Tag Archives: vaccines

Biohacking: Turning Humans Into Cyborgs One Convenient Reason At A Time

transhuman31

(The Real Agenda) You’ll be surprised to know that there is little difference between being human and being a cyborg. In fact, from very young, humans are already transformed into something else than a being of flesh and bone.

Apparently, a cyborg is a human who has been subjected to the intrusion of any foreign body.

One example of this is vaccinations.

After being injected, humans are carriers of attenuated and most often than not, live viruses purported –although never proven– to help the human body create a resistance or immunity against disease.

We now know that vaccinations actually impair the human immune system as they prevent it from naturally developing such resistance or immunity.

After vaccinations came the implantable microchips, which more and more people are now adopting out of convenience.

Opening a door, for example, is much more convenient, chip supporters argue, because people don’t need to carry a key in their pockets. It is simply a matter of waving their hand in front of a radio frequency reader that recognizes the person chip.

Another example is shopping. People’s implantable chip can be linked to financial information which enables them to pay at any store by waving their hand on a radio frequency scanner in order to pay for their purchases.

Pets, passports and even credit cards are now fitted with chips which are linked to a person’s name, address, bank account information, job, social security information, pension fund and so on.

Leaving aside privacy concerns, which many people seem to take for granted despite the very real dangers of being hacked into by consumer RFID readers that anyone can get their hands on, most people who embrace implantable microchips as the next great fad are becoming subjects of technology in the same way in which cell phone users were back in the 80s and 90s. In fact, implantable microchips are the next step after cell phones.

Another way in which microchips are commonly sold is in the medical field. Chips are often pushed as great ways to deliver pharmaceutical drugs into the body. The chips can be controlled remotely from outside the human body to release a dose of the drug that a patient may need at the time he or she needs it. Sounds convenient, doesn’t it?

“The implantable technologies are the technologies of the future,” says Hannes Sjoblad, who promotes implantable chip technology by traveling all over Europe and the United States to show people how easy and simple it is to “be part of the future now”. He says implanting a chip is more useful than carrying keys and other things that people usually forget and lose. “This implant I will never lose it,” he says.

For most people, implanting a chip will be all about unlocking their car or enabling their phones, but the more companies produce the chips and those who will have the capability to trace and hack the chips implanted under people’s skin, it will be all about control.

If hackers are now able to break the code to get into a car’s computer to stop, accelerate and even drive the vehicle, imagine what can malicious hackers can do to chips implanted in humans.

Some doctors and medical researchers are already salivating about the possibility of implanting RFID chips in human brains. In fact, many people argue that these type of experiments have been conducted already.

The question is, where will the search for convenience take people who have little or no understanding of the full consequences of having their bodies hacked after implanting a chip under their skin?


Luis R. Miranda is an award-winning journalist and the founder and editor-in-chief at The Real Agenda. His career spans over 18 years and almost every form of news media. His articles include subjects such as environmentalism, Agenda 21, climate change, geopolitics, globalisation, health, vaccines, food safety, corporate control of governments, immigration and banking cartels, among others. Luis has worked as a news reporter, on-air personality for Live and Live-to-tape news programs. He has also worked as a script writer, producer and co-producer on broadcast news. Read more about Luis.

Former Merck Rep Says Mandatory Vaccination Is For Profit and Not Public Health

brandy vaughan merck rep

Brandy Vaughan is a former sales rep for Merck & Co. – a vaccine maker – and she details how vaccine companies are using vaccines as a vehicle for massive profit and not public health. Brandy researched the safety of vaccines and found that not only do vaccines contain known toxins that can cause neurological damage, but that vaccine makers do not create the same safety studies for vaccines as they do for other drugs. This lack of true safety research of vaccines combined with the known adverse reactions to vaccination has helped Brandy to decide to never vaccinate her own child. Brandy says giving children a vaccine is like playing Russian roulette with our children and that mandatory vaccination is simply a way for vaccine makers to profit off of our children. Don’t be fooled: we do not need mandatory vaccination.


LarryCook333

Stop Mandatory Vaccination

How The Microbiome Destroyed The Ego, Vaccine Policy, And Patriarchy

microbiome_revolutionary_implications

The relatively recent discovery of the microbiome is not only completely redefining what it means to be human, to have a body, to live on this earth, but is overturning belief systems and institutions that have enjoyed global penetrance for centuries.

A paradigm shift has occurred, so immense in implication, that the entire frame of reference for our species’ self-definition, as well as how we relate fundamentally to concepts like “germs,” have been transformed beyond recognition. This shift is underway and yet, despite popular interest in our gut ecology, the true implications remain unacknowledged.

It started with the discovery of the microbiome, a deceptively diminutive term, referring to an unfathomably complex array of microscopic microorganisms together weighing only 3-4 lbs. in the average human, represents a Copernican revolution when it comes to forming the new center, genetically and epigenetically, of what it means in biological terms to be human.

Considering the sheer density of genetic information contained within these commensals, as well as their immense contribution towards sustaining basic functions like digestion, immunity, and brain function, the “microbiome” could just as well be relabeled the “macrobiome”; that is, if we are focusing on the size of its importance rather than physical dimensionality.

For instance, if you take away the trillions of viruses, bacteria and fungi that coexist with our human cells (the so-called holobiont), only 1% of the genetic material that keeps us ticking, and has for hundreds of millions of years, remains. One percent isn’t that much for the ego to work with, especially considering it now has to thank what were formerly believed to be mostly “infectious agents” for the fact that it exists. Even more perplexing, the remaining 1% of our contributed DNA to the collective gene pool of the holobiont is at least 8% retroviral (yes, the same category as HIV) in origin!

Us Against Them?

Once the object of modern medicine’s fundamental responsibility – the human body – is redefined and/or perceived with greater veracity, and “germs” become less other and more self, a challenge for germ theory which seeks to differentiate between the “good” germs we are versus the “bad” ones out there that we must fight with antibiotics and vaccines.

As many readers are already poignantly aware, today’s political climate and agenda is unilaterally pro-vaccination on both sides of the aisle (conveniently funded by the same industry lobbyists), with a tidal wave of bills across the U.S. set to eliminate exemptions against mandatory vaccination. The rationale, of course, is that deadly germs can only be prevented from killing the presumably germ-free host through injecting dead, weakened or genetically modified germ components to “prevent” theoretical future exposures and infection. This concept is of course intellectually infantile, and if you do some investigating you’ll find it was never quite grounded in compelling evidence or science.

But the intellectual implications of the microbiome go even deeper than undermining germ theory, vaccine policy, and the culture of medical monotheism that upholds these constructs…

Maternal Origins of Health and Ultimately our Species Identity

Deep within the substratum of humanity’s largely unquestioned assumptions of what it means to be human, the microbiome has also fundamentally displaced a latent patriarchal prejudice concerning the relative importance and contribution of the man and woman towards the health and ultimately the continuation of our species.

It has been known for some time that only women pass down mitochondrial DNA, already tipping the scales in favor of her dominant position in contributing genetic information (the seat of our humanity or species identity, no?) to offspring. The microbiome, however, changes everything in favor of amplifying this asymmetry of hereditary influence. Since we are all designed to gestate in the womb and come through the birth canal, and since the neonate’s microbiome is therein derived and established thereof, it follows that most of our genetic information as holobionts is maternal in origin. Even when the original colonization eventually changes and is displaced through environmentally-acquired microbial strains as the infant, child, adolescent, and then adult, develops, the original terrain and subsequent trajectory of changes was established through the mother (unless of course we were C-sectioned into the world).

Put in simpler terms: if 99% of what it means to be human is microbiome-based, and if the mother contributes most, if not all, of the original starting material, or at least the baseline and trajectory of future changes in the inner terrain, then her contribution becomes vastly more important than that of the father.

Moreover, the conditions surrounding gestation (important because of maternal-to-fetal microbiome trafficking in utero), her general health, and the way in which she gives birth (home, birth center, or hospital) now take on vastly greater importance than previously imagined. In other words, being born in a hospital via C-section and vaccination, will produce, genetically and epigenetically, a human that is so different – qualitatively – from one born at home, naturally, that they could almost be classified as different species, despite sharing nearly identical eukaryotic DNA (remember, only 1% of the holobiont’s total).

Given this perspective, obstetric interventions are the archetypal expression of a male-dominated paradigm that seeks to manage a woman’s birth experience with largely unacknowledged consequences for the health of our species. Protecting health and preventing disease has now been traced back to the origins of the microbiome, best expressed through natural birth in the home, which has been estimated to be as much as 1,000 times safer than a hospital birth despite propaganda to the contrary.

