Tag Archives: police state

Jade Helm: 10 Deeper Implications

jade helm

Operation Jade Helm 15 is coming to a state near you!

People all over America are wondering what the true purpose of Jade Helm is, whether it is linked to coming emergencies or catastrophes, and whether it is being used to condition the public to accept military intrusion in their lives (or a possible marital law scenario). The US military and mainstream media are downplaying its significance, yet a closer examination reveals there is valid cause for concern.

Jade Helm 15 is a military exercise slated to occur from July 15, 2015 until September 15, 2015. It was initially scheduled for 7 states (California, Nevada, Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Utah and Texas), but now includes 3 more states (Louisiana, Mississippi and Florida). For the first time ever, it will feature American soldiers actively practicing on American soil and American streets – especially on streets, since this operation focuses on urban warfare. These won’t be just any old American soldiers, but the cream of the crop, composed of Green Beret, Navy Seal and other elite forces. According to the US Military, their mission will be to operate undetected amongst the American civilian population, wearing civilian clothes and driving civilian vehicles, and practice UW (Unconventional Warfare) techniques in terrain resembling the Middle East so as to better fight enemies over there. At least, that is the cover story.

Here is a list of 10 deeper implications and causes for concern with Operation Jade Helm 15:

Jade Helm Implication #1: Violation of Principle of Posse Comitatus

The Posse Comitatus Act was passed in 1878, and it forbade the US military from being deployed domestically on American soil. The purpose of Posse Comitatus was to prevent a tyrant from seizing power and directing the nation’s standing armies against its own people. This kind of thing has happened throughout history; military generals like Julius Caesar and Pompey overtook the Roman Republic by marching upon the city of Rome with their armies. Posse Comitatus is a very important plank in a free society, because it is another way to prevent centralization of power and keep the different functions and powers of Government as separate as possible.

Jade Helm appears to be a serious violation of the principle of Posse Comitatus. Not only are the military planning to actively exercise on American soil, but also they are planning to do it among the civilian population, within populated areas. However before Jade Helm arose we already had the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act, passed in 2006, which in many ways gutted Posse Comitatus. As Eric Alterman and George Zornick write:

“Before John Warner passed, the president could deploy troops inside the United States only if he invoked the Insurrection Act of 1807, which allows for deployment only “to suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy.” The new law expands the list to include “natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health emergency, terrorist attack or incident, or other condition”—and such a “condition” is not defined or limited.”

Jade Helm looks like another step in the direction of domestic military deployment – a nail in the coffin for a free republic.

Jade Helm Implication #2: Declaring Certain States Hostile

The Jade Helm operational map: Southwest USA with a Middle East overlay

The Jade Helm operational map: Southwest USA with a Middle East overlay

The supposed basis of Jade Helm is that the US military needs to practice in the same kind of terrain as its Middle Eastern enemies. Since the Middle East is full of different countries whose attitudes towards the US range from hostile to neutral to friendly, the US military has designated certain US states as hostile, to mimic these Middle Eastern countries. When you overlay a Middle Eastern map over the southwest USA, Texas is roughly comparable to Iran, Utah is roughly comparable to Syria and the “insurgent pocket” of California is roughly comparable to Palestine. Thus these 3 areas have been declared hostile for the purposes of Jade Helm.

From a civilian perspective, declaring certain states hostile is a real cause for concern. Texas has a culture of fierce independence and resistance to federal control. Is it just a coincidence that Texas is 1 of the 2 states fully designated as “hostile” in Jade Helm? Is it just a coincidence that Texas just passed legislation to build its own gold bullion depository in order to repatriate $1 billion worth of gold currently stored by the Federal Reserve in New York? Is it just a coincidence that Texas is the state labeled as “hostile” when it’s home to a massive number of gun owners, patriots, secessionists and liberty lovers who would fight the Federal Government to the death?

Jade Helm Implication #3: More War

Even if you take everything the US Military is saying at face value – a big jump I know – and even if you believe that the declaration of certain states as “hostile” is completely innocuous, standard and has no deeper meaning, what are the implications for war? The US has already raised the ire of almost the entire world by its constant invasions, bombings, incursions, drone attacks and assassinations in the Middle East. It has made countless enemies since 9/11 by attempting to conquer that entire region. It has murdered millions of Middle Easteners and has stolen tons of oil and other natural resources from the land. But apparently this is not enough. Now, the NWO elite want to continue using the US military, which is essentially their private army of killers and assassins, to further obliterate Syria and Iran to dominate the entire region – with an eye to encircling Russia and China. Do we really want to ignore or condone the US military training to accomplish its mission of unbridled aggression?

Jade Helm Implication #4: Martial Law or Military Conditioning

The widespread exposure of Jade Helm has led many to predict that it will lead to martial law. Whether this is an accurate prediction or fear-based prophesizing remains to be seen, however one thing is for sure: even if the exercise does not produce martial law, it is definitely conditioning the American public to accept and become accustomed to an increased police/military presence in their lives. Jade Helm is the elite sending a message to the general US population: get used to living in fear. Get used to living in a world where it is normal for the military to patrol among your ranks, disguised or out in the open. Get used to being watched closely. Get used to the sight and sound of military being deployed in your town. Welcome to New World Order America.

Jade Helm Implication #5: The Merging of Military and Police

Jade Helm is another example of a disturbing trend: the merging of the military and police into a single force that can be deployed anywhere, abroad or domestically, against anyone. This force then becomes, essentially, the private army of the elite that can be use against any group that threatens their power structure. For some time now, both in the US and other nations, we have witnessed the growing militarization of the police; in the US this has been aided by programs like 1033, where surplus military equipment is deliberately being funneled to local police forces. The merging of military and police is a big danger to any democracy, due to the gross centralization of power it entails.

Jade Helm Implication #6: US Military Targeting US Citizens

Whenever you dream about, talk about or practice an activity, your brain is learning how do it by making neuron patterns. The US military practicing to target its own citizens is anything but benign and harmless. This literally means that US soldiers are getting accustomed to seeing their own countrymen as the enemy. Jade Helm is not only about conditioning the public to accept an increasingly militarized society, but it’s also about conditioning the future enforcers of the New World Order – soldiers from the US and other countries – to view anyone they’re told to view as the enemy, to shoot upon command without asking questions or challenging orders. Jade Helm is literally and unabashedly an exercise where US soldiers are practicing how to blend in with normal Americans and operate undetected among them. Can you see how inherently dangerous this is? Can you see how such an ability could so easily be used against the American people?

Jade Helm Implication #7: There’s Always an Enemy

From a global perspective, the US military is completely and utterly out of control. Sorry to burst your bubble if you’re an active member or a veteran, but the US military has never been about respect or honor. There’s nothing respectable about mass murder and there’s nothing honorable about constantly invading other sovereign nations because your corporate masters don’t like their leaders – as has been happening in South America, Africa, Asia, the Middle East and all over the world for over a century. When has the US military ever being used for legitimate defense? Never. It’s always been attack, attack, attack – including both World Wars and the false flag incidents (Lusitania and Pearl Harbor) engineered to get America into those bloody wars.

The problem here is the military mindset – the mindset that divides the world up into friendly and hostile, and that is always training to defend itself and attack “the enemy”, even though that enemy is frequently imaginary. Just look at how many enemies our leaders have given us, from the Nazis to the Commies to the Islamic terrorists, when in all cases those enemies were created and funded by the US military-industrial complex and the NWO elite. Jade Helm is a continuation of the demented and delusional mindset that seeks to find an enemy to fight in any situation.

Jade Helm Implication #8: Unbridled Movement of Military Vehicles

Citizen journalists have caught copious video footage of military vehicle movements around America in the last few months. Is it just a coincidence that some of this is happening in Jade Helm states, such as California, Nevada and Texas?

Jade Helm Implication #9: Connection to Closed Walmarts

The mystery of the abrupt closings of 5 Walmarts in Jade Helm states has not been solved, but many have theorized that it is connected to Jade Helm. Is Walmart, which is already enmeshed with the Federal Government and DHS, linking itself to underground tunnels? Is Walmart setting itself up to become a military command center? If not, then why is military equipment being parked in Walmart parking lots all over America?

Jade Helm Implication #10: Background and Context

No doubt, some of the speculation surrounding Jade Helm is over-the-top “fear porn”. However, even though some people love to jump to conjuring up doomsday scenarios, there is an undeniably valid cause for concern about the existence of an operation like Jade Helm. Think of the background and context in which it is occurring – including but not limited to such events as:

– incidences in the last 3-4 years on American streets of martial law (Boston Marathon) or heavy-handed military-police response (Ferguson, Baltimore);

– Obama signing the NDAA into law, which allows the US Government to indefinitely detain US citizens without charge or trial, in gross violation of the 4th Amendment;

– Obama announcing that “We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we’ve set. We’ve got to have a civilian national security force that’s just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded”;

– the invention of terrorism as the abstract bogeyman after 9/11, and the wholesale destruction of rights, liberties and privacy that has ensued in many nations across the globe since then;

– the expansion of the definition of terrorism to domestic terrorism, and the subsequent branding of ordinary Americans as extremists or domestic terrorists (e.g. the Ohio National Guard portraying gun rights supporters as domestic terrorists during a drill, the police chief in Concord, New Hampshire wanting to use a tank against occupiers and libertariansmarines in Arizona practicing to subdue citizens inside an internment camp, and American protesters being referred to as “enemy forces” and “adversaries” in National Guard documents);

– the rumors of Obama firing generals and other top military officials based on whether they would fire on American citizens (e.g. testimony of former Navy Seal Ben Smith, who claimed top brass in the military were being asked if they would be comfortable disarming US citizens);

– the US military’s own documents showing it is preparing to intervene and deploy domestically against its own citizens, whom it swore to serve and protect (e.g. the military document entitled Internment and Resettlement Operations);

– the DHS (Department of Homeland Security) purchase of 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition when the agency does not fight any wars abroad, meaning the ammunition must be used domestically;

– the testimony of various military officers, active and retired, who have revealed that the DHS is attempting to build a domestic army (e.g. this Marine Colonel).

Use Jade Helm as a Wake-Up Call

Hopefully a critical mass of awakened Americans can use Jade Helm as a wake-up call. The deeper implications reveal a great cause for concern. As always, the people have the power. If enough people take interest and oppose this operation, it may have to cancelled, or its effect will at least be nullified.

