Tag Archives: vaccinations

Texas Clinics Turning Away Unvaccinated Children

austin-regional-clinic

By: Adan Salazar | Infowars.com

Hippocratic oath takes backseat to Big Pharma inoculation program.

A network of clinics in Texas has issued new guidelines asserting their facilities will no longer take children as patients if they have not been vaccinated.

Austin Regional Clinic, the largest healthcare provider network in the Central Texas region serving close to half a million residents, announced today they will begin prohibiting children who are not up to date on vaccine requirements from being seen by doctors starting tomorrow.

“The physicians and staff at Austin Regional Clinic support immunizations,” a statement on the ARC site says. “If you plan not to immunize your child, we prefer that you choose another practice. We do not want to place the rest of our patients at risk of contracting vaccine-preventable illnesses.”

“Parents who are unwilling to commit to a vaccination schedule will need to find another physician outside of ARC,” a press release states.

The ARC’s recommended vaccine schedule lists at least 21 innoculations infants should receive before the first year of age, many of which can admittedly cause severe adverse reactions – including death – largely in part to the ease by which toxicants can permeate children’s underdeveloped blood-brain barriers.

Notably, the list also recommends children receive a dose of Merck’s controversial Gardasil vaccine by age nine, despite reports that hundreds of young women in the US have died, and tens of thousands have been harmed by it. “Routine dosing intervals are recommended,” a handout from the clinic states.

Specifically, the clinic says parents may be confused about vaccines due to “misinformation in the media and on biased websites.”

Perhaps they find it biased to point out the fact that the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program has, via a secretive, letigious network of courts, paid out nearly $3 billion to families who’ve suffered death or other debilitating side effects as a result of vaccines.

Russ Krienke, ARC’s chief medical officer, said the decision was based on ensuring the “facilities are safe” for all of its visiting patients.

“[W]hile we respect the right of families to make their own choices for their children, we also respect the trust our patients put in us to ensure the safety of all, and our policies must honor that trust,” Krienke said.

The clinic’s announcement follows passage of California’s SB 277 mandatory vaccination bill, which forces all public school attendees be up to date on their vaccine requirements as mandated by the state’s department of public health.

 

Forced Vaccine Bill Author Sen. Pan Was Top Recipient Of Big Pharma Cash

dr-richard-pan
By: Heather Callaghan | NaturalBlaze.com

Big Pharma Donated Millions to California Lawmakers Before Launching Vaccine “Debate”.

A push for mandatory vaccination continues as SB277 makes its way through California’s Capitol. It is a shining monument to Big Pharma’s coffers and medical control as the bill removes religious and philosophical exemptions for student vaccination, leaving only medical exemptions signed by MDs. Since medical exemptions are rare, it forces parents to take their child into the doctor’s for jabs or be removed from school – a violation of the right to attend public school.

Perhaps by stirring a national “debate,” the pharmaceutical companies made people forget that there is no crisis and that California’s children have been above a 97% vaccination rate. Yet, at least as early as February, simultaneous bills cropped up across the states to remove the ability to decide, and in many cases the ability to decide scheduling/spacing. That last note has frustrated and unnerved parents who vaccinate but like to have some oversight on the amount of injections given per visit.

Recall that six months ago the paradigm was completely different. Online arguments about vaccination were different. Emotions were controlled. Division tactics were subtle. The term “anti-vaxxer” wasn’t really part of the collective lexicon – at least not spat out in viciousness or disdain. No one called for personal calamity, sickness or death on anyone else. No one shunned their neighbors or their neighbors’ children as walking germ bombs or leper terrorists.

As I’ve written before – this vaccine “debate” we keep hearing about is a joke. A real debate involves two consenting parties and suggests some kind of civil discourse. It is not a “corporament” attempting to seize power and remove another person’s rights by forcing their will. There was never a debate for people who were hurled into the witch hunt.

Sadly, the “debate” requires people who can write and push these bills – and they have ravenous appetites…

A Sacramento Bee reporter didn’t initially find a strong link between the pharmaceutical companies and legislators readily on paper and certainly not admitted by pharma reps.

However (emphasis added),

Other legislation has a more direct bearing on the industry, and it is an active political player. Pharmaceutical companies and their trade groups gave more than $2 million to current members of the Legislature in 2013-2014, about 2 percent of the total raised, records show. Nine of the top 20 recipients are either legislative leaders or serve on either the Assembly or Senate health committees. Receiving more than $95,000, the top recipient of industry campaign cash is Sen. Richard Pan, a Sacramento Democrat and doctor who is carrying the vaccine bill.

Also see: Senator Pan’s Outrageous Vaccine Lies

Reporter Jim Miller also found that “the industry donated more than $500,000 to outside campaign spending groups that helped elect some current members last year.”

Look what else the Bee found for 2013-2014

TOP DRUG MAKER RECIPIENTS – *Member of the Assembly or Senate health committees
Lawmaker
Party/District
Amount
Sen. Richard Pan*
D-Sacramento
$95,150
Assembly Speaker Toni Atkins
D-San Diego
$90,250
Sen. Ed Hernandez*
D-Azusa
$67,750
Sen. Holly Mitchell*
D-Los Angeles
$60,107
Assemblyman Brian Maienschein*
R-San Diego
$59,879
Senate President Pro Tem Kevin de León
D-Los Angeles
$56,648
Sen. Isadore Hall
D-Compton
$52,400
Sen. Jerry Hill
D-San Mateo
$50,209
Assemblyman Henry Perea
D-Fresno
$49,550
Assemblywoman Shirley Weber
D-San Diego
$47,000
Assemblyman Mike Gatto
D-Los Angeles
$46,491
Assemblywoman Susan A. Bonilla*
D-Concord
$45,600
Sen. Andy Vidak
R-Hanford
$42,800
Assemblyman Tom Daly
D-Anaheim
$40,300
Assemblyman Kevin Mullin
D-South San Francisco
$38,400
Assemblyman Adam Gray
D-Merced
$37,000
Assemblyman Rob Bonta*
D-Alameda
$36,750
Assemblyman Anthony Rendon
D-Lakewood
$36,200
Assemblyman Jimmy Gomez*
D-Los Angeles
$33,850
Assemblyman Richard Gordon
D-Menlo Park
$33,100

See the amounts Big Pharma directly lobbied: http://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article24913978.html#storylink=cpy

Did you hear a cha-ching! every time you saw the dollar amount next to member’s name who had direct involvement in the bill? Remember these pharma gifts were given before there was “debate” about vaccines, before any outbreak.

Personal rights are not up for debate, and they certainly don’t go to the highest bidder. They don’t go away so that corrupt politicians can count money and take extra vacations after we’ve already provided their retirement.

Please act now and don’t let the world’s second largest* corporate conglomerate call the shots on children’s health and seal the deal for all the vaccines they have waiting in the pipeline.

A removal of choice now is a removal of all medical choice later…

*The largest industry is the arms industry – i.e. war


Heather Callaghan is a natural health blogger and food freedom activist. You can see her work at NaturalBlaze.com and ActivistPost.com. Like at Facebook.

WHO African Region Plagued By Dangerously Timed Vaccinations

US_Navy_090310-N-0506A-059_A_World_Health_Organization_(WHO)_staff_member_vaccinates_a_baby_during_a_Combined_Joint_Task_Force-Horn_of_Africa_medical_civ

An alarming study published in the prestigious journal Vaccine finds that children in Africa are receiving inappropriately timed and spaced vaccines at epidemic rates.

A highly concerning study published in Vaccine titled “Evaluation of invalid vaccine doses in 31 countries of the WHO African Region,” reveals that infants within the countries of the World Health Organization (WHO) African Region are routinely being given inappropriately timed and spaced vaccine doses, presumably putting them at far greater risk of vaccine associated adverse health effects.  Remarkably, this is the first study of its kind to systematically evaluate invalid vaccine doses in the African Region.

screen shot

The study used data from a decade’s worth of vaccine records from 31 African region countries representing a population of 134,442 individuals, and determined invalidly timed and spaced vaccinations for three vaccines (diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis [DTP1, DTP3] and measles-containing vaccine (MCV)) using WHO criteria.

The study found the median percentages of invalid DTP1, DTP3 and MCV vaccinations across all countries were 12.1% (interquartile range, 9.4–15.2%), 5.7% (5.0–7.6%), and 15.5% (10.0–18.1%), respectively.  Moreover, they found:

  • That of the invalid DTP1 vaccinations, 7.4% and 5.5% were administered at child’s age of less than one and two weeks, respectively.
  • In 12 countries, the proportion of invalid DTP3 vaccinations administered with an interval of less than two weeks before the preceding dose varied between 30% and 50%.
  • In 13 countries, the proportion of MCV doses administered at child’s age of less than six months varied between 20% and 45%.

The study found,”a substantial proportion of children in this region were vaccinated earlier than recommended or received vaccine doses spaced inappropriately close to each other.”

The study also acknowledged that presently the criteria with which the success of the immunization campaign in Africa are evaluated is based solely on coverage levels but does not take into account whether these vaccines are being administered properly, i.e. their so-called “validity.”

Discussion

The study has a number of disturbing implications. First, it is known that vaccination timing can profoundly affect both the risk of adverse effects and its claimed effectiveness. Generally, the earlier that vaccines are administered, and the shorter the interval between them, the more likely they will cause harm, including sudden infant death, which we have reported previously here. Also, the recent CDC whistleblower scandal revealed that the agency knew that the sooner African-American boys were vaccinated with MMR the higher their risk of autism (3.4 fold increased risk). Clearly this link between vaccine timeliness and adverse effects is so well known that even the CDC and the mainstream media has chosen to cover it up.

Second, because early or poorly spaced vaccinations are classified as invalid by the WHO some countries recommend repeating them at the appropriate age, this further increases the risk additive or synergistic adverse health effects from over-vaccination.

Like so many studies published in journals like Vaccine that assume a priori the benefits of vaccination outweigh their risks, the authors concluded that while invalid vaccinations are surprisingly common in African countries, the real risk is in the failure to optimally protect against vaccine-preventable infections and not the health risks of the inappropriately administered vaccines themselves:

“Timing of childhood vaccinations should be improved to ensure an optimal protection against vaccine-preventable infections and to avoid unnecessary wastage in these economically deprived countries.”