In light of the new, microbiome-based view, the male role in protecting the health of women and children will be irrevocably downgraded in importance, not just professionally and medically, but biologically.  First, it is interesting to look at the ancient roots of the biology-based psychospiritual disparities that exist between men and women, and which still influence today’s practice of medicine.

It would appear that men have from the beginning of time envied the creative role of women in conception, pregnancy, birth and caretaking. Erich Fromm also described the pyschospiritual implications for men of this biologically-based existential disparity in terms of the phenomena of womb-envy, exemplified by the biblical passage where God takes a rib from Adam to “create” Eve – an obvious reversal of the natural order of things, reflecting the inherent impotence men feel knowing their creative potency is secondary importance. It has been said, rightly, that the most powerful thing in the universe is to create life (is this not why we attribute this to “God”), and the second most powerful thing to take it. It is no coincidence that history, since it’s inception as recorded, is largely a documentation of the history of wars, of men “creating meaning” by killing men, and establishing symbol systems intended to capture by proxy the creative power latent within every woman’s body and experience.  And so, 10,000 years later, the world ruled by monotheistic, male-principled religious and cultural systems, both in secular and religious form, it seems that the facts of our biology are now intervening to shake up these largely subconscious belief systems in favor of an ancient truth: women are superior to men, fundamentally. (Though it is not a type of superiority to be used against the “weaker sex”: men, rather but to denote a higher responsibility, and perhaps greater need to be supported by men to get the job done, together, as inscribed in the natural order of things and its inherent design.)

The birth process, also, has been described as the closest thing to death without dying (it is ironic that anesthesiology, which could also be described in the same way, makes obstetrical interventions like C-section and epidural possible, at the same moment that it negates the spiritual experience of natural birth/women’s empowerment we are describing), offering women a window into the ‘in between’ and a direct experience of Source that men, less likely to experience it naturally would later emulate and access through the various technologies of shamanism.

Clearly, protecting the microbiome is of utmost importance if we are making the health of our future generations a priority. Indeed, ensuring the health of our offspring is perhaps the most fundamental evolutionary imperative we have.  How do we accomplish this? What is the microbiome but ultimately a selective array of commensal microorganisms that ultimately originated from the environment: in the air we breath, the soil we interact with, and the water and food, of course, we ingest. This means we can’t simply live in a hermetically sealed bubble of shopping for organic, non-GMO certified foods at Whole Foods, while the entire planet continues to go to post-industrial hell in a hand basket.  Our responsibility becomes distributed across everything in the world, and every impactful choice then becomes relevant to the fundamental issue and imperative at hand. With the microbial biodiversity in Big Ag, GM-based agricultural zones fire-bombed with biocides, by the very same corporations that either own or distribute the “organic brands” we all love to think will save our bodies, if not the planet, we need to step deeper into our activism by stepping out of the diversions and palliative measures that don’t result in lasting change.

When we work with the natural world, when we honor and acknowledge what is unknown about the complex web that we all share, we will bring back a vital health that now seems so far out of reach. When we engage technologies positioned in the war against germs and organisms, however, we are doomed to fail and to cripple not only our species but our home.


Article Contributed by Sayer Ji, Founder of GreenMedInfo.com.

Sayer Ji  is an author, researcher, lecturer, and advisory board member of the National Health Federation. He founded Greenmedinfo.com in 2008 in order to provide the world an open access, evidence-based resource supporting natural and integrative modalities. It is internationally recognized as the largest and most widely referenced health resource of its kind.

MSM To Pro-Vaxxers: Don’t Argue The Facts, Show Scary Pictures!

vaccine
By: Brandon Turbeville | Activist Post

The Vaccine industry, Big Pharma, and the mainstream media have some advice for vaccine zealots attempting to bully parents questioning the safety or effectiveness of vaccines into changing their minds – Don’t argue the facts! Show scary pictures!

In what can only be described as an instruction manual as to how to shame, bully, and shout a person down who simply has a different take on the best and safest way to raise their children, it is clear that the religion of vaccines and “scientism” now has the hallmark of any faith determined to spread itself – the presence of evangelicals.

The new vaccine evangelical movement is being provided with a script sheet of what to say and what to avoid when attempting to convert others to their belief system. Like most religions, the goal among the leaders and the zealots is a world where differing modes of thought no longer exist and where other opinions no longer force them to question the way they view that world.

Articles like “How To Change An Anti-Vaxxer’s Mind” by Jeffrey Kloger of TIME, are a perfect example of the recent propaganda blitz coming from the mainstream media. Kloger’s article is being quickly copied and rewritten in mainstream media outlets all across the country with the real vitriol being found in the more trendy hipster markets.

The recent propaganda push is being based upon a study by researchers at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. It’s not certain exactly how much time and effort was put into the study to discover what most undergraduate marketing students and any remotely successful politician, salesman, or sociopath already knows – that scary pictures are more effective at convincing hordes of people of an idea (true or false) than facts, reasoning, or logic.

In other words, the study and the mainstream media have determined that it is best to go after the emotional vulnerabilities of those who are either under-researched, on the fence, or who have been subjected to bullying and social pressure since hipsters and the cool kids realized it was the “in” thing this year to attack “anti-vaxxers.”

Consider the passage by Jeffrey Kloger of TIME who writes,

That’s a very noble goal, but it’s also one of the things that makes it so bloody hard to change their minds on the topic of vaccines. Public service campaigns don’t work; nor do one-on-one explanations of why the rumors about a vaccine-autism link are wrong. In some cases, there is even a backfire effect: the greater the effort expended to persuade the anti-vaxxers, the more convinced they become that they’re right.

So it’s extremely good news that researchers at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign may at last have come up with a way to cut through the misinformation and get the truth across: Don’t just tell parents to vaccinate their children, show them what happens if they don’t.

In other words: Don’t argue with them! Just show scary pictures! The hope is to catch someone unaware, in a weakened state, or someone who is unfortunately not as well-versed on the subject.

Of course, if you can’t convince someone by providing facts, logic, and reasoning there is always the chance that the person is irrational. But there is also the very real chance that they are quite lucid and that you, in fact, armed with all your talking points, media-induced outrage, and perceived intellectual superiority, are simply wrong.

Kloger does make an important point though. Most “anti-vaxxers” are unconvinced when confronted with the typical pro-vaccine argument. But that is not because they are necessarily rigid of belief, it is mostly because the typical pro-vaccine argument tends to be baseless propaganda, rooted in rhetoric instead of science. As for the social aspect, if “anti-vaxxers” didn’t abandon their beliefs when the first few waves of obnoxious Big-Pharma propaganda came blasting through the airwaves, they are generally not impressed when their friends, family, or even complete strangers take it upon themselves to give them a regurgitation of the talking points they heard about vaccines on NPR, CNN, or read in TIME magazine.

After all, social shaming and bullying – if one’s opinions are strong enough – tend to produce the opposite of the desired effect.

This idea of showing scary pictures, however, is not just a rudimentarily effective propaganda method, it can also be quite dangerous, particularly when the scary pictures are being broadcast over every outlet in the mainstream media.

Take the spate of articles posted in the New York Times, for example. Propaganda narratives like “My Patient Doesn’t ‘Do’ Vaccines,” “The Dangers Of Vaccine Denial,” “A Discredited Vaccine Study’s Continuing Impact On Public Health,” are all aimed at painting the science surrounding the numerous demonstrations of vaccine dangers as pseudo-science and parents who question the safety of vaccines as delusional, obsessive, Luddites. They are designed to produce a false consensus within society that vaccines are safe and effective. Basically, they are designed to create a self-fulfilling prophecy – if enough people read the propaganda and believe it, particularly if they think the majority of others believe it, the victim population will come to believe the propaganda.

Now, apparently, the New York Times and its ilk will be sharing scary pictures to go along with their tripe.

Of course, we all know what happened the last time the New York Times posted scary pictures and emotional words. Maybe one day we will finally leave Iraq….

Image credit: farsight 3


Brandon Turbeville is an author out of Florence, South Carolina. He has a Bachelor’s Degree from Francis Marion University and is the author of six books, Codex Alimentarius — The End of Health FreeBrandon Turbevilledom, 7 Real ConspiraciesFive Sense Solutions and Dispatches From a Dissident, volume 1 and volume 2, and The Road to Damascus: The Anglo-American Assault on Syria. Turbeville has published over 500 articles dealing on a wide variety of subjects including health, economics, government corruption, and civil liberties. Brandon Turbeville’s podcast Truth on The Tracks can be found every Monday night 9 pm EST at UCYTV.  He is available for radio and TV interviews. Please contact activistpost (at) gmail.com.

