Tag Archives: Globalists
Investigative journalist and bestselling author Daniel Estulin is this week’s guest on Real Politik. Based in Spain, Mr. Estulin is renowned for his reportage and research on the transnational power elite, whose agendas and deliberations greatly influence the trajectory of global economic and political events. His book, The True Story of the Bilderberg Group (2005), is an international bestseller that has been translated into over 40 languages. He has recently been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize for this and related journalistic work.
Estulin’s research has led him to conclude that the true rulers are not elected. Rather, they effectively vet and choose those vying for public office who will carry out broader agendas beyond public view. “Many years ago,” he recalls, “when I began researching these people I came across them by chance. I asked myself a fairly simple question, ‘If presidents and prime ministers of countries don’t really have much to say in terms of real body politics, then who runs the world from behind the scenes?”
The Bilderberg Group itself dates to the immediate post-World War Two era.
It was a very important element of the oligarchical structures of the Cold War period. That in and of itself is a pretty significant factor because what it meant was that it was one of the vehicles through which private financier oligarchical interests were able to impose their policies over what were nominally sovereign governments. The biggest scandal part of this whole Bilderberg organization is that it was heavily populated by people who came out of the World War Two Nazi apparatus and who were basically cleaned up, dusted off, and deployed to become a hardcore of the Cold War anti-Soviet structures in the West.
The Bilderberg Group and similar organizations are invoked under various terms, such as “‘one world government, new world order, an all-seeing eye, a Jewish-Masonic conspiracy. But not matter how you want to spin this thing,” Estulin points out, “it’s not a conspiracy theory. It’s a conspiracy reality. These organizations–the Bilderbergers, the Trilateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations, Bohemian Grove–they’re not the power centers of anything really. They’ve had an important role to play in the past, especially Bilderberger, but much less so today as its role has been diminished. Today these organizations, they’re basically conveyor belts of opportunities. The real decision making process is done at a much higher level. That said, it’s an important medium-sized organization where a lot of important decision making processes are [conducted] and passed on to higher organizations, higher entities, to where these debates are put together into a concrete policy initiative.”
There has been an almost complete news blackout of the Bilderberg Group and its meetings, thus allowing for the association to exist under the radar for much of its sixty year existence. “The media has always participated, talking about the mainstream press. They’re invited. They’re part of the Bilderberg conspiracy, Estulin argues.
When you look at the individuals and groups that attend these meetings, we see presidents, prime ministers, secretaries of state, royalty, billionaire financiers, presidents of the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank and so on. And, of course, among them you have the ‘fifth estate’–the New York Times, Washington Post, Le Monde, Economist, Wall Street Journal, Financial Times, etc., and they all attend these meetings with the understanding that whatever the information, the decisions and discussions that take place at these meetings, they’re never revealed in the mainstream press’ publications. The world’s media … are just a source to legitimize a lot of these policy decisions taken by the elitists at these meetings.
Estulin also discusses recent geopolitical and economic events–the foremost being the standoff between Western countries and Russia. He argues, for example, that Vladamir Putin’s de facto opening of the “gold window” for the first time since Richard Nixon closed it in 1971 is a game changer that will eventually have major repercussions for the US petrodollar and broader political economy. “Nothing happens by accident,” in terms of volatility and the financial sector, the author observes.
A lot of the decision making takes place at these meetings. They’re discussed. They’re ironed out. Obviously not all of that stuff can be controlled. But without any doubt whatsoever, especially some of the conditions and situations that affect society in general, a lower strata of society, they’re very much discussed at these meetings.
I’ll give you one example. At this year’s Davos meeting they discussed an important issue for the rest of us, which is ‘fiscal austerity.’ Fiscal austerity is something that the media–the fifth estate–is trying to sell to us as people as something positive in a sense because in an age when the economy is spiraling out of control, fiscal responsibility, fiscal austerity is important, because allegedly the governments’ are going to be penny-pinching, watching the spending. It’s nonsense! It has nothing to do with reality. Fiscal austerity, as far as the elite is concerned, is kind of a vague term which actually refers to cutting social spending and increasing taxes. That’s what fiscal austerity means.
And the effect is that the public sector is devastated, obviously, as all assets are privatized, public workers are laid off en masse, unemployment becomes rampant, health and education disappear, taxes rise dramatically, and then currencies are devalued to make all assets cheaper for the international corporations and banks to buy up while internally causing inflation, which of course increases the costs of fuel and food. In short, this vaunted fiscal austerity which allegedly helps save money for the lower classes, implies in real body politic social destruction, as the social foundations of nations and peoples are pulled from under them. States become despotic and oppress the people who actually are revolting against austerity policies, and they have a term for that as well, which is called the “sterilization” of society.
The True Story of the Bilderberg Group is now being produced as a feature-length documentary film that will debut at film festivals with a subsequent theatrical run in late spring (preview below). A movie based on the book has been attempted twice over the past several years but ran into unforeseen difficulties whereupon the project was abandoned. The initial US producer “was scared into giving up on the project.” (See December interview with Kris Millegan, Estulin’s US book distributor.) “Then another producer came along and, basically, he was bankrupted.” Then “three-and-a-half years ago a producer in Spain, who had a big name in Spain, he was bankrupted. If you believe in conspiracies or coincidence theories, three banks called in his loans all in the same day. The loans had nothing to do with the Bilderberg documentary. Finally, we decided to put our money–over $200,000 over the past three years–for getting this out there. Right now we’re in the final stages of postproduction. We’ve traveled to 11 countries, interviewed some of the biggest experts in the world, and we’re about three three weeks away from finishing this.”
The project is still in need of about $25,000 in funding to complete postproduction. Mr. Estulin has established a site at rockethub to accept donations toward this goal.
Additional information on Estulin and his work is available at danielestulin.com.
Professor James F. Tracy is an Associate Professor of Media Studies at Florida Atlantic University. James Tracy’s work on media history, politics and culture has appeared in a wide variety of academic journals, edited volumes, and alternative news and opinion outlets. James is editor of Union for Democratic Communication’s Journal Democratic Communiqué and a contributor to Project Censored’s forthcoming publication Censored 2013: The Top Censored Stories and Media Analysis of 2011-2012. Additional writings and information are accessible at memoryholeblog.com.
My theme for 2015 has been the assertion that this will be a year of shattered illusions; social, political, as well as economic. As I have noted in recent articles, 2014 set the stage for multiple engineered conflicts, including the false conflict between Eastern and Western financial and political powers, as well as the growing conflict between OPEC nations, shale producers, as well as conflicting notions on the security of the dollar’s petro-status and the security and stability of the European Union.
Since the derivatives and credit crisis of 2008, central banks have claimed their efforts revolve around intervention against the snowball effect of classical deflationary market trends. The REAL purpose of central bank stimulus actions, however, has been to create an illusory global financial environment in which traditional economic fundamentals are either ignored, or no longer reflect the concrete truths they are meant to convey. That is to say, the international banking cult has NO INTEREST whatsoever in saving the current system, despite the assumptions of many market analysts. They know full well that fiat printing, bond buying, and even manipulation of stocks will not change the nature of the underlying crisis.
Their only goal has been to stave off the visible effects of the crisis until a new system is ready (psychologically justified in the public consciousness) to be put into place. I wrote extensively about the admitted plan for a disastrous “economic reset” benefiting only the global elites in my article ‘The Economic End Game Explained’.
We are beginning to see the holes in the veil placed over the eyes of the general populace, most notably in the EU, where the elites are now implementing what I believe to be the final stages of the disruption of European markets.
The prevailing illusion concerning the EU is that it is a “model” for the future the globalists wish to create, and therefore, the assumption is that they would never deliberately allow the transnational union to fail. Unfortunately, people who make this argument do not seem to realize that the EU is NOT a model for the New World Order, it is in fact a mere stepping stone.
The rising propaganda argument voiced by elites in the International Monetary Fund and the Bank For International Settlements, not to mention the ECB, is not that Europe’s troubles stem from its ludicrous surrender to a faceless bureaucratic machine. Rather, the argument from the globalists is that Europe is failing because it is not “centralized enough”. Mario Draghi, head of the ECB and member of the board of directors of the BIS, tried to sell the idea that centralization solves everything in an editorial written at the beginning of this year.
“Ultimately, economic convergence among countries cannot be only an entry criterion for monetary union, or a condition that is met some of the time. It has to be a condition that is fulfilled all of the time. And for this reason, to complete monetary union we will ultimately have to deepen our political union further: to lay down its rights and obligations in a renewed institutional order.”
Make no mistake, the rhetoric that will be used by Fabian influenced media pundits and mainstream economic snake-oil salesmen in the coming months will say that the solution to EU instability as well as global instability is a single global governing body over the fiscal life of all nations and peoples. The argument will be that the economic crisis persists because we continue to cling to the “barbaric relic” of national sovereignty.
In the meantime, internationalists are protecting the legitimacy of stimulus actions and banker led policy by diverting attention away from the failure of the central planning methodology.
Mario Draghi has recently announced the institution of Europe’s own QE bond buying program, only months after Japan initiated yet another stimulus measure of its own, and only months after the Federal Reserve ended QE with the finale of the taper.
I would point out that essentially the moment the Fed finalized the taper of QE in the U.S., we immediately began to see a return of stock volatility, as well as the current plunge in oil prices. I think it should now be crystal clear to everyone where stimulus money was really going, as well as what assumptions oblivious daytraders were operating on.
The common claim today is that the QE of Japan and now the ECB are meant to take up the slack left behind in the manipulation of markets by the Fed. I disagree. As I have been saying since the announcement of the taper, stimulus measures have a shelf life, and central banks are not capable of propping up markets for much longer, even if that is their intention (which it is not). Why? Because even though market fundamentals have been obscured by a fog of manipulation, they unquestionably still apply. Real supply and demand will ALWAYS matter – they are like gravity, and we are forced to deal with them eventually.
Beyond available supply, all trade ultimately depends on two things – savings and demand. Without these two things, the economy will inevitably collapse. Central bank stimulus does not generate jobs, it does not generated available credit, it does not generated higher wages, nor does it generated ample savings. Thus, the economic crisis continues unabated and even stock markets are beginning to waver.
As demand collapses due to a lack of strong jobs and savings, it pulls down on the central bank fiat fueled rocket ship like an increase in gravity. The rocket (in this case equities markets and government debt) hits a point of terminal altitude. The banks are forced to pour in even more fiat fuel just to keep the vessel from crashing back to Earth. No matter how much fuel they create, the gravity of crashing demand increases equally in the opposite direction. In the end, the rocket will tumble and disintegrate in a spectacular explosion, filled to capacity with fuel but unable to go anywhere.
Oil markets have expressed this reality in relentless fashion the past few months. Real demand growth in oil has been stagnant for years, yet, because of stimulus, because of the real devaluation of the dollar, and because of market exuberance, prices were unrealistically high in comparison. The crash of oil is a startling sign that the exuberance is over, and something else is taking shape…
The disconnect within banker propaganda could be best summarized by Mario Draghi’s recent statements on the ECB’s new stimulus measures. When asked if he was concerned about the possibility of European QE triggering currency devaluation and hyperinflation, Draghi had this to say:
“I think the best way to answer to this is have we seen lots of inflation since the QE program started? Have we seen that? And now it’s quite a few years that we started. You know, our experience since we have these press conferences goes back to a little more than three years. In these 3 years we’ve lowered interest rates, I don’t know how many times, 4 or 5 times, 6 times maybe. And each times someone was saying, this is going to be terrible expansionary, there will be inflation. Some people voted against lowering interest rates way back at the end of November 2013. We did OMP. We did the LTROs. We did TLTROs. And somehow this runaway inflation hasn’t come yet.
So the jury is still out, but there must be a statute of limitations. Also for the people who say that there would be inflation, yes When please. Tell me, within what?”
Firstly, if you are using “official” CPI numbers in the U.S. to gauge whether or not there has been inflation, then yes, Draghi’s claim appears sound. However, if you use the traditional method (pre-1990’s) to calculate CPI rather than the new and incomplete method, inflation over the past few years has stood at around 8%-10%, and most essential goods including most food items have risen in price by 30% or more, far above the official 0%-1% numbers presented by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
But beyond real inflation numbers I find a very humorous truth within Draghi’s rather disingenuous statement; yes, QE has not yet produced hyperinflation in the U.S. (primarily because the untold trillions in fiat created still sit idle in the coffers of international banks rather than circulating freely), however, what HAS stimulus actually accomplished if not inflation? Certainly not any semblance of economic recovery.
Look at it this way; I could also claim that if international bankers lined up on a stage at Davos and danced the funky-chicken, hyperinflation would probably not result. But what is the point of dancing the funky chicken, and really, what is the point of QE? Stimulus clearly has about as much positive effect on the economy as jerking around rhythmically in tight polypropylene disco pants.
Japan and the ECB are in fact launching sizable stimulus measures exactly because the QE of the Federal Reserve achieved ABSOLUTELY NOTHING except the purchase of 5-6 years without total collapse (only gradual collapse). And what is the real cost/benefit ratio of that purchase of half a decade of fiscal purgatory? When the breakdown of debt and forex markets does occur, it will be a hundred times worse than if the Fed had done nothing at all. Which brings me to our current state of affairs in 2015, and the IMF plan to take advantage…
IMF head Christine Lagarde put out a press release this past week, one which was probably drafted for her by a team of ghouls at the BIS, mentioning the formation of what she called the “New Multilateralism”.
Lagarde begins with the same old song about accommodative monetary policy:
“Besides structural reforms, building new momentum will require pulling all possible levers that can support global demand. Accommodative monetary policy will remain essential for as long as growth remains anemic – though we must pay careful attention to potential spillovers. Fiscal policy should be focused on promoting growth and creating jobs, while maintaining medium-term credibility.”
Of course, as we have already established, monetary policy does nothing to inspire demand. So, what is a global syndicate of bankers to do? Promote maximum interdependency! Lagarde laments the impediments of the sovereign attitude:
“No economy is an island; indeed, the global economy is more integrated than ever before. Consider this: Fifty years ago, emerging markets and developing economies accounted for about a quarter of world GDP. Today, they generate half of global income, a share that will continue to rise.
But sovereign states are no longer the only actors on the scene. A global network of new stakeholders has emerged, including NGOs and citizen activists – often empowered by social media. This new reality demands a new response. We will need to update, adapt, and deepen our methods of working together.”
And here we have a more subtle insinuation of the planning and programming I have been warning about for years. Because national sovereignty is no longer “practical” in an economically interdependent world (a world forced into economic interdependency by the globalists themselves), we must now change our way of thinking to support a more globalist framework.
The first big lie is that interdependency is a natural economic state. Historically, economies are more likely to survive and thrive the LESS dependent they are on outside factors. Independent, self contained, self sustaining, decentralized economies are the natural and preferable cultural path. Multilateralism (centralization) is completely contrary and destructive to this natural state, as we have already witnessed in the kind of panic which ensues across the globe when even one small nation, like Switzerland, decides to break from the accepted pattern of interdependency.
Also, take note of Lagarde’s reference to the growing role that developing nations (BRICS) are playing in this interdependent globalized mish-mash. As I have been warning, the IMF and the international banks fully intend to bring the BRICS further into the fold of the “new multilateralism”, and the supposed conflict between the East and the West is a ridiculous farce designed only as theater for the masses.
