Have you ever wondered why they claimed to have walked on the moon in 1969, on the very first attempt, even though right here on earth Mt. Everest and the South Pole took numerous tries before success, allegedly accomplishing this amazing feat with fifty year older technology (a modern day cell phone has one million times more computing power than all of NASA did back then), yet fifty years later the farthest people can travel from the Earth is only 1/1000th the distance, despite there being five decades more advancements in rockets and computers?
If forty-two years after Lindbergh first flew solo across the Atlantic ocean men were walking on the moon, then fifty years after moon travel shouldn’t there be visitors to another solar system by now, having been to Mars ten years after the moon, forty years ago (which never happened), and shouldn’t there then be numerous bases on the moon today by various nations (of which there are none) five decades later?
Has there ever been a genuine technological achievement in the entire history of the world, such as the automobile, airplane, or nuclear power, which could not be duplicated by any nation on earth and far surpassed fifty years after it was first allegedly accomplished? The answer is a resounding no. Seeing how it is impossible for technology to go backwards and today they can only send people 1/1000th the distance from the Earth as was claimed fifty years ago on the very first attempt with five decades older technology, the only logical conclusion is that the 1969 claim was falsified.
Governments have lied and used false propaganda numerous times before, so we should not be surprised by this. During the incredible civil unrest caused by the highly unpopular Vietnam War at the time, a successful moon landing would give the American public something most needed to cheer about. The only way to assure success, and not risk killing the crews on live television during the most dangerous untried mission of all time, which is still impossible today, much less fifty years ago, was simply to stage it, like a bluff in poker. If it were not for people’s religious attachment to the emotionally charged event, they would easily see the truth of the fraud for the obvious technological reasons I just gave. Instead, telling them the truth is like taking candy away from a child. The reason why I pursue this matter so relentlessly is because once I realized that the grand event was indeed falsified, it sickens my soul to such a degree that I feel enormously compelled to bring this crime into the light for the most needed betterment of lost humanity.
“The bitterest truth,
is better than the sweetest lie.”
-Men in Black 3–
“All Truth passes through three stages . . .
First, it is ridiculed . . .
Then, it is violently opposed . . .
Finally, it is accepted as self-evident.”
“In an age of universal deceit,
telling the Truth is a revolutionary act.”
“Whoever controls the past, controls the future.”
“One of the saddest lessons of history is this:
If we’ve been bamboozled long enough,
we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle.
We’re no longer interested in finding out the Truth.
The bamboozle has captured us.
It’s simply too painful to acknowledge,
even to ourselves,
that we’ve been taken.
Once you give a charlatan power over you,
you almost never get it back.”
“It is easier to fool people
than to convince them that they have been fooled.”
Life is not so much a battle between right and wrong, as it is a battle between Truth and Lies, as this generally precedes, and ultimately leads to, good or evil. Truth leads to good. Lies lead to evil. Life is wonderfully simple.
The simple fact is, half of all crimes are “conspiracies”. Half are done without forethought, in the heat of the emotion of the moment, and half are plotted out in advance, thus making them conspiracies. Those who would like the public to ignore half of all the crimes in the world by ridiculing those with an intellect to perceive such forethought frauds are simply those perpetrating the deceptions in the first place.
We have to understand that if a tiny spider, the size of a dime, can meticulously plan and trap its prey weeks in advance, then the human mind, if inclined to evil, can do so much more evil, so much farther in advance. Additionally, a lie, or conspiracy, is the only crime that can exist without tangible evidence. If someone is murdered, there is a dead body. If someone steals, there is the material possession lacking in one place and existing in another. Yet, when someone lies, where is it? A lie is the only crime that you cannot touch, that you cannot see. A lie is purely ethereal. This is why lies are the favorite misdeeds of habitual criminals. After all, out of all of the crimes committed in the world for which people are put in prison, how many of them are there for simply lying?
The origin of crime is the lie, or conspiracy, invented in advance of the iniquity, to cover up the wrongdoing before it is even committed. When crimes are committed on a national and international scale, then national and international lies, or conspiracies, are needed. This is why criminal multibillion-dollar corporations and governments have consolidated all television networks, magazines, and newspapers. It is to control your perception of reality, not to offer you reality. As someone who worked as senior editor in television news for two years, I can testify to this fact. We referred to our broadcast as a “show”, not “news”, simply because it was completely controlled from the top down like any corporation, where the “anchors” (readers) simply regurgitated the scripted words from unseen superiors. Don’t believe me? Simply watch the short, yet very revealing clip below and notice the network logos in the lower part of the screen (left and right) which reveal that ALL of the major networks (ABC, NBC, CBS, FOX,) are receiving the very same scripts from a CENTRAL authority above them. “Independent” News? . . . Give me a break!
Click HERE or below to see this amazing proof.
While the naïve studio audience being shown these clips laughed at the reality of the outrageousness of this blatant centralized control of information (also known as “intelligence”), when I watched the clip, my heart sank in horror within the depths of my soul as to the degree to which the average citizen is subject to their daily deliberate manipulations.
Highly respected and Pulitzer Prize winning “Watergate” reporter Carl Bernstein had this to say about exactly who it is who has central control over the media (intelligence) . . . The “Central Intelligence Agency” (CIA) of course . . . the very ones who staged the “moon missions” through their favorite manipulative tool . . . Television . . .
“More than 400 American ‘journalists’ (that we know of) have secretly carried out assignments for the Central Intelligence Agency, according to documents on file at CIA headquarters. In many instances, CIA documents show that ‘journalists’ were contracted to perform covert missions for the CIA with the consent of the managers of America’s leading news organizations. Among the executives (that we know of) who lent their cooperation to the CIA, were the heads of Time Magazine, Newsweek, the New York Times, ABC, NBC, CBS, the Associate Press, United Press International, and Reuters.”
I think that just about covers everyone.
(CNN, FOX, MSNBC, and USA Today are not on the list simply because they did not exist at the time of his quote.)
If a President says that their loathing of dishonest information is against the “Media” and not the CIA, they fail to recognize, or at least acknowledge for reasons of personal safety, that they are one and the same thing. The media is controlled by the CIA (as you just read above), whose native language, as spies, is lies. The perhaps once honorable agency, like many others, first initiated to protect American citizens from foreign adversaries, has been turned against them, like a rabid dog on their owner, spending taxpayer’s hard earned money to lie to them without their consent, breaking federal law, which forbids domestic propaganda, as well as lying though the medium of television, of which the “moon landings” were the climax thereof.
If a President is serious about “Ethics Reform”, then what better Rallying Cry of the Ages than to inform the citizenry that the corrupt and out of control “Federal Government” took their hard earned money (about $1000 per person in today’s dollars) to lie to them about the “moon landings” without their consent. Once every American knows of this outrageous Federal Government fraud, any President will have an Ethics Reform Mandate unlike any in all of American history. If the Truth about the “moon landings” is swept under the rug again and again, like countless Presidential cowards have done before, then America’s honorable reputation will be forever sealed with permanent criminality and corruption.
In order to improve America, you have to first tear down decaying infrastructure, methodology, and corruption. This convenient lie of the Nixon administration must be humbly acknowledged by the leaders of America in order for our country to start fresh, otherwise we are just painting over mold that will infest our future. To confess sin is Nobel. It is the very reason why President Kennedy had unprecedentedly high approval ratings, because he acknowledged his and his country’s mistakes.
The fact is, if it were so easy to go to the moon with 1960’s technology fifty years ago, on the very first attempt, then there would be manned bases there by now and there would have been a man on Mars twenty-five years ago. The fact that there are still not moon bases to this day, with half a century more advancements in rocketry and computers, is proof itself that traveling to the moon still cannot be done, today, much less in the 1960’s with 1/millionth the computing power in all of NASA than is found in a modern day cell phone. Claiming that they went 1000 times farther, with five decades older technology, than the farthest astronaut can travel today, with half a century more advancements in rockets and computers, on the very first attempt, simply defies logic. This is like saying Charles Lindbergh flew across the Atlantic in 1927, yet the feat could not be repeated by any nation on earth, including the one who made the original claim, fifty years later, even though, in reality, fifty years later, millions of airplanes, one hundred times larger and one million times more advanced, were flying over the Atlantic. This notion is completely illogical regarding the perpetual advancement of technology, yet this is what we are supposed to believe, through misplaced and manipulated patriotism, regarding the alleged “moon landings” of the 1960’s, a feat which is only estimated to be “duplicated” seventy years later . . . at the earliest. Has there ever been a time in recorded history in which such a technological advancement was made yet could not be repeated for seventy years?
This alone should show you the Truth.
Why do so many smart people believe this lie? Because they want to. They want to believe this lie. Believing this lie means that they live in a better world than they actually do. Yet the fact is, they do not. The number one reason I hear from intelligent, yet disbelieving critics of the moon landing fraud, is that, “No one would ever do such a dishonest thing as lying about such an important accomplishment”. Really? They forget that they live in a world full of unthinkable child molestation, vicious murder, hateful racism, deplorable rape, and horrific million-man genocide. In a world such as this, what is all of this in minor comparison to merely cheating in a contest, as so many people have done before? In these peoples’ longing to be part of a society of pride boosting miraculous science, misguided self-proclaimed “intellectuals” fail to see the plainness of this simple fact:
Technology does not go backwards.
Again, if it were so easy to go to the moon in the 1960’s on the very first attempt with 1/millionth less computing power in all of NASA than is found in a modern cell phone, a distance which is 1000 times farther than the most advanced modern manned rocket can travel today, then not only would the feat be easily and routinely repeatable today, there would be lunar bases there by now, nearly five decades later.
Technology does not go backwards!
The South Pole has temperatures that reach below 100 degrees Fahrenheit (-73 C) and nearly continual hurricane force winds, yet there are bases there today. Why? Because it is humanly possible. If it were humanly possible to reach the moon, fifty years ago or today, there too would be bases there right now. The fact that there are not, with half a century more advancements in rockets and computers, is proof itself that it simply cannot be done, not even today, and especially not with fifty years older technology. The problem is, you have to be willing to give up this deep emotional imprinting, in pursuit of Honor and Truth, in order to see the plainness of this harsh and startling reality.
After Columbus arrived in the “New World”, within two years, numerous other European nations traveled to the Americas. After Lewis and Clark ventured to the American west, shortly thereafter, citizens everywhere traveled to the American west. After the Wright brothers accomplished powered flight, within two years, numerous others repeated their technological accomplishment.
Charles Lindbergh first flew across the Atlantic in an airplane in 1927. Fifty years later, there were millions of airplanes flying across the Atlantic. In comparison, the 747 aircraft, built after seventy years of successful aviation history and millions of manufactured aircraft, which was developed with a decade newer technology than that of the “moon” spacecraft (the first ever vehicle to allegedly take men to another world), yet the 747 took one year longer to construct than the “moon landing” equipment did to merely fly seven miles above the earth and endured over 160 failed engine attempts before it finally got off of the ground!
When it comes to perceiving the Truth in a world full of lies, historically, the majority has always been deceived, and later proved wrong, by the minority of their contemporaries, whom they persecuted and considered deluded at the time, when in fact, it was the majority who were misled.
Does a person know it when they are deceived?
No, they do not.
You see, you can be sincere . . .
And be sincerely wrong.
The majority of scientists thought the world was flat. The majority of astronomers thought the Earth was the center of the universe. The majority of physicians thought bleeding the sickness out of a person was a cure. The majority of Americans thought Nixon was honest. Likewise, a majority of scientists, astronomers, physicians, and Americans think the moon landings were real, yet their titles and majority do not equal Truth, as history has well proven . . . and will prove again.
