overriding Posse Comitatus, and allowing the military unchecked power to arrest, detain, interrogate and even assassinate its patriots. Including detaining them indefinitely without cause. We are losing our freedoms by the minute and have arrived at a critical breaking point. America is unrecognizable in this state and we have hit the nightmare scenario.

I assure you that one day soon we will experience persecution on a much broader scale. It’s not a question of if, but a question of when. Executive orders have been signed by our President, labor camps have been setup, our government has stockpiled guns and ammo, and Christians, patriots, homeschoolers, gun owners, and veterans have been placed on terrorist watch lists. The Bible even foretells of people being rounded up to FEMA camps…

“They will lay hands on you and persecute you. They will deliver you to synagogues and prisons, and you will be brought before kings and governors, and all on account of my name.” Luke 21:12

Furthermore a document was leaked back in February 2010, called FM 3-39.40 Internment and Resettlement Operations, in this manual it outlines the full blown concept of re-education centers (Read the Document  Here).

The “Psychological Operations Officers” are the ones responsible for re-educating the masses. According  to the document, “the PSYOP… are designed to pacify and acclimate detainees to accept U.S. I/R facility authority and regulations.”

The following roles have been assigned to this PSYOP team (According to Chapter 3 of the Document pg.56):

1. Identify malcontents, trained agitators, and political leaders within the facility who may try to organize resistance or create disturbances.

2. Develops and execute indoctrination programs to reduce or remove antagonistic attitudes.

3. Identifies political activists.

4. Help the military police commander control detainee and populations during emergencies.

5. Plans and executes a PSYOP program that produces an understanding and appreciation of U.S. policies and actions.

This document is not talking about military personal or those detained in war. It specifically targets people “within the U.S. territory. “

Also if you haven’t heard already Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia predicted that the court will soon authorize the use of internment camps just like they did during World War II.

Scalia told the University of Hawaii law school while discussing Korematsu v. United States (the ruling in which the court gave its imprimatur to the internment camps), “You are kidding yourself if you think the same thing will not happen again.”

But that’s not all! How about these shocking quotes from the Joint FBI and DHS bulletin talked about in the video above:

“Domestic extremism, however, remains a persistent threat, and the United States has experienced violent ideologically motivated criminal acts, both prior to and after the Oklahoma City attack…. Many of the same motivations used by domestic extremists to justify their criminal acts in the mid-1990s—anti-government and anti-law enforcement sentiment; racial, ethnic, and religious hatred; and advocacy of violent conspiracy theories—continue to influence domestic extremists and their targeting choices in 2015.” (page 2)

“FBI and DHS assess with high confidence that domestic extremism will remain a persistent threat through the end of 2015 and beyond.” (Page 5)

So what is FBI’s and DHS’s definition of a domestic extremist, militia extremists, and Sovereign Citizen Extremists? Here are the answers:

“Domestic Extremists: individuals present in the United States who seek to further political or social goals, wholly or in part, through unlawful acts of force or violence. The mere advocacy of political or social positions, political activism, use of strong rhetoric, or generalized philosophic embrace of violent tactics may not constitute extremism, and may be constitutionally protected. This definition does not include or describe homegrown violent extremists, who are defined by the FBI as al-Qa’ida-inspired individuals based in the United States and radicalized primarily in the United States, and are not directly collaborating with a foreign terrorist organization.” (pg.6)

“Militia Extremists: individuals who seek, wholly or in part, to engage in unlawful acts of force or violence in response to perceived abuses of power or authority by government, perceived threats to Constitutional rights by government, or bureaucratic incompetence in attending to critical tasks. The mere advocacy of political or social positions, political activism, use of strong rhetoric, or generalized philosophic embrace of violent tactics may not constitute extremism, and may be constitutionally protected.” (pg.6)

“Sovereign Citizen Extremists: individuals who openly reject their US citizenship status, believe that most forms of established government, authority, and institutions are illegitimate, and seek, wholly or in part, through unlawful acts of force or violence, to further their claim to be immune from government authority. The mere advocacy of political or social positions, political activism, use of strong rhetoric, or generalized philosophic embrace of violent tactics may not constitute extremism, and may be constitutionally protected.” (pg.6)

The fact of the matter is, we have truly come down to the wire, please be ready!! Time is not something we have much left of…

For More Information See:

Michigan National Guard “Northern Strike”: http://www.wnem.com/story/29582108/michigan-national-guard-northern-strike

Army Document: http://armypubs.army.mil/eng/DR_pubs/dr_a/pdf/tm5_601.pdf

Ark 2 Bunker: http://www.offthegridnews.com/current-events/government-raid-targets-off-grid-mans-underground-bunker/

Naturalized Citizens don’t have to pledge to defend: http://rightwingnews.com/democrats/obama-changes-oath-of-allegiance-for-new-americans-takes-out-pledge-to-defend-the-usa/

Gov’t Seize Medical Records: http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/07/feds_get_the_power_to_seize_medical_records_on_fishing_expedition_investigations_with_no_subpoena_from_a_judge.html

NORAD bunker reopen: http://www.csindy.com/IndyBlog/archives/2015/04/14/norad-returns-to-cheyenne-mountain-bunker-sorta

How to Survive Martial law: http://nstarzone.com/LAW.html


Lisa Haven is an independent Christian news analysis and one of the top contributors on www.BeforeItsNews.com. She is also author of www.LisaHavenNews.net and runs her own youtube channel (Lisa Haven) with tens-of-thousands of views per day. Digging deep and finding truth is what she lives for. Her passion is to spread truth no matter where it lies. She covers everything from martial law, to FEMA camps, to end time bible prophecy, to government documents and much more! Before launching her journalism career, she wrote many bible studies and lead women ministries for a number of years. She will also complete her ministry degree at International School of Ministry this year.

Mandatory Vaccinations Afoot: Medical Fascism Approaching Fast

The gun now backs the syringe: California’s 2 bills (SB277 and SB792) require mandatory vaccinations for children and adults, in total opposition to America’s foundation of individual rights and freedom. The Government believes it owns your body. Will you let it?

The gun now backs the syringe: California’s 2 bills (SB277 and SB792) require mandatory vaccinations for children and adults, in total opposition to America’s foundation of individual rights and freedom. The Government believes it owns your body. Will you let it?

Mandatory vaccinations are afoot as California has just achieved the horrific distinction of becoming the first state in the US to introduce compulsory vaccinations for both children and adults (bills SB277 and SB792 respectively). This goes to show that the NWO (New World Order) agenda of collectivism and medical fascism is fast approaching. There is no more time to sit on the fence, debate things intellectually or hide behind the excuse that certain agendas and events are just unprovable conspiracies. Suddenly it’s getting pretty real. By introducing mandatory vaccinations, the Government is essentially claiming it owns your body, it knows best when it comes to medicine and health, that the science behind vaccines is settled, and that it has the right to violate you if it deems in doing do that it’s “protecting the greater good”. How many people out there still consider that the Government forcibly injecting you with at least 10 toxic and carcinogenic vaccine adjuvants (such as mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde, diploid cells from aborted fetal tissue, MSG, etc.) is not a violation?

Australia and Other Nations Also on Road to Mandatory Vaccinations

The Rockefeller Medicine-Big Pharma-NWO push towards mandatory vaccinations is unfortunately not limited to the USA. It’s worldwide. In April I wrote about how Australia, sadly, was following lockstep in the footprints of the US and becoming GMO and Vaccine Australia. In attempting to boost the immunization rate, the Australian Government removed religious exemptions for vaccines, bribed (“incentivized”) doctors to inject more of their patients and financially punished people by tightening up welfare eligibility for parents who fail to vaccinate their children. Other nations that already have mandatory vaccination laws (either at a state or federal level) include Malaysia, Latvia, Slovenia and Croatia.

WHO Can Order Mandatory Vaccinations in All 194 Signatory Nations

To those who have been following the unfolding of the New World Order, it is also unsurprising that the WHO (World Health Organization), another subsidiary of the Rockefeller-created UN (United Nations), has laws on its books to be able to declare mandatory vaccinations in all its 194 signatory states. As Jane Burgermeister reports:

“The International Health Regulations (IHR) pursuant to Article 21 of the Constitution of WHO came into force in June 2007 and allow the General-Director of WHO to declare an international health emergency. In such a case, the Director-General can impose regulations, including “sanitary and quarantine requirements and other procedures designed to prevent the international spread of disease”, also travel restrictions. 

In the event of WHO declaring a pandemie, WHO has the authority to order forced vaccinations around the world.

All 194 signatory countries to IHR must comply.”

Funny how all these organizations like the UN, WHO and the US Government have “Generals” like a Director-General, Surgeon-General or a Secretary-General. Maybe it’s because they’re actually corporate and military organizations in disguise – with the intent and possibly the partial ability to force things like mandatory vaccinations on the population.

Airplane Companies Discussing Mandatory Vaccinations Too

It seems the medical fascism is not limited to the ground. There were reports in February 2015 of airline companies considering the possibility of introducing mandatory vaccinations also. Thankfully nothing has transpired from this … yet. However the mere fact that airlines were even toying with the idea of forcing people to get vaccinated in order to board a plane is very ominous. We are facing the very real possibility that, if we do not submit and bow down to Big Pharma, with all its bribery, undue political influence, fraudulent marketing, falsification of data and junk science, we will lose our rights and freedoms, or the ability to live a “normal” life in this day and age, which includes things like air travel.

Idea of Mandatory Vaccinations Based on Pseudoscientific Myth of Herd Immunity

The main excuse and justification rolled out by Government, Big Pharma, the Western medical establishment and other pro-vaxxers for a national or global scheme like mandatory vaccinations is herd immunity. Behind that is the idea of collectivism or “for the greater good”. As I discussed in the article “Herd Immunity vs. Viral Shedding: Who’s Infecting Whom?“, herd immunity is a pseudoscientific myth. For starters, vaccine-induced immunity is not equivalent to real naturally-acquired immunity. Logic dictates that if vaccines really worked, the vaccinated would have no need to worry about a disease supposedly being spread by the unvaccinated, because the vaccinated would be protected. The very fact that they are worrying shows that there is serious doubt over the efficacy of vaccines.

Mandatory Vaccinations = Medical Fascism and Collectivism

Even if vaccines were 100% effective on everyone all of the time – which is very very far from the truth – mandatory vaccinations are still a horribly tyrannical manifestation of collectivism, the notion that all individuals must sacrifice their rights, desires and freedom for the greater good. Of course, the greater good is always defined by the State, or the small group of usually power-hungry individuals who have gained control of the helm of Government. The Government is now trying to claim it has the legal right to do what it wants with your body, including injecting full of poisons disguised as “medicine”, for whatever noble-sounding pretext it comes up with.

We have entered a dangerous chapter in the evolution of our society; we can only hope enough individuals recognize the inherent tyranny of mandatory vaccinations and rise up against them. Even people like Dr. Ron Paul, who as a Western medical doctor is actually in favor of vaccines, spoke out against the idea of compulsory vaccinations on the grounds of libertarianism and individual rights, which just goes to show that you don’t have to be against vaccines to believe in basic liberty.

Of course, whether people will comply with such oppression as mandatory vaccinations remains to be seen …

 

Sources:

https://birdflu666.wordpress.com/2009/07/09/who-has-the-power-to-order-forced-vaccines-in-194-countries/

http://nationalreport.net/airlines-consider-requiring-proof-vaccination-domestic-air-travel/

http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2015/february/08/vaccine-controversy-shows-why-we-need-markets-not-mandates/


Makia Freeman is the editor of The Freedom Articles and senior researcher at ToolsForFreedom.com, writing on many aspects of the global conspiracy, from vaccines to Zionism to false flag operations and more, and also including info on natural health, sovereignty and higher consciousness.

Forbidden History The Ultimate Taboo

Mayer_Amschel_Rothschild_NWO

People are dumb because they do not know and refuse to learn the real history behind world events. Educational institutions do not function as seekers of truth, but as gatekeepers for narratives that defy common sense and defame historical facts. Society fosters the ultimate taboo against chronicles that differ with the established story of distortions and misdirection. Anyone who dares waver from accepted limits and suppositions immediately is a quack or an extremist. The dreaded label of being a conspiracy theorist, used to smear and marginalize researchers and pundits, is the height of anti-intellectualism and characterassassination.

The dim-witted public, told to shun contradictory accounts, interpretations and disturbing explanations accepts sham history. The accurate course of events must remain hidden from the masses. The subject of a New World Order is not newfound. The process of world domination is as old as the formation of the first empire. Despite the annals of war and governments, the actual power that enslaves civilizations and humanity, is evil itself, in its purist form and manifestation.

ADLbrand_jpg_w300h169The entire globe, engulfed in a prison of authoritarian control, already pays the price of scholarly surrender. Use whatever term or description you like or accept. The definitive fact is that the moneychangers operate and pull the institutional levers that keep locks on your mind and pocketbook, while keeping your vision focused on a make-believe reality.

In order to break the blockade that stifles all those Edith Bunker brain surgeons, especially in academia, grow a set of gonads and reach deep down inside for that which is left of your moral courage. Examine the following detailed summary of events. Elites and enemies of Western Civilization want to dumb you down. It takes unembellished chutzpah to come to terms with truthful history.

A prolonged visit and extensive review of the all the material covered in this thorough and comprehensive assessment could be a liberating opportunity to regain sight and end the blindness of the NWO mind control. Mike King presents an Alternative History, Philosophy and Current Events account on the tomatobubble.com site. A sample of this information follows:

gtomatobnnrNWO FORBIDDEN HISTORY: TIMELINE OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER1763-1816

The Currency Act of 1764 is a British action that imposes a monetary policy on its American colonies. The Act extends the provisions of the Currency Act of 1751 and forbids the American colonies from issuing debt-free paper currency as legal tender.

When the First Continental Congress meets in 1774, it objects to The Currency Act as “subversive of American rights” and calls for its repeal.

It is a little known fact of the American Revolution, that the right of the colonial governments to issue their own debt-free currency, and spend it into circulation (as opposed to a private Central Bank printing and lending its debt-currency into circulation), was one of the main causes of the coming American Revolution.

1820-1880

During the 64 year reign of Queen Victoria (1837-1901) Great Britain will experience a transformation from a Constitutional Monarchy to a totally Rothschild owned “democracy”. Three assassination attempts against Victoria during the turbulent 1840’s, further attempts on her in 1872 and 1882, and the many other attempts and murders of European Kings in the coming years, combine to send a clear and intimidating message to the British Monarchy: The Rothschild Family, not the “Royal Family”, rules the British Empire.

The Rothschilds view the American US Civil War as a chance to “divide and conquer” America. If the South can break away from the Union, two rival nations can be played off against each other in a European style game of “balance-of-power.”

Lincoln needs money to fund the war. He is extorted by the New York bankers, who want the government to sell high interest bonds to them, which they can then resell to the banking syndicate in London. Lincoln writes:

“I have the Confederacy before me and the bankers behind me, and for America, I fear the bankers most.”

Lincoln thwarts the bankers by issuing interest-free currency directly from the Treasury. (Greenbacks)

1881-1910

Republican President McKinley is a staunch advocate of “hard money” (Gold Standard) and limited constitutional government. McKinley is re-elected in 1900. Less than one year later, a foreign-born Red terrorist named Leon Czolgosz shoots McKinley in Buffalo, NY. Czolgosz is a follower of the Jewish Red Emma Goldman, who openly praises Czolgosz’s evil deed!

McKinley recovers briefly, and then turns for the worse, finally dying on September 14. His death launches the Globalist puppet Teddy Roosevelt into office, completing TR’s amazing ascent from obscurity to the White House in just two years! The convenient murder of McKinley marks the beginning of “The Progressive Era” in which the Federal government will expand its power and foreign involvement.

1911-1920

After many years of strategic political preparation, the Globalist-Zionist New World Order now has 7 major goals its wants to achieve in coming decade:

1. Establish a US Central Bank conceived at Jekyll Island.

2. Impose an income tax on America so that State debt to the Central Bank can be collateralized with human labor.

3. Trigger the long planned Triple Entente-Triple Alliance World War to destroy Germany and reshape Europe.

4. Entangle the mighty USA in the coming European war and the emerging World Government movement.

5. Finish off Czarist Russia once and for all and convert the Eurasian giant into a Communist nation.

6. Establish a World Political Body under the pretext of “world peace” after the war is over.

7. Carry out Zionist Herzl’s 1897 plan to take Palestine away from the Ottoman Turks & Arabs.

The popular Republican President William Howard Taft will never involve America in such treasonous schemes. So the Globalists recruit a weak professor from Princeton named Woodrow Wilson. Wilson is rocketed to Governor of New Jersey, and then to Democrat nominee for President in 1912. In order to steal Republican votes from Taft, the NWO recruits ex-President Teddy Roosevelt to ran as the Progressive Party candidate (also known as Bull-Moose Party).

1921-1930

Pledging a “return to normalcy”, Warren Harding (R-OH) is elected President in 1920. An opponent of entry into the League of Nations, his victory over James Cox (D-OH) and his VP running mate Franklin D Roosevelt (TR’s cousin), is the largest Presidential Election landslide in America’s history (60%-34%)!

Harding inherits a Wilsonian economic Depression. He quickly moves to slash income taxes, and will cut government spending by 50%. With the private economy now freed from the parasitic dead weight of big government, an historic economic boom soon follows.

Harding’s support for free markets, limited government, low taxes, neutral foreign policy, and his refusal to grant diplomatic recognition to the murderous Soviet Union, are all positions that anger the Globalists. An intense newspaper smear campaign regarding “scandals” in Harding’s administration is then unleashed against the highly popular President.

1931-1939

A prominent Congressman who dares to accuse the Fed is the Chairman of the House Banking Committee: Louis McFadden (R-PA). In a June 10 speech, McFadden puts the blame directly on the international bankers for fomenting the Russian Revolution, crashing the US economy, and robbing the American people. McFadden pulls no punches:

“(The Fed) was deceitfully and disloyally foisted upon this country by the bankers who came here from Europe and repaid us for our hospitality by undermining our American institutions. Those bankers took money out of this country to finance Japan in a war against Russia. They financed Trotsky’s passage from New York to Russia so that he might assist in the destruction of the Russian Empire. …What king ever robbed his subjects to such an extent as the Federal Reserve has robbed us?”

*************

These snippets, mostly tract the American experience. However, the summary of European intrigue and the unending NWO struggle to eradicate Christian governments, as well as the elimination and destruction of divinely created cosmology, has profound cultural, social and political repercussions. Honest searchers of the truth should investigate the full text of this important chronology for further confirmation and read the Invisible Hand, which our esteemed colleague, Al Cronkrite writes with authority.

The great Lysander Spooner utters the immortal maxim:

“The Rothschilds, and that class of money-lenders of whom they are the representatives and agents – men who never think of lending a shilling to their next-door neighbors, for purposes of honest industry, unless upon the most ample security, and at the highest rate of interest – stand ready, at all times, to lend money in unlimited amounts to those robbers and murderers, who call themselves governments, to be expended in shooting down those who do not submit quietly to being robbed and enslaved.”

Such an excellent summary on the way the world really operates. The forbidden history of dead Presidents, Vice Presidents, Prime Ministers, Kings, Queens and Czars just happened to materialize when their opposition to central banks conflicts with the timetable of the NWO.

Without a clear understanding of the multi-century game of attrition, that pits the forces of compound interest against the suckers that buy into the false storyline fed to them through the illusion of fantasyland tales of distraction – true history will remain taboo for most. So be it, that only brave hearts will comprehend correct reality.


SARTRE is the pen name of James Hall, a reformed, former political operative. This pundit’s formal instruction in History, Philosophy and Political Science served as training for activism, on the staff of several politicians and in many campaigns. A believer in authentic Public Service, independent business interests were pursued in the private sector. As a small business owner and entrepreneur, several successful ventures expanded opportunities for customers and employees. Speculation in markets, and international business investments, allowed for extensive travel and a world view for commerce. He is retired and lives with his wife in a rural community. “Populism” best describes the approach to SARTRE’s perspective on Politics. Realities, suggest that American Values can be restored with an appreciation of “Pragmatic Anarchism.” Reforms will require an Existential approach. “Ideas Move the World,” and SARTRE’S intent is to stir the conscience of those who desire to bring back a common sense, moral and traditional value culture for America. Not seeking fame nor fortune, SARTRE’s only goal is to ask the questions that few will dare … Having refused the invites of an academic career because of the hypocrisy of elite’s, the search for TRUTH is the challenge that is made to all readers. It starts within yourself and is achieved only with your sincere desire to face Reality. So who is SARTRE? He is really an ordinary man just like you, who invites you to join in on this journey. Visit his website at http://batr.org.

Liberty Movement Needs More Innovations To Counter Technological Tyranny

lemv%20airship

The great lesson from history that each consecutive generations seems to forget is that the tools of tyranny used outward will inevitably be turned inward. That is to say, the laws and weapons governments devise for supposed enemies abroad will ALWAYS and eventually be used against the people they are mandated to protect. There is no centralized system so trustworthy, no political establishment so free of corruption that the blind faith of the citizenry is warranted. If free people do not remain vigilant they will be made slaves by their own leadership. This is the rule, not the exception, and it applies to America as much as any other society.

The beauty of the con game that is the “war on terror” is that such a war is ultimately undefinable. An undefinable war has no set enemy; the establishment can change the definition of the “enemy” at will to any culture, country, or group it wishes. Thus, the war on terror can and will last forever. Or, at least, it will last as long as corrupt elitists remain in positions of power.

As I have outlined in past articles, most terror groups are creations of our nation’s own covert intelligence apparatus, or the covert agencies of allied governments.

ISIS is perhaps the most openly engineered terror organization of all time (surpassing Operation Gladio), with U.S. elites and purported anti-Muslim terror champions like Sen. John McCain and Gen. Paul Vallely making deals with “moderate” Free Syrian Army rebels who immediately turn out to be full fledged ISIS fighters (I’m sure they were not “surprised” by this outcome) and the Obama Administration blatantly funding and arming more “moderates” which again in turn seem to be crossing over into the hands of ISIS. Frankly, the whole idea that there is a moderate front in places like Syria where alphabet agencies reign supreme is utterly absurd.