Sources:

https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/media/news/2008/10/23/5081/think-again-the-invisible-battle-over-posse-comitatus/

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-06-16/gold-bullion-worth-1-billion-be-“repatriated”-ny-fed-new-texas-bullion-depository

http://www.propublica.org/article/the-best-reporting-on-the-federal-push-to-militarize-local-police

*https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ugMmyBUKRy4

*https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hYb_TajH3FQ

*https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CzDwWpY8NMo

http://www.factcheck.org/2008/11/obamas-national-security-force/

http://rt.com/usa/ohio-nationalguard-gun-drill-590/

http://thefederalist-gary.blogspot.com/2013/08/nh-city-wants-tank-to-use-against.html

http://12160.info/profiles/blogs/video-marines-practice-subduing-citizens-inside-internment-camp

http://www.infowars.com/documents-national-guard-ordered-to-consider-americans-as-enemy-forces-and-adversaries

http://www.infowars.com/ex-navy-seal-military-leaders-being-asked-if-they-will-disarm-americans

https://info.publicintelligence.net/USArmy-InternmentResettlement.pdf

*https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sEGUlK81yMg


Makia Freeman is the editor of The Freedom Articles and senior researcher at ToolsForFreedom.com, writing on many aspects of the global conspiracy, from vaccines to Zionism to false flag operations and more, and also including info on natural health, sovereignty and higher consciousness.

Judge Finds Cause For Murder Charge In Police Killing Of 12 Year Old Tamir Rice

tamir-rice

Prosecutor brushes aside recommendation from Ohio judge to charge Cleveland police officer with murder and vows to proceed as planned with grand jury.

A judge in Ohio said on Thursday he had found probable cause to charge a police officer with murder for the fatal shooting of 12-year-old Tamir Rice last year.

Judge Ronald Adrine of the Cleveland municipal court said there were grounds to prosecute officer Timothy Loehmann with murder, manslaughter, reckless homicide and negligent homicide.

Adrine also found there was probable cause for a charge of negligent homicide against officer Frank Garmback, Loehmann’s partner, who was present when Tamir was shot at a park on 22 November while holding a pellet gun.

The judge’s recommendation, however, was brushed aside by Timothy McGinty, the Cuyahoga County prosecutor, who pledged to proceed as planned with having a grand jury decide on whether the officers should be charged.

“This case, as with all other fatal use of deadly force cases involving law enforcement officers, will go to the grand jury,” McGinty said in a statement. “That has been the policy of this office since I was elected. Ultimately, the grand jury decides whether police officers are charged or not charged.”

In a 10-page order, Judge Adrine wrote that after viewing surveillance video, which shows Tamir being shot dead within two seconds of Loehmann’s arrival, he was “still thunderstruck by how quickly this event turned deadly”.

The judge said Tamir was given “little if any time” to respond to any commands from the officers, that his arms were not raised, and that he made no “furtive movement”. Adrine wrote: “Literally, the entire encounter is over in an instant.”

Continue reading at The Guardian.

Gangs-In-Blue Strike Again (VIDEOS)

Screen-Shot-2015-06-08-at-8_15_53-AM-720x340

By: Rory Hall | The Daily Coin

Editors Note – The feature image is slightly blurry due to being a screen shot from the “pool party” video and is live action.

When I wrote They Don’t Want You to Know – The Counted I detailed the killing of American citizens by American cops. As my friend and colleague, Dave Kranzler, pointed out “to use the word “cop” instead of police officer shows the right amount of disdain for these people.” The current police state in this country is growing more out-of-control, seemingly, on a daily basis. In another example of how these once respected members of our community have become nothing more than gangs-in-blue comes from a pool party attended by teenagers. I would like to say this is a prank, however, as you will see this is a very real situation and it is amazing no one was seriously hurt or shot dead.

The good news is, that people are beginning to awaken to this ongoing, every growing nightmare created by the elitist and the banking class. My tin-foil-hat is not on too tight this morning, it is well documented that the Pentagon has been equipping local cops around the country with military weapons and all manner of war equipment. The training the gangs-in-blue have been receiving must be a direct reflection of what we are seeing on the streets. As more and more people awaken to the reality of this situation my goal is continually fuel the fire of the awakening process. As the local cops are shown to be nothing more than gangs, equipped with weapons of war, we have an opportunity to remind people of how out-of-control the mainstream media has become. Remember the bold-faced lies from Brian Williams? How many times have you seen on late night talk shows “mockingbird media” skits where they splice together a news story that appears to be “original” but is in fact nothing more than a made-for-tv event that is repeated, in most cases verbatim, around the country? I know you have seen this before.

Here is one example:

How is that possible? It is only possible due to the fact that mainstream TV is owned by only six (6) companies–all mainstream TV is owned by six (6) companies!! Think about that for a minute.

In praise of the tracking devices that happen to make phone calls, (“Smart phones”) people now have the ability to video tape situations live as they are happening. In some cases, as CopBlock has shown, you can, not only video tape an event but you can instantaneously upload it to the web via a secure connection. By uploading the event instantaneously the video tape can then be viewed and downloaded to another website thereby, protecting the video from being scrubbed from the web. In a flash an event can be video taped, uploaded and stored on a minimum of three different devices at the exact same moment the event is unfolding. By utilizing this type of service we, the American populace, can protect ourselves from these maniacs that kill our family pets on a regular basis, flash bomb our children while our child is in a crib and, now, routinely beat and kill people in broad daylight. Who’s the Real Killer?

Thank you to everyone who has the courage to video tape these criminals in act of committing violent crimes against the people they are supposedly “protecting and serving”. This most recent event solidifies these criminals are not interested in protecting and serving the citizens, only their masters, the ruling class and banking elite. Otherwise, the children in the video would not have experienced weapons being drawn against them because the children crashed a pool party.

Don’t forget to follow The Daily Coin on Twitter and like us on Facebook.

Rory Hall has been a daily contributor at SGTReport.com. for more than two years. He has written several original articles and interviewed some of the top precious metals professionals in the industry, as well as top preparedness specialists in the world. His YouTube Channel, The Daily Coin, was launched in February 2014 and his website TheDailyCoin.org was launched April 25, 2014. QUOTE: “As a student of monetary, financial and economic history for the past five years it has taught me to watch the markets with an open mind and a hand on my wallet.”

Unconstitutional Mass FBI Aerial Surveillance

 fbi surveillance plane

Free and open societies don’t spy on their citizens. They don’t invent phony threats as justification.

America is a belligerent nation waging endless wars of aggression against invented enemies. Fear-mongering is rife. It’s done to rape, ravage and destroy one country after another.

It’s a tactic used to scare people to believe they’re safer by sacrificing fundamental freedoms. Mass surveillance is a defining rogue state characteristic.

Post-9/11, government-usurped authority turned America into a police state. Big Brother watches everyone. Tuesday Senate passage of the USA Freedom Act (the renamed Patriot Act) changed little.

Government intrusion into the private lives of its citizens remains largely unchanged. The only good news is that USAF slightly rolled back its intrusiveness instead of giving spy agencies more powers.

History shows restrictions imposed are easily circumvented or ignored. A separate article discusses systematic FBI misuse of Patriot Act authority.

Bureau secrecy and cover-up make it impossible to know the full extent of its lawlessness. It operates ad libitum with minimum oversight and accountability.

One example is its mass surveillance of US citizens by drones and other aircraft. On June 2, AP reported “(s)cores of low-flying planes circling American cities…”

“They’re “part of a civilian air force operated by the FBI and obscured behind fictitious companies…”

It’s not secret. It’s been reported before. In July 2013, the agency admitted using drones for domestic surveillance numerous times without court authorized warrants or other forms of oversight.

At the time, deputy director Stephen D. Kelly said “(t)he FBI uses UAVs in very limited circumstances to conduct surveillance when there is a specific operational need.”

“Since late 2006, the FBI has conducted surveillance using UAVs in eight criminal cases and two national security cases.”

Former FBI director Robert Meuller admitted spying on US citizens with no “operational guidelines.”

Warrantless spying by any means threatens everyone. No probable cause is needed. No restraints are imposed. Constitutional protections are circumvented.

Once a program is established, it takes on a life of its own. In the last decade, FBI aerial spying expanded to “civilian air force” level.

In April alone, AP identified at least 50 FBI aircraft conducting more than 100 flights over urban and rural areas in 11 states.

It cited a 2009 budget document indicating 115 planes, including 90 Cessna aircraft.

FBI aerial spying is longstanding. Today, drones and other aircraft are equipped with high-tech cameras for close-up visual surveillance as well as technology able to monitor thousands of cell phones – a blatant breach of privacy.

According to Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Charles Grassley (R. IA):

“It’s important that federal law enforcement personnel have the tools they need to find and catch criminals.”

“But whenever an operation may also monitor the activities of Americans who are not the intended target, we must make darn sure that safeguards are in place to protect the civil liberties of innocent Americans.”

No safeguards whatever exist – nor does Congress back up high-minded rhetoric with effective policies protecting the public from abusive government practices.

Rogue agencies like the FBI, NSA, CIA, DEA and Homeland Security operate by their own rules – easily circumventing weak and ineffective restraints on their authority.

Congressional inaction effectively rubber-stamps them. It permits unaccountable police state practices no free society would tolerate.

AP learned the FBI uses at least 13 fake companies to conceal its activities – including FVX Research, KQM Aviation, NBR Aviation and PXW Services.

ACLU policy analyst Jay Stanley called its flights significant if they’re “maintaining a fleet of aircraft whose purpose is to circle over American cities, especially with” today’s sophisticated surveillance technology.

Details the FBI confirmed concur with published reports since at least 2003 about suspicious-looking planes overflying US cities being government ones.

The Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) and US Marshals Service have their own aerial surveillance programs using sophisticated technology, much like the FBI’s.

Basic information about these programs are secret. Heavily redacted Justice Department Inspector General documents alone inadequately explain what the public has a right to know.

They’re spied on – by the FBI, NSA, CIA, DEA, Homeland Security and other rogue government agencies, especially post-9/11.

Spies “R” us defines US policy. America is a total surveillance society unfit to live in. Big Brother watches everyone intrusively – in blatant breach of fundamental constitutional protections.

Fabricated national security threats justify the unjustifiable. The so-called “war on terror” is phony. The war OF terror by Washington on its citizens is real.

Unconstitutional spying today in America is pervasive. It’s institutionalized. Privacy rights no longer matter. Fundamental freedoms are being trampled. They’re disappearing in plain sight.


Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at [email protected]. His new book is titled “How Wall Street Fleeces America: Privatized Banking, Government Collusion and Class War”. www.claritypress.com/Lendman.html Visit his blog site at www.sjlendman.blogspot.com.

 

Revisiting Patriot Act Police State Legislation

 

WASHINGTON - MARCH 09:  Surrounded by members of Congress and Cabinet members U.S. President George W. Bush signs the H.R. 3199, USA PATRIOT and Terrorism Prevention Reauthorization Act of 2005 in the East Room at the White House March 8, 2006 in Washington DC. The reauthorization of the Patriot Act had come under criticism from some in Congress for the potential to infringe of civil liberties but was pushed by the Bush administration as essential for fighting terrorism.  (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images)

Surrounded by members of Congress and Cabinet members U.S. President George W. Bush signs the H.R. 3199, USA PATRIOT and Terrorism Prevention Reauthorization Act of 2005 in the East Room at the White House March 8, 2006 in Washington DC. (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images)

Free and open societies don’t enact police state laws like the USA Patriot Act – ever for any reason.