Frederica Wilson’s Proposed Legislation Mandating Child Vaccinations

fl-wilson-mandatory-vaccine-law-20150203

Vaccines work as intended for drug company profits – at the expense of human health. They’re inherently unsafe. More on this below.

Others will have to decide if Rep. Frederica Wilson (D. FL) means well or not. She calls herself “a voice for the voiceless.”

She was a teacher, a local school board member and elementary school principal “st(anding) up for the health of her students by opposing the construction of an environmentally dangerous waste facility” close to her school.

So why, as Florida’s 24th district representative, did she introduce HR 2232: Vaccinate All Children Act of 2015? Maybe she doesn’t know vaccines can cause diseases they’re supposed to prevent.

Dr. Viera Scheibner is a world renown vaccine expert. Her research shows drug companies produce pseudo-science inconsistent with hard evidence revealing vaccine dangers.

Numerous peer-reviewed studies show they can cause an array of degenerative diseases, anaphylaxis, infections, behavioral problems and other serious health issues.

Vaccines don’t immunize, Scheibner explains. They can damage internal organs and leave children or adults vulnerable to severe autoimmune diseases – including diabetes, arthritis, hepatitis, multiple sclerosis, osteoporosis, polio and numerous others.

They’re a potential minefield of future trouble. Some vaccines can kill. Others risk a lifetime of disability and pain. Autoimmune diseases result from toxins in drugs, food, air, water and other unsafe ingested substances.

Thousands of severe adverse vaccine reactions occur annually – including permanent disabilities and at times death. None of this gets reported. Instead, the myth of safe vaccines and importance of getting them persists.

They’re dangerous, unreliable and should be avoided – causing diseases they’re supposed to prevent. Claims otherwise are patently false. No evidence supports them.

No one should be forced to be vaccinated despite all US states requiring them – with exemptions (varying by states) for persons susceptible to adverse reactions, religious, philosophical or personal reasons, as well as legal challenges.

Government immunization policies are driven by politics, not science or public health concerns – except in cases of outbreaks of infectious diseases.

Vaccines are biological weapons able to weaken or destroy human immune systems. Scheibner is clear and unequivocal saying “there is no evidence whatsoever of the ability of vaccines to prevent any diseases. To the contrary, there is a great wealth of evidence that they cause serious side effects” harming human health.

US politicians have a long history of conspiring with corporate interests benefitting them at the expense of human health and welfare. Harmful GMO foods and ingredients perhaps are the best known examples.

Too few people know about vaccine hazards. Perhaps Rep. Wilson is one of them. If HR Res. 2232 becomes law, all children nationwide will be required to have HPV (human papillomavirus), hepatitis A, hepatitis B, rotavirus, annual flu shots and many other vaccinations. Until now, it’s been up to states to decide. Those not complying with federal law risk losing Public Health Services Act authorized “preventative health services” grants and perhaps others.

Parents not wanting their children vaccinated would be violating federal law, leaving them vulnerable to prosecution besides not letting them enroll their children in school. Exemptions for reasons explained above would be hard or impossible to get.

America already is a police state. Mandating harmful vaccines would let politicians and bureaucrats make health decisions over medical professionals.

It would violate the American Academy of Pediatrics code of ethics – requiring parental consent for any medical procedure.

“(P)arents or other surrogates (should) provide informed permission for diagnosis and treatment of children with the assent of the child whenever appropriate,” AAP says.

Politicians and bureaucrats should stay entirely out making health decisions for anyone but themselves.


Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at [email protected]. His new book is titled “How Wall Street Fleeces America: Privatized Banking, Government Collusion and Class War”. www.claritypress.com/Lendman.html Visit his blog site at www.sjlendman.blogspot.com.

Is The Medical-Pharmaceutical-Regulatory Cartel Assassinating Physicians? (VIDEO)

Dr. Jeff Bradstreet

James Jeffrey Bradstreet, whose body was found floating in a North Carolina river on June 19, had successfully treated over 1,700 autistic children with GcMAF. On June 16 the FDA obtained a search and seizure order targeting his Buford Georgia medical clinic.

Over the past several weeks no less than seven established doctors have either been killed or died under unusual circumstances (e.g. here and here). What do these physicians have in common and what remedies are they researching or advocating? Do any of their proposed treatments pose a threat to the multi-billion dollar pharmaceutical cartel? If so, would government agencies and/or private contractors be commissioned to harass and perhaps even assassinate such individuals?

The answer may lie in an understanding of nagalese, a protein made by cancer cells and viruses. Nagalese is a primary cause of immunodeficiency given its ability to block the body’s production of GcMAF, otherwise known as “Vitamin D binding microphage activating factor,” a naturally-produced immune regulating compound that aids in fighting what are traditionally considered terminal diseases. Some researchers suggest that nagalese is one of many toxic components found in the immunizations commonly administered to children, including the Measles-Mumps-Rubella vaccine.

Some independently-minded medical practitioners are beginning to acknowledge not only the nagalese-vaccination link, but also that GcMAF possesses great potential for the treatment of cancer and a variety of other illnesses, including autism, inflammation, and viral and bacterial disease.

The most prominent of the seven doctors who’ve been murdered or died under suspicious circumstances is James Jeffrey Bradstreet. As the contents of his blog drbradstreet.org suggest, Dr. Bradstreet has conducted extensive research into the causes of autism. His body was found on June 19 floating in a North Carolina river with a gunshot wound to his chest. Perhaps uncoincidentally, Bradstreet was a strong advocate of GcMAF and had treated over 2,000 autistic children with the substance; 85% exhibited marked improvement under his care.

Dr. Bradstreet’s private practice in Buford, Georgia centered on “treating children with Autism Spectrum Disorder, PPD, and related neurological and developmental disorders.” Bradstreet has also provided expert testimony in federal court for families of the vaccine-injured and was founder and president of the International Child Development Resource Center, which once employed autism expert Dr. Andrew Wakefield as its research director.

Of course, GcMAF is not approved by the Food and Drug Administration as a treatment for any disease. Just three days before Bradstreet’s body was recovered, FDA agents had obtained a court order targeting Bradstreet’s Buford Georgia medical clinic. The document granted the government the right to seize

All Globulin component Macrophage Activating Factor (GcMAF) GC Globulin, and/or any other products or component substances thereof that constitute misbranded drugs under the Federal Food, Drugs and Cosmetic Act.

Even in death Bradsteet and his GcMAF-related work continue to pose a threat to the medical-pharmaceutical-regulatory complex, as evidenced in their flak-generating public relations arms, “Quackwatch” and “Science Based Medicine,” each of which have published vicious broadsides on the deceased physician.

Big pharma, which for decades has exerted vigorous control over the regulatory process while presiding over literally millions of deaths via its products, will stop at nothing to hamper medical scientific progress and protect its bottom line. Perhaps this zealous quest for profits and control now even includes outright murder of alternative practitioners.


Professor James F. Tracy is an Associate Professor of Media Studies at Florida Atlantic University. James Tracy’s work on media history, politics and culture has appeared in a wide variety of academic journals, edited volumes, and alternative news and opinion outlets. James is editor of Union for Democratic Communication’s Journal Democratic Communiqué and a contributor to Project Censored’s forthcoming publication Censored 2013: The Top Censored Stories and Media Analysis of 2011-2012. Additional writings and information are accessible at memoryholeblog.com.

8 Dead Doctors, 5 Missing. You Wont Believe What They Knew, Who They Encountered And Why They Were Targeted! (VIDEO)

unknown person

Over the past few years there have been countless reports of dead bankers and scientists, however just this past month eight doctors have been found dead and five have gone missing after run-ins with the Feds. Including a doctors who linked vaccinations as a cause of autism and holistic doctors.

Is this all just a “coincidence” considering California’s passage of the forced vaccination law? Is it all just a “coincidence” that these doctors just so happen to be murdered the same time that Florida Senator, Frederica S. Wilson, introduces her draconian legislation to force children in public schools to be fully vaccinated? If not then why were five of the murdered doctors linked to the state of Florida, the very state of Frederica Wilson? I believe we have a conspiracy on our hands…

Eight Doctors Who Are Dead (Five Linked to Florida):

1- June 19th, 2015- Dr. Jeff Bradstreet a former resident of East Coast Florida who practiced in Georgia, was found dead with a gunshot wound to the chest in a river. His death was ruled suicide. He was a staunch opponent to vaccinations and avid autism researcher. He believed vaccinations were linked to autism and he proved it. Some believe he even found the cure to autism.