The bottom line – our political leadership, Republican and Democrat alike, created ISIS out of thin air, and now the American people are being expected to relinquish more individual liberties in the name of stopping this fabricated threat. Apparently, the Orwellian police state structures built under the auspices of the Patriot Act, the AUMF, the NDAA, FISA, etc. have not been enough to stop events like the Chatanooga shooting from occurring. So, what is the answer? Well, certainly not a reexamination of our insane foreign policy or an investigation into government funded false flag terrorism; that would make too much sense.

Instead, the establishment claims we need MORE mass surveillance without warrants, tighter restrictions on individual freedoms, and even, according to retired General Wesley Clark, internment camps designed to separate and confine “disloyal” Americans from the rest of the population.

Remember, all of this is being suggested in the name of stopping ISIS, but the language being used by political elites does not restrict such actions to ISIS related “extremists”. Once again, the war on terror is an ambiguous war, so ambiguous that internment camps supposedly meant for those the government labels POTENTIAL Islamic extremists could also be used for potential extremists of any group. Once the fuse is lit on the process of rendition, black bagging, internment, and assassination of citizens, any citizens, without trial, there will be no stopping the powder keg explosion to follow.

I believe that the power brokers that dictate legal and political developments within our country are preparing to turn the full force of the police state machine against the American people, all in the name of protecting us, of course. I do not need their brand of “protection”, and neither does anyone else.

It comes down to this – in the face of an increasingly advanced technological control grid, either liberty movement activists and freedom fighters must develop our own countermeasures, or, we will lose everything, and every generation after us will blame us for our inaction, if they remember us at all.

Keep in mind a countermeasure must be decentralized. Bitcoin, for instance, is NOT a practical countermeasure being that it relies on a centralized and monitored global internet in order to function. It also does not encourage any tangible production capabilities or skill sets. Therefore, it does not provide for the function of a true alternative economy. It is a false solution and a useless countermeasure to a fiat currency based economy.

A real countermeasure to a controlled economy, for instance, would be a localized barter economy in which people must develop ways to produce, rather than play make believe with digital cryptocurrencies.

Countermeasures do not always have to be high tech. In fact, I am a staunch believer in the advantages of low tech solutions to high tech tyranny. As many are already aware, with the aid of Oath Keepers I recently developed a long term wearable cloak system which defeats FLIR thermal imaging, including military grade thermal imaging. Something which has never been offered on the civilian market before.

But this is only one countermeasure to one major threat. I will continue to work on defenses in other areas in which I feel I am best qualified, however, the movement needs more R&D, and we need it NOW before it is too late. I would like to suggest some possible dangers, and how people with far more knowledge than myself could create tools for defeating tyranny. I would also like to examine some simple organizational countermeasures which EVERYONE should be undertaking right now.

Community Defense

This is an amazing countermeasure for the liberty movement because it removes the monopoly of state control over individual security. Nothing pisses off the establishment more than people taking individual and community defense into their own hands. Fear is the greatest weapon of a corrupt government, and if they can’t keep you afraid because you are your own security, then they have lost considerable leverage over you.

This dynamic is represented perfectly in the Oath Keepers Community Preparedness Team model, which has been utilized successfully in places like Ferguson, MO. Today, in the wake of the Chatanooga shootings, Oath Keeper teams are volunteering across the nation to stand guard (discreetly) at military recruiting offices. The recruiters themselves, who are forced to remain disarmed by the DoD, appear to be thankful for the Oath Keeper presence. This kind of effort shows those in the military that the liberty movement is not the great homegrown monster that the government and the SPLC have made us out to be. It also throws a monkey wrench into the use of false flag terrorism or terrorism funded by covert agencies (as ISIS is) as a means to herd the masses into totalitarianism in the name of safety.

You might not be an engineer, or a tactician, but anyone can and should be organizing security teams for the places they live. Nothing could be more important.

Community Food Reserve

Am I talking about feeding your entire neighborhood or your entire town during a crisis? No, not necessarily. But, if you found an innovative way to make that possible, the rest of the movement would surely be grateful. Preppers do what they can for themselves and their families, but the bottom line is, if you are isolated and unorganized, all your prepping will be for naught. You are nothing more than an easy target and no amount of “OPSEC” is going to hide the fact that you will look well fed and healthy while everyone else doesn’t. The solution to this is to organize community defense, as stated above, but to also organize a community food reserve.

I highly suggest approaching already existing groups, like your local churches if they are willing to listen, and discussing the idea of food stores, water filtration, and shelter scenarios. If you can convince at least one community group to make preparations, you have just potentially saved numerous lives and stopped the exploitation of food scarcity as a means to dominate your local population during disaster.

WiFi Radar

Active WiFi based radar systems have been developed over the past several years which can see through walls (to a point) and potentially detect persons hiding in an urban environment. The number of radio frequency based radar projects coming out of the dark recesses of DARPA have been numerous, and each project appears to revolve around the goal of complete surveillance ability, or total information awareness. Such measures are not as effective against a technologically advanced opponent, but they could be very effective in dominating a lower tech civilian population.

WiFi radar in particular is a rather disturbing concept, and not a field that I am personally well versed. I have seen some examples of radio-wave based personnel tracking and have not been all that impressed with the visual results, but this is only what has been made available to the public. Sometimes, the DoD will present a technology that does not work as well as they claim in order to strike fear in the minds of their enemies. That said, sometimes they also use tech tools that work far better than they let on.

Luckily, radar countermeasure information is widely available to the public, and WiFi blocking and absorbing materials exist also. Liberty champions would do well, though, to look into active countermeasures along with passive, and devise methods for jamming WiFi radar altogether.

RFID Matrix

RFID chips are a passive technology but rather dangerous under certain conditions. With a grid of RFID readers in place in an environment such as a city, or a highway, a person could be tracked in real time every second of every day. He might not even know he is carrying a chip or multiple chips, the trackers being so small they could be sewn behind the button of a shirt.

This is one threat which would probably have to be solved with higher technology. I have seen RFID jamming and “spoofing” done by civilian computer engineers, mostly from foreign countries. But, this should not just be a hobby for computer experts in technical institutes. The Liberty Movement needs portable RFID jamming and spoofing capability to ensure that these chips, which are set to be ingrained in almost every existing product in the near future from clothing to cars to credit cards, can be rendered useless.

Drones Vs. Drones

The predator drone is not the biggest threat on the block anymore in terms of surveillance ability. DARPA has been working on other drone designs similar to the A160 Hummingbird and the MQ-8 Fire Scout; lightweight helicopter-style UAVs that can stay in the air for up to 24 hours and provide overwatch in a 30 mile area. And lets not forget about JLENS surveillance blimps (also ironically referred to as “ISIS” Integrated Sensor Is The Structure project) which can and are outfitted with high grade cameras and radar that can be used to track people from 10,000 feet up in the sky.

This is the future of combat operations and the lockdown of populations. Standard military units will be reduced as much as possible while UAVs will be deployed en masse. Air power has always been the biggest weakness of civilians seeking to counter corrupt governments, but this is actually changing.

While they may be lower tech in certain respects, civilian based drones are actually keeping pace with military projects, if only because military projects are restricted by bureaucracy and red tape while civilians are encouraged and emboldened by profit motive. Range and elevation limitations in the civilian market are purely legal right now, and such limitations will be of no concern once the SHTF. For the first time in history, common people now have the ability to field an aerial defense.

The DoD is well aware of this, and is already working on measures to counter enemy drones through their Black Dart and Switchblade program. The Liberty Movement needs its own Black Dart program.

Long Distance Radio And Codes

Regardless of the region they live, liberty activists should be developing their own radio code methods for secure communications. There are a few existing frequency hopping and coded radio systems out there on the civilian market, but these are short range units usually with around 1 watt of power. This makes them ideal for quick operational comms and difficult to listen in on simply because their range is so limited. That said, longer range radio communication will likely be essential for the spread of information from one region to the next, and no one should assume that regular phone and internet will be available in the future. News must travel somehow.

This means HAM radio, using mobile repeaters to avoid triangulation, and old school coded messages. The R&D portion of this issue I believe needs to be in the use of an Automatic Packet Reporting System (APRS) for the liberty movement regionally and nationwide. This is a kind of “texting” through HAM radio, and combining this with traditional low tech cipher coding may be our best bet for long range secure comms. It could also help defeat drones that intercept standard messages and use voice recognition software to identify targets.

Decentralized Internet

Information sharing makes or breaks a society. Without the web, the liberty movement would not have found the success it has today, and the alternative media would not exist, let alone be outmatching the readership ratings of mainstream media sources that have otherwise dominated news flow for decades. Unfortunately, the web is NOT a “creative commons” as many people believe. It is, as Edward Snowden’s revelations on the NSA proved, a highly controlled and monitored network in which there is essentially no privacy, even with the existence of cryptography.

The great threat to the establishment is the possibility that people will begin building an internet separate from the internet; a decentralized network. Recently, an inventor named Benjamin Caudill was slated to release a device called “Proxyham”, designed to reroute wifi signals and remove the possibility of government monitoring of digital communications. Strangely, just before the release of Proxyham, Caudill pulled all devices with the intent to destroy them, and will not be releasing the source code and blueprints to the public as planned.

Clearly, something or someone scared the hell out of Caudill, and he is rushing to appease them. We don’t know who for certain, but my vote is the NSA. And if this is the case, it means his project and others like it are a threat to the surveillance state, and must be released to the public ASAP. If Caudill doesn’t have the guts to do it, then the liberty movement must.

An alternative internet would be a holy grail in the fight against tyranny, if only to show the world that people can indeed decouple from the system and create advanced networks themselves, and do it better than the establishment.

These are just a few of the areas that require immediate attention from those with ingenuity in the liberty movement. The time for talk is over. The time for tangible action has begun. Beyond the need for immediate local organization by those preparing for social and economic breakdown, there is a desperate need for out-of-the-box thinkers to develop countermeasures to technological fascism. It’s time for the movement to go beyond mere intellectual analysis and provide concrete solutions. There is nothing left but this.

Alt-Market is now launching our annual Summer Donation Drive!
If you would like to support the publishing of articles like the one you have just read, visit our donations page here.  We greatly appreciate your patronage.

Brandon Smith is the founder of the Alternative Market Project, an organization designed to help you find like-minded activists and preppers in your local area so that you can network and construct communities for barter and mutual aid. Join www.Alt-Market.com today and learn what it means to step away from the unstable mainstream system and build something better. You can contact Brandon Smith at: [email protected].

Gov’t Issues Checkmate On Citizens: Vaccinate All Children Act Of 2015 (VIDEO)

government corruption

On May 1st, Frederica S. Wilson, a Florida Democrat Congresswoman, introduced a draconian legislation that would send chills down your spine! If passed the legislation would require all public school students to be fully vaccinated according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines. The proposed bill is called H.R.2232 and rightly titled— .

According to the bill:

REQUIREMENT.—For a State or a political subdivision or other public entity of a State to be eligible to receive a grant under this section, the applicant shall demonstrate to the Secretary’s satisfaction that, subject to paragraphs (2) and (3), the State requires each student enrolled in one of the State’s public elementary schools or public secondary schools to be vaccinated in accordance with the recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.

If the state refuses to abide by this law, they will pull the cities federal education grant funding—thereby forcing the issues of vaccination. Here is the breaking report…

“There are currently 271 vaccines in the development pipeline,” The Daily Sheeple

For More Information See:

https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/2232/titles

http://www.hhs.gov/nvpo/vacc_plan/index.html

http://www.hhs.gov/nvpo/national_adult_immunization_plan_draft.pdf

http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/downloads/child/0-18yrs-child-combined-schedule.pdf


Lisa Haven is an independent Christian news analysis and one of the top contributors on www.BeforeItsNews.com. She is also author of www.LisaHavenNews.net and runs her own youtube channel (Lisa Haven) with tens-of-thousands of views per day. Digging deep and finding truth is what she lives for. Her passion is to spread truth no matter where it lies. She covers everything from martial law, to FEMA camps, to end time bible prophecy, to government documents and much more! Before launching her journalism career, she wrote many bible studies and lead women ministries for a number of years. She will also complete her ministry degree at International School of Ministry this year.

Mandatory Adult Vaccines Coming To California Or GO TO JAIL! SB792 (VIDEO)

vaccine

Kenny Valenzuela breaks down the latest in California’s medical tyranny. First it was SB277 mandating vaccines for children; now it’s SB792 – mandatory adult vaccinations. No personal exemptions and criminal penalties for failure to comply. With 300 new vaccinations coming in the next 6 years, it seems like a good time to eliminate all opt-outs.

 

Research links:


California legislature SB-792 Day care facilities immunizations exemptions
California Mandates Poisoning Children SB277 Vaccine Bill Passes
California Now Wants to be First State to Mandate Adult Vaccines – Criminal Penalties
300 New Genetically Modified Vaccines by 2023
Mandatory Vaccines for Adults? Leave It to California
New York Measles Outbreak 90% Vaccinated
Senator Richard Pan Caught Lying About Aborted Fetal Cells in Vaccines!
FDA Vaccine Insert Lists Autism as Adverse Reaction

You can see more of Kenny Valenzuela’s informative videos, as well as donate, at ExperimentalVaccines.org 

CRAPPY ANNIVERSARY: Did We Walk on the Moon 46 Years Ago with 1960’s Technology? (VIDEOS)

 

apollo 11 moon landing hoax revised

“All Truth passes through three stages . . .

First, it is ridiculed . . .

Then, it is violently opposed . . .

Finally, it is accepted as self-evident.”

-Author Schopenhauer-

“In an age of universal deceit,

telling the truth is a revolutionary act.”

“Whoever controls the past, controls the future.”

-George Orwell-

“One of the saddest lessons of history is this:

If we’ve been bamboozled long enough,

we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle.

We’re no longer interested in finding out the truth.

The bamboozle has captured us.

It’s simply too painful to acknowledge,

even to ourselves,

that we’ve been taken.

Once you give a charlatan power over you,

you almost never get it back.”

Carl Sagan

“It is easier to fool people

than to convince them that they have been fooled.”

-Mark Twain-

{Videos at End in References}

There is an account in the scriptures where a zealous priest, thinking he was doing the work of God, persecuted true believers who he sincerely considered to be a heretical threat to divine truth.  (You see, you can be sincere, and be sincerely wrong.)  Then he had a conversion of thought, which led to a conversion of actions.  The leader of the group he was oppressing confronted him, and showed him that his beliefs were the exact opposite of the truth.  Willingly, and humbly, the priest completely changed his mind, heart and actions, one hundred percent, in regard to his entire life’s work and perception.  Why?  Because he was a seeker of the truth over tradition.  The battle for the truth is inevitably a battle between facts or tradition.

My life story in regard to the moon landings is exactly the same type of conversion.  My father was in the Air Force, so I grew up around the latest aviation and technology.  I loved it!  Though I was only four years of age at the time of the alleged moon landings in 1969, quietly asleep in bed, my father, as a celebrated military officer, was given a VIP package of commemorative photographs of the event, which he gave to me as a cherished present.  From the age of about four to fourteen, these pictures covered an entire “sacred” wall in my bedroom.  It was a shrine (like a religion) to the intellectual prowess of humankind (which indeed it did turn out to be!)  I saw these images, which were a representation of the alleged “glorious” American moon landings, every day, three hundred sixty-five days a year, for ten years.  This means I saw these images propagating the desired belief in their authenticity, three thousand six hundred fifty times before I even considered the possibility that they were misrepresentations of reality . . . That’s a lot of brainwashing!

Fortunately, at the age of fourteen, I saw an enlightened television program featuring an interview with William Kaysing, a NASA contractor during the Apollo “moon” missions.  He asserted quite confidently, from first hand eyewitness accounts, that the flights were staged to increase the prestige of the United States during the height of the Cold War, and the pit of domestic discontentment.  After watching the program, I went to my enshrined bedroom “wall of infamy” and looked, for the first time, with new eyes, at theses surprisingly telling pictures.  Sure enough, just like the man said, stunning evidence of photographic anomalies were hidden in plain sight!  (They say this is the very best place to hide something investigators are looking for!)  I just had to have “eyes that see”, after all a famous prophet notably said that most people “have eyes that do not see, and ears that do not hear”.

I equate this with a salt shaker always being placed in the left kitchen cabinet, on the third shelf, on the left side, for ten years.  If your spouse inadvertently moves it to the left kitchen cabinet, on the third shelf, on the right side . . . you don’t see it, even though it is right there in front of your eyes! . . . There you stand, with the cabinet door wide open, the salt shaker right in front of you only inches away (though on the right side of the shelf rather than the left, where you were trained not to look), and you do not see it! . . . There I was, looking at the same pictures of the alleged moon landings over and over again for a full decade, yet not seeing quite obvious inconsistencies and abnormalities that would quickly give away the deceptive criminality of the event, if only I would look beyond my programmed response!

Like everybody else, I was so conditioned by the media to see what they wanted me to see, that it took real effort on my part to discern succinctly fact from fiction, plus I had no mentor to point out my error.  (Read my article “Introduction” at the top of “Brother Bart’s  Conspiracy Corner” for further explanation on media manipulation.)  As Stanly Kubrick’s last film was entitled “Eyes Wide Shut!”, this was my and the populous’ simplistic error.  For example, at the top of this article you see what is the most published and well known photograph of the alleged moon landings, yet there are at least five telltale signs in this picture that give away the deception that are completely and repeatedly overlooked due to people seeing what they are conditioned to see.

First of all, what most people don’t notice is the ease at which the “astronaut” has his left arm bent at ninety degrees.  If he were really in outer space on a heavenly body without an atmosphere, then the spacesuit would have to be dramatically pressurized with compressed air, which it is obviously not due to the numerous wrinkles in the fabric and the ease at which they hold their arm bent at a right angel.  (The spacesuit should be puffed up like the “Michelin Man”.)

Secondly, if you look to the right of the actor, about waist high, just above the faint cross (+), you can see where the background changes from a faint grey color to a darker grey shading.  (In earlier pictures, which NASA later corrected, the color actually changed even more dramatically from grey to blue.)  This is where the real landscape and the false landscape (a large photograph on a the wall) converge!  In order to better get away with the deception of this fake backdrop, they have done two things. Initially, they rolled the real landscape slightly uphill before the wall began, so as to not make the distinction between the two as obvious. After this, and even more clever, the movie set they built was actually circular.  In order to discern the line between the fake backdrop and the real foreground you must look at a slightly upward angle to the right from the “astronaut’s” waist and perceive that they are standing near the wall of a set that is circular.

Thirdly, in the reflective visor of the actor (which conveniently conceals who is really in the spacesuit), you can notice that there are actually three degrees of shadow in front of them.  The darkest is of the person’s full body shadow and the shadow of the “lunar lander”.  The second is the faintest area of no shadow in the top left of the visor, just below the black horizon.  The third, medium shadow, actually encompasses the greatest area, as it is the shadow of the fake backdrop wall itself, casting a noticeably large angular shadow in the foreground in front of the person in the spacesuit, as the top of it was cut with less artistic esthetics because it was beyond the camera’s view and contains three noticeable ninety degree turns.  It is not discernable in the limited area of the photograph itself, yet is perceivable by “those that see” in the visor’s expanded reflection.

Fourthly, as even the designer of the camera which took the picture admitted in his interview on “Conspiracy Theory: Did We Land on the Moon” (the link of which is at end of this article), the “astronaut’s” shadow indicates that “the sun” (or rather the electrical light to represent it) is behind them, yet they are nevertheless also lit with supplemental electrical light from the front, none of which NASA admits they took on their mission, as they claimed that the bright natural sunlight on the moon, without clouds, was far more than ample.

Finally, just above and past the one o’clock position of the face visor, you see a hint of a small straight white line going up, yet it is inadvertently cut off.  Because the person is really standing on earth (in a film studio) and not on the moon’s much lighter gravity, they were being supported by cables from the ceiling so they would not topple over from the heavy backpack which was designed for one sixth the gravity.  Though the cables were undoubtedly painted black in an effort to conceal them in the black “outer space” background, they must have shown up anyway.  In their rush to conceal the cables, NASA’s “photo lab” just laid a piece of black masking on top of them, just above the height of the backpack.  Unfortunately for them, this cut off the radio transmitting antenna which should be sticking out of this part of the backpack as it does in all other photographs, yet the antenna is nowhere to be found!  How could they then communicate with people on earth a quarter million miles away without an antenna?  Oops!

In a way, like naïve Adam and Eve, you can’t blame people for initially being deceived, after all, which is a more pleasant realm to live in, one in which your country or world continually lies about science, integrity and spending, or one in which your country or world is scientifically unsurpassed, honorable and financially honest?  Naturally, people almost always seem to see the latter because this is the kind of realm they would rather live in.

Personally, if I had cancer, I would want to know about it rather than pretending that I didn’t have it.  (Obviously though, some people prefer being lied to with pleasantries.)  While pretending that I wasn’t diseased would temporarily pacify my emotions, it would also unabatedly spread the disease, potentially to fatality, because I ignored it.  On the other hand, while finding out that you have cancer is quite depressing, you can at least plan according to reality instead of fantasy, and perhaps actually accomplish more with this information, knowing that you have limited opportunity to change your life for the better.

Fortunately again, at the age of twenty-four, I had become a filmmaker, and happened to be editing a film one day for the very producer of the show I had seen as a fourteen year old, ten years earlier, about the moon landing fraud!  “Do you remember that man you had on your show who said the moon landings were fake?” I asked, “What was his name?  I’d like to talk with him.”  The rest is history.

When I ask leading “intellectuals” why they will not even briefly consider just the possibility of a moon landing fraud, they say “No one would do such a thing.”  (That is to say, no one would be that audaciously wicked.)  My argument is that in a world full of genocide, murder, rape, theft, mutilations and molestations, is merely lying about a scientific accomplishment so farfetched?  After all, haven’t Nobel laureates in the past been forced to give back their medals for plagiarism and deceit?  Yes, they have!

