“All Truth passes through three stages . . .
First, it is ridiculed . . .
Then, it is violently opposed . . .
Finally, it is accepted as self-evident.”
“In an age of universal deceit,
telling the Truth is a revolutionary act.”
“Whoever controls the past, controls the future.”
“One of the saddest lessons of history is this:
If we’ve been bamboozled long enough,
we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle.
We’re no longer interested in finding out the Truth.
The bamboozle has captured us.
It’s simply too painful to acknowledge,
even to ourselves,
that we’ve been taken.
Once you give a charlatan power over you,
you almost never get it back.”
“It is easier to fool people
than to convince them that they have been fooled.”
Life is not so much a battle between right and wrong, as it is a battle between Truth and Lies, as this generally precedes, and ultimately leads to, good or evil. Truth leads to good. Lies lead to evil. Life is wonderfully simple.
The simple fact is, half of all crimes are “conspiracies”. Half are done without forethought, in the heat of the emotion of the moment, and half are plotted out in advance, thus making them conspiracies. Those who would like the public to ignore half of all the crimes in the world by ridiculing those with an intellect to perceive such forethought frauds are simply those perpetrating the deceptions in the first place!
We have to understand that if a tiny spider, the size of a dime, can meticulously plan and trap its prey weeks in advance, than the human mind, if inclined to evil, can do so much more evil, much farther in advance. Additionally, a lie, or a conspiracy, is the only crime that can exist without tangible evidence. If someone is murdered, there is a dead body. If someone steals, there is the material possession lacking in one place and existing in another. Yet, when someone lies, where is the lie? A lie is the only crime that you cannot touch, that you cannot see. A lie is purely ethereal. This is why lies are the favorite misdeeds of habitual criminals. After all, out of all of the crimes committed in the world for which people are put in prison, how many of them are there for simply lying?
The origin of crime is the lie, or conspiracy, invented in advance of the iniquity, to cover up the wrongdoing before it is even committed. When crimes are committed on a national and international scale, then national and international lies or conspiracies are needed. This is why criminal multibillion-dollar corporations and governments have consolidated all television networks, magazines, and newspapers. It is to control your perception of reality, not to offer you reality. As someone who worked as senior editor in television news for two years, I can testify to this fact. We referred to our broadcast as a “show”, not “news”, simply because it was completely contrived from the top down like any corporation, where the “anchors” (readers) simply regurgitated the scripted words from unseen superiors. Don’t believe me? Simply watch the clip below, and notice the network logos in the lower part of the screen (left and right) which reveal that ALL of the major networks (ABC, FOX, NBC, CBS) are receiving scripts from a CENTRAL authority above them. “Independent” News? . . . Give me a break!
Click HERE to see this amazing proof.
While the naïve studio audience being shown these clips laughed at the reality of the outrageousness of this blatant centralized media control, when I watched the clip, my heart sank in horror within the depths of my soul as to the degree to which the average citizen is subject to their mental manipulations.
Highly respected and Pulitzer Prize winning “Watergate” reporter Carl Bernstein had this to say about exactly who it is who has CENTRAL control over the media . . . The “CENTRAL Intelligence Agency (CIA) of course . . . the very ones who staged the “moon missions” through their favorite manipulative tool . . . Television.
“More than 400 American ‘journalists’ (that we know of) have secretly carried out assignments for the Central Intelligence Agency, according to documents on file at CIA headquarters. In many instances, CIA documents show that ‘journalists’ were contracted to perform covert missions for the CIA with the consent of the managers of America’s leading news organizations. Among the executives (that we know of) who lent their cooperation to the CIA, were the heads of Time Magazine, Newsweek, the New York Times, ABC, NBC, CBS, the Associate Press, United Press International, and Reuters.”
I think that just about covers everyone.
Regardless of who killed Kennedy, whether it was Oswald or another, the president remains dead. Regardless of who orchestrated 911, three thousand still perished. The uniqueness of the “moon landing” deception, unlike the others, is that it was the only conspiracy that I know of which was positive. It was a lie that made everyone feel good. Trying to take that away from someone is like telling them their home team cheated to win the Super Bowl. They are in no way interested in hearing such a thing, even if it is True. In the same way, I once asked a renowned college professor at a prestigious university what he would think about the “moon landings” if he heard Neil Armstrong himself confess to the deception. He replied, “I’d still think we went” . . . and I am the one who is delusional?
When I was a child, believing in Santa clause was so much fun. When I found out that it was merely a deception to make me feel good, I was devastated. Believing that we live in a magical world where men can fly to the moon on their very first attempt with 1960’s technology is fun too, even though the feat cannot be repeated nearly five decades later, by any nation on earth, including the one that allegedly did it first nearly fifty years ago, even though all Truth reminds us that the South Pole, and Mount Everest, and First Flight, and the Light Bulb, was never, ever achieved on the first attempt, and certainly never abandoned once achieved, never to be repeated again.
Why do so many smart people believe this lie? Because they want to. They want to believe this lie. Believing this lie means that they live in a better world than they actually do. Yet the fact is, they do not. The number one reason I hear from intelligent yet disbelieving critics of the moon landing fraud is that, “No one would ever do such a dishonest thing as lying about such an important accomplishment”. They forget that they live in a world full of unthinkable child molestation, vicious murder, hateful racism, deplorable rape, and horrific million-man genocide. In a world such as this, what is it in comparison to merely cheat in a race, as so many people have done before? In their longing to be part of a society of pride boosting magical science, “intellectuals” fail to see the plainness of this simple fact: Technology does not go backwards.
If it were so easy to go to the moon in the 1960’s on the very first attempt with 1/millionth less computing power than is found in a cell phone, a distance which is about 100 Times farther than the most advanced modern manned rocket can presently travel, then not only would the feat be easily and routinely repeatable today, there would be lunar bases and telescopes there by now, nearly five decades later. The South Pole has temperatures that reach below 100 degrees Fahrenheit (-73 C) and nearly continual hurricane force wind, yet there are bases and telescopes there today. Why? Because it is humanly possible. If it were humanly possible to reach the moon, nearly fifty years ago or today, there too would be bases there right now. The fact that there are not, with half a century more advancements in rockets and computers, is proof itself that it simply cannot be done . . . today or fifty years ago. The problem is, you have to be willing to give up this deep emotional imprinting, in pursuit of Honor and Truth, in order to see the plainness of this reality.
After Columbus arrived in the “New World”, within a year, numerous other European nations traveled to the Americas. After Lewis and Clark ventured to the American west, shortly thereafter, citizens everywhere traveled to the American west. After the Wright brothers accomplished powered flight, within a year, numerous others repeated their technological accomplishment.
Charles Lindbergh first flew across the Atlantic in an airplane in 1927. Fifty years later, there were millions of airplanes flying across the Atlantic. Soon it will be fifty years since America allegedly had men leisurely playing golf on the moon in complete safety, all with 1960’s technology, and on the very first attempt. In comparison, the 747 aircraft, built after seventy years of successful aviation history and millions of manufactured aircraft, which was developed at the very same time as the “Apollo” spacecraft, the first ever vehicle to allegedly take men to another planet, yet the 747 took one year longer to construct and endured over 160 failed engine attempts before it finally got off of the ground!
When it comes to perceiving the Truth in a world full of lies, historically, the majority has always been deceived, and later proved wrong, by the minority of their contemporaries, whom they persecuted and considered deluded at the time, when in fact, it was they who were misled. Does a person know it when they are deceived? No, they do not. You see, you can be sincere . . . and be sincerely wrong.
The majority of scientists thought the world was flat. The majority of astronomers thought the Earth was the center of the universe. The majority of physicians thought bleeding the sickness out of a person was a cure. The majority of Americans thought Nixon was honest. Likewise, a majority of scientists, astronomers, physicians, and Americans think the moon landings were real, yet their titles and majority do not equal Truth, as history has well proven . . . and will prove again.
Why is it so difficult for them to see the Truth?
Very simple . . . Pride.
“The Pride of your heart has deceived you.”
Pride is simply the un-willingness to be wrong, just as humility is the willingness to be wrong. The great thing about being wrong, which is what I had to finally admit about the “moon landings”, is that I am learning something new, and I am no longer walking through life in error. The bad thing about being right all the time, is that I cannot learn anything new, and I am living my life in a self-deceived state, which is the very worst form of deception. When someone else deceives me, if I try hard enough, I can eventually figure it out, after all, I know that other people cannot be trusted all of the time. Yet when I am self-deceived, it is nearly impossible for me to overcome this, because the person I am relying on for “facts” is myself . . . and of course I can trust myself . . . even when I am wrong.
When someone considers themself smart, this is the first step towards their ignorance. They boast about their years of experience and degrees, and thereby pour concrete around their finite knowledge, unknowingly calling their stone mound of limited facts, the entire universe of Truth. If you try to tell them they are wrong, they will defend their post to their emotional and intellectual death at all cost, all the while attempting to defile you with their venomous words for pointing out their error, even though you are right and merely trying to help them.
Just like OJ Simpson’s lawyers (who later admitted they knew of his guilt and were only “doing their job”), no matter how plain the evidence, their pride-filled manipulative lawyer-like minds have an explanation for why the Truth is a lie, and why a lie is the truth, otherwise they would be forced to admit their error, which their pride will not allow, and which blinds them from the unwanted reality. With every evidence submitted as to why the moon landings were indeed falsified, no matter how condemning and obvious, there is always a zealous counter-explanation to throw away the Truth and institute a lie in its place, in order to keep their glorious fantasy alive.
Just because someone has explanations for everything,
does not mean that the explanations are True.
Rather than looking for the Truth, at the unacceptable cost of being wrong, the majority of people, because of their blinding pride in the accomplishments of themselves and like-minded others, instead “Gather around them a great number of teachers to tell them what their itching ears want to hear”. (2nd Timothy 4:3) In other words, rather than looking for the Truth, they look for people to agree with what they already believe, so as to prove themselves right.