Lagarde reiterates the IMF push for inclusion of the BRICS (new networks of influence) into the new system, as well as the IMF’s role as the arbiter of global governance:
“This can be done by building on effective institutions of cooperation that already exist. Institutions like the IMF should be made even more representative in light of the dynamic shifts taking place in the global economy. The new networks of influence should be embraced and given space in the twenty-first century architecture of global governance. This is what I have called the “new multilateralism.” I believe it is the only way to address the challenges that the global community faces.”
The IMF head finishes with my favorite line, one which should tell you all you need to know about what is about to happen in 2015. I have for some time been following the progress (or lack of progress) in the IMF reforms presented in 2010; reforms which the U.S. Congress has refused to pass. Why? I believe the reforms remain dormant because the U.S. is MEANT to lose its veto powers within the IMF, and the IMF has already made clear that lack of passage will result in just that.
“Against this backdrop, the adoption of the IMF reforms by the United States Congress would send a long-overdue signal to rapidly growing emerging economies that the world counts on their voices, and their resources, to find global solutions to global problems.
Growth, trade, development, and climate change: 2015 will be a rendezvous of important multilateral initiatives. We cannot afford to see them fail. Let us make the right choices.”
Why remove U.S. veto power? Because BRICS nations like China are about to be given far more inclusion in the IMF’s multilateralist order. In fact, 2015 is the year in which the IMF’s Special Drawing Rights conference is set to commence, with initial discussions in May, and international meetings in October. I believe U.S. veto power will probably be removed by May, making the way clear (creating the rationale) for the marginalization of the U.S. dollar in favor of the SDR basket currency system, soon to be boosted by China’s induction.
In 2015 what we really have is a sprint towards currency and market devaluation across the spectrum. India, Japan, Russia, Europe, parts of South America, have all been debased monetarily. The U.S. has as well, most Americans just don’t know it yet. The value of this for globalists is far reaching. They have at a basic level created an atmosphere of lowered economic expectations – a global reduction in living standards which will at bottom lead to third world status for everyone. The elites hope that this will be enough to condition the public to support centralized financial control as the only option for survival.
It is hard to say what kind of Black Swans and false flags will be conjured in the meantime, but I highly doubt the shift towards the SDR will take place without considerable geopolitical turmoil. The public will require some sizable scapegoats for the kind of pain they will feel as the banks attempt to place the global economy in a totalitarian choke hold. While certain institutions may be held up as sacrificial lambs (including possibly the Federal Reserve itself), the concept of banker governance will be promoted as the best and only solution, despite the undeniable reality that the world would be a far better place if such men and their structures of influence were to be wiped off the face of the planet entirely.
Brandon Smith is the founder of the Alternative Market Project, an organization designed to help you find like-minded activists and preppers in your local area so that you can network and construct communities for barter and mutual aid. Join www.Alt-Market.com today and learn what it means to step away from the unstable mainstream system and build something better. You can contact Brandon Smith at: [email protected].
By: Aaron Dykes, TruthStreamMedia –
Former General David Petraeus and former World Bank head Robert Zoellick are leading the Council on Foreign Relation’s latest push for an ‘integrated’ North America.
Today, these men are leaders of predatory global finance: Petraeus now heads KKR Global, the leveraged buyout firm, while Zoellick is a senior advisor to Goldman Sachs International. Both men were also in attendance at the secretive 2014 Bilderberg conference .
Petraeus and Zoellick are the co-chairs of the CFR’s North America: Time for a New Focus, a globalism blueprint they claim carries an “integration and sovereignty” approach that somehow meaningfully differs from the EU’s ‘shared sovereignty’.
According to Robert Zoellick, North America can become can be a “new growth market” under integration, rife with exploitable opportunities through a ‘doubling down’ of NAFTA-style policies that they expect 2016 presidential candidates to pursue.
Zoellick explicitly stated, “I hope that this report will provide an agenda for both [U.S. political] parties in the presidential elections in 2016.”
Hillary Clinton, for one, has already admitted that her orders are issued at the Council on Foreign Relations, while Jeb Bush, also a prospective candidate in 2016 authored a CFR report on immigration reform and is brother to the president who founded the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America, based on CFR blueprints for Building a North American Community.
Under the CFR’s vision, North America would focus on U.S. markets “in energy, robotics, biotech, software, and big data” and combine with Canada’s developed economy and natural resources and ‘reforms’ in Mexico that have helped ‘harmonize’ it with the U.S. banker-led vision for the continent.
The CFR report claims that: “The development and implementation of a strategy for U.S. economic, energy, security, environmental, and societal cooperation with its two neighbors can strengthen the United States at home and enhance its influence abroad.”
There is a particular focus on energy, with emphasis on boosted production expected from the Keystone pipeline, hugely expanded shale gas fracking operations and new markets for liquid natural gas. Another CFR report this month is The Shale Gas and Tight Oil Boom: U.S. States’ Economic Gains and Vulnerabilities, focusing on a predicted shift away from foreign oil dependence – as the dollar fades and its petrodollar privilege declines with it.
Under a “smart regional energy policy,” Mexico – and its natural gas supplies – would be chained into a North American power grid alongside the United States, while Americans-at large would be committed to carbon reductions and environmental austerity policies.
Robert Zoellick told the CFR’s Jonathan Masters in an interview:
“The report recommends expanding the [U.S.] electricity grid with Mexico, which could provide lower cost electricity because of lower cost natural gas. This support would show the Mexican public the benefits of reform.”
The United States can also do more to capture the full benefits of energy innovation. For example, the report recommends removing legal restrictions on exports of oil and liquid natural gas, which is important if the U.S. expects to draw continued energy investment, because investors need to receive a competitive world price for their products. The report identifies problems with infrastructure, such as the electricity grid or pipelines. In the case of pipelines, we note that Central America, a nearby region of fragility, has very high energy prices, and the eventual extension of natural gas pipelines and supplies to the region could support Central American democracy and growth.
The report notes that many of the gains of energy so far have been at the exploration and production stages. To truly capture the second stage—dependent on the use of lower priced energy—the three countries need to create the regulatory conditions for greater capital investment. When companies have to make a big capital investment, they need regulatory clarity with regard to topics such as safety, conservation, methane capture, and plans to deal with carbon. All three countries can be more competitive with better and more integrated energy policies. Also, we recommend, in particular, that the XL Pipeline should be approved.
The report also continues the trend of pushing for immigration reform, opening erasing borders to a globalized labor force, migrant workers, foreign consumer goods, service and finance and, of course, “harmonized policies” wherever possible.
Significantly, Petraeus – once a four-star general and head of the CIA – and Zoellick also recommend an office at the National Security Council for North America – making national security a matter of continental and global security. This creates a fundamental and important runaround of constitutional protections for the United States of America, its people and their sovereignty.
This report represents a major update in the pursuit of a North American Union introduced publicly circa 2005 with the CFR’s Building a North American Community and the signing of quiet trilateral agreements for the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America by President George W. Bush and his counterparts Stephen Harper and Vicente Fox in Canada and Mexico in 2006.
Media figures like Jerome Corsi and Lou Dobbs led the charge in exposing the global-corporate merger and criticizing the blackout in coverage of the events, with most of the corporate media eerily silent about these tectonic events on the North American continent.
Moreover, this North American merger joins the larger chorus of instituting global governance that has already sung loudly in the EU, and more softly in the African Union and various formative stages of unions Pacific, Latin/Pan-America and other global unions.
As Bilderberg investigative reporters Jim Tucker and Daniel Estulin have noted, the European Union was the result of a 50-year project launched as a major component of the Bilderberg meetings themselves, founded in 1954.
The insider connections of the European and American banking, political and industrial powers fostered a series of benchmarks to bind the continent together through progressive agreements to integrate first through the European Coal and Steel Community, the European Common Market and then various subsequent treaties before the European Union became a formal – and binding – institution.
Interestingly, Putin just signed a Russo-centric Eurasian Economic Union agreement for his corner of the world – complementing the Russian-led creation of the BRICS development bank, widely seen as a landmark move in shattering the petrodollar paradigm, yet clearly still another BRIC in the wall of the new world order global governance project.
The U.S. has also been pushing two important, but lesser known agreements to bind the world under Anglo-centric trading terms.
The secretive Trans-Pacific Partnership – to encompass the Asia-Pacific sphere (save China) – has been under negotiation for the last couple of years, though little of it has seen the light of public disclosure, while the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) would economically encircle the the European sector to create a corporate friendly atmosphere for Anglo-centric trade.
Some have blasted it as a trade off of national sovereignty for corporate sovereignty, a just and succinct analysis of the world.
As Pepe Escobar writes :
It should be noted that another vision of the Eurasian economic future is also on the horizon. Washington is attempting to impose a Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) on Europe and a similar Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) on Asia.
Both favor globalizing American corporations and their aim is visibly to impede the ascent of the BRICS economies and the rise of other emerging markets, while solidifying American global economic hegemony.
Gen. Petraeus, Zoellick and company are calling for Canada and Mexico to be included in the TTIP – as they already are with the Trans-Pacific Partnership – in the name of greater North American integration, and for U.S. leaders to focus on globalizing their home turf in the coming period after Obama.
Download and read the report from the Council on Foreign Relation’s website [PDF].
Aaron Dykes is a co-founder of TruthstreamMedia.com, where this first appeared. As a writer, researcher and video producer who has worked on numerous documentaries and investigative reports, he uses history as a guide to decode current events, uncover obscure agendas and contrast them with the dignity afforded individuals as recognized in documents like the Bill of Rights.
This plan has been in the works for a long time, but for some reason they’re kicking it up several serious notches of late, flooding the US borders while continuing to inject European countries with any immigrants they can from a variety of cultures.
What and who is behind it?
As usual, they give themselves away in their own documents and bloated speeches to their own inner circle. In particular, United Nations globalist fat cat Peter Sutherland, non-executive Chairman of Goldman Sachs and former BP CEO, never mind top Bilderberger and Trilateral Commission honcho, has come right out and stated their plan as plainly and arrogantly as possible.
It’s not clear that the comment made last week by Peter Sutherland, the UN’s special representative for migration, really counts as a “gaffe,” since Sutherland seems to have no sense that what he said might have been disturbing.
Sutherland was speaking to the British House of Lords, according to a BBC report published last Thursday, and said that the European Union should “do its best to undermine” the “homogeneity” of its member states, because “the future prosperity of many EU states depended on them becoming multicultural.”
He also, according to the Beeb, suggested “the UK government’s immigration policy had no basis in international law.” (Kind of a novel interpretation of the authority of international law over a state’s control of its borders, but that wasn’t the worst of it.)
The report goes on:
Mr Sutherland, who is non-executive chairman of Goldman Sachs International and a former chairman of oil giant BP, heads the Global Forum on Migration and Development, which brings together representatives of 160 nations to share policy ideas.
He told the House of Lords committee migration was a “crucial dynamic for economic growth” in some EU nations “however difficult it may be to explain this to the citizens of those states”.
Yes, I bet it is hard to explain to those citizens, especially when the UN rep looks like he’s in cahoots with the EU to multiculturalize Europe. Sutherland’s answer, of course, is that this is purely an economic problem (and where have we heard that before?)
An aging or declining native population in countries like Germany or southern EU states was the “key argument and, I hesitate to use the word because people have attacked it, for the development of multicultural states”, he added.
“It’s impossible to consider that the degree of homogeneity which is implied by the other argument can survive because states have to become more open states, in terms of the people who inhabit them. Just as the United Kingdom has demonstrated.”
[Sutherland] told the committee: “The United States, or Australia and New Zealand, are migrant societies and therefore they accommodate more readily those from other backgrounds than we do ourselves, who still nurse a sense of our homogeneity and difference from others.”
“And that’s precisely what the European Union, in my view, should be doing its best to undermine.”
That’s pretty straightforward, to say the least. Where does he get his hubris? They’re already doing it whether local officials want it or not.
The implementation of United Nations Agenda 21 has been eroding society’s fabric behind the scenes like termites eating out a building’s infrastructure, while bankster backed globalists like these mastermind the various tentacles manipulating humanity via their multinational banking, political and corporate stooges.
The Planned Immigration Crisis in the United States
Again, the plan has been in effect for quite some time, breaking down American borders and homogenizing their weakened populace in a deliberately devastated economy being more militarized by the day in preparation for a societal breakdown, the very one they’ve engineered.
In addition, it is bringing massive division in America as they once again employ the age old totalitarian maxim to “divide and conquer.”
Here’s how they’ve led up to now in the US:
Behind the endless throngs of desperate Central American children arriving on the U.S. border and a steady wave of illegal immigrants from Mexico and beyond is a covert plan for global economic warfare — those building up the world of globalization are tearing down the sovereignty and financial strength of the United States and Europe to make way for the coming corporate new world order.
A generation of sending American jobs offshore under NAFTA, GATT and the WTO, dumping cheap corn on Mexico thereby destroying millions of farming jobs and unleashing disruptive retailers like Wal-Mart upon the fragile economies of Latin America have created turmoil, uncertainty and rivers of human migration… and along with it bitter tension and discord over the dynamics of immigration, illegal immigration and the struggle for a lasting standard of living under the New World Order.
The globalist plan to wreck our national sovereignty has been unfolding for awhile now…things are just speeding up in recent months.
Is All This Brazen Enough Yet?
That’s the question to ask those refusing to wake up as we point out these obvious truths. The awakening lights fires under people and that’s a good thing, to get them off the fence and out of the perilous bewilderment state they’re in. There’s no place more dangerous than not only being on the defensive, but in a condition of fear and confusion.
That makes sitting ducks out of unaware humanity. But the tide is turning.
These entities are now pushing their program with abject impunity while humanity tries to wrestle with these issues on a corrupt, futile, and inept political level. It won’t be until they fully grasp the big picture of what is being perpetrated that they’ll have a true awareness of the scope of humanity’s planned takeover and the importance of not feeding the beast with their energy and cooperation any longer.
Knowledge and understanding eradicate fear, which is why their media minions make it so hard to connect the dots. But the veil is coming down at a terrific rate now and I expect we’re going to see some serious wrenches thrown into their machinery. And it comes through awake and aware individuals.
To empower others with the truth is our most important duty, especially at this perilous time in history.
Keep on no matter what.
By Zen Gardner
Significant changes that affect a great majority, but that are carried out by a minority, do not happen in short periods of time. They take a while to be thought out, incubated, developed and implemented. The slower the pace at which those changes occur, the better for those who attempt to implement change by stealth.
The transfer of wealth from the poorest to the richest is one example of the secretive way in which global power shifted from the hands of the many to those of a few global oligarchs. Such a transfer was cooked for a long time with the help of a low flame fire that made it very difficult to notice.
After robbing the working class of their savings, pensions, jobs and futures, the global oligarchs have now increased the fire of a plan that has been running parallel to the confiscation of wealth. They have shifted into third gear in their plan to confiscate the most important natural resource the planet has: The Oceans.
The plan to limit who has access to Earth’s largest source of life began long ago with the codification of policies that would be forced on nations by international groups whose leaders were not elected by the people of the world, but by a small group of powerful men and women.
The most important entity at the head of this movement to rob humanity of the natural riches they’ve inherited from generation after generation is the United Nations. The UN is at the top of a growing “Global Green Dictatorship”, says Dr. Eric Karlstrom. The terms of this global green dictatorship are codified on documents written by organizations like the UN, the Club of Rome and others. Those documents include Agenda 21, Sustainable Development Programs, the Wildlands Project, the UN Global Biodiversity Assessment and the World Heritage Treaty. To them we must add the Law of the Sea Treaty, which is the base for the confiscation of the world’s oceans that will be carried out by the United States and the other G7 countries on behalf of the globalist oligarchy.