I went from being the biggest fan of the moon missions to eventually becoming the most outspoken critic because I was open minded and willing to be wrong when the evidence presented itself to the contrary of my first opinion, even if that evidence was unpredicted, unprecedented and very depressing.  I was not totally brainwashed beyond cure by false criminalistic “patriotism” to the point that I was incapable of deprogramming myself from relentless, from the cradle, deceptive government propaganda.

These type of people who vehemently oppose the admission of a cover-up regarding the Apollo “moon” landings, with endorsements of felony violence to defend and maintain a corruptive status quo, have openly admitted, time and time again, that if firsthand eyewitness Neil Armstrong himself had went on national television and confessed to the cover-up prior to his death, they would still believe that the moon landings were real, when he was there and they were not! Who then is mentally deficient, as they claim the conspiracy theorists are regarding this? These people will not even consider for one second, even the possibility, that the alleged manned moon missions were a cold war deception to inflate the appearance of American military superiority, as well as pacify rampant disgruntled domestic revolt during the Vietnam war, so how can the opinions of such close-minded people be trusted in the first place?  The supposed manned moon missions are a religion to them . . . and a false one at that.  (See  2nd Thessalonians  2: 9-12)

Hitler, the master of deception, said that it was actually easier to get away with a gigantic lie than a small one, because small lies are so common and therefore anticipated, so that no one would expect the audacity of a grand deception.  This is precisely the psychological tactic that was used in precipitating and maintaining the monumental, yet very simple, lie of the manned moon landings, with 1960’s technology.  Again, a feat that cannot even be done today!

Never before in the entire history of the world did such a historical event have absolutely no independent press coverage.  Why do investigators overlook this most telling piece of evidence?  Only three government employee eyewitnesses to the “greatest event in history“?  Whatever completely government controlled and edited photographs and images were given to the press were blindly assumed to be authenticated by the “credible” Nixon administration. It is like giving a whining child cake for dinner to appease them and then expecting them to argue with you demanding broccoli instead!

The Vietnam War during the alleged moon missions was destroying the country from within by its divisiveness and civil protests.  Nixon repeatedly said so himself, thinking that this mounting public discontent might actually lead to real anarchy, rebellion and the disintegration of the government, not to mention his precious egotistical cushy job!  A unifying pep rally of a successful moon landing was just what the American patient needed!  Do you really think that Nixon was going to risk killing three national “heroes” on live” worldwide television during his presidency when simply failing to rescue kidnapped hostages would ruin you for life as it did president Carter a few years later?  How could he absolutely guarantee a successful moon mission? . . . To stage it! . . . Not to mention that it was technologically impossible at the time to begin with.  In fact, according to NASA contractor William Kaysing, who worked for six years on the Apollo program, a classified interdepartmental memo, which he personally read and proofed, estimated the likelihood of a successful manned mission on the first attempt at a mere one in ten thousand chance.

Some assume that if the Soviet Union or Chinese intelligence agencies found out that the American moon landings were fraudulent they would “spill the beans” to the rest of the world.  This is simply not true, and again, thinking only one step farther than programmed to do, reveals the truth.  If wars are created for the profiteering of the “Military Industrial Complex”, as many forward thinking people including president Eisenhower now realize, then “adversaries” of America are merely imaginary, created for profitable ends by the billionaires pulling the strings behind the scenes, who have been making money off of war, “cold” or otherwise, just as Eisenhower warned, since world war one.  (Think about it: America has been at war, nonstop, since the end of world war two, more than seventy years ago!) As such, the Soviet Union and China are, in fact, in-league with the United States government, despite mainstream media appearances. (Just imagine a fake wrestling match.)  This being the case, these overseas entities would not bring the truth of such an American scandal into the light to injure their co-conspirator brother.  Any “bad blood” the United States appears to have with foreign powers is merely staged for the very purpose of keeping their complicity a secret.

Even if these two “super-powers” were actual enemies of America, they still would not expose the truth about the moon missions.  For example, if I had a picture of the president with a prostitute, would it be more profitable for me to give it away free to the press corps, or to blackmail him year after year with ever increasing tolls until the day he died?  If such countries really were enemies of America and had proof of the moon landing fraud, it would serve their interests much more to keep such knowledge to themselves and blackmail America, year after year, administration after administration, to get the behind-the-scenes negotiations to favor them, whether it regarded trade, arms, debt, or anything else they so desired.

There were, in fact, no “independent” tracking stations for the Apollo missions.  The only entities that had such capability were the United State’s own government agencies (who were complicit in the cover-up) and the aforementioned countries, who profited from keeping the secret.  Additionally, NASA launched the “Tetra-A” satellite shortly before the Apollo missions to simulate transmissions coming from the moon so that their ground crews could rehearse the “moon landings” during their many simulations.  Conveniently, it was purported that the Tetra-A satellite “accidentally burned up” in the earth’s atmosphere just before the first moon mission, that way the government satellite could secretly still be in service, performing the same simulation function during the “real” flights.  Furthermore, retired ground crew members recently acknowledged that they could tell no difference whatsoever between a “real” and a “simulated” moon mission.

From Wikipedia regarding The Apollo Fraud:

“Some people insist that the Apollo moon landings were a cold war deception of the Nixon administration.  However, empirical evidence is readily available to show that manned moon landings did occur.  Anyone on earth with an appropriate laser and telescope system can apparently bounce laser beams off three retro-reflector arrays reported to be left on the moon by Apollo 11, 14 and 15, suggesting deployment of the lunar laser ranging equipment at asserted Apollo moon landing sites, implying equipment constructed on earth was transported to the surface of the moon.  In addition, in August 2009, NASA’s lunar reconnaissance orbiter claimed to send back high resolution photos of the estimated Apollo landing sites.  These government issued pictures show not only what is reported to be the faint shadows of the descent stages of the lunar landers allegedly left behind, but also apparent tracks of the astronauts’ walking paths nearby in the lunar dust.”

At first (and only) glance, these appear to be relevant arguments, yet each one is, surprisingly, most easily and unconditionally refuted with only a modicum amount of further investigation beyond initial conditioned interpretation.  First of all, it has recently come to light through “whistling blowing” intelligence employees that “Wikipedia” is a mainstream, establishment supported, parasitical organism used rampantly for propaganda purposes by multiple government agencies such as the NSA, as they can anonymously post intelligent sounding pro-government thesis to the masses, often deliberately contradicting and smugly belittling more truthful “conspiracy theories” of very real crimes of the authorities in power, whose express purpose of these writings is to cover-up and deflect attention away from their own illegal and unholy behavior.  (See the Sleuth Journal article on this topic at the end of this writing.)  When they use words like “empirical evidence is readily available to show that the manned moon landings did occur” . . . It not only shows their arrogance (which, in and of itself, demonstrates their blindness to the facts), it also exemplifies their desperation to make an argument that is so much losing ground that they have to resort to the administration in power tactic that if you don’t agree with them you are somehow deficient in intelligence.

It was proven in 1962 that a laser can be bounced and calibrated off of the moon without a man made reflector thereon simply due to the reflectivity of the lunar surface.  Secondly, Russia put a manmade mirror on the moon’s surface during the time of the Apollo missions for this same claimed purpose, using instead an un-manned probe that would not have to suffer the biological ravages of lethal space radiation.  (See the March 1959 issue, Volume 200, Number 3, of the magazine “Scientific American”, article entitled “Radiation Belts Around the Earth”, to see how deadly and impenetrable space radiation is beyond the safety of low earth orbit where the space station currently resides, at an altitude of merely 205 miles above the earth . . . The moon being about 239,000 miles away.)  Thirdly, seeing how all of these lasers have their data computer controlled, it would only take one computer hacker, if they so desired, to manipulate the data shown on a scientist’s viewing monitor, which they would then wrongly assume to be truthful truth.  (This was precisely the case at “mission control” during the “moon” missions, where dozens of computer “operators”, who actually just read the preprogrammed data screens like news anchors who do not write their own words, openly admitted, after the fact, that they could tell no difference whatsoever between a flight “simulation” and a “real” flight.)

To say that additional “new” photographs from the criminal NASA are evidence that “prove” the moon landings were real is laughable. They already faked high resolution, full body pictures of an “astronaut” standing right on the “moon’s surface” nearly fifty years ago, so what is it to fake additional pictures now, with almost five decades better technology, of such simple things such as tiny shadows or scratches on lunar satellite photographs that are supposed to be from human foot tracks or Apollo lunar landers? These diehard believers are just seeing what they want to see, like a naïve spouse of a cheating partner, accepting the fox’s evidence that they didn’t steal a chicken.

Additional arguments against the fraud are reported to be the hundreds of thousands of people throughout industry who contributed to the missions, who allegedly would have had to have been informed of and kept the secret.  Again, seemingly a good argument, yet it is not with only a little extra thought and investigation.  Do you really think the CIA was stupid enough to tell hundreds of thousands of contractors the goings-on of a top-top-secret project?  Would the CIA really be so careless as to tell the person making the rocket’s door handle, or the glove or the boot of the spacesuit, that they were actually faking the moon landings?  Do we really think the CIA is that stupid to tell so many low level people? Furthermore, to say that because my uncle worked at NASA and believed the moon landings were real, is proof that they were real, is like saying that because my uncle worked as a vender at the Super Bowl and believes that the game was honest, is proof that the football players didn’t cheat to win! How then can this be a genuine argument against the fraud? Surely the government officials making this statement realize this and are deliberately trying to mislead the public away from the truth, like a profiteering shepherd herding their naïve unwitting sheep to the slaughterhouse.

Just like a pyramid of power in any business, what the employee, the manager, and the regional manager knows about the business’ actual agenda, is completely different than what the CEO at the very top knows.  Remember, there were only three people (“trusted” government employees) who were actually there at the time.  As you will see in my film “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon” (the link follows this article), the three crew members were indeed on the rocket, they did launch into earth orbit (to attain realistic “zero gravity” flight photography), they did splash down in the ocean (to add to the realism), yet the rest, everything beyond earth orbit (which is only what they can do today), was completely contrived, like a masterful illusionist, by satellite data manipulation, complete media control, and professional movie sets.  After all, what is easier to do, actually build a rocket and travel to another planet with 1960’s technology on the first attempt without killing anyone, or simply make a movie about it?  The age old argument “The simplest explanation is the true one“, which many “Apollo proponents” use to suggest the missions authenticity, actually proves the fraud instead!  The simple fact is that it is easier to fake a moon mission than to actually do one . . . otherwise there would be manned bases there by now!

Some of the best evidence supporting the fraud is the fact that in 1998, when the space shuttle flew to its highest altitude ever, three hundred sixty-five miles, one third higher than they normally flew, they were asked to descend to a lower altitude by mission control due to lethal space radiation they encountered by approaching too close to the “Van Allen Radiation Belts”, which don’t even begin until one thousand miles altitude (and continue for an additional twenty-five thousand miles).  That is to say, they were six hundred thirty-five miles away from radiation that was so intense that they reported they could see the radiation with their eyes closed as sparks of light hitting the retinas of their shaded eyes. When this happened, CNN inadvertently reported this fact by saying, “The radiation belt surrounding earth is more dangerous than previously believed.” Apparently not a single journalist on the entire planet figured out, except for myself, that this statement totally contradicts the authenticity of the moon landings!  Here’s why:

The only time in world history human beings are said to have traveled through the twenty-five thousand mile thick radiation field called the “Van Allen Radiation Belts”, which unbeknownst to most surrounds earth starting at an altitude of one thousand miles and extends twenty-five thousand miles beyond that, is during the alleged moon missions.  Why is it then that astronauts some six hundred thirty-five miles away from this radiation, twenty-nine years later, know more about the radiation than the Apollo astronauts who claimed they were in the middle of it eighteen times to the moon and back?

Remember, the recent discovery proves that the radiation is . . . “more dangerous than previously believed”.  What is “previously believed” if not based on the previous reports from the “experts” of the radiation, the Apollo crews, who were allegedly the only ones in all of world history to have ever traveled through the radiation (and eighteen times at that, to the moon and back), all with no ill effects and no reports of any kind of the visible sparks of radiation being seen, as were later reported by the space shuttle crew from hundreds of miles away, not even in the middle of it as the Apollo crews supposedly were!  Again, how can people six hundred thirty-five miles away from radiation they have never traveled through or even to, know more about it than people who were allegedly in the middle of it eighteen times?!

Of course, this is simply not possible.

What does this mean?  It means that the people who claimed to have previously been inside the radiation field lied about being there!  Of course too, if the “Apollo” crews never went through the Van Allen Radiation Belt as this contradictory report reveals, then they certainly could not have gone to the moon either, which the traversing of this radiation would require!  Why does no one connect the dots with this very revealing information except me Because the dots lead to a horrific truth that would break the spirit of the entire American nation if they knew, proving that most people would rather believe a pleasurable lie, than a painful truth.

In December of 2014, NASA sent their brand new “Orion” spacecraft, unmanned, directly into the Van Allen Radiation Belt, at a 3,600 mile altitude, and then u-turned it for a prompt return to earth. What was the purpose of the Orion mission? Officially, “to test the instruments”. What “instruments” were onboard the Orion spacecraft? GEIGER COUNTERS TO MEASURE THE RADIATION INSIDE OF THE RADIATION BELTS. Didn’t NASA already have these measurements decades ago from the Apollo moon missions, if indeed men actually went through the radiation belts 18 times? Why is it so important to “test the instruments” at a 3,600 mile altitude inside of the radiation belts?  To see if humans can survive transversing it . . . for the very first time!

Apparently today’s new generation of NASA engineers, some in their twenty’s, have stumbled upon this significant NASA contradiction. Though they were probably led into the space exploration field by the motivation of the seemingly glorious inaugural moon mission of the 1960’s, the fact that such a feat cannot be duplicated even today with five decades more advanced technology, and that aside from theses alleged moon missions of the Nixon administration no one has ever gone more than 400 miles away from the earth in the nearly fifty years since then, these unfavorable truths are apparently slowly, yet surely, boiling to the surface of their disgruntled reality soup.

Kelly Smith, one of these twentyish engineers, was selected as the official Orion mission’s spokesperson in the following NASA video press release. Notice that at :43 seconds into the film, Smith confirms that the radiation belts are made up of “Extreme Radiation”. At time 3:06 he again refers to the belts as “Dangerous Radiation”. Finally at time 3:36, for the third time, Smith plainly states, “We must solves these (radiation) challenges before we send people through this region of space.”

You can view the short NASA film by clicking HERE

The question is, if the solution to the dangerous radiation belt problem has yet to be invented (“We must solves these challenges before we send people through this region of space.”), then how is it that the Apollo crews during their alleged moon missions went through this dangerous and extreme radiation nearly fifty years ago when the necessary equipment to survive doing so has yet to be invented ? (“We must solves these challenges before we send people through this region of space.”)

Did Kelly Smith reveal this contradiction accidentally or intentionally ?

When I asked NASA’s press office to interview Kelly Smith about this matter, they refused to grant him permission to talk with me. When I emailed a list of mostly harmless questions about the Orion mission, NASA politely answered all of them. When I submitted a more difficult inquiry about Kelly Smith’s three statements about the dangerous radiation of the Van Allen Belts and how the radiation problem must be solved before NASA sends astronauts through them, NASA refused to reply to these questions, as if I had never asked them. When I asked for the readings of the Orion spacecraft’s onboard Geiger Counters in REM, NASA said that such information was a secret and that I would have to file a “Freedom of Information Act” request to attain the measurements, which I have since done and am awaiting their reply. When I asked why such information about the radiation belts strength in REM is a secret, NASA refused to answer and then terminated all further communication with me.  (Just 1 REM per hour is five times a lethal dose, and as you will read below, the Radiation Belts contain up to 100 REM per hour.)

When NASA sent publicly funded probes and spacecraft to measure the temperature of the sun and the amount of hydrogen in Jupiter’s atmosphere, this information was readily available to scientists and to the public, after all, why would a measurement of a part of nature be a secret? Likewise, the amount radiation in REM in the Van Allen Radiation Belts which surround the earth is simply a part of nature and, as such, there is no reason whatsoever why such elementary measurements of nature should be a government secret . . . unless disclosing such measurements would reveal the impossibility of the Apollo crews having gone through them and surviving with decades older technology, seeing how NASA just acknowledged, accidentally or otherwise, that such protection from this “Dangerous” and “Extreme” radiation has yet to be invented by the space agency and “must” be invented “before we send people through this region of space.”

Quite interesting, yes ?

When I discovered absolute proof (actual, on camera evidence) that the Apollo astronauts never left earth orbit (contained in a newly discovered unedited NASA reel which was never broadcast to the public; debuted in “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon) and showed this controversial videotape to a news director at NBC, he turned pale white, practically fainted as he collapsed in his chair and exclaimed, “Oh, my God!  It looks like we didn’t go to the moon!”  “I know”, I said, “What do we do?”  This man, who held the betterment of America in his hand, thought for a long while . . . and then eventually “chickened out”.  He said, “I cannot broadcast this with a clear conscious.  It will cause a civil war.  I will not be the one responsible for that.”  While I disagree that the public knowing the truth about the moon missions would cause a civil war, they would probably demand governmental reform and start investigating other matters of corruption and deception.  Naturally, criminals would rather not get caught and preserve their way of life that reform would inevitably dismantle.

Oddly enough, when Bush Jr. was president, he went on national television and proclaimed that “The United States will return to the moon as a logical first step to Mars and beyond”.  Did no one besides me notice that if they really already went to the moon six times, why would they need to do a “first” step over again for the seventh time?  He was even so bold as to go on to say that “First we will need to learn how to protect the astronauts from lethal space radiation.”  Am I the only one curious enough to ask, “Why not do it the same way that worked so good the first time they went to the moon?

In August of 2009 it was reported, albeit as a news oddity (and it certainly was) that a “moon rock” personally given to the president of the Netherlands by Neil Armstrong in 1969, who supposedly hand picked it off of the “moon’s” surface himself, was opened forty years later from its hermetically sealed container by a curious museum curator after he had watched “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon”.  Following microscopic examination, the rock was verified to actually be a deceptively authentic looking piece of petrified wood instead!  Yet again, not a single journalist, except for myself, asked the question, “If the moon rocks are fraudulent, what about the moon missions?

If more people would only view with an open, deprogrammed mind, “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon”, which contains newly discovered video evidence of the moon landing fraud, they would see with their own eyes recently uncovered unedited behind-the-scenes outtakes of false photography of the “moon missions”. The scene contained therein has never been broadcast to the public. In it, Neil Armstrong is using a one foot diameter model of the earth, from low earth orbit, to create the illusion for the television viewers, that he and his crew are half way to the moon, when they are, in fact, still in earth orbit.  This is absolute proof that, though they were on the rocket in low earth orbit, the crew never went any further due to lethal space radiation.

This footage is even dated by NASA’s own computer clock as having taken place two days into Armstrong’s flight, when he is supposed to be half way to the moon, or some 135,000 miles away from the earth, yet he and his crew are clearly shown (in these newly discovered unedited outtakes of the broadcast) to still be in earth orbit, and are instead, falsifying the television photography to deceive the viewing public of their real location.  The CIA is even heard on a private, third audio channel, prompting Armstrong to respond to Mission Control’s questions only after four seconds have elapsed, in order to create the false impression of an increased radio delay, so as to appear much farther from the earth than he and his crew actually were.  Jump ahead to time  32:02 – 40:50 in “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon if you do not wish to view the entire forty seven minute documentary and only see the newly discovered unedited out-takes of Neil Armstrong falsifying mission photography during the historic and now infamous mission.

Now a word from our sponsor, then the article will conclude.  Please check it out by clicking on it to send me some revenue, free of charge to you!  Thank You!


Recently, a website detractor to the obviousness of this fraud shown in the newly discovered footage debuted in my film, suggested that because I only showed excerpts of this condemning footage in the documentary, that I somehow tricked people into thinking that the clearly heard third track of CIA audio and the blatantness of the one foot diameter sized mocked-up model of the earth, was something other than a deliberate lie. Seeing how my program is only forty-five minutes long and the unedited falsified footage reel is an hour in length, I deemed it quite logical and appropriate to show, in the most timely manner possible, the segments of the fraudulent video which displayed the most apparent falsification, editing from one such clip to the other.  According to this misleading and false accusatory thinking, showing only the highlights of a football game negates the winning team’s victory.  As such, the one making this baseless accusation is the one guilty of deceiving his audience.
If the moon landings, which were done with such ease on the first attempt with 1960’s technology, though they cannot be duplicated toady with nearly fifty years more advanced technology, are so obviously real, then anyone who says otherwise is an idiot. Why then are there hundreds of websites, with tens of thousands of hours spent on their construction, in existence to refute the insane rantings of morons? As Shakespeare so famously said, “Thou does protest too much.” Another historical commentator said this, “The likelihood of one individual being right, increases in direct proportion to the intensity with which others are trying to prove him wrong.

Even former president Clinton, once holding the (allegedly) highest office in the land, doubts the authenticity of the moon landings.  On Page 156 of his biography “My Life” he states:

Just a month before, Apollo 11 astronauts Buzz Aldrin and Neil Armstrong had left their colleague, Michael Collins, aboard spaceship Columbia and ‘walked on the moon’, beating by five months President Kennedy’s goal of putting a man on the moon before the decade was out. The old carpenter asked me if I really believed it happened.  I said sure, I saw it on television. He disagreed; he said that he didn’t believe it for a minute, that ‘them television fellers’ could make things look real that weren’t. Back then, I thought he was a crank. During my eight years in Washington, I saw some things on TV that made me wonder if he wasn’t ahead of his time.”

If a president of the United States is finally admitting his doubts as to the authenticity of the “moon landings” (albeit, after he safely left office) and is calling those who perceive the truth of the event “ahead of their time”, shouldn’t you also reconsider your thinking on the matter, if you haven’t already?

Not too long ago, I interviewed the second man to not walk on the moon, Edwin “Buzz” Aldrin. He sat down with me thinking that I was going to interview him in order to help him make money off of a book he was promoting. Instead, I had a television monitor set up to ask him about my newly discovered unedited outtakes of false photography from his “moon” mission, in which he was actually the camera operator orchestrating the deception.