Dr. Jeff Bradstreet

2- June 21st, 2015 (Fathers Day) – Dr. Baron Holt a chiropractor who was found dead on Florida’s East Cost, but no cause of death has been listed. He practiced in North Carolina and attended college in Port Orange, Florida.

Dr. Baron Holt

3- June 21st, 2015- Dr. Bruce Hedendal DC PhD another chiropractor who was found dead on Florida’s East Cost but no cause of death has been listed. He lived in Boca Raton, Florida and overcame a tax-envision conviction.

Dr. Bruce Hedendal

4- June 29th, 2015 – Holistic doctor Teresa Sievers MD was found murdered in her home in Florida. 

doctor Teresa Sievers

5- July 19th, 2015 – OBGYN Dr. Ronald Schwartz, MD, was found murdered in his home in Florida. 

Dr. Ronald Schwartz

6- July 10th, 2015 – Osteopathic Doctor Lisa Riley was found in her home in Lee County Georgia, just a few hours from Florida, with a gunshot wound to her head. She was reportedly killed by her husband.

Doctor Lisa Riley

7- July 19th, 2015 – Doctor Amanda Crews from Modesto, California was murdered along with four others in her home.

Doctor Amanda Crews

8- July 21st, 2015- Dr. Nicholas Gonzalez, a prominent New York alternative Cancer Doctor dies of Heart Attack.

Gonzalez

Five Doctors Gone Missing:

1- June 19th, 2015 – Three doctors were traveling to the State Capital in Mexico and went missing that day. Authorities claim they found the bodies but family members say they look nothing like them.

2- July 3rd, 2015 – Dr. Patrick Fitzpatrick MD went missing. He was traveling from North Dakota, to neighboring Montana. His truck and trailer were found on the side of the road.

3- June 29th, 2015 – Dr. Jeffrey Whiteside MD a pulmonologist went missing, he was known for his successful treatment of lung cancer. He disappeared in Wisconsin while on vacation.

 

For More Information See:

http://yournewswire.com/body-of-doctor-who-linked-vaccines-to-autism-found-floating-in-river/

http://www.healthnutnews.com/fifth-holistic-alternative-doctor-33-found-dead-in-florida-making-5-dead-and-5-more-missing-doctors/

http://www.naturalblaze.com/2015/07/5th-doctor-age-33-died-in-florida.html

7th Doctor: http://www.people.com/article/quintuple-murder-victim-amanda-crews-had-a-heart-of-gold

Proposed Legislation: https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/2232

California SB277: http://www.sb277.org/


Lisa Haven is an independent Christian news analysis and one of the top contributors on www.BeforeItsNews.com. She is also author of www.LisaHavenNews.net and runs her own youtube channel (Lisa Haven) with tens-of-thousands of views per day. Digging deep and finding truth is what she lives for. Her passion is to spread truth no matter where it lies. She covers everything from martial law, to FEMA camps, to end time bible prophecy, to government documents and much more! Before launching her journalism career, she wrote many bible studies and lead women ministries for a number of years. She will also complete her ministry degree at International School of Ministry this year.

Mandatory Vaccinations Afoot: Medical Fascism Approaching Fast

The gun now backs the syringe: California’s 2 bills (SB277 and SB792) require mandatory vaccinations for children and adults, in total opposition to America’s foundation of individual rights and freedom. The Government believes it owns your body. Will you let it?

The gun now backs the syringe: California’s 2 bills (SB277 and SB792) require mandatory vaccinations for children and adults, in total opposition to America’s foundation of individual rights and freedom. The Government believes it owns your body. Will you let it?

Mandatory vaccinations are afoot as California has just achieved the horrific distinction of becoming the first state in the US to introduce compulsory vaccinations for both children and adults (bills SB277 and SB792 respectively). This goes to show that the NWO (New World Order) agenda of collectivism and medical fascism is fast approaching. There is no more time to sit on the fence, debate things intellectually or hide behind the excuse that certain agendas and events are just unprovable conspiracies. Suddenly it’s getting pretty real. By introducing mandatory vaccinations, the Government is essentially claiming it owns your body, it knows best when it comes to medicine and health, that the science behind vaccines is settled, and that it has the right to violate you if it deems in doing do that it’s “protecting the greater good”. How many people out there still consider that the Government forcibly injecting you with at least 10 toxic and carcinogenic vaccine adjuvants (such as mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde, diploid cells from aborted fetal tissue, MSG, etc.) is not a violation?

Australia and Other Nations Also on Road to Mandatory Vaccinations

The Rockefeller Medicine-Big Pharma-NWO push towards mandatory vaccinations is unfortunately not limited to the USA. It’s worldwide. In April I wrote about how Australia, sadly, was following lockstep in the footprints of the US and becoming GMO and Vaccine Australia. In attempting to boost the immunization rate, the Australian Government removed religious exemptions for vaccines, bribed (“incentivized”) doctors to inject more of their patients and financially punished people by tightening up welfare eligibility for parents who fail to vaccinate their children. Other nations that already have mandatory vaccination laws (either at a state or federal level) include Malaysia, Latvia, Slovenia and Croatia.

WHO Can Order Mandatory Vaccinations in All 194 Signatory Nations

To those who have been following the unfolding of the New World Order, it is also unsurprising that the WHO (World Health Organization), another subsidiary of the Rockefeller-created UN (United Nations), has laws on its books to be able to declare mandatory vaccinations in all its 194 signatory states. As Jane Burgermeister reports:

“The International Health Regulations (IHR) pursuant to Article 21 of the Constitution of WHO came into force in June 2007 and allow the General-Director of WHO to declare an international health emergency. In such a case, the Director-General can impose regulations, including “sanitary and quarantine requirements and other procedures designed to prevent the international spread of disease”, also travel restrictions. 

In the event of WHO declaring a pandemie, WHO has the authority to order forced vaccinations around the world.

All 194 signatory countries to IHR must comply.”

Funny how all these organizations like the UN, WHO and the US Government have “Generals” like a Director-General, Surgeon-General or a Secretary-General. Maybe it’s because they’re actually corporate and military organizations in disguise – with the intent and possibly the partial ability to force things like mandatory vaccinations on the population.

Airplane Companies Discussing Mandatory Vaccinations Too

It seems the medical fascism is not limited to the ground. There were reports in February 2015 of airline companies considering the possibility of introducing mandatory vaccinations also. Thankfully nothing has transpired from this … yet. However the mere fact that airlines were even toying with the idea of forcing people to get vaccinated in order to board a plane is very ominous. We are facing the very real possibility that, if we do not submit and bow down to Big Pharma, with all its bribery, undue political influence, fraudulent marketing, falsification of data and junk science, we will lose our rights and freedoms, or the ability to live a “normal” life in this day and age, which includes things like air travel.

Idea of Mandatory Vaccinations Based on Pseudoscientific Myth of Herd Immunity

The main excuse and justification rolled out by Government, Big Pharma, the Western medical establishment and other pro-vaxxers for a national or global scheme like mandatory vaccinations is herd immunity. Behind that is the idea of collectivism or “for the greater good”. As I discussed in the article “Herd Immunity vs. Viral Shedding: Who’s Infecting Whom?“, herd immunity is a pseudoscientific myth. For starters, vaccine-induced immunity is not equivalent to real naturally-acquired immunity. Logic dictates that if vaccines really worked, the vaccinated would have no need to worry about a disease supposedly being spread by the unvaccinated, because the vaccinated would be protected. The very fact that they are worrying shows that there is serious doubt over the efficacy of vaccines.

Mandatory Vaccinations = Medical Fascism and Collectivism

Even if vaccines were 100% effective on everyone all of the time – which is very very far from the truth – mandatory vaccinations are still a horribly tyrannical manifestation of collectivism, the notion that all individuals must sacrifice their rights, desires and freedom for the greater good. Of course, the greater good is always defined by the State, or the small group of usually power-hungry individuals who have gained control of the helm of Government. The Government is now trying to claim it has the legal right to do what it wants with your body, including injecting full of poisons disguised as “medicine”, for whatever noble-sounding pretext it comes up with.

We have entered a dangerous chapter in the evolution of our society; we can only hope enough individuals recognize the inherent tyranny of mandatory vaccinations and rise up against them. Even people like Dr. Ron Paul, who as a Western medical doctor is actually in favor of vaccines, spoke out against the idea of compulsory vaccinations on the grounds of libertarianism and individual rights, which just goes to show that you don’t have to be against vaccines to believe in basic liberty.