The real question is, if you had cancer, would you want to know? . . . Or would you rather have your doctor lie to you and tell you that everything was just fine . . . even though it really wasn’t? Sometimes you have to cut off a diseased limb to save your life. The same is True of the “moon landing” of the 1960’s.
If the “moon missions” were real, then they hold a place of prominence in the annals of human history. If they were not real, and billions of dollars were embezzled from the taxpayers to lie to the very ones who funded the missions, then this would actually be a more significant moment in history than if they had actually gone!
Thusly, this Great Truth, the faking of the moon missions out of pride, arrogance, and greed, is being withheld by the minority of government leaders against the vast majority of citizens.
Because they think they are better than the rest of us.
It is at this point that I highly recommend you watch the film I made on this subject entitled “A Funny Thing happened on the way to the Moon“, so that you can not only fully comprehend the historical as well as hidden facts of this event, yet also understand my earnest motives for bringing this sad chapter of American history into the light, for the betterment of future generations, and to prevent such blindness from causing the nation to thusly walk off a future cliff.
Until the Truth comes out about the “moon landings”, humanity’s character, and especially that of America, will be forever stunted from growth and advancement, the very aid of which would come by simply admitting this very mistake with its deplorable dishonesty. Unless we are willing to face and confess the cold hard facts of our errors, much like a disciplined athlete rejecting appealing yet detrimental desserts, we will be under the spell, and complete control of, this diabolical minority of government leaders who represent themselves rather than the people.
The falsified “moon landings” are utter proof that this is the state in which America lives today, the very admission of which would lead to these unscrupulous leaders’ demise. This is why there are more than a hundred websites and films in existence today, specifically dedicated to squashing the emerging Truth of the “moon landings” blatant and deplorable falsification. The fact is, if the “moon landings” were so obviously real (which were said to have been done with such ease on the very first attempt with 1960’s technology, though they cannot be duplicated today by any nation on earth with nearly fifty years more advancements in rockets and computers, including the nation that is said to have done them initially), then anyone who says otherwise is merely an idiot. Why then are there more than a hundred websites and films, which took tens of thousands of hours to produce, in existence to refute the insane rantings of morons? As Shakespeare so famously said, “Thou does protest too much.” Another historical commentator said this . . .
“The likelihood of one individual being right, increases in direct proportion to the intensity with which others are trying to prove him wrong.”
Even former president Clinton, once holding the (allegedly) highest office in the land, doubts the authenticity of the moon landings. On Page 156 of his biography “My Life” he states:
“Just a month before, Apollo 11 astronauts Buzz Aldrin and Neil Armstrong had left their colleague, Michael Collins, aboard spaceship Columbia and ‘walked on the moon’, beating by five months President Kennedy’s goal of putting a man on the moon before the decade was out. The old carpenter asked me if I really believed it happened. I said sure, I saw it on television. He disagreed; he said that he didn’t believe it for a minute, that ‘them television fellers’ could make things look real that weren’t. Back then, I thought he was a crank. During my eight years in Washington, I saw some things on TV that made me wonder if he wasn’t ahead of his time.”
If a president of the United States is finally admitting his doubts as to the authenticity of the “moon landings” (albeit, after he safely left office) and is calling those who perceive the Truth of the event “ahead of their time“, shouldn’t you also reconsider your thinking on the matter, if you haven’t already?
My life story regarding the “moon landings” is a True conversion story, much like an ancient religious leader who persecuted the Truth, whom then became their leader. My father was in the Air Force. As a result, I grew up around the latest aviation and technology. I loved it! On July 20th, 1969, I was only four years of age, quietly asleep in bed. My father, as a high-ranking military officer, was given a VIP package of commemorative photographs of the event, which he gave to me as a cherished present. From the age of about four to fourteen, these pictures of the “moon landings” covered an entire “sacred” wall in my bedroom. It was a shrine (like a religion) to the intellectual prowess of mankind. I saw these images, every day, three hundred sixty-five days a year, for ten years. This means I propagated the desired belief in their authenticity, three thousand six hundred fifty times before I even considered the possibility that they were misrepresentations of reality . . . That’s a lot of brainwashing!
Fortunately, at the age of fourteen, I saw an innovative television program featuring an interview with William Kaysing, a NASA contractor during the Apollo “moon missions”. He asserted quite confidently, from first hand experience, that the impossible Apollo flights were staged to increase the prestige of the United States during the height of the Cold War, and in the pit of domestic discontentment because of tens of thousands of young American men dying needlessly in an ambiguous foreign war in Vietnam. Nixon himself said at the time that the Vietnam War protests were the number one cause of American strife.
After watching the program, I went to my bedroom wall shrine of “moon landing” pictures and looked, for the very first time, with new eyes, at theses surprisingly telling photographs. Sure enough, just like Kaysing said, stunning evidence of photographic anomalies were hidden in plain sight! (They say that this is the very best place to hide something investigators are looking for!) I just had to have “eyes that see”, after all, a famous prophet notably said that most people “have eyes that do not see, and ears that do not hear”.
I equate this with a saltshaker always being placed in the left kitchen cabinet, on the third shelf, on the left side, for ten years. If your spouse inadvertently moves it to the left kitchen cabinet, on the third shelf, on the right side . . . you do not see it, even though it is right there in front of your eyes! . . . There you stand, with the cabinet door wide open, the salt shaker right in front of you, only inches away (though on the right side of the shelf rather than the left, where you were conditioned to not look), and you do not see it! . . . There I was, looking at the same pictures of the alleged moon landings, over and over again for a full decade, yet not seeing quite obvious inconsistencies and abnormalities that would quickly give away the deceptive criminality of the event, if only I would look beyond my programmed response.
In a way, like naïve Adam and Eve, you can’t blame people for initially being deceived, after all, which is a more pleasant realm in which to live, one in which your country and world continually lies about history and spending, or one in which your country and world is honorable and honest? Naturally, most people see the latter, simply because this is the kind of reality they would rather believe.
Fortunately, at the age of twenty-four, I had become a filmmaker, and happened to be editing a movie one day for the very producer of the program I had seen as a fourteen year old, ten years earlier, about the moon landing fraud! “Do you remember that man you had on your show who said the moon landings were fake?” I asked, “What is his name? I’d like to talk with him.” The rest is history.
I went from being the biggest fan of the moon missions, to becoming their most outspoken critic. Why? Because I was open minded and willing to be wrong when the evidence presented itself to the contrary of my first opinion, even if that evidence was unpredicted, unprecedented, and very depressing.
Hitler, the master of deception, said that it was actually easier to get away with a Gigantic Lie than a small one, because small lies are so common, and therefore anticipated, so that no one would expect the audacity of a grand deception. This is precisely the psychological tactic that was used by the CIA in precipitating and maintaining the monumental, yet very simple, lie of the “moon landings”.
During the domestically injurious riots protesting the Vietnam War, president Nixon decided that a unifying pep rally of a successful “moon landing” was just what the sickly American patient needed. Do you really think that Nixon was going to risk killing three “National Heroes” on live worldwide television, when simply failing to rescue kidnapped hostages would ruin you for life as it did president Carter a few years later? How then could Nixon absolutely guarantee a successful “moon mission”? . . . To stage it! . . . Not to mention that it was technologically impossible at the time to begin with. In fact, according to NASA contractor William Kaysing, who worked for six years on the Apollo program, a classified interdepartmental memo, which he personally read and edited, estimated the likelihood of a successful manned moon mission on the first attempt at a mere one in ten thousand chance.
Some assume that if the Soviet Union (Russia) or Chinese intelligence agencies found out that the American “moon landings” were fraudulent they would “spill the beans” to the rest of the world. This is simply not true, and again, thinking only one step farther than programmed to do so, reveals the Truth. If wars are created for the profiteering of the “Military Industrial Complex”, as many forward thinking people including president Eisenhower now realize, then foreign “adversaries” of America may merely be created by the American government for profitable ends for the billionaire military manufacturers who got them elected.
Think about it: America has been engaged in some kind of profitable war for two hundred fourteen years of its two hundred forty year history, more than 90% of the time. As such, Russia and China are, in fact, friends of the United States government, despite mainstream media appearances which portray them as villains for profit, as trillions of dollars in annual profitable trading proves. (Just imagine a fake wrestling match in which both sides are paid by the same party.) This being the case, these overseas entities would not bring the Truth of such an American scandal into the light to injure their trading partner to their own financial loss, not to mention that their hidden skeletons would be forced out of the closet in retaliation. Any “bad blood” the United States appears to have with foreign powers is merely staged for the very purpose of keeping their complicity a secret and the trillions of dollars in profitable military spending flowing.
Even if these two “super-powers” were actual enemies of America, they still would not expose the Truth about the moon missions. For example, if I had a picture of the president with a prostitute, would it be more profitable for me to give it away to the press for free, or to blackmail the president, year after year, with ever increasing tolls until the day they died? If such countries really were enemies of America and had proof of the moon landing fraud, which I suspect they do, it would serve their interests much more to keep such knowledge to themselves and blackmail the United States, year after year, administration after administration, to get the behind-the-scenes negotiations to favor them, whether it regards trade, arms, debt, or anything else they so desire. The Truth coming out would be good for America in this way too, putting an end to any potential blackmail.
The fact is, there were no “independent” tracking stations for the Apollo missions. The only entities that had such capability were the United States’ own government agencies (who orchestrated the deception) and the aforementioned countries, who profited from keeping the secret. Additionally, NASA launched the “Tetra-A” satellite shortly before the Apollo missions to simulate transmissions coming from the moon so that their ground crews could rehearse the “moon landings” during their many simulations. Conveniently, it was purported that the Tetra-A satellite “accidentally burned up” in the earth’s atmosphere just before the first “moon mission”, that way the government satellite could secretly still be in service, performing the same simulation function during the “moon missions” to convince the staff at NASA of their authenticity. In fact, a retired ground crew member recently acknowledged that, “Our computers could tell no difference whatsoever between a “real” and a “simulated rehearsal” moon mission.”