This is all the more disingenuous considering that research already exists revealing that certain vaccine campaigns in Africa have resulted in increased risk of death, as well as the accumulating body of research showing over a hundred adverse health effects linked to vaccination signaled by the peer-reviewed published literature itself. There are also highly concerning reports that African children have been enrolled in dangerous vaccine experiments without their parent’s consent.

Studies like this demonstrate just how illusory is the concept that global vaccine agendas such as occurring in Africa are actually working.  We should expect that at the very least the vaccines should be administered appropriately, presumably as the scientific evidence itself dictates, for there to be any assurance that they will produce safe and effective outcomes. Sadly, however, the evidence itself increasingly points to the dramatic disconnect between vaccine policy and their real-world effects.


Article Contributed by Sayer Ji, Founder of GreenMedInfo.com.

Sayer Ji is an author, researcher, lecturer, and advisory board member of the National Health Federation. He founded Greenmedinfo.com in 2008 in order to provide the world an open access, evidence-based resource supporting natural and integrative modalities. It is internationally recognized as the largest and most widely referenced health resource of its kind.

The Silent Vaccine Epidemic: Experts Explain Why Vaccines Are Not Life Savers (VIDEO)

Documentary-The-Untold-Story-of-Vaccines

(The Real Agenda) Aluminum, insect repellent, formaldehyde, mercury, fetal tissue, and in some cases attenuated or live viruses are some of the ingredients present in vaccines today, yet, we are told they are the reason why humanity’s overall health and well-being has improved dramatically.

Traditional medicine cooked up by pharmaceutical companies dictates that vaccines are life savers, but there is a growing movement in the medical field that includes doctors and nurses -supported by scientists and evidence- who not only warn about the potential risks on vaccines, but also about its lack of effectiveness..

The conclusion reached by this group of concerned professionals is simple: There isn’t strong evidence to support the claim that vaccines are capable of doing what the medical industry says they do. That is why governments at the local, regional and national levels, supported by alleged international health agencies are tightening the grip on vaccination policies, making vaccines mandatory, even though there is no law that mandates vaccinations.

Despite the heavy use of vaccines since a child is born, it is not difficult to learn about the efficacy of vaccines -or the lack of it- because doctors, nurses and parents have had a front row seat to witnessing the appearance of the unhealthiest population of children in the history of humanity.

Parallel to the appearance of diseases that were thought to be extinct such as asthma, diabetes, arthritis, cancer, chicken pox, eczema and many others, health issues that were supposedly treated and eradicated with vaccines are also reappearing despite so-called medical advances in the 20th and 21st centuries.

Vaccine pushers like to blame those who decide not to vaccinate themselves and their children as the culprits of the reappearance of disease, but in truth, that which is to blame is unscientific postulates, such as herd immunity, the bedrock over which mass vaccination has been supported on for ages.

While parents and doctors who ask questions about the effectiveness of vaccines are ostracized, label as heretics and often verbally and physically abused by the system, children continue to get sick after being injected cocktails of chemicals known as vaccines. Many of these children remain damaged for life, while others die as a result of side effects.

It is impossible not to be suspicious about vaccines and pharmaceutical companies regarding the safety and effectiveness of their products. One of the aspects that makes people question these products is the fact that vaccine makers legally exempted from lawsuits regarding potential damage that result from vaccines.

Another point that many people raise is the existence of a special vaccine court created by the medical industry and government agencies, where people damaged by vaccines take their cases, as supposed to a traditional court. Then, there is the fact that should a vaccine manufacturer be found liable for the negative medical consequences of their vaccines, it is the government, not the vaccine maker that compensates people for vaccine side effects.

Tens of millions of dollars have been granted to parentes and children whose lives were damaged by vaccines. Of course, this fact is kept as quiet as possible by the mainstream media, as they receive billions of dollars in advertising money from the pharmacetical industry every year.

These and other issues about vaccines are addressed in the documentary produced by Gary Null, titled “Silent Epidemic; The Untold Story of Vaccines“, in which medical experts, not journalists or ‘kooks’ explain why vaccines are one of the biggest hoaxes in history.

We encourage everyone to watch the documentary below and critically analyze the arguments posed by these experts before making a decision on whether it is necessary to vaccinate and if they can trust their health to vaccine makers.


Luis R. Miranda is an award-winning journalist and the founder and editor-in-chief at The Real Agenda. His career spans over 18 years and almost every form of news media. His articles include subjects such as environmentalism, Agenda 21, climate change, geopolitics, globalisation, health, vaccines, food safety, corporate control of governments, immigration and banking cartels, among others. Luis has worked as a news reporter, on-air personality for Live and Live-to-tape news programs. He has also worked as a script writer, producer and co-producer on broadcast news. Read more about Luis.

Shocking: WHO Urges More Vaccinations

vaccines
By: The Real Agenda |

The WHO is calling on countries to demand more vaccinations at lower prices.

The World Health Organization (WHO), through its executive body, The World Health Assembly, has approved a resolution that calls for more affordable vaccines and greater transparency in the pricing of vaccines.

Despite historically abundant data regarding vaccine ineffectiveness and proven dangers, especially in children, the WHO insists on calling for an increased use of vaccines to “fight disease” worldwide.

The text approved by the WHO indicates the “concern” that has been generated regarding its global immunization coverage, which according to the text has increased only “slightly” from the end of the first decade of the century.

Although it has been proven that increases in disease are strongly related to lifestyle changes, environmental pollution and lack of nutrition, to cite three factors, the medical establishment insists in pushing dangerously contaminated vaccines whose effectiveness is far from being proven.

“In 2013 more than 21 million children under one year did not complete all three doses of DTP (diphtheria, pertussis and tetanus),” recalls the resolution adopted at the 68th meeting, held until Tuesday in Geneva. The WHO forgot to point out in its report, that DTP vaccines can cause brain damage and death.

The text voted late Monday afternoon added that many countries each year, “expressed concern about the unaffordable cost of new vaccines and call on the international community to support strategies to reduce prices.”

This is a very effective strategy by health authorities, both at the national and international levels. They launch campaigns claiming that access to certain pharmaceutical products are unaffordable or scarce to have people react in fear and demand more vaccines, even though vaccines never helped prevent or cure disease.

Examples of this practice include the H1N1 fake scare and the resurgence of once eradicated diseases, which according to the WHO are making a comeback because of lack of vaccination, when in reality the reasons are lack of sanitation and proper nutrition.

WHO is also warning of “inequality” between countries, because there are some who have no income to bring universal vaccination for everyone. Inequality is a very effective propaganda weapon used by the elite to push for changes that are beneficial to them.

Politicians and philanthropists spend more time talking about inequality than poverty, for example. That is because inequality immediately activates people’s radar for what they may think is living in unfair, less advantageous conditions; as if having they are being robbed of something they are entitled to, such as access to more vaccinations.

That is why we hear more politicians and philanthropists, who have a stake in Big Pharma and other corporations, talk about all kinds of inequality: social inequality, environmental inequality and now vaccination inequality. It is a con game. The catch in each of those arguments is that members of the elite seek to sway public opinion in the direction that is favorable to them, not to the large masses, however, most people are not sophisticated enough to understand it.

Another problem is the “shortage” of some traditional vaccines such as that for measles and rubella. This statement again goes against scientific observation on the field, which concludes that increases in disease incidence have nothing to do with lack of vaccination, but with drinking contaminated water, breathing polluted air and eating pesticide infested foods.

The General Assembly recalls that at times immunizations do not arrive on time, so immunization schedules are not respected, and calls for the improvement of production and distribution systems.

“The resolution breaks the schemes on this issue as it is one of the first occasions on which 60 countries are publicly positioned against the high cost of vaccines and the lack of transparency on prices,” said Doctors Without Borders (MSF) in a note.

WHO recommends greater price transparency of the vaccine as a key step towards improving accessibility. “Publicly available information on prices of vaccines is limited,” he says. “And that data availability is important to facilitate the efforts of Member States to introduce new vaccines,” says the text.

The WHO is calling on countries to demand more vaccinations at lower prices because most third world nations have no economic means to sustain traditional vaccination campaigns, yet it does not talk about improving living conditions in those countries so people can have access to clean water, pesticide and GMO free food, housing and other basic needs.

“This resolution also reflects the sad reality of some vaccines that are too expensive for many of the world’s population,” said Manica Balasegaram, executive director of the Campaign for Access to Essential Medicines at MSF.

“If governments do not take concrete steps to deal with vaccine prices, they will be forced to make difficult decisions against which diseases they can afford to protect their children.” As many people are aware, no independent study has ever tested any vaccine for its efficiency in preventing disease. In fact, in the last few years fully vaccinated populations are victims of disease outbreaks against which they have already been vaccinated.

As we have explained in previous articles that describe how to promote health and what kinds of foods and products people should stay away from to prevent disease, it is clear that the world’s health authorities do not want to accept that good health begins from the inside and that it cannot be achieved from the outside.

Eating nutritious food and supplementing our diets with vitamines and minerals are key to having a strong immune system that can undoubtedly deal with most disease. Instead, the WHO and many doctors out there still promote vaccines loaded with syntetic chemicals as the solution to supposedly prevent and cure disease.


Luis R. Miranda is an award-winning journalist and the founder and editor-in-chief at The Real Agenda. His career spans over 18 years and almost every form of news media. His articles include subjects such as environmentalism, Agenda 21, climate change, geopolitics, globalisation, health, vaccines, food safety, corporate control of governments, immigration and banking cartels, among others. Luis has worked as a news reporter, on-air personality for Live and Live-to-tape news programs. He has also worked as a script writer, producer and co-producer on broadcast news. Read more about Luis.

‘Germs’ Beat Vaccines At Their Own Game: Anti-Malarial Probiotics Show Promise

vaccines

A groundbreaking new study finds probiotic ‘germs’ may provide an alternative to vaccination for malaria – a finding that challenges fundamental tenets of both vaccinology and germ theory. 

The development of a malaria vaccine has been a persistent and heavily funded goal now for over half a century,[1] but to date not a single effective solution has been produced.

