Newly Discovered Document Proves NASA Moon Landing Fraud

Capricorn One 1

Charles Lindberg was the first person to fly alone nonstop from New York to Paris in an airplane. He did so in 1927.  If there is one thing that can be said of advancements in science, it is that technology does not go backwards.  Technology only increases in greater capability, with less and less time to do so than the previous year, exponentially, as the years go by.

What if I were to tell you that in 1987, sixty years after the first solo nonstop flight from New York to Paris, with all of the advancements in technology and aviation since then, from open cockpit one passenger biplanes to high altitude cabin pressurized five hundred passenger 747’s, that NO ONE, with SIX DECADES more of technological advancements since 1927, was able to repeat Lindberg’s feat?  Would this be reasonable, given the steady pace of advancement in all of the sciences and technologies from 1927 to 1987 ?

What the United States government has asked the world to believe about last century’s “Apollo” moon missions is no different than this, with sixty years after 1969 being the earliest date set to “return” to the moon, at date which has already been pushed a decade farther into the future FOUR TIMES before by NASA, and based on this track record, may very well be pushed farther into the future yet again.

It confuses many people that the most difficult aviation accomplishment in the entire history of flight was not only done successfully on the very first attempt (something which had never happened before or since in the entire history of aviation, not even for far much less intricate endeavors than this, much less the most complicated one ever imagined), that it was also so easily accomplished with the extremely rudimentary computer and rocket technology of the 1960’s, knowing too that no one, from any nation on Earth, including the one that claimed the accomplishment in 1969, has been able to duplicate the event since then, or has any capability to do so, until at least sixty years after the incredible claim.

Here in the 21st century, there have been at least a dozen catastrophic failures, from various parties, simply trying to put a rocket into earth orbit, which is 1/1000th the distance to the moon, with nearly five decades of technological advancements since the “Apollo” missions.  Thusly, you can see the ambiguity of NASA’s moon landing claim, being so easy accomplished on the very first attempt with antiquated 1960’s technology, going a thousand times farther than the most modern manned space vehicle can travel today, when the originally claimed accomplishment cannot be repeated today by any nation on Earth, even with a half a century of more advancements in aviation and computer technology.

Van Allen Belts 2

Unbeknownst to most American citizens, at about 1000 miles above the surface of the Earth, which is 750 miles above where the international space station presently orbits at just 250 miles, lay bands of lethal radiation, nearly 30,000 miles thick, called the “Van Allen Radiation Belts”, humbly named after their founder, Dr. James Van Allen, who discovered the radiation belts in 1958 by putting a Geiger counter (radiation meter) on an unmanned probe launched toward this region of space. The radiation belts are a collection of intense radioactive particles, mostly from the sun, which have collected around the Earth ever since its creation, and are permanently held there in place by the Earth’s magnetic field. The only time humans have ever claimed to have gone through this dangerous radiation field is during the “honorable” Nixon administration from 1969 to 1972, a course of travel necessary to reach the moon and return. All other manned space flights, of all time, except for the “Apollo” missions, were well below this dangerous radiation, in low Earth orbit, the very place where the space station presently safely resides.

Twenty-five years later, in 1997, when the space shuttle flew to its highest altitude ever, 380 miles, the record-breaking shuttle crew made an alarming discovery when their safety instruments notified them of the approaching radiation danger, though it was still 620 miles away. So severe was the radiation, even at more than 600 miles distance, that NASA never sent the shuttle to this hazardous altitude ever again. Because of this encounter, CNN reported at the time . . .

“The radiation belts surrounding Earth are MORE DANGEROUS THAN PREVIOUSLY BELIEVED.” (“Previously believed” being the knowledge gathered by the “Apollo” moon missions, the only ones ever to have claimed to have successfully traveled through the radiation belts.)

The question is, how could a space shuttle crew, 620 miles below the beginning of the radiation belts, have a greater knowledge of the radiation belts, from 620 miles away, than the “Apollo” crews did who claimed they were in the very heart of them eighteen times for twenty-four total hours? The only way this could happen is if the “Apollo” missions never left Earth orbit and orbited themselves well below the shuttle’s record of 380 miles, most likely at about 250 miles. This means that the “Apollo” launches and splashdowns were real, they just never left Earth orbit and the CIA falsified the rest.

In the now infamous documentary “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon” (linked below), this is exactly what newly discovered unedited footage of “Apollo” astronaut outtakes shows, the crew blatantly falsifying the cinematography of allegedly being half way to the moon, when they were in fact still in Earth orbit, all the while receiving clearly heard private directives from a third clandestine party over a confidential audio channel, telling them to wait four seconds after hearing from NASA before replying, in order to create the false impression of an increased radio delay as if they were further from the Earth than they really were.

