Tag Archives: Eugenics

Global Warming Is About Global Mass Genocide (VIDEO)

The Georgia Guidestones are symbols of the global depopulation agenda. It is written on their surface that the human population should not exceed 500 million people.

The Georgia Guidestones are symbols of the global depopulation agenda. It is written on their surface that the human population should not exceed 500 million people.

The environmentalist movement was created to impose the policies desired by the British Empire, typified by WWF founder, Prince Philip. His desire to kill off billions of people via global scares such as global warming are supported by lies, created to promote a fascist genocidal policy… in the name of environmentalism.”

Followers of this movement may be well meaning, though mislead. The creators of this movement are Nazis… literally! See it for yourself and research this topic further.

The video below by LaRouchePac, explains it in a nutshell.


Luis R. Miranda is an award-winning journalist and the founder and editor-in-chief at The Real Agenda. His career spans over 18 years and almost every form of news media. His articles include subjects such as environmentalism, Agenda 21, climate change, geopolitics, globalisation, health, vaccines, food safety, corporate control of governments, immigration and banking cartels, among others. Luis has worked as a news reporter, on-air personality for Live and Live-to-tape news programs. He has also worked as a script writer, producer and co-producer on broadcast news. Read more about Luis.

The Eugenicists Finally Got Sterilants Added To The Drinking Water

birth control pills water

By: Truthstream Media |

Compulsory abortion. Under-the-skin birth control implants. Government authorized reproduction. A Planetary Regime to regulate the population and ration food and resources. A sterilant added to water supplies or food staples. The expansion of mandatory family planning and government enforced population restrictions.

All of this and more is discussed frankly in the 1977 textbook, Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment, written jointly by John P. Holdren, Paul Ehrlich and his wife Anne Ehrlich (the follow up to the Erlichs’ 1970 text Population, Resources, Environment: Issues In Human Ecology, which essentially has a lot of the exact same passages…).

For years, overpopulation alarmists have dreamed of a day when the population would be forcibly controlled in a widespread manner.

Now it would seem they are passively getting their wish.

Is it a happy accident, or a clever second-hand scheme?

As Natural News recently reported, a new U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) study published in the journal Scientific Reports has shown that birth control hormones taken by women in this country are being flushed down the toilets and making their way into waterways and winding up in our drinking water. Fish exposed to these hormones are now struggling to reproduce, and are negatively impacted for three generations out the study has shown.

We’re talking about things like a 30% reduction in fertilization rates and offspring struggling just to survive. A 20% reduction by the third generation. These effects are not short term.

And if its doing that to fish, imagine what it is doing to the population who drinks, cooks, and bathes in tap water replete with the stuff on a daily basis.

No one has studied the bioaccumulative effect this situation has had on the human population here, and since population control seems to be a government national security effort, we aren’t holding our breath on one any time soon.

Considering that fertility clinics have popped up everywhere in the last decade to become a booming business, we can pretty much guess. It’s a $2 billion industry in the U.S. each year, and business is booming.

According to The Guttmacher Institute, a Planned Parenthood ally, more than 9.7 women in the U.S. take birth control pills on a monthly basis — over 16% of the female population aged 15-44. That’s a lot of hormones being dumped in municipal water supplies every day. Traditional filtering methods employed at most water treatment plants don’t remove pharmaceuticals including these hormones. Synthetic hormone 17a-ethinylestradiol, or EE2, is the common birth control pill additive that people are consuming in tap water supplies daily without even realizing it. Traditional drip water filters will not get this drug out, either.

It’s safe to say a large portion of the population — men, women and children alike — is essentially drinking a sterilant on a daily basis, and that’s before even getting to the potential widespread feminization of men. (On a side note, were you aware there was a plot during World War II to feminize Hitler by adding estrogen to his water?)

“Fertility control agents in water supply” was exactly what was listed in the horrifying leaked memo written to Bernard Berelson, president of the Rockefeller-founded Population Council, by Frederick S. Jaffe, vice president of Planned Parenthood – World Population, found in “Activities Relevant to the Study of Population Policy for the U.S.” dated 3/11/69 under the heading “Examples of Proposed Measures to Reduce U.S. Fertility, by Universality or Selectivity of Impact”. So were things like “encourage increased homosexuality” and “alter image of ideal family size” (overpopulation propaganda, anyone?) alongside forced abortions for out-of-wedlock pregnancy and “Compulsory sterilization of all who have two children except for a few who would be allowed three”.

Measures that would be impossible to do through government policy due to public outrage is happening on a population-wide scale as a de facto side effect of our drugged society.

While it may not technically be forced mass drugging, the leached chemicals are difficult if not impossible to avoid — particularly for average Americans, who have been told to drink 8 glasses of water per day. Kind of eerie, particularly when you consider how giddy it must make those who have quietly advocated these measures for decades.

Instead of being able to forcibly add sterilants in the water, people like the Rockellers through their foundation have spent millions developing birth control pills and pushing them on women across the country and around the world for decades now through family planning programs. The byproduct? Sterilants in the water.

(And a society with no future…)

They finally did it.

Original article: http://truthstreammedia.com/2015/07/14/the-eugenicists-finally-got-sterilants-added-to-the-drinking-water/

Panel Of “Experts” Proposes A Stronger United Nations

united nations

Madeleine Albright and Ibrahim Gambari are two of the people who say that the UN needs to be “renovated” and “modernized” in order to remain strong and relevant.

The United Nations is a globalist organization born out of the geopolitical debris left after World War II as well as as a result of the global elite’s desire to exercise complete control over the population.

Its predecesor, the League of Nations, was the start of what later became a network of influential globalist supranational organizations whose legitimacy is more than questionable given the poor results they’ve produced in favor of the people of the world.

These organizations include the UN itself, a body dominated by the winners of WW II who saw in the end of the war an opportunity to shape the future to their liking. Each of those members was charged with taking on an issue that the globalists understood as a challenge, while at the same time collaborating with each other on regional and global matters. One of those issues, perhaps the most important, is Eugenics.

Globalists intend to reduce and keep the world’s population at less than 1 billion people. Recently, a representative of the Vatican and the governor of Caliornia expressed their desire to depopulate the planet and implement a global court that would enforce an “Earth Constitution” and that would be part of their Global Government.

Despite being seen as an organization that represents the interests of the masses, the UN is actually a politically castrated body, whose decisions are for the most part non-binding. Only that which is decided by the members of the Security Council, formed by the strongest political and military forces of the planet, is adopted as official UN policy, although it does not always ends up being respected or followed.

The insignificance of the UN is not a coincidence. The UN was never intended to be a global body where all of its members had equal representation, or where countries could deal with their national or regional affairs. Up until today, the UN is a sterile forum where national representatives go to give speeches that are almost immediately forgotten.

Do not let the UN’s sterility and political castration deceive you, though. Right now, the UN is a shell whose interior is just about to be stuffed with the power and force that its creators always intended it to have.

Recently, the United Nations served as a forum for globalist politicians and their representatives to propose the massive confiscation of firearms in the United States, a plan that has been in the works for decades. If approved and adopted, this proposal would forcibly take the American people’s constitutional right to own guns.

More detailed versions of plans such as the UN Arms Treaty, intend to make the United Nations the sole military power on the planet, which would require countries to surrender their weapons, or to transfer their use to the hands of a group of unelected politicians at the UN.

A similar proposal was presented in political circles regarding internet management. People at the UN and national representatives at G7 countries are working side by side to give the UN complete control over internet communications in the same way that others proposed surrendering military equipment.

A third and perhaps the most important attempt by globalists to complete their plan of total control over humanity is the environmental agenda of the United Nations. Two documents referring to the imposition of limits to development and individual liberty have been issued by the UN in the last few decades. The 1992 United Nations Biodiversity Assessment which was later complemented with the Agenda 21 plan are clear examples of how those behind the UN seek complete control over people and resources.

Now, a panel of experts that includes former United States Secretary of State, Madeleine Albright and Ibrahim Gambari, former Nigerian Minister of Foreign Affairs, is advancing a proposal to finally “renovate” and “modernize” the United Nations, which in practice would mean giving the UN total power over communications, environmental issues and military affairs, among others.

As the United Nations’ 70th anniversary approaches, a so-called independent committee of 14 experts has prepared a report with what they call ambitious recommendations to “reform the world’s most famous intergovernmental body”.

Gathered around the Commission on Global Security, Justice and Governance sponsored by the Hague Institute for Global Justice and the American study center Stimson the proposed change covers three main areas: climate, cybercrime and international conflicts, the very same issues where the UN has attempted to force itself on sovereign nations.

“The UN is not prepared to face the current threats, which are changing. If you do not want to risk prolonging global crises, it should be renewed,” says the study.

The report isued by this group was titled “Facing the crisis of global governance”, and it was presented Tuesday at the Peace Palace, the home of the International Court of the UN.

Directed by Madeleine Albright and Ibrahim Gambari, the organization warns about the need to make decisions that go “beyond national borders and that aim to reach the world of business and civil society, as well as other institutions of global governance, to better address the challenges of state conflicts, climate change and the hyper-connected economy. “

The proposed changes involve, among other things, modernizing international peacekeeping and mediation.

According to the authors, it is necessary to create a new generation of mediators, with a higher proportion of women, to prevent conflicts and maintain peace.

The report makes use of a popular technique of mass manipulation, which makes it appear as if the proposed changes are politically correct, by impling that including more women and more members of minority groups is the key to making the plan succeed.

“Also, it is vital to have enough civil, military and police personnel to meet the tasks of peace missions themselves, involve women to back reconstruction process, and coordinate all UN agencies to prevent atrocities is considered indispensable.”

On the fake issue of climate doomsday, the report argues that “The climate is another pillar of the suggested reforms, and collaboration with the private sector, creating green technology licensing and review of experiments conducted on “atmospheric changes” is requested.”

The so-called experts use the same type of language as the UN’s IPCC, the political body in charge of making up and implementing scientific polic. “You also need to set a target for climate adaptation. Something like the barrier of two degrees Celsius warming, recommended to contain the greenhouse effect.”

The study presented by former political figures also took a shot at economics and financial issues. “Given the inevitable consequences of the vagaries of the world economy, the study aims to “create an additional G20 (G20 +) for true cooperation avoid financial crisis.”