To this end, US President, Barack Obama, announced Monday his intention to substantially expand the Pacific Ocean area closed to fishing and energy exploration, in order to create the largest protected marine area in the world. According to the Washington Post, Obama’s proposal would double the ocean surface that is completely protected.
Sustainable development and environmentalism are two of the flags used by globalists and their puppets to secure control of the world’s most important resources. At first, the total control of the planet’s resources will come in regional governance projects, such as the one proposed by Obama, but later they will be united in one big control grid whose power switch will be in the hands of the power elite.
“Regional Governance is the method whereby would-be rulers intend to control every aspect of our lives. Without the full implementation of Regional Governance, their plan for world dominance cannot succeed…. (Governance, as opposed to Government, means “control by rules, restrictions, and regulations.”). In order to subvert the sovereignty of the United States” and that of other nations that are heavily invested in the so-called protection of the environment, warns Dr. Karlstrom. The would be rulers indeed want to protect the environment, but not for the reasons that most people think.
The announcement made by Obama coincides with the second day of the conference of the Oceans in the State Department, and is a new step in Obama’s official agenda to combat climate change, which apparently has become one of the priorities of his second mandate.
Obama’s Executive Decree, which comes into force later this year after overcoming a period of public comment, seeks to expand a protected zone established by his predecessor, George W. Bush, in 2009.
This area, called Marine National Monument Pacific Remote Islands, covers the waters adjacent to seven islands already controlled by the U.S. and located in the Pacific between Hawaii and the Mariana Islands atolls.
Currently, protected waters include an area around the islands of about 225,300 square miles. Obama’s proposal would extend that protected area to more than 2 million square miles around each territory area. That extension would include Wake Island, Jarvis Island, Howland Island, Baker Island, Kingman Reef, and Palmyra Atoll and Johnston.
The same kind of proposals are being implemented all over the world. In Costa Rica, for example, 60% of its territory is already deemed as areas of conservation and its symbol of commitment to nature, the Cocos Island is awaiting the UN’s approval to become a World Heritage Site, which will effectively make it property of that organization.
“This area is the closest thing I’ve ever seen the pristine ocean,” said Enric Salam who works for National Geographic and has studied coral and atolls in that area since 2005. The United States is the country that has more control over the sea, with over 13% of the area of the oceans under its supervision, and is the second in the world behind China, that consumes fish and shellfish. If you think it is a bad idea that one country possesses such a large amount of oceanic territory, you are not going to like the endgame that the globalist elite have in store.
As it has been widely reported, regional governance is the first step in the plan to merge North America into the North American Union. Similar unions are being created in other continents through commercial and political alliances, which will ultimately become one single block of former sovereign nations under the control of a global oligarchy. “The Sierra Club, in cooperation with the IUCN and the UN, has re-mapped North America into 21 “bio-regions.”
Just as the United Nations requires for each designated World Heritage site, each bio-region is divided into three zones: 1) wildness area where human intrusion is forbidden, 2) buffer zones surrounding the wilderness area where human access is strictly controlled and limited, and 3) cooperation zones, where humans would be permitted to live, although their activities could be sharply circumscribed,” reports Karlstrom on his website Natural Climate Change, where he presents the most comprehensive analysis about the hoax know as the Green Revolution.
According to Wikipedia, UNESCO World Heritage sites such as a forest, mountain, lake, desert, monument, building, complex, or city, are maintained by the World Heritage Programme administered by the UNESCO World Heritage Committee, which is composed of 21 state parties elected by the UN General Assembly. Sites are designated under the auspices of the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) program on Man and the Biosphere (MAB).
At present, there are 851 sites listed in 141 countries. Of these, 660 are cultural, 166 are natural, and 25 have mixed properties. These sites include the most treasured historical cultural monuments in the world, such as Stonehenge, the Great Pyramids, the Great Wall of China, Machu Pichu, the Statue of Liberty, and the Old City of Jerusalem and its Walls. There are 41 World Heritage sites in Italy alone, including the actual cities of Venice, Assisi, Ferrara, Paladia, and Verona and the Historic Centres of Rome, Florence, Naples, Siena, Pienza, Urbino, not to mention several national parks and the Aeolian Islands.
A biosphere reserve is an international conservation designation, given by UNESCO under its Programme on Man and the Biosphere (MAB). Proscribed new uses of land are tools for implementing Agenda 21, the Convention on Biological Diversity, and other international (UN) agreements. As of May, 2008, the World Network of Biosphere Reserves includes 531 biosphere reserves in 105 countries and the world’s oceans are a key part of these biosphere reserves.
Just as the United States was charged with controlling the global economy through the petrodollar after World War II the UN and its agencies are now taking over the world’s oceans after exercising its control of large portions of land that includes forests, national parks, biological reserves, etc.
“The Law of the Sea Treaty originated in the 1970s as part of the United Nations’ redistributionist agenda known as the “New International Economic Order.” The convention covers such issues as fishing and navigation, but the controversy arose mainly over seabed mining,” reports Doug Bandow, from the Catho Institute.
“According to its supporters, we need LOST for a variety of reasons. The main one concerns the oil and gas resources in the outer limits of our extended continental shelf. The treaty’s proponents say we can obtain legal title to it only by signing on to the treaty,” says Edwin Feulner. So, it is not about saving the environment, it is about concentrating power over Earth’s resources in fewer hands. But it goes beyond control of resources. It is also about having more power to expand the positioning of the largest military force on the planet, which will undoubtedly do the work of those who control the UN.
According to the PEW Charitable Trusts, the Law of the Sea Treaty would, among other things “grant the United States worldwide commercial access to undersea communications cables that keep America connected across the globe, allow the U.S. military to be in the strongest possible position to protect our legal rights to move through and over the world’s oceans and it would also strengthen America’s claim to the full outer continental shelf.”
“In the case of Alaska, this would extend U.S. sovereignty 600 miles offshore, instead of the current 200-mile limit.” The catch on all this is that such increase in the control of the oceans and the expansion of military power would not be in the hands of the United States per se, but on the hands of those who control the US government.
Luis R. Miranda is the Founder and Editor of The Real Agenda. His 16 years of experience in Journalism include television, radio, print and Internet news. Luis obtained his Journalism degree from Universidad Latina de Costa Rica, where he graduated in Mass Media Communication in 1998. He also holds a Bachelor’s Degree in Broadcasting from Montclair State University in New Jersey. Among his most distinguished interviews are: Costa Rican President Jose Maria Figueres and James Hansen from NASA Space Goddard Institute. Read more about Luis.
Over the last couple weeks I have been glued to the true story “The Lone Survivor,” where four of America’s finest Navy SEALs of “Operation Red Wings” were sent to do some reconnaissance concerning terrorists in Afghanistan.
Right from the start it seemed very clear that the special op was cursed. All the way from herdsman coming directly into their particular position where they were discovered (they could not terminate the compromise of being discovered because of Rules of Engagement), to being surrounded by 200 Taliban while they were waiting and expecting to be extracted but could not (their radio signal was too weak to reach headquarters). Then there was the downing of two Chinook helicopters (two apache helicopters would have given them cover, but they were grounded). All circumstances around this operation seem very strange both from within and from without. Tragically, three of the four SEALs were killed. What began to catch my attention was when Marcus Luttrell said about the enemy, “They knew exactly where we were.”
Taking it a step further, I began to listen to Marcus Luttrell’s CD version of the book “Lone Survivor,” and some of the things that were said seemed to pop out at me. Marcus said, “It seemed like we were oftentimes chasing shadows.” He would explain how the terrorists would diminish and would come again all loaded up.
Friends, from an outsider looking in it seemed as if the soldiers on both sides of the battlefield were being played on a chessboard. Who is creating the wars our boys are dying in? And for whom does it work?
I can just hear some state-run media minded individual saying, “Are you kidding me? Didn’t you watch the news last night?”
I know that there is still 21 percent of the population that believe in what they (the state-run media) promulgate through their lies, but let me set this straight, using words right out of the mouths of those I mean to expose:
“We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected the promises of discretion for almost 40 years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.”
– David Rockefeller, in an address to a Trilateral Commission meeting, June 1991
We know that President George H.W. Bush, on Sept. 11, 1991, called for a “New World Order”, and keep in mind their method is “Order out of Chaos.” Who is creating the chaos? Those who are taking control after the chaos has been created.
Then came Sept. 11, 2001.
We know that after 9/11, Americans were told that they were attacked by “radical Islamic terrorists.” Thirteen years later, Americans are now being labeled by this administration as terrorists because they resist Obama’s lawless and unconstitutional policies, as he releases self-proclaimed terrorists to “fight Americans another day.”
We also know that after 9/11, it was not the Taliban that asked the American people to give up rights that hundreds and thousands have fought, bled and died to give us; it was the American government that did, and they continue to do so by the force of circumstance.
We also know that Obama was in Europe before his presidency, telling the people that there is a need for a “New World Order,” an “International Order” and that “There isn’t any other way.” So, while America’s military is fighting off “terrorists” in other countries, this administration is attacking America.
- China calls for “New World Order”
- Russia calls for a “New World Order”
- The pope calls for a “New World Order”
We know that Henry Kissinger on May 31, 2007, said that those who oppose the New World order are “terrorists.”The devil loves for people to believe that it is God that they are honoring, when in fact the devil is behind the operation. There is no doubt that the devil is in the details concerning those who desire global government, and you know who they are in America by their absolute disdain and contempt of our enumerated forms of republican law. I am for peace. Yet I believe that we always need to be prepared for war to maintain peace (Psalm 120:7). I also want to make sure that we are not working for the enemy in the process of bringing forth our own demise, through the destruction of others, because of some self-proclaimed elitists who want to establish a one-world government. Speaking of Josef Stalin’s totalitarian government, Condoleezza Rice said, “The system of terror was essential to Stalinism. … Terror was the creation to mold politically the control that they wanted.”
Video: Respecting the Office
One thing is for sure, and there is no doubt, “terrorism” is working for the global community to strengthen their alliances toward a one-world government.
Remember, as President James Madison rightfully said, “If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy.”
If America would simply read the warnings from our forefathers, then she would not be made a fool of ill-designing men. Neither would our soldiers who die on the battlefield through unconstitutional wars. If this were not the case, then what did Kissinger mean when he said, “Military men are just dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy”?
Next question: Who are the terrorists?
Listen to Bradlee Dean on the radio six days a week! (www.SonsOfLibertyRadio.com)
Bradlee Dean is a syndicated columnist for WorldNet Daily, nationally syndicated talk-show host of the Sons of Liberty Radio, ordained preacher, and musician. Combined with his constitutional forefather style of writing, what makes him unique from every other columnist is that he includes a video for every commentary he posts, blending the new age of video with the traditional written commentary. Bradlee Dean is also known for his bold stand of truth in the public square reflected in his recent lawsuit against Rachel Maddow and MSNBC. He speaks on college and high school campuses with his ministry, You Can Run But You Cannot Hide International. Who is Bradlee Dean? Twitter @BradleeDean1 – Facebook : http://www.facebook.com/bradlee.dean.7?ref=ts&fref=ts
Why mince words when the planet’s being destroyed and we’re all being systematically murdered?
When it finally dawns on you what these New World Order elite globalists are up to it can be staggering. And it can’t be more in your face than it is right now.
We have chemtrails continually ‘playing’ on the world’s biggest screen, our skies–horrific displays of absolute disregard for all things living. And yet the majority doesn’t even see them and there’s total silence about it from authorities and the media.
Flocks of birds are falling from the sky and millions of dead fish are washing up on our shores, and they all act dumb, like they have no idea what the hell is going on.
The Gulf of Mexico has been killed, the vital loop current disrupted, the weather shot to hell, the food and water are deliberately poisoned and altered, and then they screw with the stratosphere and magnetosphere with a host of devilish devices.
Never mind the deliberately trashed economy and the fabricated ‘war on terror’ while the police state clampdown continues.
And we’re not supposed to notice?..or think this is deliberate destruction of our world?
Enter the Two Man Wrecking Crew
And so they trot out a “friendly, respectable face” for this deliberate destruction and depopulation, hoping we won’t notice the havoc being wreaked in front of our eyes, all the while making us think they’re doing us a favor and ‘pioneering our future’.
..And with a message straight from the Bilderbergers which seems to say..
‘It’s time to step up the depopulation plan.’
So good, so clean, so ‘successful’, so giving……….Right.
Bill and Melinda Gates Tapped To Be ‘The Friendly Face of Eugenics”
As F. William Engdahl in Financial Sense wrote:
Microsoft founder and one of the world’s wealthiest men, Bill Gates, projects an image of a benign philanthropist using his billions via his (tax exempt) Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, to tackle diseases, solve food shortages in Africa and alleviate poverty. In a recent conference in California, Gates reveals a less public agenda of his philanthropy—population reduction, otherwise known as eugenics.
Gates made his remarks to the invitation-only Long Beach, California TED2010 Conference, in a speech titled, “Innovating to Zero!.” Along with the scientifically absurd proposition of reducing man-made CO2 emissions worldwide to zero by 2050, approximately four and a half minutes into the talk, Gates declares, “First we got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.” (author’s emphasis).
Hard To Believe?
Watch this short clip for yourself if you haven’t seen it yet, as he builds false premise upon false premise, like they all do as if we’re stone cold idiots, and then he gives his chilling solution on how to “Innovate to Zero”…
The Decade of Death
By the way, they’ve set a goal for their vaccine program they love so much. Is this a signal to their own?
Bill and Melinda Gates Pledge $10 Billion in Call for Decade of Vaccines
DAVOS, Switzerland — Bill and Melinda Gates announced today that their foundation will commit $10 billion over the next 10 years to help research, develop and deliver vaccines for the world’s poorest countries.
“Incredible impact”, alright.
And Not Just Vaccines, Folks…
Besides vaccines, the Gates are funding 10 different projects researching new contraception methods, including their latest that involves sterilizing men by putting ultrasound on their testes. (Nice one, Bill. Hope you’re trying it out nightly.)
But more importantly, the Gates of Hell also fund two other major thrusts towards the destruction of earth’s eco-system and the extermination of its inhabitants: geoengineering (chemtrails et al), and genetically modified organisms or GMOs.
Bill Gates has already proven his interest in geoengineering schemes with his earlier co-patent filing for reducing the intensity of killer hurricanes. So perhaps we’re not too surprised that Science Insider has dug up the Microsoft chairman’s past projects on altering the Earth’s climate, ranging from filtering carbon dioxide to reflecting sunlight via brighter clouds. Source
‘Gates Foundation Funded Approval of Genetically Modified Mosquitos’
Bill Gates, who recently bought 500,000 shares of Monsanto stock, is reportedly funding the approval of genetically modified mosquitoes. It seems that not only will genetically modified salmon enter the environment along with unforeseen changes, but a new self-sterilizing mosquito may be joining them.
The plan, concocted by United Nations’s Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, involves creating genetically modified mosquitoes that either kill or sterilize themselves.The United Nations’ aim is to combat Dengue fever through the genetic manipulation of nature.
As with other genetically modified organisms, the long-term repercussions are widely unknown, and introducing a genetically modified creature into the environment may make for the genetic coding of an entire species to be altered. Source
The Monsanto Connection
Besides funding and profiting tax free from this horrific company, there’s an ‘image problem’ there too for which they’re trying to use Bilderberg Bill and Melinda.