Why is it so difficult for them to see the Truth?
Very simple . . .
“The Pride of your heart has deceived you.”
Pride is simply the un-willingness to be wrong, just as humility is the willingness to be wrong. The great thing about being wrong, which is what I had to finally admit about the “moon landings”, is that I am learning something new, and I am no longer walking through life in error. The bad thing about being right all the time, is that I cannot learn anything new, and I am living my life in a self-deceived state, which is the very worst form of deception.
When someone else deceives me, if I try hard enough, I can eventually figure it out, after all, I know that other people cannot be trusted all of the time. Yet when I am self-deceived, it is nearly impossible for me to overcome this, because the person I am relying on for “facts” is myself . . . and of course I can trust myself . . . even when I am wrong.
When someone considers themself smart, this is the first step towards their ignorance. They boast about their years of experience and degrees, and thereby pour concrete around their finite knowledge, unknowingly calling their stone mound of limited facts, the entire universe of Truth. If you try to tell them they are wrong, they will defend their post to their emotional and intellectual death at all cost, all the while attempting to defile you with their venomous words for pointing out their error, even though you are right and merely trying to help them.
Just like OJ Simpson’s lawyers (who later admitted they knew of his guilt and were only “doing their job”), no matter how plain the evidence, their pride-filled manipulative lawyer-like minds have an explanation for why the Truth is a lie, and why lies are the truth, otherwise they would be forced to admit their error, which their pride will not allow, and which blinds them from perceiving the unwanted reality. With every evidence submitted to them as to why the moon landings were indeed falsified, no matter how condemning and obvious, there is always a zealous counter-explanation from them to throw away the Truth and institute a lie in its place, in order for them to keep their dying status quo fantasy alive.
Just because someone has an explanation for every piece of condemning evidence,
(like OJ Simpson’s lawyers and “moon landing” defenders)
does not mean that the explanations are True.
Rather than looking for the Truth (at the unacceptable cost of being wrong), the majority of people (because of their blinding pride in the accomplishments of themselves and like-minded others), instead “Gather around them a great number of teachers to tell them what their itching ears want to hear”. (2nd Timothy 4:3) In other words, rather than looking for the Truth, they look for people to agree with what they already believe, so as to prove themselves right.
The real question is, if you had cancer, would you want to know? . . . Or would you rather have your doctor lie to you and tell you that everything was just fine . . . even though it really was not? Sometimes you have to cut off a diseased limb to save your life. The same is True of the “moon landings”. A costly admission, yet a saving one as well.
If the “moon missions” were real, then they hold a place of prominence in the annals of human history. If they were not real, and One Hundred Fifty Billion Dollars (in today’s value) was embezzled from the taxpayers to lie to the very ones who funded the missions, then this would actually be a more significant moment in history than if they had actually gone!
Thusly, this Great Truth, the faking of the moon missions out of pride, arrogance, and greed, is being withheld by the minority of government leaders against the vast majority of citizens.
Because they think they are better than the rest of us.
It is at this point that I highly recommend you watch the film (by clicking on the title or the window below) which I first made on this subject called “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon”, so that you can not only fully comprehend the historical as well as hidden facts of this event, yet also understand my earnest motives for bringing this sad chapter of American history into the light, for the betterment of future generations, and to prevent such error from forever smearing America’s once honorable reputation into once that is permanently criminal.
Until the Truth comes out about the “moon landings”, humanity’s character, and especially that of America, will be forever stunted from growth and advancement, the very aid of which would come by simply admitting this very mistake with its deplorable dishonesty. Unless we are willing to face and confess the cold hard facts of our errors, much like a disciplined athlete rejecting appealing yet detrimental desserts, we will be under the spell, and complete control of, this diabolical hidden minority of government leaders who represent themselves rather than the people.
The falsified “moon landings” are utter proof that this is the state in which America lives today, the very admission of which would lead to these unscrupulous leaders’ demise. This is why there are more than a hundred websites and films in existence today, specifically dedicated to squashing the emerging Truth of the “moon landings” blatant and deplorable falsification. The fact is, if the moon landings are so “obviously” real, then anyone who says otherwise is an idiot. Why then are there more than a hundred websites and videos, which took tens of thousands of hours to produce, specifically designed to refute the insane rantings of morons? As Shakespeare so famously said, “Thou does protest too much.” Another historical commentator said this . . .
“The likelihood of one individual being right, increases in direct proportion to the intensity with which others are trying to prove him wrong.”
Even former president Clinton, once holding the (allegedly) highest office in the land, doubts the authenticity of the moon landings. On Page 156 of his autobiography “My Life” he states:
“Just a month before, Apollo 11 astronauts Buzz Aldrin and Neil Armstrong had left their colleague, Michael Collins, aboard spaceship Columbia and ‘walked on the moon’, beating by five months President Kennedy’s goal of putting a man on the moon before the decade was out. The old carpenter asked me if I really believed it happened. I said sure, I saw it on ‘television’. He disagreed; he said that he didn’t believe it for a minute, that ‘them television fellers’ could make things look real that weren’t. Back then, I thought he was a crank. During my eight years in Washington, I saw some things on TV that made me wonder if he wasn’t ahead of his time.”
If a president of the United States is finally admitting his doubts as to the authenticity of the “moon landings” (albeit, after he safely left office) and is calling those who perceive the Truth of the event “ahead of their time”, shouldn’t you also reconsider your thinking on the matter, if you haven’t already?
After watching this inaugural program suggesting a moon landing fraud, I went to my bedroom wall shrine of “moon landing” pictures and looked, for the very first time, with new eyes, at theses surprisingly telling photographs. Sure enough, just like Mr. Kaysing had said, stunning evidence of photographic anomalies were hidden in plain sight! (They say that this is the very best place to hide something investigators are looking for!) I just had to have “eyes that see”, after all, it had been historically said that most people “have eyes that do not see, and ears that do not hear”.
This tremendous oversight of mine is likened to a household salt shaker always being placed in the same place for ten years; left kitchen cabinet, on the third shelf, on the left side. If a family member inadvertently moves it to the same left kitchen cabinet, likewise on the third shelf, yet on the right side instead of on the left, you do not see it, even though it is right there in front of your eyes! There you stand, with the cabinet door wide open, the salt shaker right in front of you, only inches away (though on the right side of the same shelf where you always looked rather than on the left, where you were conditioned to not look), and you do not see it! Just as such, there I was, looking at the same pictures of the alleged moon landings, over and over again for, a full decade, yet not seeing quite obvious inconsistencies and abnormalities that would quickly give away the deceptive criminality of the event, if only I would look beyond my programming.
In a way, like naïve Adam and Eve, you can’t blame people for initially being deceived, after all, which is a more pleasant realm in which to live, one in which your country continually lies about history and spending, or one in which your country is honorable and honest? Naturally, most people would prefer to live in the latter, so they see the latter, just as we unconsciously overlook the flaws in a new romantic acquaintance with whom we are emotionally infatuated.
Fortunately, ten years after seeing the revealing interview with former NASA contractor William Kaysing at the age of fourteen, then at the age of twenty-four, I had become a filmmaker, and happened to be editing a movie one day for the very producer of the program I had seen ten years earlier which first brought to light the moon landing fraud to my attention. “Do you remember that man you had on your program who said that the moon landings were fake?” I asked the producer, “What is his name? I’d like to talk with him.” The rest is history.
I went from being the biggest fan of the “moon landings”, to becoming their most outspoken critic. Why? Because I was open-minded and willing to be wrong when the evidence presented itself to the contrary of my first opinion, even if that evidence was unpredicted, unprecedented, and quite discouraging.
Hitler, the master of propaganda, said that it was actually easier to get away with a gigantic deception rather than a small one, because small lies are commonplace, and therefore anticipated, so that no one would expect or foresee the audacity of a grand deception. This is precisely the psychological tactic that was used by the CIA in precipitating and maintaining the monumental, yet very simple, lie of the “moon landings”.
During the domestically injurious riots protesting the Vietnam War, president Nixon decided that a unifying pep rally of a successful “moon landing” was just what the sickly American patient needed. Do you really think that Nixon was going to risk killing three “National Heroes” on live worldwide television, when simply failing to rescue kidnapped hostages would ruin your presidency for life (and especially your potential second term) as it did President Carter a few years later? How then could Nixon absolutely guarantee a successful “moon mission”? . . . To stage it . . . just like a skilled poker player’s bluff, not to mention that it was technologically impossible at the time to begin with, just as it is today, even with fifty years more advancements in computers and rockets. In fact, according to NASA contractor William Kaysing, who worked for six years on the Apollo program with high security clearance, a classified interdepartmental memo, which he personally read and edited, estimated the likelihood of a successful manned moon mission on the first attempt at a mere one in ten thousand chance. As NASA’s own staff at the time readily admitted was their standard motto in such instances, “If you can’t make it, fake it.”
Some assume that if the Soviet Union (Russian) or Chinese intelligence agencies found out that the American “moon landings” were fraudulent, they would immediately “spill the beans” (tell the truth) to the rest of the world without giving the highly important matter much deeper thought. This is simply not the case, and again, thinking only one step farther than programmed to do so, reveals the actual Truth. If wars are created for the profiteering of the “Military Industrial Complex”, as many forward thinking people including President Eisenhower now realize, then foreign “adversaries” of the United States may only be profitable creations thereof, solely existing in the propagandized minds of Americans, just as the “moon landings” did, brought about through the deceptive CIA’s mainstream media outlets, done so to benefit the billionaire military manufacturers, who in turn, help get their like-minded politicians elected, thus perpetuating this endless cycle of lucrative lies which mutually feed corrupted bureaucrats and corporate contractors alike.
Think about it: America has been engaged in a profitable war of some kind for 90% of its short history, yet never with Russia or China. As such, Russia and China are, in fact, allies of the United States, despite mainstream media and CIA fabrications which portray them, for financial gain, as “adversaries”, as trillions of dollars in regular annual mutually beneficial trading proves. (Just imagine a fake wrestling match in which both sides are paid by the same party.) This being the case, these overseas entities would not bring the Truth of such an American scandal as the moon landing fraud into the light to injure such an important monetary trading partner toward their own financial loss, not to mention that their own hidden skeletons would then be forced out of the closet in retaliation. Any “bad blood” the United States appears to have with these foreign powers is merely staged for the very purpose of keeping their complicity a secret, and the trillions of dollars in profitable military spending flowing.
Even if these two “super-powers” were actual enemies of America (which they are not), they still would not expose the Truth about the “moon missions”. For example, if I had a picture of a famous world leader with a prostitute, would it be more profitable for me to give the picture away to the media for free, or rather to blackmail the entrapped world leader, year after year, with ever increasing tolls? If such countries really were enemies of America and had proof of the moon landing fraud, which I suspect they probably do by now, it would serve their interests much more to keep such knowledge to themselves and blackmail the United States with the embarrassing information, year after year, administration after administration, to get the behind-the-scenes negotiations to favor them, whether it regards trade, arms, debt, or anything else they so desire. This is another good reason why the Truth coming out about the moon landing fraud would be beneficial for America. It would put an end to any potential blackmail about this past matter from foreign powers.