The globalists also want to centralize control of the internet by officializing the existence of internet police. “On cybercrime, another widespread phenomenon, it appears to be necessary the creation of a global network of centers to combat it, with the help of Interpol.

A report of this nature would not be complete without making reference to the Security Council in its current composition.

As we said before, this body is composed y five permanent members -Russia, Britain, China, France and the United States- with veto power who make their own decisions on all sorts of global affairs. According to the report, it is preferable to “provide opportunities to other countries, regional organizations and NGOs, as well as local authorities, to contribute to the forging and maintenance of peace.” This same type of speech has presented at the beginning of negoatiations on climate, but in truth participants were and still are only allowed to talk about a pre-established agenda set by the UN.

“At the same time, we should strengthen the Council’s legitimacy and restrict the right of veto,” concludes the report.

The proposals contained in the study will be presented next September at the UN during the 70th anniversary commemorative summit in New York.


Luis R. Miranda is an award-winning journalist and the founder and editor-in-chief at The Real Agenda. His career spans over 18 years and almost every form of news media. His articles include subjects such as environmentalism, Agenda 21, climate change, geopolitics, globalisation, health, vaccines, food safety, corporate control of governments, immigration and banking cartels, among others. Luis has worked as a news reporter, on-air personality for Live and Live-to-tape news programs. He has also worked as a script writer, producer and co-producer on broadcast news. Read more about Luis.

Millions Of Girls Given Vaccines Secretly Spiked With Sterilization Drugs

vaccine
By: Kimberly Paxton | The Daily Sheeple –

Although some might call it a conspiracy theory, the World Health Organization, UNICEF, and the United Nations have been accused for decades of trying to secretly reduce the world’s population by hiding contraceptives in vaccines that are purported to be for other purposes.

In 1992, during a meeting at the UN headquarters in Geneva, scientists and “women’s health advocates” discussed the use of “fertility regulating vaccines, particularly the anti-Human Chorionic Gonadotropin vaccine. (source)

If you had any doubt in your mind that this was true, doctors at a Catholic hospital in Kenya are out to prove that millions of girls have been tricked into receiving an injection that will render them sterile for years.

Independent laboratory testing has confirmed that a tetanus vaccine given to over 2.3 million young women in Kenya contained the HCG antigen.

HCG was developed by the WHO as a long-term contraceptive. It causes the body to attack a fetus through an antibody response, and can cause spontaneous abortions for 3 years after the woman is injected with the drug.

Dr. Muhame Ngare of Mercy Medical Centre in Nairobi said:

We sent six samples from around Kenya to laboratories in South Africa. They tested positive for the HCG antigen. They were all laced with HCG.

This proved right our worst fears; that this WHO campaign is not about eradicating neonatal tetanus but a well-coordinated forceful population control mass sterilization exercise using a proven fertility regulating vaccine. This evidence was presented to the Ministry of Health before the third round of immunization but was ignored. (source)

Perhaps unsurprisingly, the Kenyan health ministry has denied that this is the case, offering up claims that many women who received the vaccine became pregnant afterwards. But Dr. Ngare (who, incidentally, is pro-vaccine, just not pro-secret-sterilizing-additive) stands firm in his assertion and provides a convincing argument.

Either we are lying or the government is lying. But ask yourself, ‘What reason do the Catholic doctors have for lying?’ The Catholic Church has been here in Kenya providing health care and vaccinating for 100 years for longer than Kenya has existed as a country.

Usually we give a series three shots over two to three years, we give it anyone who comes into the clinic with an open wound, men, women or children. If this is intended to inoculate children in the womb, why give it to girls starting at 15 years? You cannot get married till you are 18.” The usual way to vaccinate children is to wait till they are six weeks old.

The only time tetanus vaccine has been given in five doses is when it is used as a carrier in fertility regulating vaccines laced with the pregnancy hormone, Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG) developed by WHO in 1992. (source)

Hmmm…so why would this vaccine only be given to young, fertile women? Since tetanus is a type of bacterial infection that occurs after a person is wounded with a rusty or dirty object, wouldn’t it stand to reason that this vaccine, if given in the interest of protecting patients from the infection, be given to both genders, and people of a variety of ages? Are girls at the height of fertility somehow more likely to injure themselves in such a way?

The Kenyan government has a glib answer. Apparently, they wish to proactively inoculate babies in the womb against tetanus, which causes 550 deaths per year.

Catholic priests across Kenya are advising their congregants to refuse these vaccinations.


Kimberly Paxton, a staff writer for The Daily Sheeple, is based out of upstate New York. You can follow Kimberly on Facebook and Twitter.

How Much Evidence Do We Need To Take Action?

eugenics collage

The news pouring in daily about how we’re being scammed, poisoned and domineered by big food, big pharma, big oil, big corporations and big brother is almost overwhelming.

It’s past time to draw some conclusions from all of the obvious evidence.

This is where the rubber meets the road. There comes a time we need to crystallize all that’s being plainly revealed into a very clear picture that brings personal action and a conscious response. The global engineers are enacting a full spectrum attack on humanity, to not just subdue, control and transform the world’s populations, but to reduce it by slowly maiming and killing it off.

The common awareness of these programs extends to such arenas as weather and electromagnetic warfare, radiation contamination and a full on global fracking agenda, full spectrum geopolitical hegemony, invasive medical and pharmaceutical fascism, and the tightening economic vice grip on people’s supply lines and their very survival.

Everything we read daily points in the same direction.

The question before us is, what will we do in the face of such an onslaught? Are we first of all willing to draw some conscious conclusions? Or are we afraid due to the implications of what our personal involvement might entail? And all while our race is clearly being adulterated and exterminated?

Serious personal questions indeed. Courage is the absence of letting fear rule our lives. Doing the conscious and responsible thing is the duty of every living creature, not just “activists”, another term used pejoratively to keep people from doing the obvious.

 bill-melinda-gates-foundation-eugenics-planned-parenthood-nwo-vaccines-population-control

Eugenics – The Openly Declared Usurping Elitist Agenda

Elitism runs on fundamental tenets. Thinking they are superior and knowing what’s best for the world, they have funded and operated think tanks, foundations, institutions, universities and secret organizations for centuries in one form or another to formulate and hone their plans.

The scale is massive with these internationalists and we are the subjects of their experimental implementations. That their aim is to modify as well as reduce our numbers is a repeatedly documented goal of these psychopaths.

All for control and arrogantly assumed domination of those they consider inferior.

After all is said and done, they’re not sure of anything, despite their hubris. We are a race with qualities they cannot fathom due to their abject lack of empathy and true conscious awareness, despite their metastasized left-brained so-called intelligence and other intimidating dark machinations and engineered influences.

Recent decades have seen a massive proliferation of such elite planning organizations, many operating openly with benign names like the Rand Corporation, the Stanford Institute, the Rockefeller Foundation, the Carnegie Institute, the Red Cross, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Institute for the Advancement of the Sciences, the Ford Foundation, the Sierra Club, the Jesuit Society of Jesus and many many more.

Most hypno-zombies don’t think anything of such organizations. After all, like the “Patriot Act”, they must be for out collective good.

More profoundly, media manipulation through language sorcery and meme repetition has been extremely successful. Most would never even stop to question anything sounding like an “authority” on some issue, hence the worship of men in white coats with strings of degrees after their names, trusting “talking heads”, institutions like these and anything sounding credible.

The-further-a-society-drifts-from-Truth-the-more-it-will-have-those-that-speak-it

To the News

Which brings me to the news. Almost hourly we’re reading of new exposés regarding critical health issues, from the disastrous effects of vaccines and pharmaceutical drugs to the cover up of what is actually in our adulterated and genetically modified food which they themselves won’t touch, as well as our drinking water and the very air we breathe.

Not new, but bubbling up more and more in the mass consciousness.

The world militarization and mass surveillance agenda is another major factor happening concurrently as an obvious manifestation of this globalist agenda. Media complicity is clear and their influence is waning rapidly as grass roots community actions proliferate.

Just the fact that the realistic, awake and aware perspective of seeing these realities for what they are has been portrayed as “conspiratorial” puts the control issue way over the top, not just in Orwellian incredulity, but exactly where they want it in the mass mind. Safely ensconced in frozen compartmentalized suspended animation.

In plain reality of course it’s a very real conspiracy, and they’re clearly executing a stated agenda, one we’re fully aware of. Naturally they have to decry anything that opposes it.

What an obvious sham. But again, who’s looking?

We are!

TheWall

What We’re Up Against

It’s a disinformation machine, spouting out whatever toxic spew it deems necessary at any given time. Keeping people in the dark is their number one job. Once you catch on to that you’re on your way to mental and spiritual freedom, but it takes some doing, and takes guts to openly see past the green screen projection we’re being fed.

As someone wisely said, “The truth will set you free, but first it will piss you off.”

Very true words indeed. Get past that stage and start to activate. Every one of us counts.

rainbow

Conclusion

If we don’t respond consciously to this invasion on our kind we’re not worth our salt. Doing what we can restores confidence and an innate sense of who we are, and spurs many others on to do the same.

Pass it on. And on and on. Passionate communication is the key to empowerment at this point. Never downplay or delay that.

All of this is just for starters. The rest is up to you, and me. There are massively powerful spiritual weapons of mass construction at our disposal such as localized community activism – use them, and discover new avenues continually. We’re swimming in an ocean of possibility waiting to be tapped into and manifested.

There is nothing more empowering than that as I see it.

Hope you do too. It’s a wonderful opportunity for taking the initiative and making a massive difference.

See you there!

Much love, Zen


By Zen Gardner at ZenGardner.com.

 

USAID Funding Of Sterilization Camps In India

india sterilization camps

By: Pop.org

How American tax dollars have been the driving force behind India’s brutal population control programs.

Women’s wombs are inflated with bicycle pumps. Some are paid as little as 600 rupees – about $10 –  to be sterilized. Some see – and feel – doctors pull shreds of their organs from their abdomens during procedures. Doctors reuse gloves and needles for dozens of surgeries.  Antibiotics or painkillers, if used, may be tainted with rat poison.

These are just a few of the details about India’s “family planning” programs that have emerged in the wake of the latest population control tragedy: the deaths in November of 14 women at a government sponsored sterilization “camp” in central India where health officials’ reports  say 83 women underwent surgical sterilization at the hands of one doctor in just a few hours.[1]

PRI has numerous documents which demonstrate unambiguously that America’s foreign aid agency USAID has underwritten such camps in India for decades. They also establish that the agency  – in concert with a host of American charity groups, India’s biggest bank and private funders like Bill and Melinda Gates – has been the primary architect and a major overseer of the country’s state-run population control.