From Wikipedia regarding The Apollo Fraud:
“Some people insist that the Apollo moon landings were a Cold War deception of the Nixon administration. However, “empirical” evidence is readily available to show that manned moon landings did occur. Anyone on earth with an appropriate laser and telescope system can apparently bounce laser beams off three retro-reflector arrays reported to be left on the moon by Apollo 11, 14 and 15, suggesting deployment of the lunar laser ranging equipment at asserted Apollo moon landing sites, implying equipment constructed on earth was transported to the surface of the moon. In addition, in August 2009, NASA’s lunar reconnaissance orbiter claimed to send back high-resolution photos of the estimated Apollo landing sites. These government issued pictures show not only what is reported to be the faint shadows of the descent stages of the lunar landers allegedly left behind, but also apparent tracks of the astronauts’ walking paths nearby in the lunar dust.”
When they use statements like “empirical evidence is readily available to show that the manned moon landings did occur”, it not only shows their arrogance (which, in and of itself, demonstrates their blindness to the facts), it also exemplifies their desperation to make an argument, that is so much losing ground, that they have to resort to the administration in power tactic by claiming that if you don’t agree with them, you are somehow deficient in intelligence. Again, if the “moon landings” were so obviously real (even though they cannot be repeated today with fifty years more advanced technology), and there is no proof whatsoever of their deliberate falsification, then there would be no need whatsoever for the hundred plus films and websites solely dedicated to reassure the public of their genuineness! The fact that there are, is proof itself that mounting evidence does exist which proves them to be a forgery, otherwise the deceptively claimed “obviousness” of their authenticity would speak for itself. When a structure needs such repeated precarious support and maintenance, this alone is evidence that it is not sound to begin with.
First of all, it was proven in 1962 that a laser can be bounced and calibrated off of the moon without a manmade reflector thereon, simply due to the reflectivity of the lunar surface. NASA simply designated these reflective locations as “landing sites” for the very purpose of contriving this evidence. Additionally, Russia put a manmade mirror on the moon’s surface during the time of the “Apollo” missions for this same claimed reason, using instead an un-manned probe that would not have to suffer the biological ravages of lethal space radiation en route, one of the main reasons NASA was, and still is, unable to go to the moon. Don’t believe me? Click HERE to see the March 1959 issue, Volume 200, Number 3, of the magazine “Scientific American“, article entitled “Radiation Belts Around the Earth“, to see how deadly and impenetrable space radiation is beyond the safety of low earth orbit where the space station currently resides, at an altitude of merely 250 miles above the earth, the moon being about 239,000 miles away, or roughly 1000 Times farther. Furthermore, seeing how all of these lasers have their data computer controlled, it would only take one computer hacker to manipulate the information shown on a viewing screen, making even the employees of NASA ignorant of the facts. (This was precisely the case at “mission control” during the “moon missions”, where dozens of computer “operators”, actually just read the concocted preprogrammed data screens like news anchors, who do not write their own words, openly admitting afterwards that they could tell no difference whatsoever between a flight “simulation” and a “real” flight.)
Secondly, to say that additional new photographs from the criminal NASA are evidence that prove the moon landings were real . . . is laughable. They already faked high resolution, full body pictures, of an astronaut standing right on the moon’s surface nearly fifty years ago, so what is it to fake additional pictures now, with almost five decades better “Photoshop” technology, of such simple things as alleged shadows of lunar landers or faint footpaths on the moon’s surface, allegedly taken from NASA’s own orbiting satellites? These diehard believers are just seeing what they want to see, like a naïve spouse of a cheating partner, accepting the fox’s evidence that they didn’t steal a chicken.
Additional arguments against the fraud are reported to be the hundreds of thousands of people throughout the industry who contributed to the “moon missions”, who allegedly would have been informed of the fraud and kept it a secret. Again, seemingly a good argument, yet it is not with only a little extra thought. Do you really think the CIA would be so careless as to tell hundreds of thousands of low-level contractors the goings-on of a top-top-secret project? Would the CIA really be so inept as to tell the person making the rocket’s door handle, or the glove or the boot of the spacesuit, that they were secretly faking the moon landings and to be sure not to tell anyone? Do we really think the CIA is stupid enough to tell hundreds of thousands of low-level workers something they wanted to keep as a strict secret? Furthermore, to say that because my uncle worked at NASA and believed the “moon landings” were real is proof that they were real, is like saying that because my uncle worked as a vender at the Super Bowl and believed that the game was honest, that this is proof that the football players didn’t cheat.
Just like a pyramid of power in any business, what the employee, the manager, and the regional manager knows about the business’ actual agenda, is completely different than what the CEO at the very top knows. Remember, there were only three people (“trusted” government employees) who were actually there at the time of the “moon missions”, with no independent press coverage whatsoever. As demonstrated in my film “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon”, the three crew members were indeed on the rocket, they did launch into earth orbit on July 16th, 1969 (to attain realistic “zero gravity” flight photography within the spacecraft), they did splash down in the ocean eight days later (to add to the authenticity), yet the rest of the mission, everything beyond earth orbit (which is only what astronauts can do today with fifty years more advanced technology), was completely contrived, like a masterful illusionist, by satellite data manipulation, complete media control, and professional movie sets. After all, what is easier to do, to actually build a rocket and travel to another planet with 1960’s technology on the very first attempt, or to simply make a movie about it? The age-old argument “The simplest explanation is the True one“, which many Apollo proponents deceptively use to suggest the “moon missions” were real, actually proves the fraud instead!
The simple fact is, it is easier to fake a moon mission than to actually do one . . . the exact reason why the recent film “The Martian” was filmed in an earthly simulated television studio, rather than on Mars.
Some of the best evidence supporting the fraud is the fact that in 1998, when the space shuttle flew to its highest altitude ever, 365 miles, one third higher than they normally flew, they were asked to descend to a lower altitude by mission control due to lethal space radiation they encountered, by approaching too close to the “Van Allen Radiation Belts”, which don’t even begin until one thousand miles altitude (and continue for an additional 25,000 miles). That is to say, they were 635 miles away from radiation that was so intense, that the crew reported they could see the radiation with their eyes closed as sparks of light hitting the retinas of their closed eyes. When this happened, CNN inadvertently and unknowingly, reported the moon landing fraud by stating . . .
“The radiation belt surrounding earth is more dangerous than previously believed.”
Apparently, not a single journalist on the entire planet figured out, except for myself, that this statement totally contradicts the authenticity of the “moon landings” . . . Here’s why . . .
The only time in world history when human beings are said to have traveled through the 25,000 mile thick radiation field called the “Van Allen Radiation Belts” (which unbeknownst to most surrounds the Earth starting at an altitude of one thousand miles and extends 25,000 miles beyond that) is during the alleged Apollo “moon missions”, as all other manned missions, from every country on earth including the United States (such as Gemini, Mercury, Soyuz, Skylab, the Space Shuttle, and the current International Space Station), all orbited about 750 miles below this dangerous radiation field (merely two hundred fifty miles above the Earth’s surface), specifically out of safety concerns for the lethal radiation above. Even airline crews, two hundred forty miles below this orbital altitude, are subject to health concerns from this hazardous radiation, so all the more for astronauts.
Why is it then that Space Shuttle astronauts, some 635 miles away from this intense radiation, twenty-nine years after the first “moon mission”, knew more about the radiation than the Apollo astronauts who claimed they were in the middle of it eighteen times to the moon and back? Remember, the Space Shuttle crew’s recent discovery proves that this large radiation field is “more dangerous than previously believed”. What is “previously believed” if not based on the previous reports from the “experts” of the radiation field, the Apollo crews, who were allegedly the only ones in all of world history to have ever traveled through this radiation, with no ill health effects of any kind and no reports of the visible sparks of radiation being seen, as were later reported by the Shuttle crew from six hundred thirty-five miles away!
Of course, this is simply not possible if the “moon missions” were real.
What does this mean?
It means that the “moon mission” astronauts, who previously claimed to have been inside of this large radiation field lied about being there! Of course, if the “Apollo” crews never went through the Van Allen Radiation Belt, as this contradictory report reveals, then they certainly could not have gone to the moon either, which the traversing of this radiation would require! This is precisely why, nearly fifty years later, all that astronauts from any nation on earth can do, including the United States, is orbit the earth at about 250 miles altitude. Seeing how the Space shuttle has killed fourteen people just orbiting at 250 miles above the Earth, and that with well proven, three decades newer technology than the “Apollo” program, it is quite a conundrum that thirty years earlier, with antiquated machinery, NASA claims to have gone 1000 Times farther six times without any fatalities whatsoever, and that with inaugural equipment.
According to the highly esteemed “National Research Council”, a private nonprofit scientific think-tank which submits recommendations to NASA based on the latest scientific findings, radiation beyond Earth orbit is so dangerous that “returning to the moon” is deemed impossible until better ways are found to protect astronauts from this lethal radiation. The question is, if the NRC says that “returning” to the moon is impossible today until better ways are found to protect astronauts from lethal space radiation beyond earth orbit such as the Van Allen Radiation Belts, then how did men reach the moon on their first attempt with 1960’s technology, or better still, why not simply use the same outstanding methodology the supposed first moon crews had to protect themselves from lethal space radiation rather than reinventing the wheel? (You can read their report by clicking HERE.)