In a 2008 article published by Reuters (link below), the National Academy of Sciences, a nonprofit think-tank which serves as a technical advisor to NASA, stated that “returning” to the moon would not be possible UNTIL AFTER the technology is developed IN THE FUTURE to protect astronauts from lethal space radiation!

Confusing the issue further, is a new young generation of NASA scientists, born after the “Apollo” missions, a spokesperson for which, Kelly Smith, publicly remarked in 2014 (link below) saying the VERY SAME THING as the National Academy of Sciences, that the Van Allen radiation belts contain “Dangerous Radiation” and that . . .

NASA must FIRST solve this challenge BEFORE we send people through this region of space.

Seeing how Smith just admitted that the technology needed to solve the radiation problem of successfully sending astronauts survivably through this dangerous region of space has YET to be invented, unless the “Apollo” crews had a time machine to access this future and still yet developed technology, they could not have possibly gone through this dangerous region of space and survived it as they previously claimed.

This statement from the new generation of NASA scientists, who were born after the “Apollo” missions, is NASA’s own indirect admission that the “Apollo” flights could not have scientifically taken place five decades ago, as the technology necessary to protect the crews from radiation beyond the safety of Earth orbit has YET to be invented.

I applaud their admission, love for the truth, and scientific integrity.

In a recently uncovered 1959 paper written by Dr. James Van Allen, for whom the radiation belts are named for their discovery (link below), after successfully launching unmanned probes with Geiger counters onboard into this region of space the previous year to measure its radioactivity, Dr. Van Allen himself testified that the radiation belts are DEADLY TO ASTRONAUTS.  Regarding the necessary travel through them to reach the moon and return, Dr. Van Allen said . . .

“Our measurements show that the maximum radiation level is between 10 and 100 roentgens (rem) per hour.  Since a human being exposed for two days to even 10 roentgens (rem) would have only a 50% chance of survival, the radiation belts obviously present an obstacle to space flight beyond earth orbit.  Rockets will need to take off from the radiation free zones at the north or south poles in order to reach the moon.”  (There are “doughnut” shaped radiation free “holes” in the belts just above the north and south poles.)

This newly discovered, and highly revealing, document from 1959, of Geiger counter readings of the Van Allen Radiation belts from unmanned probes launched in 1958, clearly states that a lethal dose of radiation is 10 rem within a 48 hour period, or about .2 rem (1/5th rem) per hour. Since Van Allen’s Geiger counters indicated that the radiation within the belts fluctuated between 10 rem and 100 rem in just a SINGLE hour, this means that the radiation inside the belts, which each “Apollo” crew claimed to be in the middle of for about two and a half hours during their round trip journey to the moon and back, would have been between 48 and 480 times MORE THAN A LETHAL DOSE, plus two and a half times again (or 120 to 1200 times a lethal dose) for their two and a half hour journey through them!!! No wonder why NASA’s new generation of scientists are trying to reveal the truth about this dangerous radiation field, otherwise future crews attempting to leave Earth orbit and travel through them will be killed by believing their departed elder’s Cold War lies about them!

How can NASA deny their own findings from their own probes?

A few years later, under pressure from the White House because of the administration’s inability to build weather sensitive launch centers in such frigid arctic conditions at the north and south poles, Dr. Van Allen recanted his testimony and these scientific findings of the deadly radiation readings, in order to make the “Apollo” missions appear feasible.  Nevertheless, these recently uncovered historical Geiger counter readings from 1958 speak for themselves and do not lie, even if men later do.

I understand the fascination and marvel with space flight.  I am a big fan of it myself.  At the same time, as with anything overly adored, the object of one’s infatuation can take advantage of this entranced state of their admirer and feed them, unwittingly, false flattery that is sincerely mistaken as factual.

The United States government, as well as the Johnson and the Nixon administration in particular, which was at the helm during the whole “Apollo” endeavor, had a proven track record of falsification, during this very hour of American history.  In fact, the CIA, NSA, and former defense secretary Robert McNamara admitted, many decades later to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, that the entire Vietnam War was instigated because of an elaborate hoax of theirs known as the “Gulf of Tonkin Incident” (link below), which was an entirely fabricated attack by the North Vietnamese against the United States, created to garner public support for the unpopular war.

It is my belief, that when domestic civil unrest about the Vietnam War was ready to oust the newly installed Nixon administration, another event was also contrived by the CIA as a patriotic distraction and Cold War boast to the Soviet Union, that of a successful moon mission, the success of which could only be guaranteed by staging it safely below the lethal radiation belts.