BUSINESS AS USUAL

Two days after the news broke about the deaths of the women in Chhattisgarh at an abandoned rural hospital  – while Indian health officials and human rights activists were denouncing the camp and the surgeon who conducted it was hiding from the swelling numbers of protesters in the district of Bilaspur– it was business as usual in the rural town of Gaurella just about 40 km north where workers were holding their twice-weekly sterilization day at the local health center.

The death toll was not as high – only one woman died but many more were hospitalized. It probably wouldn’t have been reported at all except for the events earlier in the week. The Delhi based Human Rights Law Network had sent an activist and two lawyers to speak with the deceased women’s relatives and health workers in Chhattisgarh. The stories recounted in their report released in December illustrate one of the darkest and cruellest population control regimes on earth.[2]

ONE FAMILY’S NIGHTMARE

Chaiti Bai was 22 years old and the mother of a six year old and 7 month old baby. She had never used contraception between her pregnancies but she had been feeling unwell in October 2014 and was jaundiced. So when the mitanin  – or community health worker –  came to her door and told her she could receive treatment at the Community Health Center in Gaurella, she agreed. The health center has a target of sterilizing 800 women each year, but the worker never mentioned sterilization or family planning to Chaiti.

Upon arrival at the center, Chaiti’s husband Budh Singh was given a blank paper to sign. Unlike many in the center, he and his wife could read and write, but there was not text on the paper. He signed for his wife’s medical treatment anyway. No one mentioned family planning or sterilization and Budh was ushered outside to wait.

A few hours later, when he was allowed into the recovery room, Budh found Chaiti among many women lying on the filthy floor, barely conscious. A health worker gave him some medicines for his wife, but no instructions and no paperwork.

The following evening Chaiti began vomiting. The health center sent her by ambulance to the district hospital three hours away the following day, but she died en route. Bud Singh received a compensation cheque from the government for 200,000 rupees –about $3200.

WHO IS TO BLAME?

Health officials reported that some of the medicines used in Chhattisgarh contained a banned chemical used to poison rats. Police arrested the head of the company that made the drugs in Bilaspur and shut his factories. But other reports cited rusty surgical equipment causing infection as the cause of deaths. Many blamed the butchery of the greedy surgeon who, working for 100 rupees per operation according to one news report, was accused of trying to cram as many as he could in an afternoon’s work.[3]

Surgeon R.K Gupta, who conducted the procedures did not understand the outrage, however. He told reporters that he had done more than 50,000 such surgeries and blamed the government for the number of women he sterilized on the day. “It is up to the administration to decide how many women would be kept for operation,” he said.[4]

Indeed, human rights activists pointed to the government for failing to put a stop to the camps which not only violate the most basic national health and safety standards, but also clearly and egregiously breech national and international guidelines respecting human rights.

Human rights activists have repeatedly documented that camps like those in Chhattisgarh are pervasive and routine throughout India. They’ve detailed how women are persuaded with cash incentives  – or the chance to win a refrigerator or a car  – and how they  are coerced  – into sterilizations. And they have described cases in harrowing detail: young childless women consenting to procedures by thumbprint unaware that it would leave them infertile; dozens of women being sterilized on school desks by doctors operating by flashlight; women maimed in the quest to meet government sterilization quotas.[5]  Just last year, there was outrage after the national television station aired footage  of women lined up and bleeding on the ground at a camp where 103 lower caste women had been sterilized in under five hours in another state.[6]

Yet none of the Supreme Court of India rulings, international policies and declarations, ever seem to make a difference in India which has been a playground for population controllers for decades.

USAID DENIAL

USAID has denied having anything to do with India’s odious sterilization camps in the past but its recent response to PRI carefully distanced itself only from “involuntary sterilization” in India.

“We are aware of the tragic deaths which have occurred in India related to female laproscopic sterilization surgeries,” a USAID spokesman said in a written statement to PRI.  “We offer our deepest condolences and sympathies to the affected families. USAID does not support involuntary sterilization contraceptive services in India or in any other country in which we implement programs. U.S. law prohibits the use of foreign assistance funds to pay for the performance of involuntary sterilization as a method of family planning or to coerce or provide any financial incentive to any person to undergo sterilizations. Additional legal and policy requirements that apply to USAID-supported sterilization activities also help ensure the principles of voluntarism and informed choice.”

But documents reveal that USAID has for more than two decades been at the helm of India’s family planning programs, not just funding the massive directive that includes tens of thousands of camps, but overseeing and orchestrating the entire program, even encouraging cash incentives for sterilization and IUD insertion.

A 2012 report from the Washington, D.C based global health consulting firm, Futures Group International, for example, outlines USAID’s 20 year involvement in one family planning program, funding more than 60,000 “integrative reproductive and child health camps” which provided more than 810,000 sterilizations in a single state in India, in its first 10 years of operation —  even providing transportation to the camps, but only for the sterilization “acceptors.” [7]

The document describes a USAID designed program called the Innovations in Family Planning Services (IFPS). Determined to constrict India’s population growth, USAID signed the IFPS bilateral agreement on September 30, 1992. It was launched as a 10-year program, with $325 million from USAID to be matched by $400 million from India’s government. It targeted India’s most populous state, Uttar Pradesh, because of its high fertility rate (5.2 children per woman)  and its low contraceptive use (21% using a Western technology to prevent births).

“The primary goal of the IFPS Project was to assist the state of Uttar Pradesh in reducing the rate of population growth to a level consistent with its social and economic objectives,” explains an affiliated program’s website. “In this long term goal, it is implied that there is a need to lower the level of fertility significantly.”[8]

Eventually, buoyed by its success, the IFPS extended into two more phases of operation between 2005 and 2012 in the states of Uttarakhand and Jharkhand. As well as providing “reproductive health services,” USAID interventions included training, technical support, social marketing, “behaviour change communication,” and the cultivation of “private public partnerships” (PPPs) in the global family planning industry.

As a first step towards achieving its long term goal in Uttar Pradesh, USAID and the IFPS created a special “autonomous parastatal” agency called the State Innovations in Family Planning Services Agency (SIFPSA) to “provide flexibility and avoid bureaucratic delays.” In other words, they made an unaccountable agency to operate away from public view and outside the democratic process. It was directed by members of the governments of India and Uttar Pradesh as well as representatives from USAID and a number of private sector experts, all of whom, according to one report to USAID, it could afford to pay higher salaries than the governments could offer and had more control over finances.[9]

The Futures Group report documents how SIFPSA and the IFPS have used every “innovation” they could think of to achieve USAID’s population reduction goal:  attracting and training “providers,” “integration” of “family planning” with immunization and other services; the recruitment and training of  armies of community workers to act as “motivators” to persuade Indian women to accept Western pharmaceuticals and surgical interventions; incentive schemes for “acceptors,”  massive advertising campaigns on radio, TV, wall paintings and even puppet shows to “change behaviour;”  sex education campaigns for teenagers; and campaigns to lure women to give birth in cleaner, safer delivery rooms – where they can also be contracepted. Even the local dairy co-operatives are utilized as a platform for propagandizing Western ideas about small families and promoting condoms, pills, IUDs and, of course, sterilization.[10]

While some of IFPS’s interventions, such as improving hygiene in delivery rooms or training gynecologists, have arguably helped Indian women, the campaigns for women’s “reproductive rights” and “children’s health,”  it is clear from the USAID and affiliates documents that all of the initiatives are ultimately aimed at achieving USAID’s paramount goal of reducing the number of children born in India.

“Foreign donors have been funding sterilization in India almost since the inception of India’s Family Planning Program,” Kerry McBroom, an American human rights lawyer with HRLN in Delhi told PRI. “Donor organizations need to be accountable for rights violations perpetrated with their funding. Activists have made reports of unsafe and unethical sterilization for decades – it’s impossible that donors are totally oblivious to the violations.”

Given that 85% of all family planning money goes to female sterilization, McBroom added, “wherever money is being spent for ‘maternal health’ or ‘reproductive health’ money is going for camps as they comprise a significant portion of both these projects.”

Take, for example, how USAID paid for transport for women attending “reproductive and child health camps,” (RCH camps) but only if they agreed to be sterilization. One USAID/India Strategic Objective Close Out Report published by the Organisation for Economic C-operation and   Development (OECD) describes a $168.3 million plan for “Reducing Fertility and Improving Reproductive Health in Northern India.”[11]

“RCH camps, which are popular as Parivar Swasthya Sewa Divas (Family Health Days)… provide an opportunity to integrate the efforts of providers and increase access to reproductive health services,” says the report. “Each camp included a gynecological check-up, child examination and immunization, family planning counselling and services and provision for transportation to clients who utilized sterilization services.”

Each camp was scheduled in advance and publicized. In rural areas, attractive jingles on audio cassettes were played, said the report on the project overseen by the Department of Finance in India, the SIFPSA and ICICI, India’s largest bank.

“SIFPSA has funded 47,889 camps over a six-year period from 1998,” says the report. “On an average, 100 clients attended each camp and more than half of these accessed integrated MCH services.”

It adds: “Since most of these camps were in remote rural areas, the availability of a team of surgeons, anesthetist and female gynecologist were ensured from the district level.  Enhanced budget for maintenance and fuel for vehicles was provided so that an adequate number of vehicles could be deployed to transport doctors to RCH camp sites and sterilization clients to their homes.”

Indicators used to measure the success of the USAID funded program included the “contraceptive prevalence rate” and the “total fertility rate” in Uttar Pradesh. Other indicators of progress were the percentage of babies born to trained providers and the percentage of women who received two tetanus toxoid (TT) vaccine injections during pregnancy – a questionable service considering that tetanus vaccines were recently surrounded with accusations of being tainted with contraceptive antibodies in Kenya, and all the more suspect in a campaign dedicated to reducing fertility.[12]

“Attendance at the RCH camps grew over time,” explains the Futures Group report. “By 2003, each camp on an average served 100 clients and more than half of the sterilization operations in the IFPS districts were performed at the RCH camps. Through March 2006, IFPS had supported 60,148 RCH camps, providing 525,000 antenatal check-ups, sterilization services to 810,000 men and women…” along, of course with a host of other family planning and immunization services.