You have to understand, at that moment, with two professional television cameras there, a crew of about five people, as well as professional lights and microphones, he thought for a brief moment, that the news story of his fraud had just broken worldwide. It was at this time that he exclaimed in anger (at time 8:58 – 9:11 in the link below), “And this makes you a real famous person that has discovered this and reveals all this stuff! What an ego you must have to want to propel yourself (your career) like this!” He even shouted back (at time 8:30 – 8:38), “Well you’re talking to the wrong guy! Why don’t you talk to the administrator of NASA! We’re (only) passengers! We’re guys going on a flight!” (See these time specified clips here in Astronauts Gone Wild)

The question is, if I was wrong with my accusation, how could I become famous from exposing nothing? (It wasn’t until the following year that he punched me on national television for my persistence in the matter.) Therefore, this statement itself is a blatant admission of guilt, because he didn’t say I was wrong with my assertion, rather that I had impure motives for revealing the truth. Additionally, if he was only a “passenger” as he plainly stated, then that certainly means that he never piloted the lunar module to the moon’s surface as he previous claimed, because a passenger and a pilot are certainly very different from one another! (Merely orbiting the earth for eight days, entirely under the control of NASA, is what made him only a passenger, not a pilot, as he firmly admitted, also asserting that he did no trickery beyond this point in the mission, blaming the rest of the deception on NASA instead, which is another admission of the fraud.)

Aldrin finally remembered that I was not with “ABC” (news) as he previously believed, rather “ABC-Digital”, the name of my independent television production company at the time. At this point, when he realized that the discovery of the fraud was isolated, by a lone television producer, not to be broadcast worldwide by a major television network, he started backpedaling on his admission of guilt and started to reassert, though not very convincingly, his mission’s alleged authenticity. When he finally realized that he had made a critical error in judgment by acknowledging twice, with the above two statements, that I was right in regard to my revelation of the truth, he demanded that the cameras be turned off and threatened to sue me if I showed his admission of guilt to anyone. (See this at time 10:10 – 10:18 in Astronauts Gone Wild) Certainly if these two statements were not an admission of guilt, he would have no problem releasing them to the public.

A few years later, when the economy took a nosedive and the majority of my private video clients stopped spending revenue on television commercials and corporate ad campaigns (which was about 90% of my business), I drove a taxicab on weekends to make extra money. For those on the internet who denounce me, therefore, as “not a professional filmmaker” because I once drove a taxi for extra money, only shows the desperateness of their argument, that is so much turning into quicksand, that they must insult the messenger instead of the message, because the accuracy and weight of the message itself is too much for them to bear or argue against. One only has to look at my bio at the end of this article, and the Youtube link therein of samples of my numerous for hire films over the past three decades, to know that I had been paying my bills as a professional filmmaker for over thirty years, producing dozens of television programs with budgets up to a million dollars, and have personally owned about $100,000 worth of camera production and editing equipment. I think what these unskilled detractors are really saying, is that someone who used to drive a yellow car for two days a week couldn’t possibly discern the truth. Can the mind of someone making such a juvenile argument be trusted in the first place to discern a crime which is so intricately deceptive?

On four separate occasions, as the apparent leading “expert” on the moon landing fraud, I have been asked to participate in television specials discussing the moon landing hoax “theory”, although the point of these programs was really to denounce such boat rockers of the status quo. When my arguments and newly discovered video evidence were too well presented in each of these four programs, sometimes after considerable expense on their part to pay me a fee for my expertise, as well as air travel and accommodations, they deliberately deleted my interview from their program, or changed their mind altogether from interviewing me in the first place, after I too clearly proved to them beforehand that the moon landings were, in fact, fraudulent. The four programs I speak of were for the BBC, Discovery Channel, Myth Busters, and the National Geographic Channel.

This last one, the “National Geographic Channel”, even removed their entire program on this subject from Youtube after I gave numerous national interviews following their television “special”, which were broadcast elsewhere, about their exclusion from their program of my interview and the undeniable new video evidence I had to offer, additionally denouncing their episode’s peculiar deception in order to make their false assertions. Their blatant misleading methodology that they used in a failed attempt to “prove me wrong” and discredit my expertise as a filmmaker of three decades, was to the nature of scenes lit with natural sunlight (as claimed by NASA for the “moonscapes”), as opposed to those which were filmed inside a television studio with electrical light. (See time 24:20 – 25:33 in A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon)

Seeing how my job as a filmmaker of thirty years is to make fake scenes look real, this truly is my expertise, and how I first discerned that the moon missions were false. In fact, years ago, in showing a colleague of mine, with more years professional filmmaking experience than I, a recent unrelated film I had just completed, he complimented, “I really liked the way you captured the sunset at the end of your movie.” I smiled and said, “That was actually an electrical light, not the sun.”

In the case of the NASA scenes that were allegedly lit solely with the bright sunlight on the atmosphereless environment of the moon, the shadows from one object or person, compared to another, should always, without exception, run parallel with one another and never intersect. Yet, in several of the photographs allegedly taken on the moon, shadows from one object or person run at a different angel than the other and eventually intersect. This would absolutely never happen in sunlight, as the sun, the alleged only light source in the “moon” pictures, is one million times bigger in volume than the Earth, and therefore evenly lights in the exact same direction of any given area.

If, on the other hand, there is more than one light source such as multiple electrical lights, or if a powerful single electrical light used to simulate the sun is close to the subjects, then varying shadow directions will appear, because one person or object is on one side of the light and the other person or object is on the other side of the light, which casts shadows in different directions. This would be impossible to occur in natural sunlight due to the enormous size of the sun, relative to a much smaller electrical light. Don’t believe me? Just go outside on the next sunny, cloudless day and stand about three feet apart from another person, or ten feet apart. You will see that your two shadows will always run parallel with one another and never intersect. Why is it then that the shadows from the “Apollo” photographs intersect on several occasions? Because they are using electrical lighting, not sunlight! IT IS THAT SIMPLE!

According to NASA, no electrical lighting whatsoever was used on any of the “moon” missions, simply because of allegedly being on a heavenly body in very bright sunlight, that didn’t have clouds or atmosphere, made supplemental lighting completely unnecessary and a waste of precious electrical power. In fact, according to NASA, because the moon has no atmosphere, the sunlight there is twenty times brighter than on the Earth, so the last thing any photographer on the moon would need is an electrical light that would cast intersecting shadows!

In the now infamous National Geographic special on how the moon landing hoax was supposed to not be a hoax at all, in a vain attempt to still hold on to the corporate lie (which they subsequently removed from Youtube because I exposed the following blatant deception of theirs), they went to a California desert at night to “simulate” the alleged conditions on the moon. They dressed up an actor in an “astronaut” costume, had them stand a few feet apart from a television crewmember, brought in one electrical light to simulate the sun, and basically said, “See! The shadows of the two people standing near one another DO intersect in our ‘moon simulation’, so filmmaker Bart Sibrel is wrong!”

The very simple fact is this: Why didn’t they just wait 12 hours and use the very same desert during the day with REAL sunlight to accurately depict the very same real sunlit condition on the moon?!?! They claimed, “We can’t duplicate the sun”, yet they easily could have if they only filmed in the very same spot 12 hours earlier, in natural sunlight! They went on national television trying to prove “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon” wrong with the exact same technique that PROVES ME RIGHT . . . all the while telling everyone the exact opposite!

The point is, their shadows in their little demonstration intersected because their “moon simulation” was lit with electrical light! . . . All the while they claimed that this proved that the moon missions were real, when their very demonstration proved that the moon missions were FAKE instead! Think about it! In their “moon demonstration”, with electrical light, the shadows did intersect, right? Yet, they said, “These results directly contradict the conspiracy claims” (which are that the pictures from NASA on “the moon” were lit with electrical light, not sunlight). They told this blatant lie in a deceptive attempt to confuse the viewer from seeing the truth, when in fact, these very results of theirs PROVED the conspiracy claims to be TRUE rather than false! Do you see this?!?! They went to the desert at night, allegedly, to get a black background like on the moon, yet this was not the point of the experiment! The point of the experiment was to see which of the two casts parallel shadows: SUNLIGHT (as claimed by NASA) or ELECTRICAL LIGHT (as claimed by me), because the assertion I made in my film was that the reason the shadows intersect in some of the NASA pictures is because they were lit with electrical light in a television studio instead of sunlight outside on the moon as they falsely claimed, where the shadows would NEVER intersect!

Did you get this?

I just discovered a VHS copy I made of their one time broadcast (later pulled from Youtube) and uploaded this devious attempt of theirs to lie through their teeth to the viewer. Here it is:

National Geographic’s Self-Condemning Lies

The National Geographic Channel simulated the “Apollo” pictures (matched them) by using ELECTRICAL LIGHT NOT SUNLIGHT, which means that the Apollo pictures were taken with electrical light, not sunlight, meaning they were taken on Earth! . . . All the while they tried to mislead the audience into believing the exact opposite of the truth, that this deceptive “evidence” of theirs proved the moon mission’s authenticity, when in fact this exact evidence proved the exact opposite, that the NASA pictures were also taken with electrical light, therefore, they were taken on Earth! “Myth Busters” did the very same thing, simulating (matching exactly) the “Apollo” picture’s intersecting shadows with electrical light, proving that the reason why the NASA pictures have intersecting shadows in them is because they too were lit with electrical light, not sunlight, meaning the pictures were taken on Earth, all the while they LIED to the viewer, saying that this very evidence which proved the fraud, instead proved the mission’s authenticity! . . . Absolutely unbelievable and devilishly evil !!!

It was when I pointed out these deceptions of theirs in all four of the programs, that the producers of them (who were corporate NASA surrogates) refused to have me on their shows, or deleted my previously recorded interviews from their content, because not only could I prove on national television that the moon landings were fraudulent beyond any doubt, I would have also exposed their blatantly deceptive arguments to make their misleading points on national television, something they were not about to allow me to do.

Think about it! If a television program about the moon landing deception (really produced to reassure the public that it was not a deception against mounting evidence to the contrary) refuses to have on their show the world’s leading “expert” on this very subject, or deliberately deletes conclusive evidence from him of the fraud from their content, how can they at all be trusted to be presenting the truth in the first place? If the moon landings were so obviously real, then they would let me speak my mind uncensored, and show my newly discovered video evidence unedited, without any fear whatsoever! This goes to show you that these television “specials” were not at all interested in discovering the actual truth, rather they were affiliated crony agents of the government which were instructed to douse the emerging truth that the United States’ spy agencies lied to all of their citizens (and to the entire world) regarding the authenticity of the moon landings! If this were not true, they would have no problem having me and my newly discovered evidence on their programs!

The National Geographic program further lied in their “special” when they said “only a very small group of people believe that the moon missions were fraudulent”. Really??? Is 45 million of 300 million Americans a “very small group” ??? (Not to mention nearly 2 BILLION others in non-brainwashed countries that know the facts!) If the group of believers of the truth is so “very small” as they falsely claimed, then what is the National Geographic Channel (a propaganda arm of the United States government) doing wasting an entire exclusive hour of television, and tens of thousands of dollars in production costs, trying to convince such a “small minority” out of their “crazy” and “insignificant” error, or are these extensive resources being spent because of the growing millions awaking to their senses, that networks like these are trying to keep the multitudes at bay?

Their own “expert” on the program as to the moon landings alleged authenticity, the one of such astuteness that he proved me right when he was trying to prove me wrong, admitted that his life’s work is to convince people that the moon missions were real. Why would this be anyone’s life’s work if the “moon landings” were unquestionably real, the numbers apposed to him were so “very small”, and the people opposed to his belief were merely “crazy” as the program insinuated? Would you spend your entire life’s energy trying to convince insane people who thought the world was flat that it was round?! Of course not! You would, however, spend enormous amounts of energy and money trying to keep the status quo, if the prevalent university teaching was that the world was flat, even though it was not, and call anyone saying otherwise a “heretic”, as was plainly proven by history in this matter, and as its obviously repeating itself now in this issue as well.

Even the scene at time 30:37 – 31:06 in A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon, in which the astronauts appear to be “floating” around in 1/6th gravity, is so obviously a simple, yet very convincing, “slow motion” effect, that in the National Geographic program they deliberately “zoomed in” far past the soles of the astronaut’s feet touching the ground in the original NASA footage, in a blatant attempt to alter the original evidence, because showing the unaltered clip of the bottoms of their feet only getting an inch or two off of the ground, would have conclusively proved that they were on Earth and not on the moon, where they should have been able to leap a yard or more high because of the much lighter gravity! When you simply double the speed of the footage with professional video equipment that I regularly work with, it becomes blatantly obvious that the convincing “1’6th gravity floating effect” is nothing more than a rudimentary “slow motion” effect. Truly, this ALONE proves that they are NOT on the moon, rather on Earth!

Do you have eyes that perceive . . .

or only see what the magician wants you to see?

NBC, for a program on their “Discovery Channel”, paid me thousands of dollars, flew me to New York City, put me up in the very expensive Waldorf Astoria hotel, all because a new, independent-minded, producer of theirs wanted to air my side of the story, as well as exclusively showcase the first network broadcast of my newly discovered unedited video evidence of behind-the-scenes photographic fraud from the “Apollo 11” mission. When NASA got wind of their intended broadcast of this condemning footage, they threatened NBC with permanently disconnecting their “live” camera from the International Space Station, if they dared broadcast these excerpts of blatant false photography from the first “moon mission”. (Remember, another NBC news director previously viewed the very same evidence and promptly concluded that it conclusively proved the moon landing fraud, though disappointedly saying, “I cannot air this. It will cause a civil war”.)

Seeing how the Discovery Channel and NBC regularly used and boasted about video feeds from this camera of theirs on the International Space Station on numerous television programs, they succumbed to the NASA threat, and never aired the interview of me painstakingly explaining my newly discovered condemning NASA footage, which they had already filmed and purchased exclusive rights to, even though it cost them tens of thousands of dollars in losses to do so.

Do you still believe there is a free press outside of government control?

World famous Watergate reporter Carl Bernstein has extensively documented the connection between the CIA and American “journalists”:

More than 400 American ‘journalists’ (that we know of) have secretly carried out assignments for the Central Intelligence Agency, according to documents on file at CIA headquarters. In many instances, CIA documents show that ‘journalists’ were contracted to perform covert missions for the CIA with the consent of the managers of America’s leading news organizations. Among the executives (that we know of) who lent their cooperation to the CIA, were the heads of Time Magazine, Newsweek, the New York Times, ABC, NBC, CBS, the Associate Press, United Press International, and Reuters.

I think that just about covers everybody.

I was even once invited to the NASA launch headquarters in Florida as an official member of the press, with personalized press credentials, a formal written invitation, and a scheduled appointment, yet when I asked an “Apollo” astronaut to confirm that he actually left Earth orbit, because I had newly discovered evidence to the contrary, I was promptly, and forcibly, removed from the property by security forces, with the threat of arrest if I persisted with my questions. If you had been there and witnessed this firsthand as I and my camera crew did, you would have sworn that we were in North Korea or the Soviet Union, rather than the “free” United States of America.

Now you know why every nation on Earth, except our own, refers to our country as “A Police State”, and why growing thousands of people every year, prominent professionals, are mournfully renouncing their US citizenship at great financial and personal expense.

Not too long ago, I was pulled over for merely having a burned out light bulb on my car, and was separately interrogated for about a half an hour, apart from an “unprofiled” African American passenger of mine, as if we were suspected of smuggling tons of drugs across the Columbian border. Is this the individual liberty our Founding Fathers died for?

In my duties as a journalist, I was once meeting with a leading presidential candidate, yet when I asked them if they would pledge to looking into the authenticity of the moon landings if they were elected, I was told by the secret service that I was not allowed to ask them any questions. What kind of a country is it whose security forces forbid the press from asking someone running for president a question?!?! The U.S.A. or the U.S.S.R. ?!?!

Does anyone care what has happened to our country???

Can’t you see why a government acting in such a totalitarian manner would indeed be arrogant and brazen enough to fake the moon landings?!?!

The only television program to ever broadcast the condemning footage I uncovered of unedited outtakes of false photography from the first “moon” mission, “Apollo 11”, was Tech TV’s enormously successful talk show “Unscrewed”. In fact, the show was so popular, that their viewership doubled every 30 days for the first 2 years it was on the air! Despite being the highest rated program on the entire network, bringing in the owners of the channel millions of dollars, the show was abruptly canceled after airing the inflammatory footage of mine without prior network approval, as a not so subtle warning to other broadcasters who might make the same error in judgment. Since then, knowing this penalty of termination hanging over their heads, no other network has dared to air, on any of their programs, this monumental newly discovered unedited footage of NASA outtakes, which emphatically proves that the moon missions were false. It also goes to show you, that whoever owns these networks, the control of too revealing of information is much more important to them than millions of dollars. Obviously then, the only people to whom millions of dollars are meaningless, are Billionaires, who are notoriously in bed with their brethren in government. Now you know how the term “embedded journalists”, for members of the press being “chaperoned” by the government to only see what is preselected and prescreened, was coined!

Watch the clip of this daring, yet apparently foolish, program in the link below, the only ones to ever broadcast this inflammatory NASA footage . . . right before being cancelled. When their own studio audience was shown the newly discovered unedited “behind-the scenes” outtakes of NASA footage, which proves the moon landing fraud beyond any doubt, their in-house viewers gasped in horror at the astounding clarity and blatantness of the fraud. Once the government saw the revelatory reaction of the public in this first and only broadcast of this condemning footage from “Apollo 11”, they knew that they must do everything possible to not let it be broadcast ever again. The threat of termination, as exemplified by the immediate cancelation of this number one rated program on the entire network, right after airing this damning footage of the moon landing fraud, still holds a Sword of Damocles of fear over the heads of any future risk taking television producers.

I guess most people love their jobs more than their country.

Bart Sibrel Debuts NASA False Photography Nationwide

I have worked with several other seemingly well-meaning producers, who also created programs suggesting a NASA moon landing deception, yet ALL OF THEM later succumbed to the fear of termination if they aired the one piece of evidence that would prove the fraud beyond any doubt in the very program that was supposed to be about the moon landing fraud, deleting at the last hour the one piece of evidence that would finally settle the matter, forfeiting out of fear, the “exclusive” of all “exclusives”.

Poor Geraldo Rivera, whom I also met with privately while I was in New York at the Waldorf Astoria hotel, who received from me personally the condemning unedited NASA footage well in advance of my on air interview with him, finally mustered the courage to have me on his program, deciding to wait until the “40th Anniversary Special” of the “moon” missions, yet he too was apparently informed by his network superiors, that he was forbidden to broadcast the single piece of evidence that conclusively proved the moon landing fraud. Instead of seizing the opportunity to break the biggest “scoop” of the century, on the perfect program, at the perfect time to do so, he instead chose to sensationalize the circumstances, by broadcasting me being punched or kicked by “Apollo” astronauts when I confronted them with the truth, rather than broadcasting the clear evidence of truth for which I was violently opposed.

The fact is, I was informed privately that Geraldo himself questions he authenticity of the moon missions, yet can not publicly say so as a representative of the “mainstream” media . . . if he wants to keep his high paying job . . . which apparently he does. This just goes to show you that leading “journalists” that are supposed to be a safeguard for their fellow countrymen against a tyrannical government, are more interested in pleasing their corrupt governmental overlords than doing their duty of justice to their fellow citizens.

Bart Sibrel on Geraldo

The simple truth is, if I really walked on the moon with indisputable evidence, and someone thought otherwise, I would find that hysterically funny! If someone asked me to swear on the Bible to that “fact”, why in the world would I object to taking an oath of such on camera for the permanent record? Instead, the astronauts in question reacted to the request as if I walked up to them in the company of their wife and asked them how their hidden mistress was doing! If they really walked on the moon, me saying otherwise would be like throwing a feather at them! Why would anyone be violently mad at someone for throwing a feather at them? If, on the other hand, I were exposing a real crime of infidelity that they had gotten away with for decades and built lifelong reputations on, then you could certainly see why they would react with such violent hatred. (See time 00:00 – 2:00 in Astronauts Gone Wild)

Four networks, so far, have paid thousands of dollars for the exclusive license to broadcast this newly discovered amazing NASA footage, only to be told at the eleventh hour NOT TO DO IT by senior network executives (who are likely under the direct influence of the United States government, whose criminality would be exposed by airing it). The BBC did this very thing only three days before its scheduled broadcast, after they had licensed the condemning footage nearly a year in advance at the cost of thousands of dollars! I was informed that a very senior US government official telephoned the president of the BBC and put pressure on them not to air the program. The BBC even bribed the executive producer of my film with additional thousands of dollars to sign a contract not to publicize their recanting and the reason for it. If this person, who wishes to remain anonymous, wasn’t so money hungry, we would have included this fact of the BBC’s blackmail by the US government in later releases of the film, its sequel “Astronauts Gone Wild”. As I never signed the nondisclosure agreement, I can now tell you this backstory.

In fact, this “anonymous” executive producer of which I spoke, who put up approximately a million dollars to help produces these two films of mine exposing the moon landing fraud, has an IQ nearing 200, and is now a board member of an aerospace company which is presently building rockets for NASA! Wouldn’t such a person know whether the moon landings were real or not??? Of course they would! THEY DO KNOW! They KNOW that they were FAKE, a Cold War bluff against the Soviet Union, as well as a domestic “pep rally” for the Nixon administration during the Vietnam War’s detrimental national protests. They KNOW, from an engineering standpoint, that the 1960’s NASA “low bidder” equipment that only put a man in orbit for the first time a few years earlier, could NEVER have successfully landed on the moon on their first attempt with 1960’s technology, especially considering the fact that the feat cannot be repeated today with five decades of more advanced technology.

Furthermore, once “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon” had achieved 100,000 views on my Youtube channel, Youtube removed it claiming “copyright infringement! Hello! I’m the copyright holder!!!!!! It took repeated legal maneuvers to successfully upload it again.