The immediate impact of these partnerships is to enhance the public image of Gene Giants that are donating royalty-free genes to needy farmers. But the longer-term goal is to create the “enabling environments” (biosafety regulations, intellectual property laws, positive media coverage to promote public acceptance) that will support the market introduction of genetically engineered crops and related technologies. It’s a package deal – wrapped in a philanthropic façade – and it comes with strings attached…(Source) (emph.-ed)
Meet ‘Kill Bill’–enhancing the public image of death and depopulation
The Elite Call To Arms?
For those of you ‘awake and aware’ to what’s going on, that the world’s self-appointed ‘elite’ are planning a great ‘culling of the herd’ comes as no surprise. What’s remarkable is how blatant they’ve become about the subject.
This possibly denotes two things:
1.They feel comfortable with how well they’ve programmed and entranced most of society to accept such nonsense as global warming and carbon footprints, never mind the mythical ‘war on terror’ and a host of other lies.
2. They’re signaling to their own the program’s ratcheting up.
And the Bill and Melinda Gates (of Hell) Foundation is the new poster child and sanitizing ploy. But while every effort is being made to give the Gates Foundation a benign, philanthropic appearance, their primary program is clearly population reduction, just wrapped in brighter elitist “do gooder” package. “Awwwww. Look how they’re giving back and leading these new technologies…” Right…just wait and see.
But they’re throwing everything at it. And telling the others it’s time to throw in as well.
“A Time To Give, Brethren”
President Barack Obama met with Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Chairman Warren Buffett and Microsoft Corp. co-founder Bill Gates this morning at the White House to discuss the economy and the billionaires’ philanthropic endeavors, an administration official said.
Obama called for the Oval Office meeting, which also included Gates’ wife, Melinda, to discuss the Giving Pledge project, started by Buffett and Gates to encourage wealthy U.S. individuals and families to give most of their fortunes to charity, the administration official said, speaking on condition of anonymity. (source)
Why not. The old money will soon be worthless when we go through the ‘transition’ they have planned for us. “Use it for a good cause men. We’re gonna make the earth our own private country club!”
Still wondering? Why do you suppose they just locked up supplies of all the world’s natural seeds in an underground vault in Norway, but are busy altering the genetic make up of the seeds WE’RE supposed to eat?
Think about that.
Norway seed vault
And why are they feverishly burrowing their monstrous underground cites while trashing the environment on the surface of the earth? Oh, you don’t know about that? Or don’t believe it or “they woulda told us”? Please, pull your head out.
Are they preparing to board their underground ‘arks’?
Yeah, it’s ugly stuff to hear about. Would you rather just let the train run over you and I and others not say anything?
Sorry to say, this isn’t theory, it’s fact. Read up on “depopulation” and “eugenics” and you’ll find this has been their MO for centuries, periodically “culling the herd” with wars and epidemics, gutted economies and famines, all while keeping the world in one form of social slavery or another. It’s nothing new. It’s just that the expanding growth of humanity is accelerating at such a rate, our numbers frighten them, and besides, they want all those resources for themselves.
Have you noticed they tend to hoard slightly? The Rothschilds alone are worth an estimated 500 trillion dollars..with a ‘T’. The queen of England and the Vatican could bail out AND support half the world.
They’re not real big on sharing if you haven’t noticed, yet they make you feel guilty for devouring the earth’s resources.
Why believe anything they say?
This is how they view us. We’re now chillingly referred to as “human resources”. Spot your social ‘security’ number?
Bill Gates is one of many eugenicists, but he’s channeling gobs of money and a lot of perceived clout, and apparently they think he has the image to pull this off.
That global warming and the other scams still have such traction is hard to believe, but that’s the image the media is portraying. And people are swallowing it, I’m sorry to say, and will likely sit back and watch our demise and blame themselves for it. A neighbor mentioned something weird yesterday and added, “Do you think it’s God’s way of punishing us for what we’ve done to the planet?”
I know. Lunacy. It’s endemic.
The manipulated masses have been so dumbed down and indoctrinated, if the adulterated planet doesn’t kill them, they will practically volunteer for death to reduce their carbon footprint. That’s the cumulative effect and logical deduction you could arrive at. And it’s all by design.
It’s amazing to behold. People get all snotty about their energy saving Prius or recycling efforts, while joining hands and singing kumbaya with benign exterminator Bill and his conniving ilk over ‘the woes of global warming and human swarming’. Little do they know what their “final solution” really is.
This mass mind manipulation of guilt and lies is the drumbeat of the elites, while we sw-allow their planet destroying programs and march into the chemtrail sunset trying to eliminate our carbon footprints.
Only one way to do that…..
How manipulated are you?
Stay conscious. They’re spraying hard, closing down on our food supply, and more fabricated troubles are on their way. Keep your loved ones close and spread the word to the hungry.
On June 5, the London Evening Standard headlined “No minutes, no press conferences – just the world’s power brokers chewing the fat on the issues of the day. It’s the Bilderberg conference – and it’s coming to a suburb near you.”
On June 6, it convened. It continued through June 9. It’s a rite of spring. A previous article said British political economist Will Hutton calls attendees the “high priests of globalization.”
Powerful movers and shakers have their own agenda. They’re up to no good. They meet annually face-to-face. They conspire, collude and collaborate against populist interests. Their’s alone matter.
According to Bilderberg Meetings.org:
“Founded in 1954, Bilderberg is an annual conference designed to foster dialogue between Europe and North America.”
“Every year, between 120 -150 political leaders and experts from industry, finance, academia and the media are invited to take part in the conference.”
“About two thirds of the participants come from Europe and the rest from North America; one third from politics and government and the rest from other fields.”
“The conference is a forum for informal, off-the-record discussions about megatrends and the major issues facing the world.”
“Thanks to the private nature of the conference, the participants are not bound by the conventions of office or by pre-agreed positions.”
“As such, they can take time to listen, reflect and gather insights. There is no detailed agenda, no resolutions are proposed, no votes are taken, and no policy statements are issued.”
“The 61st Bilderberg meeting will take place at the beginning of June 2013 in the UK.”
Earlier articles discussed their agenda. Their ideal world isn’t fit to live in. Democracy is verboten. They want one world government. They want unchallenged global dominance.
Their wish list includes universal rules they set, centralized global control, perpetual crises and wars, NATO operating worldwide, abolishing the middle class, establishing ruler-serf societies, and having unchallenged wealth and power in their hands.
They want what they say goes enforced as policy. Obedient serfs can expect subsistence crumbs at best. Non-believers will be eliminated. New world order priorities alone matter.
Bilderberg’s Steering Committee includes a dozen prominent Americans. David Rockefeller’s called an Advisory Group member.
It’s uncertain if he’s attending. A published list excludes his name. He’s called the master spider for good reason. He’s been dominant for decades. On June 12, he turns 98. He’s fading. Who’ll replace him isn’t clear.
In her book “Web of Debt,” Ellen Brown quoted economist/geopolitical analyst Hans Schicht saying:
“What has been good for Rockefeller, has been a curse for the United States. Its citizens, government and country indebted to the hilt, enslaved to his banks.”
“The country’s industrial force lost to overseas in consequence of strong dollar policies (pursued for bankers not the country.”
Rockefeller’s no longer the force he once was. “(S)ixty years of dollar imperialism (is ending). The day of financial reckoning is not far off any longer.”
“With Rockefeller’s strong hand losing its grip and the old established order fading, the world has entered a most dangerous transition period, where anything could happen.”
Bilderberg rogues plan a world unfit to live in. They may end up destroying it in the process. It’s hard imagining a more malevolent force. US members reflect the worst of what it stands for. More on some prominent ones attending below.
They’re meeting at Britain’s five-star Grove Hotel. It’s 18 miles from London. It’s ideal for secluded meetings. While ongoing, police state security’s enforced.
Operations go on round-the-clock. Area residents have to show police passports, drivers licenses, or other accepted photo IDs to go home, to work, or attend to other personal business.
Civil liberties are suspended. De facto martial law’s in force. What Bilderberg rogues want they get. They want the worst of all possible worlds spread globally.
Prominent American attendees in alphabetical order include:
He’s a former Lehman Brothers partner. He left before its dissolution. Perhaps he helped push it over the edge. He was Clinton’s Deputy Treasury Secretary. He’s a Bilderberg Steering Committee member.
He’s founder and executive chairman of Evercore Partners. It’s a prominent predatory investment banking advisory firm. It specializes in mergers, acquisition, divestitures, restructurings, financings and other strategic transactions.
It operates the old-fashioned way. It recommends leveraged buyouts, asset-stripping targeted companies, and leaving thousands of employees high and dry on their own.
He’s Amazon’s founder and CEO. It’s the world’s largest online retailer. Earlier he worked on Wall Street and for a New York-based hedge fund.
In March 2013, Forbes estimated his net worth at $25.2 billion.
He’s Harvard University Professor of Economics. From 1982 – 1984, he was Reagan’s Council of Economic Advisors chairman and chief economic advisor. He’s National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) president emeritus. It’s an elitist organization.
Many of its members have been conservative Nobel economics laureates. Others served as White House chairmen of the Council of Economic Advisors.
It’s well known for announcing when recessions begin and end. It does so inaccurately. It ignores an ongoing protracted Main Street Depression.
In 2006, Feldstein was on Bush’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board. In 2009, he served Obama in a likewise capacity.
His other affiliations include the Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, and American Enterprise Group among others. He been a board member of several major corporations.
A previous article discussed his legacy of shame. His rap sheet includes various Treasury posts, IMF Policy Development and Review director, New York Fed president, vice chairman of the Fed’s Open Market Committee (FOMC), and Obama’s Treasury Secretary.
He partnered with former Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson and Fed chairman Ben Bernanke. They planned the grandest of grand thefts. They implemented banker bailouts.
They looted the federal treasury. They stuck taxpayers with the bill. They debased the currency. They transformed America into an unprecedented money making racket.
He and other Bilderberg rogues want spread globally what they did to America. They conspired with their EU partners doing the same thing to Western Europe.
They bear full responsibility for today’s global economic crisis. They planned it for greater wealth and power control.
He’s Washington Post Company chairman and CEO. His holdings include TV stations, municipal cable systems, and Kaplan, Inc. It provides higher education testing, training, and professional courses. It’s ethically and legally challenged.
It specializes in ripping off students. It does so for profit. It features scams and other fraudulent schemes. It sacrifices education for bottom line priorities.
It’s faced numerous lawsuits. In 2007, a class-action one on overcharging was settled. It shows no signs of changing its ways. Doing business the old fashioned way matters most.
Robert D. Kaplan
His articles are featured in numerous scoundrel media publications. Defense Secretary Robert Gates appointed him to the Defense Policy Board. Bill Clinton and George W. Bush reportedly sought his counsel.
In 2011, Foreign Policy magazine called him one of the world’s “top global thinkers.” He’s Stratfor Global Intelligence chief geopolitical analyst. According to Professor Daniel Drezner:
“What Kaplan and George Friedman share is a sense of geographical determinism that allows them to claim predictive powers.”
They and likeminded ideologues advance amoral national interest priorities. Resource control weighs heavily.
Professor Robert Farley added:
“Kaplan’s talent is to tell the powerful what they want to hear with the veneer of both theoretical insight and empirical knowledge, while possessing neither.”
His book “Balkan Ghosts” allegedly influenced Clinton’s thinking on Serbia, Bosnia and Kosovo. Its dark side analysis characterized Yugoslav people as primitive and violent.
He calls Iran a potential regional hegemon. He says “Iranians do respond to pressure, but it has to be extreme.”
At an earlier Davos World Economic Forum meeting, Stratfor’s George Friedman addressed Iran saying, “There is a solution to (weapons) proliferation, and this is bombing them.” Perhaps Kaplan’s view is likeminded.
Previous articles discussed him. He was an early architect of new world order harshness.
He’s a notorious war criminal. His rap sheet includes three to four million Southeast Asian war deaths.
He was instrumental in overthrowing Chile’s democratic government. Augusto Pinochet replaced Salvador Allende. Reign of terror arrests, killings, torture and neoliberal harshness followed.
He backed Suharto’s brutal dictatorship. His Kopassus special forces terrorized Indonesians. Their record includes kidnappings, rape, torture, targeted killings, sweeping violence, mass murder, and other atrocities against anyone challenging his authority.
He supported his West Papua takeover. He OK’d his East Timor invasion. Over two hundred thousand East Timorese died. Around half a million more were displaced.
In two months, 10% of the population was annihilated. It was prelude for what followed.
Kissinger supported the Khmer Rouge’s rise to power and reign of terror. He encouraged a Kurdish revolt against Saddam Hussein. He then abandoned them. He advised Bush and Cheney on Iraq policy.
He backed a 1974 Cypriot fascist coup. He defended Turkey’s brutal invasion. He was complicit in Operation Condor. Pinochet and other Latin American despots reigned terror against alleged communists and political opponents. Tens of thousands perished.
He supported Pakistan’s “delicacy and tact” in overthrowing Bangladesh’s democratically elected government. Half a million deaths followed.
In 1974, his secret National Security Study Memorandum 200 (NSSM 200) called for drastic global depopulation. Developing nations are resource rich, he said. They’re vital to US growth.
He wanted useless eaters eliminated. He said “Depopulation should be the highest priority of US foreign policy towards the Third World.”
He supported involuntary mass sterilizations. He wanted birth control made a prerequisite for US aid. He wanted hundreds of millions eliminated by 2000.
He endorsed the worst of Israeli crimes. He deplores peace. He supports war and state terror. He symbolizes the worst of imperial lawlessness.
He’s co-chairman and co-CEO of Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. (KKR). It calls itself “a leading global investment firm with deep roots in private equity, diversified capabilitiesâ€¦.decades of financial and operational experience, broad industry knowledge, and a powerful network of global relationships.”
It specializes in leveraged buyouts. It asset-strips companies for profit. It dumps thousands of employees doing so. It makes money the old fashioned way. Bottom line ones alone matter.
Forbes estimates his net worth at $4.5 billion. Balzac once said behind every great fortune lies a great crime.
Jessica T. Mathews:
She’s a Bilderberg Steering Committee member. She’s Carnegie Endowment for International Peace president. From 1977 – 1979, she was National Security Council Office of Global Issues director.
She held various other executive and legislative government posts. From 1980 – 1982, she was a Washington Post editorial board member.
Her husband is retired four-star Air Force General Charles G. Boyd. He’s a Council on Foreign Relations program director. He’s Business Executive for National Security president. He’s a prominent Project on National Security Reform member.
He’s a Bilderberg Steering Committee member. He’s known as “the prince of darkness.” He’s a prominent uberhawk. He favors conflict over diplomacy. He served as Reagan’s Assistant Secretary of Defense and Global Strategic Affairs. He was GW Bush’s Defense Policy Board Advisory Committee chairman.
He’s associated with the Project for the New American Century and American Enterprise Institute. Both organizations figured prominently in post-9/11 wars.
His other affiliations include the Hudson Institute, pro-Israeli front group Washington Institute for Near East Affairs (WINEP), the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (JINSA), and Center for Security Policy among others.
He gained prominence as US Central Command head, International Security Assistance Force commander, and CIA director. Defrocking followed Petraeusgate.
A previous article said forget resignation over extramarital sex. Lots of elected and appointed Washington officials had affairs. Many likely have current ones.
Numerous former presidents had them. Defrocking never forced any from office.
Competence didn’t earn Petraeus four stars. Former peers accused him of brown-nosing his way to the top. It made him a brand as much as general.