ALL-AMERICAN FIELD SUPPORT

“Field support” groups listed in various documents include Johns Hopkins University, its affiliated non-profit “health organization”  Jhpiego, the New York City-based Association for Voluntary Surgical Contraception (AVSC) which was founded as the Sterilization League of New Jersey  in 1937 to “provide for the improvement of the human stock by the selective sterilization of the mentally defective and of those afflicted with inherited or inheritable physical disease.” It is currently known as Engender Health.[13]

Other groups financed by USAID to carry out the population control objective in India are the Washington, DC based Centre for Development and Population Activities (CEDPA), which trains health workers and “motivators” on the ground and produces family planning literature, CARE International, Population Technical Assistance Project[14], New York City based Population Council, the Chapel Hill, NC based medical training and technological support group Intrahealth International, and the Washington, D.C based Population Reference Bureau.

These group’s websites attest that they are still busy in family planning  in India and many acknowledge USAID funding . CEDPA’s most recent report lists $5.8 million in grants from the US government in 2010 for example, as well dozens of other private and corporate funders including the Ford Foundation, the Conrad N. Hilton Foundation, the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation and the Exxon Mobil Foundation.[15]

Stay tuned for Part II

[1]Indian doctors ‘use bicycle pump’ to inflate women’s abdomens during sterilisation surgery.” The Independent, Tuesday 02 December, 2014. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/indian-doctors-use-bicycle-pump-to-inflate-womens-abdomens-during-sterilisation-surgery-9897277.html

[2]Fact-Finding Report on Sterilization, Access to Contraceptive Information and Services, and Women’s Health in Bilaspur District, Chhattisgarh 14-18 November 2014,” Human Rights Law Network.

[3]India probe uncovers shared needles, poor hygiene after sterilisation deaths,” Mail online, 02 December, 2014. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/afp/article-2857219/Probe-finds-shared-needles-India-sterilisation-deaths.html

[4]India sterilisations were ‘my moral responsibility’, says doctor,” The Guardian, Thursday 13 November, 2014. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/nov/13/india-sterilisations-doctor-moral-responsibility-rkgupta

[5]U.S.-U.K. Foreign Aid Tied to India’s Forced Sterilization CampaignNational Catholic Register,  09 May, 2012.
http://www.ncregister.com/daily-news/u.s.-u.k.-foreign-aid-tied-to-indias-forced-sterilization-campaign/#ixzz3OKSecNKD

[6]103 women sterilised in a day at West Bengal hospital; probe ordered,” NDTV, 06 February, 2013. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5fmnGeK2cBM

[7]20 Years of the Innovations in Family Planning Services Project in Uttar Pradesh, India Experiences, Lessons Learned and Achievements The Power of Innovations and Partnership,” Futures Group International for USAID, April,  2012. http://futuresgroup.com/files/publications/20_Years_of_IFPS_in_Uttar_Pradesh.pdf

[8]State Innovations in Family Planning Services Project Agency website. http://www.sifpsa.org/ifps_project/objectives.htm

[9]EVALUATION: USAID/India Innovations in Family Planning Services Project Final Evaluation Report, May 2013. http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PA00JQ4B.pdf

[10]Opsit.

[11]USAID/INDIA STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE CLOSE OUT REPORT, http://www.oecd.org/derec/unitedstates/36133186.pdf

[12]The tense standoff between Catholic14 November, 2014.  bishops and the Kenyan government over tetanus vaccines, The Washington Post, http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/worldviews/wp/2014/11/14/the-tense-standoff-between-catholic-bishops-and-the-kenyan-government-over-tetanus-vaccines/

[13]Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EngenderHealth

[14]This Population Technical Assistance Project, also known as POPTECH, is not to be confused with PopTech, a global innovation group based in Camden, Maine. We apologize for our previous reference to PopTech, which was inadvertent. PopTech in Maine has never received USAID funding nor is involved in sterilization campaigns in India.

[15]2010 Annual Report, The Centre for Development and Population Activities. http://www.cedpa.org/files/2533_file_2010_Annual_Report_sm1.pdf

 

Pope Pushing Depopulation Agenda Of The Georgia Guidestones? (VIDEO)

georgia-guidestones

With the Vatican increasingly endorsing new “how to live” rules for their followers and society, they have clearly become more political than they’ve been in a long time. Pay attention.

In the video below, YouTube reporter RedsilverJ explains how the Pope appears to be pushing the agenda that’s etched into the mysterious Georgia Guidestones.

He points to the church’s recent support for climate change action and for telling Catholics to be “responsible parents” to control the population. These complimentary stances based on “science” seem to directly coincide with commandments on the Georgia Guidestones.

RedsilverJ did not mention the Pope’s recent “there are limits to free speech” comments, but they could also be attributed to an agenda to limit human freedom.


Redsilverj

h/t: Activist Post

Rep. Massie Exposes Obamacare Architect Gruber As Economic Eugenicist In Hearing (VIDEO)

jonathan-gruber

Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky laid into Obamacare architect Jonathan Gruber at today’s OGR Hearing in Congress, exposing him fully as an economic eugenicist.

Massie referred to Gruber’s economic paper on how giving free abortions to the poor would reduce the population burden for the better people, and how he endorses rationing end-of-life care for the poor for the same reason.

He even got Gruber to agree that he was “condescending” to the American people, that he lied to the public for their own good like they were children. Incredible exchange.

Is The UN Using Vaccines To Secretly Sterilize Women All Over The Globe?

Vaccines-Public-Domain

In some areas of the world, purposely cutting off someone’s family line is considered to be one of the most wicked things that you can possibly do.  But that appears to be precisely what the United Nations is doing.  Two UN organizations, the WHO and UNICEF, have just been caught red-handed administering “tetanus vaccines” laced with sterilizing agents to girls and women in Kenya.  And as you will see below, this is not the first time that this has happened.  Apparently there is a well-coordinated international program to use vaccines to secretly sterilize women in poor countries all over the planet.  The United States needs to immediately demand a full investigation of the UN vaccine program, but I wouldn’t count on that ever happening under the Obama administration.

There have always been anecdotal stories of women all over the globe being unable to have children after receiving UN vaccines.  But now we have scientific proof.  Lab tests that were recently conducted found an antigen that causes miscarriages in the vaccines that were being given to girls and women in Kenya.  A story that was posted on Life Site News about this caused shockwaves all over the Internet.  The following is an excerpt from that report…

Kenya’s Catholic bishops are charging two United Nations organizations with sterilizing millions of girls and women under cover of an anti-tetanus inoculation program sponsored by the Kenyan government.

According to a statement released Tuesday by the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, the organization has found an antigen that causes miscarriages in a vaccine being administered to 2.3 million girls and women by the World Health Organization and UNICEF. Priests throughout Kenya reportedly are advising their congregations to refuse the vaccine.

“We sent six samples from around Kenya to laboratories in South Africa. They tested positive for the HCG antigen,” Dr. Muhame Ngare of the Mercy Medical Centre in Nairobi told LifeSiteNews. “They were all laced with HCG.”

So exactly what is HCG?

The following is how Natural News described what it does…

HCG is a chemical developed by the World Health Organization for sterilization purposes. When injected into the body of a young woman, it causes a pregnancy to be destroyed by the body’s own antibody response to the HCG, resulting in a spontaneous abortion. Its effectiveness lasts for years, causing abortions in women up to three years after the injections.

This is an absolutely horrifying scandal, but the mainstream media is totally ignoring it.

Perhaps that is because they agree with what the United Nations is trying to do.

And should we actually be surprised at what the UN is doing?  After all, the UN has publicly declared in writing that it intends to reduce population growth in Kenya

The United Nations and its oftentimes barbaric population-control apparatus are under fire again after releasing a deeply controversial report claiming that the African population of Kenya is too large and growing too quickly. To deal with the supposed “challenge,” as the UN and its “partners” in the national government put it, international bureaucrats are demanding stepped up efforts to brainwash Kenyan women into wanting fewer children. Also on the agenda: more taxpayer-funded “family-planning” and “reproductive-health” schemes to reduce the number of Africans to levels considered “desirable” by the UN.

Critics promptly lambasted the plot as undisguised eugenics, with some experts calling it a true example of the “war on women.” Among other concerns, analysts outraged by the report noted that the UN Population Fund (UNFPA) and the establishment’s fiendish efforts to slash human populations — especially those considered “undesirable” by self-appointed guardians of the gene pool — have a long and sordid history going back decades. Today, the agenda marches on, as illustrated in the latest UN report calling for drastically reduced numbers of Kenyans.

When very evil people tell you that they intend to do something, you should take them very seriously.

And without a doubt, the UN is evil.  To use vaccines to secretly sterilize women against their will is almost too wicked to describe with words.

But the UN will keep doing this until we demand that they stop.  Back in the 1990s, similar sterilization campaigns using tetanus vaccines were being conducted in Nicaragua, Mexico and the Philippines.  The following comes from thinktwice.com

Here are the known facts concerning the tetanus vaccination campaigns in Mexico and the Philippines:

* Only women are vaccinated, and only the women between the ages of 15 and 45. (In Nicaragua the age range was 12-49.) But aren’t men at least as likely as young women to come into contact with tetanus? And what of the children? Why are they excluded?

* Human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) hormone has been found in the vaccines. It does not belong there — in the parlance of the O.J. Simpson murder trial, the vaccine has been “contaminated.”

* The vaccination protocols call for multiple injections — three within three months and a total of five altogether. But, since tetanus vaccinations provide protection for ten years or more, why are multiple inoculations called for?(3)

* WHO has been actively involved for more than 20 years in the development of an anti-fertility vaccine utilizing hCG tied to tetanus toxoid as a carrier — the exact same coupling as has been found in the Mexican-Philippine-Nicaragua vaccines.(4)

And these are just the incidents that we know about.

I think that it would be safe to say that wherever the UN is vaccinating people for tetanus all over the world there are probably sterilizing agents in those vaccines.

Meanwhile, the UN continues to pour money into other global sterilization methods.

For example, the UN has dedicated massive amounts of resources to supporting the “one-child policy” in China.

And in India, UN money is often used to provide financial incentives to women to volunteer for sterilization.