Likewise, when Bush Jr. was president, he went on national television and proclaimed that “The United States will return to the moon as a logical first step to Mars and beyond”. Did no one besides me notice that if they really already went to the moon six times, why would they need to do a “first” step over again for the seventh time? He was even so bold as to go on to say that “First we will need to learn how to protect the astronauts from lethal space radiation.” Am I the only one curious enough to ask, “Why not do it the same way that worked so well the first time they went to the moon?”
Why does no journalist connect the obvious dots with this very revealing information except me? Because the dots lead to a horrific Truth that would break the spirit of the entire American nation, proving that most people would rather believe a pleasurable lie, than a painful Truth.
In December of 2014, NASA sent their brand new “Orion” spacecraft, un-manned, directly into the Van Allen Radiation Belt, to a 3,600 mile altitude, and then u-turned it for a prompt return to earth.
What is worth studying at 3,600 miles?
The Van Allen Radiation Belts.
According to NASA, the purpose of the “Orion” mission was to . . . “to test the instruments”. What “instruments” were onboard the Orion spacecraft? GEIGER COUNTERS TO MEASURE THE RADIATION INSIDE OF THE RADIATION BELTS.
Didn’t NASA already have these measurements decades ago from the Apollo moon missions, if indeed men actually went through the radiation belts eighteen times? Why is it so important to “test the instruments” at a 3,600 mile altitude inside of the radiation belts? . . .
To see if humans can survive transversing it . . .
. . . for the very first time!
Apparently today’s new generation of NASA engineers, some in their twenty’s, have stumbled upon this significant NASA contradiction. Though they were probably led into the space exploration field by the motivation of the seemingly glorious inaugural “moon missions” of the 1960’s, the fact that such an acclaimed feat cannot be repeated today, with five decades more advanced technology, and that aside from theses alleged “moon missions” of the Nixon administration, no one has ever gone more than 400 miles away from the earth in the nearly fifty years since, the trip to the moon being 100 Times farther, must make their positions quite precarious.
Kelly Smith, one of these twenty-ish engineers, was selected as the official “Orion” mission spokesperson in the following NASA video press release. Notice that at 43 seconds into the film, Smith confirms that the radiation belts are made up of “Extreme Radiation”. At time 3:06 he again refers to the belts as “Dangerous Radiation”. Finally at time 3:36, for the third time, Smith plainly states, “We must solves these (radiation) challenges before we send people through this region of space.”
The question is, if the solution to the dangerous radiation belt problem has yet to be invented (“We must solves these challenges before we send people through this region of space.”), then how is it that the Apollo crews during their alleged moon missions went through this dangerous and extreme radiation nearly fifty years ago when the necessary equipment to survive doing so has yet to be invented ? (“We MUST solves these challenges BEFORE we send people through this region of space.”)
When I asked NASA’s press office to interview Kelly Smith about this matter, they refused to grant him permission to talk with me. When I emailed a list of mostly harmless questions about the Orion mission, NASA politely answered all of them. When I submitted a more difficult inquiry about Kelly Smith’s three statements about the dangerous radiation of the Van Allen Belts and how the radiation problem must be solved before NASA sends astronauts through them, NASA refused to reply to these questions, as if I had never asked them. When I asked for the radiation readings of the Orion spacecraft’s onboard Geiger Counters, NASA said that such measurements were a secret and that I would have to file a “Freedom of Information Act” request to attain the information. When I asked why such ordinary data about the radiation belt’s strength is a secret, NASA refused to answer and then terminated all further communication with me. (Just 1 REM of radiation per hour is five times a lethal dose. As you will read later below, the radiation belts contain up to 100 REM per hour.)
When NASA sent publicly funded probes and spacecraft to measure the temperature of the sun and the amount of hydrogen in Jupiter’s atmosphere, this information was readily available to scientists and to the public, after all, why would a measurement of a part of nature be a secret? Likewise, the amount radiation in the Van Allen Radiation Belts which surround the Earth is simply a part of nature, and as such, there is no reason whatsoever why such elementary measurements of nature should be a government secret . . . unless disclosing such measurements would reveal the impossibility of the Apollo crews having gone through them and surviving with decades older technology, especially seeing how NASA just acknowledged, accidentally or otherwise, that such protection from this “Dangerous” and “Extreme” radiation has yet to be invented by the space agency and “must” be invented “before we send people through this region of space.”
Quite interesting . . . yes ?
James Van Allen, the discoverer of the radiation belts who so humbly named them after himself, originally said that they were “100-1000 times more radioactive than a lethal dose”! Under pressure from NASA, he dramatically recanted his original findings in order to make it appear as if the moon landings were possible. Don’t believe me? Below is the link to his original published findings in the respected national journal “Scientific American”, in which Van Allen spoke plainly about the radiation belts beyond earth orbit being “an obstacle for practical space travel to the moon and beyond“, just as Kelly Smith of the “Orion” mission did.
Van Allen himself said this, immediately after NASA sent probes with Geiger counters into the radiation belts:
“Our measurements show that the maximum radiation level as of 1958 is equivalent to between 10 and 100 REM per hour, depending on the still undetermined proportion of protons to electrons. Since a human being exposed for two days to even 10 REM would have only an even chance of survival, the radiation belts obviously present an obstacle to space flight.”
(The above comments are at the very end of the article.)
Occupational safety limits for radiation is 5 REM over an entire year, as the danger is calculated by the amount of REM and the period over which it is received, and thereby gradually absorbed, so that the body may have time to gradually expel the radiation before it reaches a lethal level. Absorbing 5 REM of radiation in just an hour, rather than a year, is 24 times a lethal dose. 10 REM of radiation absorbed in an hour is therefore 48 times more lethal a dose than 10 REM gradually absorbed and expelled over two days (or 48 hours), which Van Allen himself said was already a lethal dose (as calculated by it killing 50 percent of those exposed to it). Rounding 48 times a lethal dose per hour in the radiation belts up to 50 (for the slightly longer than an hour trip through them to leave Earth orbit and reach the moon) and then doubling the amount for the return from the moon through the radiation belts again to reenter Earth orbit, this is, according to Van Allen himself, a minimum of 100 times a lethal dose and a maximum of 1000 times a lethal dose for the trip to the moon and back.
The “Apollo” spacecraft had inferior shielding (1/8th of an inch of aluminum) compared to than of a medical x-ray technician, who wears a much more effective lead vest (prohibitive to launch into space because of the weight), even though the radiation exposure to a chest x-ray is 1/5000th of the radiation exposure to the Van Allen radiation belts, and that only for a split second, rather than continually for more than two hours during the alleged trip to the moon and back. Some misinformed NASA fans have falsely claimed that the Apollo astronauts did not go through the radiation belts (though NASA never made such a claim), yet this is a scientific impossibility unless the launches took place at the North or South Poles where there are small openings in the belts, as Van Allen clearly stated at the end of the above article. The problem there would be the impossibility of launching at such cold temperatures, at least 50 degrees Fahrenheit (19 C) or more below acceptable levels, as the Space Shuttle Challenger’s cold launch explosion at just 36 degrees Fahrenheit (2 C) already proved was deadly. What these diehard unresearched supporters of the fraud have inadvertently admitted, is that yes indeed the radiation belts are deadly, just as Van Allen and NASA’s own Kelly Smith acknowledged in the “Orion” mission video press release. By desperately saying the crews went around them in a forlorn attempt to prove the missions real (even though NASA claims the crews went right through them), in their acknowledgement of the belt’s lethality, they have themselves unknowingly conceded that the missions were scientifically impossible.
Even self-proclaimed “moon” astronaut Alan Bean, when I interviewed him unprepared for my challenging questions, accidentally admitted on camera that he did not travel through the lethal Van Allen radiation belts (which he would have to in order to reach the moon). When I pointed out this error to him, he corrected himself by saying, “Maybe we did (go through the radiation belts)”. When I asked him if he experienced any unusual phenomenon from traveling through the radiation belts, he said “No”. When I pointed out to him that a crew of the space shuttle, decades after his alleged moon mission, on the highest altitude of any space shuttle flight, more than 600 miles away from just the beginning of the intense radiation belts, experienced radiation that was so severe, even from that great distance away, that they could see the radiation as sparks of lights through their closed eyelids, Bean then suddenly remembered seeing the same phenomenon! When I pointed out to him that I believed that this space shuttle crew was the first of any astronauts in history to report this strange phenomenon, he changed his story a third time to keep up with the revelatory information, and immediately recanted what he had just said about seeing the radioactive “sparks of light” in the first place! . . . Absolutely amazing! (Did I mention the fact that each astronaut who was interviewed at length asked for Two Thousand Dollars an Hour in cash for the honor of being lied to?)
(You can also see at time 27:31 – 27:45 in “Astronauts Gone Wild“ by clicking HERE, that Eugene Cernan says that the descent engine to the lunar surface was “very loud”, while Bean says that “you couldn’t hear it because of the vacuum of space”.)
In August of 2009 it was reported, albeit as a news oddity (and it certainly was) that a “moon rock”, personally given to the president of the Netherlands by Neil Armstrong in 1969, who supposedly hand picked it off of the moon’s surface himself, was opened forty years later from its hermitically sealed container by a curious museum curator after they had watched “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon”. Following microscopic examination, the rock was verified to actually be a deceptively “another worldly” looking piece of petrified wood instead! Yet again, not a single journalist, except for myself, asked the question, “If the moon rocks are fake . . . What about the moon missions?” (You can read the story by clicking HERE.)
When I discovered absolute proof (actual, on camera evidence) that the Apollo astronauts never left earth orbit (contained in a newly discovered unedited NASA reel which was never broadcast to the public; debuted in “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon” and showcased below) and showed this controversial videotape to a news director at NBC, he turned pale white, practically fainted, and collapsed in his chair exclaiming, “Oh, my God! It looks like we didn’t go to the moon!”
“I know”, I said, “What do we do?”