Talk earlier surfaced about his presidential aspirations. In 2007, Time magazine made him runner-up Person of the Year.
White House and media spin praised his stellar performance. Before he fell from grace, he was called aggressive in nature, an innovative thinker on counterinsurgency warfare, a talisman, a white knight, a do-or-die competitive legend, and a man able to turn defeat into victory.
His former commander, Admiral William Fallon, called him “a piece of brown-nosing chicken sh**.”
He’s more myth than man. His failures were called successes. His career advanced by being super-hawkish, brown-nosing the right superiors, lying to Congress, surviving the scorn of some peers, hiding his failures, hyping a fake Iranian threat, supporting Israel, unjustifiably claiming Iraq success, and boasting how he’d do it throughout the region.
He manufactured successes. He concealed failures. He’s out of the public spotlight but not gone.
In March 2013, he became honorary Office of Strategic Services (OSS) chairman. It was the CIA’ s predecessor organization.
He’s also a City University of New York visiting professor. In May, UCLA named him Judge Widney Professor. He’s Currahee Board of Trustees president. KKR named him KKR Global Institute chairman.
He formerly chaired Goldman Sachs and Citigroup. He served as Clinton’s Assistant to the President for Economic Policy, National Economic Council head and Treasury Secretary.
Time magazine once called him, Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan, and Deputy Treasury Secretary Larry Summers “The Committee to Save the World.”
They did more wrecking than saving. They helped get Glass-Steagall repealed. They influenced Commodities Futures Modernization Act (CFMA) passage.
It legitimized swap agreements and other hybrid instruments. They’re at the core of major financial problems. It prevented regulatory oversight of derivatives and leveraging. CFMA and Glass-Steagall’s repeal made Wall Street a casino operating on only the house wins rules.
CFMA legitimized derivatives scams. Enron took full advantage. It fleeced investors and energy purchasers with impunity. It did so until its house of cards collapsed.
At the time, Alan Greenspan endorsed derivatives. He lied calling them a way to share risks. They turned an economic downturn into a protracted Main Street Depression.
Clinton/Rubin/Summers/Greenspan/Bernanke/Paulson/Geithner, and other co-conspirators engineered it.
He’s Google executive chairman. Forbes estimates his net worth at $7.5 billion. He’s a regular Bilderberg attendee. A previous article discussed his close Bilderberg ties.
Infowars reporters Paul Joseph Watson and Jon Scobie said Google’s “merging” with Bilderberg.
It’s “being recast as ‘Google-Berg’ – partly because of efforts on behalf of activists to tear away the veil of Bilderberg’s much cherished secrecy, and partly as a means of re-branding authoritarian, undemocratic secret gatherings of elites as trendy, liberal, feel-good philanthropic-style forums like Google Zeitgeist and TED.”
Schmidt thinks “privacy is a relic of the past.” He “plans to turn Google into the ultimate Big Brother.”
He and Bilderberg members share common aims. In part, they reflect a “collectivist, permanently networked world (without) individuality and privacy.” They’re partnering for greater global control. Doing so makes Bilderberg’s ideal world unfit to live in.
He’s Australian born. He became a naturalized US citizen. From 1995 – 2005, he was World Bank president. Along with the IMF and other major international lending agencies, it debt entraps nations.
It wages financial war on humanity. It mandates structural adjustment harshness.
It prioritizes privatization of state enterprises, mass layoffs, deregulation, deep social spending cuts, wage freezes or cuts, corporate-friendly tax cuts, unrestricted Western corporate market access, trade unionism crushed or marginalized, and stiff repression targeting non-believers.
In 2005, Wolfsensohn founded Wolfensohn & Company. It’s a global emerging markets private equity firm. It advises governments and large corporations doing business in emerging market economies.
Since 2006, Wolfensohn’s also been Citigroup International Advisory Board chairman.
In 2009, he became a China Investment Corporation International Advisory Council member. In October 2010, he regained his Australian citizenship.
He’s a prominent neocon. He was a Project for a New American Century member. He advocated post-9/11 wars.
Paul Wolfowitz succeeded Wolfensohn as World Bank president. Zoellick succeeded him. He served from 2007 to 2012.
He formerly was a Goldman Sachs managing director, as well as Deputy Secretary of State and US Trade Representative under GW Bush.
Under Reagan, he held various Treasury positions. He was Counselor to James Baker, Executive Secretary of the Department, and Deputy Assistant Secretary for Financial Institutions Policy.
He was GHW Bush’s Under Secretary of State for Economic and Agricultural Affairs. He also served as Department Counselor.
In 1991 and 1992, he was Bush’s G7 summit representative. He 1992, he served as White House deputy chief of staff.
From 1993 – 1997, he was Fannie Mae executive vice president. He bears much responsibility for helping to inflate the housing bubble.
During George Bush’s 2000 presidential campaign, he was one among other self-styled “vulcans.” Others included Condoleezza Rice, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Armitage, Richard Perle, Stephen Hadley, Scooter Libby, and Dov Zakheim.
The term alludes to the Roman god of fire and metalworking.
Zoellick’s other past and present affiliations include Enron’s advisory board, Alliance Capital, Said Holdings, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Aspen Institute’s Strategy Group, former Defense Secretary William Cohen’s Defense Policy Board, and the Center for Strategic and International Studies among others.
Other notable Bilderberg attendees include IMF head Christine Lagarde, European President Jose Manuel Barroso, former appointed Italian Prime Minister Mario (three-card) Monti, Britain’s Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne, Goldman Sachs International chairman Peter Sutherland, as well as numerous other politicians, corporate bosses, investment firm heads, journalist insiders and others.
They comprise a virtual rogues gallery of scoundrels. An official list excludes likely figures kept private. Rumor suggests Obama and Britain’s David Cameron may attend. Perhaps we’ll know more later on.
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at [email protected]. His new book is titled “Banker Occupation: Waging Financial War on Humanity.” www.claritypress.com/LendmanII.html Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com. Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network. It airs Fridays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening. www.progressiveradionetwork.com/the-progressive-news-hour
“Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it.” – Adolph Hitler
It truly does amaze, in a particularly bone chilling fashion, reading the many mischievous musings of the fascist despot. What makes the feeling stronger and far more unpleasant is reading those quotes while looking at a picture of Barack Obama.
There is something about the combination of reading evil words and looking at a profoundly evil face that could make the strongest stomach turn like a ferris wheel.
Five years along on our American fascistic experiment and reading Hitler’s quotes makes it seem as though the young charlatan and ideological follower of anti-American anarchists like Alinsky Ayers is borrowing and applying their logic and pulling White House levers to drive his own demented vision of absolute power.
The recent assault on the First Amendment, only if to take a small break from the American Left’s constant assault on the Second Amendment, is a stark reminder of how easily snake oil salesmen, satanic preachers and megalomaniacs go off the deep end when left to their own devices.
Earlier this week, the Washington Post released details on the Justice Department’s targeting of a Fox News reporter as a potential “co-conspirator” in a leak probe. The sacrificial lamb being fed by the feds is insignificant intelligence analyst Stephen Jin-Woo Kim. Kim is accused of disclosing classified information to Fox reporter James Rosen. This event comes as no surprise since this Administration has prosecuted more national-security cases than any other in recent memory.
The scary part, and one which will lead us down a time warp back to the Weimar Republic, is that as part of its probe the Obama Administration obtained a warrant to search Mr. Rosen’s personal email account. This blatant invasion of privacy and violation of press freedoms has been coolly justified by telling the judge that Mr. Rosen was part of Kim’s conspiracy. This behavior is not as tragically comic as the logic behind it. Apparently, Rosen was party to a criminal conspiracy (which loosely amounts to treason) because he acted like a journalist and dared to apply his First Amendment privileges which are the backbone of his chosen profession.
In a May 2010 affidavit supporting the search warrant issue for Rosen’s Gmail account, FBI agent Reginald Reyes declared that “there is probable cause to believe that the Reporter has committed or is committing a violation” of the Espionage Act of 1917 “as an aider and abettor and/or co-conspirator.” The Reporter in question is Mr. Rosen.
Luckily for those of us with common sense and a functional set of eyeballs, this behavior does not call for detailed corroboration or evidence. Whether it’s selling guns to Mexican drug cartels for the express purpose of murdering American lawmen, covering up crimes against American officials carried out by Obama’s pet Islamists or merely using the IRS to strong arm anyone who would dare oppose Der Fuhrer, we’ve long ago learned that Obama’s intimidation tactics know no bounds and certainly, no shame.
But instead of rehashing all the ways that this modern fascist has besmirched the office of the POTUS, let’s instead look back and the underpinnings of Hitler’s Weimar Republic and how scary the similarities between the master and his apprentice really are…
Back to the Present
In 1933, an amendment was added to the Weimar’s constitution that would immediately play the key role Hitler’s rise to absolute power. This amendment essentially gave Hitler the legal right to make end runs around the Reichstag (Weimar lawmaking body, not unlike Congress in the U.S.) and full use of plenary power.
Plenary power is defined as, “The separate identification, definition, and complete vesting of a power or powers or authority in a governing body or individual, to choose to act (or not to act) on a particular subject matter or area.”
In plain English, it’s a dictatorial decree or if you’re more of a fan of fancy robes and lavish parties, a king’s coronation…
“When Congress refuses to act…I have an obligation to do what I can without them.” – Barack Obama
Though the American Left is too talented at public manipulation and Obama remains encased in a glass house in the land of plausible deniability, the similarities between the maddest man of the 20th century and certainly, the most inept American President in history are becoming more apparent by the day, if not by the hour.
Keep Your Poor and Hungry…I’ll Take Your Young
Much like his true ideological predecessor, Obama understands that it is minions he needs, not truth, not justice and definitely not anything resembling the American Way…
“He alone, who owns the youth, gains the future.” – Adolph Hitler
Recent statements by Obama’s Dr. Mengele, Ezekiel Emanuel (also, not shockingly the brother of ex-Obama staffer and recently anointed Lord of Chicago, Rahm) at a college commencement essentially dictating to the Obama Youth their duty to make The Fuhrer’s centralist health insurance plan further highlight the true goal of the Obama Administration’s dictatorial bent.
Now, it might seem unreasonable to the thoroughly soaked, soaped and spin cycled brain that all of this information should go so seamlessly together. But really, if you think about it…it is a steady dose of pressure that busts even the hardest pipe, not a loud chainsaw or some other overt mechanism.
There is a direct an inherent need for Obama’s fascism to simultaneously attack on so many fronts. After all, it wasn’t the Nazi’s military might or professed superiority that nearly conquered the world. It was just blitzkrieg.
Blitzkrieg is defined as an attacking force spearheaded by a dense concentration of armored and motorized or mechanized infantry formations and heavily backed up by close air support, which then forces a breakthrough into the enemy’s rear through a series of deep thrusts. Once in the enemy’s rear, it proceeds to dislocate them by utilizing speed and surprise and then encircle them.
This is an organized campaign of shock, awe, confusion, flashing lights, bells and whistles, designed not-so-much to defeat an opponent directly but more so tire him or her with stupidity and get them to self-disengage from the political discussion and process.
Meanwhile, indoctrinating a new generation of future journalists, bureaucrats, and generally middling talent and intellect allows for a far more pliable future fulfillment class.
This fulfillment class will be a lot more open to not making the same ‘mistakes’ of First Amendment utilization like James Rosen. They will be far happier and more eager to execute orders because they have been trained in the Hitler Youth veneer of cleaning up their society and purging it from undesirables simply by following their Fuhrer’s lead.
The real danger, however, is not the micro dictator himself. After all, even he will not be able to seek a third term, though his admittedly sycophantic admiration of Franklin Delano Roosevelt would make such dreams plausible, if not likely.
The real danger lies in the indisputable fact that Obama’s goal is and always has been the fundamental alteration of American society.
Much as Hitler’s ideology scorned anything German that came before, Obama’s America must be one with no cultural, political, economic or ideological connections to the one that came before.
This is why our press is increasingly dependent on the White House for what it “freely” publishes, this is why our kids further “rebel” against American values and this is why more and more of our teen cultural icons resemble Hitler Youth mannequins.
In the weeks to come, I will continue to explore the overt fascism practiced by the Obama Administration and how it has been structurally engrained in American academia and politics over the better part of the last half-century.
The reality is that the plan to turn the United States into a latter day Weimar Republic is one that was designed to take a century. Don’t get too excited about Obama, though. Just like Hitler, he’s simply a great pitchman for something far more sinister approaching…
More on it next time…
By JoAnne D. Byron, a contributor for Absolute Rights.
In the video below, Rockefeller protégé and operative Henry Kissinger calls for the United States and the authoritarian government of China to work together to create a globalist totalitarian government.
“The challenge is,” Kissinger told the Asia Society last week, “how to build a world order for the first time in history on a global basis. We talk a lot about world community but the fact is there has never been a world community before” and he then suggested China and the U.S. collaborate on such an effort.
David Rockefeller has paid homage to the communist Chairman Mao, the most prolific mass murderer of the 20th century (responsible for the liquidation of between 49-78,000,000 Chinese).
Rockefeller regards Mao as an ideal leader and the communist revolution and its murderous political purges as a template for world government.
“Whatever the price of the Chinese revolution [an indirect reference to millions killed] , it has obviously succeeded not only in producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but also in fostering high morale and community of purpose… The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao’s leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history,” Rockefeller wrote for the New York Times on August 10, 1973.
Rockefeller lavished praise on Mao and the communists three years before the end of the Cultural Revolution in China. Conservative estimates of the death toll exacted by Mao’s cultural purge exceed 30 million people.
Rockefeller’s trusted minion, Henry Kissinger, believes now is the time to export what Mao did in China to the entire world.
The UN warns that global food stores like grains are depleting at an expediential rate and when combined with failing harvests, there will be a food crisis in 2013.
The UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) explain that “we’ve not been producing as much as we are consuming. That is why stocks are being run down. Supplies are now very tight across the world and reserves are at a very low level, leaving no room for unexpected events next year.”
Since 2010, the FAO have stated that the rise in food prices is directly correlated to the 80 million people being added to the world’s population annually. This fact, according to the globalists at the UN, is beginning to “tax both the skills of farmers and the limits of the earth’s land and water resources.”
Added to this problem are the 3 million people who are “moving up the food chain” eating more than their share in gluttonous nations like the United States and China.
The World Bank issued a statement of concern last month for the coming food shortage due to the drought devastating the US and Europe. According to Jim Yong Kim, World Bank group president: “Food prices rose again sharply threatening the health and well-being of millions of people. Africa and the Middle East are particularly vulnerable, but so are people in other countries where the prices of grains have gone up abruptly.”
Corn yields in the US have succumbed to an infection known as aspergillus flavus which causes a carcinogenic toxin to manifest and renders the corn unfit for human consumption. In Iowa, cattle ranchers have reported that their livestock that ate the corn have died due to “toxic nitrate doses”.
Nitrate is not toxic to animals; however with the drought conditions causing a lack of access to water, the animals died due to complications. For humans, nitrate will cause blue baby syndrome and digestive tract cancers.
With an estimated 870 million people in the Middle East and Africa becoming malnourished, world environmentalists are saying that the global food supply system is heading toward collapse. Lester Brown, president of the Earth Policy Institute (EPI), asserts that our planet’s climate can no longer be trusted and that the demand for food from over-population is breaking the proverbial straw on the camel’s back. Brown says that “food shortages undermined earlier civilizations. We are on the same path. Each country is now fending for itself. The world is living one year to the next.”