The fact is, there were no “independent” tracking stations for the Apollo missions. The only entities that had such capability were the United States’ own government agencies (who orchestrated the deception to begin with) and the aforementioned countries, who profited from keeping the secret. Additionally, NASA launched the “Tetra-A” satellite shortly before the Apollo missions, specifically designed to “simulate transmissions coming from the moon” so that the ground crews could rehearse the “moon landings” during their many simulations. Surreptitiously, it was purported that the Tetra-A satellite “accidentally burned up” in the earth’s atmosphere just before the first alleged moon mission, that way the government satellite could secretly still be in service, performing the same simulation function during the fake moon missions, convincing even the staff at NASA of their authenticity. In fact, an elderly retired NASA crew member recently acknowledged that . . .
“Our computers could tell no difference whatsoever between a ‘real’ and a ‘simulated’ moon mission.”
From Wikipedia regarding The Apollo Fraud:
“Some people insist that the Apollo moon landings were a Cold War deception of the Nixon administration. However, ’empirical’ evidence is readily available to show that manned moon landings did occur. Anyone on earth with an appropriate laser and telescope system can apparently bounce laser beams off three retro-reflector arrays reported to be left on the moon by Apollo 11, 14, and 15, suggesting deployment of the lunar laser ranging equipment at asserted Apollo moon landing sites, implying equipment constructed on earth was transported to the surface of the moon. In addition, in August 2009, NASA’s lunar reconnaissance orbiter claimed to send back high-resolution photos of the estimated Apollo landing sites. These government issued pictures show not only what is reported to be the faint shadows of the descent stages of the lunar landers allegedly left behind, but also apparent tracks of the astronauts’ walking paths nearby in the lunar dust.”
When they use statements like “empirical evidence (Because the Emperor says so?) is readily available to show that the manned moon landings did occur”, it not only shows their arrogance (which, in and of itself, demonstrates their blindness to the facts), it also exemplifies their desperation to make an argument, that is so much losing ground, that they have to resort to the tactic of claiming that if you don’t agree with them, you are somehow deficient in intelligence. Again, if the “moon landings” are so obviously real (even though they cannot be repeated today with fifty years more advanced technology, and the farthest a man can travel from the earth to the moon today is only 1/1000th as far as they allegedly did half a century ago with antiquated equipment on the very first attempt), and there is no robust proof whatsoever of the missions deliberate falsification, then there would be no need whatsoever for the hundred plus films and websites, which took tens of thousands of hours to produce, solely dedicated to reassure the public of the “moon landings” genuineness! The fact that there are, is proof itself that mounting evidence does exist which proves the “moon missions” to be a CIA forgery, otherwise the deceptively claimed “obviousness” of their authenticity would speak for itself, without the repeated need of hundreds of websites and films to defend them. When a structure needs such continual precarious support and maintenance, this alone is evidence that the structure itself is not sound to begin with.
First of all, it was proven in 1962 that a laser can be bounced and calibrated off of the moon without a manmade reflector thereon, simply due to the reflectivity of the lunar surface. NASA just cleverly designated these reflective locations as “landing sites” for the very purpose of contriving this evidence. Furthermore, Russia put a manmade mirror on the moon’s surface during the same time of the “Apollo” missions, using instead an un-manned probe that would not have to suffer the biological ravages of lethal space radiation en route, one of the main reasons NASA was, and still is, unable to send humans to the moon. Don’t believe me? Click HERE to see the March 1959 issue, Volume 200, Number 3, of the magazine “Scientific American”, article entitled “Radiation Belts Around the Earth”, to see how deadly and impenetrable space radiation is beyond the safety of low earth orbit where the space station currently resides (at an altitude of merely 250 miles above the earth, the moon being about 239,000 miles away, or roughly 1000 Times farther). Additionally, seeing how all of these lasers have their data computer controlled, it would only take one computer hacker to manipulate the information shown on a viewing screen, making even the employees of NASA ignorant of the actual facts. (This was precisely the case at “mission control” during the “moon missions”, where dozens of computer “operators”, actually just read the contrived preprogrammed data on their screens like news anchors, who do not write their own words, openly admitting afterwards that they could tell no difference whatsoever between a “real” flight and a “simulation”.)
Secondly, to say that additional “new” photographs from the criminal NASA are evidence that “prove” the alleged moon landings were real . . . is laughable. NASA already faked high resolution, full body pictures, of an astronaut supposedly standing right on the “moon’s surface” nearly fifty years ago, so what is it to fake additional pictures now, with almost five decades better “Photoshop” technology, of such simple things as alleged tiny shadows of lunar landers or supposed faint footpaths, from miles above the moon’s surface, allegedly taken from untrustworthy NASA’s orbiting satellites? These diehard believers are just seeing what they want to see, like a naïve spouse of a cheating partner, accepting the fox’s evidence that they didn’t steal a chicken.
Additional arguments against the fraud are reported to be the hundreds of thousands of people throughout the industry who contributed to the “moon missions”, who allegedly would have been informed of the fraud and kept it a secret. Again, seemingly a reasonable argument, yet it is not with only a little extra thought. Do you really think the CIA would be so careless as to tell hundreds of thousands of low-level contractors the goings-on of a top-top-secret project? Would the CIA really be so inept as to tell the person making the rocket’s door handle, or the glove or the boot of the spacesuit, that they were secretly faking the moon landings and to be sure not to tell anyone?! Do we really think the CIA is stupid enough to tell hundreds of thousands of low-level workers something they wanted to keep as a strict secret?! Furthermore, to say that “because my uncle worked at NASA and believed the ‘moon landings’ were real is proof that they were real”, is like saying that because my uncle worked as a vender at the Super Bowl and believed that the game was honest, that this is proof that the football players didn’t cheat in their game.
Just like a pyramid of power in any business, what the employee, the manager, and the regional manager knows about the business’ actual agenda, is completely different than what the CEO at the very top knows. Remember, there were only three people (“trusted” government employees) who were actually there at the time of the “moon missions”, with no independent press coverage whatsoever. As demonstrated in my film “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon”, the three crew members were indeed on the rocket, they did launch into earth orbit on July 16th, 1969 (to attain realistic “zero gravity” flight photography within the spacecraft), they did splash down in the ocean eight days later (to establish the authenticity), yet the rest of the mission, everything beyond earth orbit (which is only as far as astronauts can go today with fifty years more advanced technology), was completely contrived, like a masterful illusionist, by satellite data manipulation, complete media control, and professional movie sets. After all, what is easier to do, to actually build a rocket and travel to another planet with 1960’s technology on the very first attempt, or to simply make a movie set about it? The age-old argument “The simplest explanation is the True one“, which many Apollo proponents deceptively use to suggest the “moon missions” were real, actually proves the fraud instead!
The simple fact is, it is easier to fake a moon mission than to actually do one . . . the exact reason why the recent film “The Martian” was filmed in an earthly simulated television studio, rather than on Mars.
Another overlooked fact is that, according to their own “Scientific Method”, a “Scientific” claim, such as the “manned moon landings” of the 1960’s, in order to be considered authentic, must be Independently Verified and Duplicated by a Third Party, which has never been done regarding the “Apollo” missions, as only the corrupt United States government, alone, has claimed that this feat was possible, on the very first attempt, with antiquated 1960’s technology, even though no nation on earth can repeat the claim, even with fifty years more advancements in rockets and computers. This is precisely why, if someone today made the claim of perfecting “cold fusion”, yet said that they could not repeat their successful experiment for another fifty years, they would be laughed off of the planet . . . Yet . . . This is not the standard for the “manned moon landing” claims of America in the 1960’s, which cannot be repeated by any nation on earth, even fifty years later, when today the farthest NASA can send an astronaut is only 1/1000th the distance as they claimed to have done on the first try half a century ago! This “event” has become a god of America’s greatness, causing even “scientific intellectuals” to intentionally overlook highly valid criticism thereof, because it insults their self-aggrandized narcissistic idol.
Some of the best evidence proving the fraud is the fact that in 1998, when the space shuttle flew to its highest altitude ever, 365 miles, one third higher than they normally flew, mission control asked the crew to descend to a lower altitude due to lethal space radiation they encountered, by approaching too close to the “Van Allen Radiation Belts”, which don’t even begin until one thousand miles altitude (and continue for an additional 25,000 miles). That is to say, they were 635 miles away from radiation that was so intense, that the crew reported they could see the radiation with their eyes closed as sparks of light hitting the retinas of their closed eyes, and were subsequently told to descend away from it. When this happened, CNN inadvertently and unknowingly, reported the moon landing fraud by stating . . .
“The radiation belt surrounding earth is more dangerous than previously believed.”
Apparently, not a single journalist on the entire planet figured out, except for myself, that this statement totally contradicts the authenticity of the “moon landings” . . . Here’s why . . .
The only time in world history when human beings have claimed to have traveled through the 25,000 mile thick radiation field called the “Van Allen Radiation Belts” (which, unbeknownst to most, surrounds the Earth starting at an altitude of one thousand miles and extends 25,000 miles beyond that) is during the alleged Apollo “moon missions”, as all other manned missions, from every country on earth, including the United States (such as Gemini, Mercury, Soyuz, Skylab, the Space Shuttle, and the current International Space Station), all orbited about 750 miles below this dangerous radiation field (merely 250 miles above the Earth’s surface), specifically out of safety concerns for the lethal radiation above them. Even airline crews, 240 miles below this orbital altitude, are subject to health concerns from this hazardous radiation, so all the more for astronauts, twenty times higher than they at merely 250 miles above the earth in the space shuttle and space station.
Why is it then that Space Shuttle astronauts, some 635 miles away from this intense radiation, twenty-nine years after the first alleged moon mission, knew more about this radiation than the Apollo astronauts who claimed they were in the middle of it to the moon and back? Remember, the Space Shuttle crew’s recent discovery proves that this large radiation field is “more dangerous than previously believed”. What is “previously believed” if not based on the previous reports from the “experts” of the radiation field, the Apollo crews, who were allegedly the only ones in all of world history to have ever traveled through this radiation, with no ill health effects of any kind and no reports of the visible sparks of radiation being seen, as were later reported by the Shuttle crew from 635 miles away from the radiation!
Of course, this is simply not possible if the “moon missions” were real.
What does this mean?
It means that the “moon mission” astronauts, who previously claimed to have been inside of this large radiation field lied about being there! Of course, if the “Apollo” crews never went through the Van Allen Radiation Belt, as this contradictory report reveals, then they certainly could not have gone to the moon either, which the traversing of this radiation would require. This is precisely why, nearly fifty years later, all that astronauts from any nation on earth can do, including the United States, is orbit the earth at about 250 miles altitude. Seeing how the Space shuttle has killed fourteen people just orbiting at 250 miles above the Earth, and that with well proven, three decades newer technology than the “Apollo” program had, it is quite a conundrum that thirty years earlier, with antiquated untried machinery, NASA claims to have gone 1000 Times farther, six times, without any fatalities or radiation problems whatsoever, and that with inaugural equipment.
According to the highly esteemed “National Research Council”, a private nonprofit scientific think-tank which submits recommendations to NASA based on the latest scientific findings, radiation beyond Earth orbit is so dangerous that “returning to the moon” is deemed impossible until better ways are found to protect astronauts from this lethal radiation. The question is, if the NRC says that “returning” to the moon is impossible today until better ways are found to protect astronauts from lethal space radiation beyond earth orbit (such as the Van Allen Radiation Belts), then how did men reach the moon on their very first attempt with 1960’s technology, or better still, why not simply use the same outstanding methodology and equipment that the supposed first moon crews had to protect themselves from the lethal space radiation rather than reinventing the wheel? (You can read their report by clicking HERE.)