Of course, whether people will comply with such oppression as mandatory vaccinations remains to be seen …

 

Sources:

https://birdflu666.wordpress.com/2009/07/09/who-has-the-power-to-order-forced-vaccines-in-194-countries/

http://nationalreport.net/airlines-consider-requiring-proof-vaccination-domestic-air-travel/

http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2015/february/08/vaccine-controversy-shows-why-we-need-markets-not-mandates/


Makia Freeman is the editor of The Freedom Articles and senior researcher at ToolsForFreedom.com, writing on many aspects of the global conspiracy, from vaccines to Zionism to false flag operations and more, and also including info on natural health, sovereignty and higher consciousness.

Facebook Owner Takes Public Stand Against Vaccine Refusers

Zuckerberg_meets_Obama
By: Brian Shilhavy, Health Impact News Editor


With medical and health authorities all across the United States beginning to take action to remove freedom of choice in refusing vaccines, Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg has taken a public position in the current vaccine debate, in what many in the media are reporting to be a direct attack against those who refuse or question vaccines:

Mark Zuckerberg just slammed the anti-vaccination movement – Business Insider

Mark Zuckerberg Is Sending a Message to the Anti-Vaccine Crowd – Yahoo Tech

Zuckerberg takes aim at vaccine deniers through his online book club – The Verge

Amar Toor of the Verge writes:

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has selected a decidedly pro-vaccine book for the latest installment of his online book club, following a report last week that pointed to surprisingly low vaccination rates at Silicon Valley daycares affiliated with Google and other tech companies. The book, On Immunity by Eula Bliss, examines and disarms the fear underpinning the anti-vaccine movement, based on Bliss’ personal experience with her young child.

Health Impact News recently published a book review of On Immunity by journalist Jennifer Margulis, which was originally published by The Washington Independent Review of Books, but subsequently removed by what Margulis claims was an act of censorship, because they did not want to hear both sides of the vaccine debate. So for another view of this book Mr. Zuckerberg has chosen to endorse see: How Journalists are Censored from Covering Both Sides of the Vaccine Debate.

Does this Pave the Way for Facebook to Censor Free Speech on Vaccines?

So what’s next for Zuckerberg and Facebook? Since Zuckerberg is apparently taking the position that “the science on vaccines is settled,” will he also take the corresponding position that Americans do not have a right to refuse vaccines, for “the greater good?”

Like technology billionaire and vaccine supporter Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg has enough money and influence to force people to adopt his position. His tax revenue alone provides billions to the U.S. Government and State of California, and he can give away up to half of his income by U.S. law to charitable organizations to avoid paying even more taxes.

This “philanthropy” coming out of Silicon Valley is creating what some are calling a “Brave New Economic Order.” Andrew Gumbel wrote earlier this week:

The trend is national but only in Silicon Valley do companies like Google or Apple have more money than local governments and spend accordingly. Zuckerberg and fiber optic telecommunications entrepreneur David Welch have become players in the education debate — not only because they want to, but because they can. They can outspend school districts and – especially in Welch’s case – outlawyer the teachers unions, which is a dramatic shift from standard democratic practice and perhaps more important than whether or not their cause is just. (Source.)

Zuckerberg is donating millions to schools and hospitals. What’s next? A new pro-vaccine policy for anything published on Facebook for “the greater good?”

Is Anything on Facebook Really Private?While Facebook offers its users “private messaging” or “closed groups” and multiple “privacy” features to supposedly protect your privacy, is anything put on Facebook really private? Facebook has almost 10,000 employees, and their Privacy Policy, which is quite lengthy and subject to change at any time, can be found here. Have you ever taken the time to read it? Here are some quotes regarding their Privacy Policy that you agree to when you use Facebook:

We share information we have about you within the family of companies that are part of Facebook.

If the ownership or control of all or part of our Services or their assets changes, we may transfer your information to the new owner.

We work with third party companies who help us provide and improve our Services or who use advertising or related products, which makes it possible to operate our companies and provide free services to people around the world.

Here are the types of third parties we can share information with about you: (Source.)

I have been telling people for years that nothing you put on Facebook is guaranteed to be private, and that one should never put anything on Facebook that you do not want the whole world to know, even if you think that information is “private.”

Read more: http://vaccineimpact.com/2015/facebook-owner-takes-public-stand-against-vaccine-refusers/#sthash.vmCBpFxx.dpuf

 

Photo: Zuckerberg listening to President Barack Obama before a private meeting where Obama dined with technology business leaders in Woodside, California. Image from Wikimedia.

 

Anti-GMO But Pro-Vaccine?

anti_gmo_vaccine

The truth is that the GMO and vaccine agendas are the same; only, activists appear to think there is a difference.

Few things are as disturbing to me as the divide that exists between the GMO and vaccine awareness movements. If you look closely you’ll see the exact same concerns: the violation of informed consent, the neglect of the precautionary principle, predominance of industry propaganda over actual science, the revolving door between government regulators and legislators and industry, and the undermining of the fundamental right of bodily self-possession, the keystone of health freedom. And yet, these two groups behave as if they are fighting their own separate battles, with the end result that they usually are.

Non-GMO Blindspot

There are numerous examples of how these movements are lost without one another. For instance, the non-GMOs movement adamantly supports organic production methods, correct? But if you look at big players, such as Organic Valley and Horizon Organic, both openly utilize vaccines in their veterinary care practices, some of which either contain genetically modified components, adventitious retroviruses that alter host DNA sequences and/or expression, or utilize pathogens which have been genetically altered in a way that may result in altered genetic expression in the vaccinated animal and/or those who consume these animal products. These obviously non-organic practices and/or consequences to the consumer are perfectly legal: the USDA Organic standards not only permit vaccination, but consider it the only pharmaceutical product that should be administered to cows in the absence of obvious disease. Clearly, what is legal is not always right. Many companies are perfectly happy milking the muti-billion dollar organic market at the expense of haplessly loyal consumers who buy “organic-washed” products.

Even the Non-GMO Project, which while performing a valuable service of independently certifying foods as non-GMO, also generates a false sense of consumer security because many of these non-GMO foods still contain pesticides, and in the case of “non-GMO” oats, agrochemicals like glyphosate (Roundup). This is because non-GMO certification is radically different from USDA organic certification. And what really needs to happen is that non-GMO products must also be verified to be clear of common GM agrochemicals like glyphosate and its metabolite byproducts (AMPA).

The goal is to be assured we aren’t being poisoned by our food, is it not? 

If so, the non-GMO movement needs to shift its focus to a deeper appreciation and criticism of the institutional/systemic problems that subtend the relatively myopic fixation on GMO labeling initiatives to broader concerns with environmental destruction and widespread toxicant exposures that come with modern food production methods.

GMOs in Vaccines?

And then there is a topic few on the non-GMO side seem to want to tackle head on: the present-day vaccine schedule contains a wide range of genetically modified ingredients that are being injected directly into the most vulnerable infants and children in our population. The HPV vaccine, for instance, which is comprised of a genetically modified form of yeast containing HPV-like antigens, has the worst adverse reports events (some lethal) on record.  Mind you, it has never once been proven to prevent a single case of cervical cancer because proxy markers for efficacy and not clinical proof were all the FDA required for its approval. Where is the non-GMO uproar about this? How do the most vulnerable and victimized populations benefit from the non-GMO and non-vaccine movements turning away from one another, or claiming that the explosion of autism diagnoses is only caused by either GMO foods or vaccines, not both, which is the more obvious likelihood?

Even the rage against Monsanto, widely considered “the world’s most evil corporation,” may constitute a diversionary tactic against the increasing number of activists in need of a suitable, socially sanctioned object of catharsis. Millions marched against Monsanto, but how many were aware that Monsanto is owned by an even larger corporation, Pfizer, who has been expanding its vaccine portfolio and influence on vaccine legislation while the public eye has been largely focused on labeling GMOs. [1]:

Former Monsanto is today known as Pharmacia LLC. Pharmacia is now a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer Inc., which operates the Pharmaceutical business.” [Source: Monsanto: Who We Are]

But you can’t just blame one or two companies for the increasingly bleak picture. The direction of technological science, unguided by internal ethical principles or external regulatory controls, is towards the complete convergence of the vaccine and GMO agendas in a way that precludes informed consent and any vestige of consumer/patient choice. This abstract provides insight into what I mean:

J Biosci Bioeng. 2014 Oct;118(4):441-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2014.04.004. Epub 2014 May 1.

Stable accumulation of seed storage proteins containing vaccine peptides in transgenic soybean seeds.

Maruyama N1, Fujiwara K2, Yokoyama K2, Cabanos C2, Hasegawa H3, Takagi K4, Nishizawa K5, Uki Y2, Kawarabayashi T6, Shouji M6, Ishimoto M4, Terakawa T3.