This is all the more surprising when you consider the roster of powerful organizations presently invested in finding one:

  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (particularly through PATH Malaria Vaccine Initiative)
  • The US National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Disease
  • The European Union DG
  • The United States Agency for International Development
  • The Wellcome Trust
  • The Medical Research Council UK
  • The European Vaccine Initiative (formerly EMVI)
  • The European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership
  • The World Health Organization [2]

Today, anti-malarial chemotherapy and so-called “vector control methods,” e.g. pesticides, are the primary prevention techniques, all of which carry serious unintended adverse health effects – some at least as serious a health threat as malaria itself. Ostensibly, a malaria vaccine would reduce the need for these ‘external’ measures by educating the body’s own immune system to fight a disease which accounts for over 207 million cases and 627,000 deaths annually, according to the World Health Organization’s “World Malaria Report” (2009). [3]

The scientific justification for the development of vaccines in general and the malaria vaccine in particular is based on the observation that surviving natural exposures to pathogens often results in lasting immunity. In the case of malaria, survival from initial infection and frequent re-exposures can result in the absence of clinical symptoms of infection. Also, when gamma-globulin fractions are transferred from semi-immune to naïve humans malaria disease severity is mitigated.[4] [5]

So why, given the feasibility of a vaccine and the virtually limitless financial, scientific and technological resources available to developing an effective solution, has none yet been produced?

This question could be raised for any number of vaccines either in development or already in present day ‘immunization’ schedules. HIV vaccines, for instance, have been a notorious failure, even increasing death rates in a recent clinical trial. And then there are the vaccines for mostly benign childhood infections, e.g. chickenpox, measles, mumps, etc., which now require multiple ‘boosters’ because the synthetic immunity they produce have a dismally short if not non-existence effectiveness.  Given the growing tide of vaccine failures in highly vaccine compliant populations, including: chickenpoxshingles, measlesmumpswhooping cough (pertussis)influenzaHPV (Gardasil)hepatitis B, the problem may not lie in the virulence or resistance of a particular pathogen — be it Ebola or malaria — rather, the problem may lie with the fundamental tenets of vaccinology itself, including germ theory, which our discovery of the microbiome and even the viral nature of key elements of our own genome has effectively obliterated.  In other words, vaccines cannot and do not replace the type of immunity produced through natural processes and natural exposures, and surprisingly, some ‘germs’ are actually required to fend off infection.

Illustrating exactly this point, a recent study published in the journal Cell titled “Gut Microbiota Elicits a Protective Immune Response against Malaria Transmission,” [6]  reveals that the human gut bacteria Escherichia coli 086:B7, normally considered a microbe of pathogenic potential within the host, may help us fend off malaria infection. This was the first study of its kind to demonstrate a beneficial effect of what is normally considered a pathogenic ‘germ’ on malaria infection.

(click image to enlarge)

Screen%20Shot%202015-05-30%20at%2011_34_19%20AM

Click to view the entire PDF

In the new study, Yilmaz and colleagues found that both the E. coli and malaria parasite (Plasmodium sporozites) exhibit the sugar-containing molecule glycan  Gala1-3Galb1-4GlcNAc-R (a-gal) on their surface, which is not present in humans due to the inactivation of the gene (a1,3GT ) which has been estimated to have occurred in our pre-human ancestors about 28 million years ago.[7]  This genetic deletion prevents the body from unintentionally forming autoantibodies against itself, as human are no longer capable of expressing this glycan on cell surfaces. In fact, because of this mutation the human immune system is capable of producing up to 5% of all of its circulating immunoglobulin IgM and IgG against this particular glycan.[8]

Why is this important?

Yilmaz et al observed several important phenomena that together indicate this E. coli strain (and by implication perhaps other commensal bacteria) in our gut may prime the immune system to produce anti-glycan antibodies that protect against malaria. They came to this conclusion through the following observations, summarized by a recent review of their work titled, “Coming soon: probiotics-based malaria vaccines“:

  • Higher anti-a-gal antibodies are correlated to lower incidence of malaria infection: “As Yilmaz et al. [7] demonstrated in their study, individuals in malaria-endemic Mali exhibit twice the levels of anti-a-gal IgM antibodies compared to adults with no previous malaria exposure. Levels were in general higher in non-infected individuals, indicating that the high titers of a-gal antibodies protect these individuals from being infected by the malaria parasite.”
  • Mice engineered to be deficient in the glycan-producing 1,3 GT gene (like humans) produce protective anti-a-gal antibodies following exposure to E. coli 086:B7 or vaccination with a-gal antigen: “The most interesting discovery of the authors was the demonstration that ‘human-like’ a1,3GT-deficient mice produce anti-a-gal antibodies following enteric exposures to E. coli O86:B7 or immunization with a-gal antigen and that these antibodies protected the mice against Plasmodium berghei infection by Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes.”
  • Anti-a-gal antibodies bind to the parasite surface and activate classical complement pathway of the immune system within the skin: “Yilmaz and colleagues then dissected the mode of action of the anti-a-gal antibodies during malaria transmission from the mosquito to the human. The antibodies were shown to bind to the sporozoite surface and here induced the classical pathway of complement, resulting in lysis of the sporozoites. Due to the fact that following the mosquito bite sporozoite RNA was detectable in the mouse skin, but not the liver, the initial deposition of the parasites in the skin appears to be the target for complement-mediated destruction.”
  • A-gal antibodies produced as a result of gut microbe exposure are able to protect against malarial infection of the skin: “[E]xisting a-gal antibodies, originally generated by the host in response to a-gal-presenting gut microbes, are able to target Plasmodium sporozoites once the mosquito injects them into the skin, resulting in complement-mediated destruction of the parasite (Figure 1).”

While Yilmaz et al focused on the a-gal glycan as a potential vaccine target to protect against malaria infection and transmission, the review pointed out another implication: “the most innovative aspect of the study is the potential use of human gut bacteria as probiotics to protect humans from contracting malaria.” The review proposed:

 “In regard to malaria prevention measures this can be achieved by the use of probiotics containing a-gal producing bacteria as dietary supplements to protect from malaria infection, particularly children who are the most vulnerable group. Antimalarial probiotics in theory would have the advantages of long-term efficacy and low production costs. However, much effort is needed to determine composition and administrative doses of such probiotics as well as the antimalarial effect and tolerance of probiotic vaccines for humans.”

Antimalarial Probiotics?

A probiotic vaccine? In other words, certain commensal bacteria formerly believed to be either harmless or pathogenic may induce protective antibodies in a manner that is far more effective than conventional vaccines, the latter of which cannot effectively reproduce or replace immunological processes that have taken millions of years to evolve within the metaorganism that we are (our cells + the trillions of microbes that together constitute us). In the case of malaria, this is all the more compelling, since no such vaccine has been found after six decades of investigation; a time span within which millions of people have died or been severely debilitated because of a lack of available conventional treatments.

Incidentally, this is not the first study to find probiotic bacteria may help fight malaria. A 2006 study titled, “Lactobacillus casei ssp. rhamnosus enhances non specific protection against Plasmodium chabaudiAS in mice“, found that the  well-known probiotic strain Lactobacillus casei exhibited potent anti-malarial activity in the mouse experimental model of infection, indicating that there are a variety of bacterial strains in the gut that could be utilized to support produce probiotic-mediated immunization alternatives to vaccination.

Moreover, considering that the hundreds of millions of dollars invested in finding drug and vaccine solutions to malaria have yet to produce compelling results, it should be noted that probiotics are not the only ‘natural alternatives’ that show promise. Others include:

1.     Lime Juice: A 2011 human study found that lime juice greatly increased malarial clearance when combined with standard drug therapy. [9]They concluded: “lime juice when used with the appropriate antimalarial may enhance malaria parasite clearance especially in those with uncomplicated malaria.” Lime juice, in fact, may help combat a wide range of life-threatening diseases.

2.     Turmeric (Curcumin): There are at least 8 studies in the medical literature demonstrating the value of the primary polyphenol in turmeric known as curcumin in combatting malaria and/or reducing the adverse effects of conventional antimalarial drugs. View the studies here.

3.     Breastmilk: Natural’s original, first source of immunization is breast milk. A 2000 study found vitro growth inhibition of P. falciparum by maternal and infant sera, suggesting “a protective in vivo role for breastmilk in the possible modulation of malaria frequency, severity and complications.”[10]

For more research on natural/integrative anti-malarial interventions, take a look at our research page on the topic which includes preliminary research on over two dozen natural substances of potential value in the cause to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with malaria infection.

References

[1] http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/366/1579/2806

[2] Moran M, Guzman J, Ropars A, Jorgensen M, McDonald A, Potter S, Haile-Selassie H. The malaria product pipeline: planning for the future. London, UK: The George Institute for International Health; 2007.

[3] World Health Organization (2013) World Malaria Report. Geneva, Switzerland. http://www.who.int/malaria/publications/world_malaria_ report_2013/wmr2013_no_profiles.pdf

[4] Gamma-globulin and acquired immunity to human malaria. COHEN S, McGREGOR IA, CARRINGTON S Nature. 1961 Nov 25; 192():733-7.

[5] Antibodies that protect humans against Plasmodium falciparum blood stages do not on their own inhibit parasite growth and invasion in vitro, but act in cooperation with monocytes. Bouharoun-Tayoun H, Attanath P, Sabchareon A, Chongsuphajaisiddhi T, Druilhe PJ Exp Med. 1990 Dec 1; 172(6):1633-41.

[6] Yilmaz, B. et al. (2014) Gut microbiota elicits a protective immune response against malaria transmission. Cell 159, 1277–1289 8 Galili, U. and Swanson, K. (1991) Gene sequences suggest inacti

[7] Galili, U. and Swanson, K. (1991) Gene sequences suggest inactivation of alpha-1,3-galactosyltransferase in catarrhines after the divergence of apes from monkeys. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88, 7401–7404

[8] Macher, B.A. and Galili, U. (2008) The Galalpha1,3Galbeta1,4GlcNAcR (alpha-Gal) epitope: a carbohydrate of unique evolution and clinical relevance. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1780, 75–8

[9] S A Adegoke, O A Oyelami, O S Olatunya, L A Adeyemi. Effects of lime juice on malaria parasite clearance. Phytother Res. 2011 Oct ;25(10):1547-50. Epub 2011 Mar 17. PMID:21413089

[10] O O Kassim, K A Ako-Anai, S E Torimiro, G P Hollowell, V C Okoye, S K Martin. Inhibitory factors in breastmilk, maternal and infant sera against in vitro growth of Plasmodium falciparum malaria parasite. J Trop Pediatr. 2000 Apr;46(2):92-6. PMID: 10822935


Article Contributed by Sayer Ji, Founder of GreenMedInfo.com.