Lawyer Nancy Chang said earlier “(t)here’s nothing patriotic about trampling on the Bill of Rights.”

The legislation was written, on the shelf, ready to go long before 9/11 – awaiting an excuse to introduce and enact what no free society would tolerate.

Washington capitalized on a window of hysteria to grant unchecked executive powers. The legislation was congressionally passed and signed by George Bush on October 26, 2001 – 45 days after 9/11.

It state sponsored terror committed by the government of the United States against its own people. The mother of all Big Lies claims otherwise.

The Patriot Act’s text was 342 pages long. It controversially changed 15 US laws. It created the crime of domestic terrorism for the first time – defined as “acts dangerous to human life…that appear to be intended:

(i) to intimidate or coerce a civilian population;

(ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion; or

(iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination, or kidnapping…”

In other words, anti-war or global justice demonstrations, environmental or animal rights activism, civil disobedience, and dissent of any kind may be called “domestic terrorism.”

The Patriot Act circumvented or seriously eroded key Bill of Rights protections – not for security, for police state empowerment. Affected are:

Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment due process rights – initially permitting indefinite detentions of undocumented immigrants, now leaving anyone anywhere in the world, including US citizens, vulnerable for any reason or none at all.

First Amendment freedom of association rights – an essential part of free expression. Now anyone may be charged and prosecuted for their alleged association with an “undesirable group.”

Fourth Amendment protections from unreasonable searches and seizures. Personal privacy rights were lost.

Authorized unchecked government surveillance powers to access personal records, monitor financial transactions, as well as student, medical and other records.

Mass monitoring became standard practice. Expiration of three controversial provisions discussed in a separate article changed little.

Big Brother’s intrusive power was barely touched, and expired provisions may be reinstated in new form – either in the USA Freedom Act introduced or other legislation later on.

USAF only modestly rolls back the intelligence community’s “collect it all” strategy – likely not enough to matter given how the NSA, FBI, CIA and other US agencies routinely operate, circumventing restraints put on them unaccountably.

Patriot Act Section 806 lets authorities confiscate or freeze all foreign and domestic assets of any individual, entity, or organization accused of engaging in, planning, supporting, concealing, or perpetrating any act called domestic or international terrorism against America – true or false, with no hearing, notice or justice.

Vague language in other provisions give authorities wide latitude to twist the law perversely and advantageously, targeting anyone for anything called terrorism, whether justified or not.

Key Patriot Act powers were extended in March 2006 and May 2011 – likely again this year in USA Freedom Act form as debate in the Senate heads toward perhaps resolution on Tuesday.

The measure passed the House earlier. If the Senate version differs, reconciliation between both will follow.

Democracy in America is pure fantasy. Illusion substitutes for reality.

Police state ruthlessness is the law of the land. Patriot Act repression is Exhibit A.


Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at [email protected]. His new book is titled “How Wall Street Fleeces America: Privatized Banking, Government Collusion and Class War”. www.claritypress.com/Lendman.html Visit his blog site at www.sjlendman.blogspot.com.

Are UK Police Now Behaving Like Intelligence Agencies? (VIDEO)

City_of_London_Police_Van

The overreaching surveillance state in the U.S. certainly takes most of the headlines, but the UK is every bit on par if not worse.  A recent report, responded to below by Steve Jolly of NOCCTV, indicates that there have been 700,000 police requests to access private communications in the UK over a two-year period – which amounts to a request every 2 minutes.  And these requests are almost never denied; in fact, they have a 96% approval rate. This surely can’t purely be to “thwart terrorism.”


RT

Visit http://www.no-cctv.org.uk/

They Don’t Want You To Know – The Counted

Screen-Shot-2015-06-05-at-7_12_30-AM-720x340

Please raise your hand if you are sick and tired of the United States “leadership”.

It appears that, once again, the people that are supposedly in charge of tracking much needed information regarding something as important as how many people are killed by the police in this country each year are too $#@% busy tracking information that benefits the elitist scum so they can further enslave us. We have to turn to people like Brian Burkhardt at Fatal Encounters, the fine folks at killedbypolice.net and now enter a foreign newspaper who sees this tragic ongoing nightmare as being so important they, too, have put together a database in order to reveal how many U.S. citizens are killed by police in the United States each year. The numbers, once again, are very disturbing and you will see the real problem are the gangs in blue. One of the more revealing statistics is not police killing blacks, but police killing whites. The statistics do not lie as they are coming from sources other than the government who are known liars. The government could have just as easily compiled this information but they do not want YOU to have this information as not to make people upset and begin demanding serious changes. Please spread this information as far and wide as possible. Even someone who is sound asleep can relate to this and should be warned about the real possibility of being gunned down by a criminal in a blue uniform.

(click image to enlarge)

Screen-Shot-2015-06-05-at-7_38_06-AM

The FBI has a voluntary program for each police department to report these statistics; voluntary. By the FBI’s own admission about half the police departments do any type of reporting. Why is this vital information voluntary? Once again, because they don’t want you to know.

This issue bothers me more than any other issue that is covered here The Daily Coin. The government steals from us, lies to us and, for no apparent reason, they send our children to kill and be killed in foreign lands. These issues are tragic and are very telling about how far our once proud nation has fallen. But, this issue where murder is legal, as long as you are wearing the proper shirt and pants, is beyond what I can take. I am very grateful for all the people that are dedicating the time and resources to deliver this information to our society. There will be a permanent link to each of the websites listed above, along with a permanent link to Officer Down Memorial Page so that everyone has the opportunity to see for themselves who the real killer is in your neighborhood. If you think the thugs on the corner are the problem I challenge you to take a serious look at this information. These criminals are killing your children and getting away with murder—3 plus times a day, everyday. What are you going to do about it? Would you please consider passing this along to your local, very local, “representatives” as to put the criminals in charge on notice. We are awake and we are organizing.

Once again, a foreign source is bringing to light something our government should be providing and want to provide to the citizens of the United States to be able to actually serve and protect. You know, what local cops are suppose to do. But, as we are finding out, that is not the goal. The goal is to protect and serve the ruling class and banking elite. They better hope the QE money never stops flowing because if it does, these criminals will be fully exposed and I fear something very dramatic will take place.

Please do not take my word for it, take a look for yourself. Review the sites listed above and do the simple math that is needed to understand the people in blue are the ones committing most of the murders in this country.

The Counted

Don’t forget to follow The Daily Coin on Twitter and like us on Facebook.


Rory Hall has been a daily contributor at SGTReport.com. for more than two years. He has written several original articles and interviewed some of the top precious metals professionals in the industry, as well as top preparedness specialists in the world. His YouTube Channel, The Daily Coin, was launched in February 2014 and his website TheDailyCoin.org was launched April 25, 2014. QUOTE: “As a student of monetary, financial and economic history for the past five years it has taught me to watch the markets with an open mind and a hand on my wallet.”

Police State America’s National Railroad Police

CSXT Police
By: MassPrivateI |

Privately run ‘secret’ railroad police have trained 85 SWAT teams in 13 states!

Private railroad police officers licensed in every state, have been accused of physical assaults, racial profiling and harassment according to lawsuits, interviews and court records. The records and interviews show that there have been numerous complaints and dozens of lawsuits filed against railroad police officers in recent years.

“Most states have a statute that authorizes railroad corporations to hire and appoint railroad police officers. Generally, these laws are found in the railroad or public utility sections of a state’s consolidated statutes. A railroad police commission is issued by a specific state agency, usually from the state police but sometimes from the governor’s office. The remaining state code sections regarding railroad police often require the employing corporations to bear all liability; the officers to take an oath and wear a badge indicating that they serve as railroad police officers for a specific railroad corporation; and local police agencies to accept persons arrested by railroad police.

“If the requirement to accept prisoners is not explicitly stated in the railroad police statute, the police powers conferred upon sworn and commissioned railroad police officers in the enabling law will convey that they possess the same legal authority as state and local police or peace officers.”

“As such, their legal authority includes the typical police powers to arrest persons for state law felonies, misdemeanors, or violations and process them into the local criminal justice system. In many states, rail and transit police agencies are included in criminal justice system processes and have access to state criminal record systems for investigative and arrest-processing purposes.”

Private rail lines CSXT, BNSF, KCS, UPand others maintain their own private police. The Amtrak Police is the largest with more than 450 sworn officers who undergo training at FLETC. They are armed with Glock 22 .40-caliber pistols and no less than 100 5.56mm Bushmaster Patrolman’s carbines.
 
Since 2009 private railroad police have arrested more than 300 residents in Overtown, a predominantly black neighborhood in Miami, on charges of trespassing. Nearly 90 percent of those charges have been dismissed. Click here & here to read more.
 
In Oklahoma in 2010, a Union Pacific railroad police officer was captured on video choking a woman he accused of trespassing and resisting arrest. A local court dropped the charges against the woman and she settled a lawsuit with the company earlier this year.

Union Pacific Railroad is working with police across the country ticketing motorists at railroad crossings. It ‘s called “Operation UPCares” here’s a list of a few states Texas, New York, Missouri that are letting private police ticket motorists.

“UP Railroad Police were stopping motorists that crossed the tracks when the lights were red and the barriers down, giving offenders warnings and tickets.”

They’re even using “UPCares” to warn people about taking photographs of trains!

“We urge professional and amateur photographers alike to set the right example for others by adhering to the safety guidelines.”

 
 
Federal authorities have ceded oversight of railroad police to the states but few states, if any, keep data of complaints against railroad police.
 
People who say they have been mistreated by the railroad police have little recourse except to complain to the railroads, but because the railroads are private companies, they can operate largely in ‘SECRET’.

It’s hard to put a precise number on America’s private police but it would be fair to say that there’s over 1.5 MILLION and growing.

America has almost ONE MILLION police officers, this doesn’t include private police or security guards, which is larger than the 1.5 MILLION by most estimates. Private security guards have outnumbered police officers since the 1980s. The more than 1 million contract security officers, and guards work directly for U.S. corporations.

That means there’s over 2.5 MILLION POLICE in the US with no signs of stopping!

There needs to be better oversight of these corporate police forces, because right now it is sorely lacking,” said Lloyd C. Larsen, a Republican state representative in Wyoming, one of only two states that do not allow the railroad police to have law enforcement authority; Minnesota is the other. “No one knows what they do or how they operate outside of people at the company.”

The average salary for Railroad Police in 2010 was $58,560 nationally, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.  The top ten percent earned salaries of $86,630 or higher.  Among the highest paying industries were

  • State government – $70,570
  • Rail transportation – $60,980
  • Local government – $56,760

Railroad police can pursue people anywhere, they’re not restricted to company property.  Railroad officers possess the broad powers and jurisdiction of local or state police.