Brown predicts that as “food supplies are tightening everywhere” and agricultural land is becoming a precious commodity, geopolitical perspective will shift from energy to necessity. He foretells of “armed aggression” focused on “food unrest”.
EPI is a foundation begun by Brown that focuses on influencing the global plan for an environmentally and economically sustainable world. Part of their goal is to coerce the media, social consciousness, lawmakers and governments to adhere to their ideals and examples of how to demonstrate an ecological civilization. Under the Obama administration, with the assistance of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) there is a palatable crisis being created because of mandates for ethanol production versus necessities for food.
The US investment in ethanol is a drain on the world’s food stores; which allocates massive amounts of food to the production of this plant-based fuel for cars instead of for human consumption.
Confirmed eugenicists Bill and Melinda Gates have allocated $17.6 to the UN World Food Program (WFP) to “provide nutritious food and support small-scale farmers.” In the end, the Foundation will give $10 million to the WFP. Instead of giving the money to the people in need of food and provisions, the Gates Foundation will be granting not only the UN through WFP, but also non-governmental organizations aligned with the UN such as Oxfam America, Mercy Corps and the Catholic Relief Services.
At this year’s UN Earth Summit Rio+20, goals for sustainable development in Africa and Asia center on their population growth, water supplies and food security. The sub-Saharan and northern regions of Africa, Latin America, the Caribbean and parts of Asia are of particular interest to the UN, as stated by UNICEF and the World Health Organization (WHO).
With the assistance of the UN, corporations have begun descending on Africa to aid in the securitization of their natural resources. Examples like an $11 million dollar project funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Cocoa-Cola Corporation are usurping 50,000 Kenyan and Ugandan smallholders to produce fruit for Minute Maid, a subsidiary for Cocoa-Cola.
“Africa is now the last frontier in terms of arable land,” said James Nyoro, the Rockefeller Foundation’s managing director for Africa. “With the population growing to 9 billion, the rest of the world will have to depend upon Africa to feed it.”
In February of this year, the Rights and Resources Initiative, a non-governmental organization was involved with the UN in a massive land-grab in Africa which displaced an estimated 500 million citizens from the sub-Sahara as well as targeted 346 billion acres of farmland for the purpose of securitizing food production.
According to a 2011 report released by the International Land Coalition, there is a rush by global networks to acquire land in the sub-Saharan region of Africa by foreign corporations and governments which is causing environmental and agricultural devastation along the River Niger in Africa.
The report states: “The siphoning of water for huge areas of farmland will worsen the already low water levels of the Niger.” The outcome was a “50 percent diminution of the delta flood plain’s land area. Given that social conflict over resources between farmers and pastoralists has always been a feature of the Niger Basin, the Coalition suggests that large-scale irrigation could heighten tension between local and downstream water users.”
In 2007 – 2008, land grabs by NGOs, multi-national corporations and international entities were a direct causation of the food crisis in developing nations by Saudi Arabia and South Korea.
President Barack Obama supports the UN’s land grab scheme with the installation of his $3 billion plan to securitize Africa’s food supply and agricultural farms. Obama wants to use Africa as a base for growing the world’s food supply, under his controlled initiatives.
This article was written by Susanne Posel and originally published at Occupy Corporatism
For those who have studied the musings of the global elites, one primary “theology” rises to the surface, and it is this theology that appears to be the apex motivation in everything that they do. This “religion”, as it were, does not revolve around the worship of any single deity. Though the globalists fancy themselves academics of mythology and secret spiritualisms, in the end, they do not seek to worship a god; rather, they desire to be “worshiped” as “gods”.
This hubris is best exposed in the works of “Technocrats”, “Futurists” and “Transhumanists”; a community of eugenics obsessed elites dabbling mostly in scientific fields that claim to only be interested in identifying or predicting “future trends”. In reality, they believe in ENGINEERING future trends. They hold that technological advancement supersedes all other social concerns, and, that “old beliefs” and principles must be constantly discarded to make room for the “new”, the “modern”, the “streamlined”, or the “centralized”, which they arbitrarily deem superior.
For them, the concept of evolution is not limited to biology. They feel that the “survival of the fittest” dogma must also be applied to cultural structures, as well as cultural values.
What proponents of futurist ideals salivate over is a kind of full-spectrum control over their environment, over nature, over genetics, over matter, and over the human mind. Their rationale for this pursuit? They think that they can do it all better than the original design! This assumption is summed up well in the words of Sir Francis Galton, the official founder of the Eugenics movement:
“What nature does blindly, slowly and ruthlessly, man may do providently, quickly, and kindly. As it lies within his power, so it becomes his duty to work in that direction.”
Or the pontifications of early transhumanist R.C.W. Ettinger:
“Humanity itself is a disease, of which we must now proceed to cure ourselves…Surely it will be an advantage to be able to ‘turn off’ or ‘tune out’ one’s emotions at will, choosing fully to savor only those that are enjoyable…”
Or the creepy zealotry of futurist Barbara Max Hubbard:
“Out of the full spectrum of human personality, one-fourth is electing to transcend…One-fourth is ready to so choose, given the example of one other…One-fourth is resistant to election. They are unattracted by life ever-evolving. One-fourth is destructive. They are born angry with God…They are defective seeds…There have always been defective seeds. In the past they were permitted to die a ‘natural death’…We, the elders, have been patiently waiting until the very last moment before the quantum transformation, to take action to cut out this corrupted and corrupting element in the body of humanity. It is like watching a cancer grow…Now, as we approach the quantum shift from creature-human to co-creative human—the human who is an inheritor of god-like powers—the destructive one-fourth must be eliminated from the social body…”
The manipulation of man’s world (or his perception of the world) by the elect is thus dramatized as an act of benevolence and kindness, or an act of survival necessity, while the collateral damage accrued in the process is presented as an acceptable price compared to the long and coldly arduous cycles of nature. The problem, however, is that the elites have forgotten to ask an eminently important question: Is the kind of control they hope to gain really possible?
The answer is, in fact, already known, and that answer is an emphatic “No”. Let’s set aside the obvious moral minefield involved in the act of playing god and examine the science of the matter, which is the only thing the elites care about anyway.
In order to achieve “godhood”, I think it would be fair to say that one must first have absolute knowledge of his surroundings. If unknowns exist, then one cannot be in control of the present, or, predict the future, and as Einstein once wisely stated, “God does not play dice…”
The Uncertainty Principle
The work of physicist Werner Heisenberg led to a groundbreaking pillar of quantum mechanics known as the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. Heisenberg surmised that in order to identify the future state of any object, one must know every aspect of its present state. And, to understand the object’s present state, one must have absolute knowledge of it down to the very particles that makes it what it is.
To determine the future state of a particle, like an atom, one must know at the very least it’s position, direction, and momentum. What Heisenberg discovered, though, was that any attempt to observe these qualities actually changed the nature of the particle. That is to say, there is no available method for mankind to observe a particle’s state without affecting it and redirecting it in an unknowable way. Most importantly, quantum mechanics shows us that infinite possibilities defy finite determinations. Even the act of looking at a thing can abruptly change a thing. Therefore, how can the elites believe it will ever be possible to mold their environment in a godlike fashion if the tools for such an endeavor do not and will never exist?
The Incompleteness Proof
The answer to the Uncertainty Principle would be to find a way to mathematically quantify “infinity”. If one can find a structure to infinity, then one can determine an infinite number of possibilities, and, thus, predict all possible outcomes. The elites are thwarted again, though, by a brilliant mathematician and close friend of Albert Einstein named Kurt Godel.
Godel’s focus had long been to identify and define a mathematical structure for infinity. If humanity had the means to encompass the infinity concept in a mathematical equation, then clearly, all probabilities could eventually be made available by a simple matter of plugging numbers into a computer. Godel never found this equation. Instead, what he found rocked the core of the scientific community and flustered prominent global elitists like Bertrand Russell.
The Incompleteness Proof became Godel’s crowning achievement, though it proved the exact opposite of what he had originally planned to find. Ironically, Godel’s mathematical model established, without question, that infinity cannot be quantified by mathematics, and that there is no scientific formula that encompasses all things. The proof does this using what we now call a “self inclusive paradox”. A simplified example of this idea is represented in this word puzzle:
“Everything I say is a lie”
If I lied, then is everything I say actually a lie? The circle goes on forever and defies logical explanation. Godel placed this puzzle in the form of an equation, and ended the elitist delusion that all things could one day be dissected by math. Now, there are those who respond to this fact by quipping that “some things are unknowable, until we know them…” These folks do not understand what a mathematical proof is.
A “proof” is an undeniable mathematical reality that will never change, and will never be undone. For instance, one plus one will ALWAYS equal two. Always. There is no future date in which this equation will not represent concrete fact. The same goes for the Incompleteness Proof. Bertrand Russell, a prominent supporter of the New World Order with visions of scientific dictatorship sought desperately to dismantle Godel’s Incompleteness Proof, even to the point of writing a massive three volume mathematical theorem, the Principia Mathematica, that fell utterly flat. Just in case you are not aware of what kind of man Russell was, here’s a quote to educate you:
“After all, most civilized and semi-civilized countries known to history and had a large class of slaves or serfs completely subordinate to their owners. There is nothing in human nature that makes the persistence of such a system impossible. And the whole development of scientific technique has made it easier than it used to be to maintain a despotic rule of a minority. When the government controls the distribution of food, its power is absolute so long as they can count on the police and the armed forces. And their loyalty can be secured by giving them some of the privileges of the governing class. I do not see how any internal movement of revolt can ever bring freedom to the oppressed in a modern scientific dictatorship…” – Bertrand Russell, The Impact Of Science On Society
Russell expended so much effort in vain against Godel’s proof because it threatened his globalist theology of human godhood. If the universe could not be fully defined through numbers, then the elites would never be all knowing deities. They are already aware that their goal is unattainable, and yet, they continue in their insanity to press forward…
Inherent Psychological Knowledge
If the elites cannot control the very fabric of the universe, then they have revealed through their methodologies that they would at least be satisfied with controlling the human mind. If they can control perception, then they can manipulate the masses into believing that they are gods, even if they never will be.
The key to perception control, at least in theory, is to gain dominance of environmental conditions within society. In other words, use people as blank canvases and paint them as you please. This strategy assumes, however, that people are “blank canvases”, and that human character and ideology is determined solely by environment. This philosophy of mass mental molding was undone by the studies of Carl Gustav Jung, a psychologist who was booted out of the mainstream psychiatric community because his findings destroyed the blank slate assertions of the Freudian model.
Jung discovered that the mind was, in fact, not “blank”. Rather, the building blocks of certain knowledge, personality, and even moral conscience were inherent at birth. This inborn knowledge gave humanity the virtue of choice; and if people are born with the ability to choose, then their environment is only as influential as they choose to let it be. This limits technocrats to medicinal suppression of preexisting personality traits, which is not “godlike” at all. The suppression of personality is a far cry from the creation of personality.
The question of where, exactly, inherent knowledge comes from, must also be a frustrating conundrum for the elites. One might discard religion, but it would appear that even the sciences suggest that there is another force or intelligence out there, far beyond the capabilities of man’s observation, or ability.
Children In A Sandbox
When I look at the entire summation of elitist efforts to remake the world, all I see is a naïve reorganizing of a much greater work of art. Life is not perfect, at least, not by our definition, but life is also not a science; it is an emotional creation, with an emotional and spiritual brand of “logic”. The rational Puritanism and technocultism of the globalists could never hope to unravel the mysteries of our universe, or our existence. You can never truly know what you do not truly love.
Invasive technologies, psychiatric manipulation, and genetic tinkering are, at bottom, nothing but mud-play in an imaginary sandbox. The elites want godlike power, but the greatest power of god is to create from nothingness. Technocrats do not create. Instead, they violently scoop up what already exists and fumble with it wildly, stupidly, fancying themselves omnipotent, like children lording over the ocean while pretending it’s a fish tank.
They do not comprehend the substance of what they meddle in, and this is their greatest downfall. You cannot improve on something you do not understand.
I do not subscribe to the notion that humanity exists only to subsist and to procreate. I do not believe we are meant to remain in the dark as to the nature of life. If that were the case then we would not have been endowed with such insatiable curiosity, or the free will to follow it. I do believe that we are here to learn, and to grow, and to find solace in a greater recognition of our existence. That said, there is a vast difference between knowing a thing, and trying to control a thing. For the elites, understanding is not enough. For the elites, understanding is only a door to dominance.
Luckily, fundamental unknowns derail the pursuit of full knowledge, and thus, full control. The universe has its own checks and balances in place to counter the ambitious, striking down thirsty faux gods who reach too high for what they do not respect, and will never deserve.
Brandon Smith is the founder of the Alternative Market Project, an organization designed to help you find like-minded activists and preppers in your local area so that you can network and construct communities for barter and mutual aid. Join www.Alt-Market.com today and learn what it means to step away from the unstable mainstream system and build something better. You can contact Brandon Smith at: [email protected].
New generation of elites taking the transnational reins?
As today’s groundbreaking revelations by Infowars will possibly reveal, Bilderberg is moving itself into a new hybrid leviathan, with Google as the new vehicle for policy implementation. A new generation has emerged, alligning itself with the good old boys at Bilderberg. Not that this newer generation has appeared out of thin air to rock the world of the old-timers. Far from it. The key players now taking the digital helm in this probable “Googleberg” construct are literally the offspring of the older players who are keenly aware that if the ancient agenda is to endure, a merger with the new guard needs to be established.
One such key player who has presumably been offered the steering wheel in both policy setting- and operational activities, is the son of the former queen Beatrix of the Netherlands, Constantijn van Oranje-Nassau. As EU commissioner Neelie Kroes’ first man in her “digital agenda” cabinet, Constantijn is well placed to play a key role in securing the reigns in the hands of international bankers who make the final decisions. Constantijn was described as “programme associate” of the Bilderberg group on the official royal website back in 2009. Although the website scrubbed the mention shortly after I published this information on Infowars.com, the original cached page was salvaged thanks to vigilant observers in the alternative media.
Constantijn’s benefactor in the world of global governance, Neelie Kroes, attended all Bilderberg meetings from 2006 onward- and since 2011 is the European commissioner for the digital agenda. Kroes, who is right up there with Henry Kissinger and David Rockefeller, is now handing over some of the responsibilities to a new generation of technocrats. Not very surprising then that Van Orange- the grandson of Bilderberg founder Bernhard- has recently been appointed by Kroes to head up her commission cabinet.
Kroes’ agenda as commissioner and dedicated Bilderberg member has been from the very onset to create and expand a mandatory electronic ID system for all citizens within the EU. In 2012 Kroes announced that a common “electronic signature”- a single authenticating ID- should safeguard access to the Internet, online data and commerce- described by Aaron Dykes on May 23 2012 as “nothing short of an attempt to phase in a Mark of the Beast system, and a prominent Bilderberg attendee is behind the scheme.”
Dykes also pointed out that such a common digital signature, used by all people within the EU, is destined for worldwide expansion:
“According to EurActiv.com, Neelie Kroes would later “widen the scope of the current Directive by including also ancillary authentication services that complement e-signatures, like electronic seals, time/date stamps, etc,” as the supra-national body attempts to corral more nations into participation.”