Abstract

There has been a significant increase in the use of transgenic plants for the large-scale production of pharmaceuticals and industrial proteins. Here, we report the stable accumulation of seed storage proteins containing disease vaccine peptides in transgenic soybean seeds. To synthesize vaccine peptides in soybean seeds, we used seed storage proteins as a carrier and a soybean breeding line lacking major seed storage proteins as a host.Vaccine peptides were inserted into the flexible disordered regions in the A1aB1b subunit three-dimensional structure. The A1aB1b subunit containing vaccine peptides in the disordered regions were sorted to the protein storage vacuoles where vaccine peptides are partially cleaved by proteases. In contrast, the endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-retention type of the A1aB1b subunit containing vaccine peptides accumulated in compartments that originated from the ER as an intact pro-form. These results indicate that the ER may be an organelle suitable for the stable accumulation of bioactive peptides using seed storage proteins as carriers.

Above, a genetically modified soy bean (transgenic soy) has been engineered to express proteins that would be used to produce a vaccine against pathological brain structures found in Alzheimer’s disease. Not an isolated case, there is a wide range of research now on the development of vaccines using plants and animals (bioreactors) to produce biological products, including half human (chimeric) proteins to be used in medicine. Some of these vaccines are intended to be edible. What could possibly go wrong with such GMOs?  Consider that biopollution with transgenes are forever, and that if the species containing the transgenes produces pollen, it could “biorape” non-GMO plants, converting them into GM vaccine-antigen producing plants. This is not science fiction, rather, a logical inevitability once these organisms are created and released into the biosphere.

Is not the underlying concept of GMO-produced edible vaccines the perfect illustration of our point: the two movements need to acknowledge they face the same adversaries. The GMO and vaccine agendas are essentially the same, with the same controllers and the same intention of forced implementation, especially if we fail to act together.

Genetically Engineering Ourselves: DNA Vaccines

But there is an even more salient example of the merger of these two agendas: DNA vaccines. This is the next iteration of the vaccine agenda: infecting host cells with transgenes that will take over and cause infected cells to produce vaccine antigen within your body.  How healthy does this sound? This is what I would call a prime example of applied transhumanism.

While millions now fight for the right to label their breakfast cereals or Starbucks latte’s GMO or non-GMO, the other side of the same massive, global biotech industry is developing technology to genetically modify YOU and your children. Which is scarier? Which is more relevant? And why is the non-GMO movement not joining forces with the non-Vaccine movement, which is up against a tidal wave of legislation to effectively make compliance with all present and future vaccine recommendations mandatory (and there are over 140 in development!). California was lost to this carefully architected human rights monstrosity, and now the dominos are set to fall all over the country, including the state you live in.

This is a dismal picture, but there are signs that leaders in the movement are waking up to the necessity of collaboration, and are keen to the fact that the exact same controllers – individuals, corporations and governments — are orchestrating both the pro-GM and pro-vaccine agendas, and benefiting profoundly by fragmenting us.

Perhaps next time you are thinking about ousting GMOs by “voting with your fork,” you would be well served to consider with equal vehemence that removal of exemptions against GMO-containing vaccines is worse than “forced feeding.”


[1] https://www.pfizer.com/system/files/presentation/ProxyStatement2015.pdf


Article Contributed by Sayer Ji, Founder of GreenMedInfo.com.

Sayer Ji is an author, researcher, lecturer, and advisory board member of the National Health Federation. He founded Greenmedinfo.com in 2008 in order to provide the world an open access, evidence-based resource supporting natural and integrative modalities. It is internationally recognized as the largest and most widely referenced health resource of its kind.

You Can’t Find The Truth About Vaccines By Burying Your Head In Peer-Reviewed Studies

A message to doctors & so-called scientists: you can’t find the truth about vaccines by burying your head in peer-reviewed studies, as the CDC scandal shows.

A message to doctors & so-called scientists: you can’t find the truth about vaccines by burying your head in peer-reviewed studies, as the CDC scandal shows.

 

The truth about vaccines cannot be found by simply declaring: “I am only going to consider peer-reviewed studies as my source of evidence, and ignore everything else, because anything else doesn’t live up to my standards for evidence-based science“. Why? Simple reason: the evidence is cooked. It’s manipulated. It’s frequently omitted, changed, fudged, modified or just about everything else under the sun to suit the agenda of whomever ordered and funded it, whether it be the Big Pharma companies themselves, or the government agencies they control, like the CDC and the FDA. On one level, careers, power and billions and billions of dollars are at stake, and on another level, the depopulation agenda made official by war criminal Henry Kissinger must go on. There is way too much incentive to lie, cheat and obscure the truth about vaccines, namely that there is plentiful, significant evidence that vaccines cause autism.

Latest CDC Scandal Underlies Rampant Fraud in Vaccine Literature

The latest example of rampant fraud in vaccine literature is the CDC scandal. Whistleblower Dr. William Thompson, who works at the CDC (but not any more after this), came forward and admitted that he worked on a study in 2004 that showed a very significant statistical relationship between boys who received the MMR vaccine (in this case young black boys) and those who developed autism. The study found that there was a 340% increase in autism among young black boys who had received the MMR shot. When Thompson told his superiors at the CDC about this, what did they do? Covered it up, of course.

In an effort to keep this aspect of the research secret, the CDC redefined the study, reducing the sample size to a small data set so it would not achieve statistical significance. This is outright fraud. The CDC then claimed there was no causal connection between vaccines and autism to keep its client (Big Pharma) happy.

Peer-Reviewed Fraud

Another point worth remembering is that the “peer-reviewed” concept is far from the gold standard science wants it to be. The peer review process is gravely flawed and easily abused, sad to say. There are many examples of people working the system and fraudulently reviewing their own paper. Take the example of the Journal of Vibration and Control, which had to retract 60 flawed “peer-reviewed” studies, or the Germany-based publishing group Springer and New York-based Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE) which retracted over 120 papers.

As Richard Smith, former editor of the respected British Medical Journal (BMJ), said:

“The editor looks at the title of the paper and sends it to two friends whom the editor thinks know something about the subject. If both advise publication the editor sends it to the printers. If both advise against publication the editor rejects the paper. If the reviewers disagree the editor sends it to a third reviewer and does whatever he or she advises. This pastiche — which is not far from systems I have seen used — is little better than tossing a coin.”

The Lesson: If You Only Look at Peer-Reviewed Studies, You’ll Miss the Wood for the Trees

If you are so focused on hard evidence to satisfy your rational left-brain, you will never realize that you are working with faulty data. You will miss the big picture by being so obsessed with details. Yes, it is important to have evidence to back your claims, but if you fail to understand the gigantic scale to which data is corrupted by moneyed interests, then you will fail to see the truth about vaccines (i.e. that they damage the immune system, cause autism in some individuals and create horrendous side-effects).

That’s the problem with being so in your left brain and so focused on only tangible and material things, or things that can be proven with a high degree of evidence. This mentality thinks of itself as “scientific” but in reality is limited in its perspective and is easily fooled by many aspects of the global conspiracy. The doctors and scientists who cannot but think like this are left-brain prisoners who unwittingly function as gatekeepers for the New World Order, because common people look up to them and believe what they say. White coat = scientific authority, right?

We would do well to recall the experiments done in the 1970s showing the very real dangers of blind obedience to authority.

In conclusion, if you want to know the truth about vaccines, look very closely at the history of criminality of Big Pharma and its governmental lackeys, because you may discover a lot more about vaccines by analyzing their fraud and pattern of coverup, than by reading yet another Big Pharma-funded peer-reviewed study.


Makia Freeman is the editor of The Freedom Articles and senior researcher at ToolsForFreedom.com, writing on many aspects of the global conspiracy, from vaccines to Zionism to false flag operations and more, and also including info on natural health, sovereignty and higher consciousness.

Gov’t Issues Checkmate On Citizens: Vaccinate All Children Act Of 2015 (VIDEO)

government corruption

On May 1st, Frederica S. Wilson, a Florida Democrat Congresswoman, introduced a draconian legislation that would send chills down your spine! If passed the legislation would require all public school students to be fully vaccinated according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines. The proposed bill is called H.R.2232 and rightly titled— .

According to the bill:

REQUIREMENT.—For a State or a political subdivision or other public entity of a State to be eligible to receive a grant under this section, the applicant shall demonstrate to the Secretary’s satisfaction that, subject to paragraphs (2) and (3), the State requires each student enrolled in one of the State’s public elementary schools or public secondary schools to be vaccinated in accordance with the recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.