“Some states require that railroad police officers obtain commissions as other local and state officers do, while other states may only require certifications similar to a security guard.  As a result of the Crime Control Act, commissioned railroad police officers with arrest or other powers in one state may also carry those powers to any other state in which their railway employer operates.”

The Omnibus Crime Control Act of 1990, Public Law 101-647, which gave all U.S. railroad police this additional statutory authority to perform more efficient and effective law enforcement functions. Presently, it is codified at 49 U.S.C. 28101 and states as follows:

28101. Rail Police Officers
Under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Transportation, a rail police officer who is employed by a rail carrier and certified or commissioned as a police officer under the laws of a State may enforce the laws of any jurisdiction in which the rail carrier owns property, to the extent of the authority of a police officer certified or commissioned under the laws of that jurisdiction, to protect—
(1) employees, passengers, or patrons of the rail carrier;
(2) property, equipment, and facilities owned, leased, operated, or maintained by the rail carrier;
(3) property moving in interstate or foreign commerce in the possession of the rail carrier; and
(4) personnel, equipment, and material moving by rail that are vital to the national defense.

The only jurisdictional exception existing prior to the enactment of this law was the railroad police of the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak). Created by Congress, Amtrak’s enabling legislation under the Rail Passenger Service Act of 1970, now codified starting at 49 U.S.C. 24101, established the authority for Amtrak to have railroad police. The statutory authority was unique at the time and included interstate police powers.

The Amtrak rail police law, now found at 49 U.S.C. 24305 (e), states as follows: (e) Rail Police. —Amtrak may employ rail police to provide security for rail passengers and property of Amtrak. Rail police employed by Amtrak who have complied with a State law establishing requirements applicable to rail police or individuals employed in a similar position may be employed without regard to the law of another State containing those requirements.

Federal regulations promulgated under 49 U.S.C. 28101 are contained starting at 49 CFR 207 and apply to all railroad police, including those of Amtrak. These regulations describe in more detail the scope of this broader-ranging interstate authority.

When railroad police officers are in a state different from the one where they received their railroad police commissions, their police authority is the same as that of railroad officers commissioned under the laws of the state in which they are present. Furthermore, this police authority shall apply only on railroad property, except in two instances:

  • A railroad police officer may pursue someone off railroad property if that person is suspected of violating the law on railroad property.
  •  A railroad police officer may engage in off–railroad property law enforcement activities, including, without limitation, investigation and arrest, if permissible under state law.

Railroads even have a police chief, special agents and rapid response teams or ‘counterterrorism unit. Click here, here and here to read about CSXT’s police department.

CSXT Rapid Response

CSXT has also developed a special weapons and tactics (SWAT)–like three-day Tactical Rail Interdiction training course, offered to law enforcement officers at no cost.

Why is it being offered to police at no cost and are they qualified to train SWAT teams etc.?

“Once we do a background check, we pass the information on to the governor’s office which approves or denies the applicant,” said Terry Baker, training and research manager at the Florida Department of Law Enforcement. “That’s the full extent of our dealings with railroad police.”

There’s the smoking gun!

America’s SWAT teams and police are being trained by privately run police who’s only requirement is to pass a background check! What kind of psychopath’s are training police officers and SWAT teams across America?

It’s unknown if railroad police officers receive any psychological testing. At least DHS run police departments force new cops to undergo some psychological testing, see below:

“Right now we give cops a test called the MMPI-2, the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. So we pretty much determine that they’re not psychopaths. I think that’s a low bar.” Former Police Chief  John DeCarlo said.

To find out more, read “Former Police Chief Says Police Should Stop Hiring Bullies”.

The ”SECRET’ is out; EVERY rail company is working with DHS and they’re training SWAT teams for free!

They [railroad police] even have ‘Council Charter Homeland Security Memberships’, click herehere and here to read more.

CSXT has trained 85 SWAT teams in 13 states:

 
For more info. about America’s national train police read:
 
Article republished from MassPrivateI 

Brian Burkhardt: Cops Kill Someone Every 7.5 Hours In This Country (VIDEO)

Image: 11 Shot, Two Killed, In Shooting By NYC's Empire State Building

I asked the FBI for the addresses for all the State and Local law enforcement agencies that contribute to the Uniform Crime Report and instead of just answering my request they lied to me a bunch of times.– D. Brian Burkhardt, Shadow of Truth

The incidents to Ferguson, Missouri and Baltimore, Maryland have significantly elevated the awareness of police brutality in the United States. We should be especially concerned about unchecked police violence inflicted on citizens now that nationwide the local police departments are being converted into quasi-military forces. Many of these police departments are better armed with sophisticated military equipment than some entire countries. Miranda Rights per the Constitution seem to have been discarded along with each of the other Bill of Rights (1st ten Constitutional Amendments)

The nation’s leading law enforcement agency [FBI] collects vast amounts of information on crime nationwide, but missing from this clearinghouse are statistics on where, how often, and under what circumstances police use deadly force. In fact, no one anywhere comprehensively tracks the most significant act police can do in the line of duty: take a life. – Brian Burkhardt, FatalEncounters.com

Brian is the editor of the Reno News & Review and decided to assemble a comprehensive national database of people who are killed through interactions with police started with a simple question: “How often does that happen?” As it turns out, what he thought was 2-3 police-related murders per day, in some cases, is as high as 5-6. The national average now is roughly one person killed by cop every 7.5 hours.

Furthermore, the racial bias is not clear. The deadliest jurisdictions in this order are: 1) New Mexico 2) Washington DC 3) Arizona 4) Nevada 5) Oklahoma.

You can hear about Brian’s project and the stonewalling he’s encountered in attempting to assemble a comprehensive database of cop-related killings in this country:

Freedom of Information Act (FOIA): Request Denied

While it’s very refreshing to hear from someone who is energetically trying to make a positive difference in our system by trying to get the truth out about police brutality – specifically cop-related murders. However, after a decade and a half of observing, research and living in a country in which the Government has become increasingly less willing to let the public see what is going on; one in which the political system is sliding into compelete totalitarian control, both Rory and I have a fundamental disagreement with Brian’s assessment about whether or not the Government, FBI and local police departments are withholding cop-killing information from the public.

Brian’s altruism and his default position of giving the Government the benefit of the doubt is quite admirable. However, by Brian’s own admission, the exceptions of the Freedom of Information Act essentially give the Government the ability to deny any information request. If you read through the exeptions as listed on Brian’s website, you’ll see that the exceptions synthesize down to a boilerplate rubber stamp “Request Denied.”

Essentially if the Goverment decides they don’t want to honor your FOIA, they’re not going to – Shadow of Truth


Rory Hall has been a daily contributor at SGTReport.com. for more than two years. He has written several original articles and interviewed some of the top precious metals professionals in the industry, as well as top preparedness specialists in the world. His YouTube Channel, The Daily Coin, was launched in February 2014 and his website TheDailyCoin.org was launched April 25, 2014. QUOTE: “As a student of monetary, financial and economic history for the past five years it has taught me to watch the markets with an open mind and a hand on my wallet.”

NYPD Wants To Hire 450 Cops To Fight ISIS

NYPD Wants To Hire 450 Cops To Fight ISIS
By: Joshua Krause | The Daily Sheeple

The ISIS bogeyman strikes again. New York Police Chief Bill Bratton announced that he is seeking approval to hire an additional 450 police officers to counter the threat of ISIS. With the average annual salary of a new police officer at over $44,000, this would cost the city roughly $20,000,000 per year; and all for an organization that has never attacked the city. The officers would be working with the NYPD’s counter-terrorism unit, which is also responsible for monitoring protests throughout the city.

Despite his claims that “We are entering a new era where we cannot live in fear, but we have to live increasingly aware of our surroundings” his suggestion sounds an awful lot like it’s based on fear, rather than sound reasoning. The average American is much more likely to die from something mundane like food poisoning or slipping in the bathtub, than they are from terrorism. But Bill Bratton still thinks that we need to spend millions of dollars on armed bureaucrats.

Furthermore, I don’t think anybody really believes that more cops will actually prevent terrorism. In most cases, terrorist plots are either provocateured by intelligence and law enforcement agencies, or are foiled by ordinary citizens. New York’s City Hall is also unimpressed by the scaremongering, and previously snubbed the City Council’s request for an additional 1,000 police officers.


Article first published at The Daily Sheeple.

Joshua Krause is a reporter, writer and researcher at The Daily Sheeple. He was born and raised in the Bay Area and is a freelance writer and author. You can follow Joshua’s reports at Facebook or on his personal Twitter. Joshua’s website is Strange Danger.

Police Have Officially Killed 400 People In 2015, A New Grieving Family Every Seven And A Half Hours

police-kill-us-citizens-every-7.5-hours
By: Cassandra Fairbanks | The Free Thought Project –

As of May 5, 2015, the police in the United States of America have killed 401 people that we know of.

Deaths By Law Enforcement 2015:

  • 91 in the 31 days of January
  • 85 in the 28 days of February
  • 115 in the 31 days of March
  • 101 in the 30 days of April
  • 8 people in the 5 days of May

Extrapolating those numbers out to an hourly figure and the police have killed someone, on average, every 7.48 hours. While there is no government-run database, Killed By Police has taken it upon themselves to keep track, and are doing a fantastic job thus far. It’s truly a Cop Crisis.

The three youngest are A’donte Washington, Jason C. Hendrix, and Kendre Omari Alston, who were all only 16-years-old. The oldest was 87-year-old Lewis Becker. At least four officers have also been shot and killed by other officers.

Meanwhile, the Officer Down Memorial Page is reporting gunfire related deaths of on-duty officers is down 43%.

Law Enforcement Deaths 2015:

  • 9/11 related illness: 2
  • Accidental: 1
  • Assault: 1
  • Automobile accident: 12
  • Gunfire: 8
  • Gunfire (Accidental): 2
  • Heart attack: 10
  • Motorcycle accident: 1
  • Struck by vehicle: 2
  • Vehicle pursuit: 2

The death by assault was Patrolman George Nissen, and they are referring to injuries sustained 10 years earlier when he was attempting to break up a large fight on February 13th, 2005.

A look at the two which were struck by vehicles, both were accidents, with one occurring while the officer was off duty and had stopped to help someone on an icy road. The other was an accident where a semi truck crashed into the officer’s vehicle.

That leaves the eight by gunfire as deaths due to suspects actively attempting to harm them this year.

Deaths of officers directly at hands of suspects this year:

  • 0 in January
  • 0 in February
  • 6 in March
  • 0 in April
  • 2 in May

This means that in the 125 days of 2015, the police have been killed after being shot by a suspect, on average, every 375 hours.

According to an FBI report, Americans are less violent than ever, yet the police seem to be growing increasingly violent. These numbers seem to agree.

