New Information Suggests Guccifer 2.0 Leak was a DNC Ruse Fabricated by “Warren Flood”

New Information Suggests Guccifer 2.0 Leak was a DNC Ruse Fabricated by “Warren Flood” | computer-server-1024x681 | Sleuth Journal US News Whistle Blowers
(image: grover_net/Flickr)

By: Shepard Ambellas, Intellihub

Whoever created the files from Guccifer 2.0 did it using a version of Microsoft Office registered to “Warren Flood”.

The Democratic National Committee (DNC) claims that it was the so-called Russian hacker Guccifer 2.0 and not the murdered DNC staffer Seth Rich who hacked into the DNC servers and gave Wikileaks the emails which later revealed how the DNC rigged the Primary against Senator Bernie Sanders to thrust Hillary Clinton into the forefront.

Now, new evidence has emerged which proves that either:

a. That Guccifer 2.0 is not the Russian hacker as the DNC claims
b. That Guccifer 2.0 was set up by the DNC to be a patsy and may be a legitimate hacker

According to a new video posted to the Mike Cerovich YouTube channel, narrated by Devon Stack: “There’s evidence to suggest that Guccifer 2.0 isn’t a Russian hacker as the DNC claims but rather an invention of someone using software registered to the DNC, a staffer named Warren Flood.”

The videos narrator goes on to point out how Warren Flood is a “tech worker” who has previously worked for organizations such as Obama For America, the DNC, and even the White House. But even more shocking is the fact that whoever created the files from Guccifer 2.0 did it using a version of Microsoft Office registered to “Warren Flood.”

The metadata embedded within the Wikileaks emails, when compared to the metadata released by ‘Guccifer 2.0,’ doesn’t match up and is not the same (i.e. the files released by Guccifer 2.0 are not the same files released by Wikileaks). What the metadata actually shows is that the Wikileaks files clearly were taken from DNC Research Director Lauren Dillon’s computer and not Warren Floods who used Microsoft Office to create the document.

So how does all of this tie in?

Keep in mind that, still, to this day, the FBI has never inspected the DNC’s servers. This fact was admitted by Fmr. FBI Director James Comey in his recent hearing.

“In the case of the DNC and I believe the D-triple-C, but I’m sure the DNC, we did not have access to the devises themselves,” Comey testified, proving that nobody has ever inspected the DNC servers.

A timeline of events according to the video, as follows:

  • June 14, 2016: The DNC announced that it had been hacked, the Washington Post suggested “the Russians” did it
  • June 15, 2016: Crowdstrike, the company paid by the DNC to maintain its servers, also blamed the attack on the Russians
  • June 15, 2016: Guccifer 2.0 appeared on the Internet claiming responsibility for the DNC hack, releases opposition research on Trump
  • June 15, 2016: Vice releases opposition research on Trump
  • Aug. 9, 2016: Wikileaks offered a “$20K reward for information leading to conviction for the murder of DNC staffer Seth Rich”
  • Aug. 25, 2016: A chat between Guccifer 2.0 and actress Robin Young appeared on the internet in which Guccifer 2.0 admits he got the info from Seth Rich and that Wikileaks Julian Assange is in cahoots with the Russians. Robin Young later claimed that all of her direct messages were missing.

As pointed out by Stack, the new evidence “further illustrates how baseless the Russian conspiracy theory is and casts suspicion on none other than the DNC and possibly even the [Obama] White House.”

#SethRich

Via Intellihub

©2017. INTELLIHUB.COM. All Rights Reserved.

Shepard Ambellas is an opinion journalist, analyst, and the founder and editor-in-chief of Intellihub News & Politics (Intellihub.com). Shepard is also known for producing Shade: The Motion Picture (2013) and appearing on Travel Channel’s America Declassified (2013). Shepard is a regular contributor to Infowars. Read more from Shep’s World. Get the Podcast. Follow Shep on Facebook and Twitter.

Submit your review
1
2
3
4
5
Submit
     
Cancel

Create your own review

About The Author

Related posts

  • libby

    For those who haven’t seen it, Adam Carter (the guy that’s been investigating Guccifer 2.0 for the last 6 months and that many of the new revelations came from) has a site at http://g-2.space that covers all the above and a lot more.

  • ICFubar

    Wouldn’t it be wonderful if we could have access to all the banking accounts of all the players in this intrigue like the intelligence agencies most likely have. At first the Trump campaign was disparaged which may have been the initial intent (pissing in Moscow) but further revelations unveiled DNC corruption. This is where ‘take no prisoners campaigning’ may have gotten out of hand leading to the theory of apex elite divisions and internecine war.

    What has never been answered is who ultimately benefits or whose bank accounts were fattened through all this intrigue? What we do see is deep divisions within the population over politics while Continuity of Agenda proceeds apace despite deference to Trump’s campaign rhetoric as theater for the proles. So perhaps the messiness of the campaign and in fighting between opposing elites groups caught up in this game has been buried and the resulting furor is being put to ‘good use’ by those who run the whole show?