If the state refuses to abide by this law, they will pull the cities federal education grant funding—thereby forcing the issues of vaccination. Here is the breaking report…

“There are currently 271 vaccines in the development pipeline,” The Daily Sheeple

For More Information See:

https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/2232/titles

http://www.hhs.gov/nvpo/vacc_plan/index.html

http://www.hhs.gov/nvpo/national_adult_immunization_plan_draft.pdf

http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/downloads/child/0-18yrs-child-combined-schedule.pdf


Lisa Haven is an independent Christian news analysis and one of the top contributors on www.BeforeItsNews.com. She is also author of www.LisaHavenNews.net and runs her own youtube channel (Lisa Haven) with tens-of-thousands of views per day. Digging deep and finding truth is what she lives for. Her passion is to spread truth no matter where it lies. She covers everything from martial law, to FEMA camps, to end time bible prophecy, to government documents and much more! Before launching her journalism career, she wrote many bible studies and lead women ministries for a number of years. She will also complete her ministry degree at International School of Ministry this year.

Mandatory Adult Vaccines Coming To California Or GO TO JAIL! SB792 (VIDEO)

vaccine

Kenny Valenzuela breaks down the latest in California’s medical tyranny. First it was SB277 mandating vaccines for children; now it’s SB792 – mandatory adult vaccinations. No personal exemptions and criminal penalties for failure to comply. With 300 new vaccinations coming in the next 6 years, it seems like a good time to eliminate all opt-outs.

 

Research links:


California legislature SB-792 Day care facilities immunizations exemptions
California Mandates Poisoning Children SB277 Vaccine Bill Passes
California Now Wants to be First State to Mandate Adult Vaccines – Criminal Penalties
300 New Genetically Modified Vaccines by 2023
Mandatory Vaccines for Adults? Leave It to California
New York Measles Outbreak 90% Vaccinated
Senator Richard Pan Caught Lying About Aborted Fetal Cells in Vaccines!
FDA Vaccine Insert Lists Autism as Adverse Reaction

You can see more of Kenny Valenzuela’s informative videos, as well as donate, at ExperimentalVaccines.org 

Vaccine Associated Narcolepsy Genetically Changing The Brain Forever! (VIDEO)

h1n1

More information continues to emerge about the link between the Pandemrix H1N1 flu vaccine and the incurable sleeping disorder, narcolepsy. Kenny Valenzuela explains the importance of how vaccines can cross the blood-brain barrier.

 
ExperimentalVaccines

 

How John Berchielli Was Poisoned By The Tetanus Vaccine (VIDEO)

Capture

Vaccine safety is a hotly debated topic and continues to be a consistent issue between health officials and the public. There’s plenty of gray area when it comes to vaccination. They’re not 100% effective and, without warning, vaccine injuries occur and are usually downplayed to keep the public in line. Take the case of John Berchielli, who is now experiencing debilitating health concerns related to the Tetanus diphtheria pertussis vaccination.

About 48 hours after receiving the vaccine, he began to feel weak. A few days later, while walking his dog, he collapsed. After being admitted to the hospital, he connected the beginning of these strange events to the vaccine. He was diagnosed with Guillian-barre Syndrome, a common vaccine-related injury. This health issue is when the body’s immune system attacks nerves and inhibits the body’s normal movement and processes.

To get a better feel of what John has been going through after his vaccination, please watch the video. You can also raise your voice and send a message to your local congressman, health professional, or even national pharmaceutical industry demanding safer protocols.

What are your thoughts on John’s story?


Dr. Edward F. Group III, DC, NP, DACBN, DCBCN, DABFM has studied natural healing methods for over 20 years and now teaches individuals and practitioners all around the world. He no longer sees patients but solely concentrates on spreading the word of health and wellness to the global community. Under his leadership, Global Healing Center, Inc. has earned recognition as one of the largest alternative, natural and organic health resources on the Internet.

Herd Immunity vs. Viral Shedding: Who’s Infecting Whom?

The vaccine empire has collapsed

Big Pharma and the Medical Establishment use the idea of herd immunity to induce fear and sell vaccines, yet viral shedding puts the notion on its head.

Herd immunity, or community immunity as it is also known, is one of the main arguments that “pro-vaxxers” (those advocating vaccination) advance to persuade people to take vaccines. Herd immunity, so it is claimed, provides indirect protection to the unvaccinated. How? Here’s how the reasoning goes: if enough people get vaccinated, when a contagious disease hits a community, it spreads less quickly than if the majority were not vaccinated, since they are now protected. Thus, those unvaccinated few living among the vaccinated many can now enjoy some protection because the disease is finding it harder to spread and infect new individuals. This argument has many assumptions and flaws, as we shall see.

Interestingly enough, in recent times a concept that is essentially the opposite of herd immunity – i.e. viral shedding – has been in the news. You see, people using the argument of herd immunity generally claim that the unvaccinated help speed the spread of a disease, even encompassing those who got vaccinated. In other words, the unvaccinated can infect the vaccinated. The phenomenon of viral shedding, on the other hand, is showing that those who get vaccines get the virus in their body – even if it’s weak or attenuated – and the virus then sheds, can become contagious and can start spreading. In other words, the vaccinated can infect the unvaccinated. So which is the more true concept: herd immunity or viral shedding? Who’s infecting whom?

Vaccine-Induced Herd Immunity is Full of Assumptions

To get to the bottom of this question, you need to take a close look at this notion of herd immunity. It contains the following assumptions:

  1. Vaccines really are effective in protecting you against a disease;
  2. Once you get a vaccine, you are protected for a long time, rp for life against that disease;
  3. Vaccines protect you from getting infected and transmitting the disease;
  4. Herd immunity can be acquired through vaccination just as it can be acquired naturally (i.e. when a significant number of people in a community contract and overcome a disease, and then have natural antibodies against it).

Take the first assumption of vaccine efficacy. The big flaw with the herd immunity argument is that, by its very definition, it undermines the idea that vaccines actually work. If vaccines really were effective at protecting you against a disease, why would you worry that if those around got it, you would be more at risk or more in danger? If you’re protected, you’re protected, right? If the vaccine provides you genuine immunity to a disease, as Big Pharma, the CDC and the Western medical establishment like to claim, then it logically follows that it should be of no consequence to your health if you are surrounded by 1 or 100 contagious people.

herd-immunity-viral-shedding-2The only way around this is if you believe that vaccines are effective yet contraindicated for some people, such as infants, pregnant women or the elderly. So you vaccinate yourself but not your baby or your grandmother, and you worry for their health because there is not enough herd immunity in your community. Given Big Pharma’s propensity to ratchet up the vaccine schedule on the entire population, there are not many people exempt anymore; take a look at this chart on the right or at National Vaccine Information Center to see how the schedule has changed over the last few decades for kids. However, even if you are in this (rare) scenario, there are still problems with the idea of herd immunity.

Take the second assumption of supposed lifelong immunity. If herd immunity is really so important to protect a community, that would presuppose that the vaccinated could fight off the disease – whenever it struck. So what happens after 5 years go by after you get your shot? 10 years? 20? 30? Even if you go and get your booster shots regularly, vaccine-induced immunity still wears off after time.

Take the third assumption regarding the vaccinated being able to transmit disease. As reported by Mercola in 2013, a FDA study concluded that those vaccinated against pertussis or whopping cough could still carry and transmit the disease, even they got no symptoms. In this case you become an “asymptomatic carrier“. This finding could bust a hole wide open in the herd immunity argument. If the vaccinated can carry a disease, they are not adding to a robust and protected herd.

Lastly, take the fourth assumption of vaccine-induced immunity vs. natural immunity. Clearly, there is a world of difference between artificial vaccine-induced immunity, and naturally-acquired immunity, attained through contracting and successfully fighting off a disease. The human immune system is vastly more complex and sophisticated than we understand, and is made up of specific and non-specific parts. A vaccine does not closely resemble natural immunity in many ways, including only engendering a specific response, having a completely different point of entry, not conferring lifelong immunity, etc. Besides, immunity is far more mysterious than just a measure of antibody titers.

As Mercola writes:

“The science clearly shows that there’s a big difference between naturally acquired herd immunity and vaccine-acquired herd immunity … Vaccines are designed to trick your body’s immune system into producing an immune response that includes making protective antibodies that are needed to resist future exposure to the infectious viral or bacterial microorganism. However, your body is smarter than that. The artificial manipulation of your immune system by vaccines containing lab altered bacteria and viruses, as well as chemicals and other ingredients, simply does not exactly replicate the response that your immune system mounts when naturally encountering the infectious microorganism. This is one reason why vaccine policymakers say you need to get “booster” shots because vaccine acquired immunity is only temporary and wears off, sometimes rather quickly.”