Sayer Ji is an author, researcher, lecturer, and advisory board member of the National Health Federation. He founded Greenmedinfo.com in 2008 in order to provide the world an open access, evidence-based resource supporting natural and integrative modalities. It is internationally recognized as the largest and most widely referenced health resource of its kind.

California Democrats Obliterate Patients’ Rights, Vote To Eliminate Informed Consent

California’s-SB277-Eliminates-Vaccine-Exemptions-And-Destroys-Personal-Beliefs
By: Justice Gazette |

Amidst a weekend of protests from concerned parents demanding Democrats revert to their claimed values of freedom and human rights, the California Democratic Central Committee took a long fall from human rights, voting for a resolution eliminating a patient’s right of informed consent to a medical procedure.

Under the pretense of protecting children from a non-existent health crisis, the California Democratic Party voted to mandate an unspecified number of vaccines and to eliminate the right of personal exemptions, which in the case of vaccines is synonymous with informed consent.  The resolution was part of a top-down orchestrated strategy to get party insiders to provide the appearance of popular support for California State Senator Richard Pan’s SB 277, eliminating personal and religious exemptions for vaccines for school children.  The resolution, which was not age-related, did not name the mandated vaccines but referenced a legally-required list that could change with the whim of the legislature. With over 270 new vaccines approaching approval, this resolution could easily promote a mandate of over 300 vaccines that all students (of all ages) in the jurisdiction of California or California students in other jurisdictions would be forced to be injected with — no information nor consent necessary.  Since Big Pharma has been completely exempted from liability for deaths or injuries their vaccines cause, there is no incentive for them to make a safe vaccine.

If SB 277 matched the resolution in its incusion of all students, then adult students taking even a single class anywhere in the State of California (or Californian’s taking an out-of-state class) would have to roll up their sleeves and submit to an extensive number of vaccines  with no option to refuse.  Some professions require continuing education.   Attorneys are required to take 24 hours of continuing educaition every three years. The fact that Pan showed up to speak for this resolution may be an indication of where his future legislation will lead.  Lawsuits over the current version of SB 277 are already in the planning stages.  So perhaps the approximately 183,000 active members of the legal profession who don’t want to become human pin cushions have already seen the handwriting on Dr. Pan’s wall.

Parents of hundreds of vaccine injured or killed children showed up to the convention May 15th and 16th, only to be greeted by insults and verbal attacks from delegates who treated concerned Democratic parents as the enemy.  In reaction to these parents, the party put up a showing of being cold, callous and uncaring about harm caused by its removal of informed consent.  Tens of millions of dollars have been poured into this legislation and Democrats have a lot of money riding on pushing through this removal of informed consent.  To those pushing the resolution and legislation, sick or dead kids appeared to be an inconvenience to be denied out of existence.  Democrats flatly refused to look at evidence of the serious harm caused by the vaccines. Many spouted mantras about studies that had already been declared false by Dr. William Thompson, the lead scientist who was part of the team that reportedly was forced to falsify those very studies.

John Hanna

John Hanna

John Hanna, the resolutions chairman and a Wall Street proponent, ran the resolutions portion of the convention meeting.  Eleven resolutions had been prioritized for the Convention calendar.  Resolution 15-05.15, “Resolution in Support of Repealing California’s Personal Beliefs Exemption to Mandatory Vaccinations,” which seeks to eliminate the right of informed consent with respect to this medical procedure,  was pulled from the approval calendar for the purpose of opposing it by delegates Ruth Hull and Noelle Foster.  Noelle Foster had immune-compromised children whose very lives were in danger if they were forced to receive the vaccine.  So for Noelle, the resolution took away not only her children’s right to refuse medical treatment but also their very right to live since schooling is mandated and the resolution had no exception for homeschooling.  The resolution was seconded by Democratic delegate/Registered Nurse Donna Macris, a longtime advocate for a patient’s right of informed consent.

Senator Pan

Senator Pan

California Democratic Party Controller Hillary Crosby and SB 277 author State Senator Richard Pan spoke for the resolution. Delegates cannot recall any past resolution ever failing when a Democratic elected official spoke for that resolution. In most past instances, only a few delegates have dared stand up against resolutions personally promoted by legislators. The Pharmaceutical lobbyists had a booth in the convention hall.  There was a lot of money on the line.  According to Robert Kennedy, the Pharmaceutical lobby spends more money promoting their bills than any other lobby, including oil and gas and defense.  According to Kennedy, this bill is very important to the Pharmaceutical Lobby and the legislators they sponsor as passage of SB 277 will dramatically increase the net assets of Pharmaceutical corporations.  So passage of the resolution by a unanimous or near-unanimous majority was viewed as a certainty.

In opposing the resolution, Ruth Hull stated that she stood with Robert F. Kennedy, Dr. William Thompson and millions of voting Democratic activists for patients’ rights who were now fighting to retain the right of informed consent. After speaking of the importance of the right of informed consent with respect to medical procedures, she noted that Hepatitis B, which is on the SB 277 mandated list, is a condition resulting from sex.   Note, this Gazette has covered cases of courts knowingly turning over young children to pedophiles.  Forcing babies and young children to receive a sex vaccine fits with the failure of California leaders to take action to protect the state’s children from sexual abuse.

R.N. Donna Macris, spoke to the Democratic value of freedom and how removing the right to informed consent was counter to the fundamental principles of the Democratic Party.  She spoke of the vaccine injured children and told of the medical realities of the harm that vaccines cause to children.  What the speakers did was to give a voice to the concerns of parents and opponents that was otherwise lacking in Democratic insider circles.

The opposition was much stronger than expected.  Instead of just a few daring to vote against Senator Pan, roughly 30 to 40% of the delegates joined with the opponents in voting “Nay” to the resolution.  Though this was an unprecedented and significant showing against a resolution pushed by an elected official on the floor of the convention, the result was still tragic for Democratic delegate Noelle Foster, who like many other parents has to worry about whether the state is mandating a procedure that could take away the life of her children.  A couple of delegates remarked, “How can the party be so heartless.”  Several Democrats spoke of plans to leave the party as a direct result of what they considered a callous disregard for children’s lives with respect to SB 277 and this resolution.

There have been predictions that SB 277 could end the reign of Democrats in California.  Grass roots Democrats are largely disgusted with their Party’s failure to stand for human values over money from lobbyists.   A low turnout of Democrats in 2016, coupled with a high turnout of angry voters backing a referendum to repeal SB 277, should it become law, could result in a Republican take-over of California, according to several political analysts.  SB 277 is not yet law.  In the end, Jerry Brown could save his party by vetoing the bill or adding  a provision for informed consent in the form of a personal and religious exemption back into the law.

Original article: http://www.justicegazette.org/democrats-eliminate-informed-consent.html

The Feds New Mandatory Vaccination Bill Before Congress

Congresswoman Frederica S Wilson (D-FL-24) introduced HR2232, The Vaccinate All Children Act of 2015
By: Catherine J. Frompovich | Activist Post

Vaccines are called shots, and some kill.

Here’s where vaccine/vaccination issues and problems in the USA become ratcheted up to a fever pitch. May 1st, 2015 Congresswoman Frederica S Wilson (D-FL-24) introduced HR2232, The Vaccinate All Children Act of 2015

To amend the Public Health Service Act to condition receipt by States (and political subdivisions and public entities of States) of preventive health services grants on the establishment of a State requirement for students in public elementary and secondary schools to be vaccinated in accordance with the recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, and for other purposes. [1]

It’s been referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce. The bill’s language basically does away with all exemptions except a medical exemption using this language:

(A) certifying that the physician has personally examined the student during the preceding 12 months; and

(B) certifying that, in the physician’s opinion, the physical condition of the student is such that the student’s health would be endangered by the vaccination involved; and

(C) demonstrating (to the satisfaction of the individual in charge of the health program at the student’s school) that the physician’s opinion conforms to the accepted standard of medical care.

Note that “C” indicates students’ schools will be the determining ‘authority’ as [“to the satisfaction of the individual in charge of the health program at the student’s school”] regarding a child’s health / vaccine status, not the child’s parents! Parents, what do you have to say about that?

Since HR2232 basically provides funding to public schools based – and dependent – upon vaccination records, schools, in essence, will be the “keeper of the keys” regarding children. That, no doubt, is tantamount to forfeiture of children over to the state education system—something that reminds one of what happened in Russia under Stalin and the infamous “Children’s World.” [2]

Members of Congress and all parents need to wonder if such proposed legislation as HR2232 could become a prelude to what happened under Stalin:

Of course, millions could not escape Stalin’s Great Terror. Included among those affected by the purges were hundreds of thousands of children whose parents disappeared into the bowels of Lubyanka. Made orphans by the state, these children of “enemies of the people” became wards of the state. The lucky were taken in by brave relatives or merely dispatched to “children’s homes” (detdomy / детдомы); the less fortunate were swept up into the network of children’s prison labor camps that had emerged in the the mid 1930s. [2]

I offer that HR2232 is the slipperiest of all slopes heading in the direction of everything un-American, un-Constitutional and definitely posturing drumbeats of totalitarianism, which is defined as

a political system in which the state holds total authority over the society and seeks to control all aspects of public and private life wherever possible. [3]

[CJF emphasis added]

Either Congresswoman Wilson’s American dream has turned into a nightmare affecting everyone or she’s been visited by too many Big Pharma lobbyists. If ever there were a proposed piece of legislation that needs to be opposed, HR2232 is it!

Instead of HR2232, there is legislation that definitely needs to be introduced:

  1. Make the U.S. CDC/FDA responsible for performing safety tests, independent of Big Pharma and vaccine manufacturers, confirming all vaccines are guaranteed not to cause cancer or birth defects or impede fertility and prevent reproduction.
  2. Prohibit vaccines from containing Thimerosal [49.6% ethylmercury], aluminum in any of 4 formulations, formaldehyde, plus other toxic and cancer-causing chemicals or neurotoxins during any stage of vaccine manufacture.
  3. Prohibit Big Pharma from gifting members of Congress political campaigns.