Likewise, when Bush Jr. was president, he went on national television and proclaimed that “The United States will return to the moon as a logical first step to Mars and beyond”. Did no one besides me notice that if they already really went to the moon six times, why would they need to do a “first” step over again for the seventh time? He was even so bold as to go on to say that “First we will need to learn how to protect astronauts from lethal space radiation.” Am I the only one curious enough to ask, “Why not do it the same way that worked so well the first time they went to the moon in 1969?”
Why does no journalist, except me, connect the obvious dots with this very revealing information? Because the dots lead to a horrific Truth that would appall the entire American nation, demanding that their government be re-formed. It is simply because “journalists” are part of the CIA’s media empire that they do not report anything that would cause their very own undoing.
In December of 2014, NASA sent their brand new “Orion” spacecraft, un-manned, directly into the Van Allen Radiation Belt, to a 3,600 mile altitude, and then promptly u-turned it for a return to earth.
What is worth studying at 3,600 miles?
The Van Allen Radiation Belts.
According to NASA, the purpose of the “Orion” mission was to . . . “to test the instruments”. What “instruments” were onboard the Orion spacecraft? Two Geiger Counters to measure the radiation inside of the radiation belts that are necessary to traverse to reach the moon.
Didn’t NASA already have these measurements decades ago from the Apollo moon missions, if indeed men actually went through the radiation belts to the moon and back? Why is it so important to “test the instruments” at a 3,600 mile altitude inside of the radiation belts? . . .
To see if humans can survive transversing it . . .
. . . for the very first time!
Apparently today’s new generation of NASA engineers, some in their twenty’s, have stumbled upon this significant NASA contradiction. Though they were probably led into the space exploration field by the motivation of the seemingly easy “moon missions” of the 1960’s, the fact that such an acclaimed feat cannot be repeated today, with five decades more advanced technology, and that aside from theses alleged “moon missions” of the Nixon administration, no one has ever gone more than 400 miles away from the earth in the nearly fifty years since, the trip to the moon being 1000 Times farther than the space station is today, must make their positions with this newly discovered Truth quite precarious.
Kelly Smith, one of these twenty-ish engineers, was selected as the official “Orion” mission spokesperson in the following NASA video press release. Notice that at 43 seconds into the film, Smith confirms that the radiation belts are made up of “Extreme Radiation”. At time 3:06 he again refers to the belts as “Dangerous Radiation”. Finally at time 3:36, for the third time, Smith plainly states . . .
“We must solves these (radiation) challenges before we send people through this region of space.”
The question is, if the solution to the dangerous radiation belt problem has yet to be invented (“We must solves these challenges before we send people through this region of space.”), then how is it that the Apollo crews during their alleged “moon missions” went through this dangerous and extreme radiation nearly fifty years ago when the necessary equipment to survive doing so has yet to be invented?! (“We must solves these challenges before we send people through this region of space.”)
When NASA sent publicly funded probes and spacecraft to measure the temperature of the sun and the amount of hydrogen in Jupiter’s atmosphere, this information was readily available to scientists and to the public, after all, why would a measurement of a part of nature be a secret? Likewise, the amount radiation in the Van Allen Radiation Belts which surround the Earth is simply a part of nature, and as such, there is no reason whatsoever why such elementary measurements of nature should be a government secret . . . unless disclosing such measurements would reveal the impossibility of the Apollo crews having gone through them and surviving with decades older technology, especially seeing how NASA just acknowledged, accidentally or otherwise, that such protection from this “Dangerous” and “Extreme” radiation has yet to be invented by the space agency and “must” be invented “before we send people through this region of space.”
Quite interesting . . . Yes?
James Van Allen, the discoverer of the radiation belts, originally said that they were “100-1000 times more radioactive than a lethal dose”! Under pressure from NASA, he dramatically recanted his original findings in order to make it appear as if the moon landings were possible. Don’t believe me? Below is the link to his original published findings in the respected national journal “Scientific American”, in which Van Allen spoke plainly about the radiation belts beyond earth orbit being “an obstacle for practical space travel to the moon and beyond”, just as Kelly Smith of the “Orion” mission did.
Van Allen himself said this, immediately after NASA sent probes with Geiger counters into the radiation belts in 1958:
“Our measurements show that the maximum radiation level as of 1958 is equivalent to between 10 and 100 REM per hour, depending on the still undetermined proportion of protons to electrons. Since a human being exposed for two days to even 10 REM would have only an even chance of survival, the radiation belts obviously present an obstacle to space flight.”
(The above comments are at the very end of the article.)
Occupational safety limits for radiation is 5 REM over an entire year, as the danger is calculated by the amount of REM and the period over which it is received, and thereby gradually absorbed, so that the body may have time to incrementally expel the radiation before it reaches a lethal level. Absorbing 5 REM of radiation in just an hour, rather than a year, is 24 times a lethal dose. 10 REM of radiation absorbed in an hour is therefore 48 times more lethal a dose than 10 REM gradually absorbed and expelled over two days (or 48 hours), which Van Allen himself said was already a lethal dose (as calculated by it killing 50 percent of those exposed to it). Rounding 48 times a lethal dose per hour in the radiation belts up to 50 (for the slightly longer than an hour trip through them to leave Earth orbit and reach the moon) and then doubling the amount for the return from the moon through the radiation belts again to reenter Earth orbit, this is, according to Van Allen himself, a minimum of 100 times a lethal dose and a maximum of 1000 times a lethal dose for the trip to the moon and back.
The “Apollo” spacecraft had inferior shielding (1/8th of an inch of aluminum) compared to that of a medical x-ray technician, who wears a much more effective lead vest (lead being prohibitive to launch into space because of its exceeding excessive weight), even though the radiation exposure to a chest x-ray is 1/5000th of the radiation exposure to the Van Allen radiation belts, and that only for a split second, rather than continually for more than two hours during the alleged trip to the moon and back. Some misinformed and grasping NASA fans have falsely claimed that the Apollo astronauts did not go through the radiation belts while others claim that they only went through weak fringe parts thereof (though NASA never made any such claims), yet this is a scientific impossibility unless the launches took place at the North or South Poles where there are small openings in the belts (as Van Allen clearly stated at the end of the above article), as there was no additional fuel available to zigzag around them and launching closest to the equator as possible, where the radiation belts are strongest, permitted the necessary fuel savings.
Launching at the poles would be virtually impossibility due to the cold temperatures, at least 50 degrees Fahrenheit (19 C) or more below safe launch temperatures (because the cold dramatically deteriorates sensitive launch equipment), as the Space Shuttle Challenger’s cold launch explosion at just 36 degrees Fahrenheit (2 C) already proved was deadly. What these diehard unresearched supporters of the fraud have inadvertently admitted, is that yes indeed the radiation belts are deadly, just as Van Allen and NASA’s own Kelly Smith acknowledged in the “Orion” mission video press release. By desperately saying the crews went around the radiation belts in a forlorn attempt to prove the missions were real (even though NASA claims the crews went right through the most intense part of the radiation), in their acknowledgement of the belt’s lethality, they have themselves unknowingly conceded that the missions were scientifically impossible.
Even self-proclaimed “moon” astronaut Alan Bean, when I interviewed him unprepared for my challenging questions, accidentally admitted on camera that he did not travel through the lethal Van Allen radiation belts (which he would have to in order to reach the moon). When I pointed out this error to him, he corrected himself by saying, “Maybe we did (go through the radiation belts)”. When I asked him if he experienced any unusual phenomenon from traveling through the radiation belts, he said “No”. When I pointed out to him that a crew of the space shuttle, decades after his alleged moon mission, on the highest altitude of any space shuttle flight, more than 600 miles away from just the beginning of the intense radiation belts, experienced radiation that was so severe, even from that great distance away, that they could see the radiation as sparks of lights through their closed eyelids, Bean then suddenly remembered seeing the same phenomenon! When I pointed out to him that I believed that this space shuttle crew was the first of any astronauts in history to report this strange optical radiation phenomenon, he changed his story a third time to keep up with the revelatory information, and immediately recanted what he had just said about seeing the radioactive “sparks of light” in the first place! . . . Absolutely amazing! (Did I mention the fact that each astronaut who was interviewed by me at length asked for Two Thousand Dollars an Hour in cash for the honor of being lied to?)
(You can also see at time 27:31 – 27:45 in “Astronauts Gone Wild” by clicking HERE, that Eugene Cernan said that the descent engine to the lunar surface was “very loud”, while Bean says that “you couldn’t hear it because of the vacuum of space”.)
Which is it guys?! Get your stories straight!
In August of 2009 it was reported, albeit as a news oddity (and it certainly was) that a “moon rock”, personally given to the president of the Netherlands by Neil Armstrong in 1969 (who supposedly hand picked it off of the moon’s surface himself), was opened forty years later from its hermitically sealed container by a curious museum curator after they had watched “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon”. Following microscopic examination, the rock was verified to actually be a forgery! (A deceptive “another worldly” looking piece of petrified wood instead!) Yet again, not a single journalist, except for myself, asked the question, “If the moon rocks are fake . . . What about the moon missions?” (You can read the story about the fake “moon rock” by clicking HERE.)
After Neil Armstrong’s departure from this mortal coil, in 2012, his widow found a “bag of moon souvenirs” in the back of his closet. The problem is, for Armstrong’s entire life, he said that these specific items were left on the moon! (Talk about “coming out of the closet”!) Again, more proof that the “moon missions” took place on earth was completely ignored by the media. (You can read the story by clicking HERE.)
When I discovered absolute proof (actual, on camera evidence) that the Apollo astronauts never left earth orbit (contained in a newly discovered unedited NASA reel which was never broadcast to the public; debuted in “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon” and showcased below) and presented this controversial videotape to a news director at NBC, he turned pale white, practically fainted, and collapsed in his chair exclaiming, “Oh, my God! It looks like we didn’t go to the moon!”
“I know”, I said, “What do we do?”
This man, who held the betterment of America in his hand, thought for a long time . . . and then eventually . . . “chickened out”. He said, “I cannot broadcast this with a clear conscious. It will cause a civil war. I will not be the one responsible for that.”
While I disagree that the public knowing the Truth about the “moon missions” would cause a civil war, Americans would probably demand immense government reform, or possibly a new institution thereof, as well as start investigating other matters of their yet uncovered dark corruption and deception. Naturally, government criminals would rather not get caught and preserve their underhanded way of life, which the release of this Truth would inevitably bring. This is precisely why my film has never been broadcast, only to be seen on DVD and Youtube. Instead, numerous networks (owned by bedfellows of the government) have broadcast a dozen full-length documentaries as to why my well-known film’s accusations are “unfounded”.
If more people would only view with an open, deprogrammed mind, “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon”, which contains newly discovered video evidence of the moon landing fraud, then they would see, with their own eyes, these recently uncovered unedited behind-the-scenes outtakes of false photography from the first “moon mission”, which prove the deception beyond any doubt. In fact, four out of five people who actually view this footage, who previously thought the alleged “moon landings” were real, recant their faith in the supposed mission’s authenticity. Thusly you can see why broadcasters are terrified to present this extremely condemning evidence to the public. If they did so, plainly acknowledging as the news director did that this proves the “moon missions” were a government deception, then not only would they be admitting the mainstream media’s own complicity in the fraud by being the means through which this lie was disseminated, the public would also call into question the very foundational integrity of the government, possibly leading to its immediate restructuring, as well as the media’s, for their own participation in this deplorable dishonesty.