This man, who held the betterment of America in his hand, thought for a long time . . . and then eventually . . . “chickened out”. He said, “I cannot broadcast this with a clear conscious. It will cause a civil war. I will not be the one responsible for that.”
While I disagree that the public knowing the Truth about the “moon missions” would cause a civil war, the citizens would probably demand immense government reform, or possibly a new institution thereof, as well as start investigating other matters of their yet uncovered dark corruption and deception. Naturally, government criminals would rather not get caught and preserve their way of life, which the release of this information would inevitably bring. This is precisely why my film has never been broadcast, only to be seen on DVD and Youtube. Instead, numerous networks (owned by bedfellows of the government) have broadcast a dozen full-length documentaries as to why my well-known film’s accusations are “unfounded”.
If more people would only view with an open, deprogrammed mind, “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon”, which contains newly discovered video evidence of the moon landing fraud, then they would see, with their own eyes, these recently uncovered unedited behind-the-scenes outtakes of false photography from the first “moon mission”, which prove the deception beyond any doubt. In fact, four out of five people who view this footage, who previously thought the alleged “moon landings” were real, recant their faith in the supposed mission’s authenticity. Thusly you can see why broadcasters are terrified to present this extremely condemning evidence to the public. If they did so, plainly acknowledging as the news director did that this proves the “moon missions” were a government deception, then not only would they be admitting their own complicity in the fallacy by being the means through which this lie was disseminated, the public would also call into question the very foundational integrity of the government, possibly leading to its demise, as well as their own permanence for their participatory dishonesty.
The unedited outtakes of which I speak, were never broadcast to the public. In them, Neil Armstrong is using a one-foot diameter model of the Earth, inside the spacecraft from low Earth orbit, to create the illusion for the television audience, that he and his crew are halfway to the moon, when they are, in reality, still in Earth orbit, from which they never left. This is absolute proof that, though they were on the rocket in Earth orbit, such as where the Space Station presently resides, the crew never went any farther. We know now that this was due to the lethal radiation of the Van Allen radiation belts.
This revealing footage is even dated by NASA’s own computer clock as having taken place two days into Armstrong’s flight, when he is supposed to be halfway to the moon, or some 135,000 miles away from the Earth, yet he and his crew are clearly shown to still be in Earth orbit, and are instead, falsifying the television photography to deceive the viewing public as to their real location. The CIA is even heard on a private, third audio channel, prompting Armstrong to respond to Mission Control’s questions only after four seconds have elapsed, in order to create the false impression of an increased radio delay, so as to appear to be much farther from the Earth than he and his crew actually were. (Jump ahead to time 32:03 – 40:50 in “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon” by clicking HERE if you do not wish to view the entire forty-seven minute documentary and only see these newly discovered unedited out-takes of Neil Armstrong falsifying mission photography during the historic and now infamous flight.)
Do to the obvious genuineness of the footage I uncovered (as it matches their other broadcasts), NASA had to acknowledge that this newly discovered unedited behind-the-scenes video from the first “moon mission” which debuted in “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon” is indeed authentic, they simply said that I was “misinterpreting” it. Misguided diehard fans of NASA and detractors of my documentary on the internet elaborated a bit more, to their very own demise. They plainly acknowledged the simple fact that the crew was indeed falsifying the photography of being “halfway to the moon”, as nearly everyone has the mind to see and admit, claiming though that the crew did so merely to “rehearse” an upcoming scene for the television viewers.
The fact is, this “moon mission” cost about one million dollars per minute. As such, the last thing the crew would do, would be wasting their precious time and limited weight creating a model of the Earth in space at an alleged distance of halfway to the moon, when the real Earth from a distance halfway to the moon was supposed to be right outside their window! If the crew was “rehearsing”, they would have just “rehearsed” with the real Earth out the window rather than wasting valuable time creating an unnecessary model of what supposedly really existed! Furthermore, the edited and approved segments of this exact footage, those without the errors I uncovered which give the illusion away, appear in numerous NASA documentaries where their narrator refers to the very same material as genuine! Additionally, with their already being talk at the time by 10% of Americans that the mission was disingenuous government propaganda, the last thing NASA would do if the mission was real would be to falsify any of it, for fear they would be accused of this dishonesty.
What critics have inadvertently done, is acknowledged that the first “moon crew” falsified part of their photography! Thank you! (Now you see why broadcasters will not present my film.) The fact is, if they really went to the moon, there would be no need to falsify any of the photography. Just as if only one ingredient at a salad bar is contaminated with poison it fails the health inspection, having discovered only one reel of false footage disqualifies the “reality” of the missions!
All that desperate critics were left with to say was that the remarkable newly uncovered, unedited behind-the-scenes footage of outtakes of blatant false photography from the first mission, was “no big discovery because the video is readily available to the public”. These people are obviously lying through their teeth. It says in BIG LETTERS, right at the beginning of the newly discovered reel, “NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION”. Take it from someone who has personally and exhaustively gone through the entire NASA archives, more than any diehard fan of the “moon missions” has ever done. This is the ONLY un-edited reel available. Absolutely everything else is pre-edited. My detractors know this, and shortly after my film debuted, they borrowed some of the footage to put in their new pro-NASA releases, as it was not available previously, in a dying attempt to minimize the important discovery by falsely trying to demonstrate that pro-NASA people had access to this remarkable find all along, though it was never shown by them until now, unwittingly proving, by their latent disclosure, the genuineness of the important revelatory discovery. In their edited version though, they specifically deleted the most revealing video segments, as well as the audio of the CIA prompting the astronauts with “Talk” at the beginning of the deplorable fraudulent footage, done so to remind Armstrong to respond to Mission Control’s questions only after four seconds have elapsed, so as to create the false impression of an increased radio delay and thusly appearing to be much farther away from the Earth than he and his crew actually were. Why would they edit out this important betraying segment, if this newly discovered hidden track of secret audio revealed nothing of the forgery?
Some despondent critics have even suggested that I am the one doing the deceiving, simply because in my documentary I edit from one relevant part of the footage to another. As my film is only forty-seven minutes in length and the unedited reel is one hour forty-eight minutes long, this is no more deceptive than a news sportscaster, with limited time for their segment, showing just the highlights of a football game. Some, believe it or not, are so desperate to keep the Truth buried, that they have even suggested that I staged the violent attacks which I received from the various angry astronauts! (LOL . . . At least they are being creative!)
I am constantly assailed with the age-old juvenile, disreputable, and ineffective technique of assaulting the bearer who brings bad news, by those who feel they have no other course of action because the reality of my position speaks for itself and cannot be truthfully refuted otherwise. The fact that critics resort to attacking the messenger is proof itself that the message is sound, otherwise they would have no need to do so in the defense of their position, if their position was not so dramatically faltering to begin with and in such dire need of misdirection from the condemning evidence. In coping with the pressures of such professional and personal ostracization, I once gave prescription antidepressants a try. In doing so while engaged in a prolong fast (sixty days without food), I had a negative reaction, having a fit or rage over a disputed parking place, where I walked across the hood of my adversary’s car, denting it in the process. While the “investigative journalist” to whom I gave personal copies of the fraudulent moon landing footage years earlier completely ignored reporting on this felony of the United States Government, they found it noteworthy to report on this misdemeanor of the whistleblower of the information instead, adding false aggrandizations in the process.
This reminds me of the 2016 leaks of the Democratic Party leadership obtained from hacked computers. Instead of the FBI pursuing the criminals who brazenly rigged a presidential primary, one in which the candidate with the fewest votes repeatedly received the most delegates, a revelation of such corruption that the people involved resigned in humiliation from their lofty positions at the disclosure of their unethical behavior, the federal “policing agency” chose alternately to start a prosecutorial investigation into those who merely released the condemning information of the illegal acts, rather than pursue those who actually committed the unlawfulness in the first place! What a sad, sad joke. How on earth my personal error on a random street became so quickly known and disseminated to the press, I have no idea. Someone, somewhere is keeping up with my every move. Why would this be necessary if they really went to the moon?
We have to remember that General Motors president, James Roche, admitted during a United States Senate Investigative Hearing, that he had hired private detectives to follow consumer advocate Ralf Nader in an effort to harass and discredit him, simply for pointing out errors in the automaker’s safety. As one who is spearheading a much more horrendous revelation of the much more powerful Federal Government, you can imagine why any misstep I take in private, may mysteriously make its way to a government affiliated public forum.
My tenure of two years as news editor at an NBC affiliate has been falsely identified by my leading critic as “two months”, in an unscrupulous effort to discredit my experience. I worked there through two consecutive “Christmas” holidays and then some, so I and a dozen witnesses know better than he how long I worked there. If my leading critic has to lie to make his point, then his point is not valid to begin with, as valid points don’t need lies to support them. If he was simply “mistaken”, then his inept powers of research prove that if he cannot uncover the Truth about one simple fact in his own country, then how could he possibly discern the numerous intricacies of CIA intrigue as to what may or may not be taking place on the moon??? The great thing is, either way, his own false statements prove himself wrong on this matter.
The fact that I at one time, though no longer, drove a taxi on weekends to help pay the bills during an economic downturn, is used by some critics in a desperate attempt to negate the fact that I have been a professional filmmaker for more than thirty years, and as such, can highly discern fraudulent photography when I see it. (See a list of my films, whose budgets ranged from $2000 to $1,000,000, by clicking HERE.) If you really think about it, what these lovers of denial are saying is that if you drive a yellow car, this disqualifies you from being able to perceive Truth. Anyone who makes such a nonsensical argument to begin with, is likewise proving by their own ridiculous misstatements, that it is they who lack the ability to perceive reality.
Completely false, highly outrageous accusations have been made against me, and I regularly receive vulgar curse filled death threats . . . all for simply saying that I think the Federal Government lied to the public on at least one occasion. The fact that some people react like vicious and insane rabid dogs from a mere statement, is further proof that the statement is True, as a sword with no point causes no injury.