At this point, approximately 37 percent of all married women in the nation of India have been sterilized.  That is an absolutely astounding number.  In fact, it is so astounding that I could hardly believe it when I first saw it.

But it is actually true.

And these procedures are often not conducted safely.  In fact, one recent mass sterilization campaign resulted in the deaths of ten women

Ten women have died in India and dozens more are in hospital, many in a critical condition after a state-run mass sterilisation, a local official said Tuesday.

Many of the more than 80 women who underwent sterilisation at the free government-run camp in the central state of Chhattisgarh on Saturday fell ill shortly afterwards, the official told AFP.

Of course the United States is not exactly innocent in all of this.  These UN organizations are absolutely showered with money by the Obama administration, and the U.S. government even has an “Office of Population Affairs” that is used to promote population control all across the planet.

Those involved in these efforts actually believe that they are doing the right thing.  They are convinced that “climate change” is the number one problem that humanity is facing today and that the number one way to fight “climate change” is to reduce the number of people.

So they believe that they are actually “saving the world” by pushing a population control agenda.

For much, much more on all of this, please see the following articles…

-“The Population Control Agenda Is Being Relentlessly Pushed In American Public Schools

-“From 7 Billion People To 500 Million People – The Sick Population Control Agenda Of The Global Elite

-“Al Gore, Agenda 21 And Population Control

-“Governments Around The World Are Eagerly Adopting The Strict Population Control Agenda Of The United Nations

-“Yes, They Really Do Want To Reduce The Population – 22 Shocking Population Control Quotes From The Global Elite That Will Make You Want To Lose Your Lunch

Now that the wicked actions of the UN in Kenya have been exposed, UN officials are going to closely watch how people respond.

If there is little outrage, they will just keep on secretly sterilizing women.

That is why it is absolutely imperative that we scream bloody murder about all of this.  Great evil is being committed right in front of our eyes, and those with courage need to stand up and say that enough is enough.


Michael T. Snyder is a graduate of the McIntire School of Commerce at the University of Virginia and has a law degree and an LLM from the University of Florida Law School. He is an attorney that has worked for some of the largest and most prominent law firms in Washington D.C. and who now spends his time researching and writing and trying to wake the American people up. You can follow his work on The Economic Collapse blog, End of the American Dream and The Truth Wins. His new novel entitled “The Beginning Of The End” is now available on Amazon.com.

‘A Mass Sterilization Exercise’: Kenyan Doctors Find Anti-Fertility Agent In UN Tetanus Vaccine

kenya-tetanus-shot-population-control-900x500

By: Steve Weatherbe | lifesitenews.com

Kenya’s Catholic bishops are charging two United Nations organizations with sterilizing millions of girls and women under cover of an anti-tetanus inoculation program sponsored by the Kenyan government.

According to a statement released Tuesday by the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, the organization has found an antigen that causes miscarriages in a vaccine being administered to 2.3 million girls and women by the World Health Organization and UNICEF. Priests throughout Kenya reportedly are advising their congregations to refuse the vaccine.

“We sent six samples from around Kenya to laboratories in South Africa. They tested positive for the HCG antigen,” Dr. Muhame Ngare of the Mercy Medical Centre in Nairobi told LifeSiteNews. “They were all laced with HCG.”

Dr. Ngare, spokesman for the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, stated in a bulletin released November 4, “This proved right our worst fears; that this WHO campaign is not about eradicating neonatal tetanus but a well-coordinated forceful population control mass sterilization exercise using a proven fertility regulating vaccine. This evidence was presented to the Ministry of Health before the third round of immunization but was ignored.”

But the government says the vaccine is safe. Health Minister James Macharia even told the BBC, “I would recommend my own daughter and wife to take it because I entirely 100% agree with it and have confidence it has no adverse health effects.”

And Dr. Collins Tabu, head of the Health Ministry’s immunization branch, told the Kenyan Nation, that “there is no other additive in the vaccine other than the tetanus antigen.”

Tabu said the same vaccine has been used for 30 years in Kenya. Moreover, “there are women who were vaccinated in October 2013 and March this year who are expectant. Therefore we deny that the vaccines are laced with contraceptives.”

Newspaper stories also report women getting pregnant after being vaccinated.

Responds Dr. Ngare: “Either we are lying or the government is lying. But ask yourself, ‘What reason do the Catholic doctors have for lying?’” Dr. Ngare added: “The Catholic Church has been here in Kenya providing health care and vaccinating for 100 years for longer than Kenya has existed as a country.”

Dr. Ngare told LifeSiteNews that several things alerted doctors in the Church’s far-flung medical system of 54 hospitals, 83 health centres, and 17 medical and nursing schools to the possibility the anti-tetanus campaign was secretly an anti-fertility campaign.

Why, they ask does it involve an unprecedented five shots (or “jabs” as they are known, in Kenya) over more than two years and why is it applied only to women of child-bearing years, and why is it not being conducted without the usual fanfare of government publicity?

“Usually we give a series three shots over two to three years, we give it anyone who comes into the clinic with an open wound, men, women or children.” said Dr. Ngare. “If this is intended to inoculate children in the womb, why give it to girls starting at 15 years? You cannot get married till you are 18.” The usual way to vaccinate children is to wait till they are six weeks old.”

But it is the five-vaccination regime that is most alarming. “The only time tetanus vaccine has been given in five doses is when it is used as a carrier in fertility regulating vaccines laced with the pregnancy hormone, Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG) developed by WHO in 1992.”

It is HCG that has been found in all six samples sent to the University of Nairobi medical laboratory and another in South Africa. The bishops and doctors warn that injecting women with HCG , which mimics a natural hormone produced by pregnant women, causes them to develop antibodies against it. When they do get pregnant, and produce their own version of HCG, it triggers the production of antibodies that cause a miscarriage.

“We knew that the last time this vaccination with five injections has been used was in Mexico in 1993 and Nicaragua and the Philippines in 1994,” said Dr. Ngare. “It didn’t cause miscarriages till three years later,” which is why, he added, the counterclaims that women who got the vaccination recently and then got pregnant are meaningless.

Ngare said WHO tried to bring the same anti-fertility program into Kenya in the 1990s. “We alerted the government and it stopped the vaccination. But this time they haven’t done so.”

Ngare also contrasted the secrecy of this campaign with the usual fanfare accompanying national vaccination efforts. “They usually bring all the stakeholders together three months before the campaign, like they did with polio a little while ago. And they use staff in all the centres to give out the vaccine.” But with this anti-tetanus campaign, “only a few operatives from the government are allowed to give it out. They come with a police escort. They take it away with them when they are finished. Why not leave it with the local medical staff to administer?”

Brian Clowes of Human Life International in Virginia told LifeSite News that WHO was not involved in the Nicaragua, Mexican and Philippines campaigns. “They try to maintain a spotless record. They let organizations like United Nations Population Fund and USAID do the dirty work.”

In the previous cases, said Clowes, the vaccinators insisted their product was pure until it was shown not to be. Then they claimed the positive tests for HCG were isolated, accidental contaminations in the manufacturing process.

LifeSiteNews has obtained a UN report on an August 1992 meeting at its world headquarters in Geneva of 10 scientists from “Australia, Europe, India and the U.S.A” and 10 “women’s health advocates” from around the world, to discuss the use of “fertility regulating vaccines.” It describes the “anti-Human Chorionic Gonadotropin vaccine” as the most advanced.

One million Kenyan women and girls have been vaccinated so far with another 1.3 million to go. The vaccination is targeting women, according to the government, in order to inoculate their children in the womb against tetanus as well. The government says 550 children die of tetanus yearly.

In covering the contest of words the pro-government Nation found plenty of women who had been vaccinated and were now pregnant, even one who was the wife of a former Catholic priest who left the Church to marry. The paper ignored Kenya’s reliance on the Catholic medical system, while setting the bishops’ stand in a questionable historical context of irrational responses “largely based on religious beliefs,” the more recent murder of vaccination teams in Nigeria, and even of CIA conspiracy theories.

Why would the UN want to suppress the population in developing countries? “Racism,” is Brian Clowes’ first explanation.  “Also, the developed countries want to get hold of their natural resources. And lately, there is the whole bogus global warming thing.”

Dr. Ngare said it was the Catholic Church’s hope that the government could have resolved the matter quietly by testing the vaccine. “But the government has chosen to be combative,” forcing Kenya’s bishops and Catholic doctors to go public.

WHO’s Kenyan office and several WHO media contacts in Washington, D.C. failed to respond to LifeSiteNews enquiries over a 24-hour period.

Population Reduction Through Vaccine Poisons

bill gates vaccine depopulation

Attitudes toward medical ailments and treatment vary widely, usually based upon the degree of trust in the type of health care practice that a patient believes to be the best healing method. The AMA is an advocacy association that promotes the validity of medical therapy heavily based upon manufactured designer drugs. The establishment corporatist scientists have a tendency to claim a corner on proof. However, they often expound on their accepted view using selective memory. Facts can stand in the way of implementing the master plan when the “so called” humanitarian benefits remain elusive or worse, detrimental.

Primum non nocere as stated in The Hippocratic Oath is the original casualty in the practice of NWO health care.   

The high priestess of orthodox medicine, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention publishes on their site, Possible Side-effects from Vaccines, and provides the obligatory disclaimer. 

“Remember, vaccines are continually monitored for safety, and like any medication, vaccines can cause side effects. However, a decision not to immunize a child also involves risk and could put the child and others who come into contact with him or her at risk of contracting a potentially deadly disease.” 

A far more factual viewpoint is presented on Weigh the Risks of Vaccination. 

“A common assumption is that vaccines’ benefits outweigh the risks.  But given evidence that the increase in the number of vaccines since the late 1980’s may be linked to corresponding increases in many chronic childhood health conditions, do the benefits outweigh the risks of the current USA vaccination schedule? To answer this question, we undertook a theoretical analysis to calculate the risk from diseases to an unvaccinated child in the first 5 years of life, and then compare that to the risk of vaccine-injury in the first 5 years of life if that child is vaccinated per the USA schedule.  To make a valid comparison of disease risks to the unvaccinated child, we sought to calculate risk of injury from disease in two cases:  1) the risk in a highly vaccinated population and 2) the risk in a population with low vaccination. Where there is current evidence in the USA of herd immunity for a disease, this effect is considered in the highly vaccinated case (see A SmartVax Discussion on Herd Immunity). To perform the analysis, we made several assumptions about how to calculate risk (see Assumptions for Weigh The Risks Analysis) including a decision to focus on only four of the childhood chronic health conditions that may be vaccine-induced: Asthma, Autism, ADHD, and Allergies.” 