Just in case readers need a reminder about what’s at stake with vaccines, and forced vaccinations, the folks at Vaccine Liberation Army created a public service PowerPoint presentation that drives home serious issues that federal and state health agencies constantly push under a “consensus rug” or as coincidental.

vaccines lie
Slide 30 points out something very interesting—and even factual about vaccines; the information is taken from none other than St Jude’s Children’s Research Hospital “Inpatient Visiting Guidelines.” [4] Here’s what St Jude’s has to say:

For an immune-suppressed child, the risk of infection from a live, attenuated virus vaccine is small compared to the risk of infection from exposure to someone with a vaccine-preventable disease. It is still recommended for your immune suppressed child:

  • To avoid contact with a person who has a rash after recently receiving the chickenpox (varicella) vaccine.

  • To avoid contact with a person who has received an intranasal flu vaccine within one week. This applies only if your child is severely immune suppressed, such as in the hospital after a recent bone marrow transplant. There is no similar risk with the inactivated, injectable flu vaccine.

  • If a household contact (infant) has recently received rotavirus vaccination, all family members should wash their hands thoroughly and frequently after contact with the vaccinated infant, especially when changing diapers.

  •           Household contacts should not receive the oral polio vaccine. Note that the oral polio vaccine is not used in the United States. [4]

What does that tell you? It says unequivocally that recently vaccinated individuals can spread the very diseases they have been vaccinated against! So, if vaccines were so ‘safe’ and ‘fool-proof’, why should parents be concerned about unvaccinated children? It’s the vaccinated who are spreading diseases and also contracting the very diseases for which they have been vaccinated. Here’s some interesting spin about whooping cough, which readers may find somewhat amusing for its apparent attempt at ‘circular’ logic. Wikipedia defines circular logic as “a logical fallacy in which the reasoner begins with what they are trying to end with.”

On slide 11 we see every parent’s worst nightmare: a vaccine-induced adverse event. The photograph below is that of Ian Gromowski. This poor child died at 47 days old, never having left the hospital after a severe reaction to his Hepatitis B shot—a vaccine that is medically unnecessary unless the birth mother tested positive for Hepatitis B, in my opinion. Hepatitis B is contracted via dirty street drugs needles and sexual activity!

vaccine damage
The USA has now reached what Dr. Benjamin Rush, MD, a signer of the Declaration of Independence, feared when he said, “The Constitution of this Republic should make special provision for medical freedom. To restrict the art of healing to one class will constitute the Bastille [famous French prison in 1700s] of medical science. All such laws are un-American and despotic.”

Congresswoman Wilson’s HR2232 seems to fit that definition.

References:

[1] https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/2232/text
[2] http://scottwpalmer.com/stalinism/blog/childrens-world
[3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Totalitarianism
[4] http://www.stjude.org/stjude

Resource:

As whooping cough grows, study finds vaccine wanes
http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/health/as-whooping-cough-grows-study-finds-vaccine-wanes/

originally appeared at Activist Post

Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.

Catherine’s latest book, published October 4, 2013, is Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, available on Amazon.com.

Her 2012 book A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective & Non-Toxic Treatments, is available on Amazon.com and as a Kindle eBook.

Two of Catherine’s more recent books on Amazon.com are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009) and Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008)

The Most Dangerous Vaccine (VIDEO)

hpv-vaccine

On this week’s Real Politik James speaks with Norma Erickson, president of Sanevax Inc. Founded in 2010, Sanevax is an international clearinghouse of information and advocacy concerning one of big pharma’s most corrupt and dangerous profit-generating schemes: the HPV vaccine. Amazingly, the HPV vaccine is recommended by several governments as a preventative to cervical cancer. Yet there is no evidence that HPV is in any way related to such cancer. At the same time the pharmaceutical company’s own studies indicate that 2.5% of women who receive the vaccine–that’s 2,500 for every 100,000–will have one or more adverse reactions. Such figures are corroborated by the number of adverse reactions reported to the Centers for Disease Control since the mid-2000s when Gardasil hit the market.

Sanevax presently has affiliates in over 30 countries, and has been especially influential in educating the public on the HPV vaccine’s dangers while acting as a conduit for medical professionals and policy makers to challenge the pharmaceutical industry’s increased control over official vaccination programs.

Interview Highlights

Norma Erickson began to research the HPV vaccine as an investigative writer. Her findings led her to the establishment of Sanevax. “The Sanevax team and all of the people that we work with strongly believe that vaccines should scientifically proven to meet four common sense criteria: They should be scientifically proven safe, affordable, necessary and effective prior to their inclusion in any mass vaccination program. We work with doctors, attorneys, scientists, health advocates, injured girls and their families, and handle most anything having to do with the HPV vaccine controversy.”

Sanevax has succeeded in prompting or facilitating policy reforms in several countries concerning the HPV vaccine, yet United States regulators are among the most impervious to information contradicting data they are fed by major pharmaceutical companies. “Probably the first thing we started working on was the discovery of contamination in the Gardasil vaccine,” she notes.

Dr. Sing Hang Lee agreed to test a vial of Gardasil for us because an individual in Canada reported that her daughter had tested positive for HPV in her blood two years after innoculation. This same girl had been diagnosed with rhematoid arthritis 24 hours after her second injection. I knew from my research and speaking with experts that HPV did not remain in the bloodstream for more than 48 hours–at least natural HPV viruses didn’t. The immune system took care of them within that period of time.

We kept researching and researching, talked to Dr. Lee, and we came to the conclusion that we had to rule out the Gardasil vaccine because it had been advertised, promoted, and approved in every country around the world based on the fact that it had no viral DNA in it. So, we felt obligated to rule it out for this parent. [Dr. Lee] tested that first vial, and sure enough there it was: recombinant HPV DNA in Gardasil. We immediately informed the FDA. They brushed it off, changed their website, and indicated that it was no health problem whatsoever. It was a natural part of the manufacturing process.

Merck is releasing a new HPV vaccine despite the fact that the number of vaccine injuries attributable to Gardasil and reported to the CDC’s own Vaccine Adverse Reaction Reporting System have skyrocketed since its introduction in 2006. “As a kind of indication of what one can expect, Merck just got Gardasil 9 approved. During the clinical trials for Gardasil 9 they used Gardasil as the control solution. Normal people would say placebo. (A placebo is an inactive solution.) They used Gardasil during that time and because they had not conducted the safety trials for any great length on Gardasil the FDA required that they follow these girls throughout the course of the study, which was three years. Their new package insert indicates that the serious adverse event rate was 2.5% for Gardasil and 2.3% for Gardasil 9. Now that doesn’t sound like a whole lot until you translate that in to per 100,000 recipients.”

With the above in mind, among Sanevax’s most disturbing observations is the fact that the cervical cancer rate per 100,000 females is far surpassed by the rate of adverse reactions attributable to the HPV vaccine–as evidenced in the manufacturers’ own studies. “When you look at cervical cancer statistics they’re always quoted as x number per 100,000. In the United States there are approximately 12 diagnoses of cervical cancer per year per 100,000 people. If you innoculate that same 100,000 with Gardasil, for instance, you can expect 2,500 adverse events. I can’t see how anyone in their right mind would say that’s a logical tradeoff to avoid 12 cervical cancer diagnoses.”

Further, there is no confirmed link between HPV and cancer. “HPV is associated with cervical cancer. It has never been proven to cause cervical cancer or any other kind of cancer in and of itself,” Erickson explains. “In fact, there’s some very good scientific evidence that’s just been released recently that indicates it may not cause cancer at all.”

Sanevax has produced and participated in the creation of several documentaries highlighting the dangers of the HPV vaccine, many of which highlight how young lives can be destroyed after administration of the HPV vaccine. For example, it brought US high schooler Gabi Swank to the attention of The Greater Good‘s producers following Swank’s extreme adverse reaction linked to Gardasil. Such stories are especially tragic because they involve adolescent girls  stricken with terminally debilitating mental, emotional and physical conditions just as they are about to enter womanhood.

I’m working on a story now that’s going to be published on our website where a girl in Ireland was administered the vaccine in a school program … This was according to her father. She had an adverse reaction straight away. For over an hour she was left lying on a mat on the floor while the rest of the girls were being vaccinated. During this time she had seizure-like jerking, rolling eyes, blurred vision, headache, nausea, etc. That was only the beginning of their journey. The parents were called to the school to pick her up and they were told that they were overreacting when they asked why an ambulance wasn’t called, and that all of these symptoms would wear off. Now, six months later, the little girl is still suffering those symptoms and more.

We have had reports of spontaneous abortions, still births, miscarriages, adrenal failure, severe anxiety and panic attacks, autistic-like symptoms, the whole gamut of auto-immune disorders. There are 70 or 80 recognized autoimmune disorders, and these girls are coming up with any and all of them.


Professor James F. Tracy is an Associate Professor of Media Studies at Florida Atlantic University. James Tracy’s work on media history, politics and culture has appeared in a wide variety of academic journals, edited volumes, and alternative news and opinion outlets. James is editor of Union for Democratic Communication’s Journal Democratic Communiqué and a contributor to Project Censored’s forthcoming publication Censored 2013: The Top Censored Stories and Media Analysis of 2011-2012. Additional writings and information are accessible at memoryholeblog.com.

Welcome To GMO Australia And Vaccine Australia

Recently the Lucky Country down under has become GMO Australia and Vaccine Australia, with decisions by the Government to favor Big Biotech and Big Pharma.

Recently the Lucky Country down under has become GMO Australia and Vaccine Australia, with decisions by the Government to favor Big Biotech and Big Pharma.

Welcome to GMO Australia! While you’re there, welcome to Vaccine Australia too!

Australia, a Western democratic nation with a very high standard of living, prides itself on being “the lucky country”, on giving people a “fair go” and above all being free. Those ideals, however, need to be seriously called into question after recent events down under which have shown the shocking extent to which Australia is being controlled and overrun by corporate interests, especially those pushing GMOs (Big Biotech companies such as Monsanto, Syngenta, Dow, DuPont, BASF and Bayer) and vaccines (Big Pharma companies such as GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson and Johnson, Merck, Pfizer, Eli Lily, Bayer, Novartis, Sanofi, Roche, etc.). Such events make you wonder whether Australia is going to become GMO Australia” or Vaccine Australia” and what is going to happen to the standard of living for Australian citizens, if the nation continues to go down a path of condoning genetic contamination and ushering in mandatory vaccination.