The unedited outtakes of which I speak, were never broadcast to the public. In them, Neil Armstrong is using a one-foot diameter model of the Earth, inside of the spacecraft from low Earth orbit, to create the illusion for the television audience, that he and his crew are halfway to the moon, when they are, in reality, still in Earth orbit, from which they never left. (After all, this is as far as an astronaut can travel today, fifty years later.) This is absolute proof that, though they were on the rocket at launch and achieved Earth orbit, the crew never went any farther, again, just as far as they can go today, with half a century improvements in rockets and computers.
This revealing footage is even dated by NASA’s own computer clock as having taken place two days into Armstrong’s flight, when he is supposed to be halfway to the moon, or some “135,000 miles away from the Earth”, yet he and his crew are clearly shown in these revealing outtakes to still be in Earth orbit two days after the launch, and are instead, falsifying the television photography to deceive the viewing public as to their real location. The CIA is even heard on a private, third audio channel, prompting Armstrong to respond to Mission Control’s questions only after four seconds have elapsed, in order to create the false impression of an increased radio delay, so as to appear to be much farther from the Earth than he and his crew actually were. To best understand this important evidence, a second viewing may be advised, as I too had to look at the newly discovered footage again to realize its incredible significance.
Jump ahead to time 32:03 – 40:50 in “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon” by clicking HERE (or below) if you do not wish to repeat the viewing of the entire forty-seven minute documentary and only see again these newly discovered unedited outtakes of Neil Armstrong falsifying mission photography during the historic and now infamously falsified flight, as well as hear the CIA themselves secretly prompting the crew, instructing them to wait four seconds before answering NASA, in order to give the false impression of the great distance of claiming to be half way to the moon at that time, which would cause an increased radio delay in their response.
Do to the obvious genuineness of the footage I uncovered (as it precisely matches NASA’s other broadcasts in which they claim the very same footage to be “authentic”), NASA had to acknowledge that this newly discovered unedited behind-the-scenes video from the first “moon mission” (which debuted in “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon”) is indeed authentic, they simply said that I was “misinterpreting” it. Misguided diehard fans of NASA and detractors of my documentary on the internet elaborated a bit more, to their very own demise. They plainly acknowledged the simple fact that the crew was indeed falsifying the photography of being “halfway to the moon” in these newly discovered outtakes of mission photography (as nearly everyone has the mind to see and admit after examining it), claiming instead though that the crew was doing so to merely “rehearse” an upcoming scene for the television viewers.
The fact is, this “moon mission” cost about Thirteen Million Dollars Per Minute in today’s value. As such, the last thing the crew would do, would be wasting their precious time, and limited weight, carrying and creating a model of the Earth in space at an alleged distance of halfway to the moon, when the real Earth from a distance halfway to the moon was supposed to be right outside their window! If the crew was “rehearsing”, then they would have just “rehearsed” with the real Earth out the window rather than wasting valuable time creating an unnecessary model of what supposedly really existed a few feet away! Furthermore, the edited and approved segments of this exact footage, those without the errors I uncovered which give the illusion away, appear in numerous NASA documentaries where their narrator refers to the very same material as “genuinely” being half way to the moon! Additionally, with their already being talk at the time by 10% of Americans that the mission was disingenuous government propaganda, the last thing NASA would ever do, if the mission was real, would be to risk falsifying any of it, for the fear that they would be accused of such dishonesty, if indeed the mission was real.
What critics have inadvertently done, is acknowledged that the first “moon crew” falsified part of their photography!
(Now you see why broadcasters will not present my film with this clip in it.)
The fact is, if they really went to the moon, there would be no need to falsify any of the photography!
Just as if only one ingredient at a salad bar is contaminated with poison it fails the entire health inspection, having discovered only one reel of false footage is enough to disqualify the “reality” of all the missions!
All that critics were left with to say in their desperate attempt to extinguish the blazing fire of the Truth contained in this remarkable newly uncovered, unedited behind-the-scenes footage of outtakes of blatant false photography from the first “moon mission”, was a feeble effort to diminish its significance by falsely claiming that it was “no big discovery because the video is readily available to the public”. These people are obviously lying through their teeth. It says in big letters, right at the beginning of the newly discovered reel, “Not for Public Distribution”.
When someone has to lie to defend something, this is proof itself that what they are defending is a lie.
Take it from someone who has personally and exhaustively gone through the entire NASA archives, more than any journalist or diehard fan of the “moon missions” has ever done. This is the only un-edited reel available. Absolutely everything else is pre-edited. My detractors know this, and shortly after my film debuted, they borrowed some of the footage to hastily put into their new pro-NASA releases (as it was never shown previously, proving conclusively that is was not “readily available to the public”), in their dying attempt to minimize the important discovery. In their version of my newly discovered footage though, they specifically deleted the most incriminating video segments, as well as the revealing audio of the CIA prompting the astronauts with “Talk” at the beginning of the deplorable fraudulent footage, done so to remind Armstrong to respond to Mission Control’s questions only after four seconds have elapsed, so as to create the false impression of an increased radio delay and thusly appearing to be much farther away from the Earth than he and his crew actually were. Why would they delete this important betraying audio in their films, if this newly discovered hidden track of secret communications revealed nothing of the forgery?
Some despondent critics have even suggested that I am the one doing the deceiving, simply because in my documentary I move from one relevant part of the new footage to another. Come on, really? As my film is only forty-seven minutes in length and the unedited reel is one hour forty-eight minutes long, this is no more “deceptive” than a news sportscaster, with limited time for their program, showing just the highlights of a football game. Some, believe it or not, are so desperate to keep the Truth buried, that they have even suggested that I staged the violent attacks which I received from the various angry astronauts in “Astronauts Gone Wild” ! (LOL . . . At least they are being creative!)
I am constantly assailed with the age-old juvenile, ineffective, and disreputable technique of assaulting the messenger of bad news, rather than the message itself, by those who feel they have no other course of action because the reality of my position speaks for itself and cannot be truthfully refuted otherwise. The fact that critics resort to attacking the messenger of bad news is proof itself that the message is Truthful, otherwise they would have no need to do so in the defense of their position, if their position was not so dramatically faltering to begin with and in such dire need of misdirection from the condemning evidence.
In coping with the pressures of such professional and personal ostracization, I once gave prescription antidepressants a try. In doing so while engaged in a prolong fast (sixty days without food), I had an allergic reaction, which resulted in an emotional outburst over a disputed parking place, where I walked across the hood of my adversary’s car, denting it in the process. While the “investigative journalist” to whom I personally gave copies of the fraudulent moon landing footage years earlier completely ignored reporting on this felony of the United States Government, they found it noteworthy to report on a misdemeanor of such a whistleblower, adding false aggrandizations in the process.
This reminds me of the 2016 leaks of the Democratic Party leadership obtained from hacked computers. Instead of the FBI pursuing the criminals who brazenly rigged a presidential primary, one in which the candidate with the most votes (Bernie Sanders) repeatedly received the least delegates (a revelation of such corruption that the people involved resigned in humiliation from their lofty positions at the disclosure of this unethical behavior), the federal “policing agency” chose instead to start a prosecutorial investigation into those who merely released the condemning Truthful information of the illegal acts (the messenger), rather than pursue those who actually committed the unlawfulness in the first place! What a sad, sad joke of our country’s government. How on earth my personal error on a random street became so quickly known and disseminated to the press, I have no idea. Someone, somewhere is keeping up with my every move. Why would this be necessary if they really went to the moon?
We have to remember that General Motors president, James Roche, admitted during a United States Senate Investigative Hearing, that he had hired private detectives to follow consumer advocate Ralf Nader in an effort to “harass and discredit him“, simply for pointing out errors in the automaker’s safety. As one who is spearheading a much more horrendous revelation of the much more powerful Federal Government, you can imagine why any misstep I take in private, may mysteriously make its way to a government affiliated public “media” forum in an effort to discredit the messenger.
My tenure of two years as news editor at an NBC affiliate has been falsely identified by my leading critic as two “months”, in an unscrupulous effort to discredit my professional experience. I worked there through two consecutive “Christmas” holidays and then some, so I and a dozen eyewitnesses know better than he how long I worked there. If my leading critic has to lie to make his point, then his point is not valid to begin with, as valid points don’t need lies to support them. If he was simply “mistaken”, then his inept powers of research prove that if he cannot uncover the Truth about one simple fact on earth in his own country, then how could he possibly discern the numerous intricacies of CIA intrigue as to what may or may not be taking place on the moon? The great thing is, either way, his own false statements regarding such a simple thing, prove himself wrong on the more complicated issue.
The fact that I, during a past occasion used to drive a taxi on weekends to help pay the bills during an economic downturn, is used by some desperate critics to negate the fact that I have been a professional filmmaker for more than thirty years, winning “Best Cinematography”, “Best Editing” and “Top Ten Director” from the American Motion Picture Society, and as such, can highly discern fraudulent photography when I see it. (See a list of my films, whose budgets ranged from $2000 to $500,000, by clicking HERE.) If you really think about it, what these lovers of denial are saying is that if you have ever driven a yellow car on weekends, this disqualifies you from being able to perceive the Truth. Anyone who makes such a nonsensical argument to begin with, is likewise proving, by their own ridiculous argumentation or deliberately false or unresearched statements, that it is they who lack the ability to perceive reality.
Completely fabricated, and highly outrageous accusations have been made against me, for simply telling the Truth. I even regularly receive vulgar curse filled death threats . . . all for simply saying that I think the Federal Government lied to the public on at least one occasion. The fact that some people react like vicious and insane rabid dogs from a mere statement of opinion, is further proof that the statement is True, as a sword with no point causes no injury.
“The further a society drifts from the Truth,
the more it will hate those who speak it.”
Here is an example of a typical email which I receive, and occasionally respond to, after someone watches me being punched by Edwin “Buzz” Aldrin in a news clip, yet fails to look at any other evidence:
On Monday, July 17, 2017 8:37 PM,
Mark Nicholson <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
FUCK YOU ASSHOLE.
Greetings! I hope you are well!
Why on earth would you go out of your way to send a fifty-two year old man, whom you have never met and whom has never done you any harm, such a nasty email filled with cursing and name calling, just because he has a different point of view than you?
Such behavior only demonstrates that your mind is warped.
In such a condition, how could you possibly perceive the Truth in something so intricate as to whether or not the disreputable Federal Government, who only recently admitted to starting the Vietnam War (which led to the deaths of over a million people) with a falsified attack on US soldiers, by US soldiers, blamed on the North Vietnamese, whether or not the same disreputable Federal Government also deceived the public about the moon landings around the same time?
Thank you though, for proving me right, as your violent and vulgar behavior towards someone, who merely holds a different point of view than you, clearly demonstrates that your estranged mind is not thinking clearly enough to perceive the Truth, even if it is a foot away from you.
It is interesting that some people see the exact opposite of you, that it is the astronauts who are the deplorable cowards, and they regard me as a hero for courageously standing up to them, against the vast misled public opinion such as yours, standing alone to publicly expose their hidden corruption. Except they don’t send hate emails to the other side, calling others names like a spoiled third grader does, like you do, and vehemently cursing at those who simply hold a different point of view than you, the very emotionally imbalanced actions of which prove the fallacy of your argument to begin with.
Ever wonder why they claimed to have walked on the moon, on the very first attempt (even though, right here on earth, Mt. Everest and the South Pole took numerous tries before success), allegedly accomplishing this amazing feat with antiquated 1960’s technology (while today a cell phone has one million times the computing power than all of NASA did back then), yet fifty years later, the farthest an astronaut can travel from the Earth to the moon is only 1 / 1000th the distance?
WAKE UP !!!
Your mind is clouded with something if you cannot see the reality of this blatant contradiction of simple logic of the normal technological advancement of things, and respond like a rabid dog to those who merely see things differently than you.