“The further a society drifts from the Truth,
the more it will hate those who speak it.”
Not too long ago, I interviewed the second man to not walk on the moon, Edwin “Buzz” Aldrin. He sat down with me thinking that I was going to interview him in order to help him make money off of a book he was promoting. Instead, I had a television monitor set up to ask him about the newly discovered unedited outtakes of false photography from his “moon mission”, in which he was actually the camera operator orchestrating the deception.
You have to understand, at that moment, with two professional television cameras there, a crew of about five people, as well as professional lights and microphones, Aldrin thought, for a brief moment, that the news story of his fraud had just broken worldwide! It was at this time that he exclaimed in anger (at time 8:58 – 9:11 in the sequel to my film entitled “Astronauts Gone Wild”, showcased in the link below), “And this makes you a real famous person that has discovered this and reveals all this stuff! What an ego you must have to want to propel yourself (your career) like this!” The question is, if I was wrong with my discovery, how could I become famous from exposing nothing? Therefore, this statement itself is an admission of guilt, as he didn’t say I was wrong with my revelation, rather that I had impure motives for disclosing the Truth to the world. (You can see these remarks of his in “Astronauts Gone Wild“ by clicking HERE.)
Aldrin even shouted back (at time 8:30 – 8:38), “Well you’re talking to the wrong guy! Why don’t you talk to the administrator of NASA! We’re (only) passengers! We’re guys going on a flight!” (See this remark of his by clicking HERE in “Astronauts Gone Wild“.)
As Aldrin was “only a passenger“, as he plainly stated, then that certainly means that he never piloted the lunar module to the moon’s surface as he previous claimed, because a passenger and a pilot are certainly very different from one another! (Merely orbiting the earth for eight days, entirely under the control of NASA, is what made him a passenger, not a pilot, as he firmly admitted.)
Aldrin finally remembered that I was not with “ABC” (news) as he previously believed, rather “ABC-Digital”, the name of my independent television production company at the time. At this point, when he realized that the discovery of the fraud was isolated, by a lone television producer, not yet to be broadcast worldwide by a major television network, he started backpedaling on his admission of guilt and started to reassert, though not very convincingly, his mission’s alleged authenticity. When Aldrin finally realized that he had made a critical error in judgment by acknowledging twice, with the above two statements, that I was right in regard to my discovery of the Truth, he threatened to sue me if I showed his admissions of guilt to anyone. Certainly if these two statements were not admissions of guilt, he would have no problem releasing them to the public. (See Aldrin’s threat of a lawsuit at time 10:11 – 10:18 in “Astronauts Gone Wild“ by clicking HERE.)
Seeing how my job as a filmmaker of more than thirty years is to make fake scenes look real, this specific expertise of mine is how I first discerned that the “moon missions” were filmed inside of a television studio with electrical light, rather than with sunlight on a natural exterior landscape as falsely claimed. In fact, more than two decades ago, in showing a colleague of mine, with many more years of professional filmmaking experience than I had at the time, a recent dramatic film I had just completed, he complimented me by saying, “I really liked the way you captured the sunset at the end of your movie.” I smiled and said, “That was actually an electrical light, not the sun.”
In the case of the “moon” scenes that were allegedly lit solely with the bright sunlight on the atmosphereless moon, the shadows from one object, or person, compared to another, should always, without exception, run parallel with one another and never intersect. Yet, in several of the photographs allegedly taken on the moon, shadows from one object or person run at a different angel than the other and eventually intersect. This would absolutely never happen in sunlight, as the sun, the alleged only light source in the “moon” pictures, is one million times bigger in volume than the Earth, and therefore evenly lights in the exact same direction of any given area.
See the direction of the SHADOWS below.
According to NASA, no electrical lighting whatsoever was used on any of the “moon missions”, simply because of allegedly being on a heavenly body in very bright sunlight, which doesn’t have clouds or atmosphere, made supplemental lighting completely unnecessary and a waste of precious electrical power. In fact, according to NASA, because the moon has no atmosphere of any kind, the sunlight there is twenty times brighter than on Earth, so the last thing any photographer on the moon would need is an electrical light that would cast intersecting shadows!
In the now infamous “National Geographic” television special on how the moon landing hoax was supposed to not be a hoax at all, in a vain attempt to bury the emerging Truth (the program of which they subsequently removed from Youtube because I exposed the following blatant deception of theirs immediately after its broadcast), they went to a California desert at night to “simulate” the alleged conditions on the moon. They dressed up an actor in an “astronaut” costume, had them stand a few feet apart from a television crewmember, brought in one electrical light to simulate the sun, and basically said, “See! The shadows of the two people standing near one another DO intersect in our ‘moon simulation’, so filmmaker Bart Sibrel is wrong!”
The point is, their shadows in their little demonstration intersected because their “moon simulation” was lit with electrical light! . . . All the while they claimed that this proved that the moon missions were real, when their very demonstration proved that the moon missions were FAKE instead! Think about it! In their “moon demonstration”, with electrical light, the shadows DID intersect, just like some of the “moon” pictures, right? Yet, they said, “These results directly contradict the conspiracy claims” (which are that the pictures from NASA on the “moon” were lit with electrical light, not sunlight). They told this blatant lie in a deceptive attempt to confuse the viewer from seeing the Truth, when in fact, these very results of theirs PROVED the conspiracy claims to be TRUE rather than false!
Do you see this?!?!
They went to the desert at night, allegedly, to get a black background like on the moon, yet this was not the point of the experiment! The point of the experiment was to see which of the two casts parallel shadows: SUNLIGHT (as claimed by NASA) or ELECTRICAL LIGHT (as claimed by me), because the assertion I made in my film was that the reason the shadows intersect in some of the NASA pictures is because they were lit with electrical light in a television studio instead of sunlight outside on the moon as they falsely claimed, where the shadows would NEVER intersect!
Did you get this?
I discovered a copy I made of their one time broadcast (later pulled from Youtube because I exposed their deception) and uploaded this devious attempt of theirs to lie through their teeth to the viewer. Here it is:
Click HERE to see how they lie to prove a lie.
The “National Geographic” Channel (a propaganda arm of the United States government) simulated the “moon” pictures (matched them) by using ELECTRICAL LIGHT NOT SUNLIGHT, which means that the Apollo pictures were taken with ELECTRICAL LIGHT, not sunlight, meaning they were TAKEN ON EARTH! . . . All the while they tried to mislead the audience into believing the exact opposite of the Truth, that this deceptive “evidence” of theirs proved the moon mission’s authenticity, when in fact this exact evidence proves the exact opposite, that the NASA pictures were ALSO taken with electrical light, and this is precisely why the shadows intersected in their reenactment, because the “moon” pictures were also taken on Earth with Electrical light, likewise causing intersecting shadows!
The National Geographic program further lied in their “special” when they said “only a very small group of people believe that the moon missions were fraudulent”. Really??? Is 60 million of 300 million Americans a “very small group” ??? (Not to mention approximately 4 BILLION others in other non-brainwashed countries that know the facts!) If the group of believers of the Truth is so “very small” as they falsely claimed, then what is the esteemed “National Geographic” Channel doing wasting an entire expensive hour of television, and tens of thousands of dollars in production costs, trying to convince such a “small minority” out of their “crazy” and “insignificant” error, or are these extensive resources being spent because of the growing millions who are awakening to their senses, that networks like these are trying to keep the multitudes perpetually deceived.
Their own “expert” on the program, as to the “moon landing’s” alleged authenticity, the one of such astuteness that he proved my film right when he was trying to prove it wrong, admitted that his life’s work is to convince people that the “moon landings” were real. Why would this be anyone’s life’s work if the “moon missions” were so “unquestionably real”, the numbers opposed to him were so “very small”, and the people opposed to his belief were merely “crazy” as the program insinuated? Would you spend your entire life’s energy trying to convince crazy people who thought that the country’s first president was Mickey Mouse that it was really George Washington?! Of course not! The amount of time, energy, and expensive resources spent on this and a hundred other films and websites to convince accused defective simpletons of the self-proclaimed “obviousness” of the alleged moon landings, itself speaks of a deliberate alternate agenda.
Even the scene at time 30:38 – 31:06 in “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon” (Click HERE to view), in which the astronauts appear to be “floating” around in 1/6th gravity, is so obviously a simple, yet very convincing, “slow motion” effect, that when they showed the clip in the deceptive “National Geographic” program they deliberately “zoomed in” far past the soles of the astronaut’s feet touching the ground in the original NASA footage, in a blatant attempt to conceal this condemning evidence, because showing the original clip of the bottoms of their feet only getting an inch or two off of the ground, would have conclusively proved that they were on Earth and not on the moon, where they should have been able to leap a yard (meter) or more high because of the much lighter gravity! When you simply double the speed of the footage with professional video equipment, it becomes blatantly obvious that the seemingly convincing “1/6th gravity floating effect” is nothing more than a rudimentary “slow motion” effect. Truly, this alone proves that they are not on the moon, rather on Earth!
“Myth Busters” did the very same thing as the “National Geographic” special, by lighting their simulated “moonscape” with electrical light rather than sunlight, in an inverted attempt to prove the “reality” of the government photographs with intersecting shadows and other lighting anomalies, conclusively demonstrating once again that the “moon” pictures were lit with electrical light, not sunlight as NASA claimed, as only electrical lights, not sunlight, casts intersecting shadows with similar inconsistencies, meaning that the pictures were taken on Earth, as no electrical lights were brought to the moon. Why they, like the others, did not use sunlight to simulate sunlight is beyond me, unless the real intention was to deceptively mislead the television viewers into wrongly believing this “reenactment” of theirs with electrical light proved the mission’s authenticity, when this very methodology actually proves the exact opposite, as they duplicated the intersecting shadows of the “moon” pictures and other anomalies with electrical light rather than sunlight, proving that the “moon” pictures were also lit with electrical light rather than sunlight, therefore likewise taken inside of a television studio on Earth, all the while they too lied to their audience saying that their deceptive technique proved the exact opposite!