Amazon, until only very recently, after arguing with them nearly endlessly, wouldn’t allow me to sell my own movie on their website, because when “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon initially debuted on Amazon in 2001, it was their number one selling DVD, even outselling the newly released academy award winning film “Gladiator!Copyright infringement”, once again, of my own movie that I am the copyright holder of, was the reason given for me being unable to sell my own film once it became too popular and too many people were hearing the truth! Youtube and Amazon are only two of many examples of attempts to blockade my truth telling documentary from the public’s eyes and ears, for fear that the truth would cause the collapse of the corrupt government that perpetrated the crime in the first place. As the narrator says at the end of my film, “Even if the government’s destruction would come from the truth, then it is not worthy to stand, and its betterment would inevitably follow.”

I am often criticized by my fellow countrymen as “unpatriotic” for saying that the “glorious” American “moon landings” were a Cold War deception, even though this is the sad, unwanted truth. Our country has hopelessly descended into a realm where liars are heroes, and truth speakers are traitors. If George Washington arose from his grave today, he would grab the first ship back to England. He repeatedly told the painstakingly detailed truth of the desperateness of the situation of his Continental Army against the vastly outnumbered and better equipped British troops, to a congress, that even at that early historic hour, wanted to hear flowery lies of success instead of unpleasant realities. Our leaders have gone from “I can never tell a lie”, to practically lying all of the time. It is not unpatriotic to expose corruption, it is unpatriotic to commit the corruption in the first place.

USA Toady, along with many other newspapers, television and radio stations, “reviewed” my documentary “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon”, basically toting the party line, saying things like “ludicrous” to describe it. Really? Four out of five people who actually watch the 45 minute documentary, with the condemning new evidence debuted in it, reverse their opinion as to the “moon missions” authenticity!!! In fact, in each and every case, when I tracked down the actual person who wrote the critical review and asked them, “What did you think about the newly discovered unedited footage of false photography from Apollo 11 showcased in my movie?”, they replied, “Well . . . I didn’t actually watch the movie. I wrote the review on the concept of the film, not the actual content.”

Can you believe this?!?! “Professional” “journalists”, for major magazines and broadcast television stations, write reviews about films that they don’t even watch?!?! Why aren’t people like this fired for incompetence or dereliction of duty, instead of being promoted to positions of national authority??? This is what is “ludicrous”, along with the idea that a scientific achievement that was done on its first attempt in the 1960’s with technology that is fifty years old cannot be duplicated today!!!

Although the technology allegedly used to “put a man on the moon” was not classified, because the missions were “supposed” to have been done by a nonmilitary “civilian” government agency (NASA), the specific details of the hypothetically miraculous machinery, according to NASA, are nevertheless “unavailable”. This is because all of the flight telemetry data, as well as all of the technical specifications of the “Apollo” spacecraft, were deliberately destroyed by NASA after the “moon” missions! You would think that such important, one of a kind, and supremely valuable information, would be kept for just short of all eternity, in case such expensive to attain information would be needed again in the future, yet the exact opposite is the case.

How did the lunar lander power air-conditioning against an outside temperature of 252 degrees Fahrenheit down to an amazing 72 degrees inside for three days nonstop with a bank of essentially car batteries? No one will ever know! All of the schematics and electrical diagrams of the lunar lander were destroyed! How did the “moon” rocket go 1000 times farther than the space shuttle with less advanced engines? No one will ever know! The rocket diagrams and blueprints were removed from the archives and are nowhere to be found! All of this was done so that if a curious and astute propulsion or electrical engineering student in the future were to do the actual mathematical calculations, they would not be able to expose the fact that the “moon” vehicle, in reality, did not have the electrical battery capacity necessary to power the air-conditioning down 180 degrees from the outside temperature nonstop for three days, nor did it have the fuel necessary to leave Earth orbit to begin with, as the newly uncovered video evidence clearly proves by the crew’s falsification of being half way to the moon!

Don’t believe me? Watch the video clip below in which I read the super intelligent “Apollo” rocket designer’s original mathematical calculations to “Apollo” astronaut Eugene Cernan as to the only way possible to reach the moon, a methodology which NASA never used.

When the government told the man in charge of the “moon” rocket to adjust his numbers “a little bit” to reflect a fictitious way to reach the moon with the available resources and technology of the time, he immediately recanted on his fuel calculations by a factor of more than 32,000 percent! Did I mention that this man in charge of the “Apollo” program’s authenticity, Wernher von Braun, was a former World War Two Nazi whom our own government’s State Department is on the record for saying that, had he not prematurely died shortly after the “Apollo” missions, he would have been immediately thereafter indicted for War Crimes for overseeing the genocide, and the cover-up thereof, of hundreds of innocent people?

(See time 31:40 – 32:46 in Astronauts Gone Wild)

Another leading scientist at the time, James Van Allen, the discoverer of the radiation belts who so humbly named them after himself, originally said that the lethal radiation belts previously spoken of in this article, through which the “Apollo” crews would have been the only astronauts in history to have ever traversed in order to leave the safety of Earth orbit and reach the moon, if indeed their missions were real, would be “10-100 times more deadly than a lethal dose”! Under pressure from NASA, he too, like Braun, dramatically recanted his original findings in order to make it appear as if the moon landings were possible. Don’t believe me again? Below is the link to his original published findings in the respected national journal “Scientific American”, in which he plainly spoke about the radiation belts beyond earth orbit being an obstacle for practical space travel to the moon and beyond, just as Kelly Smith of the Orion mission did.

Van Allen himself plainly said in an article published in 1959 in “Scientific American” magazine after NASA sent probes with Geiger counters into the radiation belts:

Our measurements show that the maximum radiation level as of 1958 is equivalent to between 10 and 100 REM per hour, depending on the still undetermined proportion of protons to electrons. Since a human being exposed for two days to even 10 REM would have only an even chance of survival, the radiation belts obviously present an obstacle to space flight.

Click here to read: Van Allen Belts Deadly Radiation

Even “Apollo” astronaut Alan Bean, when I interviewed him unprepared for my challenging questions, accidentally admitted ON CAMERA that he DID NOT travel through the lethal “Van Allen” radiation belt (which is well above where the space station is or where the space shuttle or any other non-Apollo crew has ever flown). When I pointed out this error to him, he merely said, “Maybe we did (go through the radiation belts)”. When I asked him if he experienced any unusual phenomenon from traveling through the radiation belts, he said “No”. When I pointed out to him that a crew of the space shuttle, decades after his alleged “moon” mission, on the highest altitude of any space shuttle flight, more than 600 miles away from the intense radiation belts, experienced radiation that was so severe, even from more than 600 miles away, that they could see the radiation as sparks of lights through their closed eyelids, Bean then suddenly remembered seeing the same phenomenon! When I pointed out to him that this space shuttle crew was the first of any astronauts in history to report this strange phenomenon, he changed his story a third time to keep up with the revelatory facts, and immediately recanted what he had just said about seeing the radioactive “sparks of light” in the first place! . . . Absolutely amazing!

(See Alan Bean’s accidental truth telling, and failed attempt to cover it up, at 13:41 – 18:53 in Astronauts Gone Wild)

(You can also see at time 27:30 – 27:45 in Astronauts Gone Wild that Cernan says that the descent engine to the lunar surface was “very loud” while Bean says that “you couldn’t hear it because of the vacuum of space”.)

Did I mention that each astronaut asked for Two Thousand Dollars an Hour in CASH for the honor of being lied to?

Not only are all of the specifications, blueprints, and telemetry data of the miraculous NASA 1960’s technology that allegedly went to the moon on the first attempt nowhere to be found, all of the original television transmission videotapes, estimated to weigh about two tons, have also been mysteriously “misplaced” inside the Federally Secured National Archives! Why? Because naïve director Ron Howard, whose own wise grandfather warned him that the moon landings were staged, requested that all of the original videotapes be transferred to High Definition for an I-Max documentary he was producing to commemorate the “moon” missions. Prior to this, the highest quality version of the original footage that anyone had ever seen was deliberately fourth generation (a copy of a copy of a copy of a copy), in order to disguise the falsification detail of the fake “moon” landscapes.

When this moon landing believing prominent film director asked for the original NASA videotapes of all of the “moon walks” to be transferred to High Definition in order to be projected onto a screen that was nearly 120 feet by 100 feet for the first time in history, for all the world to see at a resolution that was at least four times greater in detail than had ever before been witnessed, within days of his request, all of the original videotapes vanished from the Federal Archives!!! But of course, we still went to the moon, right?

Proof of this, is that when Howard’s documentary commemorating the “moon” landings was finally produced without this essential material, he resorted to filling about 95 percent of the gap with “reenactments” of the “moon walks”, which he likewise filmed in a television studio. In fact, there was so little actual footage available of the alleged greatest event of the 20th century, that this multimillion dollar director had to resort to renting VHS tapes of other filmmaker’s previous work at Blockbuster Video in order to have at least some of the vanishing NASA footage! He was so ashamed of the low quality of the images he was forced to use because of the scarcity of them, that he reduced their size within the nearly 120 foot by 100 foot screen to only about 10 percent of the available space.

In case you were wondering “what if”, someday, the mysteriously vanished original videotapes were to one day be found ? . . .  Oops! . . . Did I forget to tell you? . . . The only machine on the entire planet that could ever play these one of a kind format videotapes was deliberately disassembled and destroyed by NASA, right after the originals got “misplaced”, making that scenario absolutely impossible!

As various nations and private enterprises finally, after nearly fifty years, have the capability to send microwave oven sized probes to the moon (still no men), NASA has quickly drafted regulations to keep their alleged manned landing sites of the Nixon administration completely off-limits. They have said that any flyovers of the coordinates, or ground incursions thereof, into these areas by probes, to prove or disprove their authenticity, are strictly forbidden. (Since when does the US government own the moon?) You would think that they would gladly welcome independent proof (which there has never been) that their outrageous scientific claims of 1960’s technology were real (even though the feat cannot be repeated today), especially in the face of growing universal doubt, yet the exact opposite proves to be the case. (It is like a murderer who boasts of his innocence refusing to give a DNA sample, when DNA evidence was left at the crime scene.)

China, a trillion dollar trading partner of the United States, recently sent a probe to the moon. As all of the moon is uniformly desolate and one landing site is just about as good as any other, I would think that the perfect and most logical place to land would be that of the United State’s alleged first manned mission, to prove to the world that their probe was really on the moon. Yet if the Apollo 11 artifacts are not there themselves, this might be biting the trillion dollar hand that feeds you. Subsequently, China steered clear of any supposed NASA manned landing sites for any of their lunar probes.

Astrobotic Technology, a private firm, had planned to land a probe precisely at the claimed Apollo 11 landing site, as they too saw this as the most logical choice, yet because of pressure from NASA not to do so, and subsequently embarrass the organization and nation for not really having landed on the moon in the 1960’s, the president of the company, John Thornton, caved in and agreed not to land there as originally planned, even though the moon is owned by no one and he was “free” to do so. (Is it freedom when scientific exploration is completely altered because of political pressure from a government agency?)

Why is it then, that with such obviousness of this fraud, with the numerous sound arguments presented above, the facts of it are being completely ignored ? I suppose it has to do with one of the unique things about the moon landing fraud, that it may be the only positive conspiracy that was ever perpetrated. Think about it, whoever killed Kennedy, he is still dead. Whoever did 911, there are still three thousand people dead. Yet with the moon landing fraud, it made everyone feel good! When you try to take that away from people, they do not like it! It is like telling someone that a famous fireman who saved a baby from a burning building, and later became the most popular president of all time because of it, staged the whole thing to make money and a name for himself. Even if it is true, most people would rather believe the lie instead!

The coming of the lawless one will be in accordance with the work of Satan, displayed in counterfeit miracles, deceiving all those who are perishing. They perish because they refuse to love the truth and so be saved.

2nd Thessalonians 2:9-10

The moon landings are called “A celebration of the greatest human achievement” . . . and I am the one trying to take this glorious revelry away from everyone!

Is there anyone left who loves the truth more than feeling good?

If putting a man on the moon is supposed to be “the greatest achievement of mankind”, then certainly not doing it, lying about it to the entire world, embezzling tens of billions of dollars in the process, deceiving and misleading college students, high school students, scientists, academics, congress, the senate, and future space pioneers who will endanger their lives thinking it was so easy to go to the moon in the 60’s, then this event, the falsification of the moon landings, out of pride, greed, and arrogance, is REALLY one of the most profound events in human history. The falsification of the moon landings is more profound historically than if they had actually gone.

Do you see this?

This great truth, as to the TRUE nature of mankind, the deceptive, arrogant, and criminal nature, is being withheld from the majority, by the few people at the top, because they think they are better than the rest of us! This great truth, that could humble mankind into changing our character before it is too late, is being withheld from the masses, like a cure for cancer. One of the greatest events in human history, the falsification of the moon landings, out of pride, greed, and arrogance, is being withheld from public consciousness, the very disclosure of which would cause its advancement, and without which, our moral and intellectual growth will be forever stunted.

Shame and dishonor to our country’s leaders who give congressional medals of “honor” to the biggest liars of us all.

When it comes to perceiving the truth in a world full of lies, historically, the majority has always been deceived, and later proved wrong, by the minority of their contemporaries, whom they persecuted and considered deceived at the time, when in fact it was they who were deceived. Does a person know it when they are deceived? No, they do not. They defend the lie with red faces and clinched teeth.

The majority of scientists thought the world was flat, the majority of astronomers thought the earth was the center of the universe, the majority of physicians thought bleeding the sickness out of a person was a cure, the majority of congressmen thought Nixon was honest, and a majority of scientists, astronomers, physicians, and congressmen think the moon landings were real, yet their titles and majority do not equal truth, as history has well proven, and will prove again.

Why is it so difficult for them to see the truth?  Very simple . . . Pride.

“The Pride of your heart has deceived you.”

Obadiah 1:3

Pride is simply the unwillingness to be wrong, just as humility is the willingness to be wrong. The great thing about being wrong, which is what I had to finally admit about the moon landings, is that I am learning something new, and I am no longer walking through life in error. The bad thing about being right all the time, is that I cannot learn anything new, and I am living my life in a self-deceived state, which is the very worst form of deception. When someone else deceives me, if I try hard enough, I can eventually figure it out, after all, I know that other people cannot be trusted all of the time. Yet when I am self-deceived, it is nearly impossible to overcome, because the person I am relying on for “facts” is myself, and of course I can trust myself! . . . even when I am wrong.

When someone considers themselves smart, this is the first step towards their ignorance. They boast about their years of experience and degrees, and thereby pour concrete around their finite knowledge, unawaringly calling their stone mound of limited facts, the entire universe of truth. If you try to tell them they are wrong, they will defend their post to their emotional and intellectual death at all cost, all the while attempting to defile you with their venomous words for pointing out their mistake, even if you are right, just like those previously mentioned throughout history.

Just like OJ Simpson’s lawyers, who later admitted they knew of his guilt and were only “doing their job”, no matter how plain the evidence, their deceptive lawyer-like minds have an explanation for why facts are fictions, and fictions are facts. With every evidence I submit as to why the moon landings were falsified, no matter how condemning, there is always a zealous pride-filled counterpart to throw away the truth and institute a lie in its place, with each and every piece of factual evidence, just like OJ Simpson’s defenders. Just because someone has an explanation for something, or everything, does not mean that the explanation is true.

Rather than looking for the truth, even at the cost of being wrong, the majority of people, because of their blinding pride in the accomplishments of themselves and like-minded others, instead “Gather around them a great number of teachers to tell them what their itching ears want to hear”. (2nd Timothy 4:3) In other words, rather than looking for the truth, they look for people to agree with what they already believe, so as to prove themselves right.

The extremely simple fact is this: After Columbus traveled to the new world, everyone else traveled to the new world.  After Lewis and Clark traveled to the American west, everyone else traveled to the American west.  After the Wright brothers accomplished powered flight, everyone else did immediately thereafter.

Lindbergh first flew across the Atlantic in an airplane in 1927. Five decades later there were millions of airplanes flying across the Atlantic. Soon it will be five decades since America allegedly had men leisurely playing golf on the moon in complete safety with 1960’s technology, all on the first attempt. In comparison, the 747 aircraft, built after seventy years of successful aviation history and millions of manufactured aircraft, was developed at the very same time as the “Apollo” spacecraft, the first ever vehicle to take men to another planet, yet it took one year longer to construct and made over 160 failed attempts before it finally got off of the ground!

Interestingly, more computing power today is found in a ten dollar watch than was in the entire Apollo program, including the entire spacecraft and all of the computers at “Houston Control”, and yet for some reason, no one, from any nation on earth, has been able to go to the moon and survive, not even ONCE, with five decades more advanced technology . . . WHY? . . . There is only ONE possible answer . . . (It is soooooooo simple, yet people refuse to see the unpleasant truth)  . . .  Because it cannot be done . . . Even today!

Technology does not go backwards!!!  (Unless the moon landings were real . . . Then for the first time in world history, technology has gone backwards!)

If all the scientists from all the nations on earth cannot go to the moon today with all the newer technology that the 21st century has to offer, it simply means, and it cannot mean anything else, that America did not go to the moon in the 1960’s.  Again, Technology does not go backwards!  It is sooooo obvious to anyone with an open mind who does not have a religious attachment to the event.

Just as Hitler’s children, if he had any, would have a hard time seeing dear old papa as anything but a benevolent patriarch, these mired tunnel-visioned “intellectuals” and misdirected beguiled “patriots” will seldom admit that their enamored “scientific” community and “glorious” government can be just as corrupt as pedophile priest.

 “God opposes the proud, yet gives grace to the humble.”

James 4:6

“Tell my people their transgression.”

Isaiah 58:1

“Apollyon” (the origin of “Apollo”) means

“The Devil” or “Deceiver”

Revelation 9:11

“The truth will set you free.”

John 8:32

“Have I become your enemy by telling you the truth?”

Galatians 4:16

“The further a society drifts from the truth,

the more it will hate those who speak it.”

George Orwell

Brother Bart-

Donate

References: 

A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon” – Video

“Conspiracy Theory: Did We Land on the Moon” – Video

Astronauts Gone Wild – Video

Bart Sibrel Debuts NASA False Photography Nationwide – Video

NASA Admits Radiation Belts Impassable

Van Allen Admits Radiation Belts are 10-100 Times a Lethal Dose

NASA Forbids Independent Lunar Probes from Verifying Apollo Sites

CIA Plants Fake News Stories with Corporate Cooperation

Fake Moon Rock Found in Museum – Article

Science is Political – Article

Lie Centered CIA Insults Truth Seekers – Article

Why We Get Mad When Others Challenge What We Believe – Article

USA Government Uses Wikipedia to Smear and Defame Alternate Media Personalties – Article

NSA  Uses Wikipedia and Other Social Media for Propaganda – Article

CIA Lies on Wikipedia and Other Sites “To Protect National Security” – Article

How the CIA and NSA Manipulate the Internet – Article

Spy Agencies Manipulate Online Polls – Article




Bart Sibrel  is an award winning filmmaker, writer and investigative journalist who has been producing movies and television programs for thirty years. During this time he has owned five production companies, been employed by two of the three major networks and produced films shown on ABC, NBC, CNN, TLC, USA, BET, as well as The Tonight Show with Jay Leno. To discuss his films, he has appeared and been interviewed on The Daily Show, Geraldo, NBC, CNN, FOX, Tech TV, Coast to Coast, and The Abrams Report. Articles featuring Mr. Sibrel’s films have been published in Time Magazine, The New York Times, The Washington Post, The L.A. Times, USA Today and many others.  His top awards from the American Motion Picture Society include “Best Cinematography”, “Best Editing” and “Top Ten Director”. As the writer and director of the infamous “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon” which exposed the moon landing hoax, Mr. Sibrel has collected over the years innumerous military, government, industrial and private sources for credible firsthand verification of very real conspiratorial crimes against humanity. He will use these contacts and experience in exposing the true and unbelievably horrific intentions of the hidden minority who have diabolical intentions for mankind in his monthly Sleuth Journal column “Conspiracy Corner”.  When such concepts are speculative and unverified, Mr. Sibrel will acknowledge this and openly discuss the leading possibilities as a cautionary benediction. Be sure to visit his site at Sibrel.com and subscribe to his Youtube Channel.

If you are so inclined, you may Donate to his endeavors.

Kuwait Mandates DNA Database For All Residents

 dna-kuwait

By: Brandon Turbeville | Activist Post

Never a country known for its human rights and civil liberties, Kuwait is now attempting to take the lead in the Gulf for the country most integrated with the technological control grid and biometric surveillance state. This is because the small nation recently announced the passage of a law that mandates every person residing in Kuwait must submit to a DNA sample that will be stored in a massive database upon penalty of fines and jail time.

Kuwait has 1.3 million citizens that will be subject to the law but its 2.9 million foreign residents are subject as well. Any person who refuses to submit to the DNA tests and data mining operation will be subject to $33,000 in fines and up to one year in prison. Any person who provides a fake sample will face up to seven years.

StopFriskDNATest_1

Kuwait passed this law conveniently after an Islamic State (and thus NATO-directed) bombing of a Shiite mosque on June 26. The law is being justified as a way to make it easier for law enforcement to track down criminals and terrorists after the attacks have been committed. Thus, the incident stands as another Problem-Reaction-Solution-style terrorist attack justifying an even more totalitarian police state response.

“We have approved the DNA testing law and approved the additional funding. We are prepared to approve anything needed to boost security measures in the country,” independent MP Jamal Al Omar said.

Kuwait now stands as the only country in the world that makes DNA tests and participation in a DNA database compulsory. But is it just the first? After all, many countries including England, Australia, Sweden, and the United States maintain stored databases of the DNA of convicted criminals with the United States maintaining a database of the DNA of even those who have merely been arrested but not convicted. In addition, the U.S. database also maintains the DNA of missing persons and their families. Now, with the exception of Kuwait, the United States maintains the world’s largest DNA database.

The growing number of countries building, maintaining, and subsequently mandating various forms of biometric identification and biometric databases is not only concerning, it is becoming the norm. In 2012, India launched a nationwide program involving the allocation of a Unique Identification Number (UID) to every single one of its 1.2 billion residents. Each of the numbers are tied to the biometric data of the recipient using three different forms of information – fingerprints, iris scans, and pictures of the face. All ten digits of the hand will be recorded, and both eyes are scanned.

