Is “Controlled Opposition” The New Controlled Opposition?

Is "Controlled Opposition" The New Controlled Opposition? | wolf-in-sheeps-clothing-460x282 | Government Government Control Propaganda Sleuth Journal Society

In his 2008 paper to tackle what he called the problem of “conspiracy theories”, Obama administration eventual Informational Czar Cass Sunstein specifically called for government to cognitively infiltrate the truth movement or as he called it “extremist groups”. In his co-written paper outlining his plan to disrupt the truth movement Sunstein writes:

“We suggest a distinctive tactic for breaking up the hard core of extremists who supply conspiracy theories: cognitive infiltration of extremist groups, whereby government agents or their allies (acting either virtually or in real space, and either openly or anonymously) will undermine the crippled epistemology of believers by planting doubts about the theories and stylized facts that circulate within such groups, thereby introducing beneficial cognitive diversity.”

Is "Controlled Opposition" The New Controlled Opposition? | cognitive-infiltration-sunstein-460x161 | Government Government Control Propaganda Sleuth Journal Society

Clearly according to Sunstein, the idea was to hire trolls to post comments on websites and social media that simply introduce another angle on the same topic. Like a “new” truth movement within the truth movement. From the stand point of those who are completely awakened to the new world order plans, I ask readers to sit back and meditate and think to yourself what this would look like to the average truth seeker. How would we witness and perceive this cognitive infiltration in real-time in our own lives?

I considered this question several years ago when I heard of Sunstein’s paper and I postulated that this would manifest itself as a post-2008 wave of “new truth” trickling throughout alternative media, blog sites, and throughout the net all being circulated amongst truthers or truth seekers. These new truths, which would be served as new pieces of information intended as add-ons or replacement theories to things we already know and things that are proven, would circulate in documentaries and eventually be repeated by many in the movement.

These “new” pieces of information, I postulated, would also come in the form of “new” documentaries that raise “new” issues and “new” angles on otherwise old well established narratives regarding well-tackled false flags (think 9/11). Other examples of these “new truths”, I imagined, would come in the form of “new” revelations about other perceived leaders in the movement. Some typical examples of these new revelations I thought might be pushed as such: “did you hear about so and so? I hear that person is a definite CIA operative” or “people are saying that person is controlled opposition” or “notice that person is always saying this or never says that? This is proof they are controlled opposition”. On the surface however, these people accused of being “controlled opposition” would have a rather lengthy resume of exposing the global elite and the new world order. Nevertheless these individuals would be cast as traitors, deceivers, and definite “controlled opposition” fake operatives working on a deeper agenda. Here’s the catch, whether these individuals (almost all the “leaders” known in the truth movement) are ACTUALLY in fact in some way acting as “controlled opposition” or not, would ultimately not matter to the controllers who planned this out. The only thing that would matter to the controllers (Intelligence operatives) implementing their long term strategies of cognitive infiltration against the truth movement as a whole is that these ideas would eventually circulate far and deep enough that many would believe them. This “doubt” would thus give rise to Cass Sunstein’s “cognitive diversity” exactly as planned.

My speculations a few years back, I now believe were very accurate. Again, here’s the catch- exposing this overly anticipated controlled opposition within the truth movement, admittedly designed to introduce “beneficial cognitive diversity” in the exact words of Sunstein, itself was designed to generate division within the truth movement. Why and how? Because these “cognitive diversities” are not just innocent diversities, they are (by design) cognitive commitments that we make. People watch a documentary and they commit not only their feelings to the new belief, but their identity as well. So what is the big deal? People deeply own their identities and they are not very quick to give it away (IE change, exchange their beliefs or admit they believed wrong). This ownership of their belief and identity then becomes the very vehicle by which Sunstein’s projected plan for cognitive infiltration of the truth movement “extremists” was able to be effective.

Understanding controlled opposition

Most truth seekers have heard about the Cass Sunstein paper and perhaps put some thought into it, but did you really think the cognitive infiltration would be easy to identify? Did you really think it was going to come with welcome signs, flashing lights and bells ringing for everyone to hear and see? Not a chance, for then it wouldn’t be “infiltration”.

Dear truth seekers, some of you have been duped like a magician doing a card trick with quick hands. The controllers needed only to encourage, trigger, release, tweak, fund, sponsor, produce, and or put out themselves some fresh new ideas within the movement to create mini-camps of mental (psychological) commitments. These commitments would morph into “new” belief camps within the truth movement. Given enough time, the truth movement would be divided into various sectors, just as planned.

None of this should surprise as we’ve seen these divisions in both political and religious circles over the years. In fact, this is part of who we are as humans. I believe Sunstein and Intelligence saw the creation of factions within the Truth Movement not so much as something that had to be engineered from scratch but more like something that had to be allowed to happen naturally. The government needed only to encourage the division. This is easily done with the introduction of new information. Perhaps you didn’t realize it was that easy.