The “moon landings” have become a god to you, and a false one at that, whose prophet I have insulted. Your vulgar and violent reaction to theses plain facts, towards another person who merely holds a different opinion than you, proves that you are in this religious trance.
I hope you see a qualified psychiatrist or a pastor very soon.
Be Blessed Anyway,
Here is a positive email:
On Friday, July 21, 2017 5:57 PM,
Mike Miller <email@example.com> wrote:
I loved your article on did NASA really go to the moon years ago. I’ve also watched your films and they are awesome.
I was a typical sheep with the herd mentality until 9-11. When I saw those towers collapse just like any other controlled demolition. I knew immediately that we were being hood-winked. Now, I don’t trust anyone or anything concerning the government, media, academia, the military, science, etc. I just trust people like you and my own research and intuition.
I’d always suspected the moon landings were a hoax. Even as a child, watching the astronauts goofily bounce around just looked suspect and hokey. But after seeing your work and others, I have no doubt.
You are very brave. It takes a lot of courage to expose these devils. I’m just asking you to be careful. They have killed many people for doing a lot less than you. I’m afraid of what might happen to you if you continue to push it.
I wish there were millions more just like you. I’m hoping that this younger generation will rise up – demand answers – and force a restructuring of the government and give us leaders we can trust. Unfortunately, the bankers, the CIA, and Mossad, will not give up easily and many more patriots, researchers, and whistle-blowers will probably die before the revolution.
I wish I could make a difference like you have. I think you are great and I admire you. I’m praying for your safety, and I wish you all the best in the future.
Kindest regards, Mike from Tennessee
Not too long ago, I interviewed the second man to not walk on the moon, Edwin “Buzz” Aldrin. He sat down with me thinking that I was going to interview him in order to help him make money off of a book he was promoting. Instead, I had a television monitor set up to ask him about the newly discovered unedited outtakes of false photography from his “moon mission”, in which he was actually the camera operator orchestrating the deception.
You have to understand, at that moment, with two professional television cameras there, a crew of about five people, as well as professional lights and microphones, Aldrin thought, for a brief moment, that the news story of the moon landing fraud had just broken worldwide. It was at this time that he exclaimed in anger (at time 8:58 – 9:11 in the sequel to my film entitled “Astronauts Gone Wild”, showcased in the link below), “And this makes you a real famous person that has discovered this and reveals all this stuff! What an ego you must have to want to propel yourself (your career) like this!” The question is, if I was wrong with my discovery, how could I become famous from exposing nothing? Therefore, this statement itself is an admission of guilt, as he didn’t say I was wrong with my revelation, rather he said that I had impure motives for revealing this Truth to the world. (You can see these remarks of his in “Astronauts Gone Wild” by clicking HERE.)
Aldrin even shouted back (at time 8:30 – 8:38), “Well you’re talking to the wrong guy! Why don’t you talk to the administrator of NASA! We’re (only) passengers! We’re guys going on a flight!” (See this remark of his by clicking HERE in “Astronauts Gone Wild“.)
As Aldrin was “only a passenger“, as he plainly stated, then that certainly means that he never piloted the lunar module to the moon’s surface, as he previous claimed, because a passenger and a pilot are certainly very different from one another. (Merely orbiting the earth for eight days, entirely under the control of NASA, is what made him a passenger, not a pilot, as he firmly admitted.)
Aldrin finally remembered that I was not with “ABC” (news) as he previously believed, rather “ABC-Digital”, the name of my independent television production company at the time. At this point, when he realized that the discovery of the fraud was isolated, by an independent television producer, not yet broadcast worldwide by a major television network, he started backpedaling on his admission of guilt and started to reassert, though not very convincingly, his mission’s alleged authenticity. When Aldrin finally realized that he had made critical errors in judgment by acknowledging twice, with the above two statements, that I was right in regard to my discovery of the Truth, he threatened to sue me if I showed his on-camera admissions of guilt to anyone. Certainly if these two statements were not admissions of guilt, he would have no problem releasing them to the public. (See Aldrin’s threat of a lawsuit at time 10:11 – 10:18 in “Astronauts Gone Wild” by clicking HERE.)
Seeing how my job as a filmmaker of more than thirty years is to make fake scenes look real, this specific expertise of mine is how I first discerned that the “moon missions” were filmed inside of a television studio with electrical light, rather than with sunlight on a natural exterior landscape as was falsely claimed. In fact, more than two decades ago, in showing a colleague of mine (with many more years of professional filmmaking experience than I had at the time) a recent dramatic film I had just completed, he complimented me by saying, “I really liked the way you captured the sunset at the end of your movie.” I smiled and said, “That was actually an electrical light, not the sun.”
In the case of the “moon” scenes that were allegedly lit solely with the bright sunlight on the atmosphereless moon, the shadows from one object (or person) compared to another, should always, without exception, run parallel with one another and never intersect. Yet, in several of the photographs allegedly taken on the moon, shadows from one object or person run at a different angel than the other and eventually intersect. This would absolutely never happen in sunlight, as the sun, the alleged only light source in the “moon” pictures, is one million times bigger in volume than the Earth, and therefore evenly lights in the exact same direction of any given area over the entire Earth.
See the direction of the SHADOWS below.
According to NASA, no electrical lighting whatsoever was used on any of the “moon missions”, simply because of allegedly being on a heavenly body in very bright sunlight, which doesn’t have clouds or atmosphere, made supplemental lighting completely unnecessary and a waste of precious electrical power and weight. In fact, according to NASA, because the moon has no atmosphere of any kind, the sunlight there is twenty times brighter than on the Earth, so the last thing any photographer on the moon would need is an electrical light that would cast intersecting shadows, unless of course they were really in an enclosed film studio.
In a “National Geographic” television special on how the moon landing hoax was supposed to not be a hoax at all, in a vain attempt to bury the emerging Truth, they went to a California desert at night to “simulate” the alleged conditions on the moon. They dressed up an actor in an “astronaut” costume, had them stand a few feet apart from a fellow television crewmember, brought in one electrical light to simulate the sun, and basically said, “See! The shadows of the two people standing near one another do intersect in our ‘moon simulation’, so filmmaker Bart Sibrel is wrong.”
The point is, their shadows in their little demonstration intersected because their “moon simulation” was lit with electrical light! . . . All the while they claimed that this proved that the moon missions were real, when their very demonstration proved that the moon missions were fake instead! Think about it! In their “moon simulation”, with electrical light, the shadows did intersect, just like in some of the NASA “moon” pictures. Yet, they said, “These results directly contradict the conspiracy claims” (which are that the pictures from NASA on the “moon” were lit with electrical light, not sunlight). They told this blatant lie in a deceptive attempt to confuse the viewer from seeing the Truth, when in fact, these very results of theirs proved the conspiracy claims to be True rather than false!
Do you see this?!
They went to the desert at night, allegedly, to get a black background like on the moon, yet this was not the point of the experiment. The point of the experiment was to see which of the two casts parallel shadows: sunlight (as claimed by NASA) or electrical light (as claimed by me), because the assertion I made in my film was that the reason the shadows intersect in some of the NASA pictures is because they were lit with electrical light in a film studio instead of sunlight outside on the moon as they falsely claimed, where the shadows would never intersect!
Did you get this?
The “National Geographic” Channel (a propaganda arm of the United States government) simulated the “moon” pictures (matched them) by using electrical light, not sunlight, which means that the Apollo pictures were taken with electrical light, not sunlight, meaning they were taken on earth! . . . All the while they tried to mislead the audience into believing the exact opposite of the Truth, that this deceptive “evidence” of theirs proved the moon mission’s authenticity, when in fact this exact evidence proves the exact opposite, that the NASA pictures were also taken with electrical light, and this is precisely why the shadows intersected in their reenactment, as well as the NASA pictures, because they were both taken on Earth with electrical light, which caused the intersecting shadows!
The National Geographic program further lied in their “special” when they said “only a very small group of people believe that the moon missions were fraudulent”. Really? Is 60 million of 300 million Americans a “very small group”? (Not to mention approximately 4 billion others, in other non-brainwashed countries, that perceive the Truth!) If the group of believers of the Truth is so “very small”, as they falsely claimed, then what is the esteemed “National Geographic” Channel doing wasting an entire expensive hour of television, and tens of thousands of dollars in production costs, trying to convince such a “small minority” out of their “crazy” and “insignificant” error? Obviously these extensive resources are being spent because of the growing millions of Americans who are awakening to their senses, that networks like these are trying to keep the multitudes perpetually deceived and asleep to overlook their ongoing crimes.
Their own “expert” on the program, as to the “moon landing’s” alleged authenticity, the one of such astuteness that he proved my film right when he was trying to prove it wrong, admitted that his life’s work is to convince people that the “moon landings” were real. Why would this be anyone’s life’s work if the “moon missions” were so “unquestionably real”, the numbers opposed to him were so “very small”, and the people opposed to his belief were merely “crazy” as the program insinuated? Would you spend your entire life’s energy trying to convince crazy people who thought that the country’s first president was Mickey Mouse that it was really George Washington? Of course not. The amount of time, energy, and expensive resources spent on this and a hundred other films and websites to convince accused defective simpletons of the alleged “obviousness” of the claimed moon landings, itself speaks of deliberate propagandizing of a lie.
Even the scene at time 30:38 – 31:06 in “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon” (Click HERE to view), in which the astronauts appear to be “floating” around in 1/6th gravity, is so obviously a simple, yet very convincing, “slow motion” effect, that when they showed the same clip from my film in their deceptive “National Geographic” television special, which was specifically created to disprove my damaging film, they deliberately “zoomed in” on this footage, far beyond the soles of the astronaut’s feet and the dirt on which they walked, intentionally so that the viewers could not see the astronauts only getting the same half inch above the ground as they also do here on earth, which my film specifically exemplified as condemning evidence. When you simply double the speed of the footage with professional video equipment, it becomes blatantly obvious that the seemingly convincing “1/6th gravity floating effect” is nothing more than a rudimentary, yet effective, “slow motion” effect. Truly, this alone proves that they were not on the moon, where they should have been able to leap several feet off of the ground, which they accomplished in later “missions” with hidden cables to overcome this initial error on their part. This program’s deliberate concealment and misrepresentation of the facts itself proves that my claims are true, otherwise they would have no need to do this.
“Myth Busters” did the very same thing as the “National Geographic” special, by lighting their simulated “moonscape” with electrical light rather than sunlight, in an inverted attempt to simulate the lighting conditions on the moon, when in reality what they really did is prove that NASA’s “moon” picture were taken with electrical light rather that sunlight, meaning they were taken in a film studio, as no electrical lights were brought to the moon. Why they, like the others, did not use sunlight to simulate sunlight is beyond me, unless their real intention was to deceptively mislead the television viewers into wrongly believing this “reenactment” of theirs with electrical light proved the mission’s authenticity, when in fact this very methodology actually proves the exact opposite, as they too duplicated the intersecting shadows of the “moon” pictures with electrical light rather than sunlight, proving again that NASA’s “moon” pictures were lit with electrical light rather than sunlight, therefore in a film studio, likewise all the while they too lied to their television audience by saying that their deceptive technique proved the exact opposite of the Truth . . . Amazing.
As before, if this misrepresentation was intentional, then deliberately lying to make a contested point proves that their position is false to begin with. If such an inversion of the Truth was accidental, then it proves their complete incompetence on the subject. Either way, it proves that the “moon landings” were lit with electrical light and thereby indeed false, completely contrary to their grossly misleading presentation.
