See below the Skeptics’ Case Guide to illustrate the fraud of climate change and/or global warming, as explained by the establishment media and political whores. No politics, just facts.
In just 12 minutes an analysis of the main predictions of the climate models against the best and latest data demonstrates that the climate models got all their major predictions wrong.
Why? Because of the only aspect of the debate that the main stream media and the political whores do not mention when discussing climate: The Feedbacks.
“Every serious skeptical scientist has been consistently saying essentially the same thing for over 20 years, yet most people have never heard the message. Here it is, put simply enough for any lay reader willing to pay attention…”, remembers Dr. David M.W. Evans, a mathematician and engineer, with six university degrees including a PhD from Stanford University in electrical engineering.
According to Dr. Evans, “the evidence supporting the idea that CO2 emissions were the main cause of global warming reversed itself from 1998 to 2006″, causing him to go from being a warmist to a skeptic.
Please pause as needed.
As you have now learned, both scientists and skeptics agree about the direct effects of CO2 emissions. What they do not agree on are the effects of The Feedbacks, which as the data shows do not do what the IPCC climate models say. This means that the supposed effects of CO2 emissions, if the best and latest data is taken into account, must be cut by two thirds in order to reflect reality.
If you found this analysis of climate model predictions versus real data helpful, please make sure to pass it around to people who still do not understand it.
Special thanks to Stephan Molyneux from Freedomain Radio and Dr. David M.W. Evans.
Read Dr. Evans’ report “The Skeptic’s Case” on the Ludwig von Mises Institute website.