Remember, when you take a stand against U.S. government corruption you are taking a stand against those who created Operation Chaos, MK ULTRA, Operation Northwood and many other nefarious psychological and deceptive clandestine plans against its own people. Know therefore who your opponent is, and check yourself to see that you are fully (psychologically) armed to stand against this skillful enemy. Know what it is you don’t know and listen carefully to those who have led the way in the truth movement early after 9/11 and before that. Carefully challenge every new theory that has come along after 2008 (following Sunstein’s paper) and ask yourself, could this whole idea be part of the plan for orchestrated “cognitive diversities” within the truth movement?

If you honestly identify changes in the message of a person (as I certainly do) try hard to attack that particular subject instead of the entire person as we all tend to do. Example- Instead of saying, “that person is a CIA operative” or “controlled opposition” (which the person may in fact be), realizing that this itself is part of the trap, moving forward perhaps it’s better to say something like- ‘I like this person’s previous work overall, however, I’m not buying into his/her position on this particular topic’.

You are probably thinking- ‘are you kidding me? I’m not going to say that’. Here’s why you should phrase your opposition to focus on an individual topic instead of killing the entire messenger and labeling them CIA operatives and deceivers. First, the people and trolls perpetuating these ideas are very likely paid trolls and those they lure into their agenda. It’s time to stop underestimating the enemy. Second, easing off the messenger and attacking the message allows new truth seekers to still appreciate a person’s previous work instead of throwing the messenger out all together. Third, it reaffirms to yourself and to others around you that the truth movement is not about following leaders, it’s about BEING the leader. As leaders we then assert that we appreciate whatever truth is asserted by someone realizing full well that we are not looking for perfect leaders to lead us because we realize that we ourselves are all leaders. If someone is wrong on a topic, call them out and show them where they are wrong instead of resorting to the knee jerk “controlled opposition” accusation.

The primitive ‘follow the leader’ mentality is essential for the success of the new world order and their deceptive Intelligence campaigns to cognitively infiltrate the movement. The last thing they want is as movement that allows for variability in views but that sticks firmly to its opposition to the global elite criminals. The last thing they want is for people to realize that practically anyone in the truth movement including yours truly can be perceived and accused of being “controlled opposition”. Think of it, who’s NOT “controlled opposition” in some way??

How about in terms of truth content? Can you think of any theories which have been raised with new documentaries or books and presented as new discoveries to what had already been proven and generically agreed as truths within certain movements? Have you seen the debates going back and forth on blog sites and wonder what’s the point? Do you see heated discussions that ultimately don’t get us any closer to justice, but in fact may repel even more people away from the topic? Do you observe truth seekers making strong arguments that even though they may have a moral fundamental value or be based on honest opinion, the techniques being used are known for repelling others and derailing the reach of the message? Have you wondered why someone would resort to these questionable hard tactics to promote what they feel is true when the results of their actions are generally counterproductive? Have you ever considered this could be Cass Sunstein’s plan in full motion? It is!

As eluded to earlier, without a doubt the primary goal (as clearly stated by Sunstein) was to leave truth seekers confused about who to follow and who to believe. This sets the stage perfectly for infiltration and division. We all have an obligation to be vigilant and to defend the movement itself from deliberate division.

Overcoming our own humanity

Let us defeat Sunstein at his own stated game by accepting those who have done extensive work to raise awareness of the new world order. Let us stop following leaders and stick to truth. Let the accused disinformation agents fizzle away as you become the leader. Rally people around you but don’t make your rally all about attacking others in the movement, save it for exposing the mainstream media. Let us support the ideas that people share that resonate with us and stop expecting others to agree with every single thing we believe. Let us carefully pick out those topics that we all agree are government hoaxes and stick to our fundamental beliefs.

Start to realize now that we are all very susceptible to being impressed upon. We all have our views and those views are strong. We all must find a way of identifying and focusing on fighting the common enemy instead of fighting ourselves. Sunstein’s goals could not have succeeded unless many of us felt personally responsible of “saving” the truth movement from deception, even as I’m doing here. It’s important to realize however, that it is in our nature to see things differently and division within a group is not very difficult to create. Let us realize humans fool easily and we are an easy species to divide. Our solutions therefore should be planned with this human susceptibility in mind.

Interestingly, and for the sake of completeness, in his paper outlining his cognitive attack on the truth movement, Sunstein goes out of his way to defend the following theories which should raise a major red flag with every truth seeker out there. I want to thank deceptive mastermind Sunstein for tossing out these topics which I take as a confirmation that I should never agree with you and the United States government on these topics. Sunstein specifically calls for the banning of the following “conspiracy theories” (HINT):

· “The theory of global warming is a deliberate fraud.”
·  “The view that the Central Intelligence Agency was responsible for the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.”
·  “The 1996 crash of TWA flight 800 was caused by a U.S. military missile.”
·  “The Trilateral Commission is responsible for important movements of the international economy.”
·  “That Martin Luther King Jr. was killed by federal agents.”
·  “The moon landing was staged and never actually occurred.”

These are just a handful of the many state sponsored terror conspiracies and lies Sunstein felt needed to be suppressed.

United we stand

Clearly the last thing Sunstein and the current administration want is a cohesive truth movement that is not moved by a few differences. Clearly they need a truth movement where every member in the movement is looking to sniff out any tiny issue that the speaker, radio host, writer or blogger posts that might be wrong or incorrect. That is the tidbit they are looking for in order to create the much needed division? It goes back to the old saying: “United we stand, divided we fall”.