In 2009 Constantijn wrote a RAND technical paper, stating that the EU and a few elite nations should take the lead role in deciding a global governance structure for internet regulation and developing technologies. In the paper titled Trends in connectivity technologies and their socioeconomic impacts, the prince envisions a global coordination role for the EU:
“ (…) both policy issues and effective responses must be defined at a global level; to influence the solution a global coordination and ‘enlightened leadership’ is required.” and “policy issues, not always solutions, will be defined at a global level. Those few countries or regional blocks like the EU where these technologies are already at an advanced stage may take a more or less enlightened lead role.”
Constantijn’s speciality in his days with the RAND Corporation ranged from several technical reports on web 2.0 to RFID technology and other matters concerning “global governance” and electronics. In 2008 Constantijn was promoted to head the Brussels RAND office, expanding his influence even more. In 2009 Constantijn published his “discussion paper on critical issues” under the RAND-umbrella titled The Future of the Internet Economy. In it, he is quite uninhibited in his call for the emergence of an overall system of control to steer the course of events globally.
“(…) the Internet as a global infrastructure needs a global governance structure”, Van Oranje writes. “International governance is necessary to deal with global issues and ensuring effective functioning of the Internet, following principles of good governance.”
The intentionally vague addition of “good governance” is a smart way to circumvent explaining that only a tyrannical transnational system can guarantee “effective functioning of the Internet.” Furthermore, the prince advocated the ideal tool for future slavery: one common, global electronic denominator hooked into a hive-like supercomputer:
“Though a sectoral, geographic and multi-layered patchwork is likely, a scenario with a more unified system is not impossible either. There are significant benefits for citizens, governments and commercial operators to have a more standardised system that would support a large range of eGovernment services and functions. One system would eliminate the need for multiple cards, would increase the possibility for interconnecting systems”, and the list goes on.
The warnings of Aaron Russo immediately spring to mind, don’t they? As one of the determinants of such a common system through which all of human traffic should be channelled, the report mentions:
“The level of Pan-European ambition towards the use of a single eIdentity throughout Europe by 2015: Will policy makers of Commission (European Commission) and Member States agree on a system that is to support only simple identity; will Pan-European services be build/transformed in a way that they benefit directly from eID; or will there be a natural evolution towards one single European IDM, adequate for most national and Pan-European Government Services?”
As the royal family’s own website reports, from 2001 to 2003 prince Constantijn worked as a strategic policy consultant with Booz, Allen & Hamilton operating out of London, England. Booz Allen is a globally operating, self-proclaimed “private consulting firm” right out of a John Grisham novel with all the dark intrigue that goes along with it. Since its creation in the early 1900s, Booz, Allen & Hamilton has been intimately tied to the military-industrial complex including “long-standing relationships with federal intelligence agencies”- as a superficial glance on Wikipedia reveals. A March 8 2008 article in CorpWatch reported that the firm “is a key advisor and prime contractor to all of the major U.S. intelligence agencies (…). Among the many services Booz Allen provides to intelligence agencies, according to its website, are war-gaming- simulated drills in which military and intelligence officials test their response to potential threats like terrorist attacks.”
A most interesting speciality of the firm is the development of electronic surveillance equipment and other spy-tools. After Van Oranje’s promising career at this key corporation within the intelligence community, his obvious next step was the RAND Corporation where the young prince could work on his policy-making skills while at the same time maintaining his close relationship with the big foundations. In Daniel Estulin’s 2005 bestseller “The Bilderberg Group” the author clarifies the ties between the RAND Corporation and these global entities:
“The interlocking leadership between the trustees at RAND, and the Ford, Rockefeller, and Carnegie foundations is a classic case of Bilderberg modus operandi. The Ford foundation gave one million dollars to RAND in 1952, at a time when the president of the Ford Foundation was simultaneously the chairman of RAND.”
RAND plays a key role in developing technologies that may be used by intelligence agencies who in turn want to get rid of certain non-compliant regimes. In a RAND document from 2012 titled Using Social Media to Gauge Iranian Public Opinion and Mood After the 2009 Election the authors describe collecting thousands of tweets from the Iranian people in the months following the Iranian elections of 2009. The think tank complained about the shortcomings of just scanning through Iranian blogs and such. In order to assess the Iranian zeitgeist, RAND turned to an extraordinary computer-program called LIWC:
“Given the shortcomings of the manual approach, using a computerized method to study the content of social media can serve as a useful complement, compensating for some of these limitations. Such a tool exists: an automated content analysis program called “Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count 2007” (LIWC, pronounced “Luke”).”
“Focusing on Twitter, we used LIWC as a means of tapping into Iranian public opinion and mood during the tumultuous months following the highly controversial 2009 presidential election”, the report states.
Admitting that the probing and analyzing of Iranian tweets serves the national security interests of the United States, the RAND researchers in the same breath admit:
“Given that LIWC is largely untried in non-Western political contexts, we used Iran during this period as a test case. On the one hand, we sought to shed light on how public opinion and mood evolved after the 2009 election. But at the same time, we intended to examine the validity of a new methodology—one incorporating the LIWC tool—for analyzing foreign public sentiment on political topics, as expressed through the social media platform, Twitter.”
The results, according to the authors, are so full of promise that they seek to expand the program even further. Under the header “Expanding the Scope of the Current Work” they state:
“To extend this current work, applying the methodology to other forms of social media is an obvious next step. For instance, we have conducted initial analyses of Iranian, Persian-language blogs, and of political leaders’ Facebook postings, which are not reported here.”
The authors are aware of the implications of their research when it comes to national security “interests”:
“We could also extend the current research by looking across more than one country at a time to gauge the sentiments that social media users in each country express on topics of interest to them all”, the report continues.
“For example, using the current methodology, it is possible to compare sentiments expressed across Iran, Pakistan, and other countries on topics including the United States, nuclear weapons, and domestic political issues. Other extensions of the current research could focus on Asian countries that are high on the national security agenda, such as China and Taiwan, or on Middle Eastern countries where political protests in early 2011 were reportedly influenced by social media use, such as Egypt and Tunisia.”
Because the methods used by RAND were retrospective in nature, the authors envision using this and other software for monitoring of international conflicts “as they unfold”:
“A final way to extend the current methodology is to build a real-time tracking tool for social media texts. Such a tool could automatically download texts as they are posted, run them through a parsing algorithm, and place them into a database for processing through LIWC (or other software). Using such a tool, it would be possible to view and analyse patterns in written texts almost as quickly as they unfold. Given the policy relevance of our findings, these recommendations for validation and extensions of the methodology illustrate the potential of analysing social media to understand public mood and opinion in various populations of interest.”
Studies such as these should not give on the impression that these monitoring and surveillance technologies are being used without the consent of corporations like Twitter, Google and Facebook- nor have they been hijacked at some point. On the contrary, as has become clear from countless “incidents” where these corporations have been caught censoring information, they are an active player within the technocratic architecture, set up from their very beginnings by globalist money. As Google Ideas illustrates, already hybrid connections between Google and the US government are being strengthened. According to several Stratford e-mails released by Wikileaks in March of 2012, Google Ideas’ current director Jared Cohen was presumably working for the White House as he attempted to fire up the spark of regime change. As Alahkbar reported, the Brookings Insititute valued Google Ideas as “the best new think tank established in the last 18 months.” Such accolade arguably suggests that Google Ideas is expected to be a major player in the near future.”
Brookings, an extremely influential think tank advising policymakers within the US government, also use their academically preconditioned brains to think about using Google, Twitter and Facebook as tools to achieve regime change in dissenting nations. As their document Which Path To Persia demonstrates, the plans for such operations are already being contemplated. In chapter 7 of the manuscript titled “Inspiring an Insurgency”, it examines the possibility of propagandizing the Iranian people into helping out the globalists loot their nation, stating “U.S. media and propaganda outlets could highlight group grievances and showcase rival leaders.”
The merging of Bilderberg’s post WW2-style corporate complex with technocratic giants will now accelerate an agenda that has been long in the making. By Benito Mussolini’s definition of fascism, that’s what it is. “Fascism”, Mussolini wrote, “should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power.” Already in the works for decades this construct, or governance structure- merging big government with big corporations- is now taking a decisive digital leap with Bilderberg 2.0 which, by Mussolini’s definition, equals a new and enhanced version of the same old fascism.
Jurriaan Maessen’s website is Explosivereports.com.
U.S. Vice-president Joe Biden did not hesitate to call for a New World Order while participating in the Export Import Bank conference in Washington. There, Biden simply let it out: “The affirmative task we have now is to actually create a new world order.” The American politician refers to the establishment of a centralized one-world global government that directs the road that humanity will follow for the rest of its existence.
But don’t let Biden fool you. There is no need to create or establish a New World Order, because that entity has already been established and it has been working for a long time. As it happens often, the people behind the New World Order let us know about their plans once they have fully implemented them.
Biden justified the creation of a New World Order based on his assessment that “the global order is changing again, and the institutions of the world that worked so well in the post-World War II era for decades, they need to be strengthened, and some need to be changed.” These institutions that Biden mentions are the same ones established by the New World Order which are no longer able to hold the globalists fraudulent scheme afloat, and therefore, they need to be changed for something even more tyrannical.
Of course we did not need Joe Biden to tell us about the New World Order, as it has been announced for decades, even on main stream media. That’s right, the same media that worked as accomplices of the New World Order, was finally allowed to tell us that we are all controlled by a supranational entity that has been modeling the world at large for centuries.
If you are familiar with how the world really works, this all makes sense to you, but if you are new to the New World Order system, I recommend you watch the documentary film by Paul Flynn film that covers the political & spiritual parts of the New World Order, the grand conspiracy so many claim to understand. Flynn traces the ideology back to its roots in Alice Bailey’s writings, lays out the future, and even outlines a way out.
As all this information makes it patently clear, Mr. Biden, the U.S. Government and almost all other governments work not for their people, but for their real masters: The members of the already established New World Order.
Luis R. Miranda is the Founder and Editor of The Real Agenda. His 16 years of experience in Journalism include television, radio, print and Internet news. Luis obtained his Journalism degree from Universidad Latina de Costa Rica, where he graduated in Mass Media Communication in 1998. He also holds a Bachelor’s Degree in Broadcasting from Montclair State University in New Jersey. Among his most distinguished interviews are: Costa Rican President Jose Maria Figueres and James Hansen from NASA Space Goddard Institute. Read more about Luis.
Pretty dang bold and blatant, wouldn’t you say? He ain’t my Pope. And what “new world” are they talking about?
Man they’re pushing hard and fast. This Jesuit Pope was popped into place before the sulfuric stink of the last one could even clear the air. The hurry up no doubt was needed to take the spotlight off of that contrived removal and the ensuing inconvenient ongoing exposure of Ratzinger’s child abuse, financial enabling and cover ups.
And then he goes into hiding. Hard to fathom a world that tolerates this, but we’re living in one.
What’s encouraging is the amount of exposes appearing all over on the sordid background of this nasty new Italian “Argentinian” minion and the truth about the perfidy of the Jesuit so called “society of Jesus”. Boy, if that doesn’t sum up the hypocrisy of organized religion I don’t know what does.
But to the entranced this is still going right over their hived little minds.
Why The Hurry Up
This fast Vatican bamboozle is just one symptom of something we’re seeing in several segments of society. I think they’re nervous about completing their timeline and whatever other stupid goals they’ve set they think they need to fulfill according to their ignorant thinktanks, occult jerkwads or whatever.
It’s pitiful what they’re doing. Such desperation. Why? They’re scared.
Just look at the speed and profundity of other significant events now being orchestrated in our faces.
Here’s a quick six of biggies in our faces right now:
–The EU just moved to confiscate a percentage of savings in private accounts in Cyprus to bail out more corrupt banks. That is well beyond all previous levels of financial intrusion. And now they’re threatening to do it in Italy as well.
–The Royal Society announces their eugenics intentions in plain sight. Number reductions, and potential methods of doing so.
–Obama and company’s extremely rapid erosion of American civil and otherwise liberties via fascistic executive orders, including a subject never before confronted in such a crass, frontal manner – disarming the American public.
–Geoengineering models are being injected into mainstream media for acceptance of a model and potential need for “modification” by our illustrious bought off scientists.
– Emerging serious questions about the massively increased drone warfare and surveillance, both international and now clearly domestically aimed, becomes more accepted by default.
–”Reassigning” great water areas to algae growing fields at the expense of natural processes and serious pollution. Serious stuff here.
(Lots more, make your own list…it’s a daily task now.)
The Beat of the Drums
In battle the last ditch effort of a warring ship is shifting into ramming speed, to literally puncture and sink the other boat with its hull no matter the cost to the attacking ship. If you remember, in the old movies the drummers coordinating the below deck chained oarsmen would step up the meter of the pounding drums faster and faster until finally reaching ramming speed.
The horror of the scene was knowing those same chained-together oarsmen would be drowned due to their own efforts, very much the MO of this dark cabal running the systems of our planetary society. The only difference is the hoodwinked minions establishing this so-called New World Order today don’t realize their own expendibility as the oarsmen did……yet.
Drums arouse passion. It can be a good signal, or a wicked one. It’s not so much the beat, but the surrounding intention, environment and propaganda.
Behold today’s media.
The Good News – Desperation Ain’t Confident, We Are…for Good Reason
Their floundering efforts are ultimately ludicrous in the grand scheme of things. These power mad freaks are attempting to implement a summation of all of their age old ploys at fear mongering, intimidation and ultimate control attempts to subjugate a cowed mass.
Same old, same old. Bastards need to realize they’ve been outmoded, outsmarted and out-housed a long time ago.
They’re acting out their rage against light. They’re freaking for the fantasmagoric finish line they envision, a phony baloney world they dream of controlling. Ain’t gonna happen. They might see something for a moment, but it’ll vanish as fast as their sick imaginations conjured it.
The beauty of the era we’re living in is seeing the fulfillment of the power of Love and Truth. And our conscious participation in it. It’s a privilege to be here at this time. Overcoming this false projection in its last throes is a dream come true for any Truth warrior. Our time to manifest is now. Our ultimate fulfillment of everything wonderful about our superior, loving humane race is the grand consummation of our era.
Let’s do it boldly, bravely and with triumphant true knowledge of loving, glorious Truth!
Love always and all ways,
As jazz guitar player ‘George Benson’ once said in a popular tune “Everything must change”. I’m inspired to reiterate in this article that everything is constantly changing. Change is part of nature and it is always happening. We however, that is, each and every one of us on earth, have the power to change things for the better or for the worse. Herein is the core of my hope, energy and alacrity with respect to where we are now and where we are heading as a species.
Acknowledging that change is inevitable is a great starting point for facing a paradigm shift as immense as the one we are facing right now. It’s the beginning of clearing the lies you’ve been conditioned to believe and to finding out your purpose in our battle for freedom, sanity, human compassion, ethics, and human dignity. The process goes something like this: First you acknowledge change, then you take a chance and do your own sincere research and question all the lies they tell you, then you see the truth, then you choose to defend all of the inalienable rights we were all born with that no one can ever take away. When the process is through you’ll understand exactly why the government, mainstream media and Hollywood all act as one for the same purpose and why and how we’ve arrived at a point where freedom is slavery and slavery is freedom.
For those who have yet to consider the broad issue of individual freedom versus the tyranny and fascism that comes with uncontrolled big government, please consider where you are headed as the context of reality changes all around you, or as some call it the ‘paradigm shift’ moves forward. The current paradigm shift I warn you, is altering many perspectives leaving many mainstream media believers with hard decisions.