GMO Australia

The recent case between 2 Australian farmers in Western Australia has garnered international attention. Steve Marsh and Michael Baxter had been friends since their school days, and both went into farming. Baxter decided to grow GMO canola which, inevitably as GM crops do, blew into Marsh’s field, which was certified organic. The resulting genetic contamination of his crops meant that Marsh was stripped of his certification, and thus his livelihood and income. The case has caused a huge division in Australia, and recently, in an atrociously corporate decision, the judge ruled that Marsh was to pay Baxter for his losses.

Baxter, by the way, was being funded by Monsanto, who was forced to admit that it financially supported his legal defense. This gives you an idea of how desperate Big Biotech is to influence the laws and judges’ decisions all over the world. Monsanto is prepared to pay out big bucks to ensure GMO Australia exists.

Yes, it is sad that this case has divided the community so much, but the implications go beyond that. What this effectively means is that anyone not using GM seeds is vulnerable and susceptible to getting their organic crops contaminated – and then sued on top of it! Organic farmers don’t even want GM seeds in their fields. Since there is no real way to stop open-air pollination and genetic contamination, how is this not in effect a takeover of the world’s food supply by Big Biotech?

The right to grow your own food is an inherent human right. Food and seeds are part of the common wealth of humanity. Yet, as common sense as these 2 statements are, insane judges and greedy corporations have distorted these basic principles. Genetic contamination is the unavoidable consequence of GMOs – and probably their ultimate purpose too. It does not bode well for the future of food in Australia or on Earth.

Vaccine Australia

Vaccine Australia is in full swing. Australia made international headlines a few days ago with its decision to legally ban religious exemptions for vaccinations. In essence, the Australian Government is declaring that medically, it knows best when it comes to health and medicine, and legally, that it has the right to tell you what to put in your body, which means it thinks it owns your body. This is an absolute disgrace and an outrage. Let us remember that governments are created to protect the rights of their citizens; that is their sole purpose. They are only ever representative of The People, in whom the ultimate power in any society rests. Governments are servants, not masters; they are created by The People and, equally, can be dissolved by The People.
The Aussie Government is trying to boost the immunization rate, so in addition to removing religious exemptions, it is also bribing (“incentivizing”) doctors to inject more of their patients, as well as financially punishing people by tightening up welfare eligibility for parents who fail to vaccinate their children!
So in a sense medical fascism has come to Australia – before it came to the US. There have been various bills put forth in America to try to remove philosophical and religious exemptions from vaccines, such as in California, but at this stage Americans have still not been forced to submit to vaccines. Now, the Australian Government has beat the US to it in terms of medical fascism and is trying to claim it has the supposed authority to inject you with a syringe containing a virus grown in animal cells, and full of dangerous adjuvants – deadly carcinogens like mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde and MSG, and of harmful substances such as human diploid cells (aborted fetal tissue), antibiotics, allergens and GMOs.

Western Medicine Violating its Own Code of Ethics

Of course, the father of modern allopathic medicine, Hippocrates, would be rolling in his grave if he caught wind of this latest stunt by the Australian Government. Mandating that people be forced to accept certain medications, even if they were the healthiest medicine on Earth with zero side effects, goes against the very code of ethics that doctors have sworn to uphold, as well as the Hippocratic oath, which urges doctors to ensure they don’t hurt the patient. Western medicine is supposed to require informed consent; now Australia is eliminating any requirement for consent, informed or not.
Here is an excerpt from the Hippocratic Oath:
“With regard to healing the sick, I will devise and order for them the best diet, according to my judgment and means; and I will take care that they suffer no hurt or damage. Nor shall any man’s entreaty prevail upon me to administer poison to anyone; neither will I counsel any man to do so.”
Here is an excerpt from the Australian Medical Association’s Code of Ethics:
“Approach health care as a collaboration between doctor and patient.”
How exactly is mandatory vaccination a “collaboration”?

Australia Also Eliminating Right to Free Speech Around Vaccines

All this goes to show that Big Pharma must have a mighty tight grip on the reins of power in Canberra. It was only a few months ago that Dr. Sherri Tenpenny had her travel visa denied by the Australian authorities on flimsy grounds. Tenpenny, a world acclaimed expert on the dangers of vaccines, was planning to give a few presentations on the topic. In an appalling act of fear, the Australian Government decided that it no longer cared about the inherent human right to free speech, and decided to shut Tenpenny out, lest her “dangerous” message of truth about vaccines reach the ears of too many Australians, who, armed with a bit more knowledge, might just reject the whole notion that vaccination is a good idea. Welcome to Vaccine Australia.

Australia: Forging Ahead with the New World Order?

In addition to becoming Vaccine Australia and GMO Australia, the island nation has also been accelerating the NWO (New World Order) agenda in other ways, such as increasing domestic surveillance and suppressing basic human rights to privacy – all in the name of fighting terrorism. In September 2014, the Abbott Government passed a draconian piece of anti-terror legislation which capitalized on people’s fears after the “Sydney Siege”. Yes, Australia is well and truly on the bandwagon of governments that exploit the fake “War on Terror” to grab more control over their populace. According to the SMH, this new bill allows Aussie spies to “monitor the entire Australian internet with just one warrant”. It also means that “journalists and whistleblowers will face up to 10 years’ jail for disclosing classified information.”

North or South, East or West: The Conspiracy is Unfolding Worldwide

At this stage in the game, it’s an illusion to think you can outrun the global conspiracy or hide from the NWO. It’s being rolled out on a planetary scale, and although the US is playing a leading role in helping the elite Controllers form a Global Fascist Dictatorship, other aspects of their nefarious agenda are being put into place in other nations. Australia is a testing ground for some of the agenda the Controllers simply can’t get pushed yet in places like the US or Britain. Remember gun control in Australia? It was a piece of cake to goad well-intentioned Australians into handing over their guns (especially with another false flag mind controlled shooting [Martin Bryant]), and now the population at large is disarmed, making any Governmental crackdown like martial law much easier. It has also resulted in more crime; as GunFacts.info states, “Australia and England, which have virtually banned gun ownership, have the highest rates of robbery, sexual assault, and assault with force of the top 17 industrialized countries.”

A Message to Australians: Wake Up While You Still Can

I’ll finish by saying this. I was born in Australia, grew up in Australia and still love the place from afar. Australians are great people, warm-hearted, jovial, honest and friendly. However, they can tend to be less politically motivated and involved than others. If that tendency is true, it’s going to have to change – and change fast – if they want to retain whatever freedom they have left in the face of an unscrupulous Government determined to take over control of every aspect of Australian life. It’s going to require awareness and enlightened, non-violent, effective action to roll back GMO Australia and Vaccine Australia, and keep Australia free.

Sources:

http://www.naturalblaze.com/2015/04/monsanto-admits-paying-for-gmo-farmers.html

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/apr/19/vaccination-crackdown-australia-announces-end-to-religious-exemptions

http://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/apr/12/parents-who-refuse-to-vaccinate-children-to-be-denied-childcare-rebates-reports

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hippocratic_Oath

http://www.amsws.org.au/media/docs/images/ama_code_of_ethics.pdf

http://www.naturalnews.com/048278_vaccine_mafia_Australia_Dr_Sherri_Tenpenny.html

http://www.smh.com.au/digital-life/consumer-security/terror-laws-clear-senate-enabling-entire-australian-web-to-be-monitored-and-whistleblowers-to-be-jailed-20140925-10m8ih.html

http://www.gunfacts.info/gun-control-myths/guns-in-other-countries/


Makia Freeman is the editor of The Freedom Articles and senior researcher at ToolsForFreedom.com, writing on many aspects of the global conspiracy, from vaccines to Zionism to false flag operations and more, and also including info on natural health, sovereignty and higher consciousness.

Shakedown Of Unvaccinated Students Begins In Spokane, Washington

vaccinations
By: Eric Blair | Activist Post –

Spokane public schools in Washington state began to audit the vaccine records of students this week to identify those who are not in compliance with the recommended required vaccine schedule.

Once identified, the students will be detained along with their parents to be re-educated about vaccines, as well as to receive free jabs to get in compliance with vaccine schedules.

I wish this was satire.

Presumably, parents will also be provided with the proper waivers to opt out of this medical fascism, but most of those will have to jump through more hoops like getting a ‘health care professional’ to sign the waiver.

According to the Spokesman-Review:

Kids showing up at Spokane public schools on Monday without proof that they’ve had required immunizations or a signed waiver will be pulled out of classrooms.

This is the first time Washington’s law to exclude children from school is being enforced in the region’s largest school district. So far, no other school district has announced plans to take similar steps.

[…]

If parents don’t want their child to have shots for personal, philosophical, medical or religious reasons, they have to file a waiver with the district. All but the religious exemption require the signature of a health care professional, attesting that they’ve described the benefits and risks of immunizations to the parents.

Students who don’t provide proof of immunization or a waiver will be removed from class and their parents called to the school. The district will inform the parents what steps need to be taken and about free immunization clinics being offered this week. (emphasis added)

Nothing in this world is free. Nothing. Except vaccines of course. Oh, they must care about us so much to give us free pharmaceuticals and punish us if we don’t get them.

The government cannot force people to take medication before using public schools that their taxes paid for. That’s insanely tyrannical. Why is this so difficult for people to see?

Australia is attempting to claim this same ownership of their subjects by denying them public services if they don’t comply with vaccine schedules. Forced medication is for the common good, the public’s health, they tell us.

You have no right to your own body or personal health decisions, not if you want to live in a society with the fully vaccinated who are allegedly immune anyway, they tell us.

I wonder what medical procedure will be required next for us to gain permission to participate in society?

I wonder when natural (unmedicated) humans will be banned from society altogether for the common good of the immune-compromised modified humans?


Eric Blair writes and curates news for Activist Post.

Get Vaccinated Or Lose Your Medicaid? (VIDEO)

Flu Vaccine Shortage

A lawsuit has been initiated by a student who claims she was kicked out of the Baker College, Michigan nursing program because she challenged an instructor who gave a lesson that encouraged lying to patients in order to get them vaccinated. Moreover, she claims that the “lying” could take the form of inducing panic or other forms of coercion like threatening the loss of Medicaid. Kenny Valenzuela highlights the details.