The results from studies that conflict with the myths that are central to the pharmacology industry cannot be allowed to go “mainstream” and influence the public. Generating money is a foremost ingredient in the profit pill paradigm. Notwithstanding, a far more sinister objective lingers in the bowels of the medical eugenics labs. 

Christina England writes in the essay, Bill Gates’ Polio Vaccine Program Eradicates Children, Not Polio. 

“In the depths of cyberspace lurks a press release written by the CDC, confirming that the OPV, or oral polio vaccination, given to millions of children throughout the developing world, is causing them to develop vaccine-induced polio. Instead of banning the vaccination, as one would expect, the CDC has decided in its wisdom that the best way to tackle the problem is to maintain a high rate of vaccination in all countries!” 

The report, Depopulation: Gates pushes nanoparticle vaccine, Giant leap against mankind links to some disturbing information. 

Depopulation might take a giant leap if a Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research (HCI) proposal in “Grand Challenges Explorations” is granted as it will have a million Gates Foundation US dollars to develop a nanoparticle vaccine on contact with human perspiration according to a written statement released Wednesday. Bill Gates, who has stated in a TED presentation that vaccines are a favored method of depopulation, is promoting this project touted as a way to save lives, but raising concerns about negative eugenics and violation of the human right to self-determination including right to informed consent.” 

The video, Bill Gates Admits Vaccines Are Used for Human Depopulation reveals the ultimate objective of the vaccine strategy. 

Alas, karma comes home to roost for the master programmer of the vaccine dispenser. Wonder how long it will take for the magic seeds from Monsanto to strangle the international courts? 

India Holds Bill Gates Accountable For His Vaccine Crimes, “A recent report published by Health Impact News has reported that the Gates Foundation has found itself facing a pending lawsuit, due to an investigation that is being carried out by the Supreme Courts of India.” 

Health Impact News stated: 

“While fraud and corruption are revealed on almost a daily basis now in the vaccine industry, the U.S. mainstream media continues to largely ignore such stories. Outside the U.S., however, the vaccine empires are beginning to crumble, and English versions of the news in mainstream media outlets are available via the Internet. 

One such country is India, where the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and their vaccine empire are under fire, including a pending lawsuit currently being investigated by the India Supreme Court.” 

Is it not ironic that the guru of internet infections wants to be the anti-virus specialist? Being in charge of reducing the animal kingdom must have its attraction for Bilderberg surgeons of the human matrix. While one of those nasty facts is that the bulk of the mankind idiots do not understand the nature of the global struggle, it is a monumental immoral leap to devise an injected answer to implement an angel of death solution, to eliminate ignorance in order to protect the self-appointed and purported enlightened. 

Jon Rappoport authors the article; we come to vaccines and depopulation experiments which should be read in its entirety. 

“You have to understand that every promoted so-called “pandemic” is an extended sales pitch for vaccines.  

And not just a vaccine against the “killer germ” of the moment. We’re talking about a psyop to condition the population to vaccines in general.  

There is much available literature on vaccines used for depopulation experiments. The research is ongoing. Undoubtedly, we only know a fraction of what is happening behind closed laboratory doors.”

Mr. Rappoport’s zinger that you will not hear about on MSNBC. 

“Depopulation has several objectives. Along one vector, it is an elite strategy designed to get rid of large numbers of people, in key areas of the world, where local revolutions would interfere with outside corporations staging a complete takeover of fertile land and rich natural resources.  

An astonishing journal paper. November, 1993. FASEB Journal, volume 7, pp.1381-1385. Authors—Stephan Dirnhofer et al. Dirnhofer was a member of the Institute for Biomedical Aging Research of the Austrian Academy of Sciences.  

A quote from the paper: “Our study provides insights into possible modes of action of the birth control vaccine promoted by the Task Force on Birth Control Vaccines of the WHO (World Health Organization).”

A birth control vaccine?  

Yes.  

A vaccine whose purpose is to achieve non-pregnancy where it ordinarily could occur. This particular vaccine was apparently just one of several anti-fertility vaccines the Task Force was promoting.“ 

This essay is a thorough summary of the health scares and the comprehensive program to reduce the useless eaters. What an accommodating medical system that breeds the artful practice of implementing the pro-choice termination outcome, when actual choice is never given.  

Martin S. Pernick, PhD addresses Eugenics and Public Health in American History, which provides U.S. legal precedent and standard for mandatory compliance. 

“Forcible sterilization of the unfit like-wise drew on both the values and the example of infection control laws. The main legal precedent cited in Buck v Bell, the 1927 Supreme Court decision upholding involuntary eugenic sterilization, was Jacobson v Massachusetts, the 1905 case allowing mandatory smallpox vaccination. As Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes explained in Buck v Bell, ‘The principle that sustains compulsory vaccination is broad enough to cover cutting the Fallopian.” 

In making this connection, the Court identified three key values that compulsory sterilization shared with vaccination laws. First, preventing disease was better than coping with its consequences. Second, the collective well-being of society could outweigh the interests of individuals who posed an alleged health menace. And third, state power could compel compliance with health measures when persuasion alone appeared inadequate.” 

Maybe this criterion is lost in the Ebola panic by the CDC and the Obama administration. However, the underpinning that vaccine treatment are automatically the health miracle that infectious diseases medicine would have you believe mostly goes unchallenged within the political establishment.  

The huge windfall profit to the pharmaceutical labs that claim to have a cure for the Ebola epidemic may in fact be a side show. More likely the psyops exercise may well be part of an experimental trial run to prepare the public for the eventual compulsory shots directives. 

If vaccines carry substantial risks under normal treatment, just what should the compliant sheeple expect when a true global militaritized pandemic is released by the NWO elites?


SARTRE is the pen name of James Hall, a reformed, former political operative. This pundit’s formal instruction in History, Philosophy and Political Science served as training for activism, on the staff of several politicians and in many campaigns. A believer in authentic Public Service, independent business interests were pursued in the private sector. As a small business owner and entrepreneur, several successful ventures expanded opportunities for customers and employees. Speculation in markets, and international business investments, allowed for extensive travel and a world view for commerce. He is retired and lives with his wife in a rural community. “Populism” best describes the approach to SARTRE’s perspective on Politics. Realities, suggest that American Values can be restored with an appreciation of “Pragmatic Anarchism.” Reforms will require an Existential approach. “Ideas Move the World,” and SARTRE’S intent is to stir the conscience of those who desire to bring back a common sense, moral and traditional value culture for America. Not seeking fame nor fortune, SARTRE’s only goal is to ask the questions that few will dare … Having refused the invites of an academic career because of the hypocrisy of elite’s, the search for TRUTH is the challenge that is made to all readers. It starts within yourself and is achieved only with your sincere desire to face Reality. So who is SARTRE? He is really an ordinary man just like you, who invites you to join in on this journey. Visit his website at http://batr.org.

Obamacare Architect Says Society Would Be Better Off If People Only Lived To Age 75

Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel

Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, brother of Rahm Emanuel, says that society would be far better off if people quit trying to live past age 75.  His new article entitled “Why I Hope To Die At 75” has the following very creepy subtitle: “An argument that society and families—and you—will be better off if nature takes its course swiftly and promptly”.  In the article, Emanuel forcefully argues that the quality of life for most people is significantly diminished past the age of 75 and that once we get to that age we should refuse any more medical care that will extend our lifespans.  This is quite chilling to read, considering the fact that this is coming from one of the key architects of Obamacare.  Of course he never uses the term “death panels” in his article, but that is obviously what Emanuel would want in a perfect world.  To Emanuel, it is inefficient to waste medical resources on those that do not have a high “quality of life”.  So he says that “75 is a pretty good age to aim to stop”.

Emanuel believes in this philosophy so much that he says that he would like to die at age 75.  Of course he has no intention of committing suicide, but if he happened to drop dead once he hits his 75th birthday he would be very happy about that.  The following is an excerpt from his new article

I am talking about how long I want to live and the kind and amount of health care I will consent to after 75. Americans seem to be obsessed with exercising, doing mental puzzles, consuming various juice and protein concoctions, sticking to strict diets, and popping vitamins and supplements, all in a valiant effort to cheat death and prolong life as long as possible. This has become so pervasive that it now defines a cultural type: what I call the American immortal.

I reject this aspiration. I think this manic desperation to endlessly extend life is misguided and potentially destructive. For many reasons, 75 is a pretty good age to aim to stop.

And so Emanuel plans to start rejecting pretty much all medical tests and treatments that will prolong his life once he reaches that age

At 75 and beyond, I will need a good reason to even visit the doctor and take any medical test or treatment, no matter how routine and painless. And that good reason is not “It will prolong your life.” I will stop getting any regular preventive tests, screenings, or interventions. I will accept only palliative—not curative—treatments if I am suffering pain or other disability.

This means colonoscopies and other cancer-screening tests are out—and before 75. If I were diagnosed with cancer now, at 57, I would probably be treated, unless the prognosis was very poor. But 65 will be my last colonoscopy. No screening for prostate cancer at any age. (When a urologist gave me a PSA test even after I said I wasn’t interested and called me with the results, I hung up before he could tell me. He ordered the test for himself, I told him, not for me.) After 75, if I develop cancer, I will refuse treatment. Similarly, no cardiac stress test. No pacemaker and certainly no implantable defibrillator. No heart-valve replacement or bypass surgery. If I develop emphysema or some similar disease that involves frequent exacerbations that would, normally, land me in the hospital, I will accept treatment to ameliorate the discomfort caused by the feeling of suffocation, but will refuse to be hauled off.

A couple of decades ago, an article like this would have sparked mass public outrage.

But today, this article hardly even gets any attention.

That is because this kind of philosophy has spread everywhere.  It is being taught at colleges and universities across the United States and it is even represented throughout the ranks of the Obama administration.

For example, Barack Obama’s top science adviser John P. Holdren believes that implanting sterilization capsules under the skin of women could be a way to reduce the size of the population and increase the quality of life for everyone…

A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men.

The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births.

Yes, this guy is a total nutjob.

But he also has the ear of the man occupying the White House.