Being a police officer isn’t even close to being in the top 10 most dangerous jobs in this country. According to the 2013 report by the Federal Bureau of Labor Statistics on work-related fatal injuries, “Police and sheriff’s patrol deputies” ranked as the 41st most dangerous occupation.

Just some numbers for you to consider next time you or someone you know tries to claim that the “brave” men and women in blue are perpetually “fearing for their life” so that they “can get home to their families.”

Every seven and a half hours our police leave another family planning a funeral. Enough is enough; visit our #solutions section if you’d like to find out some of the many ways we can change this paradigm.


Contributed by Cassandra Fairbanks of The Free Thought Project.

Popular Culture Promotes The Police State

“The State has but one face for me: that of the police. To my eyes, all of the State’s ministries have this single face, and I cannot imagine the ministry of culture other than as the police of culture, with its prefect and commissioners.”  –  Jean Dubuffet

The New World Order, designed around a functional police state that is encouraged by continuous popular cultural messages, is apparent to even the most avid establishment apologist. Liberty and freedom, hardly ever mentioned in a positive light by the mass media, is a direct threat to the ruling class. The proliferation of degenerate behavior is lauded so that those who object to such conduct will be demeaned as outcasts of the decadent society. The imposition of a police state is necessary to coerce decent people into forced obedience.

Cultural celebrities and icons come and go, but their art often rings on for good or bad. Political propaganda, embedded in media projects, has transcended subliminal messages and now emphasizes in your face brashness. The breakdown of the traditional value society is so complete, that what was once viewed as insulting political disinformation now passes as a promotion for a loyalist NWO drama.

One such Showtime production is the pathetic Homeland series.

Rachel Shabi offers her review assessment in the piece; Does Homeland just wave the American flag?

“Instead, Homeland presents a retuned version of the same unshakeable assurance that, even when things are really complicated, American values are the fairest, the most right and the best. Sure, the series shows US forces doing terrible things: covering up a drone attack that kills civilians in Iraq; trigger-happy in a US mosque, leaving innocents dead there, too. But these are presented as necessary acts in pursuit of far worse crimes. Homeland’s core message is that the US means well, but sometimes has to do bad things; while the Arab and/or Muslim enemy doesn’t mean well and hence does unfathomably bad things. Not much of a progression really, is it?”

When the postmortem of the Patriotic Act era is dissected, the treason of intelligence community operations will be written in their full horror. The police state glorified in Homeland episodes is meant to prepare the public for the next stage of centralized oppression.

While cable or broadcast TV is so removed from Little House on the Prairie, today’s programming is designed to facilitate the psychological acceptance of the transition into a maximum lock down prison society.

In the essay, Mass Mind Control Through Network Television, Alex Ansary warns of the prison industrial complex.

“Turn on your local newscast. You have a few minutes of blue-collar crime, hardly any white collar crime, a few minutes of sports, misc. chit chat, random political jibber-jabber, and a look at the weather that no one is forecasting correctly. Is that what happened in your town? And we’re supposed to own the airwaves! The mainstream media openly supports the interests of the prison industrial complex. The stories focus on minority criminal groups, and exploit the real threat to appear much more dangerous than they are. Think about the growing per capita number of prisoners in the country. Then remember that this is happening at the same time that our prison boom began. The police on our streets have created criminals. The focus is to keep us in a state of fear, that way the elitists can attack any group they want to without fear of consequence. This is why the media is continuing to craft the timeless art of dehumanization.”

The cutting edge of mind control has long included the use of music and lyrics that produce subconscious meanings. Now the fascist messages in street music indoctrinate not only the youth but target to reinforce the despotic aspirations of TSA flunkies.

The article, The Transhumanist and Police State Agenda in Pop Music, provides two examples of globalist messages disguised as performances by Rihanna and Beyonce.

“In hip-hop slang, the term “hard” usually refers to someone who is street-savvy, gritty, rebellious and who is decisively “not down with police”. Hard transposes this term to a military context. Her militaristic video features a gang of uniformed men dancing under the orders of “General Rihanna”. We’ve come a long way from Public Enemy’s Fight the Power…it is now Submit to the Power. All of this military/dictatorial imagery is mixed with Rihanna’s sexy moves and outfits, appealing to the masses’ basest instinct: sex.”


“Beyonce walks on stage with a bunch of men dressed in riot gear… the type of unit a police state would use to repress opposition during popular turmoil. What are they doing in Beyonce’s performance? Contributing to permeate popular culture with police-state imagery.”

In the follow-up account, you can read the description mentioned in this report.

“Two recent examples of the perpetuation of the police state agenda in popular culture are Jay-Z and Kanye West’s music video No Church in the Wild and Adam Lambert’s Never Close our Eyes. In spite of, or perhaps because of, the fact that these songs are two different genres that aim to reach two different markets, they both contribute to the saturation of popular culture with police state imagery. While the authorities are not necessarily portrayed as the “good guys”, they are nevertheless there, as if their presence at any kind of public demonstration is normal.”

Contrast this dark brute force portrayal, with an age of optimism and hope. The peace and love themes in the music and political actions of John Lennon offer a rudimentary alternative to the grisly atrocities that the establishment commits routinely in the name of national security.

Gangster rap has little in common with All You Need is Love.

Rebellion of youth is natural, but resigned acceptance for submission to the police state is repression. The thirty-two years since his assassination has been one long road into oblivion. Read the “Interview With Investigative Reporter Jack Jones” for insights into the elimination of a dangerous messenger of peace.What a long way away from John Lennon’s lyrics in the song Revolution.

You say you’ll change the constitution

Well, you know

We all want to change your head

You tell me it’s the institution

Well, you know

You’d better free your mind instead

But if you go carrying pictures of Chairman Mao

You ain’t gonna make it with anyone anyhow

Now, transition from the mental liberation of the Beetle era, and go back and examine the overt war crimes of the premier American despot, Abraham Lincoln. Biographer and jingoism jezebel LBJ groupie, Doris Kearns Goodwin’s book, Team of Rivals: The Political Genius of Abraham Lincoln served as the backdrop of Steven Spielberg’s production of the recent released Lincoln film.

Alec Ryan writes in the American Renaissance:

“In the modern Hollywood narrative, all American history revolves around the Sacred Black Experience. Lincoln confirms this, bending historical truth to paint the most ruthless, bloody-minded, strong-willed American leader in history as some kind of smug, pre-post-modern storyteller croaking gamely through the difficulties like a paleface Obama sans teleprompter. The few Southerners are snarling, greasy bigots, recoiling before the erect, scowling black Union guards as they slink by during a meeting that led to the Hampton Roads peace conference of February 1865.

The film has throughout a sense of hushed awe, as if kowtowing to its own self-evident righteousness. There is no balance, no complexity, no sense of inner struggle or desperation. No opposing arguments. Its simplistic outlook more closely resembles the popcorn-psychology Avengers or Justice League rather than the serious historical movie that it clearly wishes to be acclaimed.”

The point of evaluating the worship adoration of the destroyer of the Republic with the authoritarianism of the newly re-elected president is to equate the despotism of both of their regimes. The imposition of the police state is part of the master plan to enslave the inherent autonomy of free citizens.

The insidious popular culture strips the institutions of traditional constitutional protections and separations of powers by diminishing the will of sovereign citizens to fight tyranny. The goal of imposing savage dehumanizing ruthlessness seeks to spread the Sons of Anarchy mindset into positions of authority. The merging of law enforcement into the ranks of criminal organizations becomes a common occurrence in the police state environment.

Once upon a time, the peace officer maintained order and balance. Now law enforcement deems that natural rights are arbitrary and conditional on obedience to government dictates.

911 provided the excuse to inflict a “War of Terror” under the disguise of national security. The Homeland program scripts that foster the ends justify the means are repugnant to every liberty advocate. Each day, the evolving police state is becoming more invasive and punitive.

A culture that glorifies jack booted thugs that order innocent citizens around as sinister terrorists destroys the essence of the nation. The New World Order essentially uses depressing indoctrination of the inevitability for submission to their mind game matrix.

The walking dead that accept a dependent society administered by bureaucratic goons, willingly tolerant a fate of bondage. Since texting is all the rage and the written language is sorely deficient, maybe the best way to communicate though the popular culture is to withdraw from the experience as much as possible. Try one on one contact; you might be surprised with the results.

“There are only two choices: A police state in which all dissent is suppressed or rigidly controlled; or a society where law is responsive to human needs. If society is to be responsive to human needs, a vast restructuring of our laws is essential.”  – William Orville Douglas


SARTRE is the pen name of James Hall, a reformed, former political operative. This pundit’s formal instruction in History, Philosophy and Political Science served as training for activism, on the staff of several politicians and in many campaigns. A believer in authentic Public Service, independent business interests were pursued in the private sector. As a small business owner and entrepreneur, several successful ventures expanded opportunities for customers and employees. Speculation in markets, and international business investments, allowed for extensive travel and a world view for commerce. He is retired and lives with his wife in a rural community. ”Populism” best describes the approach to SARTRE’s perspective on Politics. Realities, suggest that American Values can be restored with an appreciation of “Pragmatic Anarchism.” Reforms will require an Existential approach. “Ideas Move the World,” and SARTRE’S intent is to stir the conscience of those who desire to bring back a common sense, moral and traditional value culture for America. Not seeking fame nor fortune, SARTRE’s only goal is to ask the questions that few will dare … Having refused the invites of an academic career because of the hypocrisy of elite’s, the search for TRUTH is the challenge that is made to all readers. It starts within yourself and is achieved only with your sincere desire to face Reality. So who is SARTRE? He is really an ordinary man just like you, who invites you to join in on this journey. Visit his website at http://batr.org.

Montana Bill To Help Block Federal Militarization Of Police Signed Into Law

Police Shooting Missouri
By: Michael Maharrey | The Tenth Amendment Center –

A bill that would heavily diminish the effect of federal programs that militarize local police was signed into law on Thursday.

Introduced by Rep. Nicholas Schwaderer (R-Superior), House Bill 330 (HB330) bans state or local law enforcement from receiving significant classes of military equipment from the Pentagon’s “1033 Program.” It passed by a 46-1 vote in the state Senate and by a 79-20 vote in the state House. On Thursday, Gov. Steve Bullock signed it into law.

The new law will prohibit state or local law enforcement agencies from receiving drones that are armored, weaponized, or both; aircraft that are combat configured or combat coded; grenades or similar explosives and grenade launchers; silencers; and “militarized armored vehicles” from federal military surplus programs.

But, as The Guardian reported last fall, handouts of such equipment from the Pentagon are far from the only way that the federal government has been militarizing local police. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) grants used to purchase such equipment amount to three times the value of the equipment given away by the Pentagon.

HB330 closes this loophole by banning law enforcement agencies from purchasing such military equipment with federal grants. They could continue to purchase them, but would have to use state or local funds, and the agencies would have to give public notice within 14 days of a request for any such local purchase.