The Japanese have had a mandatory national UID system in place since 2002, under the Basic Resident Register (BRR) program. Under the BRR, each individual must provide their name, birthdate, gender, and physical address to municipal governments who, in turn, issue the citizen a UID. However, an update to the initiative, called My Number Bill, was introduced in February 2012 that streamlined the information sharing process between government tax, social security, and emergency mitigation agencies. This was merely the next phase toward the goal of the Japanese government to centralize already-collected information about each one of its citizens and to expand this program to contain even more data. The information collected on Japanese citizens under their current system is fed into a nationwide computer database known as the Juki-net, which is made up of 3,200 municipal governments. The Juki-net serves as the common data sharing database between the municipal governments and, to some extent, the central government.

Israel also has a mandatory biometrics program. As Justin Lee writes for BiometricUpdate.com,

Initially passed by the Knesset in December 2009, the Biometric Database Law mandates the collection of fingerprints and facial images from all Israeli residents, as well as integrating these biometric details in domestic ID cards and national passports.

The legislation also called for the creation of a biometric government database for the purpose of managing access control, identification of individuals and to help law enforcement officials locate criminal suspects. The law is intended to curb identity theft, as well as the loss, theft and destruction of the current blue ID cards issued by the Interior Ministry.

In a report submitted to the Prime Minister’s Office and to the Knesset Chairman, Erdan emphasized the importance of implementing the biometric system and said the transition would be gradual.

“Smart biometric records that cannot be faked […] will lead to the full protection of the identity of Israeli citizens,” Erdan told Channel 10. “It will provide a balance between our duty to ensure the security of citizens and our duty to protect their privacy. We will promote a gradual transition to mandatory biometric documentation.”

The first phase of the biometric identification system was implemented in June 2013, and since then, some 640,000 people have volunteered to submit their biometric details to the database, said Erdan.

While most of the data collection and database storage via biometrics in the United States is rolled out under the auspices of greater convenience, concepts such as biometric programs for food stamp recipients, and employee tagging are gaining traction, indicating that the push for the eventual mandating of participation in such programs is clearly not far off.

Kuwait may be the first in terms of mandating DNA database participation in the world, but it is only first. Kuwait simply stands as the latest country to make a step forward in the international game of leap frog toward a global surveillance state, technological control grid, and total prison planet.


Brandon Turbeville is an author out of Florence, South Carolina. He has a Bachelor’s Degree from Francis Marion University and is the author of six books, Codex Alimentarius — The End of Health Freedom, 7 Real Conspiracies, Five Sense Solutions and Dispatches From a Dissident, volume 1 and volume 2, and The Road to Damascus: The Anglo-American Assault on Syria. Turbeville has published over 500 articles dealing on a wide variety of subjects including health, economics, government corruption, and civil liberties. Brandon Turbeville’s podcast Truth on The Tracks can be found every Monday night 9 pm EST at UCYTV. He is available for radio and TV interviews. Please contact activistpost (at) gmail.com.

Obeying The Nefarious Warrior Organism

obey-your-government-truthchannel_jpg_w560h315

 “It is not my intention to doubt that the doctrine of the Illuminati and the principles of Jacobinism had not spread in the United States. On the contrary, no one is more satisfied of this fact than I am.” – George Washington

The world is out of control. Well, that seems to be the reaction to the populist. However, for the New World Order, all systems are a go and the ability to manipulate governments is vivid evidence that a global authoritarian force is the actual ruler over the planet. Most people deny this assessment and are fearful to come to grips with the significance that nations no longer matter. The path to domination by Luciferian Technocrats Rule the New World Order is the operative principle underlying social cultures, international affairs and economic activities.

The historic organizational structure of the nation state is in serious decline and verges on extinction in many places. The facade on a map or a vote in a plebiscite exemplifies the lack of real power flowing from the will of the people. Chalk up another casualty in the war against self-determination.

Prof Michel Chossudovsky explains the monetary tactics used for controlling rowdy dissent. The article, Prime Minister Tsipras ’ Bailout Reform Package: An Act of Treason against the Greek People, reveals the method.

“What must be understood is that creditors are not necessarily strung on outright reimbursement of sovereign debt. Quite the opposite. Their objective is to make the debt go up through so-called debt rescheduling, which essentially allows them to lend more money to the debtor. This new money then facilitates the process of debt servicing. “We will lend you the money and with the money we lend you, you will pay us back.” New loans to pay back old debts.

This procedure has been routinely applied as part of the IMF-World Bank structural adjustment program (SAP) for more than thirty years. The debt burden goes up. The country is increasingly in a straightjacket. The creditors call the shots on macro-economic reform.”

So when the Greeks capitulate to austerity and external monitoring to after 17 hours of late night talks end in ‘a-Greek-ment’, the preeminence of international finance is reaffirmed.

“The Greek PM has this morning defended last night’s basis for an agreement, arguing that he managed to resist measures that would have led to a collapse of the banking system.”

Note that the objective for the preservation of the banking system was not concerned with keeping Greece functioning, but to guarding the bulwarks of the Rothschild world of a central banking system. This same game plays out in every corner and crack of finance, but now the focus has shifted to commandeer the sovereign debt obligations of every bankrupt regime in trouble.

The video Greece #ThisIsACoup: Banksters Seize Sovereignty & Assets explains exactly what just took place.

When debt created money is created as an accounting entry in the ledgers of a lending banking institution, the risk of recovering future interest payments evaporate since new money will simply be made available for the ubiquitous roll over.

This scheme should be well understood. Nonetheless, the consensus of establishment administrators and gatekeepers ignore or outright deny that the formula for compliance far surpasses lawyerly contracts and pledged collateral.

The basis for a proper understanding of the NWO is to gain the insight that the entire planet operates under the demands and threats streaming out of a Nefarious Warrior Organism.

A state of permanent war is indispensible for global conquest. Applying conditions and instances of instability is essential to force a chaotic volatility upon factions that resist the monocracy of planetary dominance.

Keep the countries in the neo-colonial system docile or instill a perpetual bedlam that destabilizes the very core of the society.

The price for an armistice is defined by the IMF and World Bank. Stripe the assets of the disgruntled masses and requires homage to accompany the repayment funds as the price for temporary relief.

The malicious nature of greater imposed governance, adopts all the brutal properties of an evolving tyrannical mechanism. The trend escalates to inflict higher levels of intrusion, demands and severe penalties for non-compliance.

Examining the organic evolution of the Nefarious Warrior Organism may seem futile since the actual results of this anti-human structure are so obvious for any thinking person to see. However, dismissing the evil character of the New World Order provides ample fuel to spread and grow the reach of the monster.

If resisting evil is not part of your own ethical universe, there is no hope for your salvation. One of the most destructive characteristics of a failed society is the rejection of time honored moral commandments.

Now a commandment is often associated with the Mosaic Law in Exodus 20:1-17, and then at Deuteronomy 5:4-21. Yet, one need not be a believer to comprehend that any commandment, civil or spiritual is based upon some authority.

Within the annals of Western Civilization, usually a Caesar or a Church claimed the authority to define the rules. Now this model of organization is being eliminated in a methodical process of de-constructing traditional human culture. Society is degrading into a global gulag based upon debasing the sacred nature of life itself.

Agents for the Nefarious Warrior Organism will employ any means useful to the further disintegration of independent and individual autonomy. Since this assault on basic humanity has a villainous record, it would be valuable to review The Mattoid Syndrome by Archibald E. Roberts.

This argument and supporting evidence has been made available for decades. However, few are willing or bold enough to confront the global tyrants. The giant leap from a focus on blaming your own government for the decline in social standards and a descent into economic oblivion keeps the discussion confined to class warfare, divide and conquer and political diversion.

The stigma of mass media demonization and smears of being a being labeled a conspiracy theorist, has weak minded and cowards clinging to their muse of justifying their apathy.

However, the greatest contempt is reserved for counterfeit Christians who hang on to their apostate and heresy of scripture. Pastor Chuck Baldwin did seminal work in Romans 13 — Are Christians Required To Submit To Government Edict and Policy 100% of The Time?

“By the same token, a civil magistrate has authority in civil matters, but his authority is limited and defined. Observe that Romans Chapter 13 clearly limits the authority of civil government by strictly defining its purpose: “For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil . . . For he is the minister of God to thee for good . . . for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil.”

Notice that civil government must not be a “terror to good works.” It has no power or authority to terrorize good works or good people. God never gave it that authority. And any government that oversteps that divine boundary has no divine authority or protection.

Civil government is a “minister of God to thee for good.” It is a not a minister of God for evil. Civil magistrates have a divine duty to “execute wrath upon him that doeth evil.” They have no authority to execute wrath upon him that doeth good. None. Zilch. Zero. And anyone who says they do is lying.”

Now expand this view of limited civil authority as a restrain on any particular government and seek a proper understanding that the very concept of a global governance conflicts with the reality that supreme authority is embodied in divine providence.

The essay, Can a moral revival happen where God is dead?, asks an existential question. When non believers multiply and dismiss Almighty revelations, the Satanic Nefarious Warrior Organism exerts temporary domination.

Obedience to NWO governance intended to end national sovereignty and dehumanize individuals is the ultimate transgression.

Multiply all the crazed Agenda 21 initiatives, fabricated foreign involvements, international governance and top down control of global affairs is demonic in its essence.

Those who have doubts that God will intercede to defeat the juggernaut of world diabolic slavery should pause and reflect by what other power is possible to defeat the Nefarious Warrior Organism?

History is replete of caustic empire madmen. What is different today is that the planet is consolidating competing blocs under the configuration of a universal despotism.

Actual dissent is in short supply from institutions, politicians and corporations. The system is closer to total mastery because most individuals will just accept their enslavement in the normal course of living their lives.

Regrettably, such people have done little to gain respect from their fellow man.

Politics is inescapable, yet most “citizens of the world” lack the fortitude to become heroes to humanity. With the EU bailout of Greece, the 300 Spartans died at Thermopylae in vain. The Nefarious Warrior Organism won this battle and the prospects for Western society has devolved into the depths of Hades.

The face of the devil wears a designer bankster suit. Start the countdown, the path to the Apocalypse has just moved closer. The necessary moral response is total resistance.

By the end of this decade we will live under the first One World Government that has ever existed in the society of nations… a government with absolute authority to decide the basic issues of survival. One world government is inevitable. – Karl Wojtyla: AKA Pope John Paul II 


SARTRE is the pen name of James Hall, a reformed, former political operative. This pundit’s formal instruction in History, Philosophy and Political Science served as training for activism, on the staff of several politicians and in many campaigns. A believer in authentic Public Service, independent business interests were pursued in the private sector. As a small business owner and entrepreneur, several successful ventures expanded opportunities for customers and employees. Speculation in markets, and international business investments, allowed for extensive travel and a world view for commerce. He is retired and lives with his wife in a rural community. “Populism” best describes the approach to SARTRE’s perspective on Politics. Realities, suggest that American Values can be restored with an appreciation of “Pragmatic Anarchism.” Reforms will require an Existential approach. “Ideas Move the World,” and SARTRE’S intent is to stir the conscience of those who desire to bring back a common sense, moral and traditional value culture for America. Not seeking fame nor fortune, SARTRE’s only goal is to ask the questions that few will dare … Having refused the invites of an academic career because of the hypocrisy of elite’s, the search for TRUTH is the challenge that is made to all readers. It starts within yourself and is achieved only with your sincere desire to face Reality. So who is SARTRE? He is really an ordinary man just like you, who invites you to join in on this journey. Visit his website at http://batr.org.

Ron Paul: Can There Be A “Right” To Gay Marriage? (VIDEO)

ron paul gay marriage

Last week the US Supreme Court ruled that all states must recognize same-sex marriage. How did they come to this decision and was it correct? Who decides?

Ron Paul: Hello everybody, and thank you for tuning in to The Liberty Report. Daniel McAdams is with me today, who is the executive director of the Institute for Peace and Prosperity. Daniel, welcome to the program.

Daniel McAdams: Thanks, Dr. Paul, it’s good to be with you.

Ron Paul: Well, what do you think is the big issue right now, did anything happen this past week, or were there several things that happened this past week?

Daniel McAdams: There was a lot that happened, we had the Obama Care decision, which you wrote about in your weekly column this week, which was big news. I think the bigger news that we were going to talk about today is the Supreme Court decision on same-sex marriage. It’s interesting because back when you were in office, we did a lot of Thursday Lunches with the separation of powers. We had Lewis Fisher, who is a great expert on this, and we talked about the different branches of government. I was really interested in the way this decision was presented in the media, that the Supreme Court legalized same-sex marriage.

Ron Paul: The one headline that I saw was, “Same Sex Marriage: Is it right?”, and for a long time I’ve been saying this, and I might have to change my speech, but I get a good response when I talk to a crowd of people who have some bit of an understanding about rights, saying that rights do not come from our government, rights come to us in a natural or God given way. And people say yes. But here, all of a sudden, same sex marriage is a right declared not by the Congress or the supreme court, but really by one individual in the Supreme Court in a 5 to 4 ruling, and all of a sudden, this is a new right. But when people hear us talking like that, they say, “Oh, they’re against the ruling and that means they’re bigots”, and all these things that people want to pin on us. But there’s a lot more to it than just that. for instance, I think it raises the issue of licensing, what they’re really talking about is license to get married. They’re changing how you get a license, the Federal Courts are over ruling what states have done and, in many ways, they’re changing the definition of marriage, which seems to be way beyond anything that governments are supposed to do. Matter Of fact, I’m convinced that much of this maybe could have been prevented by having a lot of less laws in the land.

Daniel McAdams: Seems like both sides have it wrong; the supporters of traditional families seem to have it wrong, and the pro same-sex marriage people seem to have it wrong.

Ron Paul: Yes, because I don’t think we should be involved in it. I see marriage as a sacrament, but not everybody wants to see it as a sacrament. But why is the government involved in a sacrament and say, “Okay, we’re going to have a license for you to participate in a sacrament”. Baptism, for many in this country, is still a sacrament, but we don’t go out and get a license. The question comes up, why have we succumbed to this to accept this idea that none of us can get married. I would assume you probably have a license, I certainly had a license, it was assumed, no questions asked. But that’s not the way it’s been for a long time. Looking into this, I found out that there are many that defend the position that this came about from the civil war, it came about because racism existed, and it came out because they wanted to prevent blacks marrying whites. That particular understanding was reversed in 1967 by the Supreme Court. It isn’t so much that the court is supposed to sort this thing out. If we lived in a libertarian and free society, that would be out of the way and you would be allowed to make up your own definition: do whatever you want as long as you didn’t exert aggression against somebody else. And those who believe in traditional marriage could have their traditional marriage and get married in the church, and those who want a secular marriage can do that too. But I don’t think we’re anywhere close to that today.

Daniel McAdams: The pro-traditional marriage people say that this will ruin marriage, this will undermine marriage. We were talking before the show and you mentioned a couple of interesting statistic about so called traditional marriage. You said 57% of millennials have their children out of wedlock, more than half of the pregnancies result in abortions, and we know that well more than half of marriages end in divorce. So it seems like traditional marriages are doing a pretty good job of destroying traditional marriage.

Ron Paul: I think this is an issue, matter of fact, I have even made the case that abortion is not legalistic in that you’re going to make a moral society. You can have laws regarding it because there’s a killing going on, but it doesn’t change anything. I think the courts are very, very political, people say, “They don’t have to be political because they have life time tenures”, but they are very political even during the abortion debates. Abortions were done wholesale in the 1960s, so the courts had to catch up, and in a way the courts are sort of catching up now with this. The whole point is that they can’t change anything, you can’t change a culture by legislation, so that’s why libertarians will make the point that if there’s no violence involved, don’t try to micro-manage this. So who’s right, who has the control of the definition. In a libertarian society, nobody does, but here, I think the people who believe in traditional marriage fall short in traditional marriages when they have a chance. But they shouldn’t go to the government and tell the government, “You are going to define it my way”, even though they might have a historical argument for that. At the same time, the secular people want to march in and say, “No, that’s exclusive”, I think so often we bring on so many problems and, to tell you the truth, I don’t think this is going to end. There have been people who suggest that this is just opening up the door for more and more problems, because there is an exclusion and it’s a religious exclusion. If it’s against your religious beliefs and they sort of did this with abortion, and I saw times when you as residents were forced to be involved, but eventually they said that if you had a personal objection to it then you didn’t have to participate, and that’s what they’re saying here. But I think you’re going to have lots of problems, possibly even in the military, who knows what might happen in the military.

Daniel McAdams: The Chaplains may be forced to do it against their will.

Ron Paul: Yes, and there could be problems in college campuses, we still have some religious colleges that will talk about mandatory dorm regulations. I think this ruling was a defeat for the constitution and a defeat for liberty, because both sides are rejecting the libertarian approach, they’re just arguing who gets to do this and that, and I think it’s a victory for big government. There was a time when I’ve tried to sort out judicial review, and we might do a program some day on this. Even Jefferson and Hamilton argued about how much review should be there, and even back then some argued that the courts should not even have the right to review congressional laws. But today it is epidemic. The Supreme Court believes they can rule on anything and everything, be it state rules, regulations, or politically correct ideas. And now they’re ruling and saying, “We are the arbitrator, we will say what marriage is”. You know they gave Kennedy some credit for saying some nice words about people who are in love have a right to come together and be a unit. But if love is the thing that brings us together, the argument can be made from maybe a legalistic viewpoint, that what if 3 or 4 people are in love. Are you going to be the arbitrator of who loves who? So, therefore, there’s going to be an expansion. I think it’s going to invite a lot more problems, and it’s not going to be solved just with this.

Daniel McAdams: As you say, popular perception is that the Supreme Court is the final verdict on these things, and the media presents it that way, I think people even think that way. We’ve had several guests in the old days on the luncheons who have said that that’s an absolutely crazy thought.

Ron Paul: In principle, I’ve challenged this whole idea of getting a license for a sacrament. But I challenge the principle of licensing everything, because a license is almost always used to exclude people. I’ve already mentioned it was used initially to exclude interracial marriages, so it was an exclusion. But if you have a license to be a plumbers, and say that plumbers have to have licenses, what are you doing? You’re excluding somebody else? Why doesn’t the customer decide whether he’s a plumber or not, or let his reputation or what his promises are decide whether he’s a plumber or not. But no, if you give them a license, then you have this cab drivers. Right now, there are some challenges to the licensing of cab drivers. But there is licensing of everything, and even if I argued the case that the states should not be involved in all this licensing, now it’s federal, which makes it more complicated. I want people to get back to the point of asking how is this compared to a libertarian society. This is more complex, because it’s always government: who’s going to get control of the government? Then you get intervention in economic policy: how are we going to take care of the poor? They say, “Well, we’ll take from this group and give it to this group and we’ll fix wages”, and all these things, rather than saying, “Maybe the poor could be taken care of better if we had a free society and sound money”. This is why I’m so strongly annoyed with all this, because it assume that this is a responsibility of government, and I do not believe that is the case. This is just mischief and there’s a lot of attention towards it, and I think it’s pretty amazing that there’s a lot to be said about the need for traditional marriage. But none of this stuff is going other help traditional marriage, matter of fact, it emphasis so much that the people who believe in traditional marriages are going the wrong way. We need to clean up our act and find out what traditional marriage is all about. In the same way, with the abortion issue, there are some people who are arguing that the abortion rate is somewhat down. But I was thinking, maybe that is good, maybe education is good, but who knows what is the real reason. Divorce rates may be down because people aren’t getting married. But these kind of things should be solved in a voluntary society, and of course, this society would be more peaceful, because if you want to be part of the freedom movement, you have one very, very strict rule. And that is the rejection of the use force, personal force, or legal force, by the government to do certain things. And, of course, it means you have to be tolerant of other people’s choices, you shouldn’t be too tolerant of government’s use of force, that is what we should be intolerant of.

Anyway, I’d like to thank everybody for tuning in today to The Liberty Report, and please come back soon.

This video was published by the Ron Paul Institute.

Obamacare Is A Public Requiem By Supreme Decree

coletoon_obamacare-11-16
“The Congressional Record will forever show that [Obamacare] was passed in a romper room of overgrown children seemingly barely old enough to keep from peeing on themselves.” –Matt Taibbi

Do you have an absolute right to refuse medical treatment? Well, if you recognize the immutable authority of natural rights, you must defend the birthright of individuals to reject the quackery of government-imposed medicine. Common law clearly discerns that there are limits on the power of governments to force human beings into becoming pinned up sheep, against their will. Already far too many cowardly citizens are eager to comply with the next dictate of a tyrannical regime. Subsequently, when the death panels summon you into their diagnostic pool of drugs, why would you want to accept the pharmaceutical prescription for a controlled and managed demise?

Obamacare is unmistakably a tax. If government levees a tariff on a taxpayer, that is not news. However, when inclusion into a collectivist system of government medicine becomes mandatory, the life essence of individual will is sucked out of the body of an immortal spirit.

The legality of the mandates is up for grabs by a tribunal of Star Chamber jurists. The sideshow about recusal, rivals reality TV programming and confuses the constitutional illiterates. Solicitor General Elena Kagan, in all her glory, conveyed her delight. “I hear they have the votes, Larry!! Simply amazing,” Kagan said to Harvard Law Prof. Laurence Tribe in one of the emails.

obamacareCNSnews reports,

“The March 2010 email exchange between Kagan and Tribe raises new questions about whether Kagan must recuse herself from judging cases involving the health-care law that Obama signed–and which became the target of legal challenges–while Kagan was serving as Obama’s solicitor general and was responsible for defending his administration’s positions in court disputes.

According to 28 USC 455, a Supreme Court justice must recuse from “any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” The law also says a justice must recuse anytime he has “expressed an opinion concerning the merits of the particular case in controversy” while he “served in governmental employment.”