And we are not just talking about a few isolated crazies like Holdren.  This agenda have been fully embraced by our politicians in Washington.

For instance, did you know that the federal government actually has an “Office of Population Affairs“?

On the website of the Office of Population Affairs, you can find information about abortion, female sterilization, male sterilization and a vast array of contraceptive choices.

U.S. taxpayers are paying for all of this, but most people don’t even know that it exists.

Of course this agenda has been moved forward by both Democrats and Republicans for decades.

And the woman that is very likely to be our next president is also a very strong proponent of this philosophy.

When Hillary Clinton accepted Planned Parenthood’s Margaret Sanger Award back in 2009, she spoke glowingly of Sanger…

In a speech to the Planned Parenthood Federation of America Awards Gala, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said that she admires “Margaret Sanger enormously, her courage, her tenacity, her vision.” Secretary Clinton said she is “really in awe of” Sanger for Sanger’s early work in Brooklyn, New York, “taking on archetypes, taking on attitudes and accusations flowing from all directions.”

But the truth is that Sanger was deeply racist and was determined to do whatever she could to help control the population growth of the poor.  The following is one of her most famous statements

“The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”

Hillary Clinton is also a huge supporter of the United Nations Population Fund.  If you are not familiar with the United Nations Population Fund, it is an organization that funds abortion, forced sterilization and brutal eugenics programs throughout the developing world.

Population control advocates such as Emanuel, Holdren and Clinton are fully convinced that they are doing the right thing.

They actually believe that the world will be a better place if less people are born and if the elderly do not live as long.

So what do you think?  Please share your thoughts by posting a comment below…


Michael T. Snyder is a graduate of the McIntire School of Commerce at the University of Virginia and has a law degree and an LLM from the University of Florida Law School. He is an attorney that has worked for some of the largest and most prominent law firms in Washington D.C. and who now spends his time researching and writing and trying to wake the American people up. You can follow his work on The Economic Collapse blog, End of the American Dream and The Truth Wins. His new novel entitled “The Beginning Of The End” is now available on Amazon.com.

Who Updated The Georgia Guidestones? (VIDEO)

guidestones updated

The elite’s cryptic monument to depopulation and world government just became more mysterious (and a whole lot creepier) – somebody has officially updated it with an engraved cube marking the year 2014 inserted into the English/Spanish slab of the ‘new 10 commandments’ for the ‘Age of Reason’ desired by its creators.


Produced by Truthstream Media.

The full GA Guidestones 2014 video at KafkaWinstonWorld on YT

The GA Guidestones Guidebook

Why Does The U.S. Government Have An ‘Office Of Population Affairs’?

depopulation

Did you know that the federal government has an “Office of Population Affairs”?  I didn’t realize this either until someone sent me a link to their website.  The Office of Population Affairs operates under the umbrella of the Department of Health & Human Services, and it might as well be called “The Office of Population Control” because almost everything on the website is about controlling or reducing the size of the population.  On the site you can find information and resources about abortion, female sterilization, male sterilization and a vast array of contraceptive choices.  There is even a search engine where you can find a local “family planning clinic” where you can get rid of any “unintended pregnancy” that may be bothering you.  Frankly, it sickens me to think that my tax dollars are being used to fund all of this.

But the Office of Population Affairs is not just pro-abortion and pro-sterilization.  On the page describing their “purpose and mission”, they actually admit that “population research” and studying “population growth” are part of their core work.  The following is an excerpt from the official OPA website

**********

Title X is the only federal program dedicated solely to the provision of family planning and related preventive services. The Office of Population Affairs (OPA) administers the Title X program and serves as the focal point to advise the Secretary and the Assistant Secretary for Health on a wide range of reproductive health topics, including family planning, adolescent pregnancy, sterilization and other population issues.

The Office of Population Affairs operates under the direction of the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Population Affairs.

Family Planning Mission
To assist individuals in determining the number and spacing of their children through the provision of voluntary, confidential and low-cost education, counseling, and related comprehensive medical services to eligible clients:

  • To assist in making comprehensive, voluntary family planning services available to all persons desiring such services;

  • To coordinate domestic population and family planning research with the present and future needs of family planning programs;

  • To enable public and nonprofit private entities to plan and develop comprehensive programs of family planning services;

  • To develop and make readily available information, including educational materials, on family planning and population growth to all persons desiring such information;

  • To evaluate and improve the effectiveness of family planning service programs and population research; and

  • To assist in training staff to effectively carry out family planning services

**********

And needless to say, the goal is never to increase the size of the population.

At least in the old days these population control advocates were more honest about what they were trying to do.  For example,Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger once made the following statement

“The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”

Sadly, this sick and twisted philosophy is not just limited to one specific department of the federal government.

The truth is that this worldview is represented at the highest levels in the White House itself.  Barack Obama repeatedly mentions how much he depends on the advice of his top science adviser John P. Holdren.  Well, as many of you probably already know, Holdren is an enthusiastic proponent of extreme population control measures.

The following is what one writer discovered when he investigated Holdren’s writings…

He offered that “a comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural resources … The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries’ shares within their regional limits … The Regime would have some power to enforce the agreed limits.”

Holdren, et al, believe this global body possesses “ample authority under which population growth could be regulated.” Hiding behind the passive voice, they wrote, “it has been concluded”—by whom?—”that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.” (Emphasis added.) They added that if parents were guilty of “overproducing children, and if the need is compelling, they can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility.”

To further reduce the West’s population and carbon footprint, the “de-development of overdeveloped countries…should be given top priority.”

Holdren further, repeatedly, proposed the United States transfer $1.43 trillion to $2.86 trillion of U.S. GNP to Third-World countries every year for several decades.

Isn’t that disturbing?

This is the guy telling Obama what he should believe about scientific matters.

In a previous article, I included this gem from Holdren…

A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men.

The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births.

But to be fair, this is not the first president that has had a nutjob like this as his top science adviser.  George W. Bush actually employed Paul Ehrlich, the author of “The Population Bomb”, as his top science official.  In many ways, Ehrlich is even more extreme than Holdren is.  Here are a couple of quotes from Ehrlich

“To our minds, the fundamental cure, reducing the scale of the human enterprise (including the size of the population) to keep its aggregate consumption within the carrying capacity of Earth is obvious but too much neglected or denied”

**********

“Nobody, in my view, has the right to have 12 children or even three unless the second pregnancy is twins”

Remember, these are not just two nutty professors from the lunatic fringe.  These are highly respected members of the scientific community that are personally advising our presidents.

And the leading contender to become the next president is also surrounded by these types of people.

For example, a key adviser to Hillary Clinton named Nina Fedoroff once made the following statement

“We need to continue to decrease the growth rate of the global population; the planet can’t support many more people.”

It is not politically expedient for our politicians to come right out and proclaim that they are for population control while they are on the campaign trail.

But if you look at their actions and at the people that they surround themselves with, the message is exceedingly clear.

So what do you think about all of this?  Please feel free to share your thoughts by posting a comment below…


Michael T. Snyder is a graduate of the McIntire School of Commerce at the University of Virginia and has a law degree and an LLM from the University of Florida Law School. He is an attorney that has worked for some of the largest and most prominent law firms in Washington D.C. and who now spends his time researching and writing and trying to wake the American people up. You can follow his work on The Economic Collapse blog, End of the American Dream and The Truth Wins. His new novel entitled “The Beginning Of The End” is now available on Amazon.com.

Thousands Of U.K. Doctors Are Putting Patients On ‘Death Lists’ And Denying Them Treatment

elderly patient

The face of government-run socialized medicine just keeps getting uglier in Britain, where as many as 3,000 doctors are set to place many thousands more patients on so-called “death registers” where they are ultimately denied treatment – all to save a buck.

Or in this case, a pound.

Being placed on the registers means those patients have been singled out “to be allowed to die in comfort rather than be given life-saving treatment in hospital,” Britain’s Daily Mail reported.

Some 3,000 doctors are expected to draw up lists of patients they expect will die within a year, according to Department of Health data the paper reviewed, noting that the registers were part of an unpublicized program that has been endorsed by government ministers.

Physicians who are general practitioners “have been encouraged to make lists – officially known as End of Life Care Registers – of people they believe are going to die soon and should be helped to do so in comfort,” the paper said.

Doctors were asked specifically, according to the report, to pay particular attention to elderly patients who develop signs and symptoms of frailty or deterioration during routine consultations for surgery.

Worse, those who have been identified and put on the registers don’t even know about it; the paper said despite the fact that 7,000 patients have been added to the lists, there doesn’t appear to be any obligation for physicians to inform their patients of the decision.

So much for the time-honored tradition of a doctor doing no harm.

Do British physicians have crystal balls that can predict the future?

But what to expect, really? This is how a broke, overextended, over-promised 21st century Western-style government solves part of its budget problem: By denying the very benefits taxpayers (who are still paying for them, by the way) were guaranteed, just when they need them most.

Fortunately for English patients, some medical professionals in Britain still have some scruples; they are going public with their concerns (though they were prompted to do so after an earlier Daily Mail report disclosing that the country’s National Health System requested doctors to put one in every 100 of their patients on the death registers).

Dr. Peter Saunders, of the Christian Medical Fellowship, warned about drawing up “quotas” for some patients. What, for instance, if they were wrong about the expected “death” timetable?

“We all know that doctors’ estimates of patients’ life spans can be sometimes accurate but sometimes wildly inaccurate,” he said. “A skilled doctor can in the great majority of cases assess when a patient is within a few hours or days of death. However, once we start to talk about weeks or months we know that we can often be right, but equally very badly wrong.”

The NHS is apparently pushing for the lists at a time when a cornerstone of the services’ “end of life strategy,” the Liverpool Care Pathway, “has come under fierce criticism from leading medical figures and families who believe their loved ones have been wrongly picked out in hospitals as dying,” said the paper.

Another critic of the Pathway, NHS consultant Prof. Patrick Pullicino, called it a self-fulfilling prophecy and amounts to little more than assisted death.

Lame excuses – ‘It does not mean they are automatically’ going to die

Guidance for physicians says patients placed on the registers should be asked if they want to die at home instead of in a hospital so NHS can save even more money.

Patients are also being encouraged to create “living wills,” which tell doctors to withhold feeding tubes if they become too sick to speak. Such patients are “less likely to be subject to treatments of limited clinical value,” physicians have been told.