“This foundation sets a massive precedent in Montana and the country as to what kind of society we want to have,” Schwaderer said of his bill. “If you get to the point where you need a grenade launcher, we’ve got the National Guard.”

Last month, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie signed a bill into law that, while not as comprehensive as the Montana bill, prohibits receipt of equipment from the 1033 program without an express authorization from the local governing body. This made his state the first to take a step towards stopping the federal militarization of police.

“By making it a local decision, the New Jersey law is a great first step, but the Montana law takes things to the next level,” said Mike Maharrey of the Tenth Amendment Center. “It closes loopholes and covers almost all the bases. The next step would be to expand the equipment banned, and we’re hopeful that good people in Montana will work on that next session.”

FEDERAL SURPLUS AND GRANT MONEY

Through the federal 1033 Program, local police departments procure military grade weapons, including automatic assault rifles, body armor and mine resistant armored vehicles – essentially unarmed tanks. Police departments can even get their hands on military helicopters and other aircraft.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) runs the “Homeland Security Grant Program,” which in 2013 gave more than $900 million in counterterrorism funds to state and local police. According to a 2012 Senate report, this money has been used to purchase tactical vehicles, drones, and even tanks with little obvious benefit to public safety. And, according to ProPublica, “In 1994, the Justice Department and the Pentagon funded a five-year program to adapt military security and surveillance technology for local police departments that they would otherwise not be able to afford.”

Local agencies almost never have the funds needed to purchase this kind of equipment, and federal money is the only way they can afford it. By banning purchases with federal funding, HB330 would effectively nullify the effect of such federal “grant” programs.

COMMAND AND CONTROL

Arming ‘peace officers’ like they’re ready to occupy an enemy city is totally contrary to the society envisioned by the Founders. They’ve turned ‘protect and serve’ into ‘command and control.’

In the 1980s, the federal government began arming, funding and training local police forces, turning peace officers into soldiers to fight in its unconstitutional “War on Drugs.” The militarization went into hyper-drive after 9/11 when a second front opened up – the “War on Terror.”

By stripping state and local police of this military-grade gear and requiring them to report on their acquisition and use, it makes them less likely to cooperate with the feds and removes incentives for partnerships.

“Sunshine is the salve of good government,” Schwaderer said.

That is exactly what HB330 will start to bring to Montana.

TAKE ACTION

For other states: Take action to push back against federal militarization of your police at this link.

The Tenth Amendment Center, based in Los Angeles, seeks to limit federal power through action in the states.

If You Think Jade Helm’s Bad, Wait Till You Hear About The Presidential Police Force Established On The Heels Of Jade Helm! It’s About To Get Wild! (VIDEOS)

 police state usa

By: Lisa Haven | Lisa Haven News

On December 18, 2014, President Barack Obama secretly signed an executive order creating a Presidential Task Force geared at 21st Century Policing. This Force seeks not only to identify ways for police departments to better themselves but also promotes increased interaction of our local police officers in our schools, businesses, communities and many other aspects of our lives. The main objective of the force is to get the public acquainted with their presence and to establish a trust connection in communities.

While this all sounds like “sunshine and lollipops” we must consider this a step towards the integration of preparation for martial law. Considering this task force comes on the heels of Jade Helm—who’s object it is to gain public trust as well— we must consider the possibility. What are the chances that both Jade Helm, (a military training exercise) and the Presidential Task Force for the 21st Century (a police objective report) are geared at gaining the publics trust? Could there be a link between them and martial law preparation? Or am I thinking too much into it?

Here is the breaking report….

Oops Leaked Info You’re Not Supposed to Know: Military Plans a Martial Law Visit to Multiple US Towns! Why? The Answer Will Make You Rethink What You Thought You Already Knew

According to Jade Helm one of the main objectives for the Military is to: “…work with civilians to gain their trust and an understanding of the issues.”

According to the Presidential Task Force for the 21st Century Policing Report the main objective is to promote: “Trust between law enforcement agencies and the people they protect and serve…” It further states that “People are more likely to obey the law when they believe those who are enforcing it have the right—the legitimate authority—to tell them what to do.” (page1)

The report also exposes the goal of having local police highly involved in our communities, schools, businesses and lives on a daily basis, “The mission of the task force is to examine how to foster strong, collaborative relationships between local law enforcement and the communities they protect…” (page 1)

These similarities are striking! And while it seems like a good thing, the question needs to be asked; why is their an uptick in readying the community to trust the military through Jade Helm and the police force through the Presidential Task Force? Do they fear something is around the corner?

But that’s not all the Presidential Task Force Report Reveals. I also found these interesting facts enclosed in the document:

Pages 2 and 3 describe seven sessions conducted as a result of this task force that discuss a wide range of recommendations from faith leaders, law enforcement, academics, and more. It includes: 

  1. Building Trust and Legitimacy (gaining trust of community)
  2. Policy and Oversight (policies)
  3. Technology and Social Media (How to use technology to help police and privacy issues) 
  4. Community Policing and Crime Reduction (community policing and more trust building.) 
  5. Training and Education (Of which Jade Helm is a part of, just how to train)
  6. Officer Safety and Wellness
  7. Future of Community Policing (how to implement procedures)

Some recommendations on how to implement the above polices are as follows:

“The President create a National Crime and Justice Task Force to review and evaluate all components of the criminal justice system of rate purpose of making recommendations to the country on comprehensive criminal justice reform.” (pg. 3) It further stated the reason why was because “the justice system alone cannot solve many of the underlying conditions that give rise to crime. It will be through partnerships across sectors and at every level of government that we will find the effective and legitimate long-term solutions to ensuring public safety.” (pg. 4)

This clearly could indicate a future partnership of sorts between the local law enforcement, the federal government, and even branches of local businesses, churches, schools, etc. The problem with this is that it could turn into a mesh pot of information gathered against each individual kicking our privacy issues out the door. Further when our local police are continually interacting through “partnerships” we are likely to see an increase in police activity in our cities. Here are a few more recommendations promoting such interactions: 

Community policing should be infused throughout the culture and organizational structure of law enforcement agencies.” (pg. 43)

“Law enforcement agencies should develop programs that create opportunities for patrol officers to regularly interact with neighborhood residents, faith leaders, and business leaders.” (pg.46)

Law enforcement agencies should work with schools to develop and monitor school discipline policies with input and collaboration from school personnel, students, families, and community members. These policies should prohibit the use of corporal punishment and electronic control devices.” (pg.48-49)

“Communities and law enforcement agencies should restore and build trust between youth and police by creating programs and projects for positive, consistent, and persistent interaction between youth and police.” (pg. 50)

“The U.S. Department of Justice should explore public-private partnership opportunities, starting by convening a meeting with local, regional, and national foundations to discuss the proposals for reform described in this report and seeking their engagement and support in advancing implementation of these recommendations.” (pg. 71)

Am I reading to much into this? Or is there a link to be made? I guess the ultimate decision is yours. But either way, don’t say I didn’t warn you!

Here is the video clip of the FEMA Camp Roundup Drill in Florida (Video by NextNewsNetwork):

For More Information See:

http://www.rand.org/blog/2015/03/what-can-mounted-police-teach-us-about-police-visibility.html

http://www.rand.org/blog/2015/03/when-it-comes-to-police-community-relations-expect.html

Task Force Stream: http://www.taskforceonpolicing.us/

Task Force Document: http://www.cops.usdoj.gov/pdf/taskforce/Interim_TF_Report.pdf

Jade Helm:  http://american3rdposition.com/wp-content/uploads/Jade-Helm-Martial-Law-WW3-Prep-Document-1.pdf

1033 Program Through NDAA:  http://fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R43701.pdf

Executive Order: http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=108088

Article republished with permission from Lisa Haven News

Want To Record The Cops? Know Your Rights

record the cops

By: Nadia Kayyali | Electronic Frontier Foundation

There are some very disturbing videos circulating the Internet right now, depicting the deaths of unarmed civilians at the hands of trained, armed men. Many of these videos even show individuals being shot in the back, or as they try to flee.

These are videos of police officers in America killing unarmed black men like Oscar Grant and Eric Garner. And, as the most recent case shows, without these recordings, much of America might not have any idea exactly how much of a problem this is.

Citizen videos of law enforcement encounters are more valuable than ever. And for those who are wondering—it is legal to record the police.

The police don’t always seem aware of this. There have been incidents across the country of police telling people to stop filming, and sometimes seizing their camera or smartphone, or even arresting them, when they don’t comply.

In the most recent citizen-filmed incident to gain widespread media attention, on April 4, white police officer Michael Slager shot and killed 50-year-old black man Walter Scott in the back as he ran away in North Charleston, South Carolina. Bystander Feiden Santana filmed the encounter, which started with a traffic stop. After Santana’s video surfaced, the officer was arrested and charged with murder. Santana said that he is scared of what might happen to him. He also considered deleting the video, and doing nothing with it. And Santana is not the only person who may be intimidated by the prospect of filming the police, with good reason.

That’s why, in addition to EFF Attorney Sophia Cope’s legal analysis highlighting some of the recent case law establishing the right to film police officers, we’re sharing some basic information cop watchers should know.

What Courts Have Said

Courts across the country have held that there is a First Amendment right to openly record the police. Courts have also held, however, that individuals cannot interfere with police operations, and that wiretapping statutes that prohibit secretly recording may apply to recording the police. But underlying these decisions is the understanding that recording the police is constitutionally protected.

Know Your Rights and Be Safe

While it has been established that individuals have the right to record the police, what happens on the street frequently does not match the law. Also, if you’re thinking about filming the police, it’s likely you’ll have more police encounters than you otherwise would.

The National Lawyers Guild (NLG) is a bar association that does police accountability work. The National Lawyers Guild Legal Observer program is focused on watching the police at protests. CopBlock and Cop Watch are loosely organized groups that have chapters across the country, and provide resources on filming the police everyday.

Here are the most essential things to keep in mind:

  • Stay calm and courteous, even though the situation may be stressful. Remember—if you get arrested or get into an altercation with the police, you won’t be able to keep filming them!
  • Be sure that you are not interfering with police operations, and stand at a safe distance from any encounter you film.
  • Your right to record audio surreptitiously of police carrying out their duties in public may vary from state to state. You should check your state law to know the fullest extent of your rights, but the lowest risk way to record is to hold your device in plain view of the officers.
  • Do not lie to police officers. If they ask whether you are recording, answer honestly.
  • If the police start interacting with you, treat the encounter as you would any encounter with law enforcement—in fact, you may want to be extra careful, since as the repeated incidents of police seizing cameras and smartphones demonstrate, it may make you more of a target.
  • If you are at a demonstration, police will often issue a dispersal order—in general, they will declare a protest an unlawful assembly and tell people to leave. Unless you are granted permission to stay, that order applies to you, too. If you do not comply, you should expect to be arrested.
  • While it is not legal for an officer to order you to move because you are recording, they may still order you to move. If you do not comply you could be arrested. If you do want to comply, consider complying with the smallest movement possible, and verbally confirming that you are complying with their orders. For example, if you are standing five feet from an officer, and they say “You need to move back,” you might want to consider calmly saying “yes, officer, I am moving back” while taking a few steps back.