The argument made by the Nation that Justice Clarence Thomas must recuse himself from any ruling on the Affordable Care Act, because of his wife’s work as a conservative activist and lobbyist, where she specifically agitated for the repeal of “Obamacare”, conveniently ignores reality. Kagan was the person appointed to represent the federal government before the Supreme Court of the United States. Thomas was not a lobbyist. The difference should be self-evident for any objective observer.

The essential question never asked is how a nation of inherent autonomous individuals, would allow a politicized court to rule on natural human right authority. Your right to refuse inclusion into a medical insurance scheme, designed for gently leading you down death’s road, is inalienable. Obamacare is a question of exercising the right NOT to participate, much less about forced tribute to pay for the costs of hypochondriacs, who believe physicians are gracious drug pushers.

The electorate made their voice heard in the 2010 elections. The Tea Party eruption was largely a spontaneous repudiation of Obamacare. Criticism of the 112th Congress should be directed against the House for not having the guts to issue and vote upon articles of impeachment against the pretender president, who is bent on destroying the civil rights of mentally healthy citizens.

So why is the nation suffering from the tyranny of the inflicted? Wendell Potter, a former CIGNA executive-turned-whistleblower, lays out the reason in plain simple language.

“Opponents of the Affordable Care Act who believe the Supreme Court will declare the law unconstitutional are going to be disappointed next year when a majority of the nine justices vote to uphold it. It will likely be a 5-4 decision, but moderate conservative Anthony Kennedy will, I’m confident, recognize that without the law, the free-market system of health insurance, so highly valued by conservatives, will implode, sooner rather than later.

Here’s the reality. The provision of Obamacare at the heart of the constitutional challenge — the requirement that all Americans will have to buy health insurance if they’re not eligible for a public plan like Medicare or Medicaid — is a “must have” for the nation’s health insurance industry.”

If conservatives really value a free-market health insurance system, by what claim of legitimacy can court dictums be imposed, upon individuals who rationally and willfully refuse to be part of that medical injection revolving door treatment? A free-market business, especially the medicine cartel, needs to re-invent itself, not seek government imposed guaranteed funding subsidies.

In the NBC video report, the prospects that some conservative justices may well uphold this new expansion of government fiat into the lives of Americans is chilling. Jay Sekulow on MSNBC Discussing ObamaCare at the Supreme Court asks the question: Where will it stop? Expanding brand new federal powers is not an authentic conservative viewpoint.

The supreme decree for public enslavement that Obamacare represents, does not originate with the decision from the Supreme Court. It comes from the pathological sickness of the Nanny State, accepted by millions of intellectual cripples and self-absorbed government syncopates, looking for a bigger welfare check. Just maybe self-reliant folks, who go to great pains to live a healthy lifestyle, just do not want to be part of the medical meat grinder.

Reality Check: ObamaCare & Death Panels by Raven Clabough provides an update.

“Democrats found a way to achieve their goal by way of regulation instead, introduced by Obama Medicare chief Dr. Donald Berwick. A new Medicare regulation implemented on January 1, 2011 pays doctors to advise patients on options for end-of-life care, which includes advanced directives to forego aggressive life-sustaining treatment.

In addition to the end-of-life Medicare rule, state governments are implementing “death panels” of sorts to help handle their budget woes.”

Now view contracting positions on the impact of this reality in the video, Obamacare Death Panels Are Back!!! Even if you dismiss the prediction that Obamacare makes a concerted effort to rush your demise and hasten your mortality, prospects of arbitrary rationing are inevitable.

Dr. Donald J. Palmisano writes in the Washington Times,

grim reaper“With Medicare’s trustees predicting the Medicare program will go bankrupt in 2024 – five years earlier than was projected before the passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act – even Americans who strongly supported Obamacare have little choice but to acknowledge that Medicare must be reformed – and soon. While lawmakers continue to argue about the best way to protect this vital program for the seniors it serves and those who it has yet to serve, there is a growing bipartisan consensus that the Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB) is one provision of the new health law that will do more to undermine the program than save it.

Unfortunately, most people in the country, including seniors relying on Medicare, have no idea what IPAB is or how it will affect their lives if it ever becomes operational. More concerning, President Obama decided to make the board the centerpiece of his efforts to reduce the deficit by calling for it to be strengthened – not eliminated. Starting in 2015, the IPAB will give 15 unelected bureaucrats unprecedented power to slash billions of dollars from Medicare when spending exceeds targeted growth rates. The cuts made by the board will come on top of the $500 billion that was transferred from Medicare to a new entitlement program as a result of the new health care law.”

Add to this discretionary allocation, the revolting practice of exceptions. The issuance of waivers from the law to political favorites or “too big to fail” conglomerates, is blatantly a violation of equal protection. Yet, in the hologram construct that passes for lawful government, the whims of class warfare, becomes the standard for this abhorrent Obama administration. The favoritism of the corporate/state economy at the expense of main street free enterprise is as vivid as it has even been. The working poor and the self-employed can kiss their economic future goodbye. Obama wants the middle class to suck it up and become dependent parasites, in the brave new world of coerced medical experimentation.

The social fascists that bleed for universal health care, provided by a single payer bureaucracy are fundamentally statists. Strategies for repeal are weak and remote. Nina Owcharenko in Repealing Obamacare and Getting Health Care Right, describes accurately the problem but is unrealistic for a political solution.

“Congress must repeal the new law. Congress cannot build sound market-based health care reform on the PPACA foundation, which is utterly incompatible with a health care system based on consumer choice and free markets.

Beyond the unprecedented mandates, new taxes, massive entitlement expansion, unworkable and costly insurance provisions, and its failure to control costs, the new law concentrates enormous power in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). It creates a giant network for the federal micromanagement of health plans, benefits, insurance markets, and unprecedented intervention into the details of health care financing and the delivery of medical care.”

Repeal of Obamacare is justified. However, the supreme decree that enacted the original legislation comes from an inept and illicit political class. They will resist to the death, retracting their handy work. Even with new replacement legislators, the executive administration envisions a new cash cow for milking. If the Supreme Court upholds the constitutionality of Obamacare, your duty is to opt out of the government medial payment system. Encourage the implosion, or resign to total enslavement. This is your terminal and only existential choice.


SARTRE is the pen name of James Hall, a reformed, former political operative. This pundit’s formal instruction in History, Philosophy and Political Science served as training for activism, on the staff of several politicians and in many campaigns. A believer in authentic Public Service, independent business interests were pursued in the private sector. As a small business owner and entrepreneur, several successful ventures expanded opportunities for customers and employees. Speculation in markets, and international business investments, allowed for extensive travel and a world view for commerce. He is retired and lives with his wife in a rural community. “Populism” best describes the approach to SARTRE’s perspective on Politics. Realities, suggest that American Values can be restored with an appreciation of “Pragmatic Anarchism.” Reforms will require an Existential approach. “Ideas Move the World,” and SARTRE’S intent is to stir the conscience of those who desire to bring back a common sense, moral and traditional value culture for America. Not seeking fame nor fortune, SARTRE’s only goal is to ask the questions that few will dare … Having refused the invites of an academic career because of the hypocrisy of elite’s, the search for TRUTH is the challenge that is made to all readers. It starts within yourself and is achieved only with your sincere desire to face Reality. So who is SARTRE? He is really an ordinary man just like you, who invites you to join in on this journey. Visit his website at http://batr.org.

Is Charleston Shooting A Trojan Horse For Internet Censorship?

censored

In a democratic system where political leaders are purportedly responsive to public opinion a pretext must be presented in order to introduce policies that are seen by the majority as controversial or undesirable. News coverage of the Charleston Church shooting over the past several days suggests how a storyline is being shaped by corporate news media and political leaders to lay the groundwork for intensified government regulation of online speech.

daily news roofOn February 26, 2015 the Federal Communications Commission passed a substantial policy document increasing its authority over the web. Such control could potentially be imposed to circumvent First Amendment protections of free speech by targeting websites based on their political perspectives and content.

The Charleston shooting narrative now being drummed in to the public mind maintains that Dylann Roof carried out his heinous act after having been “radicalized” by reading conservative “right wing” political websites. He consequently became filled with “hate” and morphed into a sinister “lone wolf terrorist.”

As ABC News reports:

Investigators believe that the man accused of fatally shooting nine people in a historic Charleston church last week was “self-radicalized,” … meaning that he was not believed to be part of a hate group, and acted alone as well.

That hasn’t stopped investigators from serving subpoenas to internet and telecommunications companies. In doing so, it will allow investigators to recreate the 21-year-old’s entire digital footprint.

Much as the Sandy Hook massacre scenario emphasized Adam Lanza’s wayward parenting and learning disabilities to sell the American public on mandatory mental health screenings for school children, so the antagonist of the Charleston church shooting is plagued by exposure to “radicalizing” content via the internet.

CNN, the UK Guardian and the New York Daily News appear to be the foremost media outlets shaping the Dylann Roof infected by “hate” meme initially preferred by the Southern Poverty Law Center. A cursory LexisNexis search for “‘Dylann Roof’ and hate” for the dates June 17 to June 21 yields 320 print articles and 197 broadcast transcripts since June 17.

Guardian — 25
NY Daily News — 21
LA Times — 12
McClatchy — 12
Wash Post — 12
NY Times — 9
USA Today — 4
NY Post — 4
Phil Inquirer — 4

CNN — 68
FoxNews — 13
MSNBC — 12
CBS New — 9
Canadian TV — 8
NPR — 8
NBC News — 5
ABC News 3

Another search for “‘Dylann Roof’ and terrorism OR terrorist” reveals many of the same venues emphasizing this theme, with 124 print article and 96 transcripts.

Guardian — 15
NY Daily News — 4
NY Times — 4
LA Times — 3
McClatchy Tribune — 3
Atlant Journ Const — 3
Wash Post — 2

CNN — 53
MSNBC — 12
FoxNews — 9
CBS New — 4
Canadian TV — 2
NPR — 1
NBC News — 0
ABC News 0

True to form, even before funeral arrangements could be made for the slain, the Obama administration and its allies had begun waving the bloody shirt for gun control. It may soon be doing so to impose fines on or outright censor websites that may “radicalize” impressionable minds in order to save us from ourselves.  The exercise of prior restraint of expression against any party regardless of their espoused and articulated views is fundamentally unconstitutional and antithetical to America’s core values.

Among other freedoms slowly but surely taken away since September 11, 2001, online speech and a free internet are in jeopardy as never before, to a significant degree because particularly in times of crisis much of the US public are too quick to allow the major corporate media and punditocracy to do their thinking for them.


Professor James F. Tracy is an Associate Professor of Media Studies at Florida Atlantic University. James Tracy’s work on media history, politics and culture has appeared in a wide variety of academic journals, edited volumes, and alternative news and opinion outlets. James is editor of Union for Democratic Communication’s Journal Democratic Communiqué and a contributor to Project Censored’s forthcoming publication Censored 2013: The Top Censored Stories and Media Analysis of 2011-2012. Additional writings and information are accessible at memoryholeblog.com.

Reaction To Charleston Church Shooting Fits Perfectly With Jade Helm Martial Law Agenda

dylann-storm-roof

We owe it to ourselves as truth seekers, concerned Americans and citizens to decode the meaning of the recent Charleston South Carolina Church shooting and see how the greater agenda fits in with the new world order plans. Just as globalist controllers won’t ever let a good problem go to waste, so it is with truth seekers. We should never let a good false flag shooting, staged violence or political “reaction” to this violence go to waste. Let’s take a proper close look at the reaction phase of the recent church shooting without analyzing the shooting itself. We’ll find here that by considering just the reaction phase, this will tell a huge story. It is then up to us to determine where this agenda is headed.

To consider the reaction phase of the recent shooting consider briefly the problem being presented:

1- White man

2- Gun owner

3- Confederate sympathizer

4- Lone wolf

5- Racist

Now here is the desired ‘reaction’ wanted by the controllers to each problem:

1- White man- Every white man is now dangerous because they are probably racist.

2- Gun owner- All gun owners and 2nd amendment defenders are dangerous because they might be the next crazed shooter.

3- Confederate sympathizer- Look out for anyone who sports the Confederate flag or speaks in ways that indicate they are not sympathetic toward tyranny, the Union, the federal government or if they support state sovereignty or resist top-down control by a federal government- all of these ideas are to be seen as possible signs of that person being the next crazed shooter.

4- Lone wolf- Anyone harboring anger or stand-alone disagreement with any group, religion or political idea might be the dangerous lone wolf the federal government has been warning you about.

5. Racist- The new racism is no longer an individual thing and it’s no longer a problem which has existed since before the birth of America. It now makes you a terrorist or the next mass shooter. That’s right, if you hear someone expressing racist ideologies (especially if they are white) that might indicate that they are about to kill a bunch of black people just for the heck of it. More importantly, because of the racism problem everyone should distrust anyone who is not the same color as they are because that other person might be a crazed shooter or someone looking to exact revenge on your race. Beware and be afraid!

These reactions are being fostered of course by government, politicians and the CIA’s mainstream media. Add to that the ongoing subliminal demonization of Constitution supporters and what we have is an America that is being set up for war. The war is two-fold- First there is the external foreign policy related march to world war 3, then there is the war within which is starting to resemble shades of the civil war. The Federalists are back in the form of the globalist, and anyone against the U.S. dollar abroad is the enemy and will be attacked by their terror tool ISIS. Anyone at home supporting state rights, individual rights or freedom from the globalist control freaks is now seen as no different than those who supported the Confederate army in the south and will be considered the domestic enemy. The globalist have their hands full in a 2 sided simultaneous war.

It should come as no surprise to anyone that throughout globalist scripted American history the Confederates have been demonized as “pro-slavery” by the Federalist to this day. They symbolized the resistance to tyranny, resistance to the north, to the federal government and resistance thus to today’s new world order. They represent the will and force of the states against the Union. If it weren’t for the fact that Jade Helm 15 is looming and that several states have spoken out against this U.S. military martial law exercise officially starting soon, we might be wondering why the mainstream media has gone out of its way to point out that alleged shooter Dylann Roof was photographed with a license plate sporting the Confederate flag. This is just another of many recent hints and subliminal suggestions that Jade Helm 15 is an ominous event in motion.

What we are seeing with the recent mass shooting is a very well coordinated and predictable reaction phase which should set off a red flag in the minds of every truth seeker who is familiar with this very often repeated government script.

The (mainstream media) reaction phase is so familiar to many of us that it almost feels as if there should be a criteria for automatically labeling a shooting a false flag without the need for any evidence in cases where the reaction phase and especially the predictable ‘solutions’ make it so blatantly obvious that the known agenda is at play.

In a world divided by those who believe in organized coordinated conspiracies (simple reality) and those who believe all events transpire by wild coincidences (mainstream media believing non-conspiracy/coincidence theorists) it is easy to harass and show up coincidence theorists just based on the repeated and predictable occurrences of these well coordinated conspiracies which always support stated and known agendas.

Repeatedly exploiting the cerebral capacities of coincidence theorists however rarely puts a dent into the globalist plans. Unfortunately the waking up process is both painful and slow. Most people are not prepared to accept the horrific reality of our world at an instance. Despite these information battles which we fill our days with while trying to expose the controllers, there is still the reality of their plans to deal with. The fact is that reality and fiction is now headed toward a massive collision of human consciousness. Many will die not knowing, many will die trying to fight it. Some will witness the truth and humanity will carry on with this new fund of knowledge about who we really are and where we are headed.

Truth versus lies, life versus death, coordinated conspiracies versus the blind belief in wild coincidences. It’s all unfolding now. The great hope is that enough of humanity will come together, as is already happening worldwide, and say no to the new world order, their staged and funded terrorism and their corrupt politicians who will have to be replaced one by one. We are now in a revolutionary period in every sense of the word.

The more important point I want to make is that the recent shooting should point everyone to the fact that Jade Helm 15 is upon us and here is what the controllers want and need:

1- A divided public

a. Whites versus blacks
b. Christians versus Muslims
c. Democrats versus Republicans
d. Men versus women
e. Gay versus straight and so on …

2- An obedient afraid public

3- An ignorant public easily influenced by mainstream media lies

4- A complacent public that watches TV and entertainment and never asks critical questions

If members of the public are obedient then they will more easily relinquish their guns and all their rights. An unarmed public is the perfect scenario for the controllers because they can do as they wish moving forward including mass genocide and depopulation and that is the reason for the recent gun control agenda revived with this latest shooting.

So as the control system is already putting out subliminal ads intended to criminalize those who support and defend the Constitution (see video below), let’s keep this latest shooting in mind because the reaction phase (and of course the proposed solutions) fits right into this agenda. The main purpose of Jade Helm 15 as stated by the U.S. military themselves is to “master the human domain” and this is all you need to know. To master the human domain one must first master and control their mind with fear, then one must disarm them. Intimidating Americans and forcing them to do things they don’t want to do- this is the main purpose of the Jade Helm 15 psyop.

Solutions

Arm yourself mentally with knowledge, understanding and courage to do what is right. Then peacefully, wisely but firmly reach out to others who don’t understand what is happening. Hold your local politicians accountable for their actions. Educate the military and those in position of power. Then be still and act with purpose not fear.  Look for the light at the end of the tunnel. Remain hopeful. Find your place in history. Read more history so you can understand the current days and more importantly the future. Decide what you believe in then live for that cause. Just remember, living and dying is the story of humanity. Everything that happens to us are but stories being told. Ask yourself, what is your role in the story?

Related video


Bernie Suarez is a revolutionary writer with a background in medicine, psychology, and information technology. He has written numerous articles over the years about freedom, government corruption and conspiracies, and solutions. A former host of the 9/11 Freefall radio show, Bernie is also the creator of the Truth and Art TV project where he shares articles and videos about issues that raise our consciousness and offer solutions to our current problems. His efforts are designed to encourage others to joyfully stand for truth, to expose government tactics of propaganda, fear and deception, and to address the psychology of dealing with the rising new world order. He is also a former U.S. Marine who believes it is our duty to stand for and defend the U.S. Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic. A peace activist, he believes information and awareness is the first step toward being free from enslavement from the globalist control system which now threatens humanity. He believes love conquers all fear and it is up to each and every one of us to manifest the solutions and the change that you want to see in this world, because doing this is the very thing that will ensure victory and restoration of the human race from the rising global enslavement system, and will offer hope to future generations.

Christiana Figueres Pushes New Globalist “Social Contract”

Christiana Figueres

(The Real Agenda) A popular dictate says that the only way to predict the future is by creating it, and that is exactly what powerful entities such as the United Nations and the groups that support it are doing right now.

The future is not coming, it is here and if the UN has its way, that future might be the most horrible nightmare anyone could ever dreamed about. In essence, it will like taking a trip back to the Dark Ages, except that the people who will be in the dark will be the masses, not the elite that is in command.

A lot of the details contained in the plans to shape the future to the elite’s liking circle around a fake environmental movement that if at any point in the past was true to ideals of saving the Earth, it has now been co-opted, bought and paid for by… you guessed it, the elite in power.

There is nothing mythical about the current paradigm of control under which we all live. There is a scientific power mad elite that is hell bent on depopulating the planet as fast as they can. Clearly, they do not tell us exactly that. They draw, paint and bring their plan to life in the form of fictional environmental issues, such as anthropogenic warming and more recently climate change, or ending inequality, or promoting social justice.

In reality, however, there is one single outcome they are focused on: prevent the development of societies below the equator and beyond the western civilization. In doing so, the elite and their minions effectively condemn those people to living in perpetual poverty and misery, which added to their plan to feed them genetically engineered food, and to prevent them from accessing the benefits of modern civilization, will ultimately end up killing them by the millions.

The latest figure head to express the United Nations intention to depopulate the planet through alleged environmental policies is the Executive Secretary of the UNFCC, Christiana Figueres. While addressing students at the University of California’s School of International Relations and Pacific Studies, she explained her thoughts about the need for a new social contract,

“You will write the social contract of this century. Contrary to the previous contracts, it will have to address global concerns just as much, or even more so, than national and local concerns. It will have to be a contract enriched by the integration of North and South, East and West, and deeply informed by the interaction between global challenges and national concerns. It will have to be a contract based more on collaboration than on competition. It will have to be a contract guided by the stars of solidarity and equality.”

According to most mainstream globalists, global needs are above national needs and laws, therefore, countries must surrender their sovereignty and leave aside the needs of their citizens to “collaborate” with the international community. It is also their belief that the planet must be seen and run as a single unit, with a centralized, powerful government composed by unelected officials who can dictate rules and directives to national bureaucracies.

Their plan includes erasing national borders and using cultural differences to inflame free societies until they collapse on their own footprint. Globalists of the kind of Figueres believe that a competitive market is unjust and that only a centralized government with the power to decide the destinies of all people will be in a position to govern over everyone else to perfection. In order to make their plan seem hopeful and harmless, globalists often equal the surrender of liberty and freedom to solidarity and equality.

Another mind game that globalists also like to play is to make it look as if the average Joe will have a say on how this world government entity will operate and that everyone’s suggestions and concerns will be taken into account.

“Through your decisions you will also determine the design of the impressive infrastructure of the twenty-first century, infrastructure that is almost unimaginable to us today. It will be built to transform the way we house, feed, employ and transport nine billion people despite growing climate uncertainties.”

Making a plan sound inclusive is one of the most successful techniques employed by the elite to get everyone on board. That is how the unsuspecting, dumbed down masses are still way too naive to understand what the real outcome is. After all, who could be against ending inequality or promoting social inclusion?

As we reported yesterday, the United Nations, although seemingly weak and ineffective, is slowly gobbling up power through its various partner organizations such as the World Health Organization, World Trade Organization, World Bank, International Monetary Fund and the multiple regional political and economic unions that now govern over nation-states, such as the European Union, the African Union and the Asian Union, to cite a few.

These organizations, by virtue of the power vested on them by their member states, are in complete control of very delicate aspects of human civilization such as health, nutrition, commerce, finances and of course environment.

According to Figueres, the 21st century’s measure of development will no longer be based on employment or income, but on “environmental sustainability and social welfare”. That is, people will be subjects of the global government and as such will be limited in what they can do, where they can go, what they can eat, and anything that people do will be based on a program of complete dependence on government programs. Simply put, people who are not murdered by the UN’s extremist environmental policies will be government slaves.

