As any filmmaker will tell you, the secret to the presentation, is in the editing. In my recent interview for England’s Channel 5, my one hundred minute interview, meticulously detailing how and why the touted American “moon landings” originating in the 1960’s were actually a Cold War deception of the infamous Nixon administration, was edited down to a mere two minutes.
To be quite honest, there is not a single television network that is actually interested in disclosing to the public the very sad fact that the American “moon landings” were, indeed, a well-orchestrated government deception. If they did so, then these networks (whose sole purpose is to control public opinion for the governments of the world) would be openly rebelling against their very own benefactors, the same governments in power which hold their licenses to operate. Subsequently, in such a case as this, the television network’s real intent is to squash the growing public realization that if the technology does not exist today to go to the moon (otherwise there would be bases there by now), then how could the technology possibly have existed way back in the 1960’s, some five decades ago, before the advent of the microwave oven or cell phone?
Claiming to have traveled to the moon on the very first attempt in a 1960’s designed spacecraft, when all that manned space travelers can do today with fifty years more advanced technology is to travel only 1/1000th of the distance to the moon (to the space station which only orbits two hundred fifty miles above the earth), is quite a claim indeed. Scientific doctrine requires that outrageous claims of technological “firsts” must be independently verified and replicated by a third party in order to be counted as feasible and genuine. This was never done regarding the alleged “moon landings” of the 1960’s. The only evidence provided was the testimony of three government employees of the notoriously corrupt Nixon administration, and a low definition black and white television picture (even though “Gilligan’s Island” found it worthy to convert to more detailed higher resolution color television pictures five years earlier, and they with less of a technological budget or reputation than NASA).
The “scientific community”, in their emotional ecstasy to pat themselves on the back for being so capable, threw out their own strict guidelines for independent verification and duplication, as if counting the potentially counterfeit ten thousand dollar cash wedding gift at the reception in front of their affluently questionable father-in-law was an insult. They willingly assumed the complete integrity of the data they were presented with, without question, simply because that was their preferred world to live in, one in which their profession was superior, rather than corrupt. Later, when serious questions arose as to the authenticity of the “moon landing” data, in their pride to have not been wrong in the first place, the “scientific community” started making one preposterous defense after another, much like O.J. Simpson’s legal team, as to why blatantly condemning evidence to the crime was not, as it should be, overtly implicating the guilt of the party involved. The more that time goes by, the more reluctant they are to give up their long held positions, no matter how wrong they are.
Their own heralded top scientist, Carl Sagan, had this to say about their self-induced “science-trance” . . .
“One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we’ve been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We’re no longer interested in finding out the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It’s simply too painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we’ve been taken. Once you give a charlatan power over you, you almost never get it back.”
One of the greatest writers of all time, Mark Twain, put it this way . . .
“It is easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.”
Now that the world has been so successfully lulled into a habit-forming hypnosis of the mainstream media though such mesmerizing “televised” events as the “moon landings”, England’s Channel 5, as well as numerous recent other television networks, not only re-run continually documentaries showing the “glory” of the falsified “moon landings” to reinforce the previous brainwashing, they specifically produce programs to meet the growing truthful opposition head-on, to reassure and pacify the awakening public that they were not deceived by their governments and television networks regarding the “moon landings”, that they are instead, fully worthy of continued unreserved trust, because if the truth came out, they would no longer be.
For those interested in my full interview, as to why and how the “moon landings” were indeed falsified, click below on the Youtube Link of the never-before-seen unedited interview in its entirety.