Just as there are bases at the South Pole, despite nearly 100 degrees below zero temperatures and 100 mile per hour winds, there because it is technologically possible, if it were humanly possible to put men on the moon, there would be scientific bases there right now.  The fact that there are not, is proof itself that it cannot yet be done . . . much less, five decades ago.

“One of the saddest lessons of history is this:

If we’ve been bamboozled long enough,

we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle.

We’re no longer interested in finding out the truth.

The bamboozle has captured us.

It’s simply too painful to acknowledge,

even to ourselves,

that we’ve been taken.

Once you give a charlatan power over you,

you almost never get it back.”

Carl Sagan

“It is easier to fool people

than to convince them that they have been fooled.”

-Mark Twain-

  

In this week’s episode ofConspiracy Corner News

I will discuss this very topic.

Just Click on the Youtube Link Below to Watch

Brother Bart-

 Donate



References

 National Academy of Sciences Admits Moon Missions Impossible Today

NASA Employee Admits Radiation Belts Prohibit Manned Moon Travel

Newly Discovered Document Proves NASA Moon Landing Fraud

Documentary: “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon”

CIA Admits Vietnam War Motivator Was Completely Fabricated


Bart Sibrel is an award winning filmmaker, writer and investigative journalist who has been producing movies and television programs for years. During this time he has owned five production companies, been employed by two of the three major networks and produced films shown on ABC, NBC, CNN, TLC, USA, BET, as well as The Tonight Show with Jay Leno. To discuss his films, he has appeared and been interviewed on The Daily Show, Geraldo, NBC, CNN, FOX, Tech TV, Coast to Coast, and The Abrams Report. Articles featuring Mr. Sibrel’s films have been published in Time Magazine, The New York Times, The Washington Post, The L.A. Times, USA Today and many others. His top awards from the American Motion Picture Society include “Best Cinematography”, “Best Editing” and “Top Ten Director”. As the writer and director of the infamous “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon” which exposed the moon landing hoaxMr. Sibrel has collected over the years innumerous military, government, industrial and private sources for credible firsthand verification of very real conspiratorial crimes against humanity. He will use these contacts and experience in exposing the true and unbelievably horrific intentions of the hidden minority who have diabolical intentions for mankind in his monthly Sleuth Journal column Conspiracy Corner“. When such concepts are speculative and unverified, Mr. Sibrel will acknowledge this and openly discuss the leading possibilities as a cautionary benedictionBe sure to visit his site at Sibrel.com and subscribe to his Youtube Channel.

If you are so inclined, you may Donate to further Bart Sibrel’s research with a single one time donation, or a modest $5 per month recurring donation, to help Conspiracy Corner be entirely user supported.

 Your thoughtfulness is most appreciated.

Print Friendly

About The Author

Bart Sibrel is an award winning filmmaker, writer and investigative journalist who has been producing movies and television programs for years. During this time he has owned five production companies, been employed by two of the three major networks and produced films shown on ABC, NBC, CNN, TLC, USA, BET, as well as The Tonight Show with Jay Leno. To discuss his films, he has appeared and been interviewed on The Daily Show, Geraldo, NBC, CNN, FOX, Tech TV, Coast to Coast, and The Abrams Report. Articles featuring Mr. Sibrel’s films have been published in Time Magazine, The New York Times, The Washington Post, The L.A. Times, USA Today and many others. His top awards from the American Motion Picture Society include “Best Cinematography”, “Best Editing” and “Top Ten Director”. As the writer and director of the infamous “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon” which exposed the moon landing hoaxMr. Sibrel has collected over the years innumerous military, government, industrial and private sources for credible firsthand verification of very real conspiratorial crimes against humanity. He will use these contacts and experience in exposing the true and unbelievably horrific intentions of the hidden minority who have diabolical intentions for mankind in his monthly Sleuth Journal column "Conspiracy Corner". When such concepts are speculative and unverified, Mr. Sibrel will acknowledge this and openly discuss the leading possibilities as a cautionary benedictionBe sure to visit his site at Sibrel.com and subscribe to his Youtube Channel. If you are so inclined, you may Donate to further Bart Sibrel's research with a single one time donation, or a modest $5 per month recurring donation, to help Conspiracy Corner be entirely user supported. Your thoughtfulness is most appreciated.

Related posts

  • Bart Sibrel

    The following comment was left by “nicholas smith” on youtube. I found it so fascinating, that I am posting it below, as well as my reply to it.

    “nicholas smith” wrote:

    Mr sibrel. you do not understand physics. your invested in this hoax. I understand the journalistic malpractice. I’m sorry you don’t believe we went to the moon. I respect the passion. but it’s honestly a personal problem. we went to the moon and it’s insulting to these brave men and women to say they didn’t. I need more then some grainy footage to shake my belief. it’s way harder to hoax the moon landing then to actually go.