As before, if this misrepresentation was intentional, then deliberately lying to make a contested point proves that their position is false to begin with. If such an inversion of the Truth was accidental, then it proves their complete incompetence on the subject. Either way, it proves that the “moon landings” were indeed false, completely contrary to their misleading presentation.
It was when I pointed out these deceptions of theirs that the producers of these shows (who were NASA surrogates) recanted to have me on their programs or deleted my previously recorded interviews from their content, because not only could I prove on national television that the “moon landings” were fraudulent beyond any doubt, I would have also exposed their blatantly deceptive methodology to make their misleading points to a beguiled public, something they were not about to allow me to do.
If a television program about the moon landing “conspiracy theory” (really produced to reassure the public that it was not a deliberate deception against mounting evidence to the contrary) refuses to have on their show the world’s leading advocate on this very subject, or deliberately deletes conclusive evidence from him of the fraud from their content, how can they at all be trusted to be presenting the Truth in the first place? If the “moon landings” were so obviously real and incontestable as they falsely claim, then they would let me speak uncensored about their fraudulent methodology, and show the newly discovered, and highly condemning, unedited video evidence in its entirety, without any fear whatsoever!
Do you have eyes that perceive . . .
or only eyes which see what the magician wants you to see?
NBC, my old alma mater, for a program on their “Discovery Channel”, paid me thousands of dollars, flew me to New York City, put me up in the very expensive Waldorf Astoria hotel, all because a new, independent-minded, producer of theirs wanted to air my side of the story, as well as exclusively showcase the first network broadcast of the newly discovered unedited video evidence of behind-the-scenes photographic fraud from the first “moon mission”. When NASA got wind of their intended broadcast of my recorded interview introducing this condemning footage to an awakened American audience (how they found out is a mystery to me), they threatened NBC with permanently disconnecting their live camera aboard the International Space Station as retaliation. (Remember, another NBC news director previously viewed the very same evidence and promptly concluded that it conclusively proved the moon landing fraud, though disappointedly said, “I cannot air this. It will cause a civil war”.)
Seeing how the Discovery Channel and NBC regularly used and boasted about video feeds from this camera of theirs on the International Space Station on numerous ongoing television programs, they succumbed to the NASA threat, and never aired the interview they filmed of me painstakingly explaining the newly discovered condemning NASA footage, which they had already purchased exclusive rights to, even though it cost them tens of thousands of dollars of loss in the process.
Do you still believe there is a free press outside of government control?
I was even once invited to the NASA launch headquarters in Florida as an official member of the press, with personalized credentials, a formal written invitation, and a scheduled appointment, yet when I asked an “Apollo” astronaut to confirm that he actually left Earth orbit (because I had newly discovered evidence to the contrary), I was promptly, and forcibly, removed from the public property by security forces, with the threat of arrest if I persisted with my questions. If you had been there and witnessed this firsthand as I and my camera crew did, you would have sworn that we were in oppressive North Korea or China, rather than the “free” United States of America, with an alleged “free” press.
The only television program to ever broadcast the newly discovered condemning footage of unedited outtakes of false photography from the first “moon mission”, with its most revealing secret audio channel of the CIA prompting the astronauts during their deception, was “Tech TV’s” enormously popular cable talk show “Unscrewed”, who mistakenly did so without prior executive approval. In fact, the show was so successful, that their viewership doubled every thirty days for the first two years it was on the air! Despite being the highest rated program on the entire network, bringing in the owners of the channel untold millions of dollars, the show was abruptly canceled immediately after airing this inflammatory footage of the NASA forgery, especially with the audience reaction of horror and indignation. This cancellation was a not so subtle warning to other broadcasters who might make the same error in judgment. Since then, knowing this penalty of termination hanging over their heads, no other network has dared to air, on any of their programs, any condemning portions of this monumental evidence, which emphatically proves that the “moon missions” never left Earth orbit.
Click HERE to watch the interview.
The simple Truth is, if I really walked on the moon with indisputable evidence, and someone thought otherwise, I would find that hysterically funny! If someone asked me to swear on the Bible to that “fact”, why in the world would I object to taking an oath of such an “obvious” event? Instead, the astronauts in question reacted to the request as if I walked up to them in the company of their wife and asked them how their hidden mistress was doing! If they really walked on the moon, me saying otherwise would be like throwing a feather at them! Why would anyone be violently mad at someone for throwing a feather at them? If, on the other hand, I were exposing a real crime of infidelity that they had gotten away with for decades and built lifelong reputations on, then you could certainly see why they would react with such violent hatred. (See these revealing reactions at time 00:00 – 2:00 in “Astronauts Gone Wild” by clicking HERE.)
I even met privately with “investigative journalist” Geraldo Rivera in New York City to personally give him a copy of “A Funny Thing happened on the Way to the Moon“, which includes the newly discovered condemning video evidence. While I later appeared as a guest on his show on an anniversary of the event, he made it clear to me that though he may be personally suspicious of the “moon missions” authenticity, he is not able to say so publicly and keep his job. The only way that I could appear and present my case on his program was if I did not show the NUMBER ONE key piece of evidence of the fraud. Why would this matter . . . if they really went to the moon? Instead of debuting the recently uncovered absolute proof of the fraud, Geraldo chose to sensationalize the violence I received in pursuit of the Truth. Subsequently, one has to question his credentials as a real “investigative journalist”, rather than a Pop-Culture propagandist, when he privately confided in me that he knows the Truth and refuses to share it with the public, whom he claims to look out for.
Click HERE to view Sibrel on “Geraldo at Large”.
The same is True of the “New York Times”. While “investigate reporter” John Schwartz interviewed me in-depth on the topic of the moon landing fraud, the story which he actually wrote was about “how interesting it is that some people doubt the moon landings“, rather than an actual investigation into possibility that indeed the missions were a Cold War deception. When I asked him about the newly discovered condemning video evidence of the astronauts staging their photography of being “halfway to the moon” when they were still in earth orbit, he replied, “I can’t explain that“, and then went on to say that such an investigation along these lines would result in his termination by his superiors.
“USA Today”, along with many other newspapers, television and radio stations, “reviewed” my documentary “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon”, yet repeatedly toted the party line. In each and every case, when I tracked down the actual person who wrote the critical review and asked them, “What did you think about the newly discovered unedited footage of false photography from Apollo 11 showcased in my movie?”, they replied, “Well . . . I didn’t actually watch the movie. I wrote the review on the concept of the film, not the actual content.” The fact is, four out of five people who actually watch the forty-seven minute documentary, with the condemning new evidence debuted in it, reverse their opinion as to the “moon missions” authenticity!!!
“Professional” “journalists”, for major magazines and television stations, write reviews about films that they don’t even watch?!?! . . . Can you believe this?!?! Why aren’t people like this fired for incompetence or dereliction of duty, instead of being promoted to positions of national media authority???
Four networks, so far, have paid thousands of dollars for the exclusive license to broadcast this newly discovered amazing NASA footage, only to be told at the eleventh hour NOT TO DO IT by senior network executives (who are likely under the direct influence of the United States government, whose criminality would be exposed by airing it). The BBC did this very thing only three days before its scheduled broadcast, after they had licensed the condemning footage nearly a year in advance at the cost of thousands of dollars! I was informed that a senior US government official telephoned the president of the BBC and put pressure on them not to air the program. The BBC even bribed the executive producer of my film with additional thousands of dollars to sign a contract not to publicize their recanting and the reason for it.
In fact, this executive producer of which I spoke, who wishes to remain anonymous, who put up approximately a million dollars to help produce these two films of mine exposing the moon landing fraud, has an IQ nearing 200 and is a board member of an aerospace company which is presently building rockets for NASA! Wouldn’t such a person know whether the “moon landings” of the 1960’s were possible or not??? Of course they would! THEY DO KNOW! They KNOW that they were FAKE, a Cold War bluff against the Soviet Union, as well as a domestic “pep rally” for the Nixon administration during the Vietnam War’s detrimental national protests. They KNOW, from an engineering standpoint, that 1960’s NASA “low bid” equipment that barely put a man in orbit for the first time only a few years earlier, could NEVER have successfully landed on the moon on their first attempt with 1960’s technology, especially considering the fact that the feat cannot be repeated today with fifty years of more advanced computers and rockets!
Although the technology allegedly used to “put a man on the moon” was not classified, because the missions were “supposed” to have been done by a non-military “civilian” government agency (NASA), the specific blueprints of the hypothetically miraculous machinery, according to NASA, are nevertheless “unavailable”. This is because all of the flight telemetry data, as well as all of the technical specifications of the “Apollo” spacecraft, were deliberately destroyed by NASA after the “moon missions”! You would think that such important, one of a kind, and supremely valuable and expensive designs, at a cost of FORTY BILLION DOLLARS, would be kept for just short of all eternity, in case such costly to attain information would be needed again in the future . . . Yet the exact opposite is the case.
How did the lunar lander power air-conditioning against an outside temperature of 252 degrees Fahrenheit (122 C) down to an amazing 72 degrees Fahrenheit (22 C) inside a boiling spacecraft for three days nonstop with a bank of, essentially, car batteries? No one will ever know! All of the schematics and electrical diagrams of the lunar lander were deliberately destroyed! How did the “moon” rocket go 1000 times farther than the space shuttle with decades less advanced technology? No one will ever know! The rocket diagrams and blueprints were removed from the national archives and are nowhere to be found!