Below are some helpful resources and tips related to interacting with and filming the police from these groups and EFF:

  • The National Lawyers Guild (NLG) “Know Your Rights” pamphlet (available in multiple languages) provides basic information you should know for interacting with the police.
  • The NLG Legal Observer Program training manual has tips for filming the police at protests, many of which are useful for filming any encounter.
  • Cop Watch has resources and examples here.
  • EFF’s Know Your Rights guide provides information on what you need to know if the police want to search your electronic devices.

Why Focus on Citizen Recording When Departments Are Implementing Bodycams? 

As the conversation about police accountability continues to take place across the country, body cameras are often proposed as a solution, and they are getting a lot of attention in the news right now. “Bodycam” recordings have made a difference in some cases. But many transparency and accountability advocates including EFF, have expressed reasonable doubts about their efficacy.  States are trying to grapple with the many privacy issues they raise, mostly by considering exempting the footage from public records act requests. And while “bodycams” may be a contentious subject, there’s little doubt that it is citizen footage of law enforcement encounters that has really fueled the current debate about police accountability.

Keep Taping

As North Charleston Pastor Nelson Rivers said: “If not for the video, we would still be following the narrative from the officer. If not for this video, the story would be entirely different.” Scott’s family agrees. After watching the video, his brother stated: “I think that if that man never showed the video we would not be at the point that we’re at right now.” And North Charleston Councilwoman Dorothy Williams had this to say: “I’m asking all the citizens of North Charleston to continue taping.”

You don’t have to live in North Charleston to know why that’s a good idea.

Disclosure: Nadia Kayyali serves as the Vice-President for the National Lawyers Guild SF Bay Area Chapter, has served on the NLG’s national board, and has been involved with the NLG legal observer program nationally for over four years.

 

Smart Meters: Enforcement Of Mandatory Water Restrictions Is Only Just The Beginning

smart water meter

Smart meters are now being used by authorities to crack down on “water wasters” in the state of California, but this is just the tip of the iceberg as far as what they can be used for.  Ultimately, smart meters are designed to be part of an entire “smart grid” that will enable government bureaucrats “to control everything from your dishwasher to thermostat“.   And in recent years, there has been a massive push to install smart meters in as many homes in the United States and Europe as possible.  Back in December 2007, there were only 7 million smart meters installed in this country.  Today there are more than 51 million.  On the other side of the Atlantic, the European Parliament has set a goal of having smart meters in 80 percent of all homes by the year 2020.  This is being promoted as the “green” thing to do, but could it be possible that there is more to these smart meters than meets the eye?

In Long Beach, California authorities were getting complaints that a local McDonald’s restaurant was wasting water in the middle of the night.

So what did the authorities do?

They installed a smart meter which instantly started providing incriminating evidence against McDonald’s.  The following comes from CBS Los Angeles

The Long Beach Water Department says sprinklers at a McDonald’s restaurant on Bellflower Boulevard went on for 45 minutes at a time, twice a night, for an undefined number of nights. Complaints continued to mount as water pooled and wasted. The department, however, could do little about the wasting.

That was before the smart meter.

Since its installation in February, Long Beach Water Department General Manager Kevin Wattier says he saw an immediate spike by tens of thousands of gallons, each time McDonald’s overwatered their property.

And according to NPR, other large California cities are also now looking into how they can use smart meters to enforce the new mandatory water restrictions in the state…

By next February, California cities together are supposed to cut their water use by a quarter. Sacramento, San Francisco and some Central Valley cities are also seeing whether smart meters can help.

But smart meters are capable of determining far more than whether or not we are using too much water.

Already, police all over the country are using the data provided by smart meters to identify homes that are potentially growing marijuana.  Homes that grow marijuana tend to use much more electricity than other homes, and so if your home is using a high level of energy that is a red flag for the cops.

In addition, there are a whole host of other ways that smart meters can be used as surveillance devices by law enforcement.  The following list comes from an electronics and media expert from Burbank, California named Jerry Day…

1. They individually identify electrical devices inside the home and record when they are operated causing invasion of privacy.

2. They monitor household activity and occupancy in violation of rights and domestic security.

3. They transmit wireless signals which may be intercepted by unauthorized and unknown parties. Those signals can be used to monitor behavior and occupancy and they can be used by criminals to aid criminal activity against the occupants.

4. Data about occupant’s daily habits and activities are collected, recorded and stored in permanent databases which are accessed by parties not authorized or invited to know and share that private data.

5. Those with access to the smart meter databases can review a permanent history of household activities complete with calendar and time-of-day metrics to gain a highly invasive and detailed view of the lives of the occupants.

6. Those databases may be shared with, or fall into the hands of criminals, blackmailers, law enforcement, private hackers of wireless transmissions, power company employees, and other unidentified parties who may act against the interests of the occupants under metered surveillance.

7. “Smart Meters” are, by definition, surveillance devices which violate Federal and State wiretapping laws by recording and storing databases of private and personal activities and behaviors without the consent or knowledge of those people who are monitored.

8. It is possible for example, with analysis of certain “Smart Meter” data, for unauthorized and distant parties to determine medical conditions, sexual activities, physical locations of persons within the home, vacancy patterns and personal information and habits of the occupants.

If all of that wasn’t bad enough, there are also substantial concerns about the impact that these smart meters are having on our health

According to physician and epidemiologist Sam Milham, Smart Meters, which are linked to an array of health issues, emit as much as 100 times the amount of radiation as a cell phone.

Daniel Hirsch, a senior lecturer on nuclear policy at UCSC, says the federal government purposely misleads the public by conducting biased safety studies at the behest of power companies.

A Washington DC power company stirred controversy in 2013 after they were caught lying to the public about how often their smart meters emitted radiation. Despite claims that the meters only emitted radiation once every 4 to 6 hours, an investigation by WUSA9 News revealed the frequency to be closer to 4 to 6 times every minute.

When there is that much radiation blasting through our homes on a continual basis, it is inevitable that there are going to be health problems.

According to Infowars, tens of thousands of people have already reported significant health issues that they believe are directly related to the installation of smart meters in their homes…

Tens of thousands of individuals are reporting officially, to governments and utilities, that they are experiencing illness or functional impairments following the installation of “smart” meters. Reported symptoms include headaches, sleep problems, ear ringing, focus difficulties, fatigue, heart palpitations, nausea and statistically abnormal recurrences of cancer.

Perhaps you are dealing with one of the health issues just mentioned.

If so, you might want to check to see if you have a smart meter in your home.

There has got to be a better way for the state of California to monitor water usage rather than smart meters.

And without a doubt, the state of California is facing a crisis of unprecedented proportions.  The snowpack in the Sierras is only 5 percent of the long-term historical average.  Snow levels are currently at the lowest levels ever measured for this time of the year, and the snow is melting five to 30 days earlier than normal.  For much more on the nightmare that the state is dealing with, please see my previous article entitled “How Many People Will Have To Migrate Out Of California When All The Water Disappears?

Thankfully, there is a lot of waste that can be eliminated, so a lot of water can potentially be saved.  It turns out that Californians are some of the biggest water wasters on the entire planet.  The following statistic comes from the New York Times

California’s cities consume 178 gallons per person per day, on average. That’s 40 percent more than the per capita water consumption in New York City and more than double that of parched Sydney, in Australia.

So let’s hope that Californians start banding together and begin using water more wisely, because this drought is not likely to go away any time soon.

And the truth is that what is going on in the state of California is kind of a microcosm of the water crisis that is beginning to emerge all over the globe

The move by California to require mandatory cuts in water use for the first time in its history has highlighted the world’s looming water crisis and increased the focus on the links between sustainable water and sustainable energy.

“We need a new paradigm,” says Steven Solomon, author of Water: The Epic Struggle for Wealth, Power and Civilization. “The days when we could just go further into the mountains and find new sources of water are past. We need to make better use of the water we have.”

In the end, the drought in California is going to affect all of us.  A tremendous amount of our produce is grown in the state, and we will all soon be feeling the pain of the drought in our local grocery stores

As California’s multi-year drought rages on, consumers in the rest of the United States may soon be feeling the pinch at the grocery store as farmers around California reduce water and plant fewer crops.

California, sometimes called the ‘nation’s salad bowl’, is the country’s largest producer of grapes, kiwis, olives, avocados, broccoli, tomatoes, spinach, tree nuts and dairy. Now in the fourth year of a massive drought ‒ and facing only a year’s worth of water remaining in the state ‒ food prices in the US and agricultural unemployment in California are set to climb as farmers do what they can to conserve water and protect their investments.

So what do you think about all of this?

Please feel free to add to the discussion by posting a comment below…


Michael T. Snyder is a graduate of the McIntire School of Commerce at the University of Virginia and has a law degree and an LLM from the University of Florida Law School. He is an attorney that has worked for some of the largest and most prominent law firms in Washington D.C. and who now spends his time researching and writing and trying to wake the American people up. You can follow his work on The Economic Collapse blog, End of the American Dream and The Truth Wins. His new novel entitled “The Beginning Of The End” is now available on Amazon.com.

Rising Enemy Within: Private Police Fits New World Order Script

security

First I want to say that many corporate (security) sympathizers tend to defend private policing, but this article will debunk all their arguments here and show how private policing is the end-all end-game ultimate threat to freedom in America and humanity as a whole, all in the name of protecting corporate profits $$ while working hand in hand with government for their greater long term new world order plans.

In 2014 I covered the rising threat of private security now arresting American citizens in the streets of America after witnessing firsthand the arrest of a gentleman in Hollywood California. The private security company looked very threatening with guns, bullet proof vests and the whole tyranny outfit. The frightening scene looked more like a SWAT military situation with around 10-15 fully armed agents and multiple nearly unmarked cars only there were no tanks or machine guns that I saw. To my chagrin, a closer looked showed that no police was present, all of this was being done in the name of private police!

Since this article and accompanying video, I’ve been attacked by some with comments claiming this is no big deal, that I’m exaggerating, an idiot, a fool and that I don’t know what I’m talking about because private security is a good thing. Let’s take a look at the issue more closely.