It was when I pointed out these deceptions or errors of theirs that the producers of these two shows (who I believe were NASA surrogates) recanted to have me on their programs, or deleted my previously recorded interviews from their content, because not only did I prove that the “moon landings” were fraudulent beyond any doubt, I also exposed their blatantly deceptive and backwards methodology to make their misleading points to a beguiled public, something they were not about to broadcast.
If a television program about the moon landing “conspiracy theory” refuses to have on their show the world’s leading advocate on this very subject, or deliberately deletes conclusive evidence from him of the fraud from their content, then how can they at all be trusted to be presenting the Truth in the first place? If the “moon landings” are so obviously real and incontestable as they falsely claimed, then they would let me speak uncensored about their fraudulent methodology, and show the newly discovered, and highly condemning, unedited video evidence without any fear whatsoever, which neither of them risked doing. Thusly, the final lie of theirs was that their program on this subject was a real open debate of the issue, rather than a production whose sole purpose was to reassure the doubting public that this age old deception which is steadfastly coming to light is still trustworthy despite overwhelming mounting evidence.
Do you see how upside-down the Truth is presented on television? The real “myth” is that the “moon landings” took place with 1960’s technology, on the very first attempt, allegedly going 1000 times farther than the space station is or any man can travel today, with five decades older technology. This is the myth they should be busting. Instead, they are a propaganda arm of the corrupt United States government and the CIA, whose native language is lies, saying that the Truth is a myth, and that a myth is the Truth . . . all the while the corrupt government charges their citizens, billions of dollars in taxes, for the honor of being lied to by their deceptive “leaders” . . . Utterly disgusting.
Do you have eyes that Truly perceive . . .
or only eyes which see,
what the magician wants you to see?
NBC, my old alma mater, for a program on their affiliate the “Discovery Channel”, paid me thousands of dollars, flew me to New York City, put me up in the very expensive Waldorf Astoria hotel, all because a new, independent-minded producer of theirs wanted to air my side of the story, as well as exclusively showcase the first network broadcast of my newly discovered unedited video evidence of the behind-the-scenes photographic fraud from the first “moon mission”. (Remember, another NBC news director previously viewed the very same evidence and promptly concluded that it conclusively proved the moon landing fraud, though disappointedly said, “I cannot air this. It will cause a civil war”.) This new NBC producer told me, after editing my interview and transferring the condemning footage in preparation for a special broadcast, that NASA somehow found out about her program and threatened NBC, and all of their affiliates, with permanently disconnecting their live camera aboard the International Space Station and never cooperating with them ever again as retaliation if they broadcasted this revealing television program of theirs. Seeing how NBC and the Discovery Channel regularly used and boasted about video feeds from this camera of theirs onboard the International Space Station on numerous ongoing television programs on on numerous channels of theirs, NBC succumbed to the NASA blackmail, cancelled their television special showcasing this amazing discovery from the “Discovery Channel”, and never aired the interview they filmed of me painstakingly explaining the newly discovered condemning NASA footage, which they had already excitedly purchased the exclusive rights to, even though it cost them tens of thousands of dollars of loss in the process.
Do you still believe there is a free press outside of government control?
How the federal government found out about this special broadcast which the producer tried to keep confidential from them is a mystery to me, unless my work is being monitored. The question is, why would my “silly” work about the moon landing fraud be monitored by the government if they really went to the moon?
In an effort to find out, I went the NASA launch headquarters in Florida to see what would happen. When I encountered a retired “Apollo” astronaut and asked him to confirm that he actually left Earth orbit (because I had newly discovered evidence to the contrary), I was promptly, and forcibly, removed from the public property, which was opened to the public, by security forces, with the threat of arrest if I persisted with my questions. If you had been there and witnessed this firsthand as I did, you would have sworn that I was in oppressive North Korea or China, rather than the “free” United States of America, with an alleged “free” press.
The only television program to ever broadcast my newly discovered condemning footage of unedited outtakes of false photography from the first “moon mission”, with its most revealing secret audio channel of the CIA prompting the astronauts during their deception, was “Tech TV’s” enormously popular national cable talk show called “Unscrewed”, who mistakenly broadcast the revealing footage without prior executive approval. In fact, the show was so successful, that their viewership doubled every thirty days for the first two years it was on the air! Despite being the highest rated program on the entire network by far, bringing in the owners of the channel untold millions of dollars, the show was abruptly canceled immediately after airing this inflammatory footage of NASA’s forgery, especially when someone powerful higher up witnessed the studio audience reacting with horror and indignation when they saw it. This cancellation was a not so subtle warning to other broadcasters who might make the same error in judgment. Since then, knowing this penalty of termination hanging over their heads, no other network has dared to air, on any of their programs, any condemning portions of this monumental evidence, which emphatically proves, to both an NBC news director and producer, as well as many other professionals, that the “moon missions” never left Earth orbit, as is their limit today, with fifty years better rockets and computers.
The simple Truth is, if I really walked on the moon, and someone thought otherwise, I would find that hysterically funny! If someone asked me to swear on the Bible to that “fact”, why in the world would I object to taking an oath of such an “obvious” event? Instead, the astronauts in question reacted to the request as if I walked up to them in the company of their wife and asked them how their secret mistress was doing! If they really walked on the moon, me saying otherwise would be like throwing a feather at them. Why would anyone be violently mad at someone for throwing a feather at them? If, on the other hand, I were exposing a real crime of infidelity that they had gotten away with for decades and built lifelong financial reputations on, then you could certainly see why they would react with such violent hatred. (If you haven’t already, or wish to view again, you can see these revealing reactions at time 00:00 – 2:00 in “Astronauts Gone Wild” by clicking HERE.)
I even met privately with “investigative journalist” Geraldo Rivera in New York City to personally give him a copy of “A Funny Thing happened on the Way to the Moon”, which includes the newly discovered condemning video evidence. While I later appeared as a guest on his show to discuss this topic, he made it clear to me that though he may be personally suspicious of the “moon missions” authenticity, he is not able to say so publicly and keep his job. The only way that I could appear and present my case on his program was if I did not show the number one key piece of evidence of the fraud. Why would this matter . . . if they really went to the moon? Instead of showcasing the recently uncovered absolute proof of the fraud, Fox television chose to sensationalize the violence I received in pursuit of the Truth. Subsequently, one has to question Geraldo’s (and other’s) credentials as a real “investigative journalists”, rather than pop-culture propagandists, especially when they privately confide in me that they know the hidden Truth and refuse to share it with the public, whom they claim to look out for, out of fear of personal reprisal.
The same is true of the “New York Times”. While “investigate reporter” John Schwartz interviewed me in-depth on the topic of the moon landing fraud, the story which he actually wrote was about “how interesting it is that some people doubt the moon landings”, rather than an actual investigation into the real possibility that indeed the missions were a Cold War deception. When I asked him about the newly discovered condemning video evidence of the astronauts staging their photography of being “halfway to the moon” when they were still in earth orbit, he replied, “I can’t explain that”, and then he went on to say that such an investigation of his along these lines would result in his termination by his superiors.
“USA Today”, along with many other newspapers, television and radio stations, “reviewed” my documentary “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon”, yet repeatedly toted the status quo. In each and every case, with the exception of John Schwartz who was admittedly dumbfounded by the newly discovered condemning video evidence, when I tracked down the actual person who wrote the critical review of my film and asked them, “What did you think about the newly discovered unedited footage of false photography from Apollo 11 showcased in my movie?”, they all replied, “Well . . . I didn’t actually watch the movie. I wrote the review on the concept of the film, not the actual content.”
The fact is, four out of five people who actually watch the forty-seven minute documentary, with the condemning new evidence debuted in it, reverse their opinion as to the “moon missions” authenticity.
90% of allegedly professional “journalists”, for major magazines, newspapers, and television stations, actually wrote reviews about a film which they didn’t even watch! . . . Can you believe this?! Why aren’t people like this fired for incompetence or dereliction of duty, instead of being promoted to positions of national media authority?!
Four networks, so far, have paid thousands of dollars for the exclusive license to broadcast this newly discovered amazing NASA footage, only to be told at the eleventh hour not to do it by senior network executives (who are likely bedfellows of the CIA, by bribe or by blackmail, whose criminality would be exposed by airing it). The BBC did this very thing only three days before my film’s scheduled broadcast, after they had licensed the condemning footage nearly a year in advance at the cost of thousands of dollars. I was privately informed that a senior US government official personally telephoned the president of the BBC and put pressure on them to not air the program with its condemning new evidence. The BBC even bribed the executive producer of my film with additional thousands of dollars to sign a contract not to publicize their reason for recanting. Again, why would all this be going on, if they really went to the moon fifty years ago on the first attempt?
In fact, this executive producer of which I speak, who wishes to remain anonymous, who put up approximately one million dollars to help produce these films of mine exposing the moon landing fraud, has an IQ nearing 200 and is a board member of an aerospace company which is presently building rockets for NASA! Wouldn’t such a person know whether the “moon landing” of 1969 was possible or not with 1960’s technology? Of course they would. They do know. They know that the missions were staged. They know, from an engineering standpoint, that 1960’s NASA “low bid” equipment, which killed three astronauts on the ground two years earlier without even igniting an engine, could never have successfully landed on the moon on their first attempt with 1960’s technology, especially considering the fact that the feat cannot be repeated today with fifty years more advanced computers and rockets, with astronauts now only being able to travel 1/1000th as far from the Earth as was claimed a half a century ago!
Although the technology allegedly used to “put a man on the moon” was not classified, because the missions were “supposed” to have been done by a non-military “civilian” government agency (NASA), all of the specific blueprints of the hypothetically miraculous machinery, according to NASA, are nevertheless “unavailable”. This is because all of the flight telemetry data, as well as all of the technical specifications of the “Apollo” spacecraft, were deliberately destroyed by NASA after the “moon missions”. You would think that such important, one of a kind, and supremely valuable and expensive designs, at a cost of One Hundred Fifty Billion Dollars in today’s value, would be kept for just short of all of eternity, in case such costly to attain information and equipment would be needed again in the future . . . Yet the exact opposite is the case. (Click HERE or on the below window to see this amazing confession.)
How did the lunar lander power air-conditioning against an outside temperature of 252 degrees Fahrenheit (122 C) down to an amazing 72 degrees Fahrenheit (22 C) inside a boiling spacecraft for three days nonstop with a bank of, essentially, car batteries? No one will ever know. All of the schematics and electrical diagrams of the lunar lander were deliberately destroyed! How did the “moon” rocket go 1000 times farther than the space shuttle with decades less advanced technology? No one will ever know. The rocket diagrams and blueprints were removed from the national archives and are nowhere to be found!
Imagine Bill Gates spending One Hundred Fifty Billion Dollars to build the first computer, and then once successfully completing it, throwing the computer with its blueprints into a furnace . . . Would anyone ever – ever – ever do such a crazy thing?! . . . Of course not . . . yet . . . this is what NASA did with the “technology” which they claimed could reach the moon in the 1960’s.
This is proof itself that the “moon missions” were fraudulent . . . Here’s why . . .
If you really went to the moon and spent One Hundred Fifty Billion Dollars to do so, you would never – ever – ever deliberately throw away such precious hard earned technology . . . Never! Has anyone ever deliberately thrown away breakthrough technology in the entire history of the world? . . . Of course not. Even the atomic bomb, though this technology should have been thrown away, was cherished with relish, protected with all security, and then multiplied and improved upon one hundredfold within just ten years. Thusly, if the moon landings were real fifty years ago, then men would have walked on Mars decades ago.