At this point in history mainstream media believers are arguably fundamentally insane. Too many missing logical, ethical and fundamental human links have now developed fully disconnecting your thought process from that expected of an intuitive, critical thinking and compassionate human being. This disconnect is expressed during your acceptance of mainstream media stories which regularly disregard:
a. The fundamental purpose for humans being on earth.
b. Core ethical human rights and the pursuit of freedom.
c. The natural inclination humans have for wanting to thrive while on earth.
Historically, philosophically, psychologically, and ethically speaking one can then confidently see where someone who is currently still believing mainstream media news and accepting the insanity that they sell to the dumbed-down masses every day, while considered ‘sane’ and ‘normal’ by many still, are sliding inevitably into a different category of sanity, ethics, morals and ‘cognitive criminality’ (as I call it). Yes we are all different and this concept is a general concept for humanity to consider. Seeing the bigger picture and the greater point being made here may save many from missing the forest for the trees.
A person can be lied to so often as to be made temporarily dysfunctional to his/her own species. This loss of functionality is already being manifested in many dumbed-down mainstream media and TV watching zombies. This loss of functionality is observable and provable in our current day and age. No one expects those suffering from this loss of cognitive, human and moral functionality to accept this verdict and observation without a protest. People don’t consider themselves mentally handicapped just for believing mainstream media news; that observation and acknowledgment comes with the awakening that many of us have already experienced.
Ultimately this issue of proving who is sane and who is insane falls into the hands of truth, God, nature and global consciousness. Thankfully truth, love, compassion, ethics, morals and respect for human dignity has never or ever will find itself ashamed in the face of governments, purveyors of propaganda and lies. Nature has already done the dirty work for us and humanity as a whole will never have to wonder if tyranny, fascism and disrespect for basic human rights is the right way of going about things; this question was answered for us for as long as humanity can remember and the answer is no.
The argument that somehow a small group of people positioning themselves in the context of a government can violate your human rights, incarcerate you and deprive you of your right to thrive as a human being is logically incorrect, devoid of ethics and morality and cognitively insane. There is no substitute for this logic and at the core of the current paradigm shift is this fundamental acknowledgment.
So as people wake up to the global government agenda the globalist monkeys are moving forward with, let us keep in mind the slippery slope mainstream media believers find themselves in. Realize that they are temporarily (mentally) protected by a wall of mass propaganda being constantly delivered to them via TV, cinema, billboards, magazines and other avenues. This railroad of entertainment, media and constant distraction is essentially protecting (or delaying) their insanity from being directly exposed. It is still easy for a mainstream media believer to look around and perceive that their perceptions are normal. Exposing this process of ‘perception of the perception’ is a sizable part of the current paradigm shift which incidentally Hollywood and the mainstream media work so hard at maintaining.
In the same manner that we can look back at historic events and cast judgment on entire societies, likewise mainstream media believers are carving out their place in the historic archives of public insanity to be seen by future generations as the lunatics who let it all happen. Normal today insane tomorrow is thus the inevitable road many are on notwithstanding the natural inclination we have for running from danger and thus changing our ways as a result. Many thankfully will awaken eventually when the right event happens that leaves them with no other option but to wake up to their lies and run the other way. Such is the pattern of life and the process of nature and human interactions. Everyone learns their lesson one way or the other but no one has to be convinced to get out of a burning building. Some just don’t see the building burning yet.
For the sake of completeness let’s keep in mind the definition of Insane:
This is the established meaning of the term we’ve used and we are well within the true intended meaning of the word as I pose this argument. Insanity follows a set of rules that the mainstream media, the globalist monkeys and its representative puppet politicians are following step by step. Let’s not let anyone temporarily or subjectively rearrange the established meanings of these simple terms.
This is a perfect example of truth setting you free. Truth, unlike those that love government propaganda, subjectivity and facilitating arguments, does have universal acknowledgment and doesn’t need to put up a fight or undergo expensive propaganda campaigns to make it truer. The truth is also easy to understand making it absorbable by all who choose to acknowledge it. We need only to turn off the insanity tube of lies that continues to deliver cognitive messages to your head that are not based on any of the truth principles mentioned earlier. This insanity for sale (by the mainstream media and Hollywood) is the new world order and the global government of slavery we are arriving at now.
They have sold their insanity to many but thankfully there is a way to undo the insanity as many have found out. We have the cognitive equipment to undo the insanity and restore our mental capacity to one that cares about humanity and life in general. Will you be someone who will be found some time in the near future to have been dabbling in insanity? Are mainstream media believers the greatest example of mass insanity history has ever seen? Let us recognize this problem now and help those sliding into insanity to be free.
In closing I want to express compassion for all mainstream media believers. Those of you out still believing mass media news don’t realize how deep in lies you are in. You are not an enemy but a victim of their mass mind control tactics. The mainstream media and Hollywood are the two primary mouthpieces of the global government and the sooner you realize this the sooner your mind will be free. Since we started this article with a song we’ll end with one. Here’s to entertaining things that are not real and fantasizing in the perceived beauty of what they represent. Try to see the message in this tune dedicate to you. Owl City- by Fireflies
Bernie Suarez is an activist, critical thinker, radio host, musician, M.D, Veteran, lover of freedom and the Constitution, and creator of the Truth and Art TV project. He also has a background in psychology and highly recommends that everyone watch a documentary titled The Century of the Self. Bernie has concluded that the way to defeat the New World Order is to truly be the change that you want to see. Manifesting the solution and putting truth into action is the very thing that will defeat the globalists.
Perhaps you remember the ill-fated Just-Label-It campaign. A number of activist groups petitioned the FDA for a federal regulation that would make labeling GMO food mandatory.
The petition amassed over a million signatures. But the FDA decided only 394 of these were legitimate, because all the others were electronically submitted in one document.
Infuriating? Of course. But that was nothing. Let’s get down to the core of the crime.
Imagine this. A killer is put on trial, and the jury, in a surprise verdict, finds him not guilty. Afterwards, reporters interview this killer. He says, “The jury freed me. It’s up to them. They decide. That’s what justice is all about.”
Then the press moves along to members of the jury, who say: Well, we had to take the defendant’s word. He said he was innocent, so that’s what we ruled.
That’s an exact description of the FDA and Monsanto partnership.
When you cut through the verbiage that surrounded the introduction of GMO food into America, you arrive at two key statements. One from Monsanto and one from the FDA, the agency responsible for overseeing, licensing, and certifying new food varieties as safe.
Quoted in the New York Times Magazine (October 25, 1998, “Playing God in the Garden”), Philip Angell, Monsanto’s director of corporate communications, famously stated: “Monsanto shouldn’t have to vouchsafe the safety of biotech food. Our interest is in selling as much of it as possible. Assuring its safety is the FDA’s job.”
From the Federal Register, Volume 57, No.104, “Statement of [FDA] Policy: Foods Derived from New Plant Varieties,” here is what the FDA had to say on this matter: “Ultimately, it is the food producer who is responsible for assuring safety.”
The direct and irreconcilable clash of these two statements is no accident. It’s not a sign of incompetence or sloppy work or a mistake or a miscommunication. It’s a clear signal that the fix was in.
Passing the buck back and forth was the chilling and arrogant strategy through which Pandora’s box was pried opened and GMO food was let into the US food supply.
In order for this titanic scam to work, the media had to cooperate. Reporters had to be a) idiots and b) sell-outs.
With few exceptions, reporters and their editors let the story rest there, as a “he said-he said” issue. No sane principled journalist would have cut bait at that point, but who said mainstream reporters are sane or principled?
Underneath the Monsanto-FDA buck-passing act, there was a conscious deal to give a free pass to GMO crops. This had nothing to do with science or health or “feeding the world.” It was about profits. It was also about establishing a new monopoly on food.
Not only would big agribusiness dominate the planet’s food supply, it would strengthen its stranglehold through patents on novel types of seeds which were technologically engineered.
It’s very much like saying, “A cob of corn is not a plant, it’s a machine, and we own the rights to every one of those yellow machines.”
How was Monsanto able to gather so much clout?
There was one reason and one reason only. Putting the world’s food supply into fewer hands was, and is, a major item on the Globalist agenda. If it weren’t, the FDA-Monsanto scam would have been exposed in a matter of weeks or months.
Major newspapers and television networks would have attacked the obvious con job like packs of wild dogs and torn it to pieces.
But once the scam had been given a free pass, the primary corporate-government tactic was to accomplish a fait accompli, a series of events that was irreversible.
In this case, it was about gene drift. From the beginning, it was well known that GMO plants release genes that blow in the wind and spread from plant to plant, crop to crop, and field to field. There is no stopping it.
Along with convincing enough farmers to lock themselves into GMO-seed contracts, Monsanto bought up food-seed companies in order to engineer the seeds…and the gene-drift factor was the ace in the hole.
Sell enough GMO seeds, plant enough GMO crops, and you flood the world’s food crops with Monsanto genes.
Back in the 1990s, the prince of darkness, Michael Taylor, who has moved through the revolving door between the FDA and Monsanto several times, and is now the czar of food safety at the FDA—Taylor said, with great conviction, that the GMO revolution was unstoppable; within a decade or two, an overwhelming percentage of food grown on planet Earth would be GMO.
Taylor and others knew. They knew about gene drift, and they also knew that ownership of the world’s food, by a few companies, was a prime focus for Globalist kings who intended to feed the population through Central Planning and Distribution.
“We feed these people; we hold back food from those people; we send food there; we don’t send food here.”
Control food and water, and you hold the world in your hand.
Here is evidence that, even in earlier days, Monsanto knew about and pushed for the Globalist agenda. Quoted by J. Flint, in his 1998 “Agricultural Giants Moving Towards Genetic Monopolism,” Robert Fraley, head of Monsanto’s agri-division, stated: “What you are seeing is not just a consolidation of [Monsanto-purchased] seed companies. It’s really a consolidation of the entire food chain.”
And as for the power of the propaganda in that time period, I can think of no better statement than the one made on January 25th, 2001, by the outgoing US Secretary of Agriculture, Dan Glickman. As reported by the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Glickman said:
“What I saw generically on the pro-biotech side was the attitude that the technology was good and that it was almost immoral to say that it wasn’t good, because it was going to solve the problems of the human race and feed the hungry and clothe the naked. And there was a lot of money that had been invested in this, and if you’re against it, you’re Luddites, you’re stupid. There was rhetoric like that even here in this department. You felt like you were almost an alien, disloyal, by trying to present an open-minded view on some of these issues being raised. So I pretty much spouted the rhetoric that everybody else around here spouted; it was written into my speeches.”
Glickman reveals several things in these remarks: he was spineless; people at the Dept. of Agriculture were madly buying into the Monsanto cover story about feeding the world; and there had to be a significant degree of infiltration at his Agency.
The last point is key. This wasn’t left to chance. You don’t get a vocal majority of Dept. of Agriculture personnel spouting the Monsanto propaganda merely because the fairy tale about feeding the world sounds so good. No, there are people working on the inside to promote the “social cause” and make pariahs out of dissenters.
You need special background and training to pull that off. It isn’t an automatic walk in the park. This is professional psyop and intelligence work.
I’ve done some investigation of various groups on both the left and the right, and I’ve seen some pros in action. They’re good. They know how to leverage ideas and slogans and ideals. They know how to defame opponents and find just the right words to sink them. They know how to turn high-flying but vague words about “humanity” into moral imperatives.
This isn’t rinky-dink stuff. To tune up bureaucrats and scientists, you have to have a background in manipulation. You have to know what you’re doing. You have to be able to build and sustain support, without giving your game away.
Truth be told, governments are full of these pros, who will take any number of causes and turn them into what falsely sounds like good science, good government, good morality, all the while knowing that, on the far shore, sits the real prize: control.
These psyop specialists are hired to help make overarching and planet-wide agendas come true, as populations are brought under sophisticated and pathological elites who care, for example, about feeding the world as much as a collector cares about paralyzing and pinning butterflies on a panel in a glass case.
Here is David Rockefeller, writing in his 2003 Memoirs:
Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure—one world, if you will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”
The Globalists play for keeps.
Owning the food of the world is part of their strike-force action plan, and Monsanto is the technocratic arm of that plan.
Meanwhile, the controlled press treats the whole sordid Monsanto story with its time-honored policy of “he said-he said.” This policy dictates that stories merely present both sides of a conflict without drawing conclusions.
It applies across the board—except when it doesn’t. For example, for reasons too complex to go into here, the Washington Post decided to suspend its policy in the Watergate case. Woodward and Bernstein were assigned to investigate what was going on behind White House denials and obfuscations.
The same thing could be done with Monsanto, and it would be far easier. The lies and crimes and cover-ups are everywhere. You could wear sunglasses and find them in the dark.
The NY Times and the Washington Post could sell millions more papers on the back of the Monsanto story alone. It would be a bonanza for them. But no. They don’t care. They’d rather keep declining and losing readers. They’d rather die.
Normally, a business doesn’t commit suicide, especially when it sees exactly how to resuscitate itself. But here we are dealing with an agenda which can’t be disturbed. Globalism, and its agri-techno partner, Monsanto, are creating a planetary future. Major media are part and parcel of that op. They are selling it.
Even as their bottom lines erode, these newspapers and television networks have to stay on their present course. By pretending they’re reporting the real news, they’re giving the impression that Monsanto and the FDA are home free.
Again, we aren’t talking about sloppy reporting or accidental omissions of fact or boggling incompetence or ignorance about science. We are talking about conscious intent to deceive.
Yes, now and then the controlled media will release a troubling piece about Monsanto. But placement and frequency are everything. How often do these stories run? Do they run as the lead or do we find them on page 7? Are reporters assigned to keep pounding on a basic story and reveal more and more crimes? Does the basic story gather steam over the course of weeks and months?
These are the decisions that make or break a story. In the case of Monsanto and the FDA, the decisions were made a long time ago.
Part of every new reporter’s training, if he has any ideals at all, is marching into his editor’s office with his hair on fire demanding to be given an assignment to expose a crime. The editor, knowing the true agenda of his newspaper or television network, tells the reporter:
“We’ve already covered that.”
“It’s old news.”
“People aren’t interested in it.”
“It’s too complicated.”
“The evidence you’re showing me is thin.”
“You’ll never get to the bottom of it.”
“The people involved won’t talk to you.”
And if none of those lies work, the editor might say, “If you keep pushing this, it would be bad for your career. You’ll lose access for other stories. You’ll be thought of as weird…”
This is how the game works at ground level. But make no mistake about it, the hidden agenda is about protecting an elite’s op from exposure.
If NBC, for example, gave its golden boy, Brian Williams, the green light, he would become an expert on Monsanto in three days. He’d become a tiger. He’d affect a whole set of morally outraged poses and send Monsanto down into Hell.
Don’t misunderstand. Brian hasn’t been waiting to move in for the kill. He’s a neutral entity. Wind him up and point to a target and he’ll go there.
But no one will point him at Monsanto or the FDA.
All the major reporters at news outlets and all the elite television anchors are really psyop specialists. It’s just that most of them don’t know it.
One outraged major reporter who woke up and got out of the business put it to me this way: When he was in the game, he looked at the news as a big public restroom. His one guiding principle was: Don’t piss on your shoes. Stand closer to the urinal. Pissing on your shoes was covering a story that was considered out of bounds. If you pissed on your shoes and walked into the boss’s office, he’d look at you and see the telltale sign. He’d say, “Hey, you pissed on your shoes. That’s disgusting. Get out of here. You’re fired.”
The author of an explosive collection, THE MATRIX REVEALED, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at www.nomorefakenews.com