    My Reply:

    It is soooooooo much more difficult to go to the moon than to merely pretend to go. This is soooooooo obvious. It amazes me that you see it the other way. (Or do you really?) If you cannot comprehend this simple truth, then how can you possibly understand something as intricate as a CIA hoax?

    Just look at the recent film “Apollo 18”. Was it shot on location on the moon or in a film studio on Earth? In a film studio on Earth! Why? Because it it EASIER to FAKE it than to actually DO it! The EXACT OPPOSITE of what you said! If you are wrong on such a simple matter to this degree, then why should someone trust your “understanding” of physics? Physics prove that the moon landings did not take place, by the simple fact that, according to the rules of science, an outrageous first of a scientific claim, such as cold fusion, or landing on the moon in the 1960’s, must be INDEPENDENTLY verified by ANOTHER PARTY, by them REPEATING the outrageous claim. This has not happened, so according to the rules of science, the moon landings are a FALSE claim. Several Nobel laureates have had to give back their awards for evidence later coming to light that their data was falsified for personal gain. The same is true of the notorious liar, Richard Nixon, who was president at the time, and authorized this and numerous other CIA scandals, which he is well known for.

    If I said I just accomplished cold fusion, yet could not repeat the success for another 60 years, would it be within the laws of physics to believe that the first feat was genuine? Of course not!!!

    Likewise, no one can even “return” to the moon until, MAYBE, PERHAPS, 60 years after the outrageous first claim of five decades ago, so how could they have possibly gone to the moon on the very first attempt in the 1960’s with technology one tenth as sophisticated as we have today, when they cannot even go to the moon with half a century’s advancements today?!?!

    Are you really that hypnotized, or are you just trying to fool us?

    If you are sincere, which I find hard to believe, then all that you are an expert in, is living by your emotions, like a man overly infatuated with an adulterous woman who is cheating on him, yet his emotions will not allow himself to face the deplorable facts, because the Truth would break his heart, so he believes the lie instead.

    The article below spells out the obviousness of the moon landing fraud, by a former NASA employee’s earlier admission of the inability to reach the moon unless the launch was done from the north or south pole, which it was not.

    If you really are who you claim, and cannot see the blatant facts presented in the article below, then it is because the “glory” of the “moon missions” has become a god to you, and your pride has blinded you from seeing the Truth.

    It is curious to me that a person like yourself, who claims to be such a diehard fan of the falsified moon landings, is so quickly on this youtube channel, minutes after the posting of a video regarding a topic which you claim so offends you. If I and my opinions are so despicable to you, as you claim, then why are you here on this channel?

    If the moon landings are so obvious as you claim, then an intelligent person, like you claim to be, would not waste their precious time trying to convince someone that 1+1=2 if another believes it equals one million.

    Obviously, you are here for another reason.

    I love you anyway!

    Be Blessed!

    I hope you make it to heaven.

    Brother Bart

    http://www.thesleuthjournal.com/newly-discovered-document-proves-nasa-moon-landing-fraud/

    • Saurabh Mistry

      Well Mr,Sibrel, I have nothing more to add. The reply is so on point. Cheers!

  • Phred Blunt

    My Dear Brother Bart (and anybody else),

    Rockets (or ‘space shuttles’) are unable to get into space, at all, ever. They might lumber into the sky but once out of sight we don’t know where they go. Thus there are no satellites, probes, fancy telescopes, space stations or anything else. The whole NASA thing is a monumental hoax from beginning to end. Re-entry is impossible. All the fakery can be (and has been) done on this earth.

  • Bart Sibrel

    The following comment was left by “nicholas smith” on my Youtube channel. I found it so fascinating, that I am posting it below, as well as my reply to it.

    From “nicholas smith”:

    “Apollo 8 first orbited the moon with tons of footage and the earthrise famous photograph. they didn’t land on the moon but we’re in lunar orbit. so they passed the radiation. Mr sibrel does not mention that. so that there automatically shuts down the whole argument. People believe what they want to believe. it’s such a compliment that people are so awestruck by what we achieved that they can’t believe it.”

    My reply:

    Ah . . . I see the problem now . . .

    (From the overflow of the heart the mouth speaks.)

    You said, “People are so awestruck by what WE achieved”.

    Were you there? Did you work on the rocket? Were you even alive at the time? (I don’t think you were.) This is sooooooooo funny!