It is no secret now that this single lesson can and will defeat the globalist. The CIA online trolls will read this article and immediately go to work with attacks to create division. When that happens, all truth seekers should see the signs of cognitive infiltration for themselves. Believe your eyes. Learn to recognize truth when you see it. Know and understand how the enemy thinks, then practice beating them at their own game.

Ultimately, you’ll find that this game is not so difficult. You have to take a chance at sounding crazy to get at the heart of their strategy. I repeat, their number one strategy is (as clearly stated by Sunstein) to divide the truth movement by introducing alternative views about the same proven topics. These alternative views then serve as the perfect tools to split the movement into different camps. The division that these belief camps offer is the very “diversity” Sunstein had predicted.

Ever wonder why the truth movement as a whole has difficulties organizing national events? Or why it has poor fundamental organization? Perhaps the real reason is this core “diversity” in views. This “diversity” has been implemented on many levels and in many ways, some of which I’ve addressed here.

To consider how the Sunstein plan has been applied specifically to the 9/11 truth movement watch the accompanying (likely controversial but very true) related video linked below. Ultimately, the intention of all this work is to finally bring truth seekers together in a special way.

Why is this important? Because the globalist are moving extremely quick and we are living in very dangerous and unpredictable times. As many of us know, all forms of freedom and free speech are now blatantly under attack as seen by the recent France authorities mass arrest of individuals for expression of free speech that can be consider “supporting terrorism“. The shocking developments following the Charlie Hebdo false flag are an indicator that human freedom and liberty is in serious trouble if we don’t act now.

Resort to common enemies

Now is the time to put aside our differences and instead of looking for that perfect truth leader that is NOT “controlled opposition”, let’s just look to focus on our common enemy, and that is the globalist terrorists. They really are the true enemies of freedom and if truth leader X is CIA then let him/her be CIA. Get over it. Perhaps that leader is CIA but they are fighting with us for the most part and we need all the bodies we can get to fight this global monster known as the new world order. Stop worrying that we WILL be fooled later or that we are being set up to be fooled. Remember the saying? You shall know the truth and the truth will set you free- Do we really believe that truth has its own power? What if we are all vigilant? Are you really going to worry about how to “save” the truth movement or will you become focused on the common enemy?

Planning counter-resistance

Don’t wait ’till it’s too late to realize that the true power we have is in our numbers. Don’t wait ’till it’s too late to realize that had we gotten together and taken a stand together against our common enemies, we would’ve won. Let’s not learn this lesson the hard way. The CIA and Mossad knows that a divided truth movement is their ticket to victory. Why would you give them this victory? Cass Sunstein understands this blindly and he didn’t hesitate to give his plan away knowing still that it would work.

Will you act on this exposed plan? Or will you keep dancing to the beat of the same drums of division where everyone is “controlled opposition” and thus not to be trusted? I’m calling out the true controlled opposition, which is identified as the effort to single out everyone as “controlled opposition”.

The real question then is, can we sniff out the opposition and maintain unity within the movement? Are we capable of seeing how vulnerable we all are to divisive tactics, and are we capable of colluding to resist this calculated division? Is resistance possible without sounding like you are condoning disinformation trolls? It may not be but perhaps we can digest this important piece of information about who we are as activists and as humans and find a way to incorporate these realities into becoming super effective activists. Does any of this make sense? Staying focused, sharing information, increasing awareness, offering resistance, and most importantly staying together as a movement, this is how you defeat the globalists.

Related video:

 Did Israel Really Do 9/11?? Or Planned Psyop? Must Watch!

Bernie Suarez is an activist, critical thinker, radio host, musician, M.D, Veteran, lover of freedom and the Constitution, and creator of the Truth and Art TV project. He also has a background in psychology and highly recommends that everyone watch a documentary titled The Century of the Self. Bernie has concluded that the way to defeat the New World Order is to truly be the change that you want to see. Manifesting the solution and putting truth into action is the very thing that will defeat the globalists.



[mailpoet_form id="1"]

About The Author

Bernie Suarez is a revolutionary writer with a background in medicine, psychology, and information technology. He is the author of The Art of Overcoming the New World Order and has written numerous articles over the years about freedom, government corruption and conspiracies, and solutions. A former host of the 9/11 Freefall radio show, Bernie is also the creator of the Truth and Art TV project where he shares articles and videos about issues that raise our consciousness and offer solutions to our current problems. His efforts are designed to encourage others to joyfully stand for truth, to expose government tactics of propaganda, fear and deception, and to address the psychology of dealing with the rising new world order. He is also a former U.S. Marine who believes it is our duty to stand for and defend the U.S. Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic. A peace activist, he believes information and awareness is the first step toward being free from enslavement from the globalist control system which now threatens humanity. He believes love conquers all fear and it is up to each and every one of us to manifest the solutions and the change that you want to see in this world, because doing this is the very thing that will ensure victory and restoration of the human race from the rising global enslavement system, and will offer hope to future generations.

Related posts