The end-of-life program director, Prof. Sir Mike Richards, said in the report that the campaign to enlist general practitioners “has reached its midpoint target of 1,000″ as of August 2012.

“Patients can be placed on the GP End of Life Care register without their knowledge. However, being on this register purely means they have been identified as needing an end of life care plan,” said the Department of Health. “It does not mean they are automatically placed on an end of life pathway. It does not mean they will not receive treatment.”

The report said by the end of March, doctors had registers in operation that contained 7,723 names, of which 2,534 were diagnosed with illness other than cancer, while 3,531 patients had agreed to “advanced care planning,” which can include agreeing to a living will.

A separate report by the paper said British hospitals spend less to feed patients than is spent by the government to feed prisoners.

Sources:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk

http://www.dailymail.co.uk

http://nation.foxnews.com

Read More at Natural News

What Is The World Health Organization?

The World Health Organization, or WHO, was officially established in 1948 by the United Nations. It was created with the goal of standardizing international health policies and practices to achieve “the attainment by all peoples of the highest possible level of health.”

WHO is the organization behind the curtain (or one of such) that pushes flouridation around the world as a means of eugenics. Since the organization is so large and has public support around the world, they have been very successful.

http://www.infowars.com/world-health-organization-fluoridate-water-supply-population-specifically

The WHO is very corrupt – the global mother of USA’s AMA. You see, big pharma, FDA, CDC, USDA, DHS (Department of Human Services) are becoming entwined and somewhat merged, causing a complete breakdown of our medical, health and human services systems.

I speculate that the deterioration of all of these organizations from the top down, is due to the WHO’s influence and control in round-about ways. The WHO is just another moving part of the New World Order (NWO); a branch of it, if you will – of which I am sure many will come to me and call me a conspirator for saying such ‘nonsense’. Any organization that seeks global dominance in any way is a dangerous organization, which we should all scrutinize. Not only does WHO wish to control our healthcare, they also wish to control our food supply. This is one avenue where Monsanto comes in. Monsanto is much bigger than most people think and the history goes way back.

As every nation in the world marches forward to a completely integrated and globalized society, the control of food is an absolute necessity for those who seek to accelerate amalgamation. It is for this reason that we see an increase in domestic legislation that mirrors the guidelines and demands of international standard-setting organizations. These attempts at harmonization of national laws, specifically those regarding food, are coming in daily from all sides of the globe.

Whether it’s the GMO fight in the United States, as well as other countries, or the question of the level of vitamins and minerals in supplements, the Biotech Corporations are continually winning most of their battles with the help of mass ignorance, national governments, the World Trade Organization (WTO) and similar entities.

Indeed, when one begins to examine many of the debates regarding food and food regulation, one name appears over and over – Codex Alimentarius.

For those who may be unaware of what Codex Alimentarius is, I refer you to a book called  Codex Alimentarius – The End of Health Freedom, or you can read it, via this website. Briefly speaking, however, Codex Alimentarius is an agency created under the Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) and the WHO, and thereby functions under direction of the United Nations (UN).

Codex Alimentarius sets the standards by which the World Trade Organization implements its dispute settlements and international trade policies. Codex Guidelines, once agreed upon, are enforced by the WTO and other related treaties. Essentially, Codex Alimentarius sets the standards for the world regarding food, vitamins and minerals, GMO’s, and almost everything else that humans consume.

Although the influence of Codex Alimentarius can be seen the world over, New Zealanders were targets of the international standard-setting organization via a food bill titled Food Bill 160-2 in 2011.

Similar to legislation passed in the United States, the New Zealand Food Bill essentially turns the right to grow food and share it with others into a regulated and controlled privilege. Food Bill 160-2 would also allow for the control of seeds (specifically heirloom seeds), and the creation of Food Safety Officers that would serve to police the newly designated and loosely termed “food producers.” It would also effectively end the ability of individuals to become and remain self-sufficient. “Control the food supply; control the people”.

For instance, the bill defines food so as to include any plant or animal (living or dead by the definitions set forth in the bill) intended for human consumption, as well as: any ingredient or nutrient or other constituent of any food or drink, whether that ingredient or nutrient or other constituent is consumed or represented for consumption on its own by humans, or is used in the preparation of, or mixed with or added to, any food or drink; and anything that is or is intended to be mixed with or added to any food or drink.

Furthermore, giving broad and alarming levels of power to the Governor-General, “anything that is declared by the Governor-General, by Order in Council made under section 355, to be food for the purposes of this Act” will also fall under the jurisdiction of Bill 160-2.

So much is included in just the “Definitions” section of the bill one could almost write a twenty-page article just on the connotations provided by Section 8 alone. Regardless, as one can clearly see from reading the small portion of the bill quoted above, the terms of the bill are all-encompassing.

Herein, food is defined literally as anything that can be consumed by humans and it retains this definition at whatever the stage of its development.

Therefore, corn may be considered food whenever it is being sold at a market. It may be considered food when it is being shucked, and it may be considered food when it is being grown. It is also considered food before being grown — in seed form.

Not only that, but because many seeds themselves are consumed by humans, seeds naturally fall under this tyrannical legislation as much as anything else.

As a result of the new policies to be implemented as a result of Food Bill 160-2, anyone then engaged in producing and distributing food would be subject to the regulation and monitoring of the new authorization program. Of course, the classification of “food producer,” applies to individuals who grow two or three tomato plants for their own consumption as much as it does to major Agri-businesses.

That being said, there are clearly financial concerns with the new bill, as well. Obviously, Big-Agra would easily be able to pay the monitoring fees for the new Soviet program while small farmers, where they still exist, could not. In addition, individuals would certainly no longer be able to continue selling their food at the local farmers market, local restaurants, or even to other individuals.

True to form, the questions regarding the new legislation are being brushed off by the New Zealand government, particularly those individuals in the New Zealand government who have been pushing the bill from the start.

For instance, Kate Wilkinson, New Zealand Minister of Food Safety stated that concerns over the Food Bill were part of some kind of “conspiracy theory” and that she didn’t understand where all this “conspiracy theory” was coming from.

Before I continue, I must ask if all this doesn’t sound eerily familiar. It certainly does to me. (That phrase is getting so played out by now)

In 2010 when the United States Congress was busy passing S.510, a bill that was very similar if not identical in scope to the New Zealand Food Bill, we heard the same cat calls of “conspiracy theory” launched at anyone who criticized the impending legislation. Now, after the U.S. government is constantly publicly raiding organic food shops, raw milk distributors, the Amish, small farmers, nutrition supplement shops, etc. etc. with guns drawn by clownish looking SWAT teams, the name-calling is a bit harder to justify.

The similarities between the law in the United States and New Zealand are quite striking, so much in fact that they can scarcely be considered a coincidence — especially when both of these bills are themselves disturbingly similar to Codex Alimentarius Guidelines and recommendations. Indeed, upon closer examination it appears that there is more of a pattern than some members of national governments would have us believe. No doubt this is almost always the case.

But, back to Miss “Conspiracy Theory” Kate Wilkinson for a moment. To answer her question as to where all the “conspiracy theories” have come from, perhaps she should look at her own statements.

In a letter to Green MP, Sue Kedgley, who has expressed some attenuated level of criticism toward the bill, Wilkinson wrote:

“The barter or selling of propagation food seeds and food seedlings is in scope [of the Bill] . . . However the sale or exchange of seeds for propagation, and seedlings (whether this occurs in the context of a garden center, a market, or between those in a community of interest), is not intended to be captured.”

Wilkinson openly admits that seeds can and will be controlled under the new food bill. Hardly a conspiracy theory when the antagonist actually admits it to be true.

Of course, before one gets their hopes up in regards to the Green Party, one should bear in mind that politics are politics and the theater of public opinion is much the same in New Zealand as it is in the United States. The Green Party itself initially voted for this bill. The organization states, “Ignore the Green Party dog-and-pony show propaganda. The Greens, who voted for the Bill at first reading, know the truth is coming out now and are dissembling for extra election votes).” Obviously, the political climate is exactly the same in every country with exactly the same result.

In the end, there should be no mistake as to the goal of these new laws, whether they be in the United States, New Zealand, or anywhere else for that matter. As the world marches faster and faster toward totalitarianism, the ability of individuals to become self-sufficient must be destroyed before the control system can fully assert itself. This, in fact, is an integral part of the system in the first place. This is causing manufactured famines in areas and thus leading people to believe we are running out of resources, due to overpopulation. Just what the green parties and our governments want you to believe, to condone the eugenics programs.

The UN’s Agenda 21 is already making its way into every city, under the guise of “sustainable development”, also being pushed by the green parties, eco-friendly organizations and the Centers for biodiversity. Next, we will lose our rights to own property and procreate – it will be left to those with certain bloodlines. These organizations are merely the domestic ground-level implementation of international policy handed down from Codex Alimentarius, the WTO, WHO, and the United Nations, entities that are themselves nothing more than tools in the Great Work known as the New World Order.

Bill Gates-Funded Birth Control Microchip (VIDEO)

bill gates

Here’s one more for the coming “Internet of Things” — an implantable birth control microchip could hit the U.S. market by 2018 thanks to funding by globalist billionaire and population control enthusiast Bill Gates.

The new microchip implant reportedly lasts up to 16 years and can be controlled via wireless remote device, but don’t worry; researchers are quick to reassure that each microchip comes with “secure encryption” (you know, the kind that’s even being hacked and exploited in the new smart light bulbs).

Considering this is the same guy who has also funded an oral bait vaccine that sterilizes rats (see: “Rodent Biocontrol and Crop Protectionhere) and genetically engineered vaccinating mosquitoes, a treatment that by its very nature couldn’t possibly generate the consent of all patients involved, the profound implications of Gates’ new birth control microchip on human reproduction are astounding.

Of course…this technology could also fulfill the use described by current White House Science Czar John P. Holdren and his writing partner Paul Ehrlich in their 1977 text Ecoscience for involuntary fertility control when they declared, “The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births.” (Pp. 786-7)


Aaron Dykes and Melissa Melton created TruthstreamMedia.com, where this first appeared, as an outlet to examine the news, uncover the deceptions, pierce through the fabric of illusions, know the real enemy, unshackle from the system, and begin to imagine the path towards taking back our lives, one step at a time, so that one day we might truly be free…