Figueres later attempted to call the mass of students to action while deviating them from one of the most important reasons to exist: their individuality.

“… I remind you that you are not only individuals, you are part of the larger society, one in the midst of major transformation itself. You have the power to create your own personal reality, but you also have the power – in fact the obligation – to create the society you wish to live in.”

The truth could not be more different than what Figueres pointed out in her speech. Humanity has been socially, economically and environmentally engineered for decades now, and the elite is not keen about yielding a single inch in their mad search for total power.

The present time is the clearest example of their failure to bring about the bright future that Figueres mentioned in her speech. The same elite has been in power for over a hundred years, yet, its members have been incapable, I say unwilling, of offering anything better to multiple generations than a state of perpetual war, poverty, social and cultural balkanization and environmental destruction.

What could make anyone think that these same people are now ready to deliver us from the evils they have been cooking up in the last century? In fact, their documents and books say quite the oposite. What the elite wants is to have complete control over every resource on the planet and to establish a global scientific dictatorship and they are well underway to achieving the future they envisioned.


Luis R. Miranda is an award-winning journalist and the founder and editor-in-chief at The Real Agenda. His career spans over 18 years and almost every form of news media. His articles include subjects such as environmentalism, Agenda 21, climate change, geopolitics, globalisation, health, vaccines, food safety, corporate control of governments, immigration and banking cartels, among others. Luis has worked as a news reporter, on-air personality for Live and Live-to-tape news programs. He has also worked as a script writer, producer and co-producer on broadcast news. Read more about Luis.

Humanity Adapting New Resistance To Government Lies For Self-Survival

government

Throughout nature it is well known that species will experience changes in its DNA and adaptations in its physical expression and behavior solely for the purposes of surviving in its environment. There are numerous examples in nature of species genetically and physically adapting to its environment for survival reasons. So its not a far-fetched suggestion that humanity itself may now be experiencing a physiological mental and cerebral transformation which is changing its behavioral pattern and environmental response to the phenomenon of government. That’s right, as humans we have an obligation to think critically and objectively when considering the plight of humanity as it struggles in these modern days against the new world order and the human control system. It is up to us to consider the objective expression of this battle for freedom against the oppressive and defective component of humanity known as government.

Whether you understand it or not, those that wish to control you are a parasite on the species. Their infective process is carried out by thought signals within other concurring members of the species. These thought signals of control, rules, laws, policing, and legal system of enslavement perpetuates itself within the species and is the very system that we know as the controlling governmental system. It seeks to simply control and enslave others. There is really no other purpose for its existence. It generates the mental signals needed to perpetuate the control system of enslavement to take away your individual freedom and your wealth and money. It does all of this by the system of rules we logically understand today as government.

This same governmental system is a sophisticated apparatus. It didn’t just come about by any means. This concept of government it turns out is the very burden of life that ensures that life often is a struggle, is stress filled or not enjoyable. This control system is a challenge humanity has been trying to figure out for centuries. Anyone can read ancient history and see the exact same struggle humanity was in back then. It is not difficult to see the parallels throughout history on how the history of the struggle for freedom is arguably the very history of humanity.

Unfortunately today, all of history is often taught to children from the point of view of the controllers. The concept of freedom is normally hidden from human consciousness from the start with the hope and intention that the human being will never truly comprehend what it means to be truly free. The control system’s logic instilled from youth is that life is what you are told it is by the control system and you are to obey. We are taught that freedom from controlling governments is not realistic, not possible and not even part of human history.

Realization and awareness

However, with the advent of the information age and the subsequent advancement in human knowledge awareness and human consciousness many within the species (those who are awakened) are realizing that the sky is the limit. Humanity is realizing that truth itself is realized not expressed to you by a voice on TV or a billboard. Awakened humanity is realizing that we are what we believe we can be. The rules of old are quickly dissolving before our eyes even as the control system marches on with control tactics to keep the masses enslaved.

Reality and fiction are on a collision course. The controllers are intending to force their fiction on humanity even if it means going violent. Today, this forceful violence designed to intimidate and push their agenda is known by many names today including ‘false flags’. These false flags are now the norm in the eyes of those who are awakened and spontaneous coincidences in the eyes of those still asleep in the matrix of lies.

This epic moment in human consciousness is leading to something big. What we are now seeing is a rash of staged government violent operations, staged false flag violence and everyday lies from the control system’s mainstream media. As awakened humanity fights off a now weak storm of verbal attacks (“conspiracy theorists”) designed to discredit those awakened, it is primed to usher in a new era which is already underway.

The new era of human consciousness has many features to it. It’s already in progress and it’s all around us even though most people don’t realize it. Humanity is mentally advancing and adapting very comfortably to government lies and propaganda. Yes, that’s right! I believe humanity is adapting so well to government lies and propaganda that the control system is desperate to do whatever it has to do to control, fool and convince those that are still asleep that the dream they are in is still real. They are throwing the kitchen sink at this prospect. The dream of controlling humanity is after all a dream to the controllers. The same way you and I have dreams of success and happiness is the same way the controller have dreams of controlling. Like any member of the species, we (they) are wired to not give up on our (their) dreams.

This functional commonality within humanity is a very important reality we must all keep in mind. The same tenacity that we have for fighting for freedom and truth is the tenacity the controllers have for fighting for enslavement and lies.

Rendering the control system powerless

I believe our similarities within the species is something that is allowing the species as a whole to adapt to the problematic control system. This diseased portion of humanity known as the control system is losing its mass influence and the loss of influence is growing and becoming more pronounced with every day that goes by.

For example, as I’ve discussed in the past, more than ever we are now seeing repeated government lies, propaganda, entire operations including false flags and fake terror operations all being pushed on the masses at all-time rates, all the while a growing significant percentage of the human population is not even blinking at these events. It’s as if these false flag shootings, lies, propaganda and staged terror is not even happening. The anxiety it’s supposed to produce is not there and the lies they tell are not believed. Awakened humanity is increasingly seeing government and its lying apparatus as an irrelevant part of life.

We all know the control system is very capable of violence. Yes, they will do anything they can to put every single one of us in a cage (jail, prison) or to take away are money (taxes). Yes they will write thousands of laws to make it easier and easier to attack your freedom and steal your money. And yes they will continue to attack your mind with staged fear (terrorism, false flags and engineered natural events). Awakened humanity is aware of what its dealing with and it is aware of its individual limitations so it tolerates what it sees, quietly marches on ignoring the fear and quietly awaits the moment when all the cards will fall apart for the control system.

Human progress

Many who are fully awakened realize that essentially all human progress occurs slowly and incrementally. That is the reason why we all still have associates, friends and family who are still asleep in the matrix of lies. We understand its a slow process. It’s the process of human mental, spiritual, and conscious evolution that we are seeing in motion in real-time. Its happening right now and it’s very real.

I firmly believe humanity is actually adapting to the problem of government. Advanced humanity sees the problem and now it is fully understanding what it’s dealing with. This new and evolving understanding is giving way to the evolutionary process of overcoming government. Humanity is intrinsically changing how it thinks in response to the problem of government. Just think for a moment how just a century ago no one had any clue what a false flag was. Can you imagine that?

Here we are in the first quarter of the 21st century and humanity’s mentality is advancing beyond its years even as a huge segment is still stuck on the paradigm of entertainment allowing celebrities, Hollywood and TV to influence their perception of the world. Advanced humanity nonetheless is moving forward confidently. Those who are awakened cannot be un-awakened. The awakening process is a one way street. It’s a process that moves forward not backwards. Mathematically speaking there will be more (not less) awakened people on earth tomorrow than yesterday, and so on.

All of these factors mentioned put together define the evolution of humanity but not in the sense taught to children in public schools. This is the true and real evolution of the human thought process which includes it’s new awareness of itself, its new awareness of freedom, and full awareness of its enslavement to government and how it employs its current propaganda control system.

I believe this awareness alone is all that is needed for humanity to guarantee victory over the control system. It may sound crazy and exaggerated but this awareness alone will activate the spirit of freedom deep inside the minds of humans and it will activate the creativity in humanity to do whatever it takes to resist the control system. This resistance, when exercised as a mass scale will deal a blow to the control system in ways we can’t imagine.

So no one should be surprised that the control system will soon be using the U.S. military to practice intimidating Americans and pulling them out of their apartments (Jade Helm 15 operation officially starting soon). That’s because deep down the control system knows what it is up against. It’s up against a sophisticated species that is aware, is watching, is vigilant, loves freedom and most important, is evolving mentally. This new adaptation by the species to the problem of government will ultimately be the greatest threat to the control system. The controllers are hoping to overcome this by spreading fear. They know however, that if they fail to spread their fear its game over. Are you ready? Will you be ready when things get much worse? Is the greater picture finally coming together?


Bernie Suarez is a revolutionary writer with a background in medicine, psychology, and information technology. He has written numerous articles over the years about freedom, government corruption and conspiracies, and solutions. A former host of the 9/11 Freefall radio show, Bernie is also the creator of the Truth and Art TV project where he shares articles and videos about issues that raise our consciousness and offer solutions to our current problems. His efforts are designed to encourage others to joyfully stand for truth, to expose government tactics of propaganda, fear and deception, and to address the psychology of dealing with the rising new world order. He is also a former U.S. Marine who believes it is our duty to stand for and defend the U.S. Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic. A peace activist, he believes information and awareness is the first step toward being free from enslavement from the globalist control system which now threatens humanity. He believes love conquers all fear and it is up to each and every one of us to manifest the solutions and the change that you want to see in this world, because doing this is the very thing that will ensure victory and restoration of the human race from the rising global enslavement system, and will offer hope to future generations.

Panel Of “Experts” Proposes A Stronger United Nations

united nations

Madeleine Albright and Ibrahim Gambari are two of the people who say that the UN needs to be “renovated” and “modernized” in order to remain strong and relevant.

The United Nations is a globalist organization born out of the geopolitical debris left after World War II as well as as a result of the global elite’s desire to exercise complete control over the population.

Its predecesor, the League of Nations, was the start of what later became a network of influential globalist supranational organizations whose legitimacy is more than questionable given the poor results they’ve produced in favor of the people of the world.

These organizations include the UN itself, a body dominated by the winners of WW II who saw in the end of the war an opportunity to shape the future to their liking. Each of those members was charged with taking on an issue that the globalists understood as a challenge, while at the same time collaborating with each other on regional and global matters. One of those issues, perhaps the most important, is Eugenics.

Globalists intend to reduce and keep the world’s population at less than 1 billion people. Recently, a representative of the Vatican and the governor of Caliornia expressed their desire to depopulate the planet and implement a global court that would enforce an “Earth Constitution” and that would be part of their Global Government.

Despite being seen as an organization that represents the interests of the masses, the UN is actually a politically castrated body, whose decisions are for the most part non-binding. Only that which is decided by the members of the Security Council, formed by the strongest political and military forces of the planet, is adopted as official UN policy, although it does not always ends up being respected or followed.

The insignificance of the UN is not a coincidence. The UN was never intended to be a global body where all of its members had equal representation, or where countries could deal with their national or regional affairs. Up until today, the UN is a sterile forum where national representatives go to give speeches that are almost immediately forgotten.

Do not let the UN’s sterility and political castration deceive you, though. Right now, the UN is a shell whose interior is just about to be stuffed with the power and force that its creators always intended it to have.

Recently, the United Nations served as a forum for globalist politicians and their representatives to propose the massive confiscation of firearms in the United States, a plan that has been in the works for decades. If approved and adopted, this proposal would forcibly take the American people’s constitutional right to own guns.

More detailed versions of plans such as the UN Arms Treaty, intend to make the United Nations the sole military power on the planet, which would require countries to surrender their weapons, or to transfer their use to the hands of a group of unelected politicians at the UN.

A similar proposal was presented in political circles regarding internet management. People at the UN and national representatives at G7 countries are working side by side to give the UN complete control over internet communications in the same way that others proposed surrendering military equipment.

A third and perhaps the most important attempt by globalists to complete their plan of total control over humanity is the environmental agenda of the United Nations. Two documents referring to the imposition of limits to development and individual liberty have been issued by the UN in the last few decades. The 1992 United Nations Biodiversity Assessment which was later complemented with the Agenda 21 plan are clear examples of how those behind the UN seek complete control over people and resources.

Now, a panel of experts that includes former United States Secretary of State, Madeleine Albright and Ibrahim Gambari, former Nigerian Minister of Foreign Affairs, is advancing a proposal to finally “renovate” and “modernize” the United Nations, which in practice would mean giving the UN total power over communications, environmental issues and military affairs, among others.

As the United Nations’ 70th anniversary approaches, a so-called independent committee of 14 experts has prepared a report with what they call ambitious recommendations to “reform the world’s most famous intergovernmental body”.

Gathered around the Commission on Global Security, Justice and Governance sponsored by the Hague Institute for Global Justice and the American study center Stimson the proposed change covers three main areas: climate, cybercrime and international conflicts, the very same issues where the UN has attempted to force itself on sovereign nations.

“The UN is not prepared to face the current threats, which are changing. If you do not want to risk prolonging global crises, it should be renewed,” says the study.

The report isued by this group was titled “Facing the crisis of global governance”, and it was presented Tuesday at the Peace Palace, the home of the International Court of the UN.

Directed by Madeleine Albright and Ibrahim Gambari, the organization warns about the need to make decisions that go “beyond national borders and that aim to reach the world of business and civil society, as well as other institutions of global governance, to better address the challenges of state conflicts, climate change and the hyper-connected economy. “

The proposed changes involve, among other things, modernizing international peacekeeping and mediation.

According to the authors, it is necessary to create a new generation of mediators, with a higher proportion of women, to prevent conflicts and maintain peace.

The report makes use of a popular technique of mass manipulation, which makes it appear as if the proposed changes are politically correct, by impling that including more women and more members of minority groups is the key to making the plan succeed.

“Also, it is vital to have enough civil, military and police personnel to meet the tasks of peace missions themselves, involve women to back reconstruction process, and coordinate all UN agencies to prevent atrocities is considered indispensable.”

On the fake issue of climate doomsday, the report argues that “The climate is another pillar of the suggested reforms, and collaboration with the private sector, creating green technology licensing and review of experiments conducted on “atmospheric changes” is requested.”

The so-called experts use the same type of language as the UN’s IPCC, the political body in charge of making up and implementing scientific polic. “You also need to set a target for climate adaptation. Something like the barrier of two degrees Celsius warming, recommended to contain the greenhouse effect.”

The study presented by former political figures also took a shot at economics and financial issues. “Given the inevitable consequences of the vagaries of the world economy, the study aims to “create an additional G20 (G20 +) for true cooperation avoid financial crisis.”

The globalists also want to centralize control of the internet by officializing the existence of internet police. “On cybercrime, another widespread phenomenon, it appears to be necessary the creation of a global network of centers to combat it, with the help of Interpol.

A report of this nature would not be complete without making reference to the Security Council in its current composition.

As we said before, this body is composed y five permanent members -Russia, Britain, China, France and the United States- with veto power who make their own decisions on all sorts of global affairs. According to the report, it is preferable to “provide opportunities to other countries, regional organizations and NGOs, as well as local authorities, to contribute to the forging and maintenance of peace.” This same type of speech has presented at the beginning of negoatiations on climate, but in truth participants were and still are only allowed to talk about a pre-established agenda set by the UN.

“At the same time, we should strengthen the Council’s legitimacy and restrict the right of veto,” concludes the report.

The proposals contained in the study will be presented next September at the UN during the 70th anniversary commemorative summit in New York.


Luis R. Miranda is an award-winning journalist and the founder and editor-in-chief at The Real Agenda. His career spans over 18 years and almost every form of news media. His articles include subjects such as environmentalism, Agenda 21, climate change, geopolitics, globalisation, health, vaccines, food safety, corporate control of governments, immigration and banking cartels, among others. Luis has worked as a news reporter, on-air personality for Live and Live-to-tape news programs. He has also worked as a script writer, producer and co-producer on broadcast news. Read more about Luis.

Pope Francis Calls For A New Global Political Authority To Save Humanity

pope francis

Pope Francis says that global warming is a fact and that a new global political authority is necessary in order to save humanity from utter disaster.  The new encyclical that was scheduled to be released on Thursday was leaked, and it is being reported that this new global political authority that Pope Francis envisions would be in charge of “the reduction of pollution and the development of poor countries and regions”.  The funny thing is that this sounds very much in line with the new sustainable development agenda that is going to be launched at the United Nations in September.  This radical new agenda is already being called “Agenda 21 on steroids” because it goes so much farther than Agenda 21 ever did.  The new UN agenda does not just address the environment – it also addresses issues such as poverty, agriculture, education and gender equality.  It is essentially a blueprint for governing the entire planet, and that sounds very much like what Pope Francis also wants.  In fact, Pope Francis is going to give the speech that kicks off the UN conference in September where this new sustainable agenda will be launched.  For some reason, this Pope has decided to make the fight against climate change the central pillar of his papacy, and he is working very hard to unite as much of humanity as possible to get behind that effort.

It is not an accident that this new encyclical is coming out now.  An article from the Guardian even states that the release was intended “to have maximum public impact” prior to the Pope’s major speech at the UN in September…

The rare encyclical, called “Laudato Sii”, or “Praised Be”, has been timed to have maximum public impact ahead of the pope’s meeting with Barack Obama and his address to the US Congress and the UN general assembly in September.

It is also intended to improve the prospect of a strong new UN global agreement to cut climate emissions. By adding a moral dimension to the well-rehearsed scientific arguments, Francis hopes to raise the ambition of countries above their own self-interest to secure a strong deal in a crucial climate summit in Paris in November.

Much of the encyclical is not that surprising.  But what is raising eyebrows is the Pope’s call for a new global political authority.  Here is more from the Guardian

Pope Francis will this week call for changes in lifestyles and energy consumption to avert the “unprecedented destruction of the ecosystem” before the end of this century, according to a leaked draft of a papal encyclical. In a document released by an Italian magazine on Monday, the pontiff will warn that failure to act would have “grave consequences for all of us”.

Francis also called for a new global political authority tasked with “tackling … the reduction of pollution and the development of poor countries and regions”. His appeal echoed that of his predecessor, pope Benedict XVI, who in a 2009 encyclical proposed a kind of super-UN to deal with the world’s economic problems and injustices.

What is even more alarming is who will be on the stage with the Pope when this encyclical is formally released. John Schellnhuber is a German professor that has some very radical views on climate change.  For instance, he believes that our planet is overpopulated by at least six billion people

Professor John Schellnhuber has been chosen as a speaker for the Vatican’s rolling out of a Papal document on climate change. He’s the professor who previously said the planet is overpopulated by at least six billion people. Now, the Vatican is giving him a platform which many expect will result in an official Church declaration in support of radical depopulation in the name of “climate science.”

And Schellnhuber also happens to believe that we need a new global political authority.  If he had his way, there would be an “Earth Constitution”, a “Global Council” directly elected by the people of the planet, and a “Planetary Court” that would be above all other courts on the globe.  The following is an excerpt from a very disturbing piece that he authored

Let me conclude this short contribution with a daydream about those key institutions that could bring about a sophisticated — and therefore more appropriate — version of the conventional “world government” notion. Global democracy might be organized around three core activities, namely (i) an Earth Constitution; (ii) a Global Council; and (iii) a Planetary Court. I cannot discuss these institutions in any detail here, but I would like to indicate at least that:

– the Earth Constitution would transcend the UN Charter and identify those first principles guiding humanity in its quest for freedom, dignity, security and sustainability;

– the Global Council would be an assembly of individuals elected directly by all people on Earth, where eligibility should be not constrained by geographical, religious, or cultural quotas; and

– the Planetary Court would be a transnational legal body open to appeals from everybody, especially with respect to violations of the Earth Constitution.

Does the Pope want something similar?

It is quite telling that Schellnhuber was invited to stand with the Pope as this major encyclical is released to the world.  Did Schellnhuber play a role in drafting it?  Has he been advising the Pope on these matters?  Does the Pope share his vision of the future?

And does the Pope share Schellnhuber’s belief that our planet is currently overpopulated by six billion people?  If so, how would the Pope solve that “problem”?

Without a doubt, most of those that make up the “global elite” would love to see the number of people on earth decline precipitously.  This is something that I covered in my previous article entitled “46 Population Control Quotes That Show How Badly The Elite Want To Wipe Us All Out“.  Of course the Pope is not going to publicly advocate for getting rid of six billion people, but clearly he is extremely concerned about the impact that all of us are having on this planet.

The funny thing is that the earth is not even warming.  In fact, there has been no sign of global warming at all for the past ten years

Over the years the government and the scientific community have largely stood their ground when it comes to climate change. They’ve been adamant in their assertion that the planet is gradually warming due to human activity, and that we all need to do our part to stop climate change. However, the data provided by the scientific community doesn’t always jibe with their claims.

At least, that seems to be the case with the data coming out of NOAA’s climate monitoring stations. They have a series of 114 stations across all 50 states, which is known as the US Climate Reference Network. For the past 10 years they’ve shown no sign of global warming. In fact, there’s been a very slight cooling in temperatures across the US.

But at this point, most of the world has bought into the propaganda.  In most industrialized nations, a solid majority of the population actually believes that climate change is the greatest threat that humanity currently faces.

And since just about all forms of human activity produce “carbon emissions” or affect the environment in some way, it gives control freaks that dream of global government a good excuse to grab more power.  They will always say that it is about “saving humanity” or “saving the planet”, but ultimately everything that they are trying to accomplish would mean more power in their hands.

So what do you think that the Pope is up to?  And do you think that it is a good thing or a bad thing?

Please feel free to share your opinion by posting a comment below…


Michael T. Snyder is a graduate of the McIntire School of Commerce at the University of Virginia and has a law degree and an LLM from the University of Florida Law School. He is an attorney that has worked for some of the largest and most prominent law firms in Washington D.C. and who now spends his time researching and writing and trying to wake the American people up. You can follow his work on The Economic Collapse blog, End of the American Dream and The Truth Wins. His new novel entitled “The Beginning Of The End” is now available on Amazon.com.