All of this was done so that if a curious and astute propulsion or electrical engineering student in the future were to do the actual mathematical calculations, they would not be able to expose the fact that the “lunar lander”, in reality, did not have the electrical battery capacity necessary to power the air-conditioning down 180 degrees Fahrenheit (82 C) from the outside temperature, nonstop for three days, nor did the main “Apollo” rocket have the fuel necessary to leave Earth orbit to begin with, as the newly uncovered video evidence clearly proves by the crew’s falsification of being halfway to the moon!
Don’t believe me? Watch the video clip below in which I read the super intelligent “Apollo” rocket designer’s original mathematical calculations to “moon” astronaut Eugene Cernan as to the only way possible to reach the moon, a methodology which NASA never used. (You can see Cernan squirm as he realizes that he has just been caught in a lie.) Wernher von Braun, the astute mathematician and rocket scientist, said this regarding the ONLY way to reach the moon:
“It is commonly (and falsely) believed that men will fly directly from the Earth to the moon, but to do this we would require a vehicle of such gigantic proportions that it would prove an economic impossibility. CALCULATIONS HAVE BEEN CAREFULLY WORKED OUT on the type of vehicle we would need for the (theoretical) nonstop flight from the Earth to the moon and to return. THE FIGURES SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES: THREE rockets would be necessary, EACH rocket ship would (need to) be TALLER THAN THE EMPIRE STATE BUILDING (1250 FEET) and weigh about TEN TIMES the tonnage of the Queen Mary (or some 800,000 TONS).”
The “moon” rocket the United States Government could afford weighed just 2500 tons (a difference of 32,000 percent) and was just 363 feet tall . . . and there was just one of them, rather than THREE. Furthermore, Braun went on to say that a Space Station must be constructed before a manned mission to the moon, from which to ferry the three rockets to the moon and back. (The International Space Station was not completed until 2011.) Braun further insisted that after once landing on the moon, crews would have to find or dig a cave in which to shelter from thousands of micrometeorites per hour hitting the moon’s surface traveling at speeds in excess of 20,000 miles per hour, which would inevitably puncture the spacecraft, as well as the astronaut’s spacesuit, causing catastrophic, and fatal, environmental decompression. This, of course, like the other requirements, was never done.
When the government told the man in charge of the “moon” rocket to adjust his numbers “a little bit” to reflect a fictitious way to reach the moon with the available resources and technology of the time, he immediately, and obediently, dramatically recanted. Did I mention that this man in charge of the “moon” program’s authenticity, Wernher von Braun, was a former World War Two Nazi whom our own government’s State Department is on the record for saying that, had he not prematurely died shortly after the “moon missions”, he would have been immediately thereafter indicted for War Crimes for overseeing the genocide, and the cover-up thereof, of hundreds of innocent people during the war? This threat of blackmail was obviously used to gain his obedient submission to the government deception and his “adjustment” of irrefutable mathematical calculations.
Not only are all of the specifications, blueprints, and telemetry data of the miraculous NASA 1960’s technology that allegedly went to the moon on the very first attempt nowhere to be found because it was all intentionally destroyed, all of the original television transmission videotapes, estimated to weigh about two tons, have also been mysteriously “lost” inside the Federally Secured National Archives! Why? Because naïve director Ron Howard, whose own wise grandfather warned him that the “moon missions” were staged, requested that all of the original videotapes be transferred to High Definition for an I-Max documentary he was producing to gleefully commemorate the “moon missions”, as he believed, at that time, that they were real. Prior to Howard’s request, the highest quality version of the television footage that anyone had ever seen was deliberately fourth generation (a copy, of a copy, of a copy, of a copy), in order to disguise the falsification detail of the fake “moon” landscapes.
When this moon-landing-believing prominent film director asked for the original NASA videotapes of all of the “moon walks” to be transferred to High Definition, in order to be projected for the first time in history onto a screen that was nearly 120 feet by 100 feet, for all the world to see at a resolution that was at least four times greater in detail than had ever before been witnessed, within days of his request, ALL of the original videotapes vanished from the Federal Archives!!! But of course, we still went to the moon, right?
Proof of this bewildering predicament, is that when Howard’s documentary commemorating the “moon missions” was finally produced without this essential material, he resorted to filling about 95 percent of his landmark film with “reenactments” of the “moon walks”, which he likewise filmed in a television studio. In fact, there was so little actual original footage available of the alleged greatest event of the 20th century, that this multimillion dollar director had to resort to renting VHS tapes of other filmmaker’s previous work at Blockbuster Video in order to have at least some of the vanishing NASA footage! He was so ashamed of the low quality of the images that he was forced to use, because of the scarcity of them, that he reduced their size within the nearly 120 foot by 100 foot screen to only about 10 percent of the available space.
In case you were wondering “what if”, someday, the mysteriously vanished original videotapes were to one day be found? . . . Oops! . . . Did I forget to tell you? . . . The only machine on the entire planet that could ever play these one of a kind format videotapes was deliberately disassembled and destroyed by NASA, right after the original tapes got “misplaced”, making that scenario absolutely impossible!
As various nations and private enterprises finally, after nearly fifty years, have the capability to send microwave oven sized probes to the moon (still no men), NASA has quickly drafted regulations to keep their alleged manned landing sites of the Nixon administration completely off-limits. They have said that any flyovers of these locations, or ground incursions thereof, by probes of any nations, including their own, to prove or disprove their authenticity, are strictly forbidden. (Since when does the US government own the moon?) You would think that they would gladly welcome independent proof (which there has never been) that their outrageous scientific claims of 1960’s technology were real (even though the feat cannot be repeated today), especially in the face of growing universal doubt to the contrary, yet the exact opposite proves to be the case. (It is like a murderer who boasts of their innocence, all the while refusing to give a personal DNA sample, when they know full well that incriminating DNA evidence was left by them at the crime scene.)
China, a trillion dollar trading partner of the United States, recently sent an un-manned probe to the moon. As all of the moon is uniformly desolate and one landing site is just about as good as any other for exploration, I would think that the perfect and most logical place to land would be that of the United States’ alleged first “moon mission”, to prove to the world that their probe was really on the moon. Yet if the American government’s “moon landing” artifacts are not there themselves, this might be biting the trillion dollar trading-partner hand that feeds them. Subsequently, China steered clear of any supposed NASA “moon landing” sites for any of their lunar probes, even though these were the most logical places to land.
Astrobotic Technology, a private firm, had planned to land an unmanned probe precisely at the claimed “Apollo 11” landing site, as they too saw this as the most logical choice to prove that they were really there, yet because of pressure from NASA not to do so, and subsequently embarrass the organization and nation for not having really landed on the moon in the first place, the president of the company, John Thornton, caved in and agreed not to land there as originally planned, even though the moon is owned by no one and he was “free” to do so. (Is it freedom when scientific exploration is completely altered because of political pressure to maintain a falsehood from a government agency?)
If putting a man on the moon is supposed to be “the greatest achievement of mankind”, then certainly not doing it, lying about it to the entire world, embezzling tens of billions of dollars in the process, deceiving and misleading college students, high school students, scientists, academics, congress, the senate, and future space pioneers who will endanger their lives thinking it was so easy to go to the moon in the 1960’s on the very first attempt, then this event, the falsification of the moon landings, out of pride, greed, and arrogance, is REALLY one of the most profound events in human history. The falsification of the moon landings is more profound historically, than if they had actually gone.
Do you see this?
This Great Truth, as to the TRUE nature of mankind, the deceptive, arrogant, and criminal nature, is being withheld from the majority, by the few people at the top, because they are the once who committed the crime in the first place and think that they are better than the rest of us! This Great Truth, which would humble mankind into changing our character for the better before it is too late, is being withheld from the public, like a cure for cancer, the very disclosure of which would bring about its recovery, and without which, our moral and intellectual growth will be forever stunted.
I am often criticized by my fellow countrymen as “unpatriotic” for saying that the “glorious” American “moon landings” were a Cold War deception, even though this is the sad, unwanted Truth. Our country has hopelessly descended into a realm where Liars are heroes, and Truth Speakers are traitors. If George Washington arose from his grave today and saw all of this unspeakable corruptive depravity, he would grab the first ship back to England. He repeatedly told the painstakingly detailed unflattering Truth of the desperateness of the situation of his Continental Army against the vastly outnumbered and better equipped British troops, to a congress, that even at that early historic hour, wanted to hear flowery lies of success instead of unpleasant realities. Our leaders have gone from “I can never tell a lie”, to practically lying all of the time. It is not unpatriotic to expose corruption, it is unpatriotic to commit the corruption in the first place.
Just as Hitler’s children, if he had any, would have a hard time seeing dear old papa as anything but a benevolent patriarch, mired tunnel-visioned prideful “intellectuals” and misdirected beguiled deluded “patriots” will seldom admit that their enamored “scientific” community and “glorious” government can be just as corrupt as pedophile priest. The fact remains, if all the scientists from all the nations on earth cannot go to the moon today with fifty years of newer computer and rocketry technology, it simply means, and it cannot mean anything else, that America did not go to the moon in the 1960’s. Technology does not go backwards! It is so obvious to anyone with an open mind who does not have a religious attachment to the blasphemous event.
“God opposes the proud, yet gives grace to the humble.”
“Tell my people their transgression.”
“Apollyon” (the origin of “Apollo”) means
“The Devil” or “Deceiver”
“The Truth will set you free.”
“Have I become your enemy by telling you the Truth?”
“The further a society drifts from the Truth,
the more it will hate those who speak it.”
Shop on Amazon by clicking on the Button below
Bart Sibrel is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com
When you want to shop on Amazon, please come back to this page and click on the large Button ABOVE to visit the Amazon homepage, or copy and paste the following url into your browser’s bookmarks as “Amazon” to save for future shopping use (http://amzn.to/2bvcs9I).
Click HERE to see Sibrel’s rare Unedited Interview.