    You are such a hypocrite! You point the finger at others who see the truth, when in REALITY it is YOU who are believing what you want to believe despite the blatant facts. This is soooooooo obvious in your statement, “People are so awestruck by what WE achieved”, when you had nothing whatsoever to do with it. This is concrete proof that it is YOU who are being emotional and not logical, like those who sit on a couch saying, “WE won the Super Bowl !”, when they were not on the field, not in the stadium, and not a single member of their “team” is actually from their hometown namesake anyway. Then if someone points out to them that “their” team cheated to win, they are ready to punch you in the face, even though it is true.

    I do not spend my days monitoring pro-NASA websites and youtube channels to pounce on them within minutes of uploads like you do to argue your points. Why? Because the facts in my films and articles speak for themselves. If the “moon landings” allegedly accomplished on the very first attempt with antiquated 1960’s technology (even though they cannot be repeated toady with 50 years of technological advancements) were so obviously real as you claim, then the truth does not need your help. The fact that you are here exhaustively arguing to keep the “glory” of the missions alive, is clear evidence that the so-called “facts” of the event DO need your help, BECAUSE they are NOT sufficient to speak for themselves, otherwise you would not be here.

    A noted historian once said, “The likelihood of one individual being right increases in direct proportion to the intensity with which others are trying to prove him wrong.”

    By the way, in the newly discovered unedited footage of Apollo 11 pretending to be half way to the moon from earth orbit, as they are faking the photography, in the unedited outtakes, they say, “This is exactly the way TEN did it”, meaning Apollo 10, who also falsely claimed to have orbited the moon, faked the same photography the same way, just as Apollo 8 and 11 did, because they too never left Earth orbit. Remember, unmanned probes can pass through the radiation belts and take nice pictures of lunar orbit and send them back. This is, after all, how NASA got that large scale, completely photographically accurate, three dimensional moon mockup, with which the astronauts “practiced” the moon landings (and was later used as a false background to fake the photography).

    To say that proof of the moon landings is contained in additional “evidence” from the very criminals who perpetrated the fraud in the first place is laughable, all the while you think you are being so logical.

    I pray that God Himself opens your eyes to the Truth so that you will not live such a dangerous delusion, which could cost you your wellbeing now, and your eternity later.

    http://www.thesleuthjournal.com/newly-discovered-document-proves-nasa-moon-landing-fraud/

    http://www.thesleuthjournal.com/fate-update-real-purpose-orion-mission/

    http://www.thesleuthjournal.com/twice-time-needed-reach-moon-today-50-years-ago/

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xciCJfbTvE4

    http://www.thesleuthjournal.com/land-moon-1960s-technology/

  • fortHistruth

    There are many other sources of proof supporting this exposure of a massive tax-paid hoax and fraud. I encourage readers, and researchers to look for such, even for as many as are already in one’s ‘backyard’.
    Most recent is a post from this website sent out on March 11, of this year. The article by Greg White concerns the Fukushima meltdown disaster -i’m sure Jack Lemmon would be surprised-, and how the high-tech, modern specially made robots, sent into the reactors, to retrieve rods, were destroyed.
    Since these robots couldn’t ‘take the heat’, from radiation on earth, 45+ yrs. after the NASA ‘lunar-cy’, how on earth could they have done the ‘to the moon’ routine. They may have to our untrained eyes, gotten off the ground, but they didn’t actually show us the actually path of the rocket once it was ‘outta sight’.
    There is also the doubt in many people’s minds, that the ‘space cadets’ weren’t even actually on board the rocket we saw thrusted off the pad at Cape Kennedy -f/k/a, and n/k/a Cape Canaveral. This aside from actually being successful in sending anything through, let alone beyond the 2 thick VanAllen radiation belts surrounding the earth and it’s inner spheres.
    I am now ‘on the lookout’ for verifiable and supporting info, which proves on earth, that one cannot leave the planet in the way that the govt would have us be dumbed-down into believing.
    We should not put up with their billion dollar lies, and they deserve no less, to be fully exposed, and brought to disgrace for their deceitful perpetration forced upon us by a lying media and govt.

  • Rajeev Shagun

    Brother Bart,
    Thanks again for your passion and hard work to unveiling this biggest hoax of human History. I am very sure that in coming future soon it will be confessed or confirmed because unless we correct the previous mistakes we can’t go to deep space and return alive. If human is really willing to go to deep.space then has to develop the protection system against Van Allen radiation belts and without confessing that Apollo was just the low earth orbits machine and we ever had gone beyond low earth orbits ,its noway we can honestly develop the system. Like Kelly Smith and other young scientists who has no emotional attachment to Apollo, the chances are high that soon we get everything cleared otherwise we have to stay always in low earth orbits. Great jub Bart!