On the other hand, if NASA faked going to the moon, and a detailed analysis of the engineering specifications could prove mathematically that the rocket did not have enough fuel to reach its destination and return, or that the onboard computers were not fast enough to process the complicated trajectories in real time as the mission required, or that the power in the lunar module batteries was not sufficient to supply the air conditioning to combat exterior temperatures of 252 degrees Fahrenheit (122 Celsius) for three days without cooking alive the crew inside, then yes indeed NASA would definitely destroy any and all proof of their deception, which is exactly what they did.
Again, if NASA really went to the moon, they would never – ever – ever destroy that important technology. If, on the other hand, NASA faked going to the moon, then they would most definitely destroy the evidence which would prove it a technological impossibility. Thusly, the fact that NASA did destroy the evidence is concrete proof itself that they did not go to the moon. End of story.
All of this intentional file burning was done so that if a curious and astute propulsion or electrical engineering student in the future were to do the actual mathematical calculations, they would not be able to expose the fact that the “lunar lander”, in reality, did not have the electrical battery capacity necessary to power the air-conditioning down 180 degrees Fahrenheit (82 C) from the outside temperature nonstop for three days, nor did the onboard rudimentary computers have the processing power or speed to calculate the complicated trajectories in real time to avoid a fatal catastrophe, nor did the main “Apollo” rocket have the fuel necessary to leave Earth orbit to begin with, as the newly uncovered video evidence clearly proves by the crew’s falsification of being halfway to the moon.
Don’t believe me? Watch the video clip below in which I read the super intelligent “Apollo” rocket designer’s original mathematical calculations to “moon” astronaut Eugene Cernan as to the only way possible to reach the moon, a methodology which NASA never used. (You can see Cernan squirm and sweat as he realizes that he has just been caught in a lie.) Wernher von Braun, the astute mathematician and rocket scientist, said this regarding the only way to reach the moon:
“It is commonly believed that men will fly directly from the Earth to the moon, but to do this we would require a vehicle of such gigantic proportions that it would prove an economic impossibility. Calculations have been carefully worked out on the type of vehicle we would need for the nonstop flight from the Earth to the moon and to return. The figures speak for themselves: Three rockets would be necessary, each rocket ship would be taller than the Empire State Building (1250 feet) and weigh about ten times the tonnage of the Queen Mary (800,000 tons).”
The “moon” rocket the United States Government could afford weighed just 2500 tons (a difference of 32,000 percent) and was just 363 feet tall . . . and there was just one of them, rather than the three stated as required. Furthermore, Braun went on to say that a Space Station must first be constructed before a manned mission to the moon, from which to ferry the three rockets and the necessary fuel to the moon and back. (The International Space Station was not completed until 2011.) Braun further insisted that after once landing on the moon, crews would have to find or dig a cave in which to shelter themselves from thousands of micrometeorites per hour hitting the moon’s surface traveling at speeds in excess of 20,000 miles per hour, which would inevitably puncture the spacecraft, as well as the astronaut’s spacesuit, causing catastrophic, and fatal, environmental decompression. This, of course, like the other requirements, was never done.
When the government told the man in charge of the “moon” rocket to adjust his numbers “a little bit” to reflect a fictitious way to reach the moon with the available resources and technology of the time, he immediately, and obediently, dramatically recanted his published and respected findings. Did I mention that this man in charge of the “moon” program’s authenticity, Wernher von Braun, was a former World War Two Nazi whom our own government’s State Department is on the record for saying that, had he not prematurely died shortly after the “moon missions”, he would have been immediately thereafter indicted for War Crimes for overseeing the genocide, and the cover-up thereof, of hundreds of innocent people during the war? This threat of blackmail, and likely bribery as well, was likely used to gain his obedient submission to the government deception and his “adjustment” of irrefutable mathematical calculations. (“The figures speak for themselves.”)
Not only are all of the specifications, blueprints, and telemetry data of the miraculous NASA 1960’s technology that allegedly went to the moon on the very first attempt nowhere to be found because it was all intentionally destroyed, all of the original television transmission videotapes, estimated to weigh about two tons, have also been mysteriously “lost” inside the Federally Secured National Archives. Why? Because naïve director Ron Howard, whose own wise grandfather warned him that the “moon missions” were staged, ignoring that advice, requested that all of the original videotapes be transferred to High Definition for an I-Max documentary he was producing to gleefully commemorate the “moon missions”, as he believed, at that time, that they were real. Prior to Howard’s request, the highest quality version of the television footage that anyone had ever seen was deliberately a fourth generation copy (a copy, of a copy, of a copy), in order to diminish and disguise the falsification detail and resolution of the fake “moon” landscapes, so that any imperfections that might give away the illusion would be minimized.
When this moon-landing-believing prominent film director asked for the original NASA videotapes of all of the “moon walks” so that he could transfer them to High Definition video, in order to be projected for the first time in history onto a screen that was nearly 120 feet by 100 feet, for all the world to see at a resolution that was at least four times greater in detail than had ever before been witnessed, within days of his request, all of the original “moon landing” videotapes vanished from the Federal Archives! But of course, we still went to the moon, right?
Proof of this bewildering predicament, is that when Howard’s documentary commemorating the “moon missions” was finally produced without this essential material, he resorted to filling about 95 percent of his landmark film with “reenactments” of the supposed moon walks, which he likewise filmed in a television studio. In fact, there was so little actual original footage available of the alleged greatest event of mankind, that this multimillion dollar director had to resort to renting VHS tapes of other filmmaker’s previous work on the subject at Blockbuster Video in order to have at least some of the vanishing NASA footage! He was so ashamed of the low quality of the VHS images that he was forced to use, because of the scarcity of them, that he reduced their size within the nearly 120 foot by 100 foot screen to only about 10 percent of the available space to minimize the now fifth generation copy quality.
In case you were wondering “what if”, someday, the mysteriously vanished original videotapes were to one day be found? . . . Oops! . . . Did I forget to tell you? . . . The only machine on the entire planet that could ever play these one of a kind format videotapes was deliberately disassembled and destroyed by NASA, right after the original tapes got “misplaced”, making that scenario absolutely impossible. Funny, isn’t it? The National Archives has the original “Declaration of Independence”, more than two hundred forty years old, yet “misplaced” every original document about the “greatest achievement of all mankind” (amounting to several tons in weight), which is only fifty years old!
As various nations and private enterprises finally, after nearly fifty years, have the capability to send microwave oven sized probes to the moon (still no men), NASA has quickly drafted regulations to keep their alleged manned landing sites of the Nixon administration completely off-limits. They have said that any flyovers of these locations, or ground incursions thereof, by probes of any nations, including their own, to prove or disprove the “moon missions” authenticity, are strictly forbidden. (Since when does the US government own the moon?) You would think that they would gladly welcome independent proof (of which there has never been) that their outrageous scientific claims of 1960’s technology were real (even though the feat cannot be repeated today, half a century later), especially in the face of growing universal doubt to the contrary, yet again the exact opposite proves to be the case. It is like a murderer who boasts about their innocence, all the while refusing to give a personal DNA sample, which they know full well might incriminate them.
China, a trillion dollar trading partner of the United States, recently sent an un-manned probe to the moon. As all of the moon is uniformly desolate and one landing site is just about as good as any other for exploration, I would think that the perfect and most logical place to land would be that of the United States’ alleged first “moon mission”, to prove to the world that their probe was really on the moon. Yet if the American government’s “moon landing” artifacts are not there themselves, this might be biting the trillion dollar trading-partner hand that feeds them. Subsequently, China steered clear of any supposed NASA “moon landing” sites for any of their unmanned lunar probes, even though these were the most logical places to land.
Astrobotic Technology, a private firm, had also planned to land an unmanned probe precisely at the claimed “Apollo 11” landing site, as they too saw this as the most logical choice to prove that their probe was really on the moon, yet because of pressure from NASA not to do so, and subsequently embarrass the organization and government for not having really landed on the moon in 1969, the president of the company, John Thornton, caved in and agreed not to land there as originally planned, even though the moon is not owned by anyone and he was “free” to do so. Is it scientific “freedom” when important exploration is completely abandoned because of pressure to maintain a falsehood of the CIA?
If putting a man on the moon is supposed to be “the greatest achievement of mankind”, then certainly not doing it as internationally claimed, lying about it to the entire world, embezzling One Hundred Fifty Billion Dollars in the process, deceiving and misleading college students, high school students, scientists, academics, congress, the senate, and future space pioneers who will endanger their lives thinking it was so easy to go to the moon in the 1960’s on the very first attempt, then this event, the falsification of the moon landings, out of pride, greed, and arrogance, is really one of the most profound events in human history. This is why the falsification of the moon landings is more profound historically, than if they had actually gone.
Do you see this?
This Great Truth, as to the True nature of humanity and their governments, the deceptive, arrogant, and criminal nature thereof, is being withheld from the majority, by the few people at the top, because they are the ones who committed this crime in the first place and think that they are better than the rest of us.
This Great Truth, which would humble mankind and their governments into changing their character for the better, before it is too late, is being withheld from the public, like a cure for cancer, the very disclosure of which would bring about its recovery, and without this disclosure, our intellectual and moral growth will be forever stunted.
I am sometimes criticized by my fellow citizens as “unpatriotic” for saying that the “glorious” American “moon landings” were a Cold War CIA deception, even though this is the Truth. Our country has hopelessly descended into a realm where liars are heroes, and Truth speakers are villains. If George Washington arose from his grave today and saw all of this unspeakable corruptive government deception, he would grab the first ship back to England. He repeatedly told the painstakingly detailed unflattering Truth of the desperateness of the situation of his Continental Army against the vastly outnumbered and better equipped British troops, to a congress, whom even at that early historic hour, wanted to hear flowery lies of success instead of unpleasant realities. Our leaders have gone from “I can never tell a lie”, to practically lying all of the time. It is not un–patriotic to expose corruption, it is patriotic. It is un-patriotic to have committed this deceitfulness in the first place. If you love Truth and America, then you can see why, “The Truth will set you free.”
Just as a gangster’s children would have a hard time seeing dear old papa as anything but a benevolent patriarch, prideful “intellectuals”, as well as deceived “patriots” will seldom admit, without being forcibly shown, that their idolized “science” and aggrandized “government” can be just as corrupt as pedophile priest.
The fact remains, that if all of the scientists from all of the nations on earth cannot go to the moon today with fifty years more advanced computer and rocket technology, and astronauts now can only travel 1/1000th the distance from earth as was claimed half a century ago, on the very first attempt, with one millionth the computing power in all of NASA than a modern day cell phone, then it simply means, and it cannot mean anything else, that America did not go to the moon in the 1960’s.
Technology does not go backwards . . .
Except in this one case,
and no other instance,
in the entire history of the world.
All of these facts eventually become obvious to anyone with an open mind who does not have a religious attachment to the blasphemous event.
“Tell my people their transgression.”
“God opposes the proud,
yet gives grace to the humble.”
“Apollyon” (the origin of “Apollo”) means
“The Devil” or “Deceiver”
“The painful Truth from a friend,
is better than flattery from an enemy.”
“Have nothing to do with deeds of darkness,
instead, expose them.”
“The Truth will set you free.”
Thank you for your kind and generous support!
Shop on Amazon with This Button
Conspiracy Corner is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide modest commissions to Conspiracy Corner by linking through them to Amazon.com and their affiliated sites. When you shop on Amazon, please come back to this page and click on the logo above, or you can save the link below in your browser’s bookmarks as “Amazon” for convenient future use and support.