 
Experimental Vaccines

Research links:

Baker College instructor told students to threaten patients into vaccinations, lawsuit claims
Hospital Threatens to Seize Custody of Unvaccinated Newborn
Former Nursing Student Sues Baker College, Alleges Instructor Said To Lie About Vaccinations

Millions Of Girls Given Vaccines Secretly Spiked With Sterilization Drugs

vaccine
By: Kimberly Paxton | The Daily Sheeple –

Although some might call it a conspiracy theory, the World Health Organization, UNICEF, and the United Nations have been accused for decades of trying to secretly reduce the world’s population by hiding contraceptives in vaccines that are purported to be for other purposes.

In 1992, during a meeting at the UN headquarters in Geneva, scientists and “women’s health advocates” discussed the use of “fertility regulating vaccines, particularly the anti-Human Chorionic Gonadotropin vaccine. (source)

If you had any doubt in your mind that this was true, doctors at a Catholic hospital in Kenya are out to prove that millions of girls have been tricked into receiving an injection that will render them sterile for years.

Independent laboratory testing has confirmed that a tetanus vaccine given to over 2.3 million young women in Kenya contained the HCG antigen.

HCG was developed by the WHO as a long-term contraceptive. It causes the body to attack a fetus through an antibody response, and can cause spontaneous abortions for 3 years after the woman is injected with the drug.

Dr. Muhame Ngare of Mercy Medical Centre in Nairobi said:

We sent six samples from around Kenya to laboratories in South Africa. They tested positive for the HCG antigen. They were all laced with HCG.

This proved right our worst fears; that this WHO campaign is not about eradicating neonatal tetanus but a well-coordinated forceful population control mass sterilization exercise using a proven fertility regulating vaccine. This evidence was presented to the Ministry of Health before the third round of immunization but was ignored. (source)

Perhaps unsurprisingly, the Kenyan health ministry has denied that this is the case, offering up claims that many women who received the vaccine became pregnant afterwards. But Dr. Ngare (who, incidentally, is pro-vaccine, just not pro-secret-sterilizing-additive) stands firm in his assertion and provides a convincing argument.

Either we are lying or the government is lying. But ask yourself, ‘What reason do the Catholic doctors have for lying?’ The Catholic Church has been here in Kenya providing health care and vaccinating for 100 years for longer than Kenya has existed as a country.

Usually we give a series three shots over two to three years, we give it anyone who comes into the clinic with an open wound, men, women or children. If this is intended to inoculate children in the womb, why give it to girls starting at 15 years? You cannot get married till you are 18.” The usual way to vaccinate children is to wait till they are six weeks old.

The only time tetanus vaccine has been given in five doses is when it is used as a carrier in fertility regulating vaccines laced with the pregnancy hormone, Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG) developed by WHO in 1992. (source)

Hmmm…so why would this vaccine only be given to young, fertile women? Since tetanus is a type of bacterial infection that occurs after a person is wounded with a rusty or dirty object, wouldn’t it stand to reason that this vaccine, if given in the interest of protecting patients from the infection, be given to both genders, and people of a variety of ages? Are girls at the height of fertility somehow more likely to injure themselves in such a way?

The Kenyan government has a glib answer. Apparently, they wish to proactively inoculate babies in the womb against tetanus, which causes 550 deaths per year.

Catholic priests across Kenya are advising their congregants to refuse these vaccinations.


Kimberly Paxton, a staff writer for The Daily Sheeple, is based out of upstate New York. You can follow Kimberly on Facebook and Twitter.

Obama Administration Plotting Adult Vaccination Mandates

mandatory vaccines

By: Alex Newman | The New American

In collaboration with Big Business and special interests, the Obama administration’s Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is plotting a new program to track Americans’ vaccination records, wage a massive propaganda campaign to “encourage” more inoculations, and foist more controversial vaccines on adults against their will. Federal bureaucrats and crony capitalists set to profit from the proposal claim the goal is to improve “public health,” and establishment media outlets have largely parroted that line so far. However, critics of the unconstitutional scheme, formally dubbed the “National Adult Immunization Plan” (NAIP), say the ultimate goal is to forcibly vaccinate all Americans and move toward a radical new healthcare paradigm in which medical “treatment” is delivered at gunpoint.

The controversial plot was cooked up and unveiled by the Obama HHS National Vaccine Advisory Committee during its February meeting. If approved by federal bureaucrats, the executive-branch assault would, among other elements, enlist private businesses, churches, and non-profit organizations in a nationwide campaign to prod Americans into accepting the Obama administration’s perpetually expanding list of “recommended” vaccines. The scheme would also offer doctors and other vaccine providers “incentives” — read taxpayer-funded bribes — to shred patient privacy and feed private medical information into state and federal databases to track those who refuse to comply.

The summary of the “five-year national plan,” as official documents describe it, deliberately uses innocent-sounding language to promote the effort. “The NAIP is intended to facilitate coordinated action by federal and nonfederal partners to protect public health and achieve optimal prevention of infectious diseases and their consequences through vaccination of adults,” it states, adding that ObamaCare implementation offers a “unique opportunity” to be used as leverage. “As a national plan, it will require engagement from a wide range of stakeholders to achieve its full vision.” Those stakeholders include just about everybody except the target: You. As always with “national plans” dreamed up by Big Government and Big Business, though, the devil is really in the details.

Critics and medical professionals are already up in arms. After summarizing the growing torrent of recent Obama administration assaults on liberty, Dr. Lee Hieb, an orthopedic surgeon and past president of the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, said the NAIP scheme was an especially troubling attack on the liberties of Americans. Calling it “a proposal by the orchestrators of Obamacare to forcibly vaccinate all adult Americans,” Hieb also ridiculed the Soviet-sounding “five-year plan” language. But the implications of the latest Obama administration attack on medical liberty and privacy are no joking matter.

“If you Americans do not stand against this, it’s over,” continued Dr. Hieb, author of the new book Surviving the Medical Meltdown: Your Guide to Living Through the Disaster of Obamacare. “What liberty do you have if the federal government can force you to have a medical procedure, can force you to surrender your very body to their control? Answer: none. Because there is nothing that cannot be justified on the basis of ‘the good of society.’ The Jewish Holocaust, the Great Leap Forward, the killing of the Kulaks, American Eugenics, Tuskegee experimentation, the cold water experiments of Birkenau, Dachau and Auschwitz, all were justified at the time by their respective leaders as for the good of society.”

In the WND column, Dr. Hieb also outlined some of her scientific concerns surrounding vaccination before lambasting the participation of government-selected “stakeholders” — state, local, territorial, and tribal governments; healthcare providers; advocacy groups; vaccine manufacturers; academia and research organizations; payers and health plans; employers; the military; and the general public. The “real stakeholder,” she said, “is you.” “No one cares more about the risks versus benefits of vaccination than you do personally,” Dr. Hieb concluded. “To leave it to a group, to treat you as a member of a group for medical care, is not ethical medicine. It is the stuff of jails and forced labor camps and socialist hellholes — and apparently American academia and bureaucrats. It is time to say no.”

Other experts and advocates for medical freedom were similarly outraged by the Obama administration’s adult-vaccination scheme. In a widely reprinted scathing report outlining the plan, Executive Director Theresa Wrangham with the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) urged citizens to fight back immediately. “There is no time to waste,” she wrote, citing a broad array of threats stemming from the HHS vaccine plot. From unconstitutionally invading Americans’ medical privacy to efforts at mandating adult vaccination and quashing informed-consent ethics in medicine, Wrangham said the plan is dangerous and must be opposed.

“The NAIP makes it clear that in the future, all American adults will be informed of the recommended adult schedule at every possible opportunity outside the healthcare provider domain,” explained Wrangham at the NVIC, a non-profit organization that supports informed consent and individual liberty. “You will be encouraged to comply with the adult schedule not only by your healthcare provider, but also via community-based partnerships to ensure that you have the opportunity to roll up your sleeve at work, school, church and other community gatherings.” The vaccine tracking databases being developed and already in existence, she added, “will be used to identify non-compliers.”

While the NVIC supports access to vaccines for anyone who wants them, there “is a difference between awareness, access, recommendations and mandates,” Wrangham continued. “In the past, these types of government vaccine use plans do not just seek to increase awareness and access but also make recommendations that foster vaccine mandates without flexible medical, religious and conscientious belief exemptions that align with the informed consent ethic.”

The scheme could eventually result in de facto mandatory vaccination, too. Vaccine mandates typically come from the state level, and the NAIP, technically at least, has no legal authority to make its “recommendations” mandatory. “However, much like the recommendations made by NVAC a few years ago for healthcare workers to receive annual flu shots, these recommendations are likely to result in future de facto vaccine mandates for adults, whether through employer requirements, or actual state laws,” Wrangham added, citing legislation introduced in states across the country this year to further chip away at existing exemptions — religious, medical, philosophical — for mandated childhood vaccines.

According to Wrangham, “there is little doubt that that the NVAC’s latest plan will result in similar actions to force adults to use all federally recommended vaccines.” In fact, as if that were not troubling enough, she also said, citing the work of Dr. Suzanne Humphries, “door-to-door efforts to make everyone comply” — as happened about a century ago — are “a real possibility again in America.” The difference is that this time, Americans could be forced to receive “a lot” of vaccines rather than just one.

“The noose being tightened around the necks of our children is being thrown over the necks of adults as well,” Wrangham said. “The tightening of that noose is growing daily in an attempt to strangle vaccine freedom of choice by eradicating the ethical principle of informed consent.” Blasting the “one-size-fits-all” vaccine schedule promoted by authorities as “very dangerous,” she noted that “the human right to protect bodily integrity and autonomy — the core value of the informed consent ethic — is at stake.” The battle is not between the pro- or anti-vaccine positions, she concluded. Instead, it is about freedom, values, beliefs, and what medical risks individuals are willing to accept. Vaccination just happens to be at the forefront of the battle.

Supporters of the plan, meanwhile, have rallied numerous establishment media outlets to their cause. Last month, for example, the Wall Street Journal ran an article that sounded almost like a press release issued by Obama’s HHS. “It’s Time for Grown-Ups to Get Their Shots,” reads the headline. The subtitle: “Adults have their own vaccination needs, but they’ve often been neglected. Now doctors are trying to correct that.” Those doctors, of course, are working in the federal bureaucracy or in crony companies, and their NAIP plot would, among other schemes, provide federal “incentives” to doctors that push more vaccines on patients. Numerous Big Business and special-interest “stakeholders” set to reap massive, risk-free profits from the federal scheming have also been touting it.