To add some historic perspective, private security has been around in the U.S. since at least the late 1800’s. Private security boomed in the early 20th century and by the 1930’s private security companies were becoming a problem due to their questionable tactics. According to one research site:

The early twentieth century might be thought of as a golden age of private detective firms. The Pinkerton Agency, for example, is credited with influencing the development of investigation techniques used by the public police through its systems of surveillance and its development of a file system that was used by the Federal Bureau of Investigation until it developed its own case file system (Sklansky 1999; Draper 1978; O’Reilly and Ellison 2004). Indeed, it was not until the 1930s that private security stature and legitimacy came to be questioned. A significant event in this process was the establishment of the La Follette Committee to investigate threats to civil liberties (particularly labor-related threats) associated with the private security industry. A particular cause for concern was Pinkerton’s use of espionage techniques and other methods to break strikes and monitor industrial activities.

As you can see, back in the 1930’s private security was already corrupt, helping police and government to spy on citizens illegally. All in the name of profits and long term government agenda. Even back then, the citizens were the enemy and government agenda and profits were the goal. Since way back then up to this day private security is sold to Americans as a tool for “safety” and this is a lie we’ll deal with later.

One thing that should concern all American citizens is the rate of growth of private security/police. According to a series of reports by Hallcrest known as ”Hallcrest Report I: Private Security and Police in America” and ”Hallcrest Report II: Private Security Trends 1970-2000,” which were published in 1985 and 1990 respectively, private security back then already outnumbered public police by about 3:1 ratio. Similarly, according to Wikipedia by 1990 private security constituted three quarters of all police in America.

So without a doubt the concept of private security is looked upon favorably by government who always works with corporations to get their agenda done. This exponential rising of private security should alarm everyone that it is all by design not by coincidence. The argument of “free enterprise” cannot be applied here. This is policing of we-the-people, it fits in with government’s desire to control the people and government has been involved in this growth from the beginning working hand in hand with private security unlike a service or product that is truly a result of the free market.

Debunking the rationalization of private policing

Undeniably, private police expand exponentially the amount of police personnel available to control, surveil, snitch, report, punish, arrest, fine and detain civilians. This exponential policing plays into the police state and the new world order plans perfectly. Despite all of this, some people who defend private policing are resorting to same handful of excuses to rationalize or justify the need for private police. Here are some of the claims made.

1- Private police are more “trustworthy” than public police

Those that defend private policing claim that private police are more trust worthy than public police. This is an ad hominem based on assumptions and not based on any actual evidence. This ad hominem excuse takes a known problem (police are corrupt) and uses this known problem to leap to an unproven conclusion- that private security must somehow be more honest. As noted above, private police had integrity and ethical issues going back to the early part of the 20th century and that has never changed. Private security benefited as much or more than any other industry after 9/11 and there is no reason to think they are honest, have integrity or have an incentive to look out for individual citizens and freedom.

Let’s not forget that private police do not take an oath to defend the U.S. Constitution. They are not sworn to protect citizens, they are sometimes (depending where they work) expected to defend “customers” but that is only related to ‘customer relations’ which is ultimately related to corporate profits. The idea that a group of people who only answer to a for-profit corporation can be trusted to defend basic human rights, human dignity, and freedom when it is clearly not in their job description or call of duty is entirely unrealistic and naive.

2- Private police serve the “greater good”

Those defending private policing claim that the private police, specifically those part of BID or Business Improvement Districts which are now being given the power to arrest American citizens on the streets serve the neighborhood and act as good ambassadors. They argue as if private security is a virtuous well meaning entity only interested in peace and love. Where have we heard this before? Government has been claiming this for years- ‘Government is good, government cares about you…’ and so on. And anyone paying attention knows these are just lies to pacify anyone stupid enough to think that government (or private security) actually cares about you. Thus the private security/private police advocates are playing the exact same card claiming it’s for the greater good of the neighborhood and it’s all lies and theater. They operate for the greater good of profits and to support the rising police state and new world order nothing else.

As for the actual private security officers, the foot soldiers on the streets, they are being lied to just like our military is lied to. The illusion that public police are lied to and military are lied to for the greater agenda but that somehow private police are not lied to, is naive and ignorant. Those defending private policing are thus only seeing the narrow picture and ignoring what is really happening with the rise of the police state and tyranny. That’s the police state and the rising tyranny that their bosses won’t tell them about. Their job, just like the military, is to shut up and do as they are told. When will people finally realize that it’s ALL about money and power?

3- Private police/security keep neighborhoods “safe”

This brings up the importance of distinguishing between “feeling” safe versus actual crime drops. Yes people “feel” safer with private security but is this based on any reality? Doesn’t the control system deliberately keep the people in fear in order to justify more and more policing, all for your supposed own “safety”??

If you ask me, constitutionally speaking, citizens have the right to protect themselves and provide their own safety. If we needed to be kept safe from danger this is all the more reason for average citizens to exercise their 2nd Amendment rights to bear arms. The notion that you need to be kept safe by a 3rd party for-profit group of people is a joke and a deception to justify the police state while increasing profits.

With that said, studies have been done in the past evaluating the crime drop effect of the Guardian Angels in the 1970’s in San Diego. At least one study showed that the neighborhoods not policed by the Guardian Angels showed LESS crimes than those policed by the Guardian Angels. As expected people said they felt “safer” and “property” crime specifically dropped.

They seem to cut crime a bit. The most detailed research on their activities compared an area of San Diego patrolled by the Angels with a part of the city where they were absent. Surprisingly, violent crime fell more in the “ordinary” area than in the one patrolled by the Angels. But property crime fell much more in the area where the Angels operated. One finding though, was unequivocal: 60% of residents said they felt safer thanks to the youngsters’ presence.

Once again, this serves as a reminder that the “safety” sold by these private for-profit corporations is about keeping property safe not people safe. It’s also about giving private for-profit corporations LEGAL power over you. It’s a corporate takeover in many ways. Corporations have long wanted this power and more than ever now they see a chance to truly have power over you.

More problems with private police

The fact of the matter is that once we accept the concept of private police roaming the streets of America with power to arrest and detain as the private military corporation Blackwater had in Iraq, the sky is the limit for these corrupt corporations working with government as we saw with Blackwater aka Academy, XE. Remember, as with Blackwater/Academy/XE there is no guarantee that these private police will do what is moral, ethical, or what is right because they are entirely unregulated and unaccountable to the public. They only answer to a corporate for-profit entity. If you think public police, who actually take an oath to defend the Constitution, are corrupt, wait till the UN-accountable private police mafia becomes the norm. Corruption is a human problem not a public police problem and it is everywhere and any American who naively accepts this new private police paradigm is literally signing off on the end of America.

Private police is not militia

Do not confuse the concept of private militias with private corporate for-profit police. Huge difference! Some people are trying to defend private police by painting them out to be equivalent to the militia “for the people”. Don’t go for this. The idea of a militia, which not surprisingly the government opposes (think Bundy Ranch standoff), is designed to guard the people of the republic from a tyrannical government. Private police on the other hand, are contributing to the concept of tyrannical government and would never align themselves against a corrupt government.

Ask yourself, why is our government so eager to give power to private police? So eager the practice goes back over 100 years? Why are private police never portrayed by the mainstream media as un-American, potential threat to freedom or a potential terror threat like they portray the militias??

If and when it all goes down (SHTF), if and when order is lost and tyranny and martial law completely takes over, you can be sure all of these unregulated, unconstitutional private security working for these for-profit corporations endorsed by big government will act as an extension of government. Anyone who thinks otherwise is fooling themselves.

The rise of these never-to-be-trusted for-profit private police with the power to arrest is thus a major threat to America any way you look at it and every American better be ready and do what you can now to oppose this course we are on. Those defending this agenda, like those who defend endless war and fake terror will argue violently to defend both their profits and the long term agenda that guarantees them a seat at the table of power and tyranny so don’t be fooled.

Don’t forget that Hitler had his private police also who operated under private rules and committed atrocities. Private mercenaries have arguably a bloodier history than public police and armies. The lessen to learn here is that humans can be corrupt and humans under the control of a tyrant or tyrannical empire will do as they are told.

Psychology experiments have proven this over and over again. Humans will do as they are told even if it means harming, illegally detaining, arresting, even torturing or murdering someone in the name of “I was told to do it”.

So as the rise of the nearly invisible threat of private police continues in America let’s remember the past days when it was ‘only’ the public police killing the innocent and the general public was able to identify public police corruption and stand up to it. Let’s remember how bad it was when the “regulated” police was killing everyone without consequences. Let’s remember when the evil and corruption was still quantifiable because when the rise of private police is done, the corruption and evil will be so impossible to stop or even quantify that we will all be in danger.

Just imagine how easy it will be for big government to reach into your life when anyone can don a uniform and claim to be “private police”. This is the same government who has created, armed and funded Al Qaeda and ISIS. Think about this- What will you do when private police begin to wear masks to hide their faces for “protective” reasons just like the riot police do now? What about when a few false flags result in the new regulation that allows private police to have military gear? Get the picture? Anyone who thinks this is not the road we are on is lying to you and to themselves and probably just defending private security and private police profits.

Consider that since 9/11 the U.S. has spend billions of dollars on so called Private Military Corporations or PMC’s. If the U.S. government is willing to fund privatization of murder in other countries why would they not do it at home? Think. Who are these companies who are being given the authority to arrest U.S. citizens in the streets of America? What ties do they have to government?

Finally, what we are seeing is Obama’s promise to recruit a private army of civilians come to pass. Amazing isn’t it? With all the campaign promises broken, THIS ONE he keeps! In his campaign Obama said:

“We cannot continue to rely only on our military…we’ve got to have a civilian security force just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.  We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we’ve set.”

This was in the plans all along. So what will you do when the day comes that someone knocks on your door and it’s not the police? They’re armed, they’re scary and they’re looking for you but it’s not police, it’s outsourced private police. Who will you turn to then?

In the end, this is all part of the new world order where the life and freedom of the individual is expendable. Where the individual has no rights and is just a pawn in a bigger scheme of profits, power and control. Speak up now or forever hold your peace. The takeover is underway from within, can you hear the footsteps coming? Can you see the cage with your name on it from here? Or perhaps you can see your name on that tombstone with the words engraved “Live free or die”.


Bernie Suarez is a revolutionary writer with a background in medicine, psychology, and information technology. He has written numerous articles over the years about freedom, government corruption and conspiracies, and solutions. A former host of the 9/11 Freefall radio show, Bernie is also the creator of the Truth and Art TV project where he shares articles and videos about issues that raise our consciousness and offer solutions to our current problems. His efforts are designed to encourage others to joyfully stand for truth, to expose government tactics of propaganda, fear and deception, and to address the psychology of dealing with the rising new world order. He is also a former U.S. Marine who believes it is our duty to stand for and defend the U.S. Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic. A peace activist, he believes information and awareness is the first step toward being free from enslavement from the globalist control system which now threatens humanity. He believes love conquers all fear and it is up to each and every one of us to manifest the solutions and the change that you want to see in this world, because doing this is the very thing that will ensure victory and restoration of the human race from the rising global enslavement system, and will offer hope to future generations.