Herd Immunity is a Pseudoscientific Myth

Dr. Russell Blaylock, an expert on the topic of excitotoxins who has spoken out against the use of MSG in food, as well as the aluminum fallout from chemtrails/geoengineering which can lead to brain damage and Alzheimer’s, writes:

“If we listen to present-day wisdom, we are all at risk of resurgent massive epidemics should the vaccination rate fall below 95%. Yet, we have all lived for at least 30 to 40 years with 50% or less of the population having vaccine protection. That is, herd immunity has not existed in this country for many decades and no resurgent epidemics have occurred. Vaccine-induced herd immunity is a lie used to frighten doctors, public-health officials, other medical personnel, and the public into accepting vaccinations.”

The Danger of Viral Shedding

Herd immunity is a smokescreen for what’s really going on. It’s an inversion of the truth. While Big Pharma and the medical establishment are pointing the finger at the unvaccinated, it is actually the vaccinated who are contributing to the spread of disease.

The real issue is viral shedding. Viral vaccines are vaccines containing live viruses, even if they are weak or attenuated strains. These live viruses shed for varying amounts of time in the body fluids of a vaccinated individual – and can be transmitted to others. You can absolutely catch the virus (or bacterium) from someone who has just been vaccinated against that disease. Not only that, but viral shedding from vaccines is leading to viral and bacterial mutations, helping to create a phenomenon of new and dangerous strains of disease which can evade treatment by becoming accustomed to whatever drugs get thrown at them.

As Dave Mihalovic writes:

“Bird flu is rampaging across the Midwestern US. So far 13 million chickens and turkeys have been culled or earmarked for destruction to stop the spread of H5N2, an offspring of Asia’s H5N1 bird flu … vaccinated poultry spread the virus without getting sick, making its spread invisible. Vaccination has moreover driven the evolution of H5N1as these viruses adapt to the vaccinated birds.”
In his article his quotes Barbara Loe-Fisher, co-founder and president of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC):
“The live polio vaccine, the Sabin vaccine, which followed the inactivated Salk vaccine, was given orally [and] contains live attenuated polioviruses. Those polioviruses, when you take that [live] vaccine, you shed them in your body fluids – your saliva, urine, and stool. Vaccine-strain viruses like disease viruses or infections can be found also sometimes in tears and vomit. This is true for the Ebola virus as well. Whether you have the viral infection or you get the live attenuated vaccine, you shed live virus in your body fluids and you are able to transmit the virus to other people who come in contact with your body fluids [my emphasis]. I think this is a very important thing for people to understand.”

Alert: Taking Vaccines Can Genetically Modify You and Generations to Come

We are already under numerous environmental assaults, including excessive radiation and GMOs, which are threatening to mutate our DNA. An article in Mother Jones reported that toxins can actually act upon your DNA and change it, at the epigenetic level.

“Researchers from Washington State University, led by biology professor Michael Skinner, reported last month that short-term exposure of pregnant rats to several kinds of chemicals caused ovarian disease not just in their daughters but also in two subsequent generations of females.”

As Jon Rappoport suggests:

“We are talking about lasting genetic changes, from parents to children, down the line. There is every reason to believe that injecting chemical toxins (in vaccines) would have a still greater permanent effect than, say, breathing pesticides.”

Remember, in addition to containing viruses that can shed, vaccines are full of toxic adjuvants (including aborted fetal tissue) which are provably carcinogenic (like the cancer-causing monkey virus SV-40) or at the very least highly harmful. We know the “scientific evidence” has being infiltrated by industry-funded studies and that the peer-review process has been hijacked.

A vaccine’s ability to lead to viral shedding, group infection, genetic mutation of you and genetic mutation of your future offspring turns the false idea of vaccine-induced herd immunity on its head. The question was asked: who is infecting whom? The evidence would strongly suggest that it is the vaccines and the vaccinated who are causing the problem and spreading the disease.

Sources:

http://www.nvic.org/CMSTemplates/NVIC/pdf/49-Doses-PosterB.pdf

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2013/12/10/whooping-cough-pertussis-vaccine.aspx

http://blindedbythelightt.blogspot.com/2012/01/no-comparison-naturally-immunity-vs.html

http://www.vaccinationcouncil.org/2012/02/18/the-deadly-impossibility-of-herd-immunity-through-vaccination-by-dr-russell-blaylock/

http://www.naturalblaze.com/2015/05/vaccination-is-driving-force-behind.html

http://www.motherjones.com/blue-marble/2012/06/can-exposure-toxins-change-your-dna

http://www.activistpost.com/2015/07/mandatory-vaccination-california-is.html


Makia Freeman is the editor of The Freedom Articles and senior researcher at ToolsForFreedom.com, writing on many aspects of the global conspiracy, from vaccines to Zionism to false flag operations and more, and also including info on natural health, sovereignty and higher consciousness.

U.S. Jails Lone Vaccine Researcher, While Fraud Remains Epidemic: “Perhaps Half May Simply Be Untrue”

vaccine-scientist

By: Mac Slavo | SHTFplan.com –

With many states on the move to make vaccinations mandatory, perhaps people should reconsider how sound that vaccine safety really is – and how much we trust the system to keep it in check.

A vaccine researcher formerly at Iowa State University was sentenced to four and a half years in prison for spiked data, after admitting to “fabricating and falsifying data in HIV vaccine trials.”

Rare is the scientist who goes to prison on research misconduct charges. But on 1 July, Dong-Pyou Han, a former biomedical scientist at Iowa State University in Ames, was sentenced to 57 months for fabricating and falsifying data in HIV vaccine trials.

In some cases, Han spiked rabbit blood samples with human HIV antibodies so that the vaccine appeared to have caused the animals to develop immunity to the virus … Han said that he began the subterfuge to cover up a sample mix-up that he had made years before.

But this high profile case stands alone, with the vast majority of scientific fraud going unpunished, and typically resulting only in minor fines or suspension. That is exactly what Nature says stands out:

Han’s harsh sentence raises questions about how alleged research fraud is handled in the United States, from decisions about whether to prosecute to the types of punishments imposed by grant-making agencies.

The only reason this case led to jail time and a serious response is because Sen. Chuck Grassley took personal interest in the case:

[…] criminal prosecution is unusual for a “medium-level” fraud case such as Han’s. “In most cases, I don’t think it would have been done. But Senator Grassley cares deeply about these issues and wanted to make that point.”

“This seems like a very light penalty for a doctor who purposely tampered with a research trial and directly caused millions of taxpayer dollars to be wasted on fraudulent studies,” Grassley wrote in a February 2014 letter to the ORI.

The seriousness of fraudulent science research is indeed on a grand scale, and could cost lives.

But most of it goes unpunished because the system has inherently been captured by corporate interests who are not just biased, but who are steering a global agenda backed by favorable studies. Nature reports:

The very few researchers who face criminal charges are not necessarily those who have caused the most harm to other scientists’ careers, or to science generally. “We’re so preoccupied with major cases and so subject to policy pressure, we’ve lost sight of the larger picture,” says Nicholas Steneck, an expert in research integrity at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor.

In theory, the US Office of Research Integrity (ORI), which falls under the Dept. of Human Health Services, is supposed to investigate fraud and create accountability for misconduct – but in practice it ridiculously has no power to do so.

The ORI cannot directly investigate suspected fraud or misconduct; it is limited to overseeing probes by the institutions that employ researchers suspected of wrongdoing [however] … the ORI can impose funding bans…

Like so many other things, it is politically taboo to talk about the extent of corporate influence – though it is pervasive – over watchdogs, government approval and research – even when scientists admitted simply making up data to fit the model.

Several major editors have blown the whistle on the epidemic level of untrustworthy and unreliable published research. Lancet editor Richard Horton says the problems are system wide:

“The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness.” (source)

Horton also made scathing remarks about the biased system of peer review back in 2000:

The mistake, of course, is to have thought that peer review was any more than a crude means of discovering the acceptability — not the validity — of a new finding. Editors and scientists alike insist on the pivotal importance of peer review. We portray peer review to the public as a quasi-sacred process that helps to make science our most objective truth teller. But we know that the system of peer review is biased, unjust, unaccountable, incomplete, easily fixed, often insulting, usually ignorant, occasionally foolish, and frequently wrong. (source)

This den of vipers is nearly as protected as the “Too Big to Fail” Wall Street crowd, though perhaps putting forward scapegoats to take the fall for getting caught just comes that much more naturally to research work.