In addition to being a brazen assault on individual liberty, privacy, medical ethics, and the U.S. Constitution, the radical plan also represents the very essence of crony capitalism. The federal government, using non-existent “executive authorities,” is essentially seizing taxpayer funds from citizens to act as a coercive marketing and propaganda agency for hugely profitable Big Pharma companies and vaccine pushers. Adding insult to injury, those same crony capitalists successfully lobbied the federal government to shield them from liability when their products kill and injure consumers — making taxpayers bear the billions of dollars in costs for damages.

Various opponents of the ObamaVaccines plot for adults were urging concerned Americans to submit “public comments” to the federal bureaucrats at HHS begging them not to impose it. The public comment period ended last month, and bureaucrats will meet again in June to “finalize” their plans. A much better solution, though, would be for Congress to defund and abolish all unconstitutional agencies, bureaucracies, departments, and programs. If members of Congress would follow their oath of office, the NAIP and countless other totalitarian-minded schemes would never have even been dreamt up. Americans must stop trying to fight each individual executive-branch assault on liberty and instead go straight to the source: anti-constitutional congressional funding for all the madness.


Alex Newman is a correspondent for The New American, covering economics, education, politics, and more. He can be reached at [email protected] . Follow him on Twitter @ALEXNEWMAN_JOU.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s “No On SB277″ Speech (VIDEO)

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s “No On SB277″ Speech

In this address given on the California Capitol steps in Sacramento Robert Kennedy Jr. provides an inspired and detailed analysis of the extent to which the powerful pharmaceutical cartel has effectively captured the nation’s scientific, regulatory, and law-making processes. Combined with the corporate news media’s dependence on drug advertising, this has put big pharma in a position where it is running roughshod over informed choice and dictating vaccine policies that have little-if-any basis in scientific research yet will greatly contribute to that industry’s already gargantuan profits.

Kennedy offers an example of scientist and pediatrician Paul Offit, the developer of the rotavirus vaccine, whose personal stake in that vaccine’s development and adoption is emblematic of the monied practices tending to corrupt vaccine science in America today. “In 1999 he sat on the [CDC] committee that added the rotavirus vaccine to the schedule.” Kennedy notes,

At the time he was working on his own rotavirus vaccine. Opening that gateway, by adding that vaccine to the schedule, made his patent extremely valuable. Six years later he sold that patent for $182 million and pocketed about $40 million for himself. So, that kind of financial entanglement by the people to who are deciding what vaccines to add to the schedule makes it difficult, I think, for all of us to think that the only thing they’re thinking of is our children’s health. The Inspector General’s report said that 97% of the people who sit on those panels have the same kinds of financial entanglements and conflicts of interest as Paul Offit.

He concluded his remarks by emphasizing that legislation such as California’s SB277 takes away the last barrier between the pharmaceutical companies’ bottom line mentality and children’s health–parental discretion itself.

All of the barriers that are meant to protect our children–the government, the lawyers, the regulatory agencies, and the press, the checks and balances in our democratic system that are supposed to stand between corporate power and our little children–have been removed, and there’s only one barrier left, and that’s the parents, and we need to keep that in the equation.


Professor James F. Tracy is an Associate Professor of Media Studies at Florida Atlantic University. James Tracy’s work on media history, politics and culture has appeared in a wide variety of academic journals, edited volumes, and alternative news and opinion outlets. James is editor of Union for Democratic Communication’s Journal Democratic Communiqué and a contributor to Project Censored’s forthcoming publication Censored 2013: The Top Censored Stories and Media Analysis of 2011-2012. Additional writings and information are accessible at memoryholeblog.com.

Guess What Else Is Put In Vaccines?

The use of Human Diploid Cells (aborted fetal tissue) is common in vaccines, with grave health and ethical ramifications, from autism to cannibalism.

The use of Human Diploid Cells (aborted fetal tissue) is common in vaccines, with grave health and ethical ramifications, from autism to cannibalism.

Aborted fetal tissue, believe it or not, is another one of the horrendous ingredients found in the vaccines of modern Western Medicine and its drug-pushing chemical arm, Big Pharma. I say “modern” Western Medicine yet it is difficult in this case to see how Allopathy lives up to that, given that it engages in a practice of inserting the body tissue of dead babies into the bloodstreams of patients, most of whom have no idea they are being subjected to it. Given the long list of dubious, harmful or outright cancerous adjuvants already used in vaccines, the inclusion of aborted fetal tissue is another reason, an ethical one in addition to all the health ones, why vaccines need to be avoided at all costs.

Aborted Fetal Tissue Called “Human Diploid Cells” on Vaccine Packaging

Big Pharma isn’t going to just come right out and admit it uses dead baby DNA. That would be a disastrous marketing choice. Instead, another Orwellian and euphemistic phrase is adopted: “human diploid cells“. Diploid cells are cells with a double set of chromosomes, meaning from a fetus that already got one set of chromosomes from an egg and one set from a sperm. As I wrote in a previous article “Toxic Vaccine Adjuvants: The Top 10“, these human cells are fetal cells taken from the tissue of babies or fetuses, some of which are definitely aborted! This has being going on for over 50 years. The article Human Fetal Links with Some Vaccines admits that “Two different strains of human diploid cell cultures made from fetuses have been used extensively for vaccine production for decades. One was developed in the United States in 1961 (called WI-38) and the other in the United Kingdom in 1966 (called MRC-5).”

Clint Richardson’s excellent documentary Lethal Injection delves into the issue of aborted diploid cells and offers further research and analysis.

The Connection Between Aborted Fetal Tissue and Autism

Strong and copious evidence is coming to the surface that vaccines are responsible for the rising tide of autism in America (and globally); even judges in Italy have ruled so in their law courts. Dr. Deisher of Sound Choice has studied the subject considerably, and released a study which found a connection between the injection of human diploid cells / aborted fetal tissue and autism. The connection is that when you inject something foreign into your body, your cells will either assimilate it (whereby the foreign human DNA will be transported into nuclei and be integrated into host genome, causing phenotype change) or attack it (meaning you develop an auto-immune response, leading to the auto-immune diseases of the ASD [Autism Spectrum Disorder]). Either way, residual human DNA fragments (aborted fetal tissue) in vaccines can be one of causes of autism. Dr. Deisher’s study concluded:

“Autistic disorder change points years are coincident with introduction of vaccines manufactured using human fetal cell lines, containing fetal and retroviral contaminants, into childhood vaccine regimens. This pattern was repeated in the US, UK, Western Australia and Denmark. Thus, rising autistic disorder prevalence is directly related to vaccines manufactured utilizing human fetal cells.”
It also states on the SoundChoice.org website:

“Autism and other childhood neurodevelopmental diseases such as childhood onset schizophrenia, childhood bipolar disorder and intellectual disability have been associated with hundreds of de novo (new) mutations, most likely caused by the presence of these fragments of fetal DNA and retrovirus in our children’s vaccines.”

Aborted Fetal Tissue and Recombinant Human Albumin

The idea of the human body attacking itself due to autoimmunity is also mentioned in a recent article by S. D. Wells of NaturalNews.com, where she talks about recombinant human albumin. Recombinant means it is has been genetically engineered, i.e. the cells of a host organism have been spliced with other genes. Wells discusses how cows contract mad cow disease: by eating other cows, after which their central nervous system gets compromised. The situation is very analogous to when your blood, via a toxic vaccine, is fed some human albumin (i.e. aborted fetal tissue).

Mad cow disease, more correctly known as bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), is a transmittable disease that affects the nervous systems of cows. The human version of this disease, known as variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (vCJD), is thought to be contracted by consuming beef products that contain parts of an affected animal’s nervous system, such as the spinal cord and brain.” Did you pick up on the word bovine there? Here’s more: “In many cases, the early symptoms of mad cow disease mimic other, more common ailments, making diagnosis difficult. In fact, according to web resources, it is only in the latter stages of the disease that diagnostic testing can accurately pinpoint the abnormalities which positively identify the disease.” Sounds familiar, maybe like ASD — autism spectrum disorder — with some ADHD mixed in, some nervous twitches and chronic care for life.

Aborted Fetal Tissue Also Found in Big Pharma Drugs and Cosmetics

It doesn’t stop at vaccines, however. As it turns out, aborted fetal tissue is also found in Big Pharma drugs and cosmetics, all approved by the FDA. As Sound Choice argues, “Animal cell lines produce vaccines and biologics as economically and effectively as the aborted fetal cell lines.” If that is the case, why is aborted fetal DNA even being used at all?

Is Aborted Fetal Tissue in Vaccines Akin to Cannibalism?

Some may scoff at this question and regard it as absurd, but think about it: isn’t the definition of cannibalism the intake of the flesh, blood or some body part of your own species? How much of a difference is there between eating human tissue or allowing it to be injected straight into your bloodstream? Of course, there are medical emergencies where people need blood or organ transplants and adopt another person’s blood or tissue to survive, but vaccines do not fall into this category.

One entry at Dictionary.com defines cannibalism as “the ceremonial eating of human flesh or parts of the human body for magical or religious purposes, as to acquire the power or skill of a person recently killed” – which is an interesting definition, given the Satanic, black magic background of the New World Order families. Western Medicine is essentially a Rockefeller creation and the Rockefellers are key players, no doubt, in the dark rituals that go on at Bohemian Grove and other sites of the Secret Societies. When you go beyond the medical cover story that it is needed to make an effective vaccine, is the inclusion of aborted fetal tissue in vaccines really an attempt to get the population accustomed to eating its own? Is it just a coincidence that cannibalism has been a beloved practice of the ruling bloodline families for hundreds (if not thousands) of years? Is this really a result of dark forces (i.e. the Archons) trying to form the world in their image and trying to entrain the world into their frequency – one of domination, destruction and death, where might is right and it is acceptable for the strong to exploit the weak, and literally eat them?

It is truly astonishing to think that the use of aborted fetal tissue is a standard practice in Western Medicine; but it’s better to face the truth than live in denial about it.

Sources:

http://soundchoice.org

http://naturalnews.com

http://theflowofperceptions.blogspot.com/2012/05/british-royalty-cannibals.html


Makia Freeman is the editor of The Freedom Articles and senior researcher at ToolsForFreedom.com, writing on many aspects of the global conspiracy, from vaccines to Zionism to false flag operations and more, and also including info on natural health, sovereignty and higher consciousness.

 

Mainstream News Confesses Vaccines Make People Contagious (VIDEO)